Seeing such an experienced pilot who presumably also has more simulator time than most, duck a little as his plane in the simulator goes under the bridge, is so relatable that it is funny. During that segment I was basically thinking "Yeah, I could do that if it was Ace Combat (or Project Wingman :D)". Then I see him duck a little and I immediately think "And I actually would do that playing Ace Combat". edit: it is at 48:17 (thanks to goatmeal5241 for pointing out that I hadn't put a timestamp.)
I fly FPV quadcopters and I find myself ducking as I fly under a tree branch. If any of you get a chance to try flying FPV, I suggest you take it. It really provides a sensation of flight much more than a simulator.
@@Kenneth_James I feel like he gave all the info that was declassified. It's a missile with wings that folded out and looked like a tomahawk. The rocket fuel and explosives were covered and how they got from underwater to cruising speed. V1 and V2 was the inspiration. Werner Von Braun was a genius that was held hostage by Hitler. Werner was the reason we were able to leave the planet. Back then Dayton airbase was area 51 before Roswell.
Oh my gosh!!! I use to watch this show way back in the days, the early 2000s!!! Satellite TV just came out and we had so many channels, History, History international, and the Military Channel. I would watch these 3 channels all the time!!! Watching this is nostalgic!!
calm down - it was 2006. for reference. Torrents were widely in use. PVR had been in use for 5 years. Satellite TV had been widely available for 16 years.
I used to work for an excavation company. I don't think most people really understand what it takes to get more than a meter (or a few feet) into the ground, let alone 30x further. The best thing I can say is to look at the wooden pilings that are used on docks. A moderately sized wooden pile is roughly the diameter of a Tomahawk missile and will have a tapered end as well. Now watch a pile driver in action. Look how much work it takes to move it down just a small amount. Obviously this isn't a 1:1 comparison, but it will hammer the point home. (and never be sorry for your puns)
I was hoping for more of a modern , honest, comparison of our misses vs our enekies We must be far behind. Israel iron dome turned out to be not so dome & Russia has nukes in orbit . My expectations for an honest, modern, comparison were foolishly high
Considering this is a TV show, you should have known that going in. If you want more detailed information, I would advise seeking out declassified technical manuals and training videos or online communities that have experience working in the industry.
Excellent video and taught me some historical things. I was involved in development of the AGM-138 JASSM, and it became a very successful program. It flew high because it was stealthy. This conserved fuel (no weaving) for longer range. It used a very accurate INS with GPS update. One bad thing in its development was the program manager. He chose not to utilize LMCO's Design Assurance group, which monitored the electronic and mechanical design techniques used by the engineers. It is essentially a cook book of best practices with two reviews. He thought it would incur additional costs. Boy was he wrong. His engineers, many were young, used whatever they thought was best. The result was so many glitches the prototype couldn't make it out of the lab. He was fired and a more DA friendly manager took over. The result was a stable system with very few glitches. They were quickly ironed out, and it had outstanding performance at the AF's test range (location withheld). Today there are several variants and multiple launch platforms. Ukraine sure could use some.
I was testing a new security system and opted to run a temporary 100' wire thru the kitchen and out a doorway to the outside phone box since that wire was missing. The house was full of IBM engineers (it was a demo house for the new IBM home automation system) and they all criticized me for doing this except for one white beard who cracked up and smacked me on the back for my ingenuity. He had worked on the first trials of the Tomahawk. He told me about how it was a huge challenge to make the missile work for the first time and how they would use duct tape and bailing wire if that's what it took. I had brought him back to those days decades ago.
The movie lasts 50 minutes, of which about 10 minutes are dedicated to the cruise missile itself. The rest focuses on the history of aviation, historical cutaways, and introductions to historical figures. Additionally, a few experiments with explosives are presented in a very simplistic manner, almost like for preschoolers. It’s a waste of time with a lot of filler content. There are many amateur channels that thoroughly analyze and explain the construction and functionality of avionics, navigation systems, and target tracking elements.
The Tomahawks we used in Desert Storm used TERCOM terrain matching navigation, now the Navy uses the Block III which uses military grade GPS antenna that is twice as accurate within 75 feet.
I've learned from working at an aluminum and copper recycling plant that aluminum isn't as flammable as magnesium dust from the aluminum being ground up was. Huge white explosion throwing 2 1500 pound doors 9 feet.
The Tomahawk Cruise Missile represents a significant advancement in missile technology, building on a rich legacy of engineering and scientific innovation that dates back to early rocket development. The evolution of missile technology can be traced through several key milestones, each contributing to the capabilities of modern systems like the Tomahawk. From V-2 Rocket, Redstone and Jupiter missiles, Cruise Missile Technology, Guided Missiles assisted by microcontrollers and sensors, and GPS satellites to stealth technology learned from hard lessons in the battles, everything paved the way to achieve such an incredible engineering feat. The Tomahawk Cruise Missile is a testament to the incredible engineering achievements that have evolved from early rocket technology. Its development reflects decades of innovation and adaptation, drawing on the lessons learned from historical milestones in missile and aerospace engineering.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
It said can hit its target within 10 meters LMFAO 😂😂😂😂😂😂 DUDE, it was being flown down ventilation shafts back in the Gulf war, today theres a version that deploys swords, FREAKING SWORDS to hit a single person.
@@Iamabot4708The kind that was just used to kill Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri.......Bin Laden's buddy. He was number 2, right below Bin Laden. After the U.S. left Afghanistan, he came back, with the Taliban's permission, went onto his porch to have his morning tea (a guy that I believe said it was coffee) for the 15th straight day at the same exact time he had for the previous 14 days, and "SHSHSHSSHWING!" His wife and several daughters came out onto the porch to find him chopped to pieces. Was also used in Iraq against that top Al-Quds forces guy from Iran.
An excellently composed and generally seemingly really informative video, but a documentary's weakest link is that the moment it is not accurate it loses their integrity. This has a UK voice voice-over but when we get to the V1 it starts to look like another edition of how the Americans won the war. (1) The idea that an American officer 'happened to be in the area' and had V1 material collected and shipped back to the US is totally ludicrous. (2) We (the British) largely through the work of Dr R.V. Jones, then the Chief Scientific Intelligence Officer to the Air Ministry, knew very well what was coming and probably knew the simple mechanism which caused the fuel cut-off and a resultant dive to the ground. And in any case, there is no way that that apparent action by a US Officer, or any other from another country for that matter, would be allowed such action is the stuff of a vivid imagination and if not that then a serious bending of facts. From that point on the credibility of any facts becomes debatable. LATER: No, as far as I am aware the Germans did not 'abandon' the weapon. Our advancing Allied ground forces forced the use of the V1 out of range and, unlike the V2, the launch sites had to be physically constructed. It became an impractical project.
@@Sir_Vantage Also the USSR is sort of a federation of nations that Soviet Russia re-intergraded after the Russian Civil War but they didn't really have autonomy like the US has.
I had to play it back a few times to be sure of what I was seeing, but at 9:20 the rocket guy has his scale clamped to the table. You would think a rocket scientist (I know, he's a physicist) could think of another way to fix a scale to a table.
Right off I see a deep fake, or image manipulation. The image they show at beginning with the giant hole was not of course caused by any cruise missile. That was a famous, or infamous strike on a bunker by an F-117. The allies struck it because it was being used as a planning location by Iraq's military intelligence and Sadam had been there at least once. But what they didn't know was at night it was being used by civilians. Thus when the BIG bomb not cruise missile hit, it killed many civilians. Like I said it was so famous an incident, no way these guys use it by mistake.
Ok, so now you're heading down a learning curve about how videos are made and what the term "stock footage" means. Is there a point behind it? Because you're not selling me on the "deep fake image manipulation" conspiracy nonsense, it's nothing more than someone who put images together from stock footage who doesn't know the background behind every image of a hole in the ground. Do you make your barber take your tinfoil hat off every time you get a haircut or do you leave it at home when you go there?
Every time i hear this guys voice it reminds me of the apprentice there is so much good in this weppons. like flying things to other places very fast. i wish the world can walk away from wars killings understand we are diffrent from each other and try to have are own way and let others have theres. to say no to wars. if all of us say no to war then what can anyone do the onces that suffer? is everyone. there are no winners in war everyone losses
5:30 "most rockets are powered by liquid fuel" eh no, no they aren't - not even close. Really big ones are, but a cruise missile isn't big in that context. Even the space shuttle boosters are solid.
Plenty of modern weapons use black powder in a detonation or launch train. That's because it explodes instead of burns, and it's cheap but most importantly it's reliable making it ideal for triggering a detonation train or the ignition train of some sort of propellant.
@@dukecraig2402 Black powder burns, all chemical explosives burn, they burn rapidly. It is a redox reaction with Potassium Nitrate as oxidizer, sulfur and charcoal as fuels. But black powder is a low explosive, it does not detonate, it deflagrates, meaning the speed of combustion is subsonic. High explosives detonate, the reaction moving through the material faster than the speed of sound, creating a supersonic pressure wave. The higher energy detonation of HE propellants are not safe inside the confined space of a submarine, so the slower burn (deflagration) of Black Powder is used to kick the projectile clear of the canned humans, where the more powerful propellant can be safely ignited. But, I believe pressurized air is for submarine launches these days.
Bro ive been dreaming about a chanell that explains the most popular weapons but for casuals like myself that dont know a thing about war and weapons. The videos dont need to be that ling . A 10 min video when 80% of viewers have watched it till the end is better than 60 % of viewers got bored and gave up after 20 min. Please you cant mess it up
when it glides ,it will not make the sound of a ww2 falling shells and boms ,the shqpe was making a shape around the ahell ,that made that sound ,this required a change of external shape ,to make it more like a swan mouth,but the lowed is the important ,because the surface area will be wider but sharp also to maintaine the firat property of flowing through not to resist it .
In Material Science this phenomena is called Metal Fatigue and esp with Aluminium Alloys this will be more so as compared with Steel. Metal Fatigue is a sudden degradation that happens due to shear forces or stress/ strain. It's good that the HAL.undertands this but, then there are ways to gauge this failure or impending failure and there are actually parameters that are set and must be implemented in terms of how.many hours they have been used before they are changed. HAL must do better in terms of doing preemptive maintenance.
Heh, using the name Joint Strike Fighter i.e. F-35, shows the age of this video. Not that it changes anything about the decent little history lesson that the video actually is. Still an amusing thing to notice near the end though. (Joint Strike Fighter is a little cumbersome as a term, but it still sounds cool)
sub war shooting a torpedo if it misses its target the torpedo will return to the sub t be used again AI technology and recovery the sub can send out a single to retrieve the torpedo
The ballistic missile is an obsolete technology. The Russians have a Ch-101 with a range of 4500 km/5500 km (depending on the source of information). They use ballistic missiles fired from aircraft (Ch-47M2). Even Israel already has more modern weaponry (air lora). The Russians use cheap conversions for classic gravity bombs and make them into precision glide bombs. The difference between American , and Russian bombs of this type , is that the American have a maximum of 2,000 pounds (or about 907 kg), and the Russian , commonly used in combat 3,000 kg. Although there are already produced 5 ton and 9 ton (FAB-5000/FAB-9000). American ones rarely have a cluster load. Russian ones often have a thermobaric load. Another cool technology is long-range drones. The Ukrainian rocket drone , “Hell” with a range of about 700 km, or the Polish Warmate 50 drones, or the Polish Striker-both with a range of 1000 km. Cruise missiles are too expensive and easily detected and shot down. Poland has received approval for the purchase of 821 Jassm-ER missiles from the US. It bought about 300. Even the Poles have cheaper technology. The HITs, FAE, FAX, TEX warheads are TNT weight conversions from times three to even times a dozen. 50 kg times 12 and the effect is the same, and the price is dozens of times lower.
Absolutely creepy, the last thing you hear is a screaming jet incoming, and sherik and bang all rolled into one. If you're the neighbor of course... The intended target just kind of hears a tornado for a split second. Who's the good guys again
@@MalachiWhite-tw7hl homie,the Poles were complete morons Germany just wanted 90% German Danzig back and a small rail corridor Nobody with sense thought Danzig should have ever been cleaved at Versailles Nobody in the UK in power favored the war guarantee except Churchill Without the War guarantee,Poles would have negotiated Meanwhile it took 4 months for the French to lift a finger 6 months for the British Meanwhile the poles lasted all of 66 days Then Churchill who cares so much about Poland, gave the entirety of Poland to Stalin for 50+ years Kind of seems like it wasn't about Poland,but the faygy British empire upset that Germany was ascendent Nevermind Stalin invaded shortly after and was rewarded Despite the evil AF Katyn Massacre Churchill also wanted to use Chemical warfare,which the Germans refused to do Bomber Harris refused,bc he knew Churchill would blame Harris for the war crimes after the war Smart man Also almost all British vets that cared enough to respond,told author Nicolas Pringle ,In his book " unknown warriors" that they regretted fighting for the British empire during WW2 and wouldn't do it again given the choice GFU btw
@@timsytanker homie,the Poles were complete morons Germany just wanted 90% German Danzig back and a small rail corridor Nobody with sense thought Danzig should have ever been cleaved at Versailles Nobody in the UK in power favored the war guarantee except Churchill Without the War guarantee,Poles would have negotiated Meanwhile it took 4 months for the French to lift a finger 6 months for the British Meanwhile the poles lasted all of 66 days Then Churchill who cares so much about Poland, gave the entirety of Poland to Stalin for 50+ years Kind of seems like it wasn't about Poland,but the faygy British empire upset that Germany was ascendent Nevermind Stalin invaded shortly after and was rewarded Despite the evil AF Katyn Massacre Churchill also wanted to use Chemical warfare,which the Germans refused to do Bomber Harris refused,bc he knew Churchill would blame Harris for the war crimes after the war Smart man Also almost all British vets that cared enough to respond,told author Nicolas Pringle ,In his book " unknown warriors" that they regretted fighting for the British empire during WW2 and wouldn't do it again given the choice
@@MalachiWhite-tw7hl funny how Germany was blamed for Katyn,despite FDR knowing quite well the Russians did it Seemingly when commies do things,they cease to be war crimes
I wonder how much the onboard vacuum tube super computer weighed and if they are still using the same hardware. I think they are still paying a million dollars for a 40 year old missile that just goes and blows
Keith Dennison, Chief test pilot at BAE Systems try's to follow a cruise missile.... War Thunder sim pilots.... looking down... hold my beer Keith.. DCS pilots looking down at the War Thunder pilots... Awww that's cute! BAE Systems looking at the DCS pilot , mate we have all your flight data since forever, you obviously didn't read the terms and conditions... ha ha ha ha
Seeing such an experienced pilot who presumably also has more simulator time than most, duck a little as his plane in the simulator goes under the bridge, is so relatable that it is funny.
During that segment I was basically thinking "Yeah, I could do that if it was Ace Combat (or Project Wingman :D)". Then I see him duck a little and I immediately think "And I actually would do that playing Ace Combat".
edit: it is at 48:17 (thanks to goatmeal5241 for pointing out that I hadn't put a timestamp.)
48:17 for anyone looking for it
@@goatmeal5241 Thanks, I should have put that in there to begin with.
I fly FPV quadcopters and I find myself ducking as I fly under a tree branch.
If any of you get a chance to try flying FPV, I suggest you take it. It really provides a sensation of flight much more than a simulator.
Mentioning Ace Combat or PGWM = Red flag🚩
Great. A video about the history of everything instead of the cruise missile.
Exactly and why the British they haven't invented jack shit in 2 centuries
@@Kenneth_James I feel like he gave all the info that was declassified. It's a missile with wings that folded out and looked like a tomahawk. The rocket fuel and explosives were covered and how they got from underwater to cruising speed. V1 and V2 was the inspiration. Werner Von Braun was a genius that was held hostage by Hitler. Werner was the reason we were able to leave the planet. Back then Dayton airbase was area 51 before Roswell.
I'm saying not very much about the actual missile lol
This looks to be quite dated to be fair.
For real!
Oh my gosh!!! I use to watch this show way back in the days, the early 2000s!!! Satellite TV just came out and we had so many channels, History, History international, and the Military Channel. I would watch these 3 channels all the time!!! Watching this is nostalgic!!
P Diddy used to watch this too before J Lo turned him on to the freak offs.
calm down - it was 2006. for reference. Torrents were widely in use. PVR had been in use for 5 years. Satellite TV had been widely available for 16 years.
Exactly. Military channel and history channels were my favorites
Man those times was good!! It’s all I watched!!
Same experience, brother.. good old days of Tv..😢
I used to work for an excavation company. I don't think most people really understand what it takes to get more than a meter (or a few feet) into the ground, let alone 30x further.
The best thing I can say is to look at the wooden pilings that are used on docks. A moderately sized wooden pile is roughly the diameter of a Tomahawk missile and will have a tapered end as well. Now watch a pile driver in action. Look how much work it takes to move it down just a small amount. Obviously this isn't a 1:1 comparison, but it will hammer the point home. (and never be sorry for your puns)
That's why bunker busters are narrow, have incredibly thick steel walls and weight 5 tons
Man what a throw back I remember recording this on VHS many years back haha
You still had a VHS in 2006? Okay. We were downloading on torrent by then and PVR was a least 5 years old.
I will show this to my daughter when she's a little older
I was hoping for more of a modern , honest, comparison of our misses vs our enekies
We must be far behind.
Israel iron dome turned out to be not so dome &
Russia has nukes in orbit .
My expectations for an honest, modern, comparison were foolishly high
Thanks
Different to a Tonyhawk which is more skateboard based in terms of speed and travel method
Allegedly it can hit any skatepark. Accurate to within 720 degrees.
This genuinely made me chuckle. Nice one.
Omg finally got to see this again after watching it on Nat Geo Australia.
I really didn’t learn anymore than the layman knowledge I already had bout cruise missiles.
Considering this is a TV show, you should have known that going in. If you want more detailed information, I would advise seeking out declassified technical manuals and training videos or online communities that have experience working in the industry.
My expectations were too high
Excellent video and taught me some historical things. I was involved in development of the AGM-138 JASSM, and it became a very successful program. It flew high because it was stealthy. This conserved fuel (no weaving) for longer range. It used a very accurate INS with GPS update. One bad thing in its development was the program manager. He chose not to utilize LMCO's Design Assurance group, which monitored the electronic and mechanical design techniques used by the engineers. It is essentially a cook book of best practices with two reviews. He thought it would incur additional costs. Boy was he wrong. His engineers, many were young, used whatever they thought was best. The result was so many glitches the prototype couldn't make it out of the lab. He was fired and a more DA friendly manager took over. The result was a stable system with very few glitches. They were quickly ironed out, and it had outstanding performance at the AF's test range (location withheld). Today there are several variants and multiple launch platforms. Ukraine sure could use some.
I was testing a new security system and opted to run a temporary 100' wire thru the kitchen and out a doorway to the outside phone box since that wire was missing. The house was full of IBM engineers (it was a demo house for the new IBM home automation system) and they all criticized me for doing this except for one white beard who cracked up and smacked me on the back for my ingenuity. He had worked on the first trials of the Tomahawk. He told me about how it was a huge challenge to make the missile work for the first time and how they would use duct tape and bailing wire if that's what it took. I had brought him back to those days decades ago.
Nice! thnxfor sharing💪🏼😎
The movie lasts 50 minutes, of which about 10 minutes are dedicated to the cruise missile itself. The rest focuses on the history of aviation, historical cutaways, and introductions to historical figures. Additionally, a few experiments with explosives are presented in a very simplistic manner, almost like for preschoolers. It’s a waste of time with a lot of filler content. There are many amateur channels that thoroughly analyze and explain the construction and functionality of avionics, navigation systems, and target tracking elements.
Thank God I saw this comment had just started watching it a minute ago
It’s about military which is fine by me
The Tomahawks we used in Desert Storm used TERCOM terrain matching navigation, now the Navy uses the Block III which uses military grade GPS antenna that is twice as accurate within 75 feet.
I've learned from working at an aluminum and copper recycling plant that aluminum isn't as flammable as magnesium dust from the aluminum being ground up was. Huge white explosion throwing 2 1500 pound doors 9 feet.
Now the UAVs, starting with Boeing’s predator is an absolute game changer in weaponry.
This was back when documentaries where actually well made, had intersting information, story and big budgets to actually be cool to watch
Man what a throw back I remember recording this on VHS many years back haha...A very well done and informative video! Thank you!
Charles Henderson and Keith Rumbel are truly heroes of rocket technology
A very well done and informative video! Thank you!
the tomahawk sure has one hella fiendish machine spirit inside of it
*Amazing documentary very well done ✅*
BROHMOS Cruse Missile 🎉🎉🎉❤❤
There is the Kalibr
The Tomahawk Cruise Missile represents a significant advancement in missile technology, building on a rich legacy of engineering and scientific innovation that dates back to early rocket development. The evolution of missile technology can be traced through several key milestones, each contributing to the capabilities of modern systems like the Tomahawk. From V-2 Rocket, Redstone and Jupiter missiles, Cruise Missile Technology, Guided Missiles assisted by microcontrollers and sensors, and GPS satellites to stealth technology learned from hard lessons in the battles, everything paved the way to achieve such an incredible engineering feat. The Tomahawk Cruise Missile is a testament to the incredible engineering achievements that have evolved from early rocket technology. Its development reflects decades of innovation and adaptation, drawing on the lessons learned from historical milestones in missile and aerospace engineering.
Amazing documentary to sleep to... Cheers
Tiggtazz clip, hands down, technology a dream come true
Great Video
thoroughly enjoyed this!
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
rofl whats that from I remember that shit
Please do NOT explain how a hammer works.
😵🔫
Good explanation bzw 👍
😊copied from somewhere .. with all my knowledge, i am not sure if this is a joke or real
Is there a stealth cruise missile?
Yes there's several, AGM-129A Advanced Cruise Missile, AGM-158 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM), AGM-158C LRASM (Long Range Anti-Ship Missile)
Yes. I know because I have not seen it.
32:40 Where I can buy that type of Simulator?
Tomahawk has a mercury switch when it comes out from the sub the liquid mercury sucks into the detonator
you don't know what a mercury switch is huh, might want to just plain google it. It's not what you think it is.
yap
Check behind your thermostat. If it is an old one.😊
That's similar to my 60s era home heater thermostat.
Obviously you know nothing
It said can hit its target within 10 meters LMFAO 😂😂😂😂😂😂
DUDE, it was being flown down ventilation shafts back in the Gulf war, today theres a version that deploys swords, FREAKING SWORDS to hit a single person.
WITHIN... he said
@@esecallum what cruise missle has swords attached to it.
@@Iamabot4708 he said within
Sorry, no. Those were laser guided bombs.
@@Iamabot4708The kind that was just used to kill Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri.......Bin Laden's buddy. He was number 2, right below Bin Laden. After the U.S. left Afghanistan, he came back, with the Taliban's permission, went onto his porch to have his morning tea (a guy that I believe said it was coffee) for the 15th straight day at the same exact time he had for the previous 14 days, and "SHSHSHSSHWING!"
His wife and several daughters came out onto the porch to find him chopped to pieces.
Was also used in Iraq against that top Al-Quds forces guy from Iran.
Enjoyed that one.
good one
The missile knows where it is at all times because it knows where it isn't. Therefore it knew exactly where it wasn't.
ohh brother🙄
An excellently composed and generally seemingly really informative video, but a documentary's weakest link is that the moment it is not accurate it loses their integrity. This has a UK voice voice-over but when we get to the V1 it starts to look like another edition of how the Americans won the war. (1) The idea that an American officer 'happened to be in the area' and had V1 material collected and shipped back to the US is totally ludicrous. (2) We (the British) largely through the work of Dr R.V. Jones, then the Chief Scientific Intelligence Officer to the Air Ministry, knew very well what was coming and probably knew the simple mechanism which caused the fuel cut-off and a resultant dive to the ground. And in any case, there is no way that that apparent action by a US Officer, or any other from another country for that matter, would be allowed such action is the stuff of a vivid imagination and if not that then a serious bending of facts. From that point on the credibility of any facts becomes debatable. LATER: No, as far as I am aware the Germans did not 'abandon' the weapon. Our advancing Allied ground forces forced the use of the V1 out of range and, unlike the V2, the launch sites had to be physically constructed. It became an impractical project.
Imagine the poor dude in a small cessna just having a flying lesson who just happens to be in the rockets path at the wrong moment
Bruh did he say "Russian continent"?!🤣30:10
Usa education 🤡
He is talking about the soviet union
It was made of countries
Still right to call a continent
@@Sir_Vantage No, this is just stupid beyond any doubt no matter how you try to justify their geographical error
@@Sir_Vantage Also the USSR is sort of a federation of nations that Soviet Russia re-intergraded after the Russian Civil War but they didn't really have autonomy like the US has.
I had to play it back a few times to be sure of what I was seeing, but at 9:20 the rocket guy has his scale clamped to the table. You would think a rocket scientist (I know, he's a physicist) could think of another way to fix a scale to a table.
Low budget home made. Look at the triangular base. Pretty crude.
Very interesting about the V1 i thought that when they ran out of fuel ⛽ they fell to Earth boy was l wrong. Theez Are good Documentarys. 😊
Right off I see a deep fake, or image manipulation. The image they show at beginning with the giant hole was not of course caused by any cruise missile. That was a famous, or infamous strike on a bunker by an F-117. The allies struck it because it was being used as a planning location by Iraq's military intelligence and Sadam had been there at least once. But what they didn't know was at night it was being used by civilians. Thus when the BIG bomb not cruise missile hit, it killed many civilians. Like I said it was so famous an incident, no way these guys use it by mistake.
dude, this is a shiddy old show from like 1998 lol
Ok, so now you're heading down a learning curve about how videos are made and what the term "stock footage" means.
Is there a point behind it? Because you're not selling me on the "deep fake image manipulation" conspiracy nonsense, it's nothing more than someone who put images together from stock footage who doesn't know the background behind every image of a hole in the ground.
Do you make your barber take your tinfoil hat off every time you get a haircut or do you leave it at home when you go there?
I thought they were shot out of submarine from vertical silos. Never had the idea of shooting like a torpedo!
Secrets sink ships.
That's where the books came from , over there ! 😂😂😂
22:07 I've always wondered what the inspiration was for the jetpack in San Andreas. Looks like this is the boy.
It should start with a german V1 ! Bad intro !
Every time i hear this guys voice it reminds me of the apprentice
there is so much good in this weppons. like flying things to other places very fast.
i wish the world can walk away from wars killings understand we are diffrent from each other and try to have are own way and let others have theres. to say no to wars.
if all of us say no to war then what can anyone do
the onces that suffer? is everyone. there are no winners in war everyone losses
This is an old dokumentation (Weapnology). But a very good one.
the way pilot tilting his head while make a turn in VR
... yep ... he IS focused
5:30 "most rockets are powered by liquid fuel" eh no, no they aren't - not even close. Really big ones are, but a cruise missile isn't big in that context. Even the space shuttle boosters are solid.
Boosters are, but the booster is a part of the rocket, not the entire rocket.
Does anyone know how much silver goes into the production of each one of those?
21:50 Anyone else instantly think GTA 3?😊
Interesting. Wasn't aware of the jet pack-TLAM engine connection
They don't tell, how they make a shell of air, around the rocket. H2O is too dense to launch.
It starts with a shell of air around it from the tube. The denser water will comress the air around it, like a thin candy shell.
44:25 October 2024 Iranian nuclear facility
Why ? Remember this is not a game
Does anyone know when this was originally produced? It seems quite old.
Mid 90s
The missile knows where it is
10:27 👀 Not every rocket NEEDS to be "Tickled"
🫵🤪
Soon in Lebanon?
Ty
sympathy for all the innocent bystanders lost to these death machines
Don't know if it's still true, but the first Harpoons used a black powder booster.
Plenty of modern weapons use black powder in a detonation or launch train.
That's because it explodes instead of burns, and it's cheap but most importantly it's reliable making it ideal for triggering a detonation train or the ignition train of some sort of propellant.
Weren't those used during the American civil war!
@@dukecraig2402 Black powder burns, all chemical explosives burn, they burn rapidly. It is a redox reaction with Potassium Nitrate as oxidizer, sulfur and charcoal as fuels. But black powder is a low explosive, it does not detonate, it deflagrates, meaning the speed of combustion is subsonic. High explosives detonate, the reaction moving through the material faster than the speed of sound, creating a supersonic pressure wave. The higher energy detonation of HE propellants are not safe inside the confined space of a submarine, so the slower burn (deflagration) of Black Powder is used to kick the projectile clear of the canned humans, where the more powerful propellant can be safely ignited. But, I believe pressurized air is for submarine launches these days.
@@jssamp4442 DEAD on sir.
Fascinating
Bro ive been dreaming about a chanell that explains the most popular weapons but for casuals like myself that dont know a thing about war and weapons. The videos dont need to be that ling . A 10 min video when 80% of viewers have watched it till the end is better than 60 % of viewers got bored and gave up after 20 min. Please you cant mess it up
One man's trash might be another man's treasure. 🎉
He sorta understated the danger of concentrated hydrogen peroxide/ T Stof. It’ll melt your actual face off.
How to connect with Sydney Alford please send me details thank you
Go to hell. Or heaven, take your pick. He died in 2021.
They used same thing on twin towers
The pentagon
when it glides ,it will not make the sound of a ww2 falling shells and boms ,the shqpe was making a shape around the ahell ,that made that sound ,this required a change of external shape ,to make it more like a swan mouth,but the lowed is the important ,because the surface area will be wider but sharp also to maintaine the firat property of flowing through not to resist it .
That's got to be some terrifying 💩 to see that fly over your head as a Civilian on the ground
A terrifying........ Chocolate moose!?!?!?!
I bust spontaneously too sometimes 😂
WHOA! Holy Sh!t!😂😂😂❤🎉
Have seen this video originally somewhere else.
I always wondered if you could use the motor to make a flying motorbike 😂
The DART misson from NASA was pretty cool.....
In Material Science this phenomena is called Metal Fatigue and esp with Aluminium Alloys this will be more so as compared with Steel.
Metal Fatigue is a sudden degradation that happens due to shear forces or stress/ strain.
It's good that the HAL.undertands this but, then there are ways to gauge this failure or impending failure and there are actually parameters that are set and must be implemented in terms of how.many hours they have been used before they are changed.
HAL must do better in terms of doing preemptive maintenance.
Oliver BMW !!!😮
Heh, using the name Joint Strike Fighter i.e. F-35, shows the age of this video. Not that it changes anything about the decent little history lesson that the video actually is. Still an amusing thing to notice near the end though.
(Joint Strike Fighter is a little cumbersome as a term, but it still sounds cool)
On Sept. 11 isn't this what they used on the Pentagon?
No, it was a hijacked air plane.
Yes it was
@@jonathanfrank4473 I beg to differ.
@@mhenhawke5093Reality doesn’t care.
It was a cruise missile with passengers
Stop with showing these old weapons. Start showing today's weapons 2024 🇺🇸
It’s hard to make a 50 minute video about weapons that are almost entirely classified.
sub war shooting a torpedo if it misses its target the torpedo will return to the sub t be used again AI technology and recovery the sub can send out a single to retrieve the torpedo
The ballistic missile is an obsolete technology. The Russians have a Ch-101 with a range of 4500 km/5500 km (depending on the source of information). They use ballistic missiles fired from aircraft (Ch-47M2). Even Israel already has more modern weaponry (air lora). The Russians use cheap conversions for classic gravity bombs and make them into precision glide bombs. The difference between American , and Russian bombs of this type , is that the American have a maximum of 2,000 pounds (or about 907 kg), and the Russian , commonly used in combat 3,000 kg. Although there are already produced 5 ton and 9 ton (FAB-5000/FAB-9000). American ones rarely have a cluster load. Russian ones often have a thermobaric load. Another cool technology is long-range drones. The Ukrainian rocket drone , “Hell” with a range of about 700 km, or the Polish Warmate 50 drones, or the Polish Striker-both with a range of 1000 km. Cruise missiles are too expensive and easily detected and shot down.
Poland has received approval for the purchase of 821 Jassm-ER missiles from the US. It bought about 300. Even the Poles have cheaper technology. The HITs, FAE, FAX, TEX warheads are TNT weight conversions from times three to even times a dozen. 50 kg times 12 and the effect is the same, and the price is dozens of times lower.
Absolutely creepy, the last thing you hear is a screaming jet incoming, and sherik and bang all rolled into one. If you're the neighbor of course... The intended target just kind of hears a tornado for a split second. Who's the good guys again
You are the best like his video
Sulfur tends to ad some punch
Matatan
Ribirin H-S.......(".👀.")
39:15 the British bombed civilians in Germany for several months before the Germans retaliated in kind
Poland, Belgium, Holland and France have joined the chat….
Be sure to tell that to the residents of Warsaw.
@@MalachiWhite-tw7hl homie,the Poles were complete morons
Germany just wanted 90% German Danzig back and a small rail corridor
Nobody with sense thought Danzig should have ever been cleaved at Versailles
Nobody in the UK in power favored the war guarantee except Churchill
Without the War guarantee,Poles would have negotiated
Meanwhile it took 4 months for the French to lift a finger
6 months for the British
Meanwhile the poles lasted all of 66 days
Then Churchill who cares so much about Poland, gave the entirety of Poland to Stalin for 50+ years
Kind of seems like it wasn't about Poland,but the faygy British empire upset that Germany was ascendent
Nevermind Stalin invaded shortly after and was rewarded
Despite the evil AF Katyn Massacre
Churchill also wanted to use Chemical warfare,which the Germans refused to do
Bomber Harris refused,bc he knew Churchill would blame Harris for the war crimes after the war
Smart man
Also almost all British vets that cared enough to respond,told author Nicolas Pringle ,In his book " unknown warriors" that they regretted fighting for the British empire during WW2 and wouldn't do it again given the choice
GFU btw
@@timsytanker
homie,the Poles were complete morons
Germany just wanted 90% German Danzig back and a small rail corridor
Nobody with sense thought Danzig should have ever been cleaved at Versailles
Nobody in the UK in power favored the war guarantee except Churchill
Without the War guarantee,Poles would have negotiated
Meanwhile it took 4 months for the French to lift a finger
6 months for the British
Meanwhile the poles lasted all of 66 days
Then Churchill who cares so much about Poland, gave the entirety of Poland to Stalin for 50+ years
Kind of seems like it wasn't about Poland,but the faygy British empire upset that Germany was ascendent
Nevermind Stalin invaded shortly after and was rewarded
Despite the evil AF Katyn Massacre
Churchill also wanted to use Chemical warfare,which the Germans refused to do
Bomber Harris refused,bc he knew Churchill would blame Harris for the war crimes after the war
Smart man
Also almost all British vets that cared enough to respond,told author Nicolas Pringle ,In his book " unknown warriors" that they regretted fighting for the British empire during WW2 and wouldn't do it again given the choice
@@MalachiWhite-tw7hl funny how Germany was blamed for Katyn,despite FDR knowing quite well the Russians did it
Seemingly when commies do things,they cease to be war crimes
Rodoffe &Engkand mean don't care ❤👌👌
Go away from Me 😁👌👌
And My baby's !!! We lette Never know forget all !! Not follow Me !!
Robert !! Doffe Mr.Hans Pony Kichen Crazy!!!
Crazy make only money away 🤣🤣🤣Oil Gruop only luck
Tomahawks are launched by vertical launch tubes.
I wonder what tungsten powder would do😮
The fact he talks about strike distance to the general world population, as opposed to military, is wild.
Theses are made here in AZ at Raytheon
It sounds like Ichigo in his Hollow Form
Al.. Aluminum = thermite..
Is thiis really ww1 tech we are promoting?
did you know that Tom cruise invented the cruise missile
Aluminum powder what? what? Why not stand a bit farther.back on this one what?😮
Such warheads read by india for safety immdt😊
Its so powerful this weapons I like it
Looks like,a drone then a missle
I wonder how much the onboard vacuum tube super computer weighed and if they are still using the same hardware. I think they are still paying a million dollars for a 40 year old missile that just goes and blows
lol @ Keith Rumble, that's a proper name to have
Keith Dennison, Chief test pilot at BAE Systems try's to follow a cruise missile....
War Thunder sim pilots.... looking down... hold my beer Keith..
DCS pilots looking down at the War Thunder pilots... Awww that's cute!
BAE Systems looking at the DCS pilot , mate we have all your flight data since forever, you obviously didn't read the terms and conditions... ha ha ha ha