Wingspan Review - Flock and Roll

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2020
  • Support the Show: bit.ly/SupportSUSD / / shutupandsitdown
    Buy This Game: bit.ly/SUSD-WS In US: bit.ly/Wing-US In UK: bit.ly/4azASbr In CA: bit.ly/3Pdd427
    Visit SU&SD for more cardboard antics: tinyurl.com/v8smxj6d
    ~FOLLOW US AROUND, WHY DON'T YOU~
    Podcast: anchor.fm/susd
    Twitter: / shutupshow
    Instagram: / shut.up.and.sit.down
    Twitch: / shutupandsitdown
    TikTok: / shutupshow
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 1.1K

  • @isaacthimbleby8926
    @isaacthimbleby8926 4 ปีที่แล้ว +875

    Minor rules error at 7:08. You do not get a point for every bird on your board - you do however get the points written on each bird (which is mentioned separately slightly later).

    • @jasonr1993
      @jasonr1993 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Thanks, I thought we had been playing it wrong.

    • @marcinprzezdziek2524
      @marcinprzezdziek2524 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exactly !

    • @TheHexyBeast
      @TheHexyBeast 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      i was about to type this when i saw ur comment lol

    • @TheHexyBeast
      @TheHexyBeast 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      check out my solo review lol

    • @squish1504
      @squish1504 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Finn he needs to Ninja Edit :)

  • @Coswagrigus
    @Coswagrigus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +932

    This is the BEST negative review I’ve ever seen. While Quinns clearly doesn’t like the game, he’s still very kind and points to what makes the game lovely. Very open with his subjective feeling of the game, he never calls it objectively bad. Hats off boys, great review

    • @pikkdogs
      @pikkdogs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      If he said anything bad about the game, someone would come and burn his apar... flat down. Don’t believe me? Go to BGG and say anything remotely negative on the wingspan boards and you’ll be called an uncultured misogynist troll.

    • @stupidytacct
      @stupidytacct 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I love SUSD review of Scythe as well...

    • @sebastianbruzzone4731
      @sebastianbruzzone4731 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Jellybeantiger wtf

    • @WisdomProclaimer
      @WisdomProclaimer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Most comprehensive and eloquently spoken review ever! The game is expertly deconstructed to give real gamers the best honest review.

  • @Fudgeemonkee
    @Fudgeemonkee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +292

    "Your mother's a liar, your world is crumbling"
    - another classic SHUX quote that should go down in the annals of history!

  • @Cameronwatt
    @Cameronwatt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +511

    In my house we call it Terraforming marsh.

    • @EuropeanBeerisBad
      @EuropeanBeerisBad 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Oh that’s good

    • @ToddGretencord
      @ToddGretencord 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      100% accurate, both games that I want very much to like, but, just don't.

    • @TerraBooma
      @TerraBooma 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think you mean "Bioforming marsh" eyyy

    • @playstationyoutube4416
      @playstationyoutube4416 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It's funny you should say that, because I came here to say that almost all the criticisms apply to Terraforming Mars. I have had games of both that went well where I built a nice engine, and games that went badly. The difference is that Wingspan takes half the time. By the time I start to realize my game of Wingspan has gone badly, I only have to be polite for another half an hour. In Terraforming Mars, it could be an other 2 hours. I will never play Terraforming Mars Again.

    • @markanderson100
      @markanderson100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Except, one game has significantly more strategic than the other. :)

  • @richardmoore5347
    @richardmoore5347 4 ปีที่แล้ว +436

    Quinns: *Gives a well thought out review*
    My Brain for the entire review: "heh heh, Bird Girth"

    • @MrMichkov
      @MrMichkov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sigh, now we need to edit every every wikipedia plane entry. I'll take the Ds, dont forget to cite the video.

  • @poilboiler
    @poilboiler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +321

    You left out the best part of the Maribu Stork, how it protects its legs from sunburn by crapping on them. We can all learn from its majestic example.

    • @Manny-M
      @Manny-M 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Haha! Truly a horrid thing. And I thought the 'bin chickens' (read: Ibis) over here in Oz were bad. That thing takes the cake!

    • @Trezzpops
      @Trezzpops 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Noted

    • @MotiviqueStudio
      @MotiviqueStudio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For the Maribu Stork, SPF apparently means "Shitty Perch Fingers."

    • @marcgorter8651
      @marcgorter8651 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Flamingos too

  • @z-beeblebrox
    @z-beeblebrox 4 ปีที่แล้ว +210

    I love that one of Quinns's worst birds is an insect

    • @Nezbo
      @Nezbo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      To be fair, then it is a really bad bird 🤔

    • @AspelShuyin
      @AspelShuyin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@Nezbo Beautiful insect, though.

    • @CardboardBones
      @CardboardBones 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Nezbo Aren't we all just bad birds, then?

    • @ben-fe3zy
      @ben-fe3zy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bernie Clifton, Rod Hull, moths. The rest of us can only try

  • @Gnarrkhaz
    @Gnarrkhaz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +345

    I love how hype doesn't seem to affect SU&SD if the gameplay speaks another language, which is exactly what you want from a review show.

    • @Atlasfilms08
      @Atlasfilms08 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Really? I often feel like SUSD goes into hyped games with a more critical eye than normal to see if the game is really worth all the acclaim.

    • @28green
      @28green 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      When I saw they were reviewing Wingspan, I immediately before knew before watching they would pan it because they almost always pan hyped games.

    • @carlatate7678
      @carlatate7678 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@28green Yep.

    • @sopranoshelley
      @sopranoshelley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@28green Or maybe...Stonemaier games are just all overhyped

    • @markanderson100
      @markanderson100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@sopranoshelley Lol. So true. They're the opposite of Splotter games. It seems Stonemaier focuses on component quality to compensate for poor gameplay quality.

  • @sanfranfan72727
    @sanfranfan72727 4 ปีที่แล้ว +255

    After 2 minutes of front loaded praise: "You almost certainly think this is going to be a glowing review" LOL not likely.

    • @luiscarlosqg
      @luiscarlosqg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah! Completely true (the hype is well deserved, though)

    • @Healermain15
      @Healermain15 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      You know it's bad when the Classic Shux Mid-Review Turnaround (tm) is two minutes into the video.

    • @brotherhorus4316
      @brotherhorus4316 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No it's not...

    • @Cergorach
      @Cergorach 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      After about a minute, you get this omnious feeling "This ain't gonna be pretty!", if you've been watching SUSD for a long time...

    • @JaikuRirishii
      @JaikuRirishii 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's too... expected out of SU&SD? The opening was so positive, with no negatives being stated, that I just knew there was going to be a mid-review turnaround. If anything I was surprised (but relieved) how quickly the turn happened.
      It's like how in the first few years of House, the cold open was always the person you least expected getting sick, so by season 5 you just know it's going to be the healthiest person.

  • @nobodywantsthethimble
    @nobodywantsthethimble 4 ปีที่แล้ว +344

    I appreciate how even if SUSD doesn’t like a game, the reviews still feel rather glowing. Their love of the hobby just shines through.
    I really enjoy this game, though I’ve only played the solo variant so far. It was one that I was really hoping to teach my in-laws, but as they are a bit older, they don’t like games with a lot of reading involved, and with almost every card doing something different (and with such small print), this would be an automatic pass for them. Which is a shame, since this game is targeted directly at them with big, neon crosshairs.

    • @cutthr0atjake
      @cutthr0atjake 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Nobody Wants The Thimble You can't have seen their Scythe review then.

    • @unlimitedrabbit
      @unlimitedrabbit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Oceania expansion Automa is merciless, even on Eaglet difficulty. I've yet to win a single first place nectar bonus.

  • @Joshua_Tymchyn
    @Joshua_Tymchyn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    My mother and aunt (who are in their late 50's) have not only played and enjoyed this game, but they've gone through two copies of the score pad already and show no signs of stopping. This is a fantastic review and I agree with a lot of the points brought up, but it can definitely be an entry game depending on the person you try to introduce it to.

  • @AzraelCC
    @AzraelCC 4 ปีที่แล้ว +430

    Great review and a delightful conclusion. I have only one criticism: where is worm Matt and why isn't there a skit involving worm Matt being eaten by a bird?

    • @Managarm
      @Managarm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This would be soooo good! Maybe as an extra once meeting is considered more responsible again...

    • @Robmonster
      @Robmonster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      He was eaten by a bird before they could film the skit.

    • @johnivanoplimo5172
      @johnivanoplimo5172 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Robmonster Press F to pay respects.

    • @cally77777
      @cally77777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I think the clue is annoying neighbours DYIing due to lockdown boredom. I would assume Worm Matt is social distancing down some hole in space-time.

  • @contra1212
    @contra1212 4 ปีที่แล้ว +230

    This is a masterful review. I own Wingspan and played many times, usually enjoying it. But there was always something beneath the surface that was gnawing at me. You've managed to dissect it completely, picking up all the points that annoyed me before I realised that they did. While at the same time explaining the rules and gameplay clearly within a couple of minutes, and showing what's to like or dislike about the game. Work of genius this review.

    • @lisadefries6718
      @lisadefries6718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      My son bought it for me for Christmas. It’s a truly beautiful game. I have played bird sounds via phone while playing. I found whole game refreshing and a treat primarily because I just loved the appearance and enjoyed building up my collection of favourite birds . Today my son and I played and to our mutual confusion he won by a small margin. I had eggs on my birds and acquired food tokens on birds some quite high point birds etc and most of my board filled but he won without eggs and with slightly less birds and what at first glance looked like similar point. I also won most of rounds..... basically it didn’t seem right.... I don’t mind loosing but it’s feels strange when you believe and your opponent thinks you just won to discover you’ve lost😮
      But there’s always next time 🙂

  • @acerumble4991
    @acerumble4991 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I believe that others have mentioned in various ways, but I heartily appreciate Quinns' ability to project enthusiasm and wonder for a game that he himself may not care for if he sees value in it for others. That level of empathy is the mark of a high-functioning human being

  • @andywlasniewski6810
    @andywlasniewski6810 4 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    I find the puzzle in Wingspan is to find out how to generate points in every turn. Food isn't (usually) worth points, but can I generate eggs, or tuck cards, or cache food while I'm getting it? There are a finite number of turns in the game, so how can I accomplish as much as possible with each turn? If you play a turn to just get food, or just lay eggs, or just gain cards it does seem boring. And yes, you don't always get the cards you need, but adapting to what's available is the main part of the game. The European Expansion helps a ton with variety and depth. Wingspan was my family's gateway game because we are birdwatchers. It has led us into the hobby from a place of obliviousness, and if that's all it accomplished it would be a great game.

    • @Buffalodude1
      @Buffalodude1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats awesome!

    • @vrbalance2686
      @vrbalance2686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes took me several games and realized it's a puzzle. Instead of getting frustrated at what I couldn't do I realized there must be something I can be doing to generate points. Last game I realized I was not going to catch up but had a crazy egg laying engine of 6 eggs so just laid eggs for final 3 turns and won because of egg points.

    • @LMKlees
      @LMKlees 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats why i didnt like the game personally it biasts being an engine builder but in reality you are heavily restricted in what you can do. In the end I own Seasons for that specifically. Unfortunately Seasons theme sucks compaired to wingspan.

  • @maxranch5912
    @maxranch5912 4 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    There are not many who teaches you excited a game that they dont love :D

  • @sussudiokim
    @sussudiokim 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Awwww, watching these falcons grow up on your roof reminds me of my childhood. The chilly mornings when mother would bring back a warm corpse for us to devour. Great times.

  • @ericfrancis7816
    @ericfrancis7816 4 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    That's a fair take. Myself, I like Wingspan quite a bit and can happily ignore some of the shortcomings that gave Quinns kittens (like the disconnect with the theme). But I respect his reasoning and, as always, appreciate the thought and time that go into SUSD reviews.

    • @revimfadli4666
      @revimfadli4666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I thought the theme-mechanic connection is a mixed bag; on one hand, you have disconnects like mentioned in the video, but on the other hand, card effects often match the bird's real-life traits

  • @reinboldwilliam
    @reinboldwilliam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    "Big as a man, eating garbage." Is my new description on my Tinder profile.

  • @Direksone
    @Direksone 4 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    We typically house rule a 'draft' at the start of the game that I saw people do online when drawing the birds. Takes a bit of the randomness and feelsbad moment away. I do also miss that there is not a lot of interaction between players. Perhaps an expansion can take care of it? Overall I do really enjoy playing the game.

    • @FosukeLordOfError
      @FosukeLordOfError 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That sounds like a great idea, a couple of my gamer friends are big into drafting as it is

    • @RobertAcurso
      @RobertAcurso 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Could you elaborate on how you do the draft? Sounds like a great idea.

    • @DanielRothhaar
      @DanielRothhaar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@RobertAcurso Draw 5 birds, keep one, pass the other four, keep one, pass the other three, and so on until everyone has 5 cards.

    • @SanjuroSan
      @SanjuroSan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      We do the same and we also draft 3x of the bonus scoring cards after we select our birds. Our games are much more tight and enjoyable.

    • @Direksone
      @Direksone 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RobertAcurso Exactly what Daniel says!

  • @PotatoMcWhiskey
    @PotatoMcWhiskey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +222

    I am a big fan of bird girth after watching this review on 2x speed.

    • @ian4175
      @ian4175 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      PotatoMcWhiskey Wait, you have interests other than Civ? I don’t believe it.

    • @district_re
      @district_re 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Whoa! I just discovered your Civ6 videos yesterday, and now I've scrolled into the comments on this boardgame video and found your name! Mind: blown!

    • @kyleparker613
      @kyleparker613 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I love your civ videos Potato! Thank you for the content.

    • @realkingofwales3917
      @realkingofwales3917 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I did that to!

    • @marxussy
      @marxussy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Oh hello there

  • @xForceCh0keYou
    @xForceCh0keYou 4 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Lol, the end is nice, cute little bird family growing...then you realize the mom is tearing a pigeon apart and feeding it to her children

    • @geerstyresoil3136
      @geerstyresoil3136 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      yup, birds are mini raptors with feathers.

    • @JEcklar
      @JEcklar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@geerstyresoil3136 Raptors had feathers, my good man! Birds are dinosaurs who perfected flying! :D

  • @bwah9481
    @bwah9481 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    “This is a game about playing some kind of dark timeline version of Dr Dolittle trying to trap birds in a pyramid scheme.”
    That’s the Quinns I love.

  • @Squiddy00
    @Squiddy00 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Watched some SUSD videos, stopped to unbox and play the copy of Wingspan that arrived earlier today, sit back down to find this video had released while I was gone.
    I feel _personally_ attacked.

    • @MrDharda
      @MrDharda 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I would not worry, the game is amazing. Unless you wanted a competitive worker placement game, Wingspan is not that as he said. It's about doing each one a solitaire at the same time and then seeing how good you did compare to others. It's not as much as who wins this game, as who can get the highest score ever. And as soon as you understand the minors of the game it's great seeing the awesome new combos your friends have discover. If you understood that before buying it, you will love it. To anyone with doubts about liking or not the game I recommend Rahdo's Runs Through. He did amazing explaining me exactly why I needed this game in my collection and he wasn't wrong.

    • @Cergorach
      @Cergorach 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Be save in the feeling that he isn't attacking you personally, he's attacking every fool that loves Wingspan! ;-) It looks interesting, but I totally get his explanation on playing this with mom...

    • @jeremywhite92
      @jeremywhite92 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Eh. I think Quinns wrong about this one. Wingspan is a great game, with good replayablity, and attractive enough to encourage your non-gamer friends to sit down and enjoy it.

    • @wm1pyro604
      @wm1pyro604 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      you're allowed to like Wingspan lol. I own a few games thanks to susd, even though they did't recommend them.

    • @LMKlees
      @LMKlees 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Id say dont let other peoples oppinions ruin your experience. I like Sentinels of the multiverse but still agree with their review of it. If you play it and don't like it that's one thing. Don't let yourself fall victim to inclusiveness bias. Just because people dont like what you like doesn't make you any less of a gamer or collector.

  • @blaizerhodes
    @blaizerhodes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "Indolent chicken nuggets that pass for birds in New Zealand... " .. nice

  • @alexhuddleston3950
    @alexhuddleston3950 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I find it delightful how Quinns can go from brilliant lines like 'some sort of ovoid cashback' to dad jokes like 'assembled the aviangers' in pretty much the same sentence.

  • @jasonmatthews2935
    @jasonmatthews2935 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I have been watching a TON of reviews during this Covid-19 time. Yours was one of the finest, well thought out reviews I have seen. I don't really agree with the conclusion. I think its because I don't really worry about winning so much as I enjoy building my Avian-egg-maximizinator. But I followed your logic all the way through, and agree with the points individually, but not in their sum. Thank you for the deep analysis.

  • @rossmclatchie3431
    @rossmclatchie3431 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I really love the SUSD reviews, but funnily, I often find myself disagreeing with them. Some of my favourite games tend to get good but less than glowing reviews (Wingspan. Scythe, Marvel Champions), while others I'm not so keen on (Fog of Love) get the highest praise. But I love the way the reviews are constructed, and the opinions put across, because I can see what it is about those games that they dislike/like and it's put in such a way that I often agree with those points, it's just that they have more or less impact on my personal enjoyment of the game.

  • @GeekCroftGamers
    @GeekCroftGamers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Great review - - the “your engine blows in the open” articulated well the fuzzy feeling I had. Still, I would play again, just to roll in the bling and visual delight.

  • @collin7776
    @collin7776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    You succinctly explained my feeling of the game, the RNG feels bad in this game. I like RNG in a game like Nemesis, because even if you're on the bad end at least you're part of a story. Wingspan is a beautiful game but I get more enjoyment in looking at the cards and feeling the paper quality of the manual than the game itself. Highly highly recommend Race for the Galaxy as well.

    • @pipos193
      @pipos193 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      RNG is not really SUCH a factor in this game. With all these variables, it's up to every player to make the best out of the available options. I've played over 100 games, introduced many friends and family to the hobby, and no one has ever complained that they lost because of the RNG or that it's too complicated.

    • @Iamwrongbut
      @Iamwrongbut 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Filippos Farmakis you’ve played 100 games and never got screwed by your beginning cards? If you draw a hand of expensive cards (2+ food to play), and there are no cheap ones showing, it sets you at a severe disadvantage if other players get a bird that gives a wheat every time it’s activated, or that allows them to draw 2 bird cards etc. There have been multiple games I’ve played where my opponents have asked to restart the game because they felt their hands where unfairly good starting off compared with others. The RNG is SO important on the first few turns. Especially since there is no true catch-up mechanic built into the game.

    • @collin7776
      @collin7776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Iamwrongbut yup that happens too many times, in a sense it's almost a good thing as it levels the playing field. My wife has managed to win about 30% against group of life long max/min dedicated players.

    • @sybrwookie
      @sybrwookie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@collin7776 That doesn't level the playing field as it's just as likely for your wife to get screwed by bad luck as everyone else.

    • @rmsgrey
      @rmsgrey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@sybrwookie If every player is as likely to get screwed by RNG as every other player, that sounds like a pretty level playing field to me...

  • @emmawhitt9363
    @emmawhitt9363 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    i understand the top 3 bird list, i really do, and i respect all 3 birds very much. But i do shed a tear for the lack of the raven, the poster bird for my goth people

    • @Quinns_Quest
      @Quinns_Quest 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I hear you. Raven (or another corvid) would be a shoe-in for the number 4 slot

    • @SkylluszYn
      @SkylluszYn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Quinns_Quest Never been so relieved to see an addendum in the comments.

    • @varianor
      @varianor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Quinn's list of the top 3 birds is a global list. Wingspan started with just North American and South American birds... I'd be curious what his list from the birds in the game would be.

  • @2CrowStudios
    @2CrowStudios 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Love the Race For the Galaxy shoutout, personally one of my favorite games to bring out that doesn't take all day to setup/play.

  • @LindirTheGreen
    @LindirTheGreen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The point at 12:40 is incredibly astute. If you get dealt bad cards at the start and you complain about it at the end after the game is over, it's boring and lame for everyone. If you take a gamble and it openly blows up in your face it's awesome and fun.

  • @NestorMandela
    @NestorMandela 4 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    I tried to see what was all the hype about and feel like you. There's no meaningful (on porpouse) interaction between players, RNG can screw you really bad, there're a lot of factor to take intto account, you don't know if you're winnning or not, etc. But the worst thing (unforgiveable to me) is that sometimes one player just have a shitty engine and spend the whole game wasting turns when the other have fun with combos. I played with two friends and one was totally screw, albeit I had fun I don't want to witness the same scenario again. But yes, the game is VERY beautiful.

    • @Balsiefen
      @Balsiefen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I used to spell purpose like you. Spellcheck always corrected it to porpoise.

    • @eligra
      @eligra 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is pretty true, but I still kinda like it. Even the Tabletop Simulator version is alright to me. In many ways it feels kinda meh (and even blergh if you get bad cards), but I like to play it.

  • @bobbler42
    @bobbler42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I call ravens for smarts, robins for helping in the garden, and kiwis for being weird badgers.

  • @tehwicked1
    @tehwicked1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I know I'm late to the party but I felt compelled to say that this is one of my favorite TH-cam videos... ever. Top 5 at least. You have an amazing ability to narrate these videos and your insight is fantastic. Thank you for this and all the videos you create. Thank you, sir.

  • @justintan3417
    @justintan3417 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    For some reason when you said "this is a real troubling creature" so matter-of-factly I burst out laughing. I enjoyed the nature programming in this review!

  • @mooks4751
    @mooks4751 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    First Root and now Wingspan... I am inexplicably wounded

  • @sloopdoopyh1493
    @sloopdoopyh1493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is legitimately one of the best and most well written reviews on your channel! Great work!

  • @MotiviqueStudio
    @MotiviqueStudio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really loved the outro here. I also loved the amount of enthusiasm given to a game the reviewer wasn't personally thrilled about, that still showed how it might be a lot of fun for people for whom it might resonate more.

  • @JackingtonKensington
    @JackingtonKensington 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Nesting Peregrine Falcons? That sounds like an unbelievable dream!

  • @m00npie
    @m00npie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I honestly feel like I’m missing something every time I play a game (multiple times, mind you) that I don’t particularly care for while everyone else unabashedly sings its praises. It’s comforting to know that I’m not alone, although I do wish I enjoyed this gorgeous gem of a game more. :)

  • @ClarkPotter
    @ClarkPotter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Before you pulled up RFTG at the end, I had the thought, "You're describing RftG perfectly here, but the odds are exceedingly slim you are actually thinking of that game and about to plop it out."
    BUT THEN YOU DID!!
    I loved your channel already, but now I trust your taste forever. RftG is fantastic and surprisingly deep, altho it may take 20-50 plays to really figure out how to play it, all the while being accessible and easy to teach and ostensibly random.
    For RftG fans or those interested, even though it seems so random, and it is, over many games, the randomness converges to very low. I had played 1000 games of it vs. the AI, and my friend had played 300 vs. it. When he and I played, I managed to beat him in 32 of 33 games.
    It's like Rummy 500. Once you know the secret, you become hella strong. If you think RftG is mostly solitaire, then you don't know the secret and aren't hella strong at it.
    Thx for mentioning RftG as great. Bc it so is.

  • @danrabin1784
    @danrabin1784 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lovely review, as always!
    Peregrine falcons are gorgeous birds. My first year at university I lived on the 18th floor of an 18-floor dormitory. The university had a camera set up to watch the Peregrine that decided to nest on the roof. Beautiful bird (and chicks) but not fun to hear them screeching at 4 in the morning nearly everyday. Especially since, lucky me, the nest was right above my window! It was lovely to see them fly off towards the river, however, right from my room.

  • @StillIt
    @StillIt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Don't insult our birds!. . . . . It's all we have haha

  • @ArmyPrint
    @ArmyPrint 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "A cross between a tasty stew and an excel spreadsheet" spells out so simply why I love board games

  • @SamYoumansS6R16Y
    @SamYoumansS6R16Y 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "These birds have skills, like, Napoleon Dynamite!" Thank you for that wonderful reference!

  • @vladimirkramnik347
    @vladimirkramnik347 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a beautiful, adorable, and wholesome ending. Really put a smile on my face.

  • @nanogibbon
    @nanogibbon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have to admit, I was watching the end of this review with tense excitement waiting for Quinns to bring out Race for the Galaxy, and was not disappointed by the delicious frisson when he did.
    Good review! Very fair.

  • @marshallchaney8845
    @marshallchaney8845 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    I'm a fan of Wingspan, but I do appreciate the way Quinns dug into the disconnect between theme and rules. I'd be really interested to see somebody examine Race for the Galaxy in the same way. Does that theme fit better with the engine-building mechanics, or do we not look that closely because space isn't a novel theme for a board game?

    • @Spelpojken
      @Spelpojken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ofc. And many of the faults being named here are the same in Race (yeah I can see that I only produced on two planets and you on five). And E.H. favorite game is Race. That’s the game Wingspan is more or less “based” on.
      I love Race, more then wingspan, but I wonder If that’s just bc it’s sci-fi.
      I can say with certainty that in my main game group, Wingspan is by far the more preferred game to get to the table.

    • @drwtng
      @drwtng 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good point. To me, the disconnect hit me when we started spending eggs as a resource... my simple brain could not parse the logic...

    • @simonadams
      @simonadams 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Likely. The problem for Wingspan is that it is excessively praised for an 'accessible' theme often without critical assessment of whether the theme is actually implemented well. I don't think I've ever heard someone say anything positive of negative about Race's theme, but that's because Race is not trying to be thematic. It's just simple mechanical brilliance.

    • @jamez62982
      @jamez62982 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@drwtng Birds come out of eggs, how about that? 🎉😅

    • @simpelton524
      @simpelton524 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@drwtng you're not spending them as resources, they're hatching into new birds.

  • @DevilboyScooby
    @DevilboyScooby ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love how much you put into your reviews even if you don't like the game. And the fact you've clearly played a few games , not just one then written it off as a bad job. That plus humour makes this the best board game review channel on YT, imho.

  • @airync3583
    @airync3583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I used this game to introduce my parents to modern board games on a visit at Christmas and now they are absolutely hooked. They waited 6 months for a copy of it to arrive at their local small town games shop and purchased other games in the mean time. It might not be perfect, but I love it and am really glad they loved it too as I am really excited for my next visit as I will be packing mostly board games for our enjoyment.

  • @danielpiotrowski4946
    @danielpiotrowski4946 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    My girlfriend says I only buy games that su&sd review, so I bought wingspan 2 months ago. And here we are...

    • @squish1504
      @squish1504 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Daniel Piotrowski I’ll take your copy of Wingspan then...

  • @chrisclark784
    @chrisclark784 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I love your reviews, because you guys portray even games you dislike in a way that can let really defensive people off easy. I like the game, but I am glad to hear opposite opinions, because glowing reviews always make me hesitant. I do agree spending bird eggs to attract other birds is bizarre.

    • @rickadam6051
      @rickadam6051 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Those eggs hatched, and you trade those babies to a non-playable character's aviary to get one you didn't have in exchange for yours :)

  • @jasonnewell7036
    @jasonnewell7036 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for putting into words my main issue with Wingspan as a game, the lack of agency in building your engine.
    I got distracted by your bookshelf, listening to your take on Wingspan, when suddenly my brain goes, "Ooh, he's got Elfquest books!"

  • @dragondai912
    @dragondai912 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is one of my favorite reviews because it was absolutely insanely hilarious. Thanks for the laughs.

  • @besaevik
    @besaevik 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Funny that this video turned up as I’ve been recently contemplating buying wingspan or not..:)

  • @petemagnuson7357
    @petemagnuson7357 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I would like to sign up for more bird name ASMR please and thank you.

  • @foxy_miki9978
    @foxy_miki9978 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ahh man I been wanting you to review this FOREVER! Just got the game in the mail today.

  • @bleproxursox
    @bleproxursox 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i had to pause this video after you revealed your top 3 birds because i was suddenly overwhelmed with how much i love pigeons. thank you, fellow pigeon advocate

  • @camsy83
    @camsy83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I'm glad I already had Wingspan before this review. I really enjoy it and never would have bought it if I'd seen this first

    • @lisadefries6718
      @lisadefries6718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was a gift for Christmas and I love it. So does my son.
      I also got azul which is great and my latest favourite everdell and root....can a person have too many games? ...assuming you can get in front door 😂🤣😂🤣

    • @MussoGames
      @MussoGames 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lisadefries6718 I keep asking this question, but another Kallax shelf later, I think the answer is no if you have the room 😂

    • @WuschelofDespair
      @WuschelofDespair 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lisadefries6718 yes, boardgamers tend to hoard more and more games, more than they have actually time to play for. I try to keep my collection small but classy. My „prev owned“ list on BGG is longer than my owned list and I don’t regret that, I have games I really enjoy and play often.

  • @brningpyre
    @brningpyre 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When you can't hear the neighbours while Quinn talks about them, it just makes him seem like a lunatic, LOL.

  • @JoeyOstrander
    @JoeyOstrander 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the best review I've found for a deck of playing cards featuring illustrated birds. I'm sold.

  • @Ragoom_
    @Ragoom_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Came for the review, stayed for the Crokinole board cameo.

  • @razvanambarus7905
    @razvanambarus7905 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So quick commentary : spotted owl is great as are most birds that give bonus cards in the end (getting one per game allows you to narrow your strategy focusing on cards that fullfill you mission and help you on board strategy , so the game becomes less fumbly) - 5 points, 2 bonus cards usually you manage to get points out of one of them, either the low tier or the high points. My record is getting 24 points out of 4 bonus cards which was quite cool. Also prothonotary has a 8 point value, 4 egg space and as all cards, playing it gives you acces to better rewards from that particular row.
    Also you don't destroy eggs, they hatch into a new bird. Some birds lay 5 eggsout of wich only one survives. So egg curency mechanic is solid. Bird lays egg. Egg hatches - lose egg , gain bird duh. Clearly not paying eggs for the first bird solves the problem of who came first the purple egg or the Troglodytes Troglodytes, also know as a cute af eurasian wren.

    • @mirunacaragheorgheopol8442
      @mirunacaragheorgheopol8442 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Heh, this almossst makes sense: the eggs hatch but you get a different species of bird =))) maybe it's bird pokemon card exchange in the backmatter.
      I should add that even if you aren't extremely fortunate in terms of card draws, you still get to see at least 3 other cards you can choose (if another player doesn't nick it), so you can start crafting tactics. Focusing on your initial bonus cards and high value cards (in terms of points) is also a valid strategy, and I think I won two times without having an extremely functional engine, but by fulfilling point-enriching conditions and by having no bird worth less that 4 points.

    • @johnmaddox3435
      @johnmaddox3435 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mirunacaragheorgheopol8442 this. I love that my game isn't always optimal or spelled out. I think it's great that you have to adapt to every game based on what is available to you. It's exciting to have a friend have a clean engine (Raven/killdeer) and your seemingly weak engine wins/competes in the end because you optimized in surprising ways.

    • @razvanambarus7905
      @razvanambarus7905 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnmaddox3435 yep and then you re the one with the clean engine, you get cocky and fail utterly. Been there done that.

  • @gamingpond
    @gamingpond 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This was a fantastic review that went in depth about all things that both make this game great and where it falls short, I really appreciate you daring to take a different stance than the myriad of reviews that think this game is pretty and works alright and leave it at that. You also ended with a recommendation for my favourite game, so bonus points for that!

  • @gianlucamuscolinolluch8263
    @gianlucamuscolinolluch8263 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ''These birds have skills, like Napoleon Dynamite''
    Just hilarious

  • @jumalphas
    @jumalphas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A little thing we do to make it less random : we draw 10 cards at the beginning. The rule doesn't change : you still keep 5 (cards + ressources) total. But you have more choice.

  • @Wirddesigns
    @Wirddesigns 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    as family game its great even my 7 year old gets the game and plays well.

    • @CarbonBasedRainForm
      @CarbonBasedRainForm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I encountered a problem with grown-ass men throwing the eggs off the table when i was trying to teach the game, so I'm surprised kids can sit through it

  • @tolkienfan4ever
    @tolkienfan4ever 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wingspan is one of my favorite games. To each his/her own, I guess...

  • @Duskraven377
    @Duskraven377 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This, along with Tokaido and Takenoko, are one of the few board games I play just to relax. No competitiveness. Just eggs and birbs and food. When my friends finish playing, then we go "Oh yeah, there's points. Let's see who wins!"

  • @qarsiseer
    @qarsiseer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s funny, you say you don’t want to introduce it to your mom, but my mom introduced me to Wingspan. She and I love it the most out of my family and talk about it all the time.

  • @ToddGretencord
    @ToddGretencord 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks for this review. This is the sort of commentary that keeps me coming back to you guys. The world needs more thoughtful criticism without any malice. There are not may writers working in the scene who could sell a game, to the right audience, whilst simultaneously (and no less successfully) steering people away. Well done.
    I'm not a fan of this either and I feel almost guilty for it considering how universally liked it is. It is a gorgeous thing and has a lot to like, unfortunately the game play leaves me cold.

  • @matthewovall112
    @matthewovall112 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    As always an extremely well thought out and fair review. My inner child still feels attacked though.

  • @IronSalamander8
    @IronSalamander8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just now noticed the Elfquest books on the shelf! I love that series so much, especially the original parts with the Wolfriders fleeing the burning Holt, meeting the Sun folk, and the Gliders and so on! :D

  • @dj1jesus375
    @dj1jesus375 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I didn't expect to laugh so much! Again, fantastic review, I am very impressed!

  • @ThePirateParrot
    @ThePirateParrot 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    This game is for those of us who don't really like super "interactive" or competitive games. I get why some people don't like it but this is one of our favourites.

    • @Weldingization
      @Weldingization 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The review never mounts "the game isn't competitive enough" as an argument for not recommending it, though?

    • @Iamwrongbut
      @Iamwrongbut 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You like to play solo games next to other people? That’s how I feel this game is, unless someone happens to take one of the 3 bird cards that are face-up.

    • @mrpeach32
      @mrpeach32 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Iamwrongbut I'm not the same person, but yes: I like playing solo games next to each other.

    • @sybrwookie
      @sybrwookie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The lack of interaction is not the main problem here.
      The game has no theme. No, "birds" isn't a theme. What are you playing as? Why are the birds you played working together? Why are the birds laying eggs in each others' nests all the time? Why are other players' birds giving me food? It's pretty drawings of birds.
      The gameplay is terrible. You either luck into an engine or you sit there watching the person who did luck into an engine do 4x what you possibly can on every turn.
      The game lasts 2x as long as it should for a game this light.
      The downtime between players is ridiculous and given how the board state can drastically change, there is no way to effectively plan your turn unless it's a turn which does not care at all about the board state. So you just sit there, bored, looking at pretty pictures of birds, wondering how much more fun you could be having if you were outside looking at them for real instead.

  • @timgrebin
    @timgrebin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Minor error Quinns - you pulled that handbrake turn with your right hand and that means you are driving a left hand drive car which on UK roads is not very safe as you will find it more difficult to have good visibility of the road. Thank you.

    • @BigRenz13
      @BigRenz13 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They live in Canada so he is correct! Haha

  • @sarahgobrecht669
    @sarahgobrecht669 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You must try wingspan on the switch. All the fiddling is done by the console. Beautiful and relaxing music and nature bird sounds.

  • @lukas9827
    @lukas9827 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That last clip where the falcon family feeds on the poor pigeon... that's something I was not expecting seeing today :)

  • @lostmarble540
    @lostmarble540 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Literally all of the animals in Quinns' 3 Worst Birds list are excellent and idk what he's going on about.

  • @freddypowell7292
    @freddypowell7292 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm pretty sure that the cassowary is on record having killed adult humans, and is known for being quite dangerous.

    • @JEcklar
      @JEcklar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let's go with the Eurasian Eagle Owl being one of the few FLIGHTED birds to have killed an adult human. :) (Ostriches have killed quite a few humans, too.)

  • @DevilboyScooby
    @DevilboyScooby ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "A dark timeline version of Dr Doolittle, trying to trap birds in a pyramid scheme" That should be the tagline! 🤣🤣🤣

  • @ToddCarter
    @ToddCarter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This review is one of the funniest I think your channel has produced. I laughed especially at the mom being a liar and when you made fun of New Zealand birds and your lists of favorite and least favorite birds. Great stuff. I really like wingspan and wish I could show this video to people to convince them to play it! Ha. Still, hope you keep up the good work.

  • @Nico-ml5eg
    @Nico-ml5eg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Thank you! Finally someone else who's not a major fan of this game. I thought I was the only one in the world. I love birds, production of this game is amazing, but I just don't enjoy playing this...

    • @lazer888134134
      @lazer888134134 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I’m with you man! Never really got a great game with at it

    • @GadBoDag
      @GadBoDag 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I feel vindicated... I was worried they would love it.

    • @john1kavanagh
      @john1kavanagh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm so glad that this is a voiced opinion. I can see Wingspan looks nice with the production and art, but there are things that are jarring about it. The egg "currency" is one to me - it never made sense - or the communal dice feeder - why? I don't get why someone is allowed to reroll when they are same thematically although I understand mechanically the need to, but the biggest issue for me was the sheer luck with the cards. I know people talk about drafting at the beginning to mitigate some of this luck. But early on if someone has a card, i mean bird, that allows you to tuck something under or cache something on top, they can run away with the game. It is the luck with the cards/food "dice" that ruins it for me. I know it is not always about winning, but I have played so many games of Wingspan where at round 2 I was just treading water whilst others took off. However, it seems I'm in the minority and I appreciate that this is out of step with a great many...

    • @Trevin_Taylor
      @Trevin_Taylor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nico finally? Haven’t been on the internet in 2 years, I see.

    • @squish1504
      @squish1504 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      john1kavanagh very odd. I’ve won so many times against a lot of people “tucking” or “caching” cards through use of bonuses and birds that allow extra bonus cards.

  • @Superflydanfry
    @Superflydanfry 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I actually did end up teaching my parents about this game, and while some of the actions for them are a bit tedious, it's the one game that they really enjoy coming back to because of the engine building. it may take some time and some assistance on certain turns, but it's one of the games in a shared collection where they feel compelled to come back because it feels like we're learning something every time we play it.
    I will say that the box really underestimates the playtime, but it's otherwise a lovely game to play

  • @washijo229
    @washijo229 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My wife and I have the same conflicting feelings. She loves the theme and puzzle, while I feel the pain of wanting a solid plan and failing at drawing. Also, I love the egg analogy of "Push! Push!" You guys are brilliant.

  • @nicolaspetroselli2989
    @nicolaspetroselli2989 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "This is a game about playing some kind of dark timeline version of Dr. Doolittle, trying to trap birds in a pyramid scheme."
    I really love this channel.

  • @iamspamus8784
    @iamspamus8784 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This was the best game of 2019 (for me)!!! It is amazing. I was so surprised. I should not like it, but it captivated me. I loved it from the first few turns of my first game. I got to it late, probably Dec 2019. Now I've played it 9 times or so, the pandemic having lessened my ability to play. I have the European expansion, which is very good. The extra round end bonuses add a lot. I will get the Oceania one too. It has gone through the second printing already. The third printing is due out in July 2020, I think. I have some co-workers who are waiting for that. All in all, a solid 9 or 9.5 out of 10 for me!!!
    I did add in the wooden food and bird tokens, but that just made it better.

  • @pm71241
    @pm71241 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I love SU&SD for these occasional brilliant insights ... I couldn't have said it better about why Point Salad is rarely a good thing.

    • @TheShapingSickness
      @TheShapingSickness 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But most games are point salads

    • @Accatitippi
      @Accatitippi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@TheShapingSickness No, they aren't. I'd say that most games have 1-3 ways to score points. In wingspan, I think literally everything can be worth points!

  • @veerchasm1
    @veerchasm1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THIS is the video I needed to see. I’ve been on the fence about this game. Great job

  • @IstasPumaNevada
    @IstasPumaNevada 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Calming, relaxing video of pigeon devouring at the end there. :D

  • @Dracinard
    @Dracinard 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "So now I've disgorged all of those hyperlatives, you probably think this is going to be a glowing review..."
    Oh, this isn't my first rodeo.

  • @steveholmes11
    @steveholmes11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I think you've nailed my feeling about another game. Visiting a friend I was asked "Want to play a card game". It was called "Race for the galaxy" and after 30 minutes explaining the rules I sat drawing cards while the home team were making elaborate shapes with theirs and doing multiple things every turn. There appeared to be no player - player interaction and no way back form a "bad starting hand".

    • @danibee535
      @danibee535 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      it's mentioned at the end of this review in glowing terms :) it's a difficult game. took me a good few goes to get into it at all and i'm still not that good at it (or maybe my friends are just particularly excellent). but it is a classic for a reason and well worth another go or two. with experience, your starting hand doesn't dictate your performance at all really.

    • @chayashida
      @chayashida 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, RftG is random, but after I learned that good players can play there way out of a bad starting hand, I syatted to realize there was a different level of play to that game.
      There was a guy that wrote a neural net that learned how to play well - it's what the ios and Android apps is based on. And it's really good at the game.
      Race for the Galaxy wouldn't be a game I teach to a friend that was just getting into board games - it's harder than Wingspan - but it is a great game and a classic if all players are willing to invest the time to learn and get good at it. But that can take hundreds of plays...

  • @TheVisualante
    @TheVisualante ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a great review thank you! Even though it’s not a recommendation from you I actually walked away wanting to play it simply by your review. I didn’t understand the hype around this and this is the first review that actually got me interested in the game. Thank you!

  • @frankbraker
    @frankbraker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU for turning me on to Race For The Galaxy.

  • @SaoPauloOrBust
    @SaoPauloOrBust 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bird fan
    Open up your game
    Open up your box
    Open up your shelf
    Never never gonna sell it
    Bird fan
    Flap it all away
    Draw some extra cards
    Gotta make some points
    Gotta make a million
    Bird fan
    You got it wrong
    Some long time critic's gonna lose it
    In the end who's a fool
    Seagulls
    Are a species
    in this game
    the real lyrics
    to this song
    mention seagulls

  • @ehhhsteve8582
    @ehhhsteve8582 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is an excellent review of Wingspan, a game I absolutely love. You are spot on with the luck element. In a 2 player game it isn’t as noticeable since you can better telegraph your turn; but a stroke of good luck can greatly swing the game in your favor. I don’t notice the bad luck as much, though, since we can usually get between 75-85 points reliably. I disagree on the theme. Wildlife habitat management says to manage for plants that will produce or attract the food which in turn attracts the birds. Diversity leads to diversity so I have no problems with the theme from that standpoint.

  • @no_name9906
    @no_name9906 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shut up and siti down is the Top Gear of boardgame reviews....just need the Stig

  • @Poseidon1197
    @Poseidon1197 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been looking to get my hands on this for so long!! hearing the review definitely scares me a bit, but I'm hoping my built up excitement makes up for the RNG aspects you don't enjoy. Thanks for the honest review!!