Woman who fired warning shots to scare intruder says Oakland police treated her like criminal
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ส.ค. 2024
- A woman in Oakland fired her gun into the air to scare off an intruder. She describes herself as a 'mama bear' who was protecting her family. But when police showed up, she says she was treated like a criminal and handcuffed. OPD said firing a gun into the air is illegal.
Subscribe to KTVU's TH-cam channel:
/ @ktvufox2
KTVU delivers the best in-depth reports, interviews and breaking news coverage in the San Francisco Bay Area and California
Watch KTVU's newscasts on www.ktvu.com/live
Download KTVU's news and weather apps for free at www.ktvu.com/m...
Subscribe to KTVU's newsletter at www.ktvu.com/n...
Follow KTVU on Facebook: / ktvu
Follow KTVU on Twitter: / ktvu
Follow KTVU on Instagram: / ktvu2
You know what else is illegal? Breaking into homes and cars. She was standing her ground.
That doesn’t apply for everyone. Florida and Texas explained that to us.
Your suppose to learn gun laws before you buy a gun. Kinda like how you need to learn the rules of the road before buying a car.
@@jeremytaylor4322 Would it have been safer for her to shoot at the intruder and risk the bullet going into someone else's house? Because people get away with that all the time.
@@crisleroi299 more defendable than firing randomly in the air because you can still kill or injure some innocent somewhere else. Bullets can travel up to a mile from the most basic guns and the bullets will come down somewhere. At least if she is firing at the intruders she stands a far better chance of hitting them.
@@crisleroi299 doesn't matter it's about following the law. The law clearly states shoot to kill. Thats why it's very important to take gun classes so something like this doesn't happen to you. Owning a gun is a huge responsibility that most people arnt aware of.
Yes, I learned the hard way too. You don't call the police when something like this happens. The same thing happened to me. An attempted murder, or attempted strong armed robbery almost happened with me. A BMW parked behind me as a woman distracted me while I sat in my vehicle. I was aware of my surroundings and got my gun in ready position. Said man in BMW quickly came up to my window with his hand in his pocket of his hoodie. Looked like he was holding a gun. I beat him to the draw. Got out my car. He stayed there in that position while I held my gun at him telling him to leave. He wouldn't leave. His woman accomplice came at me from the side and snatched my gold chain from my neck and said "shoot him." I'm sure she did not mean me to shoot her bf. I never took my eyes off the perp. They now had my gold chain. I thought I was going to die even though I had the drop on him. I told them to leave. Told them go ahead and keep my chain. Taking a life was not worth more than my chain. The perp would not leave. I told him not to take out his gun. He called my gun fake. He called it a bb gun. He was going to draw on me. I told him it real. Then when I made a choice that he was not going to listen and he was going to draw on me, I decided to shoot a warning shot. The perps finally left. I called the cops. The cops arrested me and took my gun. I had to hire an attorney. They treated me like I was the villain. California sucks. You don't call the cops. That's what I learned. And they wonder why it's getting this way.
Dang Ron dat really is some GTA ish rite there... I'm glad you made it out safe and I you win your case against them. 💯
Damn! Very unfortunate that you had to go through that. Seems like calling the cops does you more harm than good. Glad you still have your life intact though. Wish you nothing but the best homie.
That's cops everywhere you gotta be white or have a blue lives matter flag for them to help
unfortunately a "warning shot" is an unlawful discharge of a firearm and proves to a jury/judge that you were not in fear that the threat was imminent
because if the threat is imminent then you would only have the chance to use lethal force to defend your life
@@CrazyGuyTray the very unfortunate thing here in California is that it's a Democratic state. The state would rather you kill someone rather than fire a warning shot. It really doesn't prove anything about you not being in fear of your life. You'd have to be in the same situation and then tell me if you were in fear of your life or not. Can't say it if you've never been in that predicament. The unjust part about it is that the jury is instructed on how to deliberate. Because any jury would 100% agree that shooting a warning shot has less of a chance of killing someone than actually shooting the person. Trevor Traynor (probably the DA in some county) agrees with prosecuting a victim of a crime, and that's exactly why states like California are sinking down the drain. They give more rights to the perps.
You gotta be your own police, doctor, lawyer, and more in this world. Nobody wants your safety, good health, and freedom more than you.
I Agree With You 💯.
Lady u are 100% in the right well done xx
Living here in Oakland is rough. The police aren’t doing anything. We are out here on our own. Protect you and yours at all cost. Anyone who thinks otherwise should move out here and learn their lesson.
Simple fix don't live in Oakland!
@@Youtubsucks5 you should post your cashapp infor so you can help get the people who have no choice out
I don’t doubt what you’re saying but she shoot into the air a warning shoot at someone who was running away you gotta admit that was reckless as hell then when the police comes she refuses to furnish the gun why even call the police if you were going to be hostile I’m from Detroit so I 10000% get what you’re saying but I mean come on
@@Karazorel.Ms.PG1 what do celebrities have to do with anything? They aren’t community activists and aren’t obligated to be what even qualifies them for such a position and what would they be here for cause mama bear was shooting in the air at someone running away she was in the wrong
What's the lesson? Don't vote for Democrats?
I'm on the ladies side, she can't just let somebody break into her house!
You never shoot in the air smfh
Shoot the attackers then, not in the air where they come back down and hurt someone completely unrelated. I hate that people broke into her home but she's dumb for not using a gun properly
cant shoot guns in the air like a dumbass either :)
@Az Mike Now the would be criminal learned that breaking into home is dangerous and illegal. The mother didn't have time to think things over. This mom did what any other mother would do protect her precious family 👪. Your mother or any mother would of done the same thing. SHE did have a gun permit in the first place.
@@annecinturati2794 as a mother i wouldve never left the safety of my home... Or left the building unoccupied with defenseless children inside. I also would have shot them gad they come inside. What she did was reckless & she truly thought she was doing something cool in front of that camera.
It doesn't work like that Monique... Any time a fired weapon is involved in an incident, the Police have to collect it for evidence. SMH 🤦🏾♂️
The law is correct. Shooting a firearm in a populated area is dangerous. Not to say the woman has no right to defend herself and family.
It's too dangerous here in the Bay to rely on 20 minute police response times. I applaud this lady for defending her home and children.
Shooting into the air isn’t defending anyone lol
Yea putting other people's lives at risk, get real liberal, she clearly shouldn't even be allowed to posses a firearm
@@skylerjacobs7422 Stop embarrassing yourself "Skylur"..
@@69bucksfan Are you saying it's smart to shoot into the air? Do you even know anything about guns?
@@69bucksfan shes absolutely right. that lady should not own any weapon unless she knows how to properly use one
“They were inside for hours looking for weapons.” Instead of being outside looking for the criminals that broke inside her home.
Because she broke the law to idiot. Then hid the gun cause she knew she screwed up dummy. Don't look past that now but you will cause all you see is her color. She couldn't have done anything wrong right.
When you can't catch real criminals pick a poor person and beef up your numbers
She and the criminals should be arrested. She became one of the criminal the minute she fired that gun in the air.
when u live in a residential area with a family home every 20 feet u cannot fire shots into the air, they come back down eventually. pretty simple
Cops don't like armed civilians 💯
Firing a gun in the air in a residential area actually made her a criminal
True. And the assailants should be held liable for that.
Why would she shoot into the ground@@IdahoSewing
so what its better her wakeing up maybe heaven forbid one off her kids badly harmd............. i know whos side iam on
This should be a Teaching and Learning experience for Everyone involved. Thank God nobody was injured or killed.
No one was hurt or killed because the owner scared them off.
"The right to bear arms" this is the very essence of America one could never put their safety in others hands especially with it comes to your home and family
It’s not common but you can accidentally kill someone shooting in the air like that
@@chrislopez6449 yeah this bitch needs weapons and safety training lol
if the aggressor gets away, what guarantee do you have they won't come back armed and intending to kill, not just intimidate. She should have used her second amendment right to actually protect her family and "solve" the problem for good.
She has the right to bear arms but she was treated criminal because she had no right to discharge her weapon if she didn't hit or eliminate her desired target but instead discharged reckless warning shots into the air thats the dumbest and quickest way to lose your gun rights
@@lilpenguin092 she can’t use the weapon to protect property outside, in the person was inside the home protection of life might be justified
Beautiful, smart 2nd amendment supporter right here and we will stand with her side by side any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
You must not be trained in gun safety
Smart? Nah it wasn’t smart or even legal to recklessly discharge a firearm into the air in a neighborhood. What comes up must come down.
@@Vet0714 she protected her family no one cares BYE!!
@@friendlyfire2374 hey genius, clearly people do care. she protected her family by putting other families in danger by being a reckless fool. She lives in a city not a rural farmhouse. She broke the law, end of story. BYE🤪
@@friendlyfire2374 to kill someone who did nothing isn't okay
A firearm should not be used to fire warning shots and instead should be used for its purpose "deadly force" should you feel your life is in immediate danger.
It’s ILLEGAL to FIRE your weapon in the AIR. The police were mad? Go figure.
As a gun owner you never discharge your weapon into the air you can kill someone. You tell them you have a gun and you will shoot them if they don’t leave. But the treatment she got from the police was also criminal. You don’t treat a victim like a criminal regardless.
@@oholm09 Are you high🤨 Wrong story my guy.
She became a criminal for being so reckless and “badass”. Don’t give this lady a pass. F**ck no. You want to own a gun, you better be extra responsible and know what’s safe and legal. Her guns need to be taken from her.
Lol
@@armadasinterceptor2955 why you asked me like that im high why
@@idliketosay yeah and all those criminals pass those backgrounds check ups 😂
The time the police spent questioning her and her actions, could've been spent looking for the criminal that will likely be breaking into other peoples shit on the next block
This is the obvious truth. It’s Infuriating how police act sometimes
The issue is FIRING INTO THE AIR... that is a no no... those bullets will come down and can kill someone
Problem is her action / response is border line criminal... You don't shoot unless you believe you (or family) are going to die or suffer great bodily harm. A warning shot means you were not scared of death/great bodily harm in the eyes of the law/judge/prosecutor etc. Cops don't give warning shots, cops are trained to eliminate/kill the threat - If a Cop shoots, Cop would claim he was scared of death, cop shoots and kills = open and shut case. She would NOT be in trouble if she had shot the intruder... she shot in the air which opens her up to all sorts of criminal charges... she better hope they don't charge her with anything. She went out and got herself a gun without understanding the rules of engagement... Just pointing a gun at someone under the wrong circumstances IS aggravated assault... I doubt she even knows that.
They don’t want to. They lazy
That's why she should've done her job. What's the point firing in the air?
Shooting a gun into the air is reckless behavior. Those bullets will come down somewhere. If she wants to shoot, fire into the ground.
As vastly pro 2-A as I am, What she did was not only Illegal but foolish, reckless, she should have been arrested. PLUS the intruder was leaving her property. WALKING AWAY from her
She has all the right to see for her own. These kind of situations have escalated beyond government's control.
No, firing into the air like that is and should be illegal. The bullet will come back down, and it won't be any slower when it does. People shooting into the air leads to individuals dying every year from the bullet just landing on them on the way down. Her unwillingness to shoot at the person who was actually at fault could get a random innocent person killed just walking down the street blocks away and if not for this video and police report nobody would have a clue how that person died from a gunshot to the head.
@@he-mememan359 so what should she have done nothing 💀? Mabey if you were in the same position you wouldn't say all this 🤔
@@cgforbes9100 She should have shot the person who was making her feel threatened for her life, not leaving the bullets to land on whatever or whomever it may. You know kids die from errant shots like this if they're out hanging with their friends or family, playing basketball outside their house or apartment, whatever, if that bullet happens to land there. It's Russian Roulette where the person who pulled the trigger isn't the one at risk of getting shot and the person who may be at risk has no idea. It lands somewhere else a few minutes later, they have no idea it is coming if they are under it. Maybe if you thought about the possibility of someone you know being on the receiving end of the consequences of her not wanting to the life of the criminal at risk, you'd see why if you are going to pull the trigger it should be at something specific. She's in a residential area.
@@he-mememan359 that random ass scenario is irrelevant when your home is compromised be realistic bro
@@MantimeHustle It is a scenario that plays out regularly, and again, she should have shot at the person who she felt threatened by.
She did more to protect herself and her family than the police.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Unbelievable she gets harassed instead of the police looking for the real criminal s. Criminal s have more rights then someone who protects themselves.
@@cosmokwong1262 u not making no sense at all whatsoever ????????
are you okay ??????
What were they supposed to do to help her?
If one of those bullets struck and killed your kid, would you change your view point? It was reckless for her to shoot in the air. Bullets don't just disappear. They come down somewhere. This is why it's illegal for celebratory celebrations of fire arms on New Year's.
She wasn’t defending herself. She was trying to scare someone after they already left her home. When you shoot a gun in the air the bullets have to come back down somewhere and someone could be injured or killed. If that happened while defending herself that would be unfortunate and a tragedy. But if it happened while trying to scare someone that would be an unnecessary tragedy. She needs to learn a legal lesson about when it is and is not appropriate to fire a gun for defensive purposes.
I hope she has learned this lesson without hurting anyone.
This woman handled this situation all wrong...she should have shot the intruder...and firing a gun into the air could kill someone
I was told about a case where a man broke into someone's home, and cut himself on the glass, sued the homeowners and won the case, where is the justice for the citizens who mind their own..sad times we live in.. evil trumps over good..
Yea I heard about that too that was stupid as hell
The person was inside someone's home. The homeowner didn't break the glass. The intruder or burglar broke the glass. If the homeowner had an attorney they should have won the case.
Cases are won like this because people don't have attorneys, or they don't get good ones. There are companies out there, like US Lawshield, who offer insurance policies for less than $11/mo that would guarantee you had a great lawyer for anything that involves self defense. I've had a policy with them for years now and it's worth every penny. I can even call my local self defense attorney any time I want and pick his brain about laws and to do/not to do that would help with my defense.
That was an absolutely ridiculous case loll. However what this lady did put other people's lives at risk. Only shoot if someone enters your home
@@ziggy5385 If it wasn’t for her they were going to in, she has 5 kids to protect, nobody is going to think “I’m going to wait till a stranger comes in THEN I can use my gun” Stop being ignorant and put yourself in her shoes, you say that because you have all the time in the world to make your comment while she was in that moment, it was either her and her 5 kids or them.
She was right to protect her home and family. She just needs some firearms training to be able to navigate these strict California gun laws.
Protect your family. Protect your home. Protect yourselves.
The issue has nothing to do with strict California gun laws it has to do with basic gun proficiency.
Don't fire a weapon into the air, especially in a densely populated area, that bullet is coming down somewhere. She's going to kill someone that had nothing to do with anything while she's trying not to shoot the person breaking into her house.
Should of shot the intruder. This be a whole different scenario and she be free.
@@LosDjango007 not in California. Maybe if she let them break in…
@@Tom-kn6sr cool.
Then she hides the gun sounds like a criminal. but she got the cell phone back she may have died without it.
You better learn gun safety Woman. A bullet coming back down can go through a roof but there are more yards then roofs.
She broke the law. Period.
While it is illegal and very dangerous (a falling bullet could kill someone)
You gotta respect this woman for defending her family. I hope they drop the charges.
(Warning, enter replies at own risk)
While I feel she was defending her home. I'm against how she was handled, but police was right shouldn't shoot into air, what she could of done is shoot into the ground the dirt same affect.
False actually when u shoot a bullet in the air it goes all the way up till it slows all the way down and you cant be killed by a falling bullet but can be hurts fr
@@marcuzortiz6592 people are killed by falling bullets fired into the air all the time 🤦♂️
Marcus while ur correct bullet slos down but if u know what goes up must come down and as it comes down it actually travel faster than it's going up because gra ity takes over and pulls it back toward the earth and u definitely would die if hit in the head u may live if hit in the shoulder
@@marcuzortiz6592 if its directly up yes but if its in an angle no someone can legit die.
Man this woman was just trying to protect what she loves for her to be treated that way is just plain sad and disgusting.
It has nothing to do with that part. It's firing 3 rounds into the air that's stupid as hell. Bullets come back down.
Very brave woman, why can't the justice system understand her fear for her young children. What if the mother would of waited for the intruder to enter home? I really don't believe this man hadn't good intentions to begin with. Brave mama, God Bless 🙏 you and your precious family. In your shoes, I only hope to be as brave as you. Peace
@@byrontownsel7274 Correct, except mother didn't have many choice with no man in the house. Stop splitting hairs and place yourself directly in this frightened woman's shoes. As a parent nothing is as valuable as your own flesh and blood. If you had children and family to protect like this poor woman, you would make the same decision. We are all living through violent times where criminal activity is as highest as it ever was. Many innocent victims suffer violent crimes and the criminal if arrested is treated with kid gloves. So what happened to rights in keeping family and self alive and safe. We also have human rights.
@@annecinturati2794 They are not splitting hairs. It is illegal and dangerous to shoot warning shots. No matter what Biden tells you. If you have the ability to shoot a warning shot, you are not, by definition, in direct threat of great bodily harm or death and therefore can't use deadly force. ie. shooting any firearm in any direction. White, black, purple, that is how it works for everyone. That is the legal standard so of course when someone shoots warning shots, they will be treated like a criminal because by law they are, at that point, a criminal.
If you can't manage to understand this, then I hope you don't own a firearm and you shouldn't be commenting on this video.
@@byrontownsel7274 yes but consider the stress she was under. I could never do that to her. I would let her off with a warning. Shame on the police. Disgusting robots.
So randomly firing a gun into the darkness is more safe. I don't think so.
Breaking into someone's home is a crime also. She was protecting her family. Kudos to her.
She committed a crime .. and if that bullet that will come down eventually kills someone what about that family .?? For all we know that bullet may kill one of those beautiful children she spoke about .
Protecting her home ? Isn't discharging firearm in the air
@@cesarramirez2935 my ass
@@cesarramirez2935 and what if the perpetrators assaulted or killed one of her children? Would you still say what she did was wrong? Think before you speak bud
iMonke
Wouldn't even be in that much trouble had you just hit the thief.
Maybe not criminal, but possibly civil
@@kevinh2855 when shooting at a target breaking into your home put them down completly. A dead person has no story so its your word against a dead man. Just say self defense and theres no one who can argue it if its on your property. Leaving them alive. Thats where you get counter suits and civil suits. Just gotta make sure you put down whatever threat is in your house and not shoot them in the back and your all good on self defense
She lives in Cummifornia you can't do that
@@jamesspeed2137anyone can do it. Its the singular most common way to get a gun in the united states. Buy in one state. Dont register it and voila you now own a gun. Unregistered weapons make up more weapons than registered in america
@@blackcow1111 You cant know where you sent the person. Couldn't kill him while he's running away cause she's not a cop. She has tremendous respect for human life. She did everything right.
She's got my support. The cops went after her but not the intruder! Figures...
Right they would be out in few hours.
they wanted a easy arrest.
She used firearm recklessly and indagered others by shooting in air! Warning shots are not warning shots they are a deadly use if force, she was no longer in danger and should not have fired in to the air!
@@AKULA689 Interesting perspective. I didn't realize a bird had died when she fired.
@@icemancometh1621 You don't know much about gun safety or gun laws do you? here are some channels for you to watch ((AA)Armed attorney's) ((ASP)Active self protection) (Hardtohurt)! Watch several of each, YOUR perspective will be interesting!
Never EVER fire "Warning shots". It can land you in trouble. It will be looked at as "Intimidating with a deadly weapon" "Unlawful negligent use of a firearm." If you're pulling a gun to fire warning shots, it pretty much says you were not in immediate fear for your life, or else you would not have fired "warning shots". So, don't pull that gun out unless you mean to use it against a threat. If she would have shot the intruder, she likely would not have ended up in trouble.
I have sympathy for the homeowner but to be factual it's extremely dangerous to do that. You may shoot the intruder but to shoot into the air is not sensible.
Where are you sanctimonious hypocrites on the 4th of July or New Years? Oh right outside shooting your guns into the air!!! I'm calling bullshit on your "responsible gun owner" B.S.! Y'all only standing on your "responsible gun owner" mantra because you know gun laws and gun ownership are under heavy scrutiny by lawmakers/breakers.
Bruh even if she shot the intruder, she still would’ve been arrested. Screw California and its dumbass laws, she deserves much better than what she got from the OPD
Breaking and Entering is illegal Too. God Bless this woman too. What a world we are living in now.
Where is that Kenosha Wisconsin kid with his M16 when you need him? Presumptuous woman of color taking things unlawfully into her own hand, on her own property, and endangering the public! Somebody could have died illegally.
She did the right thing. Those degenerates won't be returning I guarantee.
@@anamariacoyote4815 they will come back in a group of 3 she better get a semi auto rifle and ignore the magazine round limits because they carry 30 rounders and arent afraid of silly gun laws,.
Our laws are backward , things need to change for sure .
@@anamariacoyote4815 you’re obviously not a gun owner. What goes up must come down!!!
Anyone that has trained or researched local laws knows this was an idiotic and reckless stunt. Only use lethal force if you fear for your life, only shoot the person making you fear for your life, and definitely do not pursue. (In Ca)
In court they see that and say “did you really fear for your life when you were running out of your door shooting in the air?” Then she didn’t give up the gun to authorities making them get a search warrant. She is a moron.
I don't blame her at all whatsoever, however her mistake was shooting in the air instead of in the grass because what goes up must come down (and that bullet could kill and innocent bystander walking by, thankfully it did not). Having said that, it doesn't justify her treatment by police, she and her family were still victims of a home invasion. Smh
Bullets ricochet
@@remusorchora2827 in grass and dirt they dont
The police should have been harder on her. Bisshhh pullled out the race card 😂😂😂. Tf?? 😂
@@idliketosay should have been harder on her? For utilizing her 2nd amendment right? Did you say the same thing about Kyle Rottenhouse? The cops should have been harder on him? Yeah, didn’t think so. How she was treated was based on her race. If you think otherwise, then it’s probably because you are racist.
@@LuckyLu602 shooting up recklessly into the air to “scare” or “warn” someone is NOT exercising your 2nd amendment rights. Do you even pay attention to details? Geesh some people are THHIIICCCCKK (not in the sexy way either) 😂
To the Oakland Police Officers: You had the description of the true suspect but you treated an innocent woman as though she was the suspect when all she was doing was protecting her home. In fact, you should all give up being police officers if you are only going to treat victims as suspects.
you are rght. these police officrs don't deserve that uniform and they should become drag queens and go to castro street in SF.
The suspect didnt have a gun so he wasn't a "threat" to police so why chase him the armed black woman defending her home(refusing to give you her gun) is the threat. If no one but police have guns they wont feel threatened anymore. Job security if you CAN'T defend yourself and must rely on them for help.
She recklessly discharged a Firearm.
That's criminal.
@@ZeaicliesBut breaking and entering into the woman’s home, grabbing her keys to steal her car isn’t criminal? Make that make sense
@@n8saleen740
I never said anything about the Suspects criminal acts, but thanks for listing them.
Two wrongs are still just wrong.
Never Fire warning Shots.
Fire to Kill and Never to injure.
Sound Familiar?
When you lose the ability to feel safe, you need to flee. I bet that boys Mom was happy her son made it home that night. I hope he makes better decisions. I hope for peace and safety for her and her family.
Irresponsible firearm owner, teach her what to do and when. But don't take her defense away. The handcuffing of unaggressive people in the presence of MULTIPLE officers needs to be reevaluated
She's not irresponsible she was defending her property, seems like the person committing the crime has more rights.
She was wrong for firing into the air. That’s improper gun handling but this is a lesson she can learn.
@@polofunk Yes, she was. Where do you think those bullets are going to go? Anyone that can breathe unassisted can see this.
She should already know what the fuck to know, any reasonable person with godamn common sense would get the proper training and learn the fucking law before even buying a gun.This isn’t the Wild West, I get defending your property but I’ve seen countless other examples of this happening and the homeowners were able to communicate they were armed and ready and the robber either took off or got shot. She either should’ve shot the definitively at him or not shot at all, no godamn in between.
@@SkinniJ
Fuckin A.
One thing though....I hope the thief doesn't escalate the violence of their actions. If it does i hope it's met with appropriate consequences. 😉
We need more officers like her.
like her how shooting a gun recklessly in the air
its called gun safety and she did not have any
@@rayzimmermin not to be confused with home security or self defense. So your the safety guy. Lets check in with you next time i top out at 230 mph so you can talk about recklessness.
@@rayzimmermin ive seen maltese puppy acting more recklessly then her.
@@rs3maniac178 so your comparing a black woman to a baby animal that's kind of racist isn't it
im not sure about you but i expect all humans to have a functioning cerebral cortex and be capable of higher level thinking then an animal
@@rs3maniac178 if you are driving at 230mph you are committing not just one crime but a shit load of crimes and risking other peoples lives you should be hung up by your balls unless you are driving the autobahn
and admitting to your own criminal activity's dose not excuse her of her criminal activity's it just means you should both be in jail
As a 2nd amendment supporter and gun owner, never fire warning shots and NEVER shoot randomly in the air. You could kill someone doing that. What comes up comes back down. If you decide to shoot at someone shoot to KILL. If you aren’t willing to kill someone to protect yourself then you shouldn’t be discharging your firearm. Falling bullets from firearms discharged into the air have killed before and they will likely kill again. Don’t be reckless, if you get a gun go take classes so you know how to properly use it. Stay safe out there!
Sorry lady you don’t get to play the victim here. Use your firearm in self defense or don’t. 1) Firing into the air endangers innocent people. 2) Refusing to handover a weapon used in a crime to the police just might get you handcuffed. You can tell by her body language, she knows she’s in the wrong too.
I'm glad she was able to protect her self and property.
@@Amaru722 funny how people cant grasp that concept lol
@@Amaru722 get robbed and possibly killed by an intruder, that intruder does not care about you. Before the criminal gets caught, he will kill you to not go to jail.
Have anyone of you been a victim of crimes????
@@reallifemoments. bruh no one is saying she cant defend her home I respect her for that n she has every right too, but not when the suspect is running away w his back turned and her shooting shots in the air. THATS ALL WERE SAYING
@@reallifemoments. put your self in that situation what if those bullets came down n hit one of your kids, then would u still b claiming what u claim , hell no . And if u say other wise, we see your stand in your mindset lol
The same thing happened to my dad. He saved our lives and got jail time. Dude shot the front door knob down with a tec 9, my dad was waiting on the first set of stairs inside and caught him in the leg, but he shot at him when he ran out the house. So they arrested my dad and tried to give him like 10 years, he was completely legal. I understand. A stray bullet is dangerous but damn. Even the detectives that arrested him were like we think you're a hero, but we have to do this
That's why you're only in the right if an intruder crosses your threshold. Shooting thru an entrance/exit door is extremely dangerous not to mention illegal. Hope your dad learned his lesson
@@ziggy5385 man shut up!
Too tragic what happened to your dad. Nowadays it looks like only criminals have the right of way and when arrested nothing happens to them. Only when you are trying to protect yourself and family, you run into trouble with law enforcement and the courts. What happened self defence ????? Too much Liberalism, Progressives running wild catering to criminals. Court Judges aren't any better, only wait if they became victims of crimes themselves. We need changes in the law system and show criminals ' you break the law, you pay the price '.
@@ziggy5385 you earned this 🫴 L
@@annecinturati2794 I think a huge part of the problem is the right wing billionaires that own private prisons that sue the federal government if they don't keep their prisons full, so police go out their way to deliberately arrest as many people as possible
She guilty she wrong! Never fire warning shots. That was dangerous and wrong! She can complain all she wants she was WRONG. Untrained people do untrained things.
I stand with her✊🏾
❤
The damn police force sure has a lot of time and personnel to harass a person at her own home. They must be pretty proud to finally carch a “criminal” with a gun.
She committed a crime
@@BP-vr3rt so the crime being done against her is no big deal but her protecting herself is a crime?
@@westcoast9285 IF you are going to pull a gun to protect yourself, your family and your property make sure that the threat to those things are what you are aiming at. If you are unwilling to do that then don’t pull it in the first place. Firing in the air is absolutely foolish and very dangerous. If you don’t have the common sense to know that, then you shouldn’t have a gun in the first place. 2nd Amendment right or not.
@@HelloMoto1991 I do agree with you on that. We have a right to defend ourselves but that doesn't give us the right to shoot without any caution to those around us. Gun discipline.
All she had to do was cooperate. Hand over the firearm for investigation and they could have pursued the home invasion investigation.
What a shame how they did her. This country's going to hell
She illegally disharged a firearm in the air, not caring where the bullets would hit, small child? School? Who knows. And then when you discharge a firearm you have to give the police your firearm for evidence which she agreed to when purchasing a firearm. She refused. Which is illegal.
@@shaneintegra They were breaking into her house.. loo
@@harrysacket doesnt matter. You can clearly see in the video the person was trying to leave. So she fired the gun in the air so the bullet could hit her neighbors house or somewhere else... thats against the law because some people dont want to die.
@@harrysacket only time you should discharge a firearm is if its a kill or be killed moment. Not to scare someone who is walking away or isnt trying to hurt you.
@@harrysacket doesn’t matter. Shoot the thief, not the air.
I'm with the law. Firing rounds into the air is extremely dangerous
So she sent bullets into the air with no idea what poor bastard they would hit when they came down a mile away? WICKED SMAHT! If you discharge a firearm, discharge it DIRECTLY AT the imminent threat of death or great bodily harm. If there isn't an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm, then it's not the appropriate time to shoot. Warning shots are stupid.
Never discharge your weapon in the air, the rounds come down somewhere. As stated, it's illegal and reckless.
not according to the president of the United States who suggested you fire two warning shots into the air if your home is being broken into.
I do agree as in third world countries even the police shoot into the air always giving warning shots it is illegal
Shoot into the ground next time let her off.
But shooting the burglar dead would be legal.
The law is an ass.
@@raypurchase801 no. bullets come back down. and hits innocent people you pleb.
Before turning over a firearm after such an event, I would gladly go into police custody and then I would demand a warrant.
Anyone who fires a gun in an incident like this should absolutely turn it over to responding officers asap
Why not hand it over for inspection and ballistics?
Actually if you did what she did in California a warrant may be the least of your worries.
Bf in the military. You NEVER fire a gun into the air! And the reason warning shots aka unlawful discharge of firearm are illegal is because if you pull your gun out, that means you have to reasonably be in fear for your life and willing to use deadly force. Her shooting in the air was both dangerous and shows that she was not in fear of her life enough to use it on the intruders. She would have been better off firing at the grass and claiming she missed.
Well, you see what happened was..."POW POW POW"!!!
Umm that action was very illegal.
I was being harassed by a bunch of dudes in Oakland long ago. Cop showed up and told me to leave while the aggressive party was telling the cop to eff off. I asked the cop if he could at least escort me back home and he said no and hauled ass. Cops are people to, not all of them are brave.
He was giving you the greenlight man smh. Come back and shoot them up, they wont investigate. You missed your chance.
sounds like you were instigating if you needed an escort home. you should have just leaved instead of playing the victim.
Even if arrrsted your boyfriend leftist DA let’s them out in one second. Wtf they supposed to do and these scumbags wtf u expect from these street people
@bahai They second guess because if they do something to the wrong color or wrong person and that person goes and sues, they could potentially have their life ruined for doing their job.
@@Seedistrash Those folks don't give a dn about that because of they did they wouldn't keep doing stupid shxt that puts them in those situations..
There was a young woman in San Leandro who was killed by a falling random bullet. I understand she was acting by mama bear instinct, but I hope she'll do it differently if she should have the need. Thank goodness everyone is ok!
hahaha! The police wanted the gun because she shot bullets in the air. People die from stray bullets all the time.
Shocker. She would not comply with the police and show them the gun.
Shocker she's black so it will be about race and Im sure the city will have to write her a victims check of 100k for her Trauma.
@@ashinstinct354 you seem upset
@@TeaWithYee yea, bad day.
@@ashinstinct354 bullets lose momentum when, I never heard of someone dying from a stray that was shot in the sky
It's rlly stupid for ppl to do tht. Jst makes guns seem all the more dangerous and not worth being in the hands of civilians. Any minute, a mad person could fire and end someone's life. How is that okay & tolerated....?
Where did the bullets come down....she was treated like a criminal because the action was reckless.
It's illegal to shoot your gun in the air. Simple as that.
I support you sister And I’m happy that you and your family are safe.
Sister or queenz?
I need a fire going somewhere shoot somewhere where you know where the bullet is going. That bullet if you were within a quarter or half mile of that house where she shot it could come down and kill you or One of yours. Great she was able to defend her self but you Gotta do it without killing innocent by standards a half a fucking mile away. Learn about guns before you go out there just blast away its ignorant
As much as she did the right thing she also did something that she wasn't suppose to as well.
Bullets do tend to come back down and if that stray bullet happen to hit someone innocent I'm sure that persons family will be devastated as well.
She could've shot towards the intruder instead, perhaps even towards the ground near them.
She is called Mahogany and you are Carmel.
That is Fing hilarious.
@@PrincessofKeys it's better if she just shot the ground shooting the intruder fleeing is not a sign of threat and she'd charged for that. The only time it's okay to shoot someone is if they actually break into your home
Never ever fire warning shots. Good lord, why would she think that was a good idea. Shoot the robber. Yes she could of killed someone else with those warning shots. But what if the robber had a weapon and decided to use it on her? Now she has two less rounds to defend herself with
three
It's like she ignored all the basics of gun safety. She's responsible for every bullet that leaves the barrel of her gun.
ya she shouldn’t have done that
How you gone kill someone firing into the air so people live in the sky now she in a neighborhood in front of her house not by no buildings so who she gone hurt them people should have never broke into her house simple as that police need to stop looking to charge her with anything
Sadly, she will lose and five kids? No daddy? Bad bad bad. Stay inside your home and shoot the intruder. Makes a mess to clean up but you can't leave your home, not in this state, and chase after someone and claim you're defending your home anymore.
The Police go after her and let the intruder go free. Typical for this clown world we live in now. Why am I not surprised
Oakland lets all sorts of nonsense slide. I just don't see it being a productive use of their time chasing down a homeowner who recklessly discharged their firearm in the air while protecting themselves from a burglar. Maybe in another city, but not in Oakland. Oakland is quite the dysfunctional city, and their police force is seemingly on the brink of collapse. If you can even connect, you'd be lucky to get a 911 operator in less than 10 minutes. Dispatch is buying used equipment on Ebay, and the Crown Victoria was discontinued 12 years ago. I don't even think the ones in this video are 2011 models either😆 Does anyone remember seeing 80's police cars still being used in 2003? I don't.
If they think social workers are a good idea for domestic violence situations, then a gun re-education class for legal owners in a situation like this isn't too far fetched. Maybe make a local gun range conduct the classes. A win for everyone.
Her first mistake was telling the person in the house to " CALL Da POLICE" she see how that worked out for her.. Smfh
You don't think someone else would have called them when they heard an idiot firing shots?
@@TheRandompaint no
@@TheRandompaint
No
@@TheRandompaint Maybe but if they didnt see her shooting, cops got nothing.
Shes in the wrong. Cant just shoot randomly in the air. Either take out your target or shoot at a target but never off in the air
Why?
@@humanbean1424 because she WASN'T IN NO REAL DANGER as the person had run off. also don't forget that what goes up must come down
@@humanbean1424 look how close those houses are look at the cars on the street those bullets could have come down and hurt someone who’s to say it would have been the roof if she wasn’t going to shoot at a target she shouldn’t have shot and then to do all that extra after smh no her actions are 100% criminal and reckless what if one of HER kids had run outside and been hit by that falling bullet
Because??
@@m1ferreira465 she wasn't in no real danger? Someone tried to break in her house? What's not dangerous about that...
Don't make that mistake again....
My uncle got shot miles away from where someone fired into the air, he was just walking to the store a bang a bullet fell and hit him. Because guess what?! what goes up must come down. I understand she was in fear but if you are going to keep a fire arm learn how to safely use it and learn the laws where you live. We all have a right to defend our selves but not at the expense of innocent people that are around us. Supposed someone was sitting on their roof just hanging out. It’s their right to do so without fearing a stray bullet is going to hit them from a reckless individual. Use your fire arm responsibly.
If my mother would have done this, I would be grateful beyond measure
What goes up must come down queen just remember that bullet landed somewhere. I advise you to shoot in the ground but all do honesty don't shoot period unless you see your target and you have the intent to kill. Stay safe out there 🙏
For those who want to shoot warning shots , always shoot at the ground, bullets always come down and land
reckless discharge the bullets come back down dummies but if she fired into like the dirt i wouldn't see it being so bad.
She has a right to protect her home, but shoot the thief next time. Hell, shoot the ground near their feet. It’s illegal and highly dangerous to shoot into the air. She’s thinking it’s just going to damage someone’s house. What if it landed on someone outside? They’d be injured/most likely killed because you wanted to shoot into the air. 🤦🏻♀️ common sense.
Really what about celebratory fire. But if I remember right that is somehow legal in the US.
@@mickalinjezerx7104 I don’t know about that. Doesn’t seem like it would be. And it shouldn’t be.
@@mickalinjezerx7104 just looked it up. It is illegal in any state. Some states it’s just a misdemeanor, and in others it’s a felony.
MythBusters debunked the idiotic claim that it's dangerous to shoot in the air, but don't let facts ruin a fantastic sounding lie
@Long Live NRA MythBusters debunked the idiotic claim that it's dangerous to shoot in the air, but don't let facts ruin a fantastic sounding lie
The police treated me like this when someone kicked my door I when I lived in an apartment. And I didn’t even have a firearm then, It’s just ridiculous and a lot of times when you call they get there 8 hours later. That’s why I am now armed.
W T F !!
She is a single female,
Protective, being both momma and poppa to her kids.👈💯
She was merely protecting her cubs.
Firing a few rounds in the air is a lot different than ghosting an individual.💯 👈
What would you do ?!?!
Lol. Obviously you have zero professional training, knowledge, experience, or skills in this area.
I'm all for the using firearms for self-defense, but firing into the air is a horrible idea no matter the situation, just fire into the ground (dirt not concrete or hard objects like rocks, that could end up causing ricochets to occur), just don't fire into the air because what goes up must come down and I doubt anyone wants to be hit with a bullet from the sky.
Some good advice: *don’t call 911 if you’ve got the supplies you need to defend yourself, your family, and your home. they will only make your problems worse* 😁
They would have responded to shots fired regardless. Defend yourself, but don't leave your house and shoot into the air. That's a straight up felony
@@ziggy5385 "defend yourself, but don't defend yourself" is essentially what you just said. Bootlicker.
@@ChiarleAzrial he probably means shoot the person not the air lol
@@ralphire77 the person wasn't in her house yet. Is she supposed to just sit there, and let the stranger walk around her property and not say or do anything till the cops get there? Cops take forever to respond. You don't know what the strangers intentions were, if they were also armed or not. I would NOT want to sit helplessly while some creep wandered around my property, not knowing what their intentions were. That's not defending yourself.
@@ChiarleAzrial you can still scream and point you weapon if you want or shoot at the ground idk but don't shoot up because those bullets have to come down eventually
I called 911 on some guy waving a gun across the street in front of a hospital around a block away from where I live and the police had the AUDACITY to grill me and treated me like I was making it up. How ridiculous. Like sir, you’re just scared and don’t want to do your job
Even though she may have been defending her family what she did was illegal and reckless....obvoiusly by her going outside and firing means the intruders were fleeing and no longer a threat...those bullets could have came down and killed someone then she would be charged with manslaughter....very stupid
The cops treating this as a criminal intent because she fired her weapon outside her house in a community area, bullets travel and fast.
"I discharge my firearm with a warning for this person to leave. They don't do it."
I'm 100% 2A and her right to defend herself and family but warning shots are reckless and put innocent people at risk. By her own words, her warning shots didn't even deter the criminal. That's why finger off the trigger until you are ready to fire and you shoot to end a threat (kill if necessary). Self defense goes beyond scaring criminals with a loud bang, you have to prove you mean business by slinging lead in their direction, not into the air (and potentially on to an innocent). Better a criminal end up in the hospital/jail or dead (since they chose crime) than an innocent who had nothing to do with it get hurt.
Totally agree
That sums it up.
thanks for the input
Someone has a brain and training. I was taught the same. The only difference is they did say warning shots ( not preferred ) go into the ground, not the air. But you should always just end the threat and call it a day
This is what happens when someone listen's to joe biden's advice on firearm use
No, that was RECKLESS!!!!! She should NOT have gone outside and definitely NOT fired into the air!!!!! I know of a child who DIED when someone did that, and across the subdivision, the bullets came down on the church, with one hitting and killing the child. Had she stayed in her home and fired at the woman while the intruder was still in her home or was moving toward re-entering it, Mrs. Gillam would be in the right. Mrs. Gillam was probably not thinking clearly and acted recklessly out fear for her family. We do not think clearly when our children are threatened and in danger. My prayers are for her.
She wasn't thinking clearly then and certainly not now.
The lady wasn't a criminal, the intruder was. I hope the lady sues the police for treating her like a criminal. This is unacceptable behavior of the police.
she did nothing wrong whatsoever, she was protecting her family, the ones she loves the most. Best thing she could've done though was honestly shoot it towards the Dirt, as the bullet falls towards the ground it can be lethal, but that's a small percentage.
You can tell she didn’t want to hurt the intruder but just wanted to scare her off with warning shots that she is armed
But she's going to end up killing someone else. Those bullets have to come back down. It's ILLEGAL. That's why she was treated like a criminal. Pretty simple if you're not a potato.
@@lockheedload what goes up must come down
@Joshua Bailey yup, should have fired into her yard if she wanted to do warning shots. Sorry, I am not worried about injuring or possibly killing an intruder entering my house. They are not worried about injuring or possibly killing you or your family. My warning shots will be center mass.
@@drakes1515 I think at the moment she was not thinking right , just wanted to scare them
@Posse Ruthless yeah I understand what she was trying to do, but as a responsible law abiding gun owner, I know it is illegal and the severity and danger of firing a gun into the air and would never do it. I couldn't stomach injuring or killing an innocent person or child by shooting a gun in the air. I could deal with and move on with life if I injured or killed a criminal threatening my family or my life. It would still be hard though.
"The right to bear arms" does not apply to Black People.
That.. law.. was put in to place to kill us.. not to protect us.. it’s was law for the other color.. to give the right to shoot and kill us.
...and we all know that CA was an open carry state...until the Black Panthers showed up armed!🤣 Then Ronnie Reagan called for a change to state law! Not one of your gun advocate groups said a word! Not one.
It sure doesnt..We have to move totally different than those other folks do...
I really hope that this young lady gets this message. I am a 64 year old white male and I hope she is vendicated. She did NOTHING wrong protecting her family. Maybe she could have fired the shots in the grass, but in the moment, she did what she needed to do. All of our laws need to be reviewed to see if they are applicable to the situation. It is not like she was on a drunkin bender and being wreckless. God Bless you baby girl...
She fired a gun in the air!! That’s illegal dumbass
Stop right there "Maybe she could have fired....". She SHOULD have fired into the ground right there. In that moment she did EXACTLY what she DIDN'T NEED TO DO,
fire wildly in the air. She knew better. If she didn't know better then she shouldn't have a gun. Period
No sir....by her going outside her home and firing means the intruders were fleeing and no longer a threat therefore deadly force can no longer be used....she recklessly fired in the air which could have killed someone...
🐕💚🍕 dogs like pizza 🤠 you are not a white male 🤠 dogs like pizza 🐕💚🍕
Let's stop Sugar Coating the Issue! She might not have harmed anyone...she was just lucky, that no innocent person was harmed. She truly needs to Learn The Laws, and Abide by them. Life is Too Short, to Die Ignorant!
If I was foolish enough to fire warning shots, I'd shoot into the ground.
Amazing how some people are always wise when they have never or aren't in the situation 🙄🙄🙄.
@@msg4141 I think coming out with a gun would be a sufficient deterrent. Why do you need to shoot.
Then you might just kill a roache or night crawlers. 25 to life right there.
@AshGreen you have no idea what are you talking about
@@debrajohnson382 u don't know this 🐀 s . U think 🤔 they scared 😨 of your gun 🤦 . Nowadays they not even scared of the police
I'm all for the 2A and police audits, but warning shots are irresponsible. You're responsible for every bullet that leaves your barrel. What goes up, must come down. They're lucky no one was hurt.
Those warning shots were irresponsible to you but better to shoot at an unknown and direct direction!!!!!!!!
You're right. She should have shot them.
She was trying to spare a life.
She should have shot them. She could have killed someone!🤯
You sound stupid! Did you see anyone else out there who could have gotten hurt? Pre-dawn hours. No one was outside of her house but the intruder and the home owner.....Geeezzzzzz.
What? This is ridiculous!!! She's a responsible gun owner who did the right thing!
Just please people don’t fire warning shots that’s highly improper use of a firearm, if you’re going to shoot it in self defense you need to have purpose behind the shot, meaning you have got to shoot the person assailing you and not at the sky or ground
What goes up must come down. No such thing as a warning shot.
There is a warning shot the security officer allowed to fire one round on the ground responsibly. Can’t say that there’s no such thing as a warning shot.
@@kaceyle4706 You call it a warning shot. The state of CA calls it a crime. She'll probably get 6 mos; probation. The video is evidence against her.
Warning shots should be aimed at the perpetrator then, right? Better to accidentally hit someone you eventually want to shoot than a random.
@@bwj1158 maybe for civilian I don’t know , not quite sure . However , in Florida security officers are now proceed and allowed to fire warning shot on the ground grass. I saw it with my own eyes and I asked the shreiff is he even allow to do that and they said yes because it’s a warning procedure to give the aggressor from bodily injuries or any other potential harm.
@@bwj1158 perhaps my mistake because I didn’t know CA like that . Every state had different rules yep .
Arbury's killers were treated like witnesses and they just murdered a man. But as advice to the woman defending her house, give a verbal warning once and the next warning put it dead center in their chest.
I thought the same
Facts…🧐💯
100000000%
and don't shoot them in the back you will go to jail....
@@tpvaaj6675 There in lies the problem for all gun users in unpredictable situations …but like my man said…”dead center in their chest”😁
Learn the laws before you get a gun
Shooting a gun into the air is NEVER OK. A chip off a roof?? We have a law in Arizona called Jennifer’s law bc a beautiful little girl was killed by someone doing this.
Joe Biden said it's OK to fire your shotgun in the air to scare off the perp. That's what he tells his wife to do. Maybe he should pardon the lady?
What goes up, must come down. Imagine sitting at the dinner table and suddenly catching a bullet, or laying in bed and a random round comes through your ceiling striking you. It can happen.
Oh yeah? just show me ONE time that actually happened with someone dying from it.
They can't there like any news station talk out there ass first look for facts later
@@seguefischlin A Million ways to die. A man was walking with his wife and then a bullet struck his head from above that was fired from a gun a few blocks away from someone's backyard. I remember this story 10 years ago when I was still in high school
@@seguefischlin it’s not common but it has happened sadly, search it up I won’t do it for you.
@@seguefischlin happens in mexico all the time
Bullets don’t just disappear, they can hit civilians when coming back down and if it did kill someone she would be charged with murder
Murder? Lol do you even know the definition of murder? Lol. It’s not just killing someone, my friend. You need intent, where is the intent? If she didn’t even intend to kill the burglar you think she would intend to kill an innocent random person? You’d be losing all your cases as a prosecutor.
So shoot the burglar instead?
ITS CALLED A WARNING SHOT FOR A REASON! She wouldn’t be charged, the lady would. Her invasion caused a death. & it’s not murder it’s accidental manslaughter
@@Princessssssssss930 Warning shots are stupid and reckless, tbf
@@beanguzzlingvillager2180 yaw keep talking about warning shots but probably never lived in an environment or been in this situation. Easy to SAY what you would do
You go mom
I would protect my kids too
I see how it’s dangerous
Well you gotta do what you gotta do to protect your family you don’t know what his intentions were
Shame on the police were not looking for him
Putting the woman trying to protect her family in handcuffs smh
then who is going to protect them while you're in jail?
Have you ever taken a gun safety or hunters safety class? What she did is wrong, dangerous, and stupid!
".... call the Paulese..." as she fires into the air. Why not just shoot it into the ground? Seriously, the noise is the same but the danger to neighbors
far and wide is averted.
That's why you NEVER EVER call the cops for anything, they only make matters worse.
So why do we have them?
@@sonofnok2153 for show an tell ig