Heat Transfer (25) - Flat plate convection heat transfer examples, Flows over cylinders

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @kusoe2020
    @kusoe2020 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    19:40 to 19:55 very very important thank you

  • @Oxone_2KHSO5
    @Oxone_2KHSO5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    7:38 - X must be in the numerator if you wanted to show the Reynolds number

    • @Oxone_2KHSO5
      @Oxone_2KHSO5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      10:19 the same

    • @bugrahangul3740
      @bugrahangul3740 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Oxone_2KHSO5 I thinks so. Are u sure for that?

  • @inessogoodnolove
    @inessogoodnolove 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i believe that the output for the kinematic viscosity yields 8.06e-7 and not 78.2e-8 using the thermophysical properties on the board

  • @SecretTruthsoftheWorld
    @SecretTruthsoftheWorld หลายเดือนก่อน

    the vapor value was taken as the dynamic viscosity. Therefore, the dynamic viscosity value should be 0.789e-3. In this case, the kinematic viscosity will be 7.92e-7. Although the dynamic viscosity obtained by the teacher is correct, the kinetic viscosity was calculated incorrectly. the formula for finding the reynolds number in the nusselt number is incorrect. It should be Vx/v.

  • @stephennalepa9531
    @stephennalepa9531 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    7:08 I believe your equations for the Nu number are wrong

  • @alternatifoyuncu8026
    @alternatifoyuncu8026 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how do we find the properties from table,ı do some interpolation but it does not result same as 2:01

  • @SecretTruthsoftheWorld
    @SecretTruthsoftheWorld หลายเดือนก่อน

    kinematic viscosity is 8,06224e-7

  • @Mieraf-z9r
    @Mieraf-z9r 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you that was very helpful

  • @ryanm3662
    @ryanm3662 ปีที่แล้ว

    For flat plate questions 1 and 2: He writes U/VX for the Reynold's number (which is wrong), but his value for h is computed using UX/V (which is right). He makes this mistake in class because the equations on the side of the board also have this error, but his pre-written notes evidently have the correct formula.

    • @CPPMechEngTutorials
      @CPPMechEngTutorials  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Please provide a time stamp where this occurs so we can check it out.

    • @ryanm3662
      @ryanm3662 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@CPPMechEngTutorials 7:38, just like Alex says below. Also he issues an explanation for the mistake during the first 3 minutes of lecture video 28.

    • @CPPMechEngTutorials
      @CPPMechEngTutorials  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ryanm3662 Thanks. We will place a correction in the show notes below the video.

  • @gajendrasingh_384
    @gajendrasingh_384 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation for a complex problem. You earned a subscriber. Love from India ❤

  • @alexbrightchargeai
    @alexbrightchargeai 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    great teaching but some of the numbers he's writing in his examples are from outer space. someone buy this man a working calculator

  • @NicolasCalero-s9d
    @NicolasCalero-s9d ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks^100