OJ25 Episode 24 - The TRUE Story of the OJ Simpson Trial (Court TV Docuseries)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ม.ค. 2021
- #ojsimpsontrial #ojsimpson #philipvannatter #johnniecochran #nicolebrownsimpson #rongoldman #truecrime #courttv #OJ25
Closing arguments begin, but not before two Mafia hitmen testify on behalf of O.J. Simpson.
© 2020 Court TV Media LLC, part of The E.W. Scripps Company.
Ito should have been dismissed for allowing oj to "testify" without cross examination. Outrageous
"Juror Lon Cryer kept copious trial notes and a personal journal during the trial. Over 600 pages in all"
WE KNOW!!!!
Says who
😭😭😭
is that the first time it was ever mentioned
And still had the wool pulled over his eyes. Amazing, isn't it?
Just one Episode left 😞
You can watch the full trial. Will last 9 months if you watch all day so actually should last you a year plus! Seriously those are on TH-cam too
@@TammyM36how Long is it ? 100 plus hours?
Seems like OJ was the only person NOT on trial in this case.
That was the Defence’s strategy from the beginning since the evidence was so strong
What a coward. He wants to speak but can’t be cross examined
Why would he choose to be cross examined? So that this horrible prosecution team can question him about arguments and fights that all people in marriages go through? So they can paint him out to be this obsessed ex? OJ is smart and his defense team did one hell of a job pointing out the sloppy work in this case.
That's the law...
In an interview that is on TH-cam...He explains why his Lawyers refused him to take the stand,ALTHOUGH he dearly wanted too.
They said "The trial has gone on too long,and there is no telling how long you will be on that stand,and we might lose the Jury and there will be a miss trial"...At that point all he thought about were his kids...He has not seen them for over a year,and was told that another trial make take 1,2,3 or 4 years to prepare...So in essence...He would not see his kids for that amount of time as well.
What would you do as a Parent if you were in that situation?
Considering how he did in the Civil trial....can you blame him? The guy is a pathological liar.
@ent4u583 u don't have a choice! He's on trial! Or how u spelled trail! 😂😂😂
On this episode I quickly came to the conclusion I needed to start again from episode 1. I dunno how this jury came back that fast.
GOOD luck in starting all over again from episode One LOLOL
@@topfitnessssss I really can watch these over and over and enjoy it .
@@topfitnessssss 😭🤣
Watch the entire trial and you will see why the jury came back so fast
They came back so fast because they had already made their minds up before they even sat down in the jury box! They were Bias as hell! They did not consider the evidence I don't even think they were really listening to the evidence while it was being presented in the courtroom, they didn't look at those photos of that lady's face all bruised and battered! Most of the jurors saw a black man on trial and they thought, because the defense planted it in their heads, that he was framed for a crime that he didn't commit which was all bullshit! The man is guilty as heck!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lon Cryer was a Black panther member who gave the black power fist raise when he left the courtroom. that's all you need to know about his motivations...
you go boy!!
In fairness though, he explained in Episode 25 that he wasn't sending a message to anyone but Simpson. Telling him to make the best of his life.
I'm not sure that alone made him biased. The Black Panthers would have been highly disdainful of OJ Simpson, who was notorious for assimilating into the white corporate world and never looking back. The Black Panthers would have taken notice of something like that and they wouldn't have been in his fanclub.
First of all how do you know that he was a Black Panther member second is Lon cryer an American citizen? Did Lon cryer commit a crime in that court room?
That same juror today says “he probably did it”. Wtf
Van told Howard Sterns he knew J was a suspect, then the video was taken down when I reported it.
👹 *That was a VERY SERIOUS error by the judge to allow OJ to testify without cross-examination!* 👹 30:14
God bless Johnnie cochran...exposed soo much of the dirt in the police department!
The husband is always the suspect if it doesn’t make sense we the police will make it fit
Lon Cryer. Had his 'mind' made up before the murders...
For sure. All of them did
no nazi troll, he said he initially thought he was guilty.
@@TammyM36 no lying nazi troll, if you read the book the intial vote was 10 innocent and 2 guilty.
and im the king of pluto
Just when you think it can't get any worse, then gangster show up in defense of OJ Simpson........at this point you know this is courttv.
Let’s not forget the Menendez Bros. we’re locked up in the same holding cell as OJ.
All I know is this: The O.J. Simpson trial was a really crazy thing to happen in a really crazy time.... Rodney King, Jeffery Dahmer, Oklahoma City etc. our country ramped up in a way that none of us were prepared for and it's just gotten worse and worse. I believe all of us need to go back around this time and reassert a new look to give us a new perspective of what's happening now! I believe "and always have" that there are aspects we all missed about this time. Nothing was the same after this and a few other bizarre/crazy events in the first half of the 90's! The first World Trade Center bombing, The L.A. Riots, Ruby Ridge, Waco serious things this country hadn't seen in such a quick precession at least before or at least that's my opinion and my feelings about this.
I like your comment.
@@jeffmarlatt6538 Thanks. Unfortunately I believe we are heading to a unavoidable conflict with China take care Jeff times are soon going to test every human on earth. And I don't mean that in no religious sense or anything I'm just saying two nations with.......well I think you know where it more than likely will lead. ☢️
Rocky H yes indeed
you are observant but most people choose not to be because they rely heavily on the media to do that for them
And the menendez brothers to. Wel said
Ito cowered down
yeah he cowed down to the prosecution by preventing them from knowing about Furhman being unavailable and didn't allow the portion of the tapes where he talks about planting evidence to be played.
Imagine if Marcia "Karen" Clark and Chris Darden had to try cases like this every week in front of defendants who could afford more than court-appointed public defenders standing at their side instead of F Lee Bailey and Johnnie Cochran and Robert Shapiro. She and Chris would bumble through cases just like they did this one, angrily lashing out at the judge, the defendant, and the defendant's counsel. Racist cops would undermine their cases way more often. I'm glad this was televised so that America could see just how hard it is for a person of color to get a fair trial in America. Can you imagine trying to fight the machine that the state can afford to put together with nothing more than a fresh-out-of-school public defender? Remember: most of these cases don't even make it to trial, because underfunded and overmatched public defenders talk their clients into plea bargaining to a lesser charge every day in the US, and for good reason. If they go to court, the state has millions of dollars of resources and fancy crime labs and experts to parade in front of a jury, and the public defenders have nothing. This is just one more way that the government screws people who have no financial means in our country. Do you think that it is a coincidence? If they can keep you broke and just one foot away from incarceration, they can certainly keep you in line.
Absolutely correct: But the problem is the redefinition of racial epithets that came from this trial. Now liberals feel comfortable, because they can say N - word instead of the racial epithets that their ancestors created to continue to be used by main stream America even adding millions to a hip hop culture that's making millions by using the so called negros to disgrace his own heritage and get rich doing it. Who would have thought that the outcome would have been to make it easier for caucasian to say N- word rather then it's hostile meaning to describe Black African Americans and Native born Africans. Had OJ not has money to defend himself, they would have convicted him on a dog braking from a neighbor 60 yards away that he heard a dog barking around 10:15pm. That's something to think about.!!!
Imagine if Archie "the Cunt" 583 ....
Good observation. Well said.
Exactly. Because one man is fortunate enough to have the financial means to have a somewhat level field, it shows how incompetent the prosecution is. They have dozens of lawyers in the DA's office...and Marcia went 3 months without examining a witness. OJ doesn't have more resources than the state of CA
Starting right out of the gate with the ad hominem "Karen" reveals bias, distracts from the argument, and loses the decent reader.
30:15 here we go again: Judge Ito is bending to defense request as seen before, Simpson can make a speech but allow refuse to testify, so talking is okay but testifying not... requested by defense, objected by prosecution, Judge agrees to it ...
Ito complelty misses control of his courtroom...
except he didnt say anything in front of the Jury. so it had litterally no influence on the trials outcome. Also Ito ruled in favor of the procecution more often than not.
@@tobak952 except it was in front of the jury 30:32 he is even looking at them...
@@tfa8 31:12 "even though the jury didnt hear..." the Jury was not present. He was likely looking at the camera
he's ruled in favor of the prosecution several times lying nazi troll
There is only one takeaway from this trial…and that is Juror Lon Cryer kept copious trial notes and a personal journal during this trial. 🤷🏽♂️
Did he? I must have missed that part
When OJ25 continues!
Denise was clearly Lying 🤥
Although I believe OJ definitely did this, Vannatter really did bumble his way through this entire thing. He just kept putting his foot in it.
I don’t believe OJ did the killing, I believe his son Jason did it & Jason called OJ who came to the scene & then realizing he had to cover up for Jason. I could never understand how OJ who supposedly had cut his finger during the struggle but there was no corresponding cut in the leather glove. Even if one glove came off & that’s how his finger was cut while exposed I doubt OJ would have forgotten to leave w/out a knit cap (verified picture of Jason Simpson wearing before the murders) & one a glove he knew had come off. I think he came upon the scene & only realized upon getting there what happened & just happened to have the gloves in his Bronco. Also Jason Simpson had a pair of those same gloves given to him by Nicole as a present the same time she gave OJ his pair as a gift. Jason also had proven anger/assault issues w/his girlfriend as well and the fact he was a trained chef and Nicole cancelled last minute going to the restaurant he was working as the head chef that night. It makes a lot of sense. How would you be if you were humiliated in front of your work colleagues and boss by having your family bail on you. Either way OJ did it or he knows and is covering for someone who did and I doubt he’d ruin his life/career to cover for anyone other than a family member like his kid.
@ the dragon killer. I thought oh was guilty for 25 years. I followed the trial but mainly sensationalized talking heads on tv.
What you hear is what you believe as it was difficult to independently look at the evidence at the time.
It’s similar to the 4 years of media with the false narrative about trump Russia collusion. When you hear about it day in all day for 4 years. Then they make a small apology that they were wrong. People still believe there was substance to that story.
People believe whatever the media is telling them. Or just have massive bias and do not care about the facts.
@@johnreilly5600 It was not Jason. Fingerprints didn't match as William Dear dug in Jasons trash to get fingerprints off a bottle, Plus the cut finger is inconstant with the life and death struggle. Goldman put up a prolonged fight with a person or people. More than one person was present as multiple fingerprints are unmatched
@@johnreilly5600 yeah either him, Glen Rogers or Marvin Glass.
vannatter wasnt the only, or the biggest, screwup
Lon Cryer, like they say. "We hear what we want to hear." NO amount of evidence is going to cause this man to find OJ guilty.
But today he says “he probably did it”! Wtf
@@TammyM36 quiet troll
@@jadedheartsz go screw yourself. You’re the troll. I won’t be replying to any more of your comments but knock yourself commenting on mine!! Have it! Obviously you feel you have something to prove. Have a happy day!
@@TammyM36 The prosecution did a crappy job and the defense did an excellent job. He DID do it, but given the evidence and poor prosecution job in that exact courtroom, I don't know if I could have convicted him either....
@@CowSaysMooMoo I’m not going to argue your opinion and respect your viewpoint particularly where you know his guilt. However I don’t agree 100%. The prosecution definitely made some big errors but I’m not sure it would have mattered to this jury. I also feel the defense was very unethical on their proceedings. They did not give two sense about the truth.
I can understand why the jury got outta there so fast after the defense rested. They set the record for the longest sequester in CA history! They heard enough!
US History
Yes. Why wait when their minds were already made up. They were pissed off at the prosecution for their lack of professionalism I think. The defense opened so many holes in the prosecution's case. I agree with you. They had enough.
@@andrerobinson2923 no the initial vote was 10-2 and some jurors said they initially thought OJ did it until they defense presented their case
I woulda tried to get kicked off the jury on month 3
Julie Grant, DO NOT confuse CONFIDENCE with EGO
Vannatter made up his own terms - Potential Suspect, and Strong Suspect...
and he was 100% correct
Cochran got curse for this
So did kardashian
How do you figure?
no nazi troll
Ok. Now your God.
What the hell kinda thing is that to say? ...Vanatter also passed away...2012
Did Lon Cryer have notes on this case?
It’s hard to say if he kept copious notes
Why are they putting someone that is in witness protection on blast like that???
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 #CLASSIC
If the two former organized crime witnesses were referred to by the last name that they were known to have used while they were in the Mafia turning off the cameras wasn't going to protect them. In addition this was another attempt by the defense to draw attention away from OJs' history as physically abusive to Nicole, his history of stalking Nicole and his derogatory remarks of her appearance and manner of dress. The Defense did everything they could to draw attention away from the facts of OHs behavior as previously stated.
This is why proper documentation is so crucial for any police calls that come into dispatch. #whoisaware ❤️✌🏼✊🏽✍🏽😎
He may be guilty but if a detective planted blood on the socks I would vote not guilty why in the hell would you take a blood sample back to the crime scene to hand off to the criminalist that is insane
he's innocent
The big question is this;
Why would Lab move the blood sample from the Lab to OJ house that day ,!! This is big time mistake that they couldn’t explain
Jason simpson did it he cooked for fam nicole cancelled n he went he wore that hat in pics n was obsessed wit knives n dna was under nicoles fingertips ron had bruises on his knuckles OJ didnt have a mark
@@ChangingTides777 or how he couldn't explain how he cut his hand " & bled all over the place " at his house if u cut ur hand or any cut & bleed all over the night b4 ur gonna remember !
Not really, just a mistake. It takes nothing from the evidence which proves OJs guilt.
OJ should have been made to be cross examined after that ridiculous statement In open court!! Judge ito was AWFUL
18:25 at last ...a decent witness
Some witness. Just another enabler for Mark Fuhrman.
I do think OJ did it, but I can’t get over how at every turn these cops had an excuse for the mistakes they made it’s really their own hubris that was their downfall, not the jury
Philip vanaatter is such a maroon. He said the husband is always a suspect. And then he makes a stupid remark and said I never said that. He arrested oj.
WTf was the point of the Fiato Brothers other than to be able to say Mafia. Maybe I missed something but how were they relevant to the case in any way other than being able to bring Mafia into shit show of a case
Because they claimed that vannatter told them Simpson was a suspect from the get-go
And I couldn't figure out why is a police officer talking to two criminals in Witness Protection it doesn't make any sense
All of a sudden now money and fame is a problem since O.J. Simpson uses his to fight the injustice he faced. As to say “it’s not fair for him to use his resources his defense. Really, where they do that at.????
5:35 That's a false characterization - BOTH brothers CLEARLY SAID Vannatter WAS NOT BEING SARCASTIC.
They’re so focused on the defense and not focused enough on the case against the defendant.
because they had no case...there case was...glove, blood dna....but when we ask them hey when was the eviddnce collected umm we are not sure, why is there preservative in the blood...ummm we are not sure, did you move the bodies around ummm we are not sure....did you leave the bronco unattended for two month ummm we are not sure...but your honor blood blood blood.
Heard slap, what frame is that?
19 most logical person disregard for policy.
It is in everyone's interest that, in the event of a crime, the investigation is conducted correctly and with care for the evidence. This trial has exposed the incompetence and corruption within the justice system.
My mother might be watching
Stop allowing Fuhrman’s stinking self speak.
All he does is make excuses
@@TDKiller415 I have already answered so many of your troll post. At this point, you can refer to the other ones and know that the answers are all the same in all the posts.
@@QuatManlike oj when he was pounding on Nicole's face with his fists! I'm not a batterer !
She put it out as a woman being beaten. Testified
25:58 THERE WAS LITERALLY EVIDENCE SHOWING UP THAT WASN'T IN EARLIER PHOTOS AND VIDEOS...... What is he talking about????
Being 8 years old during this case and just hearing about it over time and OJ did it my whole life. And now mid 30s watching it for myself as much as I believe OJ did it and as much as I've seen he's talked about his kids and co parenting getting upset about Nicole giving oral to a man in the living room with the kids upstairs which any reasonable parent would be upset. If he did in fact do it why would he leave the kids upstairs with no supervision if he's been a concerned parent and interested in their well being. Me being a parent myself that is a huge ? Mark and concern.
Exactly. He would have never left that scene without knowing his kids were okay.
@@ent4u583 this whole case is mind boggling. Still trying to finish it, but whenever talking about the kids the very little they have in the trial both OJ and Nicole obviously love these kids to the fullest. Are they both parents of the year probably not, but cared enough to be there for their kids, go to their kids events, obviously being upset over a parent performing a sexual act I'd be pissed too I'd lay into my ex and take the kids out of that environment, home alone with kids at the other parents or grandparents then do it wherever you want.
These remarks about Nicole are so sexist - it's almost as if people are saying she deserved every awful that happened to her. OJ wasn't above beating the shit out of her - the mother of his children - while said children were in the same house. The guy she gave a blow job to wasn't some random pick up, he was a long term boyfriend. His name was Keith. It was about 1AM. Her children were asleep upstairs. The only reason anyone knows about it is because OJ was literally stalking her, peering through the window like a Peeping Tom. He was the one who screwed countless other women and did drugs, not her.
good question, one of many questions that those who think he is guilty needs to, but cannot answer
I think he's innocent as well
22:38 what is Bakewell referring to?
If you listen to the interrogation tape Lange said "the ex is...."
ya cause lange always told the truth....................................................................................................
The prosecution cashed in. Clark lined her pockets with 4 million dollars. Disgusted
18:00 The whole story about getting in contact with OJ makes zero sense. If OJ lived 5 minutes away - and the kids needed cared for - why didn't the officers ask the children about their fathers name, number and address? OR just drive them over to OJ's since they knew he lived at Rockingham?
Because they thought maybe Simpson might have been killed too. So you drive the kids to OJ'S, and say to the kids, "Look! Daddy's dead too. My bad." This my be a reason.
@@densel.crocker1782 No. They repeatedly said they ONLY went to OJ's to notify him of his EX-WIFE'S death and to set up arrangements to get his kids. But to answer your question. Why in the world would they assume O.J. was dead? And if O.J was dead.... WHY THE HELL would 4 detectives leave an "un-investigated" crime scene....just to go to another "un-investigated" crime scene? They went there because they thought they were going to catch OJ trying to get rid of evidence. They lied about WHY they went there, they lied about his Bronco parked "Hastily" when it was parked normal, they lied about why they went over the fence..... THEIR WHOLE STORY MAKES "0" SENSE. In the early hours of the murder investigation they were 10X more concerned about getting ahold of OJ, than the 2 dead corpse's laying back at the bungalow
Take them Nicole mother's house
@@Jeromemayle funny two brutal murder an worry about a car yeah right an who was there when they sent arne simpson pick up da kids
Wake up the children in the middle of the night at the murder scene and drag them through the murder scene so they can help the police "find their father?" You think the police should have done that?
Are you retarded or something?
Its called the biggest joke in this life time.the glove deal !! anyone w/a brain knows leather gloved fit tight and will conform to fitting right after wearing over time.
Leather also stretch
The race card is being played now more than ever!
You guys became experts in planting evidence being police officers, for sure!
Does it really matter if they thought he was a suspect? Common sense says that he would be.
it matters because they did not pursue any other leads....and there were plenty of other leads
18:28 Legally, OJ is not the next of kin.
True, but he is responsible for the children
There Ito goes again letting that killer get up and speak!!🙄🙄 Worst judge EVER!!!
OMG! Faulting a seasoned Detective for saying it's always the Husband is usually the case especially in cases like this where there has been an acrimonious divorce.
The seasoned detective should not be discussing an open case; much less mafia operatives. #whoisaware ❤️✌🏼✊🏽🤷🏽♀️😎
If 4 homicide detectives show up at your house, you’re a damn suspect. It looks like lying on the stand and manufacturing evidence is almost standard procedure, at least when they’re sure they have their guy, which is what some have claimed for decades. A guilty man walked and there’s more than enough blame to go around.
17 telephonic told them to leave
Let me see
That juror is writing notes about stuff that’s completely irrelevant
nope
Lmmfao @ Clarke!!
Also dril rap is so crazy, why they have to act like killing is cool is beyond me
This d.a . Brian kelberg is way better than Darden he should hsve been e/ Marcia as Co prosecutor. He actually did all the testimony for like 3 weeks at one point.
Confidence?? Just more cover up for the celebrity. He kept looking away, he pointed the finger at someone else, he looked uncomfortable. That’s the truth!
Im so tired of juror #6 Lon the pain in ass,he's a OJ lover. This was a solid documentary,but enough of Lon every 5 minutes.
Guilty till proven Innocent,money and fame bring no shame, straight from the files of police squad, jesus what a country
205 the husband is always a suspect.
4 my mother might be watching
Judge Ito was truly incompetent
Elite detectives left a crime scene to leave a crime scene after they took it over from some one who left it.
Interesting how you can tell the race of people in the comments section by their comments 😂
To this day. Even though the civil trial showed him in the shoes. Even though Fuhrman passed a polygraph on TV. Even though the jurors say the verdict was retaliation for Rodney King.
All that domestic violence does not necessarily mean murder. This case is almost impossible to reenact based on the evidence presented in court. The defense case is the easiest to reenact whether a person believes it or not. Ron Goldman appears to be just an addition, but no one ever discusses the Goldman part more independently.
O J Simpson left his blood at the murder scene? WhY?
@@johndeagle4389 We really can't be certain about how it got there when detective Vanatter didn't immediately book it at Parker center. He also lied on the witness stand.
@@saladincrawford8391 I'm 100 percent that OJ Simpson left his blood at the murder scene the night he murdered 2 people. He left his shoeprints for God's sake. What do you want video of the murder?
@@johndeagle4389 You can't be 100%. You can't reenact the case based on the evidence. I know you feel 100%, but no matter how strong you feel, you can't be certain about evidence wasn't planted. Two detectives lied on the witness stand and one pleaded the fifth amendment. The inmates will know and they would have beaten or killed OJ. The Goldman's are not really telling the truth, because all they want is something official that links OJ. Nobody can bring Ron Goldman back regardless of who did it. There could be the paid possibility to make him guilty via Glen Rodgers, etc. But I am not sure about that.
@@saladincrawford8391 they really need to investigate Ron Goldman and his colleagues as well as quite a few of them were killed too . The Goldman’s and Browns definitely know a lot more than what they are saying
Did homeboy really spell those... Thosz??
45 o thought media would make a big deal out of nothing.
16:21 Guy in the grey suit going to sleep
5:37 I don’t see the point in them not showing cameras on the mafia snitches when they have clearly broadcasted they got damn names every where😂😂😂😂
Blah blah blah blah blah. Still deflecting!
Judge Ito had a clear bias against the Prosecution. Ito should have worn a "Free OJ!" T-shirt to Court every day.
Marcia Clark hated judge Ito. You should read her book about the trial. It’s interesting.
@@zachgreenwood6313 Thanks for the suggestion. I will do that.
And to think, after all the breaks the LAPD gave OJ such as his original statement where they didn't pin him down on inconsistencies, went over to his house to personally notify him and multiple other kid glove things, the defense STILL accused them of orchestrating this massive conspiracy and framing him.
It was ludicrous then and is even more so now
None of that contradicts the framing lol. I’m not even convinced they framed him, but there certainly was enough to hint at that being a reasonable possibility. The LAPD officers were arrogant, how dare anyone question them and subject them to cross examination like every trial witness? How dare someone actually have the resources to compete with the state and expose their incompetence. What a joke.
How many murderers can go one on one hours after a murder and outsmart the team of police men skilled in interrogation. Do you know how improbable that is?
Jury number 6 could only hear evidence to acquit OJ ,the rest was BS to him😂
Agree. He was convinced from the beginning -
In fairness, he kept copious notes. When OJ25 continues!
Brian Kelberg seems super competent. Wonder why he didn't take this trial from the start.
27kids
I was 2 months old at the time of this verdict and even then at my extremely juvenile age I knew he was guilty 🤯
😂😂😂
I'm sorry, but Nicholes sister is a liar and terrible actress
What are you sorry for? Because you’re being mean? Would you be upset if your sister was brutally murdered? And, it’s Nicole.
O.j saying the jury had integrity is all u need to know he was sure they would come bk not guilty!
Ain’t nobody talking about that portrait found under OJs bed. Uh, that was a spiritual ritual for sure (accidentally or on purpose). Whoever placed it there should have known the what’s up. #whoisaware
❤️✌🏼✊🏽⚖️🙏🏽🔥😎
It's funny how all the pro-Simpson people conveniently gloss over his refusal to testify. If he's so innocent, why not take the stand?
hahah nice one.....standard procedure that a defendant does not testify.....it would be is lawyers advice to not testify...one thing OJ did do....when he came back from chicago...he went to the police station without a lawyer allowed them to inverview him for 1 hour..take pictures of his body, take his blood....yeah you conveniently forgot that!!!
Imagine being genuinely innocent but not having the balls to take the stand? 🤷🏻♂️
And running in your bronco on national tv lol it’s ludicrous
No balls needed. Wit and intelligence only things needed which he wisely exercised. Not Guilty !!! Thank god the majority of jurors were aboriginals of this land as the defendant. Humanity accepted without any question !!! Few/(3) soulless beings on the jury. Thank God.
@@glenneubanks3080 Do you really believe he didn’t do it?
Imagine being innocent and then you run with a change of underwear and fake mustache 🥸
@@RB-pq9ld absolutely! !!!!!
In my opinion all the evidence presented, all those damning photos of Nicole's face meant absolutely nothing to the jury I think most of them had already made their minds up before they even sat down in the jury box to find this person not guilty! They were absolutely not a good jury, that juror with all the notes kind of solidified my opinion. His notes screamed BIAS!
They did not hear these talking heads and pundits. People forget that they were sequestered no media, newspapers, and limited contact with people. This what they saw in the courtroom. There moments that blew up in the prosecutions face , the glove demonstration, the detective carrying blood to the crime scene and loosing 1.5 ccs which they never explained, Andrea Mazzola loosing bindles that contained her initials , blood not being scene initially then months later there is blood , EDTA on the socks on the blood on the back gate. These documentaries like O.J. Made in America, People vs OJ are slanted propaganda trying to rewrite history
They showed some barely visible bruising They did not show broken noses or arms, knife cuts, black eyes, or anything as ferocious as near decapitation.
@@TDKiller415 You are still brainwashed by the media and your implicit bias . Yet Simpson had no restraining order, and Nicole was writing letters trying get back with him. She only five minutes away and had joint custody of the children. Armed robbery yet it was his property. If anyone bought that property, they would have went to jail. Your fervent hatred only makes you look foolish
@@TDKiller415 What facts they LAPD was caught lying in every angle you refuse to accept the facts they tampered with evidence . I’m the Racist and bias person ? No your just a hater who is so self righteous nothing special about you and you preaching about OJ Simpson is guilty makes you feel right . Name one person in that trial who was credible? Funny Fuhrman found all the evidence yet he was removed from the case. The Rockingham Glove had Kato dog hairs and unidentified Caucasian male hair . Kyle Rittenhouse the judge was in his favor that’s why he got off and the crime was on tape .
@@TDKiller415 Vincent Bugliosi is a Monday Morning Quarter back they Defense would have destroyed him . The prosecutions own evidence blew up in their face
I wouldnt trust Furman 😂, but i dont believe Vanhatter planted any socks or tampered with evidence, injust didnt get that from him,thats just my opinion
if my lawyer started rhyming
FIRED!!!
Why would a cop plant blood or have to plant blood on a sock or lie on a suspect ? A LIE NEEDS THE TRUTH BUT THE TRUTH DOESN'T NEED A LIE
Oj. got his justice...prison then death.
The judge granting oj a statement without cross examination is RIDICULOUS, and seems to be grounds for a mistrial.
ya cause a mistrial would be great.........................
nobody had made an opinion on the trial.............................................................................................
I wonder if OJ realized that he'd be going to jail shortly after the trial anyway
O J is a very bad person
nah he's better then you and most of the prosecution at least, especially Marcia and Darden
and im the king of mars
I am sickened by the fact that two people have been brutally murdered and that fact is buried (no pun intended) under so much smoke and mirrors that it is totally lost and evidence forgotten
except........................................................................................................................................................
the prosecution did a horrible job
Cost the tax payers 5 million
his 4 kids left behind,
women being ,
beatin backward sound
try that again