PART IV - “Privileges or Immunities” v. “Substantive Due Process” [No. 86 LECTURE]

Professor Christopher Green of the University of Mississippi School of Law compares the Privileges or Immunities Clause to Substantive Due Process. What do these terms mean? How are they used and are they interchangeable? Learn more at fedsoc.org/no86.
#no86 #law #lawpodcast #constitutionallaw #dueprocess #lawstudent #lawstudents #lawschool
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

[@wraithconscience]

One interesting characteristic of Prof. Green's discourse is that he increasingly clarifies and concretizes as he goes along. If you don't understand it at first, you will. Listening to him, we might also hope the Privileges or Immunities clause would take increasing influence -- as it was originally intended to do. The use of the Equal Protection clause, while attractive, actually seems not to provide the studiest basis for key issues in our society, namely protection from violence and freedom from "laws" that destroy our Constitutional rights.

[@2Truth4Liberty]

not taken for granted, rather, haunting since 1873
Good summary of the reality. But to correct course after 150 years???
Serious question - would the analysis for a "privilege or immunity" be much different than the "stand-in" substantive due process analysis?

[@thomaszynda]

I am a victim of a fraudulent Unlawful detainer perpetrated by my landlord who failed to submit rental debt then used as a means to evict me while myself and landlord had been participating with covid-19 rental assistance for 8-months prior to this action. She was also paid for pat of 3-day notice the day after I was physically removed from my home. In a state that has looked the other way on more than 5 million undocumented aliens in our communities. I am politically and financially disenfranchised by the State of California or California however it needs to be conveyed. my property, my job, and my home taken from me without a trial.
regardless the ruling was and is against the law. I direct opposition to the intent of the legislature during a global pandemic to prevent further cases of covid by keeping the public housed.
I was left for dead in the street of the greatest nation this world has ever seen.
this is against the very fabric of this nation.
I can jot get an attorney to help me even at 50 percent of my award.
Fair employment and housing, California civil rights. nor attorney search networks nor private attorneys all denied jurisdiction even in the fact of direct instruction to go to a particular government agency.
the rule of law is broken, and our way of life is slipping dangerously toward the wild, wild west! in that case I got this but until then I keep loading ammo!
I am mad as hell I will get a remedy in one way or the wild west way!

[@thelement3363]

what a joke