Comparison between these two Vlog profiles. No color grading, only exposure match and CST from Vlog to rec709 at the end. Match LUT here: drive.google.c...
Ahh I see what you mean by the look of the 8 bit at night in V-LOG. I noticed you really had to push the ISO too. I was hoping it was only 1250-1600 ISO but dang 6400 is really high. I also see the magenta cast of skin tones. I read that Cine-D is solid at night but less dynamic range and skin tones can begin to look "unhealthy". The V-LOG to S5 LUT is pretty good at matching. In your other video did you denoise it with just your choice of editing software or was it NeatVideo? Thanks for this! Good luck on your future videos.
i think in GH5 is usable up to ISO 1600. sometimes i denoise sometimes not, depends, low light shots or drone shots i always denoise with resolve denoiser or with neat if image is terrible :)
Ahh I see what you mean by the look of the 8 bit at night in V-LOG. I noticed you really had to push the ISO too. I was hoping it was only 1250-1600 ISO but dang 6400 is really high. I also see the magenta cast of skin tones. I read that Cine-D is solid at night but less dynamic range and skin tones can begin to look "unhealthy". The V-LOG to S5 LUT is pretty good at matching. In your other video did you denoise it with just your choice of editing software or was it NeatVideo? Thanks for this! Good luck on your future videos.
i think in GH5 is usable up to ISO 1600. sometimes i denoise sometimes not, depends, low light shots or drone shots i always denoise with resolve denoiser or with neat if image is terrible :)