The Mighty Power of Nanomaterials: Crash Course Engineering #23

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ค. 2024
  • Just how small are nanomaterials? And what can we do with stuff that small? Today we’ll discuss some special properties of nanomaterials, how some can change at different sizes, and the difference between engineered nanomaterials and ones that occur naturally. We’ll also talk about some of the future research that’s needed on the use of nanomaterials.
    Crash Course Engineering is produced in association with PBS Digital Studios: • All PBS Digital Studio...
    Check out Deep Look: / @kqeddeeplook
    ***
    RESOURCES:
    www.safenano.org/knowledgebase...
    www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topi...
    ec.europa.eu/health/scientifi...
    www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/wha...
    www.britannica.com/technology...
    www.essentialchemicalindustry....
    www.britannica.com/technology...
    www.hwnanomaterial.com/nanomat...
    www.hindawi.com/journals/amse...
    www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/spe...
    www.zdnet.com/article/nanotec...
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
    news.mit.edu/2014/solid-nanopa...
    www.nanoscience.com/applicati...
    www.understandingnano.com/nano...
    newscenter.lbl.gov/2016/10/06/...
    www.theverge.com/circuitbreak...
    ***
    Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at / crashcourse
    Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever:
    Mark Brouwer, Kenneth F Penttinen, Trevin Beattie, Satya Ridhima Parvathaneni, Erika & Alexa Saur, Glenn Elliott, Justin Zingsheim, Jessica Wode, Eric Prestemon, Kathrin Benoit, Tom Trval, Jason Saslow, Nathan Taylor, Brian Thomas Gossett, Khaled El Shalakany, Indika Siriwardena, SR Foxley, Sam Ferguson, Yasenia Cruz, Eric Koslow, Caleb Weeks, D.A. Noe, Shawn Arnold, Malcolm Callis, Advait Shinde, William McGraw, Andrei Krishkevich, Rachel Bright, Mayumi Maeda, Kathy & Tim Philip, Jirat, Ian Dundore
    --
    Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook - / youtubecrashcourse
    Twitter - / thecrashcourse
    Tumblr - / thecrashcourse
    Support Crash Course on Patreon: / crashcourse
    CC Kids: / crashcoursekids

ความคิดเห็น • 102

  • @ediseverywhere
    @ediseverywhere 5 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    The animation team was on point this episode. :D

    • @MegaBaddog
      @MegaBaddog 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      they should get a beautiful narrator the next time

  • @TroyMira
    @TroyMira 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    What a lovely series you’ve produced here! Kudos.

  • @JuliaGreaven
    @JuliaGreaven 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I cannot wait to watch this episode!! Thank you Crash Course for your diligence over so many years!!

  • @PBDNR
    @PBDNR 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Hey an episode relevant to my lab work!

  • @BoykoDev
    @BoykoDev 5 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    It's not about the size of nanomaterials, it's how you use it!

    • @karenhandy3826
      @karenhandy3826 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm kinda thinking that's what this Covid-19 is....the nanos coming to wipe us out.....

  • @VEE727
    @VEE727 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love the soundtrack of all the series

  • @MrHavoc313
    @MrHavoc313 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love how they used Wilford Brimley character art to talk about diabeetus.

  • @camiloiribarren1450
    @camiloiribarren1450 5 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Gotta love learning about engineering, despite me not being anywhere near an engineer

  • @keenanorourke2927
    @keenanorourke2927 5 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    you guys need a math course please please in future

    • @eldersprig
      @eldersprig 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      they did statistics, and the calculus was discussed in passing in the physics one

    • @ethanpet113
      @ethanpet113 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Given how well they executed CS, I don't think that would be helpful.

    • @ciscobriano
      @ciscobriano 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      eldersprig if you see the calculus video please list it I can’t find it

    • @mariusmusicandscience
      @mariusmusicandscience 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just watch 3Blue1Brown!

  • @NickFarrow
    @NickFarrow 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kind of cool that the colors fallows the same scale as when metal is added to stained glass

  • @gauravagarwal9734
    @gauravagarwal9734 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    We know nerve cells can't be replaced so can we use nanocells to replace those nerve cells?

  • @anxietyinducing6601
    @anxietyinducing6601 5 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Nanomachines, son

    • @piciperkuadrik4636
      @piciperkuadrik4636 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The memes

    • @n.v.knovak3285
      @n.v.knovak3285 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was scrolling through their video list, saw the thumbnail "nanomaterials" and instantly clicked looking for this very comment😂😂....

  • @jackiedim7028
    @jackiedim7028 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    *"NANOMACHINES SON"*
    -Senator Armstrong

  • @AliHamza-ie7dg
    @AliHamza-ie7dg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Metal gear solid 4 references. Very nice 👌

  • @h.a178
    @h.a178 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PLEASE PLEASE A MATHS VERSION OF THIS CHANNEL IM IN NEED

  • @CindyFridayBeeman
    @CindyFridayBeeman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Our class wants to know: How can scientists work with things they cannot see? How do they place nanothings under a microscope?

  • @anthonybennett3494
    @anthonybennett3494 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can nanotube tech be used to build a strong, light weight, durable automobile frame replaceing steel or aluminum?

  • @rparl
    @rparl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Purple rain? Purple gold!

  • @JohnVance
    @JohnVance 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I enjoyed the Amiga cameo

  • @tyabmohammad6485
    @tyabmohammad6485 5 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    CrashCourse linguistics?

    • @TarkMcCoy
      @TarkMcCoy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Episode 1: Hold your tongue
      Wherein they explore how our bodies make sounds...well, at least from one end.

  • @ricuse7532
    @ricuse7532 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5:37 Nice Amiga 1000 there...

  • @FalbertForester
    @FalbertForester 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    1:45 Ms Frizzle!

    • @pnutz_2
      @pnutz_2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SEATBELTS EVERYONE!

    • @kayleedork6153
      @kayleedork6153 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not another field trip! Lol

  • @anthonywolf943
    @anthonywolf943 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nano materials that you ACCIDENTALLY make, looking at you Aluminum.

  • @tjs200
    @tjs200 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love that shirt

  • @Citelq
    @Citelq 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That animation of hitting the computer to reveal its contents is too similar to that one game where a person keeps punching its computer because its broken

  • @nfscsk
    @nfscsk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    graphene!!!

  • @dan1204hc
    @dan1204hc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can work and research nano materials following the career of Chemical or Mechanical Engineering.

  • @J_Delicious
    @J_Delicious ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you turn the power switch on and off with nanomaterials

  • @thespookylad7306
    @thespookylad7306 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If you cut something in half you make two things that are equally long

  • @cheblichebli8237
    @cheblichebli8237 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dont fool me ol chum

  • @baltakatei
    @baltakatei 5 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    "nanomaterial" ≠ "nanotechnology". "Atomically-precise manufacturing" more accurately matches what the public thinks "nanotechnology" means. But the term "nanotechnology" has become corrupted since research labs figured out including "nano" in their grant proposals improved their chances of getting funding. Source: K. Eric Drexler's "Radical Abundance".

    • @AdityaMehendale
      @AdityaMehendale 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      In addition to messing up nanomaterials and nanotech, the video doesn't actually spend significant time or effort explaining the "mighty power of nanomaterials". What powers? What materials? The only relevant tidbit I heard was that gold nanoparticles have vivid colors based on the particle-size. The rest is mostly hand-wavy pop-sci that may be discussed in polite conversation, but is utterly un-educational.

    • @imorokr
      @imorokr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They did mention the bit about surface area and its use as a catalyst. I thought it was pretty good, for the most part.

  • @justsayjay
    @justsayjay 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love her!

  • @clericneokun
    @clericneokun 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nanomachines, son!

  • @612Tiberius
    @612Tiberius 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That display case behind you was built by a frustrated Homer Simpson after six Flaming Moes, right?

  • @hoshang747
    @hoshang747 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sad no mention of colloidal silver n gold

  • @Dribbleondo
    @Dribbleondo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A weapon to surpass metal gear.

  • @Kryshma
    @Kryshma 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Scanning tunneling microscope and atomic force

  • @mohamedmagdy-xu2yu
    @mohamedmagdy-xu2yu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nano materials are promising but comes with a high cost I don't know what is the next step in material science would be but I think by 2021 we would have a yocto material 😂 😂 after all what we need is a material suitable for the application for a very low cost ( it won't matter if you have a sewing Needle made of titanium if plastic can get the job done with higher efficiency less cost )

  • @Hambxne
    @Hambxne 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where the heck do you get these shirts?? They are so fricken cool!

  • @alfkml
    @alfkml 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's what she said.

  • @twaamboshankoti3610
    @twaamboshankoti3610 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    21 minutes ago 700 views 😂🙌

  • @KGODSMACKC
    @KGODSMACKC 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Nanomachines?

  • @allthingsfascinating
    @allthingsfascinating 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That scotch tape graphene experiment was so coool

    • @yondaime500
      @yondaime500 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Though the way people talk about the experiment makes it sound way easier than it really is. Like you just stick scotch tape to a pencil and you get graphene. In reality, you need an extremely pure form of graphite, and you only get micrometer sized fragments of graphene lost in a sea of graphite and glue. You have to search for it using Atomic Force Microscopy, but it scans so slowly that you would never find it unless you narrow down the region where it might be.
      What Novoselov and Geim discovered was that if you transfer the graphite to a silicon wafer coated with 300nm of silicon dioxide, the single-layer graphene stands out under optical microscopy. If the SiO2 layer thickness is off by only a few nm, the graphene becomes invisible. That was the actual breakthrough. The scotch-tape technique itself (or micromechanical exfoliation) had been used for years on other materials (see the 1966 paper "Single Crystals of MoS2 Several Molecular Layers Thick", by R.F. Frindt for example), but nobody knew if it worked for graphene, or even if graphene actually existed at all.
      In any case, it was a great idea that allowed scientists to isolate graphene and study its properties (tens of thousands of papers on it have been published since), but it is anything but simple. That's why 14 years later we still don't have a way to mass produce graphene. But we're getting there.

    • @Ibogaman
      @Ibogaman 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yondaime500 There is a graphene jacket though, sounds legit. I think it came out a month ago?

  • @literaturelad9708
    @literaturelad9708 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would bang

  • @coreydevine3554
    @coreydevine3554 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    my brian just died

  • @Bunjamin27
    @Bunjamin27 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    ..Where's John Green? :/

  • @azertyQ
    @azertyQ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    this video is proof elon musk was just trying to be edgy with his "nano" comments

  • @lunalovegood858
    @lunalovegood858 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crash course do you know crash course KIDS?

  • @xstephanx94
    @xstephanx94 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    HAVE MY CHILDREN DAMNIT !!!!

  • @arelyrodriguez3980
    @arelyrodriguez3980 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nanoscale

  • @Katyayanibetha
    @Katyayanibetha 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wait - "Don't let fear of the unknown keep us from moving forward," is what you say when you're on an adventure, or trying to step out of your comfort zone. It's NOT meant to be applied to situations which could cause irreversible harm to people or the environment! You have GOT to be able to weigh the severity of consequences with your actions, and far too often people haven't done that - they used to dump nuclear waste into the ocean right off the east coast, for example. If something like this has the risk of possible harm, it should be tested in its entirety first before introducing it to people and the environment. Greed keeps people from doing what's necessary to protect people and the environment, and it sounds like this is another example. Greed makes people disregard potential destructive consequences and go forward anyway to find out the hard way. Humans are pretty smart - we could develop a new way of doing things if we wanted. It's only greed that prevents people from doing so. Gotta get those nano-materials to market, right? Sounded interesting until you revealed that no one knows how much harm they could cause. We have a responsibility to figure that out first when introducing man-made things into the environment.

  • @Ucceah
    @Ucceah 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    lol, my phone lasts 3-5 days, ans still 6-10h when running a CPU benchmark and using it as a handwarmer. (vernee thor plus)

  • @joebannon6920
    @joebannon6920 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I ❤️Dr. Somara!!!!

  • @hugoiwata
    @hugoiwata 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    She certainly doesn't look like a 1 meter high person

  • @kysier6015
    @kysier6015 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, I'm Wilford Brimley and I have Diabeetus.

  • @TamBryan1
    @TamBryan1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chemtrails need I say more

  • @pratik3780
    @pratik3780 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you maam
    Love from india 🇮🇳🇮🇳
    😘😘😘

  • @Languslangus
    @Languslangus 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    💊

  • @ninishibby
    @ninishibby 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been watching this series over the past few weeks and the host has seemed a bit off to me I just couldn't pinpoint why. But I believe I've figured it out: the intervals between her blinking are oddly long. Just something I've noticed.

  • @Umirua
    @Umirua 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crash Course Mathematics

  • @unleashingpotential-psycho9433
    @unleashingpotential-psycho9433 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nanomaterials Is going to change our every day lives in the future.

  • @flamephlegm
    @flamephlegm 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    She has a cool top.

  • @Turyesh
    @Turyesh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Want to learn more uses of Nanomaterial? Watch Big Hero 6

  • @valdanowill
    @valdanowill 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I AM SURE SHE IS NOT TELLING THE TRUTH THAT SMALLER IS BETTER. HAHAHA

  • @Turyesh
    @Turyesh 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Physics?

  • @whitemoonaj9036
    @whitemoonaj9036 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ooooo first

  • @michalchik
    @michalchik 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Even my high school students get bored watching her

  • @8015908
    @8015908 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    My gawd this lady's voice sounds so sexy'intelligient.

  • @richt87
    @richt87 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Quit womensplaining

  • @libalmightygod8400
    @libalmightygod8400 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    british black people are so attractive,

    • @libalmightygod8400
      @libalmightygod8400 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I can listen her talking all day o.o

    • @bsinita_wokeone
      @bsinita_wokeone 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes she very smart also.
      But actually she British/southeastern asian more specifically she's Indian and English.
      I'm black american and I can tell the difference, ..........come on now how you not see that man.....

    • @libalmightygod8400
      @libalmightygod8400 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bsinita_wokeone right,paid too much attention of the lesson and her voice..

  • @danieldannydan1573
    @danieldannydan1573 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who is she I’m in like😅

  • @patdoc
    @patdoc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    can we get a host that doesn't speak broken english, and maybe have an interesting personality

    • @eaterdrinker000
      @eaterdrinker000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      She speaks the Queen's English! I know that basically sounds like Chinese to us 'Muricans.

    • @patdoc
      @patdoc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cuomotep the Reluctant Libertarian well America is the center of the universe and more people need to realize that

    • @n.v.knovak3285
      @n.v.knovak3285 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@patdoc 😂😂🤣🤣....

  • @michalchik
    @michalchik 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This narrator is terrible. This does not seem like a crash course at all. It feels like an introduction for kids. The information content is low and slow. I would say that it was probably the writer but I felt the same way about Crash Course physics. This narrator wasted so much time just with the stupid cute little asides and she talks way too slow.