Hey Ryan really nice video. Like the vibe. Can't wait for part 2 :). Just a heads up, at 7:34 if your targets to temporarily banish included little knight, since the opponent popped the little knight there in the same chain, its effect to banish both monsters wouldn't resolve.
Actually no they resolved it properly. Doodle had a LONG talk with multiple judges when editing this footage. and it's because the target gained immunity during chain the merli would get banished as since neither target left the field, it's simular to the ruling for S:P and escape of the unchained situation.
@@WithDoodle gotcha, my bad, that wasn't too clear from the specific section for me since I don't really know what the rescue ace cards do. It looked like preventor was still on the field so I figured the targets for little knight was something else
Gonna need the deck list thatcontains Superpoly, Shadoll Fusion, King Sac, Danger, Malicious and even fucking Rainbow Bridge. Omg how can you find space for so many engines😂
Hey dont hate me but you made many illegal plays. 1 princess destroys Monsters even when she is shuffle away on activation in grave 2 sp little knight needs to banish the two monster target by her effect when one monster leaves the field before she resolves her effect will not happen. So merli would still be on field. 3. Typhon need to be summon over the monster with the most atk on your side of the field. That would be imsety and not rheino. But like to see someone enjoying my favourite deck ^^
Doodle talked to multiple judges on that interaction while editing the video s:p only fizzles if targets get moved. But both targets were still on the field so S:p would of resolved as much as possible
No thats not right he targeted sp little night and merli for the effect if littlle knight but the opponent destroy sp little knight before little knight resolves so merli does not get banished until the end phase
@@WithDoodle i missunderstood it i thought he target merli and sp and not preventer. Okay yeah than it was legal but still the 2 other points were not legal
Kit to 1
Hey Ryan really nice video. Like the vibe. Can't wait for part 2 :). Just a heads up, at 7:34 if your targets to temporarily banish included little knight, since the opponent popped the little knight there in the same chain, its effect to banish both monsters wouldn't resolve.
Actually no they resolved it properly. Doodle had a LONG talk with multiple judges when editing this footage. and it's because the target gained immunity during chain the merli would get banished as since neither target left the field, it's simular to the ruling for S:P and escape of the unchained situation.
the targets were preventor and merli
@@WithDoodle gotcha, my bad, that wasn't too clear from the specific section for me since I don't really know what the rescue ace cards do. It looked like preventor was still on the field so I figured the targets for little knight was something else
@@abysmalYGO proventer got protection as chain link 5 but target wasn't moved so s:p tried to resolve as much as possible.
I would like the deck profile
Gonna need the deck list thatcontains Superpoly, Shadoll Fusion, King Sac, Danger, Malicious and even fucking Rainbow Bridge. Omg how can you find space for so many engines😂
Can you please train me in playing Tearlaments?
Tearlaments still strong but voiceless is stronger 👀
Hey dont hate me but you made many illegal plays.
1 princess destroys Monsters even when she is shuffle away on activation in grave
2 sp little knight needs to banish the two monster target by her effect when one monster leaves the field before she resolves her effect will not happen. So merli would still be on field. 3. Typhon need to be summon over the monster with the most atk on your side of the field. That would be imsety and not rheino. But like to see someone enjoying my favourite deck ^^
No the s:p resolved legally for that chain interaction the targets were merli a precentor not s:p and merli
Doodle talked to multiple judges on that interaction while editing the video s:p only fizzles if targets get moved. But both targets were still on the field so S:p would of resolved as much as possible
No thats not right he targeted sp little night and merli for the effect if littlle knight but the opponent destroy sp little knight before little knight resolves so merli does not get banished until the end phase
@@VeskaKF1997 your telling the Editor who has the actual audio from the duel itself they are wrong what monsters were targeted verbally. Good try Bud
@@WithDoodle i missunderstood it i thought he target merli and sp and not preventer. Okay yeah than it was legal but still the 2 other points were not legal
Heavy cope