[OUTRO CORRECTION] Hey guys Derald here, in the outro I mixed it up. Fuji was more magenta surprisingly. The results from this roll are contrary to the usual green tint of Fuji. Not sure if this is because of the scanning or because the photos were shot indoor. We need to make a follow-up vid on this.
Colour shift is more strong when the image is underexposed. By the lack of detail in the blacks and shadows I think you guys have exposed for the highlights. When I want natural skin tones, I meter for the skin and open 1 stop. Film can handle highs quite well. Btw, nice video!
I'm not sure why you went to the trouble of using the same lens and cameras then used two different scanners. For a controlled experiment I would have thought you would have scanned using the same scanner and software.
QNetX For clarification, all photos shown in this video are from the same scanner/ scanning method and software settings. But prior to editing this vid, we tried 2 different methods then settled for this one. Please join our fb group for the full explanation that we’ll post soon. :)
@@ThirtyFiveStudio - Excellent. I misunderstood. By the way, I noticed similar results with my own tests. Ultramax has nice skin tones, Fuji is a bit magenta, Lomo has good contrast but I also noticed that Lomo also has great skin tones if you overexpose a bit. It is all subjective though. Thanks for the response and the video.
Could you do a video on how you work w/models? Topics I'm interested in learning are-how to direct poses, expressions, outfits to wear-everything. Thank you!
Enjoyed the video, overall i preferred the results from the Ultramax, however the Lomo gave some good images too, i particularly like the one at 3:44, i think the colours in the windows are very good. Good model too, is she professional?
sometimes it is hard to see the difference because the white balance isn't consistent but i like the photos, the model and the shooting process. good job
Scanner! There is actually no "right from the negative", not in scanning and also not in darkroom printing. Enlarging in the darkroom might interpret the negative differently, but there are also some RGB settings to be set. Everything "direct" is only relying on "auto" or "default".
keep up the good work and don't get discouraged. focus isn't a necessity in reviewing film and some missed focus shots ar part of the beauty of the analog process
man, you sure you didn't mix any scans and names? Besides the terrible and unexpected outcome from the superia, in some groups it looked like the color pattern swapped between ultramax and superia like at 4:13 I'm thinking you might have messed up on scanning. :-(
almost every shot (except for max and lomo shots) are underexposed due to a in-camera light meter, a retry from the things you've learned since then would be a nice second part.
Great vid guys! How come some of the photos had different exposure? Same settings ba between the three films? Or super unpredictable lang talaga ng light?
Cheaper films are responding poorly to underexposed scenarios. Some more than others. I believe the difference would've been less obvious if they shot in a well lit environment or exposed a little brighter. I would recommend watching this video if you're interested comparing different film stocks: th-cam.com/video/pitm2n2CWIY/w-d-xo.html
I really like the concept on this video but I also have to say that although the photos honestly came out amazing, I don't feel that the film stocks were fairly compared to each other and don't really SUPER accurately represent how each film stock looks, since it wasn't tested in broad daylight. At least sana as an additional test or category, the indoor shots could be taken as a set of their own on how they do indoors. In general, just a critique for improvement is to make it clear that film performs differently in different settings (could've expounded on what Gab said, since its a relatively short video naman).
Agreed! Our film comparison videos should always be taken with a pinch of salt. There are multiple variables that can affect a film stock's performance (lens coating, ambient light, film development, etc). We might make follow up vids in the future testing them under daylight. Thanks for the constructive criticism!
Your methods could be more scientific. 1 The daylight can change brightness direction and color through the window from shot to shot... especially with that much time between shots 2 The cameras could have variances in their shutter speeds 3 Shooting handheld instead of using a tripod could introduce variables
Not gonna lie this review is really crappy especially since that “magenta” color from Fuji is caused by underexposing. Next use a light meter instead of the in camera meter.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 84 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องศึก vs เมืองไทย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3kuzsAIDf1c/mqdefault.jpg)
[OUTRO CORRECTION]
Hey guys Derald here, in the outro I mixed it up. Fuji was more magenta surprisingly. The results from this roll are contrary to the usual green tint of Fuji. Not sure if this is because of the scanning or because the photos were shot indoor. We need to make a follow-up vid on this.
you should have marked the roll head with marker pen.
@@lanchanoinguyen2914 good idea, thanks!
Colour shift is more strong when the image is underexposed. By the lack of detail in the blacks and shadows I think you guys have exposed for the highlights. When I want natural skin tones, I meter for the skin and open 1 stop. Film can handle highs quite well.
Btw, nice video!
What's the title of the soundtrack?
Ultramax 400 looks better
i think so!
I like the lomo
Hi guys, I had the feeling most images were a bit underexposed, was it intentionally? Liked the video, nice job!
I'm not sure why you went to the trouble of using the same lens and cameras then used two different scanners. For a controlled experiment I would have thought you would have scanned using the same scanner and software.
QNetX For clarification, all photos shown in this video are from the same scanner/ scanning method and software settings. But prior to editing this vid, we tried 2 different methods then settled for this one. Please join our fb group for the full explanation that we’ll post soon. :)
@@ThirtyFiveStudio - Excellent. I misunderstood. By the way, I noticed similar results with my own tests. Ultramax has nice skin tones, Fuji is a bit magenta, Lomo has good contrast but I also noticed that Lomo also has great skin tones if you overexpose a bit. It is all subjective though. Thanks for the response and the video.
Try out these films next :D Kodak Portra 400 vs Fuji Pro 400H vs Agfa vista 400
Interesting suggestion! We'll consider it!
Agfa Vista is superia
Super stoked to know that a lot of Kabayans are very much into film Photography. Keep on keepin' on you guys!
Thanks kapatid!!
Could you do a video on how you work w/models? Topics I'm interested in learning are-how to direct poses, expressions, outfits to wear-everything. Thank you!
There are many TH-cam videos with posing . Or just try pinterest. That works for me
Enjoyed the video, overall i preferred the results from the Ultramax, however the Lomo gave some good images too, i particularly like the one at 3:44, i think the colours in the windows are very good. Good model too, is she professional?
I like that too! She's not, but very much well could be!!
sometimes it is hard to see the difference because the white balance isn't consistent but i like the photos, the model and the shooting process. good job
100%. Thanks!!
Those colder tones of LOMO400 though!
I just bought some Ultramax 400 film to try out. Thank for the vid it was really helpful!
Glad it helped, Mike!
the photos are super amazing. the ultramax is what i love
Great comparison video guys. Do you have any videos of shooting in Cebu?
Unfortunately none YET!
Scanner!
There is actually no "right from the negative", not in scanning and also not in darkroom printing. Enlarging in the darkroom might interpret the negative differently, but there are also some RGB settings to be set. Everything "direct" is only relying on "auto" or "default".
You're right!
Really great video! Thank you!
Much appreciated, Nuno!
For me it's UltraMax > Lomo > Superia. The Lomo looks great for more moody shots
keep up the good work and don't get discouraged. focus isn't a necessity in reviewing film and some missed focus shots ar part of the beauty of the analog process
Thanks for this, dukkhey :)
Lomo FTW! Scanner down below please
man, you sure you didn't mix any scans and names?
Besides the terrible and unexpected outcome from the superia, in some groups it looked like the color pattern swapped between ultramax and superia like at 4:13
I'm thinking you might have messed up on scanning. :-(
Good eye, will review it!
I have the mixed feeling about the Lomography 800. Some photos look good kinda openness, but others showing the random weird casts all over the place.
I kinda see what you mean!
Superia for the win!
almost every shot (except for max and lomo shots) are underexposed due to a in-camera light meter, a retry from the things you've learned since then would be a nice second part.
Thanks for the idea! :)
I think if you pull the Fuji Superia 400 in 1 stop it'll look a little better. ✌
Would be a good idea to try this, thanks!
Whats the name of that song?
Nothing Lasts by LiQWYD, it's also in the description for the link!
how did you meter?!
Great images
According to the stuff I read online, the lomo 400 is not a true iso 400 they rated it as iso 200.
Ohhh, will look into this, thanks!
Ultramax’s better for portraits and the others excel in other areas. All great in their own way but this shoot is more suited for the Ultramax.
Kinda have to agree there
Superia4Life!
I think at 3:25 you’ve interchanged Ultramax and Lomo
Wow, Ultramax 400 look so great, i'll try it!
Nice!!
I'm not a fan of UltraMax but it looks good indoors
You're right, not too versatile, but has its strengths :)
escanor down below
Ok, guys, but what about the camera settings? A, T, expocorrection?
All were shot under aperture priority, with spot metering at 0 exp comp.
Scanner! Also, who’s that other photographer? Hahahahaha
That's our idol! haha
Scanner down below
Great vid guys! How come some of the photos had different exposure? Same settings ba between the three films? Or super unpredictable lang talaga ng light?
Cheaper films are responding poorly to underexposed scenarios. Some more than others. I believe the difference would've been less obvious if they shot in a well lit environment or exposed a little brighter. I would recommend watching this video if you're interested comparing different film stocks: th-cam.com/video/pitm2n2CWIY/w-d-xo.html
Were they shot at box speed?
“SCANNER down
below”
Love Kodak!
I really like the concept on this video but I also have to say that although the photos honestly came out amazing, I don't feel that the film stocks were fairly compared to each other and don't really SUPER accurately represent how each film stock looks, since it wasn't tested in broad daylight. At least sana as an additional test or category, the indoor shots could be taken as a set of their own on how they do indoors. In general, just a critique for improvement is to make it clear that film performs differently in different settings (could've expounded on what Gab said, since its a relatively short video naman).
Agreed! Our film comparison videos should always be taken with a pinch of salt. There are multiple variables that can affect a film stock's performance (lens coating, ambient light, film development, etc). We might make follow up vids in the future testing them under daylight. Thanks for the constructive criticism!
Ultramax seems to have the most true to life color, in my opinion.
why the hell superia 400 looks like kodak and kodak looks like fujifilm?
lânchánđời nguyễn Hahah that is exactly what I was thinking.
can you make a video on where we can buy film cameras
We've done this, but you're right, definitely needs an updated video! :)
Hi, can I request on how to use film camera with broken lightmeter?
Get a light meter app on your phone
Learn the sunny 16 rule
You should meter on the shadow bro
true
Wow! That Ultramax 400 looks so good. I'm gonna immediately buy a roll. Oh and, Pinoy Power!!! hahaha
Pinoy power haha!
#teamlomo
Lomo 400 look a bit better ( less dark)
Agreed
nice comparison
Thanks, Wahyu!
That superia 🤢. The UltraMax is the best imo. The lomo has great colors too but I prefer the um400.
Haha! Good review!
Scanner Down Below
Love Ultramax 400. Probably my favourite film.
same!
Lomo is too blue and Superia is too magenta
True!
Keep it going!
Thank you, Ticha! :)
Lomo CN400 Rocks!!!!!!
🙌🙌🙌
SCANNER down below
Scanner Down Below
Please
SCANNER down below!!!
Only Kodak for me.
Scanner
Kodak look better for her skin tone
❤️ ❤️ ❤️
The Fuji shots does not look right. Or maybe I have not shot film for too long to remember...
Hmm, we should also probably shoot it more too! :)
SCANNER!!!!
Scammer down below
lomo 400 ftw!
Your methods could be more scientific.
1 The daylight can change brightness direction and color through the window from shot to shot... especially with that much time between shots
2 The cameras could have variances in their shutter speeds
3 Shooting handheld instead of using a tripod could introduce variables
Not gonna lie this review is really crappy especially since that “magenta” color from Fuji is caused by underexposing. Next use a light meter instead of the in camera meter.
Unfortunately that is true
When they coined the term "Sex Sells" I think you missed the highlighted memo staing that to accomplish you actually have to be attractive...
what a sad person you must be to comment that
Expired film naman hehe
Scanner down below
Scanner
Scammer down below
Scanner down below
Scanner down below
Scanner down below
Scanner