Thank you. I studied English in University and the way people describe grammar and linguistics concepts is often confusing even for me! I don’t know how I would ever “get” these concepts as a language learner. The way you explain things helps me teach, too!!! You’re awesome!
Thank you so much sir. This was very informative. I have a presentation in two weeks about ‘Language is descriptive not prescriptive’. Your video helped me a lot. Thank you. Salam Alykm from Libya, Arabia.
I think there should be a distinction between prescriptivism in grammar and precise language. Precision in language is often required academically as semantic dift can prevent people from understanding each other as they might just end up arguing semantics.
Thank you so much i have learnt a lot by only watching your videos! I love the way you explain, everything became more clear in my mind after i followed you💕💕
Thank you for the knowledge... would you mind sometime to do live streaming..🙂 Was wondering.. perhaps could help with topic contrasitive linguistic.. ☺
Hi Syamsu. I might be willing to do live streaming sometime--I haven't given it much thought, and I'm not sure how how many people might want to attend!
@@evanashworth490 Thank you for the response.. perhaps could do a voting before to do live streaming.. and ask us which topic most common can Evan guide us.. My friends.. from all the round countries.. would mind give the thought please💓
Sir, thank you so much for the video. It makes me happy when I search for a topic on youtube and find a video of you. I enjoy your classes a lot. Have a good day/night ♥
Hi Monta. That is an interesting observation. I suppose that BICS would involve children learning (or even acquiring) language more on their own, without the kind of assistance/instruction they would receive in CALP, so in that sense BICS would involve kids approaching language more descriptively (asking questions like, "how do speakers use ___ in language?"), while CALP, with its emphasis on academic instruction would be more prescriptive in its approach. I wouldn't equate BICS with descriptivism or CALP with prescriptivism, but, yes, I do think CALP would be more prescriptive.
That's actually a really difficult question to answer because, for example, laws or religion could be understood to "prescribe" human behavior, but that prescription is performed through language (in the form of, say, city statutes or religious texts). I guess I've never actually thought about this question before, but I'm really having a hard time coming up with an example of human understanding or behavior that is not prescribed using the vehicle of language.
One of my planned future videos will cover the history of linguistics as a discipline and will therefore address all of those topics. Sorry to make you wait!
These are so called "air quotes" or even "scare quotes", which nerds like me to use to indicate that the label (the thing in "air quotes") is somehow problematic. In this case, I was using the term "rules" in air quotes to indicate that grammatical rules in linguistics are often thought of in prescriptive terms (as inviolable), but in linguistics, "rules" (there's the air quotes again) merely refer to grammatical patterns that speakers of a language tend to follow (not that they HAVE TO follow them).
Can't some linguists be prescriptivist rather than descriptivist? It seems unlikely that preference doesn't exist in language and even the functionality of certain words or mechanics over others. Even if we are of the belief that a field is simply trying to understand a subject rather than make value judgments on it, we understand naturally that the value judgments come naturally from understanding--much like how historians may study history to learn first but to help society as well.
Linguists, by their very nature, are descriptive, as they only seek to describe how language(s) work(s)--and this is necessary in order to perform objective science (there is no such thing as a better/worse language than another language--as soon as a linguist starts believing that there are some language better than others in some sense, they have introduced bias into their study). However, as you recognize, every one of us--linguists included--recognize that prescriptivism exists (that there are "rules" for writing language, for example) and we all have our own language ideologies that dictate how we as individuals believe language should be used. So, think of it this way: I wear a "descriptive hat"when I work as a linguist in the field to document a lesser-known language, but I put on my "prescriptive hat" when I'm talking with friends about things that irk me about how people use English.
@@evanashworth490 Thanks for the reply! I only asked because it seems like understanding how languages arise and are used is intrinsically linked to preference. People use certain words because of their own preferences and I know linguists are human as well. I guess it seems similarly biased to hold that idea that all languages are equal. Certainly computer programmers don't share this perspective! Again, thanks for your reply and thanks for the video!
The way he explains makes you feel calm and know it is really not difficult
In online class, lessons are always self-paced. Thank you for being my mentor!!
Right here with u lol
I enjoyed listening to you mini lectures. You always explain things so clearly!
Evan you're the greatest teacher I have ever had! Thanks for all the videos!
Thanks for your Brevity in sharing this topic. Actually it's our topic this afternoon and now it's really clear now to me the difference between two!
Thank you. I studied English in University and the way people describe grammar and linguistics concepts is often confusing even for me! I don’t know how I would ever “get” these concepts as a language learner. The way you explain things helps me teach, too!!! You’re awesome!
Thank you so much sir. This was very informative. I have a presentation in two weeks about ‘Language is descriptive not prescriptive’. Your video helped me a lot. Thank you.
Salam Alykm from Libya, Arabia.
ı love this man he is the best. If it wouldnt him, ı would have never understood linguistics. thank you very much.
Thank you from Morocco.
It's very helpful.
I really understand the linguistics to a certain degree, which I never had.Thanks Evan.Please keep up the gud work
This is so helpful. Thank you for your video.
Your explanation was comprehensible.Thanks❤
My guy, You're opening new doors for me!
You are king. I can understand easily with your videos. Kralsın Kel Reis 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
I think there should be a distinction between prescriptivism in grammar and precise language. Precision in language is often required academically as semantic dift can prevent people from understanding each other as they might just end up arguing semantics.
Kindly make more videos on semantics and syntax!
Thank you so much i have learnt a lot by only watching your videos! I love the way you explain, everything became more clear in my mind after i followed you💕💕
Thanks for the video....hope many more to come
Thank you for explaining it clearly.
Great video!!! Thanks for sharing this one!!!😊😊😊😊😊
Thank you ❤️
Amazing video! Congratulations!
Excellent as usual. Thank you.
Thanks sir this was very helpful video lecture for me.
Thanks for your video, very clear as usual.
Thank you sir 🙏
It really helped to get a grasp over it !
Thank you for the knowledge... would you mind sometime to do live streaming..🙂
Was wondering.. perhaps could help with topic contrasitive linguistic.. ☺
Hi Syamsu. I might be willing to do live streaming sometime--I haven't given it much thought, and I'm not sure how how many people might want to attend!
@@evanashworth490
Thank you for the response.. perhaps could do a voting before to do live streaming.. and ask us which topic most common can Evan guide us..
My friends.. from all the round countries.. would mind give the thought please💓
@@evanashworth490 that would be amazing😍,I'd love to watch ur live streaming ❤️❤️
Thank you so much! This video helped me a lot.
Thank you so much❤
Thank you kind sir, yor are inspirantional
So helpful. Thank you soo much!
Thank u so much it's short but very informative
Indeed it was brief, informative and well-executed nontheless.
😘
thank you a lot !
Sir, thank you so much for the video. It makes me happy when I search for a topic on youtube and find a video of you. I enjoy your classes a lot.
Have a good day/night ♥
perfect explanation .. ❤
thank you so much sir.
Thank you :)
Instructor evan .can it be assumed that descrptive is associated with BICS. and prescriptive is associated with CALP ?
Hi Monta. That is an interesting observation. I suppose that BICS would involve children learning (or even acquiring) language more on their own, without the kind of assistance/instruction they would receive in CALP, so in that sense BICS would involve kids approaching language more descriptively (asking questions like, "how do speakers use ___ in language?"), while CALP, with its emphasis on academic instruction would be more prescriptive in its approach. I wouldn't equate BICS with descriptivism or CALP with prescriptivism, but, yes, I do think CALP would be more prescriptive.
Can you label something that isn’t directly related to language as prescriptive? If so, could you give an example?
That's actually a really difficult question to answer because, for example, laws or religion could be understood to "prescribe" human behavior, but that prescription is performed through language (in the form of, say, city statutes or religious texts). I guess I've never actually thought about this question before, but I'm really having a hard time coming up with an example of human understanding or behavior that is not prescribed using the vehicle of language.
A nice one.
Make videos on the following:
Universal grammar
Mentalism
Generitism
Behaviourism
One of my planned future videos will cover the history of linguistics as a discipline and will therefore address all of those topics. Sorry to make you wait!
Thanks
I wait your videos minute minute
well explained
Teacher, i need sameone to correct my writings could you please help with that
I'm sorry, I won't be able to help with that, so you might want to see out a writing/English tutor or even an editor.
😊😊👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
0:58 why we put our finger like that? i don't the reason
These are so called "air quotes" or even "scare quotes", which nerds like me to use to indicate that the label (the thing in "air quotes") is somehow problematic. In this case, I was using the term "rules" in air quotes to indicate that grammatical rules in linguistics are often thought of in prescriptive terms (as inviolable), but in linguistics, "rules" (there's the air quotes again) merely refer to grammatical patterns that speakers of a language tend to follow (not that they HAVE TO follow them).
Can't some linguists be prescriptivist rather than descriptivist? It seems unlikely that preference doesn't exist in language and even the functionality of certain words or mechanics over others.
Even if we are of the belief that a field is simply trying to understand a subject rather than make value judgments on it, we understand naturally that the value judgments come naturally from understanding--much like how historians may study history to learn first but to help society as well.
Linguists, by their very nature, are descriptive, as they only seek to describe how language(s) work(s)--and this is necessary in order to perform objective science (there is no such thing as a better/worse language than another language--as soon as a linguist starts believing that there are some language better than others in some sense, they have introduced bias into their study). However, as you recognize, every one of us--linguists included--recognize that prescriptivism exists (that there are "rules" for writing language, for example) and we all have our own language ideologies that dictate how we as individuals believe language should be used. So, think of it this way: I wear a "descriptive hat"when I work as a linguist in the field to document a lesser-known language, but I put on my "prescriptive hat" when I'm talking with friends about things that irk me about how people use English.
@@evanashworth490 Thanks for the reply! I only asked because it seems like understanding how languages arise and are used is intrinsically linked to preference. People use certain words because of their own preferences and I know linguists are human as well. I guess it seems similarly biased to hold that idea that all languages are equal. Certainly computer programmers don't share this perspective! Again, thanks for your reply and thanks for the video!