Introduction to Legal Positivism | Jurisprudence

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @thelawacademy1
    @thelawacademy1  ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If you have any questions, let us know in the comments below!

  • @Advocate4Peace-i9p
    @Advocate4Peace-i9p 16 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    I really appreciate you, you are doing well and you are trying to explain and internalize jurisprudence in to our mind that we lack from our academic teachers and also it is also appreciated. please keep it up for
    the sake of us and also your satisfaction

  • @akinmoladunoluwanifemi8622
    @akinmoladunoluwanifemi8622 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the explanation. I understand what it means now!

  • @andiakram1829
    @andiakram1829 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for posting this

  • @Uhoh11111
    @Uhoh11111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool !!

  • @Mike-o4z5tThais
    @Mike-o4z5tThais 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Time distincts of scope teeter popularity and positivity put to order of law. Structure noncontradictorily, right the first time. The tenacity and intellect may at times, not be polite. If your delight is to will a hailstorm, at least be in latitudes several north of Tropics.

  • @Mike-o4z5tThais
    @Mike-o4z5tThais 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The "rejections" attempt to dissclude that which came into view of biased controlling interest and was not fitting to working smart continuity establishment or contingent, prospectively not going to hold gains, keep returns and get things done. Enter elements true, "right thinking on all" and ethics, moral basis, noncontradictory inclusion which eliminates conflict best by right firstly prevent and from at 'start' having been built. ..solid, ..soar.

  • @MrGazzbazz
    @MrGazzbazz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Confused. At 5:22 you say that law and morality are necessarily connected, but you have written that they are NOT necessarily connected. Which is it?