Yes bro you are Turkic Oghurs...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oghur_languages i think Chuvash people,Tatars,Magyaras and Bulgars descents of Huns,Khazars,Avars and Bolgars...
+Dmitry Kaškāraev You were Attila's Huns. So were the Bulgarians, then they turned Slavic. But all of those first Bulgarian kings were the very sons of Attila!
+Miroslav V that man says that -THEİR BULGAR ORİGİN COMES FROM TURKİC ORİGİN. not from turkey turk,but bulgar turkic........................do you understand. because,TURKEY TURKS are OGUZ turks,but BULGARS were OGUR turks.
+Dmitry Kaškāraev i live In Bulgaria , we dont speak you langluge , we use slavic , do you use the cyrillic letters А Б В ? i read in net you want to change you name of the contry to Volga Bulgaria or its a lie
WOW my grandmother was Chuvash and this is the first time I see Chuvash people, and I can say I look exactly like them, Russian with a slight asiatic/Turkish touch. Many people think I'm Tatar or Russian. Also very impressive culture, I'm going to visit Chuvashia very shortly and I'm very exited.
@@haunebu421chuvashs are tatar-turks,like the bulgars,but most of them think,they are slavic. chuvash is a turkic language, they are the only remnant of the R turkic branch,the other spoken turkish dialects are all Z dialects... u can still find R turkish in hungarian,sumerian,bulgarian if u compare the old languages.
Дорогие братя Булгары, привет из Дунавской Болгарий! Здесь мы может быть смесь Булгары, славяне и фракийцы, но глубохо в наших сердцах мы будем помнить наш Волжской Булгарский корень! Братя, наша Булгарская кровь это то, что соединяет нас! Вспомните, мы очень сильние! Вспомните Великую Болгарию! Дерзайте, братя! Однажды, мы БУДЕМ вместе!
Мы почти забыли родство - мы еле выжили после 1236 года от татаро-монгол. Сейчас вспоминаем историю, Великую Историю общих Болгар. Если поеду на Дунай - то поеду к родственникам:) я всем говорю, когда по TV показывают Дунайских Болгар, что это мои родственники💪
@@Boyarin-Bulgarin volgadak cavus cayı konusan volga bulgarları dıllerını kaybetmemıs ler turkceyı konusuyor kafkasalrdak kafkas balkar turklerıde turkce konusuyor ana dıllrını unutmamıslar ama tunaya gelenler kısa zamanda hırıstıyanlastıkdan sonra hızlaanadıllerı bulgar turkcesını unutmuslarsımdı bulgarıstanda yasayan musluman turklerırı osmanlı zamanından anadoludan gelıp yerlesenlerı turk dıor ve kendılerının slav bulgar larız dıyrolartatar dedıklerınızde mogol deyıl mogolca konusmuyorlar onlarda tatar turkcesı konusuyorlar ve onlarda atalarının volga bulgarları oldugunu soyluyorlar haberın olsun
@@Boyarin-Bulgarin The Bulgarians are Turks but they do not come from the Oguz branch like the Anatolian Turks. Like the Indo-Europeans who divided into several branches (Germanic, Celtic, Italic, Slavs, Greek, Illyric, Indo/Aryan, Anatolian) the Turks also divided into several branches. Except that their divisions are much more recent and therefore their languages are still more or less understandable between them. Concerning the Bulgares Turks, part of these Bulgarians migrated to present-day Bulgaria where they mixed with the Slavs and were culturally and ethnically Slavized so that the Bulgarians as Turkic tribes only the name remained.The bulgarians who immigrated north towards the Volga. They also ended up creating a Bulgarian state with Bolgore as its capital. These Bulgarian Turks remained Turkish and continued to speak their Bulgarian Turkish language. They adopted Islam. Then arrived the Mongols, the latter had incorporated into their troops numbers of Turcs tribes who had remained in Mongolia and whom the Mongols had defeated. One of these Turkic tribes was called Tatars. These Tatars were at the forefront of the Mongol troops. The Turkish-Muslim Tatars in the service of the Mongols subjugate the Muslim Turkish Bulgarians of the Volga. Over time, the Volga Bulgarians abandoned the Bulgarian version of the Turkic language and adopted the Tatar version of the Turkish language. The Turkish Bulgarians then became Turkish Tatars. The Chuvash come from these Bulgarian Turks who mixed with Indo-Iranian tribes like the Scythians but also Finno-Ugric tribes and Slavs. The Chuvash remained pagans for a long time then they became Muslims and it was in the 19th century that they converted to Russian Orthodoxy. It must be remembered that the Turks left Mongolia and made Central Asia their country except that when they arrived in Central Asia this region was populated by Iranian peoples who were Turkized. Subsequently these "modified" Turks continued their routes either towards the south-south/west (the Oguz branch of the Seljuks) or towards the north-north/west towards the Volga, the Ukrainian plains where they continued to mix with Iranian tribes (Sarmatian Alans, all descendants of the Scythians) either Finno-Ugric (Ural region) or to a lesser extent with Slavs. Thus the properly Turkish race does not exist. You are considered Turkish if your father is Turkish.
Tonight, I`ll drink to our brothers, who our founding fathers settled in Thesallonika, Dobrudja, Napoli and Upper-Volga. Eternal glory to Khan Kubrat and his descendents: - Kotrag, Asparukh, Bat-Bayan, Kuber and Alzec. Cheers from Danube Bulgaria. - A devout orthodox christian, pure descendant of bulgars.
@@УПАҫуриthe volga tatars are also bulgars. Tatar is acc a word used by the mongol colonisers. however i was watching a video off a muah thats a muskim priest from tatarstan he said it simple " My Home is danube bulgaria my land is russia " so the people there think off them selves as bulgars seeningly. or so i noticed
Моя бабушка рассказывала -во время насешствия красивых женщин и девушек забирали с собой , чтоб их дети были красивыми ,а раньше высокого роста с голубыми глазами светленькие были ,а сейчас все смешалось -говорила ,смесь бульдога с носорогом
Nice. My family can trace its origins to a territory that was actually settled by Altzek's 700 Bulgars, to the territory around Isernia. Also, as a bonus, I also have the same kind of Far-Eastern eyes you find on Mongolid peoples.
+Atilla türk they are not turks they want a new name not Chuvashia not Turkey - Bulgaria because they are Bulgarians , real Bulgarians are not slavs not turkish , they are diffrent people
+ivan ivanov CHUVASHS are OGUR TÜRKS...............TURKEY TÜRKS are OGUZ TURKS..............................DİFFERENT TÜRK GROUPS but TÜRKS............... BOTH COME FROM HUNS.........
they are STİLL speaking OGUR TURKİSH...................NOT SLAVİSH.................THEY ARE STİLL TURKİC............İN TURKEY we are speaking OGUZ turkish............
@@firtinabay1 the languages has sonstruction its gramar , and breeks its words, danube bolgar has more slavic words chuvash has more turkish but gramar is that who have to be mainly...it its difficult to explain but the folc costume are so similar...
Eric Tyce In kos khol ro niga toro joone madaret! "they are not real turk" aakhe khaaarkosse olaagh...toro che be in ann-khoriaa amoghli ?? aaghaa ostaade nejaad parastie...loool...boz
Eric Tyce KOON pesar,,,i have ur IP adress & ur hash ID...i'm tracking ur steps...every single one!!! halaa sookhti??? besooz madar jende... LONG LIVE IRIB and PRESSTV
Привет от България. До казаното, че днешните българи за славяни това е напълно поглешно. Езикът ни е слявянски, но българския народ не прилича на никой друг славянски. Найстина монголоидността ни е нулева, а при древните българи е била видима при 15-20 % от населението и предимно при черепи на мъже, и изкуствена деформация на черепа до 80% (хунска практика). Това констатират учени проучвали района на Велика България и Дунавска 8-9 в. Всеки може да отвори в интернет и да разгледа българско национално облекло. Приликите при женските дрехи с чувашките е направо удивителни имайки в предвид, че живеем на хиляди километри разстояние и нямаме никакъв културен обмен.
Bulgarians are not turks ! Who are we Bulgarians. Where is our homeland? What are our origins? The answers to these questions are lost in the distant past despite many theories and assumptions about our roots. One thing is certain - our ancestors lived in the lands of ancient Asia. It remains to be seen from what part of Asia exactly they came to Europe. In scientific circles the thesis on the Persian origins is finding more and more followers. These days, a Bulgarian scientific expedition has left for Iran in search of our roots. Scientists are unanimous and believe that the Bulgarians today represent a genetic cocktail of different tribes and peoples who once lived in our territories for a shorter or longer time. The proof - there is no such thing as a definite type of Bulgarian - he could very well be brown or blond, with blue or brown eyes, tall and slender or short and stocky, etc. The Slavs, Thracians and Protobulgarians are obviously those who left the most important traces in the genetic profile of Bulgarians today.The researchers of the great scientific expedition are however convinced that in our veins the Protobulgare blood dominates and that our ancestors did not come from North Siberia as was believed for a long time, but from the territories of Iran and the Pamir massif. . If scientists can find any evidence for this hypothesis, the Bulgarians' version of Slavic identity will be denied. "In the days of socialism we were 'brothers' with the Russians and that is why our Slavic genes had to dominate. But in truth most Bulgarians do not have the characteristic features of Slavs and when they go to Russia they are asked which ex-Soviet republic they come from ”, explains Alexander Iliev, scientist of the expedition and director. scene from the documentary trilogy on the origins of the Bulgarians broadcast by Bulgarian National Television. This researcher believes that there are undeniable facts which prove the hypothesis of our Persian roots. As, for example, the bas-relief of the knight "Rag e modar", discovered in Afghanistan, bas-relief which in fact is at the origin of the bas-relief of the Knight of Madara near the town of Chumene in northern Bulgaria , dating from the 8th century. It is believed that the word "madar" originates from the word "modar" and is related to the worship of the god Mitra, who for his part is of Iranian origin. Monuments similar to the Knight of Madara have been found in Iran. Linguists, for their part, have discovered that in the Farsi language there are some 800 identical words with the Bulgarian language, some of these words having been adopted by the Bulgarian language via Arabic or Turkish. Let's not talk about the similarities in customs, religious beliefs, cultural traditions. And even : “The curious coincidences are mainly in sciences like genetics, for example, explains Alexander Iliev. We managed to develop a non-representative sample of 58 DNA tests at Pamir which proved a great similarity between our peoples. Research on the anthropology of modern Bulgarian on the other hand shows 40% of coincidences with our distant ancestors of the Pamirs and Afghanistan. We are probably, therefore, part of this great Persian civilization! " Members of the expedition will search Iran for almost a month of libraries and archives, have talks with historians and scholars to gather enough evidence for their hypothesis about our Persian origins. In fact, this is not the first such expedition. Alexander Iliev asserts that all the research so far leads to the following conclusion: “Our information, which coincides moreover with that of many historians of this period, indicates that approximately 150 years after Christ begins the great emigration of the populations of the north of Afghanistan and the south of Tajikistan, emigration caused by the invasion of the "white" Huns, as they are called. After bloody battles, the Bulgarians, along with other peoples, left these regions and settled in the Caucasus. From that moment the history of our people is known. The Bulgarians stay in the Caucasus, build their cities there, etc. Historic Greater Bulgaria was formed during the time of Khan Koubrat, while his son, Asparouh, was the one who brought the Bulgarians to the territories it occupies today and it is he who is the founder of the First Bulgarian State . ".
Turkey's own brother at the Chuvash Turks. The Arabs have never been and will not be our brothers in the Chuvash Turks, Uygur Turks, Turks Bashkir our racial brothers and sisters. Greetings from Turkey, Oguz Turks.
Not really invaded but more like helped organize and develop the land. Plus most Turkic people were nomadic, and the those lands were once inhabited by European Scythians, so it's a very debatable topic...
Chuvash are descendants of Attila. European conqueror Attila... Chuvash are the relatives of the Turks and Hungarians.we are members of a large Turkish family.We love you our Chuvash brothers and sisters.
Да Вы правильно отметили, в том числе насчет Аттиллы, как его в Европе называли "Бичом божим". Но Чувашский Народ чтит своего предводителя, и в честь него они назвали самую крупную реку Европы - Атăл, что означает Аттилла.
kazım Akkaya Depends what do you mean when saying "relatives" :) genetically? Linguistically? culturally? We Hungarian are maybe one of the strangest people in the world. Linguistically we are finno -ugrians, but our genetically fahrest relatives are the Finns Lapps and Estonians... :) We have the biggest amount of Middle East genes in Europe... Culturally Arpads people were close to Turks having the same religion Tengriism. We livede under Turkic peoples influence we have a big amount of Turkic words, but only 25 percent of them are of Ogur-Turkic (Hunnic, Bulgar, Chuvash)origin the other 75% are old Turkish influence... But our old folklore - music, rithms - is very similar of Chuvash. I had listen to some Chuvash songs, on their rithm I could dace Csardas... :)
+kazım Akkaya That is far fetched theory! The ancestors of Huns is Xiongnu, who were themselves earlier Xianyun, that is Cimmerians! The Xianyun/Cimmerians invaded China in 823 BC, and finally destroyed the western-Chou state in 771 BC. After this time they returned to Mongolia where they become the ancestors of Huns/Xiongnu tribe!
+Friedrich Kass I do not know, how do you make a connection between these peoples... ("Xianyun, that is Cimmerians!") The Cimmerians or Kimmerians (Greek: Κιμμέριοι, Kimmerioi) were an ancient Indo-European people living north of the Caucasus and the Sea of Azov as early as 1300 BC[1]until they were driven southward by the Scythians into Anatolia during the 8th century BC. Linguistically they are usually regarded as Iranian, or possibly Thracian with an Iranian ruling class.After their exodus from the Pontic steppe the Cimmerians probably assaulted Urartu about 714 BC, but in 705, after being repulsed by Sargon II of Assyria, they turned towardsAnatolia and in 696-695 conquered Phrygia. In 652, after taking Sardis, the capital of Lydia, they reached the height of their power. Soon after 619, Alyattes of Lydia defeated them. There are no further mentions of them in historical sources, but it is likely they settled in Cappadocia.[2] (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cimmerians ) The Xianyun (simplified Chinese: 猃狁; traditional Chinese: 獫狁; pinyin: Xiǎnyǔn; Wade-Giles: Hsien-yün) was an ancient nomadic tribe that invaded China during the Zhou Dynasty.[1] This Chinese exonym is written with xian 獫 or 玁 "long-snouted dog", and this "dog" radical 犭 is commonly used in graphic pejorative characters. Scholars identify the Xianyun with the Quanrong and Xiongnu.[2]en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xianyun
Friedrich Kass There is no connection with the Xianyun and Kimmers. But, Xiongnu with Huns the same people that clearly written in Chinese sources. "Turks (Tuk-yu) is Hun (Xiong-nu) folks" clearly mentioned in written sources in China.
Altaic blood should be pretty strong. Living in the area of Scythians and Sarmatians the Chuvash have to look similar to Altaic looking Russians of the Volga region. It also shows up in the genetic pool (18%, while Russians 47%). But it's not Asian proper. Though there is a small percentage of Japanese looking persons among Chuvash, too.
these bulgars are also ethnjcally slavs they just speak a turkic language. only in tatarstan do they have the bulgar blood left which is acc not so much to. unfortunately they have apparently tried to stay away from their chuvash brothers.
Ни один Народ на Земле не имет Право либо возвышаться или прининижаться перед другими Народами. Все Народы Земли имеют одинаковые Права, только ошибочка, как его (Право) Исполняют
Българите сме от ирански произход. не сме тюрки. Независимо от това дали сме се събрали със славяни, кавказци, юдеи и други. Ние сме народ държавнотворен - строили сме градове, създавали сме науки и сме войни. И сме създали всички държави, където сме минали. За съжаление само една носи името България - Дунавската. НЕ СМЕ ТЮРКИ!
Историческата наука по цял свят знае, че огурите, кутригурите (предците на днешните чуваши), утигурите, и нашите собствени предци - уногурите, са турански народи! Тове че вие с основание сте намразил турците, както още много наши сънародници, не променя историята! В културата си носим елементи не само от иранската култура, но и от други култури! В Алтай и Тян Шан има много български топоними, имена на върхове и градове - това е огромна територия, населявана от турански народи! Българският средноазиатски календар е тюркски! Нашето тотемно животно винаги е бил КОНЯТ, също както при хазарите това е било кучето! Хазарите имат същото устройство на висшето държавно управление като нас, българите (с малко по-други названия на титлите)! Българската войска има изцяло тюркска структура -- две крила, едното се води от владетеля - имаме кавхан, таркан и т.н.! Вярата в бог Тангра е характерна и до ден днешен за българите и казахите! Съгласен съм, че като градостроители, и въобще като строители, сме много по-развити от всички други тюркски народи! Надявам се и като държавостроители! : ) Виждам, че сте по-скоро с гръцко име, а не с иранско : ) - няма лошо разбира се!
Bulgarian's not are slavian! All are trackin's people. They DNA now is as Italian's Ungarian's north Greece and north Turkey's peoples. Bulgarian's people are a lot and living in to many countries with different name's.
+ivo Kotov Yes, thats true! The descendants of proto or old-Bulgarians are everywhere, also in Hungary, who were originally Onogurs, hence their name: Venger, Hungary, Ungarn, Ungherese etc.. in many diferent European language! The real Bulgars settled in many countries and played an inportant role in the ethogenesis of several nations!
Your comment is very funny man! ;-) May be you are wanna be delete your comment after my answer FRIEDRICH KASS Every one men know - if were have learn. Every people has be successful(just with one L) in different history time! Above I'm wrore on the it less countries. We living to day, in more countries with different names. Do you remember that! The people start learn when 6- years old. You can start now! You are there isn't time men :-) :-) :-) :-) ★
@@friedrichkass1644 Hungarians were never Onoghurs, but finno-ugric speaking people, Magyars. They are only called Onoghurs becouse Bizantynes first met them when they were mercenaries of the Onoghur allience. This is why they named them Ongri. In reality hungarians never called themselves anything like that.
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’) Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674 Utrigurs (Utighurs) Oghur-Bulghar Turkic group, located south-east of the Don River, near the Sea of Azov, and traditional enemies of the related ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-4918 Bolgar, Tatarstan/Russia (Bulgar, Bulgar al-Cadid, Kuybyshev) By the 15th century it was known as Bulgar al-Cadid ‘New Bulgar’ after the Turkic-speaking Volga Bulgars. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191905636.001.0001/acref-9780191905636-e-8397 Bulgars, Turkic, also Proto-Bulgarians, Pra-Bulgarians, a pastoral people, originally living in Central Asia. Swept westward in the great movement of steppe peoples ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-0850 Kuvrat (Κοβρα̑τος, according to Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica 2:161f), khan of the Onogur Bulgars; died after 642. Patr. Nikephoros I mentions his revolt against the Avars and alliance with Herakleios; Kuvrat was granted ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100045529 Kubrat , of the royal Duloclan, ‘lord of the Ononghundur-Bulgars and Kotrags [Kutrigurs?]’ www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Dulo+clan&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River. academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/10/2220/963437 Chuvash is the sole living representative of the Bulgharic branch, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family. oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001/oso-9780198804628-chapter-28 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations. www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4CBA0E2CB74C8093EC1CA38C95067D55/S2513843X20000183a_hi.pdf/_div_class__title__Early_nomads_of_the_Eastern_Steppe_and_their_tentative_connections_in_the_West__div_.pdf In the Hunno-Bulgarian languages /r/ within a consonantic cluster tends to disappear projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible. academic.oup.com/jole/article-pdf/5/1/39/32972809/lzz010.pdf The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) Turkish tribes who founded a kingdom (9th-12th century) in the region between the Volga and the Kama. www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/divers/Bulgares_de_la_Volga_et_de_la_Kama/110545 The Bulgars,,Turkish people who were formed on the Don. www.universalis.fr/recherche/l/1/napp/23625 Although the Bulgars were originally a Turkic-speaking people from Asia, they merged with the Slavic tribes whom they conquered in the 7th cent. www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/arts/language/linguistics/bulgarian-language The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
Turkic is name not for ethnical origin but language. I understand that there are some Turkish dreaming to unify all Muslims in Russia and the region against Russia, but that wont happen. Repeating that Bulgars have turkic descent doesn't mean that they have cultural or ethnic origin with turks.
@@0xe849 The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28] An ethnolinguistic group (or ethno-linguistic group) is a group that is unified by both a common ethnicity and language. So we can say Turkic is one ethnicity just like German,French,Albanian,Bulgarian or Circassian.
I don't think they are %100 real mongolid - turkic people.But they don't look like slavic.At least most of this chuvashes have got more asian eyes than todays anatolian - turkish people.I am from Turkey.
+Murat Kuran Even the Proto-Altaics began as mixed Eurasians. Today some Turks are white, some are yellow, some are a mixture. But they are all equally Turkic.
@HunHorda Danube Bulgars are coming from Itil (Volga) who are now chuvash. Mixed of some ogur and hunnic tribes. ("BULGAR" means "MIXED" in old Turkish. Even now we use the verb "bula-mak" in modern Turkish. When they relocate to Danube, took some slavic tribes (and illiric, I think) into them rule, with turkics. While the turkics are weakening, orthodox christianity and Slavic language became dominant.
Bulgarians are not turks ! Who are we Bulgarians. Where is our homeland? What are our origins? The answers to these questions are lost in the distant past despite many theories and assumptions about our roots. One thing is certain - our ancestors lived in the lands of ancient Asia. It remains to be seen from what part of Asia exactly they came to Europe. In scientific circles the thesis on the Persian origins is finding more and more followers. These days, a Bulgarian scientific expedition has left for Iran in search of our roots. Scientists are unanimous and believe that the Bulgarians today represent a genetic cocktail of different tribes and peoples who once lived in our territories for a shorter or longer time. The proof - there is no such thing as a definite type of Bulgarian - he could very well be brown or blond, with blue or brown eyes, tall and slender or short and stocky, etc. The Slavs, Thracians and Protobulgarians are obviously those who left the most important traces in the genetic profile of Bulgarians today.The researchers of the great scientific expedition are however convinced that in our veins the Protobulgare blood dominates and that our ancestors did not come from North Siberia as was believed for a long time, but from the territories of Iran and the Pamir massif. . If scientists can find any evidence for this hypothesis, the Bulgarians' version of Slavic identity will be denied. "In the days of socialism we were 'brothers' with the Russians and that is why our Slavic genes had to dominate. But in truth most Bulgarians do not have the characteristic features of Slavs and when they go to Russia they are asked which ex-Soviet republic they come from ”, explains Alexander Iliev, scientist of the expedition and director. scene from the documentary trilogy on the origins of the Bulgarians broadcast by Bulgarian National Television. This researcher believes that there are undeniable facts which prove the hypothesis of our Persian roots. As, for example, the bas-relief of the knight "Rag e modar", discovered in Afghanistan, bas-relief which in fact is at the origin of the bas-relief of the Knight of Madara near the town of Chumene in northern Bulgaria , dating from the 8th century. It is believed that the word "madar" originates from the word "modar" and is related to the worship of the god Mitra, who for his part is of Iranian origin. Monuments similar to the Knight of Madara have been found in Iran. Linguists, for their part, have discovered that in the Farsi language there are some 800 identical words with the Bulgarian language, some of these words having been adopted by the Bulgarian language via Arabic or Turkish. Let's not talk about the similarities in customs, religious beliefs, cultural traditions. And even : “The curious coincidences are mainly in sciences like genetics, for example, explains Alexander Iliev. We managed to develop a non-representative sample of 58 DNA tests at Pamir which proved a great similarity between our peoples. Research on the anthropology of modern Bulgarian on the other hand shows 40% of coincidences with our distant ancestors of the Pamirs and Afghanistan. We are probably, therefore, part of this great Persian civilization! " Members of the expedition will search Iran for almost a month of libraries and archives, have talks with historians and scholars to gather enough evidence for their hypothesis about our Persian origins. In fact, this is not the first such expedition. Alexander Iliev asserts that all the research so far leads to the following conclusion: “Our information, which coincides moreover with that of many historians of this period, indicates that approximately 150 years after Christ begins the great emigration of the populations of the north of Afghanistan and the south of Tajikistan, emigration caused by the invasion of the "white" Huns, as they are called. After bloody battles, the Bulgarians, along with other peoples, left these regions and settled in the Caucasus. From that moment the history of our people is known. The Bulgarians stay in the Caucasus, build their cities there, etc. Historic Greater Bulgaria was formed during the time of Khan Koubrat, while his son, Asparouh, was the one who brought the Bulgarians to the territories it occupies today and it is he who is the founder of the First Bulgarian State . ";
Thanks Sis!Among Ogurs before Bulga Ogurs,there were tribe Sary Ogurs,wich mean silver,white Ogurs.I think they are at least partly grandfathers of chuvash people ...
Bulgarians are not turks ! Who are we Bulgarians. Where is our homeland? What are our origins? The answers to these questions are lost in the distant past despite many theories and assumptions about our roots. One thing is certain - our ancestors lived in the lands of ancient Asia. It remains to be seen from what part of Asia exactly they came to Europe. In scientific circles the thesis on the Persian origins is finding more and more followers. These days, a Bulgarian scientific expedition has left for Iran in search of our roots. Scientists are unanimous and believe that the Bulgarians today represent a genetic cocktail of different tribes and peoples who once lived in our territories for a shorter or longer time. The proof - there is no such thing as a definite type of Bulgarian - he could very well be brown or blond, with blue or brown eyes, tall and slender or short and stocky, etc. The Slavs, Thracians and Protobulgarians are obviously those who left the most important traces in the genetic profile of Bulgarians today.The researchers of the great scientific expedition are however convinced that in our veins the Protobulgare blood dominates and that our ancestors did not come from North Siberia as was believed for a long time, but from the territories of Iran and the Pamir massif. . If scientists can find any evidence for this hypothesis, the Bulgarians' version of Slavic identity will be denied. "In the days of socialism we were 'brothers' with the Russians and that is why our Slavic genes had to dominate. But in truth most Bulgarians do not have the characteristic features of Slavs and when they go to Russia they are asked which ex-Soviet republic they come from ”, explains Alexander Iliev, scientist of the expedition and director. scene from the documentary trilogy on the origins of the Bulgarians broadcast by Bulgarian National Television. This researcher believes that there are undeniable facts which prove the hypothesis of our Persian roots. As, for example, the bas-relief of the knight "Rag e modar", discovered in Afghanistan, bas-relief which in fact is at the origin of the bas-relief of the Knight of Madara near the town of Chumene in northern Bulgaria , dating from the 8th century. It is believed that the word "madar" originates from the word "modar" and is related to the worship of the god Mitra, who for his part is of Iranian origin. Monuments similar to the Knight of Madara have been found in Iran. Linguists, for their part, have discovered that in the Farsi language there are some 800 identical words with the Bulgarian language, some of these words having been adopted by the Bulgarian language via Arabic or Turkish. Let's not talk about the similarities in customs, religious beliefs, cultural traditions. And even : “The curious coincidences are mainly in sciences like genetics, for example, explains Alexander Iliev. We managed to develop a non-representative sample of 58 DNA tests at Pamir which proved a great similarity between our peoples. Research on the anthropology of modern Bulgarian on the other hand shows 40% of coincidences with our distant ancestors of the Pamirs and Afghanistan. We are probably, therefore, part of this great Persian civilization! " Members of the expedition will search Iran for almost a month of libraries and archives, have talks with historians and scholars to gather enough evidence for their hypothesis about our Persian origins. In fact, this is not the first such expedition. Alexander Iliev asserts that all the research so far leads to the following conclusion: “Our information, which coincides moreover with that of many historians of this period, indicates that approximately 150 years after Christ begins the great emigration of the populations of the north of Afghanistan and the south of Tajikistan, emigration caused by the invasion of the "white" Huns, as they are called. After bloody battles, the Bulgarians, along with other peoples, left these regions and settled in the Caucasus. From that moment the history of our people is known. The Bulgarians stay in the Caucasus, build their cities there, etc. Historic Greater Bulgaria was formed during the time of Khan Koubrat, while his son, Asparouh, was the one who brought the Bulgarians to the territories it occupies today and it is he who is the founder of the First Bulgarian State . ".
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars. The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people. Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
"Ilk Türkceden" türeyen iki dialekt/lehce vardir. Bunlarin ikiside Türk dili olmakla birlikte, bir kolu "ana Türkce" diger kolu ise "ana Bulgarca" diye adlandirilir. Ilk Türkceden bütün Türk dilleri gelismistir. Ana Bulgarcadan 3 dialekt/lehce türemistir: 1)Tuna/Donau/Danubian Bulgarcasi 2.)Kuban Bulgarcasi ve 3.) Volga Bulgarcasi. Volga Bulgarcasindan bilgidimiz Türk dili olan "Chuvash"ca gelismisir. Ana Türkceden ise bu gün bütün diger Türkdiller türemistir.
Дагодухаш! 7хиляди години преди да измислят’турция’ я е имало България и се е говорило на Български из цяла днешна Русия, това е обединяващият език на руската държава. А съвременна Турция е създадена от родопския Българин ‘Ататюрк’за да ви извади от Средновековието и да ви направи нормални хора. Защото до Анкара всички сте Българи.
BULGAR,AVAR,HAZAR,KABAR,SADAGAR,SUVAR,GUJAR,AVSHAR............................................ETC.................................................................. ALL ARE TURKS..............................DESCENDANTS OF HUNS...................................
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Turkic is name not for ethnical origin but language. I understand that there are some Turkish dreaming to unify all Muslims in Russia and the region against Russia, but that wont happen. Repeating that Bulgars have turkic descent doesn't mean that they have cultural or ethnic origin with turks.
@@0xe849 The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28] An ethnolinguistic group (or ethno-linguistic group) is a group that is unified by both a common ethnicity and language. So we can say Turkic is one ethnicity just like German,French,Albanian,Bulgarian or Circassian.
@@papazataklaattiranimam , you are funny do you know? :) You don't even know the difference between ethnical and language origin. By your words the Australians have the same ethnical as the Amerikans and Britains, and the Brazilians with the Portugueses etc. etc.
ıYı - На Бога се уповаваме! In God we trust... Това е стар български символ, с хилядолетна приемственост, 5 - 6 хилядолетия пр. Хр., слагал се е най-вече на крепостни стени, щитове, шлемове и мечове... както и на талисмани. На маговата звезда или Розетата от Плиска и на много други места по цяла България.
ıYı It's also the symbol (tamga in Turkic) of Kayı clan. Who are Kayı people? They are Ottomans. www.google.com.tr/search?q=tamgalar+ve+t%C3%BCrk+boylar%C4%B1&rlz=1C1HLDY_trTR792TR792&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjh2cqj2ufdAhXrB8AKHcALD3IQ_AUIDigB&biw=1366&bih=626#imgrc=_ Here, different Oghuz Turkic tribe tamgas.
+Ebuzer .Yılmaz Old Bulgars are not turkic, they are Uralic. Chuvash have a language mixed with Tatar (a Turkic people) because for centuries, the Tatars ruled over us, but before that, as far from 500-1150 the territories of the Volga were populated by 'Old Bulgars', who were not Turkic. The reason they moved first to the Black Sea where they formed Khazaria, and another group further to Romania and today's Bulgaria, is mainly because Turkic tribes kept coming in from Asia, attacking their settlements and stealing cattle, causing hunger. I don't want to offend anyone, but that is just history I learned from my grandparents on Chuvash's.
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars. The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people. Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
wrong. the tatars were mongols. they subdued the volga bolgars, the cumans and other turkic people in the 13th century and the name just stuck with the wider turkic population. todays kazan tatars are in fact volga bolgar descendants. they speak turkic like their ancestors. they also spoke turkic before the tatars overrun them in 1236. how do we know that. well it wasn't the mongol tatars who brought the turkic language to the volga bolgars. the volga bolgars turkic language is documented in historical data centuries ago. lol
kapgan And, somehow mysteriously, the name of the country which he was the ruler was the gooood "Old Great Bulgaria "👍 NO old great tatarstania NO old great tourkia NO old great turkmenistania NO old great oghuzstania NO old great ogurstania NO old great Bulgarian k(h)aganat or any kind of -- stan " Just a good proud "Old Great Bulgaria" with the the ruler named Kaisar/Kessarr/Caesar Kubrat!👍 And you keep reading Wikipedia 🙊🤥😂😂😂
дать бы в глаз автору, нихрена не знает про то, кто такие чуваши! мы не тюрки и не относимся к тюркоязычным группам, наш язык вообще считается обособленным и исторически не видоизменившимся со времён волжской булгарии!!! какие тюрки когда их тут даже и не было близко!!!
I am very happy that the Huns came through it all and found a lovely home in the Urals. I hope some day Chuvashia will be independent. In the old days Attila was the most important man in the world.
There are 2 general mistakes here. 1st - Chuvash people are mixture of central european & mediterranean stock-(DNA analysis) The fact they speak turkic is irrelevant. They are strongly influenced from Volga Bulgaria (their folklore costumes & embroideries are bulgarian). 2nd mistake - Bulgarians are of Iranian stock (DNA analysis), not turkic. fyi there is no difference between Bulgar & Bulgarian. Don't get confused by wiki articles-thats not serious studies..
No no, chuvash national this is clear BULGAR people... old country Volzhskaya Bulgaria. Now time country Bulgaria this is mix slovanian people and bulgar people
Lipoksai is prominent in the Iranian mythology as Athrosiab and a son of Tur, closely paralleling the Herodotus' descent of Lipoksai from Targitai. The Türkic legends continue the epic line of the Herodotus' myths, affording Lipoksai and Arpoksai a position of the Alps, while the youngest Koloksai is given a deified position. Ref. Z.Gasanov "Royal Scythians", p. 204-209, 272). Herodotus IV 5, 6, M.I. Artamonov, History of the Scythians in Soviet science, VDI, 1947, No 3.
4/ Yakuts are not pure mongoloids, they're Eurasians. Yakuts might look almost completely mongoloid to the untrained eye but so do Bashkirs that are 95% paternally Caucasian (mostly Europid). It's the exact same thing with Yakuts; the mtDNA of Yakuts is almost purely mongoloid represented by the haplogroups D, C, B and G which are all purely mongoloid maternal haplogroups. In conclusion, Yakuts are a mixture of Indo-European male that knock up mongolo-Siberian females.
+Friedrich Kass "Chuvash are a Finno-Ugric tribes Turkicized in language!" I also made this presumption myself, but I have no proof. Have you any proof?
+Attila Vandra It has been scientifically proved! They were Mari tribe originally, but mixed with Sabirs and Khazars! The Kazan-Tatars call them with that ethnonym, obviously they know them in past, who they were!
+Friedrich Kass Can you give me a link? (Maybe in English or a latin letter writing language... (I do not read Cyrillic...) "The Kazan-Tatars call them with that ethnonym" Which one? Mari?
+Attila Vandra You should search in webb, I only investigate with Huns and Xiongnu origin! Now, here is text about the Xianyun: "Their name has been identified not only with the Xiongnu, but also with the Cimmerians of the western source" !! Give this text in Google, and then you can see what I claim! The famous Byzantine historian and secretary of emperor Belizar, Prokopius from Cesare, properly claim that the original name of the Huns were Cimmerian ancient times! Huns are really Cimmerians, believe it or not!
Like every ethnic group on the Earth ,Chuvash people are result of mix of subethnics-antar,viryal and others...they poses genetic rooots from Bulgars,Sabars(Suvars),Fino-Ugrics and probably more.They were put to Ortodox religion by Ivan Terible .He used enourmos violence and cruelty upon them. Some very small percent of Chuvash still serve old pagan rituals...hope that help )
With my respects, nations don't about our genetics, our phenotypes. Yes, westerners generally think that way. But nations are about languages, traditions, not about our apperance. It's wrong also very disgusting idea.
J85 It is bulgarian propaganda,bulgars are clearly turkic origin not others They spoke only Turkic language en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgars According to university and encyclopedia sources in Wikipedia including harvard,oxford,cambridge and many others Also Bulgars are still Turkic peoples like Balkars,Volga Tatars and Chuvashes
J85 From Harvard page 354 Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World Author: Glen Warren Bowersock, Peter Brown, Oleg Grabar Bulgars The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false The only surviving language from this linguistic group is believed to be Chuvash. Harvard Professor Omeljan Pritsak in his study "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan" (1982)[10] concluded that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the Hunnic languages, as he calls the Oghur languages.[11]
Their ancestors did come from Siberia and intermix with the local population (the Indo-Europeans) so to say they don't have "Mongoloid" in them is entirely un-true.
+VideoDk Turkish is the nationality of Turkey, Turkic is a whole bunch of different nationalities who all have a common origin with the Turks of Turkey. Turks are only one of the many Turkic peoples.
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars. The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people. Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
bulgars are turkic and they have several branches. bulgarians on the other hand are a slavic people with no connection bulgar, chuvash or any other turkic people. the last remnants of turkic bulgars in thrace and danube died 1000 years ago and completely assimilated into the local slavic population.
@hunnoturk haplogroup Q has been found in approximately 4% of Southern Altaians and 32% of Northern Altaians.[12] It is found in 16% of Tuvans. The frequency of Q in northern China is about 4%, with many Chinese samples of haplogroup Q belonging to the subclade Q-M120.[15][16] Haplogroup Q is found in approximately 3% of males in Tibet and Mongolia. It is also found in 3% of Uyghurs. Very low marker for "Sino-Tibetans", however if you said same as Native Americans, then I'd agree.
Hungarians are of course uralic. Indeed, I've read so in many sources. You're uralic and adopted customs from other people, such as huns and bulgars, onogurs, khazars and kabars. Of course, not suggesting that you were linguistically related to them. You speak magyar, an ugric language, while the huns, onogurs and etc. spoke Lir-turkic, significantly different from eachother.
Dude, you should learn more about those people: 'One is that they originated from a mixing between the Turkic Suar and Sabir tribes of Volga Bulgaria with local Mari tribes and also the Finno-Ugrian[13] population of the Volga Basin. ' You've left incorrect comment
I don't know if the bulgarian language is slavic or not (for me it has much slavic in it), but the faces I see in the movie are similar to our bulgarian faces in Bulgaria.
also russians say "nas" like bulgarians, whereas spanish say "nos". "datj" "daj" is the same in Russian and bulgarian, in Spanish it's dar, also a bit similar because slavic and latin languages are related somehow, both are indoeuropean. in italian it's dare... "probi" is also the same as in Russian, from "probavatj". "pasti" also exists in Russian,
I know Spanish and some Bulgarian and I have yet to see the first word which is similar to Spanish(except "luna" , moon, which is also the same in Russian). A lot of words in Bulgarian are very similar to Russian.
chuvashs are tatar-turks,like the bulgars,but most of them think,they are slavic. chuvash is a turkic language, they are the only remnant of the R turkic branch,the other spoken turkish dialects are all Z dialects... u can still find R turkish in hungarian,sumerian,bulgarian if u compare the old languages.
The grave of the one of the 5 brothers - Alcek IS FOUND in Italy and they recognized him as SCULLS FROM IRANIC ETHINIC GROUP. In his grave he is with his horse which only the proto-Bulgarians used. ;)
Beutifull turkic origin people unfortunatly they are so assimilated with russian so they are not much turkic today as their ances they are so russified but one day we will retake this lands and we will turkify them again today russian girls are so love in turkish mam we will turkify russians too we are so strong country with strong population
that's right, but spanish and bulgarian don't understand eachother as well. Bulgarians and Russians understand a great deal of eachother. And Russian is not only based on old slavonic but equally on eastern slav languages. Ukrainians and Bulgarian also understand many words.
Ancient Turkic sounds like bulgars-hazars branch, the oldest one, which was used by huns. The only language ramained from this branch is chuvash. It has no similarity to slavic languages at all. At all I said. Civilizers of east slavs were greeks from byzantine, not bulgars. So you missed here. I understand bulgarian a lot from russian. Modern bulgarians are descendants from north caucasus bulgars (khan asparukh) and slavs.
Bulgars - Southern Huns. Known in Chinese annals with 216 the year. Lived at that time in Shanxi, China. The name means "Five tribes". Etymology output only in the Chuvash language (R-L- type, archaic language). Later in Sogdiane mixed with Yueh-chi. Titles "Baltavar", the "Savan" in the Volga Bulgaria (922 years, in the manuscript of Ibn Fadlan) proihodit of Sogdiana. Chuvash - also from the language of the Yueh-chi. This clan name. "Chobach" - "the shadow, protection of the king"
The Chuvash language belongs to the Turkic language family, but it's so distintict from other Turkic languages that it's rather classified (together with some other extinct languages of this branch) as a Bulgaric (or Oghur) language as opposed to Turkic proper. There is also no evidence that the ancestors of Chuvash people ever called themselves Turks.
some races identifed by DNA alike Aryans, however Turks assymulated many Indo European people, and those assymulated one consider them as Turkic This makes Turkic more complicated and make it only can be identified by the idiology rather than blood.
Tengrian deity Umai. The Greek analogue Gea is a primowomb, a grandmother of Zeus; so is Scythian Api and Türkic Umai (OTD 611). Umai cognates are “umai” = womb, “um” = stomach, “uma” = mama. Other Tr. cognates are “api/abi/aby/avy/apa/abba/aba/apai” = respectively mama/senior sister/mother's sister/father's senior sister/father's mother/appellation “madam“/husband's sister/woman. Semantically, Api is an apogee of motherhood and womanhood. For Iranian etymology,
@PlevenNikopolTURKi, the proto-bulgars are from balkh, that is - iranian. bulgars mixed with other people from further east in later times and thus turkicized but their root is iranian. in bulgarian you can find many turkic words, however, there are as many words, which do not exist in turkic, as they are iranian. for example, how can you explain with turkic origin of the following macedonian bulgarian names - balshi, korcha, devol, chargan (grevena), struga, ohrid, prespa, prilep, vardar (var)?
no dear, you are wrong, Turk is the name for all people who have TurkIC identity..People of Turkey called Turks of Turkey, people of Chuvashia are called Turks of Chuvashia and your language is Chuvashian Turkic. Regards, Loves and Respects from Azerbaijan
The Bulgarians are Turks but they do not come from the Oguz branch like the Anatolian Turks. Like the Indo-Europeans who divided into several branches (Germanic, Celtic, Italic, Slavs, Greek, Illyric, Indo/Aryan, Anatolian) the Turks also divided into several branches. Except that their divisions are much more recent and therefore their languages are still more or less understandable between them. Concerning the Bulgares Turks, part of these Bulgarians migrated to present-day Bulgaria where they mixed with the Slavs and were culturally and ethnically Slavized so that the Bulgarians as Turkic tribes only the name remained.The bulgarians who immigrated north towards the Volga. They also ended up creating a Bulgarian state with Bolgore as its capital. These Bulgarian Turks remained Turkish and continued to speak their Bulgarian Turkish language. They adopted Islam. Then arrived the Mongols, the latter had incorporated into their troops numbers of Turcs tribes who had remained in Mongolia and whom the Mongols had defeated. One of these Turkic tribes was called Tatars. These Tatars were at the forefront of the Mongol troops. The Turkish-Muslim Tatars in the service of the Mongols subjugate the Muslim Turkish Bulgarians of the Volga. Over time, the Volga Bulgarians abandoned the Bulgarian version of the Turkish language and adopted the Tatar version of the Turkish language. The Turkish Bulgarians then became Turkish Tatars. The Chuvash come from these Bulgarian Turks who mixed with Indo-Iranian tribes like the Scythians but also Finno-Ugric tribes and Slavs. The Chuvash remained pagans for a long time then they became Muslims and it was in the 19th century that they converted to Russian Orthodoxy. It must be remembered that the Turks left Mongolia and made Central Asia their country except that when they arrived in Central Asia this region was populated by Iranian peoples who were Turkized. Subsequently these "modified" Turks continued their routes either towards the south-south/west (the Oguz branch of the Seljuks) or towards the north-north/west towards the Volga, the Ukrainian plains where they continued to mix with Iranian tribes (Sarmatian Alans, all descendants of the Scythians) either Finno-Ugric (Ural region) or to a lesser extent with Slavs. Thus the properly Turkish race does not exist. You are considered Turkish if your father is Turkish.
I am Chuvashian. Yes, we are the Volga Bulgars. Yes, we speak the language of the Volga Bulgar. And yes, our language belongs to the Turkic.
Yes bro you are Turkic Oghurs...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oghur_languages i think Chuvash people,Tatars,Magyaras and Bulgars descents of Huns,Khazars,Avars and Bolgars...
+Cantonese Taishanese That what I personally believe, Chuvash could be Mari tribe who had been turkicized in language!
+Dmitry Kaškāraev You were Attila's Huns. So were the Bulgarians, then they turned Slavic. But all of those first Bulgarian kings were the very sons of Attila!
+Miroslav V that man says that -THEİR BULGAR ORİGİN COMES FROM TURKİC ORİGİN. not from turkey turk,but bulgar turkic........................do you understand. because,TURKEY TURKS are OGUZ turks,but BULGARS were OGUR turks.
+Dmitry Kaškāraev i live In Bulgaria , we dont speak you langluge , we use slavic , do you use the cyrillic letters А Б В ?
i read in net you want to change you name of the contry to Volga Bulgaria or its a lie
WOW my grandmother was Chuvash and this is the first time I see Chuvash people, and I can say I look exactly like them, Russian with a slight asiatic/Turkish touch. Many people think I'm Tatar or Russian. Also very impressive culture, I'm going to visit Chuvashia very shortly and I'm very exited.
bro the chuvash are Bulgars but on the volga they were forced to change the name of their people by the Bulagophobic lenin and his followers
@@haunebu421 Chuvash people are Turkic, and they originated from Oghur-Turks
@@haunebu421Lenin was Chuvash
@@haunebu421chuvashs are tatar-turks,like the bulgars,but most of them think,they are slavic. chuvash is a turkic language, they are the only remnant of the R turkic branch,the other spoken turkish dialects are all Z dialects... u can still find R turkish in hungarian,sumerian,bulgarian if u compare the old languages.
Дорогие братя Булгары, привет из Дунавской Болгарий! Здесь мы может быть смесь Булгары, славяне и фракийцы, но глубохо в наших сердцах мы будем помнить наш Волжской Булгарский корень! Братя, наша Булгарская кровь это то, что соединяет нас! Вспомните, мы очень сильние! Вспомните Великую Болгарию! Дерзайте, братя! Однажды, мы БУДЕМ вместе!
😀, будем вместе ... , коней запрягем
Мы почти забыли родство - мы еле выжили после 1236 года от татаро-монгол. Сейчас вспоминаем историю, Великую Историю общих Болгар. Если поеду на Дунай - то поеду к родственникам:) я всем говорю, когда по TV показывают Дунайских Болгар, что это мои родственники💪
@@Boyarin-Bulgarin volgadak cavus cayı konusan volga bulgarları dıllerını kaybetmemıs ler turkceyı konusuyor kafkasalrdak kafkas balkar turklerıde turkce konusuyor ana dıllrını unutmamıslar ama tunaya gelenler kısa zamanda hırıstıyanlastıkdan sonra hızlaanadıllerı bulgar turkcesını unutmuslarsımdı bulgarıstanda yasayan musluman turklerırı osmanlı zamanından anadoludan gelıp yerlesenlerı turk dıor ve kendılerının slav bulgar larız dıyrolartatar dedıklerınızde mogol deyıl mogolca konusmuyorlar onlarda tatar turkcesı konusuyorlar ve onlarda atalarının volga bulgarları oldugunu soyluyorlar haberın olsun
@@СергейДубинин-ъ8и get the volga tatars on board and we return our glorious opressed brothers in North macedonia !
@@Boyarin-Bulgarin The Bulgarians are Turks but they do not come from the Oguz branch like the Anatolian Turks. Like the Indo-Europeans who divided into several branches (Germanic, Celtic, Italic, Slavs, Greek, Illyric, Indo/Aryan, Anatolian) the Turks also divided into several branches. Except that their divisions are much more recent and therefore their languages are still more or less understandable between them. Concerning the Bulgares Turks, part of these Bulgarians migrated to present-day Bulgaria where they mixed with the Slavs and were culturally and ethnically Slavized so that the Bulgarians as Turkic tribes only the name remained.The bulgarians who immigrated north towards the Volga. They also ended up creating a Bulgarian state with Bolgore as its capital. These Bulgarian Turks remained Turkish and continued to speak their Bulgarian Turkish language. They adopted Islam. Then arrived the Mongols, the latter had incorporated into their troops numbers of Turcs tribes who had remained in Mongolia and whom the Mongols had defeated. One of these Turkic tribes was called Tatars. These Tatars were at the forefront of the Mongol troops. The Turkish-Muslim Tatars in the service of the Mongols subjugate the Muslim Turkish Bulgarians of the Volga. Over time, the Volga Bulgarians abandoned the Bulgarian version of the Turkic language and adopted the Tatar version of the Turkish language. The Turkish Bulgarians then became Turkish Tatars. The Chuvash come from these Bulgarian Turks who mixed with Indo-Iranian tribes like the Scythians but also Finno-Ugric tribes and Slavs. The Chuvash remained pagans for a long time then they became Muslims and it was in the 19th century that they converted to Russian Orthodoxy.
It must be remembered that the Turks left Mongolia and made Central Asia their country except that when they arrived in Central Asia this region was populated by Iranian peoples who were Turkized. Subsequently these "modified" Turks continued their routes either towards the south-south/west (the Oguz branch of the Seljuks) or towards the north-north/west towards the Volga, the Ukrainian plains where they continued to mix with Iranian tribes (Sarmatian Alans, all descendants of the Scythians) either Finno-Ugric (Ural region) or to a lesser extent with Slavs. Thus the properly Turkish race does not exist. You are considered Turkish if your father is Turkish.
Привет от България!
благодаря за коментаpa.за съжаление никой от парламента или правителството не се интересуват от нашите братя.....????
You are so many beotiful People.
We love you. We are bulgarian❤️
Больше всех в детстве я любила свою родную бабушку - тетюшскую чувашку. Для меня она до сих пор жива в моем сердце.
*Salam Aleykum Chuvash Brothers From Azerbaijan* 🇦🇿❤️
Azeri iranians and Chuvash Bulgarians have nothing in common lmao
@@khanusmagnus577 Name of the land is Azerbaijan but the people living in Azerbaijan are Turks.
Tonight, I`ll drink to our brothers, who our founding fathers settled in Thesallonika, Dobrudja, Napoli and Upper-Volga. Eternal glory to Khan Kubrat and his descendents:
- Kotrag, Asparukh, Bat-Bayan, Kuber and Alzec.
Cheers from Danube Bulgaria.
- A devout orthodox christian, pure descendant of bulgars.
Чуваши один в один похожи на нас, татар. Сразу видно родная кровь! :))
Моя девушка чувашка :) Привет братьям от башкирских татар!
Больной что-ли.
Татары на Волге только в 14 веке появились .. так что вот так . Изучай. Наоборот у вас в в татарах десятки тысяч чувашей смешались ,приняли ислам .
@@УПАҫуриthe volga tatars are also bulgars. Tatar is acc a word used by the mongol colonisers. however i was watching a video off a muah thats a muskim priest from tatarstan he said it simple " My Home is danube bulgaria my land is russia " so the people there think off them selves as bulgars seeningly. or so i noticed
Моя бабушка рассказывала -во время насешствия красивых женщин и девушек забирали с собой , чтоб их дети были красивыми ,а раньше высокого роста с голубыми глазами светленькие были ,а сейчас все смешалось -говорила ,смесь бульдога с носорогом
Nice.
My family can trace its origins to a territory that was actually settled by Altzek's 700 Bulgars, to the territory around Isernia.
Also, as a bonus, I also have the same kind of Far-Eastern eyes you find on Mongolid peoples.
thing is we are not mongoloid your eyes have nothing to do with this genetics have proven old Bulgars have nothing in common with mongoloids
Nice people, greetings from Hungary.
Один из сыновей Кубрата со своим народом ушел в Венгрию,значит в Венгрии тоже наши братья булгары живут
@@ЧерновСлава Please english!
Wonderful to have a small spot on your history books :)
Чуваши не стесняйтесь языка своего ---- жизненоважного языка твоего!!!!!
Чувашия,я тебя люблю!
+Алексей Макаров какая бы ни была
Самая лучшая для меня , Я чувашка и я люблю всех добры́х людей на земле не зависимо кто какой национальности и
I have heard about it too,I am from Hungary :)
Greetings from Danube Bulgaria, Volga bros ! :)
Вот они, чистокровные булгаро хазары.
Раш Шаг Все правильно, согласен с Вами.
А я не согласен, это народ ВЕДА! Не тюрки! Мари их называет сюасламари!
Greetings Brothers from Hungary!
Long live the turanian Brotherhood !Turaan!
Привет из Казани!
I love that among Chuvash people it possible to meet all sort of faces, mixture of blue or dark eyes,blond hair dark hair...incredible
ÇUVAŞS:OGURS:TURKS:THE MOST BEAUTİFUL and HANDSOME PEOPLE OF THE WORLD.
+Atilla türk they are not turks they want a new name not Chuvashia not Turkey - Bulgaria because they are Bulgarians , real Bulgarians are not slavs not turkish , they are diffrent people
+ivan ivanov CHUVASHS are OGUR TÜRKS...............TURKEY TÜRKS are OGUZ TURKS..............................DİFFERENT TÜRK GROUPS but TÜRKS............... BOTH COME FROM HUNS.........
they are STİLL speaking OGUR TURKİSH...................NOT SLAVİSH.................THEY ARE STİLL TURKİC............İN TURKEY we are speaking OGUZ turkish............
Chuvash peoples is one of the most ancient Turks.
Красивый народ
I,m not slav and I do not know much for slavs.Thanks for watching!
прекрасньім людям талантливому народуЧУВАШИИ сердечньій привет и наи лучшие пожелания...
+василь давид , Василь спасибо от чуваш, благосклонных к нам. Прииезжайте в Чебоксары и увидите
Украинцам, своим собратьям Огромный Привет от Чуваш
Какие красивье девушки..
Greetings from Bulgaria (Danube), brothers and sisters. We love you!
Bulgars slavic - Chuvash Turkic ?
@@firtinabay1 the languages has sonstruction its gramar , and breeks its words, danube bolgar has more slavic words chuvash has more turkish but gramar is that who have to be mainly...it its difficult to explain but the folc costume are so similar...
The traditions, folklor, the way of clothing says it all, those people are related to what is now Bulgaria (in southeastern europe)
long live turkic brothers
they are not real Turkic .. Turkic people live in central asia have almond eyes and yellow skin like kazakhs and khyrgyzs
stupid persian gypsy chuvashs were most older turkic people .
Eric Tyce In kos khol ro niga toro joone madaret! "they are not real turk" aakhe khaaarkosse olaagh...toro che be in ann-khoriaa amoghli ?? aaghaa ostaade nejaad parastie...loool...boz
Northwest Biotherapeutics to inja chikar mikoni I.R.I piresag stalker??? .. boro too kanale PressTV or IRIB .. You I.R.I fuck
Eric Tyce KOON pesar,,,i have ur IP adress & ur hash ID...i'm tracking ur steps...every single one!!! halaa sookhti??? besooz madar jende...
LONG LIVE IRIB and PRESSTV
They are in fact turkic. Ask them if you want? And the language they spoke is absolutely turkic... There is no doubt about that
Привет от България.
До казаното, че днешните българи за славяни това е напълно поглешно. Езикът ни е слявянски, но българския народ не прилича на никой друг славянски. Найстина монголоидността ни е нулева, а при древните българи е била видима при 15-20 % от населението и предимно при черепи на мъже, и изкуствена деформация на черепа до 80% (хунска практика). Това констатират учени проучвали района на Велика България и Дунавска 8-9 в.
Всеки може да отвори в интернет и да разгледа българско национално облекло. Приликите при женските дрехи с чувашките е направо удивителни имайки в предвид, че живеем на хиляди километри разстояние и нямаме никакъв културен обмен.
+Denitsa Ivanova Чуваши потомки Атиллы и скулы хунские у почти всех
Никой не сме предали. Времето си минава и историята се забравя и преоткрива. До скоро повечето хора не са дори знаели кой е Атила.
Bulgarians are not turks !
Who are we Bulgarians. Where is our homeland? What are our origins? The answers to these questions are lost in the distant past despite many theories and assumptions about our roots. One thing is certain - our ancestors lived in the lands of ancient Asia. It remains to be seen from what part of Asia exactly they came to Europe. In scientific circles the thesis on the Persian origins is finding more and more followers. These days, a Bulgarian scientific expedition has left for Iran in search of our roots.
Scientists are unanimous and believe that the Bulgarians today represent a genetic cocktail of different tribes and peoples who once lived in our territories for a shorter or longer time. The proof - there is no such thing as a definite type of Bulgarian - he could very well be brown or blond, with blue or brown eyes, tall and slender or short and stocky, etc. The Slavs, Thracians and Protobulgarians are obviously those who left the most important traces in the genetic profile of Bulgarians today.The researchers of the great scientific expedition are however convinced that in our veins the Protobulgare blood dominates and that our ancestors did not come from North Siberia as was believed for a long time, but from the territories of Iran and the Pamir massif. . If scientists can find any evidence for this hypothesis, the Bulgarians' version of Slavic identity will be denied. "In the days of socialism we were 'brothers' with the Russians and that is why our Slavic genes had to dominate. But in truth most Bulgarians do not have the characteristic features of Slavs and when they go to Russia they are asked which ex-Soviet republic they come from ”, explains Alexander Iliev, scientist of the expedition and director. scene from the documentary trilogy on the origins of the Bulgarians broadcast by Bulgarian National Television. This researcher believes that there are undeniable facts which prove the hypothesis of our Persian roots. As, for example, the bas-relief of the knight "Rag e modar", discovered in Afghanistan, bas-relief which in fact is at the origin of the bas-relief of the Knight of Madara near the town of Chumene in northern Bulgaria , dating from the 8th century. It is believed that the word "madar" originates from the word "modar" and is related to the worship of the god Mitra, who for his part is of Iranian origin. Monuments similar to the Knight of Madara have been found in Iran. Linguists, for their part, have discovered that in the Farsi language there are some 800 identical words with the Bulgarian language, some of these words having been adopted by the Bulgarian language via Arabic or Turkish. Let's not talk about the similarities in customs, religious beliefs, cultural traditions. And even :
“The curious coincidences are mainly in sciences like genetics, for example, explains Alexander Iliev. We managed to develop a non-representative sample of 58 DNA tests at Pamir which proved a great similarity between our peoples. Research on the anthropology of modern Bulgarian on the other hand shows 40% of coincidences with our distant ancestors of the Pamirs and Afghanistan. We are probably, therefore, part of this great Persian civilization! "
Members of the expedition will search Iran for almost a month of libraries and archives, have talks with historians and scholars to gather enough evidence for their hypothesis about our Persian origins. In fact, this is not the first such expedition. Alexander Iliev asserts that all the research so far leads to the following conclusion:
“Our information, which coincides moreover with that of many historians of this period, indicates that approximately 150 years after Christ begins the great emigration of the populations of the north of Afghanistan and the south of Tajikistan, emigration caused by the invasion of the "white" Huns, as they are called. After bloody battles, the Bulgarians, along with other peoples, left these regions and settled in the Caucasus. From that moment the history of our people is known. The Bulgarians stay in the Caucasus, build their cities there, etc. Historic Greater Bulgaria was formed during the time of Khan Koubrat, while his son, Asparouh, was the one who brought the Bulgarians to the territories it occupies today and it is he who is the founder of the First Bulgarian State . ".
Finno-Ugric is Udmurt, Komi, and others. All genetic clusters of the Chuvash and Tatars are identical (R1a1,R1b, N2, N3 and others)
Turkey's own brother at the Chuvash Turks. The Arabs have never been and will not be our brothers in the Chuvash Turks, Uygur Turks, Turks Bashkir our racial brothers and sisters. Greetings from Turkey, Oguz Turks.
@Accelerated ?
@Accelerated Churvash are turks you stupif slavdog
Accelerated you are crazy animal! Your source is your ass pls show your Evidence 😂😂😂
Not really invaded but more like helped organize and develop the land.
Plus most Turkic people were nomadic, and the those lands were once inhabited by European Scythians, so it's a very debatable topic...
Chuvash are descendants of Attila. European conqueror Attila... Chuvash are the relatives of the Turks and Hungarians.we are members of a large Turkish family.We love you our Chuvash brothers and sisters.
Да Вы правильно отметили, в том числе насчет Аттиллы, как его в Европе называли "Бичом божим". Но Чувашский Народ чтит своего предводителя, и в честь него они назвали самую крупную реку Европы - Атăл, что означает Аттилла.
kazım Akkaya Depends what do you mean when saying "relatives" :) genetically? Linguistically? culturally? We Hungarian are maybe one of the strangest people in the world. Linguistically we are finno -ugrians, but our genetically fahrest relatives are the Finns Lapps and Estonians... :) We have the biggest amount of Middle East genes in Europe... Culturally Arpads people were close to Turks having the same religion Tengriism. We livede under Turkic peoples influence we have a big amount of Turkic words, but only 25 percent of them are of Ogur-Turkic (Hunnic, Bulgar, Chuvash)origin the other 75% are old Turkish influence... But our old folklore - music, rithms - is very similar of Chuvash. I had listen to some Chuvash songs, on their rithm I could dace Csardas... :)
+kazım Akkaya That is far fetched theory! The ancestors of Huns is Xiongnu, who were themselves earlier Xianyun, that is Cimmerians! The Xianyun/Cimmerians invaded China in 823 BC, and finally destroyed the western-Chou state in 771 BC. After this time they returned to Mongolia where they become the ancestors of Huns/Xiongnu tribe!
+Friedrich Kass I do not know, how do you make a connection between these peoples... ("Xianyun, that is Cimmerians!")
The Cimmerians or Kimmerians (Greek: Κιμμέριοι, Kimmerioi) were an ancient Indo-European people living north of the Caucasus and the Sea of Azov as early as 1300 BC[1]until they were driven southward by the Scythians into Anatolia during the 8th century BC. Linguistically they are usually regarded as Iranian, or possibly Thracian with an Iranian ruling class.After their exodus from the Pontic steppe the Cimmerians probably assaulted Urartu about 714 BC, but in 705, after being repulsed by Sargon II of Assyria, they turned towardsAnatolia and in 696-695 conquered Phrygia. In 652, after taking Sardis, the capital of Lydia, they reached the height of their power. Soon after 619, Alyattes of Lydia defeated them. There are no further mentions of them in historical sources, but it is likely they settled in Cappadocia.[2] (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cimmerians )
The Xianyun (simplified Chinese: 猃狁; traditional Chinese: 獫狁; pinyin: Xiǎnyǔn; Wade-Giles: Hsien-yün) was an ancient nomadic tribe that invaded China during the Zhou Dynasty.[1] This Chinese exonym is written with xian 獫 or 玁 "long-snouted dog", and this "dog" radical 犭 is commonly used in graphic pejorative characters. Scholars identify the Xianyun with the Quanrong and Xiongnu.[2]en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xianyun
Friedrich Kass There is no connection with the Xianyun and Kimmers. But, Xiongnu with Huns the same people that clearly written in Chinese sources. "Turks (Tuk-yu) is Hun (Xiong-nu) folks" clearly mentioned in written sources in China.
Altaic blood should be pretty strong. Living in the area of Scythians and Sarmatians the Chuvash have to look similar to Altaic looking Russians of the Volga region. It also shows up in the genetic pool (18%, while Russians 47%). But it's not Asian proper. Though there is a small percentage of Japanese looking persons among Chuvash, too.
Bulgarians are slavic not Bolgar Turkic
these bulgars are also ethnjcally slavs they just speak a turkic language. only in tatarstan do they have the bulgar blood left which is acc not so much to. unfortunately they have apparently tried to stay away from their chuvash brothers.
Ни один Народ на Земле не имет Право либо возвышаться или прининижаться перед другими Народами. Все Народы Земли имеют одинаковые Права, только ошибочка, как его (Право) Исполняют
Българите сме от ирански произход. не сме тюрки. Независимо от това дали сме се събрали със славяни, кавказци, юдеи и други. Ние сме народ държавнотворен - строили сме градове, създавали сме науки и сме войни. И сме създали всички държави, където сме минали. За съжаление само една носи името България - Дунавската. НЕ СМЕ ТЮРКИ!
Историческата наука по цял свят знае, че огурите, кутригурите (предците на днешните чуваши), утигурите, и нашите собствени предци - уногурите, са турански народи! Тове че вие с основание сте намразил турците, както още много наши сънародници, не променя историята! В културата си носим елементи не само от иранската култура, но и от други култури! В Алтай и Тян Шан има много български топоними, имена на върхове и градове - това е огромна територия, населявана от турански народи!
Българският средноазиатски календар е тюркски! Нашето тотемно животно винаги е бил КОНЯТ, също както при хазарите това е било кучето! Хазарите имат същото устройство на висшето държавно управление като нас, българите (с малко по-други названия на титлите)! Българската войска има изцяло тюркска структура -- две крила, едното се води от владетеля - имаме кавхан, таркан и т.н.! Вярата в бог Тангра е характерна и до ден днешен за българите и казахите! Съгласен съм, че като градостроители, и въобще като строители, сме много по-развити от всички други тюркски народи! Надявам се и като държавостроители! : )
Виждам, че сте по-скоро с гръцко име, а не с иранско : ) - няма лошо разбира се!
Не си чел книги ти, а? Тук си намчерил място да говориш глупости и да срамиш народа!!!
Ти все повече затъпяваш бе, момче!!!
Prekrasnoi klip ,baite, imeite ocen zdarove, kasmet brati Bulgari.
Bulgarian's not are slavian! All are trackin's people. They DNA now is as Italian's Ungarian's north Greece and north Turkey's peoples. Bulgarian's people are a lot and living in to many countries with different name's.
+ivo Kotov Yes, thats true! The descendants of proto or old-Bulgarians are everywhere, also in Hungary, who were originally Onogurs, hence their name: Venger, Hungary, Ungarn, Ungherese etc.. in many diferent European language! The real Bulgars settled in many countries and played an inportant role in the ethogenesis of several nations!
Yes, to many countries and many speaking in order language- Anymore in seguente, how in Turkey, Macedonia, Greece, Bulgaria
Your comment is very funny man! ;-) May be you are wanna be delete your comment after my answer FRIEDRICH KASS
Every one men know - if were have learn. Every people has be successful(just with one L) in different history time! Above I'm wrore on the it less countries.
We living to day, in more countries with different names.
Do you remember that! The people start learn when 6- years old. You can start now! You are there isn't time men :-) :-) :-) :-) ★
+ivo Kotov You are Huns who speak a Slavic language, and who now have much Thraco-Moesian blood.
@@friedrichkass1644 Hungarians were never Onoghurs, but finno-ugric speaking people, Magyars. They are only called Onoghurs becouse Bizantynes first met them when they were mercenaries of the Onoghur allience. This is why they named them Ongri. In reality hungarians never called themselves anything like that.
There was also Finnic tribes in Chuvashia. I am Finn and my great great great grand father was born in Chuvashia
excellent that you know your root
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30]
The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria
Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’)
A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820
Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’)
Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674
Utrigurs (Utighurs)
Oghur-Bulghar Turkic group, located south-east of the Don River, near the Sea of Azov, and traditional enemies of the related ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-4918
Bolgar, Tatarstan/Russia (Bulgar, Bulgar al-Cadid, Kuybyshev)
By the 15th century it was known as Bulgar al-Cadid ‘New Bulgar’ after the Turkic-speaking Volga Bulgars.
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191905636.001.0001/acref-9780191905636-e-8397
Bulgars, Turkic,
also Proto-Bulgarians, Pra-Bulgarians, a pastoral people, originally living in Central Asia. Swept westward in the great movement of steppe peoples ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-0850
Kuvrat
(Κοβρα̑τος, according to Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica 2:161f), khan of the Onogur Bulgars; died after 642. Patr. Nikephoros I mentions his revolt against the Avars and alliance with Herakleios; Kuvrat was granted ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100045529
Kubrat , of the royal Duloclan, ‘lord of the Ononghundur-Bulgars and Kotrags [Kutrigurs?]’
www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Dulo+clan&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true
The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River.
academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/10/2220/963437
Chuvash is the sole living representative of the Bulgharic branch, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family.
oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001/oso-9780198804628-chapter-28
Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century.
www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I
The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations.
www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4CBA0E2CB74C8093EC1CA38C95067D55/S2513843X20000183a_hi.pdf/_div_class__title__Early_nomads_of_the_Eastern_Steppe_and_their_tentative_connections_in_the_West__div_.pdf
In the Hunno-Bulgarian languages /r/ within a consonantic cluster
tends to disappear
projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf
An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible.
academic.oup.com/jole/article-pdf/5/1/39/32972809/lzz010.pdf
The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.”
books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press)
Turkish tribes who founded a kingdom (9th-12th century) in the region between the Volga and the Kama.
www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/divers/Bulgares_de_la_Volga_et_de_la_Kama/110545
The Bulgars,,Turkish people who were formed on the Don.
www.universalis.fr/recherche/l/1/napp/23625
Although the Bulgars were originally a Turkic-speaking people from Asia, they merged with the Slavic tribes whom they conquered in the 7th cent.
www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/arts/language/linguistics/bulgarian-language
The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion.
www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea.
www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states
Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century.
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
Turkic is name not for ethnical origin but language. I understand that there are some Turkish dreaming to unify all Muslims in Russia and the region against Russia, but that wont happen. Repeating that Bulgars have turkic descent doesn't mean that they have cultural or ethnic origin with turks.
@@0xe849
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28]
An ethnolinguistic group (or ethno-linguistic group) is a group that is unified by both a common ethnicity and language. So we can say Turkic is one ethnicity just like German,French,Albanian,Bulgarian or Circassian.
Chuvash women,very good women!!!
Song ,perfekct and women mix .........
I don't think they are %100 real mongolid - turkic people.But they don't look like slavic.At least most of this chuvashes have got more asian eyes than todays anatolian - turkish people.I am from Turkey.
+Murat Kuran Even the Proto-Altaics began as mixed Eurasians. Today some Turks are white, some are yellow, some are a mixture. But they are all equally Turkic.
Хватит трепаться. Все просрано. Допели сь.,доплясались, домолились и т,д учите кит.яз.
@HunHorda
Danube Bulgars are coming from Itil (Volga) who are now chuvash. Mixed of some ogur and hunnic tribes. ("BULGAR" means "MIXED" in old Turkish. Even now we use the verb "bula-mak" in modern Turkish.
When they relocate to Danube, took some slavic tribes (and illiric, I think) into them rule, with turkics.
While the turkics are weakening, orthodox christianity and Slavic language became dominant.
Yes, early Turkic
Bulgarians are not turks !
Who are we Bulgarians. Where is our homeland? What are our origins? The answers to these questions are lost in the distant past despite many theories and assumptions about our roots. One thing is certain - our ancestors lived in the lands of ancient Asia. It remains to be seen from what part of Asia exactly they came to Europe. In scientific circles the thesis on the Persian origins is finding more and more followers. These days, a Bulgarian scientific expedition has left for Iran in search of our roots.
Scientists are unanimous and believe that the Bulgarians today represent a genetic cocktail of different tribes and peoples who once lived in our territories for a shorter or longer time. The proof - there is no such thing as a definite type of Bulgarian - he could very well be brown or blond, with blue or brown eyes, tall and slender or short and stocky, etc. The Slavs, Thracians and Protobulgarians are obviously those who left the most important traces in the genetic profile of Bulgarians today.The researchers of the great scientific expedition are however convinced that in our veins the Protobulgare blood dominates and that our ancestors did not come from North Siberia as was believed for a long time, but from the territories of Iran and the Pamir massif. . If scientists can find any evidence for this hypothesis, the Bulgarians' version of Slavic identity will be denied. "In the days of socialism we were 'brothers' with the Russians and that is why our Slavic genes had to dominate. But in truth most Bulgarians do not have the characteristic features of Slavs and when they go to Russia they are asked which ex-Soviet republic they come from ”, explains Alexander Iliev, scientist of the expedition and director. scene from the documentary trilogy on the origins of the Bulgarians broadcast by Bulgarian National Television. This researcher believes that there are undeniable facts which prove the hypothesis of our Persian roots. As, for example, the bas-relief of the knight "Rag e modar", discovered in Afghanistan, bas-relief which in fact is at the origin of the bas-relief of the Knight of Madara near the town of Chumene in northern Bulgaria , dating from the 8th century. It is believed that the word "madar" originates from the word "modar" and is related to the worship of the god Mitra, who for his part is of Iranian origin. Monuments similar to the Knight of Madara have been found in Iran. Linguists, for their part, have discovered that in the Farsi language there are some 800 identical words with the Bulgarian language, some of these words having been adopted by the Bulgarian language via Arabic or Turkish. Let's not talk about the similarities in customs, religious beliefs, cultural traditions. And even :
“The curious coincidences are mainly in sciences like genetics, for example, explains Alexander Iliev. We managed to develop a non-representative sample of 58 DNA tests at Pamir which proved a great similarity between our peoples. Research on the anthropology of modern Bulgarian on the other hand shows 40% of coincidences with our distant ancestors of the Pamirs and Afghanistan. We are probably, therefore, part of this great Persian civilization! "
Members of the expedition will search Iran for almost a month of libraries and archives, have talks with historians and scholars to gather enough evidence for their hypothesis about our Persian origins. In fact, this is not the first such expedition. Alexander Iliev asserts that all the research so far leads to the following conclusion:
“Our information, which coincides moreover with that of many historians of this period, indicates that approximately 150 years after Christ begins the great emigration of the populations of the north of Afghanistan and the south of Tajikistan, emigration caused by the invasion of the "white" Huns, as they are called. After bloody battles, the Bulgarians, along with other peoples, left these regions and settled in the Caucasus. From that moment the history of our people is known. The Bulgarians stay in the Caucasus, build their cities there, etc. Historic Greater Bulgaria was formed during the time of Khan Koubrat, while his son, Asparouh, was the one who brought the Bulgarians to the territories it occupies today and it is he who is the founder of the First Bulgarian State . ";
where is this from?! i wanna go there :( its soooo beautiful culture
Russia
These have a lot of Scythian ancestry!
Bullshit 😂😂😂
@@ramsesramses3857 cope lmao
@@ramsesramses3857 Slavs and Iranians have Scythian ancestors or what ???🤣🤣
Because Scythians are Turkic
Thanks Sis!Among Ogurs before Bulga Ogurs,there were tribe Sary Ogurs,wich mean silver,white Ogurs.I think they are at least partly grandfathers of chuvash people ...
Bulgarians are not turks !
Who are we Bulgarians. Where is our homeland? What are our origins? The answers to these questions are lost in the distant past despite many theories and assumptions about our roots. One thing is certain - our ancestors lived in the lands of ancient Asia. It remains to be seen from what part of Asia exactly they came to Europe. In scientific circles the thesis on the Persian origins is finding more and more followers. These days, a Bulgarian scientific expedition has left for Iran in search of our roots.
Scientists are unanimous and believe that the Bulgarians today represent a genetic cocktail of different tribes and peoples who once lived in our territories for a shorter or longer time. The proof - there is no such thing as a definite type of Bulgarian - he could very well be brown or blond, with blue or brown eyes, tall and slender or short and stocky, etc. The Slavs, Thracians and Protobulgarians are obviously those who left the most important traces in the genetic profile of Bulgarians today.The researchers of the great scientific expedition are however convinced that in our veins the Protobulgare blood dominates and that our ancestors did not come from North Siberia as was believed for a long time, but from the territories of Iran and the Pamir massif. . If scientists can find any evidence for this hypothesis, the Bulgarians' version of Slavic identity will be denied. "In the days of socialism we were 'brothers' with the Russians and that is why our Slavic genes had to dominate. But in truth most Bulgarians do not have the characteristic features of Slavs and when they go to Russia they are asked which ex-Soviet republic they come from ”, explains Alexander Iliev, scientist of the expedition and director. scene from the documentary trilogy on the origins of the Bulgarians broadcast by Bulgarian National Television. This researcher believes that there are undeniable facts which prove the hypothesis of our Persian roots. As, for example, the bas-relief of the knight "Rag e modar", discovered in Afghanistan, bas-relief which in fact is at the origin of the bas-relief of the Knight of Madara near the town of Chumene in northern Bulgaria , dating from the 8th century. It is believed that the word "madar" originates from the word "modar" and is related to the worship of the god Mitra, who for his part is of Iranian origin. Monuments similar to the Knight of Madara have been found in Iran. Linguists, for their part, have discovered that in the Farsi language there are some 800 identical words with the Bulgarian language, some of these words having been adopted by the Bulgarian language via Arabic or Turkish. Let's not talk about the similarities in customs, religious beliefs, cultural traditions. And even :
“The curious coincidences are mainly in sciences like genetics, for example, explains Alexander Iliev. We managed to develop a non-representative sample of 58 DNA tests at Pamir which proved a great similarity between our peoples. Research on the anthropology of modern Bulgarian on the other hand shows 40% of coincidences with our distant ancestors of the Pamirs and Afghanistan. We are probably, therefore, part of this great Persian civilization! "
Members of the expedition will search Iran for almost a month of libraries and archives, have talks with historians and scholars to gather enough evidence for their hypothesis about our Persian origins. In fact, this is not the first such expedition. Alexander Iliev asserts that all the research so far leads to the following conclusion:
“Our information, which coincides moreover with that of many historians of this period, indicates that approximately 150 years after Christ begins the great emigration of the populations of the north of Afghanistan and the south of Tajikistan, emigration caused by the invasion of the "white" Huns, as they are called. After bloody battles, the Bulgarians, along with other peoples, left these regions and settled in the Caucasus. From that moment the history of our people is known. The Bulgarians stay in the Caucasus, build their cities there, etc. Historic Greater Bulgaria was formed during the time of Khan Koubrat, while his son, Asparouh, was the one who brought the Bulgarians to the territories it occupies today and it is he who is the founder of the First Bulgarian State . ".
Сары слово с чувашского означает светлый вообще-то, а Сара по смыслу жёлтый означает в прямом понимании.
Chuvash are Turkic ethnic group ;en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuvash_people
It’s ethnicity, not «ethnic group».
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars.
The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people.
Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
Mihail Nikoloff dumb f*😂😂😂
"Ilk Türkceden" türeyen iki dialekt/lehce vardir. Bunlarin ikiside Türk dili olmakla birlikte, bir kolu "ana Türkce" diger kolu ise "ana Bulgarca" diye adlandirilir. Ilk Türkceden bütün Türk dilleri gelismistir. Ana Bulgarcadan 3 dialekt/lehce türemistir: 1)Tuna/Donau/Danubian Bulgarcasi 2.)Kuban Bulgarcasi ve 3.) Volga Bulgarcasi. Volga Bulgarcasindan bilgidimiz Türk dili olan "Chuvash"ca gelismisir. Ana Türkceden ise bu gün bütün diger Türkdiller türemistir.
Дагодухаш! 7хиляди години преди да измислят’турция’ я е имало България и се е говорило на Български из цяла днешна Русия, това е обединяващият език на руската държава. А съвременна Турция е създадена от родопския Българин ‘Ататюрк’за да ви извади от Средновековието и да ви направи нормални хора. Защото до Анкара всички сте Българи.
BULGAR,AVAR,HAZAR,KABAR,SADAGAR,SUVAR,GUJAR,AVSHAR............................................ETC.................................................................. ALL ARE TURKS..............................DESCENDANTS OF HUNS...................................
Българите никога не са били тюрки
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30]
The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria
Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’)
A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820
Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century.
www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I
The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.”
books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press)
The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion.
www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea.
www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states
Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century.
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941
www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages
xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars
bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1
Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia.
The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press.
Cambridge University Press
books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false
Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5
hizliresim.com/stAHqu
More Sources
1drv.ms/w/s!ArU3juYblIHghhn2C4hh-bLC8FRi
Turkic is name not for ethnical origin but language. I understand that there are some Turkish dreaming to unify all Muslims in Russia and the region against Russia, but that wont happen. Repeating that Bulgars have turkic descent doesn't mean that they have cultural or ethnic origin with turks.
@@0xe849
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28]
An ethnolinguistic group (or ethno-linguistic group) is a group that is unified by both a common ethnicity and language. So we can say Turkic is one ethnicity just like German,French,Albanian,Bulgarian or Circassian.
@@papazataklaattiranimam , you are funny do you know? :) You don't even know the difference between ethnical and language origin. By your words the Australians have the same ethnical as the Amerikans and Britains, and the Brazilians with the Portugueses etc. etc.
@@0xe849 these groups you mentioned are not ethno-linguistic groups😂😂
@@papazataklaattiranimam , and what are they? :) And what makes them different than groups that you give.
България означава - Божествен Народ!
+Youlian Doytchinov, Пăлхар - означает восставший или Народ Непокоренный, как и Чуваши
Greeting to our Volga Bulgar (Chuvash, Tatar) brothers - from Danube Bulgaria.
Danube Bulgarians are a South Slavic nation and not Turkic speaking like the Chuvash Bulgars.
ıYı - На Бога се уповаваме! In God we trust... Това е стар български символ, с хилядолетна приемственост, 5 - 6 хилядолетия пр. Хр., слагал се е най-вече на крепостни стени, щитове, шлемове и мечове... както и на талисмани. На маговата звезда или Розетата от Плиска и на много други места по цяла България.
ıYı
It's also the symbol (tamga in Turkic) of Kayı clan. Who are Kayı people? They are Ottomans.
www.google.com.tr/search?q=tamgalar+ve+t%C3%BCrk+boylar%C4%B1&rlz=1C1HLDY_trTR792TR792&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjh2cqj2ufdAhXrB8AKHcALD3IQ_AUIDigB&biw=1366&bih=626#imgrc=_
Here, different Oghuz Turkic tribe tamgas.
Текст песни пожалуйста напишите кто-нибудь?Мне очень песенка эта нравится!Заранее спасибо СИРЕ манран!
But not like bulgarians... Old bulgars are turkic
+Ebuzer .Yılmaz Right!
+Ebuzer .Yılmaz
Old Bulgars are not turkic, they are Uralic. Chuvash have a language mixed with Tatar (a Turkic people) because for centuries, the Tatars ruled over us, but before that, as far from 500-1150 the territories of the Volga were populated by 'Old Bulgars', who were not Turkic. The reason they moved first to the Black Sea where they formed Khazaria, and another group further to Romania and today's Bulgaria, is mainly because Turkic tribes kept coming in from Asia, attacking their settlements and stealing cattle, causing hunger. I don't want to offend anyone, but that is just history I learned from my grandparents on Chuvash's.
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars.
The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people.
Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
wrong. the tatars were mongols. they subdued the volga bolgars, the cumans and other turkic people in the 13th century and the name just stuck with the wider turkic population. todays kazan tatars are in fact volga bolgar descendants. they speak turkic like their ancestors. they also spoke turkic before the tatars overrun them in 1236. how do we know that. well it wasn't the mongol tatars who brought the turkic language to the volga bolgars. the volga bolgars turkic language is documented in historical data centuries ago. lol
kapgan And, somehow mysteriously, the name of the country which he was the ruler was the gooood
"Old Great Bulgaria "👍
NO old great tatarstania
NO old great tourkia
NO old great turkmenistania
NO old great oghuzstania
NO old great ogurstania
NO old great Bulgarian k(h)aganat or any kind of
-- stan "
Just a good proud "Old Great Bulgaria" with the the ruler named Kaisar/Kessarr/Caesar Kubrat!👍
And you keep reading Wikipedia 🙊🤥😂😂😂
дать бы в глаз автору, нихрена не знает про то, кто такие чуваши! мы не тюрки и не относимся к тюркоязычным группам, наш язык вообще считается обособленным и исторически не видоизменившимся со времён волжской булгарии!!! какие тюрки когда их тут даже и не было близко!!!
I am very happy that the Huns came through it all and found a lovely home in the Urals. I hope some day Chuvashia will be independent. In the old days Attila was the most important man in the world.
over the dead body of the Rus'. they are doing fine as it is in the RF don't you think?
There are 2 general mistakes here. 1st - Chuvash people are mixture of central european & mediterranean stock-(DNA analysis) The fact they speak turkic is irrelevant. They are strongly influenced from Volga Bulgaria (their folklore costumes & embroideries are bulgarian). 2nd mistake - Bulgarians are of Iranian stock (DNA analysis), not turkic. fyi there is no difference between Bulgar & Bulgarian. Don't get confused by wiki articles-thats not serious studies..
No no, chuvash national this is clear BULGAR people... old country Volzhskaya Bulgaria. Now time country Bulgaria this is mix slovanian people and bulgar people
+Виктор Мельников Yes, well put.
@Accelerated "The Slavs under name of the Antes and the Sclaveni first appear in Byzantine records in the early 6th century."
Lipoksai is prominent in the Iranian mythology as Athrosiab and a son of Tur, closely paralleling the Herodotus' descent of Lipoksai from Targitai. The Türkic legends continue the epic line of the Herodotus' myths, affording Lipoksai and Arpoksai a position of the Alps, while the youngest Koloksai is given a deified position. Ref. Z.Gasanov "Royal Scythians", p. 204-209, 272).
Herodotus IV 5, 6, M.I. Artamonov, History of the Scythians in Soviet science, VDI, 1947, No 3.
tigin bey.... Bulgars IS NOT of TURKİC origin! ;)
Bulgars are old Turkic origin but then, they are mixed the Slavs. All historical sources says that.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuvash_people
Bilal Yıldırım wikipedia isnt always right
OlFexMaGe Yes I know. I've read a lot of books about the Bulgarians. They are not Turkics now but their progeny are based on the Turkic race.
OlFexMaGe But absolutely Chuvash are Turkics
4/
Yakuts are not pure mongoloids, they're Eurasians. Yakuts might look almost completely mongoloid to the untrained eye but so do Bashkirs that are 95% paternally Caucasian (mostly Europid).
It's the exact same thing with Yakuts; the mtDNA of Yakuts is almost purely mongoloid represented by the haplogroups D, C, B and G which are all purely mongoloid maternal haplogroups.
In conclusion, Yakuts are a mixture of Indo-European male that knock up mongolo-Siberian females.
Solahmir Haka y and mtdna ancestor don't mean much.
Descendants of Huns*
+Friedrich Kass "Chuvash are a Finno-Ugric tribes Turkicized in language!" I also made this presumption myself, but I have no proof. Have you any proof?
+Attila Vandra It has been scientifically proved! They were Mari tribe originally, but mixed with Sabirs and Khazars! The Kazan-Tatars call them with that ethnonym, obviously they know them in past, who they were!
+Friedrich Kass Can you give me a link? (Maybe in English or a latin letter writing language... (I do not read Cyrillic...)
"The Kazan-Tatars call them with that ethnonym" Which one? Mari?
+Attila Vandra You should search in webb, I only investigate with Huns and Xiongnu origin! Now, here is text about the Xianyun: "Their name has been identified not only with the Xiongnu, but also with the Cimmerians of the western source" !! Give this text in Google, and then you can see what I claim! The famous Byzantine historian and secretary of emperor Belizar, Prokopius from Cesare, properly claim that the original name of the Huns were Cimmerian ancient times! Huns are really Cimmerians, believe it or not!
***** I know - I am Chuvash.
Like every ethnic group on the Earth ,Chuvash people are result of mix of subethnics-antar,viryal and others...they poses genetic rooots from Bulgars,Sabars(Suvars),Fino-Ugrics and probably more.They were put to Ortodox religion by Ivan Terible .He used enourmos violence and cruelty upon them. Some very small percent of Chuvash still serve old pagan rituals...hope that help )
With my respects, nations don't about our genetics, our phenotypes. Yes, westerners generally think that way. But nations are about languages, traditions, not about our apperance. It's wrong also very disgusting idea.
Turkic Bulgars 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
Chuvashes are Huns of Today
The Chuvashs are the best-preserved Bulgars in the world, preserving the language, culture and religion.
Bulgars are earlier Huns.
Kisher
Bulgars and Huns are Oghur Turks according to world historians like harvard,oxford etc.
J85
He was from the Krum Dynasty,branch of Turk Dulo Clan
J85
It is bulgarian propaganda,bulgars are clearly turkic origin not others
They spoke only Turkic language
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgars
According to university and encyclopedia sources in Wikipedia including harvard,oxford,cambridge and many others
Also Bulgars are still Turkic peoples like Balkars,Volga Tatars and Chuvashes
J85
From Harvard page 354
Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World
Author: Glen Warren Bowersock, Peter Brown, Oleg Grabar
Bulgars
The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.”
books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false
The only surviving language from this linguistic group is believed to be Chuvash. Harvard Professor Omeljan Pritsak in his study "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan" (1982)[10] concluded that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the Hunnic languages, as he calls the Oghur languages.[11]
Their ancestors did come from Siberia and intermix with the local population (the Indo-Europeans) so to say they don't have "Mongoloid" in them is entirely un-true.
Chuvash itsTurkish people
+TUNC66 not turkish it s Turkic !
+VideoDk Turkish is the nationality of Turkey, Turkic is a whole bunch of different nationalities who all have a common origin with the Turks of Turkey. Turks are only one of the many Turkic peoples.
I think the distinction is necessary to avoid confusion.
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars.
The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people.
Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
bulgars are turkic and they have several branches. bulgarians on the other hand are a slavic people with no connection bulgar, chuvash or any other turkic people. the last remnants of turkic bulgars in thrace and danube died 1000 years ago and completely assimilated into the local slavic population.
Some of the Chivas girls are quite pretty,God blessvthem.
I mean Chuvash girls.
It thought you were talking about the whisky 😂
@hunnoturk the spelling is Sino-Tibetan, and secondly Chuvash people are FAR from the Sino-Tibetan group. East Asians belong to that group.
Надож, девушка в центре на 0.48 моя родственница. Не ожидал её здесь увидеть. Привет из Чебоксар...
@hunnoturk haplogroup Q has been found in approximately 4% of Southern Altaians and 32% of Northern Altaians.[12] It is found in 16% of Tuvans.
The frequency of Q in northern China is about 4%, with many Chinese samples of haplogroup Q belonging to the subclade Q-M120.[15][16] Haplogroup Q is found in approximately 3% of males in Tibet and Mongolia. It is also found in 3% of Uyghurs.
Very low marker for "Sino-Tibetans", however if you said same as Native Americans, then I'd agree.
Hungarians are of course uralic.
Indeed, I've read so in many sources. You're uralic and adopted customs from other people, such as huns and bulgars, onogurs, khazars and kabars.
Of course, not suggesting that you were linguistically related to them.
You speak magyar, an ugric language, while the huns, onogurs and etc. spoke Lir-turkic, significantly different from eachother.
Dude, you should learn more about those people:
'One is that they originated from a mixing between the Turkic Suar and Sabir tribes of Volga Bulgaria with local Mari tribes and also the Finno-Ugrian[13] population of the Volga Basin. '
You've left incorrect comment
I don't know if the bulgarian language is slavic or not (for me it has much slavic in it), but the faces I see in the movie are similar to our bulgarian faces in Bulgaria.
They Chuvash Bulgars and Danube Bulgarians are two different ethnic groups that speak totally different languages.
@@markiec8914he’s trying to say there are Russian loan words in the Chuvash language
also russians say "nas" like bulgarians, whereas spanish say "nos".
"datj" "daj" is the same in Russian and bulgarian, in Spanish it's dar, also a bit similar because slavic and latin languages are related somehow, both are indoeuropean. in italian it's dare...
"probi" is also the same as in Russian, from "probavatj". "pasti" also exists in Russian,
I know Spanish and some Bulgarian and I have yet to see the first word which is similar to Spanish(except "luna" , moon, which is also the same in Russian). A lot of words in Bulgarian are very similar to Russian.
chuvashs are tatar-turks,like the bulgars,but most of them think,they are slavic. chuvash is a turkic language, they are the only remnant of the R turkic branch,the other spoken turkish dialects are all Z dialects... u can still find R turkish in hungarian,sumerian,bulgarian if u compare the old languages.
No kidding man? And are they Turkic, or Iranian?
@gorobei1227
I don't understand your English, but I think you mean that "Andrey Lyzlov" was not working so good, isn't it ?
Cuvas Turklere sevgiler. Ne giydigimiz nasil yasadigimiz degil ne konustugumuz onemli. Biz Turkiz vatanimiz Dunya.
The grave of the one of the 5 brothers - Alcek IS FOUND in Italy and they recognized him as SCULLS FROM IRANIC ETHINIC GROUP. In his grave he is with his horse which only the proto-Bulgarians used. ;)
Beutifull turkic origin people unfortunatly they are so assimilated with russian so they are not much turkic today as their ances they are so russified but one day we will retake this lands and we will turkify them again today russian girls are so love in turkish mam we will turkify russians too we are so strong country with strong population
that's right, but spanish and bulgarian don't understand eachother as well. Bulgarians and Russians understand a great deal of eachother. And Russian is not only based on old slavonic but equally on eastern slav languages. Ukrainians and Bulgarian also understand many words.
Ancient Turkic sounds like bulgars-hazars branch, the oldest one, which was used by huns. The only language ramained from this branch is chuvash. It has no similarity to slavic languages at all. At all I said. Civilizers of east slavs were greeks from byzantine, not bulgars. So you missed here. I understand bulgarian a lot from russian. Modern bulgarians are descendants from north caucasus bulgars (khan asparukh) and slavs.
Bulgars - Southern Huns. Known in Chinese annals with 216 the year. Lived at that time in Shanxi, China. The name means "Five tribes". Etymology output only in the Chuvash language (R-L- type, archaic language).
Later in Sogdiane mixed with Yueh-chi. Titles "Baltavar", the "Savan" in the Volga Bulgaria (922 years, in the manuscript of Ibn Fadlan) proihodit of Sogdiana.
Chuvash - also from the language of the Yueh-chi. This clan name. "Chobach" - "the shadow, protection of the king"
ALLAH bless you all the turk people...greating from turkey
The Chuvash language belongs to the Turkic language family, but it's so distintict from other Turkic languages that it's rather classified (together with some other extinct languages of this branch) as a Bulgaric (or Oghur) language as opposed to Turkic proper. There is also no evidence that the ancestors of Chuvash people ever called themselves Turks.
some races identifed by DNA alike Aryans, however Turks assymulated many Indo European people, and those assymulated one consider them as Turkic This makes Turkic more complicated and make it only can be identified by the idiology rather than blood.
Very nice sound. What is the name of the song and who is the singer?
Blagodaram za vid!
Tengrian deity Umai. The Greek analogue Gea is a primowomb, a grandmother of Zeus; so is Scythian Api and Türkic Umai (OTD 611). Umai cognates are “umai” = womb, “um” = stomach, “uma” = mama. Other Tr. cognates are “api/abi/aby/avy/apa/abba/aba/apai” = respectively mama/senior sister/mother's sister/father's senior sister/father's mother/appellation “madam“/husband's sister/woman. Semantically, Api is an apogee of motherhood and womanhood. For Iranian etymology,
Я, Чуваш, Всему Человечеству объясняю, астрономам, астрологам, Вселенная не имеет границ.. Несмотря на Астронам Всего Мира. Это я увидел еще в детстве
@PlevenNikopolTURKi, the proto-bulgars are from balkh, that is - iranian. bulgars mixed with other people from further east in later times and thus turkicized but their root is iranian. in bulgarian you can find many turkic words, however, there are as many words, which do not exist in turkic, as they are iranian. for example, how can you explain with turkic origin of the following macedonian bulgarian names - balshi, korcha, devol, chargan (grevena), struga, ohrid, prespa, prilep, vardar (var)?
no dear, you are wrong, Turk is the name for all people who have TurkIC identity..People of Turkey called Turks of Turkey, people of Chuvashia are called Turks of Chuvashia and your language is Chuvashian Turkic.
Regards, Loves and Respects from Azerbaijan
The Bulgarians are Turks but they do not come from the Oguz branch like the Anatolian Turks. Like the Indo-Europeans who divided into several branches (Germanic, Celtic, Italic, Slavs, Greek, Illyric, Indo/Aryan, Anatolian) the Turks also divided into several branches. Except that their divisions are much more recent and therefore their languages are still more or less understandable between them. Concerning the Bulgares Turks, part of these Bulgarians migrated to present-day Bulgaria where they mixed with the Slavs and were culturally and ethnically Slavized so that the Bulgarians as Turkic tribes only the name remained.The bulgarians who immigrated north towards the Volga. They also ended up creating a Bulgarian state with Bolgore as its capital. These Bulgarian Turks remained Turkish and continued to speak their Bulgarian Turkish language. They adopted Islam. Then arrived the Mongols, the latter had incorporated into their troops numbers of Turcs tribes who had remained in Mongolia and whom the Mongols had defeated. One of these Turkic tribes was called Tatars. These Tatars were at the forefront of the Mongol troops. The Turkish-Muslim Tatars in the service of the Mongols subjugate the Muslim Turkish Bulgarians of the Volga. Over time, the Volga Bulgarians abandoned the Bulgarian version of the Turkish language and adopted the Tatar version of the Turkish language. The Turkish Bulgarians then became Turkish Tatars. The Chuvash come from these Bulgarian Turks who mixed with Indo-Iranian tribes like the Scythians but also Finno-Ugric tribes and Slavs. The Chuvash remained pagans for a long time then they became Muslims and it was in the 19th century that they converted to Russian Orthodoxy.
It must be remembered that the Turks left Mongolia and made Central Asia their country except that when they arrived in Central Asia this region was populated by Iranian peoples who were Turkized. Subsequently these "modified" Turks continued their routes either towards the south-south/west (the Oguz branch of the Seljuks) or towards the north-north/west towards the Volga, the Ukrainian plains where they continued to mix with Iranian tribes (Sarmatian Alans, all descendants of the Scythians) either Finno-Ugric (Ural region) or to a lesser extent with Slavs. Thus the properly Turkish race does not exist. You are considered Turkish if your father is Turkish.
@dimylen Я горжусь твоей смелостью и благодарю тот Университет, в котором учился или будешь учиться. Вперед! С Завязанными глазами! Твой дедушка Ося