Dobbs and the Future of Substantive Due Process

The Federalist Society's Jacksonville Lawyers Chapter Presents: Dobbs and the Future of Substantive Due Process
Featuring:
- Patrick Kilbane, President, Jacksonville Lawyers Chapter
- Catherine Urbanek, Jacksonville Lawyers Chapter
- Prof. Robert Pushaw, James Wilson Endowed Professor of Law, Caruso School of Law, Pepperdine University
- Prof. Danaya C. Wright, Professor of Law, Levin College of Law, University of Florida
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

[@garrettleatham9682]

So many of her arguments were policy arguments, not legal arguments. We can make policy arguments all day long, but none of those argument should have any consequence on constitutional arguments.

[@interwebsinquestclips]

Except throughout the entirety of US constitutional law until like 40 years ago, justices took values and consequence into account in interpreting the constitution

[@VeniVidiVici456]

Substantive Due Process is a fabricated legal ch concept used as a tool by progressive, activist jurists for the purpose of advancing preferred social policy decisions circumventing the legislative process. Leave it progressives to manufacture justifications for ends justifying the means as long as favored outcomes are attained.

[@garrettleatham9682]

@@interwebsinquestclips it's a good thing they stopped. Just because somebody did something prior doesn't mean that it justifies continuing that behavior.

[@mc-g581]

No activism? Please review the actions of the Society and the bias towards Libertarianism, which is a British Empire movement and anti American System of Political Economy.

[@joannthomases9304]

Is legal lawful ? I thought those were 2 separate terms and ideas . Did it give any right to a debtors prision or money having various terminology as in negotiable instruments or sea laws taking over land laws ? Did fetus turn into placenta ? Not really born as in berthed as in shipping terms ...yet written as birth certificates as in registered Under a Corporate entity ? Estate being withheld ? What then is an issue of blood ? Would that really be through many confused terms in various fictional languages on ambiguous contracts on needing 4 or more dictionary + rules + brackets only few comprehend, yet endorse, which might mean sign, autograph or pledge to, as if a Gs7...additionally creating these bonds as in GSA bonds in courts worth millions, while a living man sits behind bars, bar atty., and Bar-Gaining and then to Bar coding carries on , through,untruths, half- truth, naming by trick, saying all this is just fine to do... ? A jail is taking a life away, when comprehending stopping movement in commerce. To "regulate", is not to stop, retard, nor to end. Rights = written or un written ? Spoken or unspoken ? Ill will by staging of lies is what? Provoking, is then another Grand concern.

[@goddess_of_Kratos]

So the human life argument can actually be, in abortion 1 is guaranteed to die, without is less risk of harm. Unless the pro-choice side want to devalue the fetus as less than 1 life. And in that case, get child protection services out of the maternity ward immediately. Because what a mother does while pregnant is to less than 1.

[@desertpunk6705]

She doesn’t make very good arguments. Her arguments are legally weak and just emotional appeals. She doesn’t even try to convince her opposition. She doesn’t know her audience. It’s as if she is only speaking to herself.