ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Clarifying The Transgression Of The Ottoman Empire Against The Land Of Tawheed & It’s People
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ส.ค. 2024
- #Erutugrul_Ghazi #ottoman_empire #Saudi_Arabia
تبيين ظلم وعدوان الدولة العثمانية على دولة التوحيد وأهلها
Clarifying The Oppression & Transgression Of The Ottoman Empire Against The Land Of Tawheed & It’s People
الشيخ محمد الفيفي
Shaykh Muhammad al-Fayfi
معلومات تخفى على كثير من المسلمين لعل لأول مرة نسمع عنها
Information that Is hidden from many of the muslims perhaps it’s the first time we are hearing about it
Im a muslim from bosnia and following the manhaj of the salaf, alhamdulillah. But the ottomans had some good in them isnt it? They brought islam to the balkans, thats why the albanian and bosnians accepted islam.
Maybe so, but overwhelmingly their dealing with people of Tawheed was horrendous. الحمد لله you are Salafi but majority of the muslims in balkans were upon soofiya which the Ottoman Empire called to. الحمد لله for the spread of the Haq in the Balkans and all parts of the world.
Allah brought Islam to the Balkans. The Ottomans may have done some good things, but their evil outweighs that obviously.
*Which Islam are you talking about? Shirk and Bidaat are not in Islam. Aoozubillah*
Historically speaking, islam came in albania way before the turkish othoman invasion.
Muslims in balkans, they exepted islam from their own free will, .when you consider the shirk that they brought in aswell,, you can clearly say that there was no good in them whatsoever,, or the evil was greater than the goodnes that they brought.
They did little investment in albania, bu build some bridges and roads, which were on their benefits, to travell easy throu these lands.
There is not a city in albania or kosova, which doesnt have a grave ,place of shirk, dating back to the othomans.
All they did was ,, gathering soldiers yaniceries,, to fight for them.and in some cases forced them.
There was no justice,, or any sharia implemented by them ,in these lands.
Thats why albanians rebelled against them, and fought them many times.
Earlier ottomans not later
INDEED!! this is the first time we have heard. *Please* share more of these historical facts. JazaakAllaaho khairan.
ottoman sultan are the one who crushed the Byzantine empire in constantinople....for me, they are heroes of islam..
@NasirAlHanbali please upload more on this topic ( Regarding history of ottoman empire ). I request you to kindly upload full lectures of shaykhs not only just 5-7 minute video. JajakAllahu khayran for this video. Keep working.
Hearing this shattered my heart into pieces
I heard british are scared Saudis would unite india like they united 4 mathhabs, dumb sufis praying to graves, like preists, following shia christmas imitation mawlid had no base knowledge as sufis teach cultism, they went from zuhud dunya to zuhud din, disempowered & divided Muslims as colonists wanted while Salafiya did the opposite as he taught in his book Prophet's prayer, Sheikh Albani , all 4 mathhabs were salafi and taught transparency - we dont divide in names of imams like shias do while hiding bida and shirk, we are all to follow the Sunnah. Even Ashari in ladder part of life got closer, the psudeo Ashari spread after crusades but Prophet peace and blessings on him said to follow the salaf who even Imam Ashari repented to follow.
British pushed divisive sufi movements like tabligh and stuff, this is the main intellectual fitna, the physical ones is kawarij and shia combines between those 2 and other bida! Ahlul hadith India were also Persecuted I heard.
MiaW did hijrah to defend , gave Baya and spread Tawhid, he was a defensive Imam of the Sunnah. He wanted unity with the turks but due to their bida which got worse and led to infiltration because all the liars fit in, they fell apart by rebellions from Jordan who they defended from the Saudis who didn't rebel but who they attacked century or so earlier. Boy were the Turks wrong and consumed by their own evil. Colonists had influence in that turks lands like Egypt, so i wonder if they instigated but Saudis with sunnah could of united the Ottomons/ Uthmanis and prevented their bida division standardlessness and infiltration Insha Allah! oh well! Saudis eventually beat Hashemite Jordan who was betrayed over Palestine.
from 1930s to 1980s no terrorism except from israelis and maybe ikwanis, and then iran started suicide terrorism and secret aid to israelis who just lost the sinai in 73 to Sunnis. cia backed iran in 79. Ahlul Sunnah is free from kawarij terrorism, this is the right solution, ikwanis backed by british reintroducing bida that fell the Uthmani Ottomons is the wrong cultic response.
MAy Allah guide us to learn from this and spread Sunnah to the dumb sufis and protect us from ppl lie on history in addition to lying on Islam like the sufi kawarij yasir fadi and imran nazir! May Allah either expose or disable them or both if they don't repent. Amin!
We need more of such knowledge and history. Jezak'Allah khair
Barak Allah ya sheikh
Wallahi, I did not know about this. May Allah forgive me for my negligence. What kind of Khilafa was this ? Alhamdulillah, Allah took it away from these people.
Yh, but remember that was end of their rule. there was good on their rule also but at the end it was very bad.
I made a history video about first saudi state and their war against ottoman empire and egyptian khedivate (1812-1818)
And what happened after that? Is still visible from British occupation to Israeli domination and American invasion and indirect occupation
He was right but only during there decline in 1789-1922
During it's foundation and golden era they were appling Sharia law purely. They had there ups and downs but no doubt they were a Islamic empire
أللهم إنا نعوذ بك من زوال نعمتك وتحول عافيتك وفجاءة نقمتك ومن جميع سخطك
May allahs mercy and blessings be upon Shyakh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab and Shyakh Al Saud .😢 Jazakallahu khairan Akhi . Plz upload more on this topic .
Aameen. Allahu Akbar!!
As salaam mu alay kum waragmahtuALLAAH hi wabarakahtu akhee, jazakahALLAAH khairan for this, do you have the full lecture so we can benefit from it, In Sha ALLAAH
جزاك الله خيرا الجزء
Very interesting, however I did some research and it was said that Abdullah ibn saud sacked Karabala and attacked the grave of imam husayan. There is always two sides of the story.
That’s not two side bruh they sacked it to establish tawheed
You do know there’s 2 graves of Hussain which the Shi’a make pilgrimage to? One in Iraq and one in Egypt. They’re a joke.
May Allah remove them shrines.
well if u see the reason for the attack u will know why he did it dumb shia
Its mind🤯blowing how some of the ummah overlook the worship of graves, pure shirk, just to say the ottoman empire did good as well. Subhanallah. The shatan, may Allah curse him, can tell the truth but he's still a habitual liar. May Allah give us ikhlas. May Allah give us hidayah.
Do you have the link to the full lecture please ?
تقبلهم الله من الشهداء وبشرهم بالفردوس الاعلى, هذا حال اهل التوحيد في كل عصر
HafizakAllahu ya shaikh. May Allah give you Ajr Azeem for giving us this great historical info. Allahu Akbar. JazakAllahu khairah. Can someone put the English subtitles of this Complete Dars, please. I'm on Tauheed for 25 years now but until today I've been in the darkness about the sacrifices of our Imam. O Allah, accept their shahadah and bestow us the same shahadah you bestowed to them. Aameen. Allahu Akbar. I was in the misconception that Saudi Arabia was got without bloodshed. Allahu Akbar. I was unaware of this reality. Allahu Akbar.
Allahumma Adhillashirka wAlMushrikeena ya Rabb AlAalameen. Aameen. Allahumm Arzuqna shahadatan fee sabeelika Yaa Rabbana. Aameen.
Allahu Akbar!
I heard this long ago , understand ready what is happen ,jazakallahu Khair Syaikh
I am not encouraging khuruj, but lets be real. The Arab and African Muslims revolted because of the growing idea of "Ottomanism" (which was a move towards secularism and influenced by anti-Muslim French thinkers) and Turkish nationalism among the Ottomans. The Ottoman empire lead itself to it's own demise. If the Muslims sought true knowledge united on tahweed without shirk, only then can we have a unified Islamic empire.
This is true. Greetings from 🇹🇷
when did they revolt and who exactly revolted?
@@kyokushinfightfullmma Ottoman empires is evil even before the young turks.
@@user-yq2if6ld9h search up arab revolt
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and then Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi, Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
Sad but true, Nowadays arabia is becoming land of music festivals, shirk shrines and Rafida taking over.
Shrines, Shirk and Sufiyyah not comes with Ottoman. It was already exist from begining of Umayyads. Umayyads loved to build extraordinary
fancy buildings and monuments to show how glory they rule. Same history applied to Ottomans. You cannot make an individual exception what Ottoman sees.
Assalamualikum jazakallah hul khair 💕🇮🇳
Allah will protect the knowledge he has always done so and lead the faithful calls they will forever be remembered . Whoever follows guidance will love the land of tawheed for the pleasure of Allah I ask Allah for forgiveness for our brothers who have proceeded us.
Dear Sheikh,
I have noticed that when you speak about the Ottoman Empire, there seems to be a focus on its negative aspects. While it's true that no empire or government is perfect, I feel that it's important to consider the broader historical context.
Our beloved Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) praised the conquest of Istanbul, saying, "Istanbul will surely be conquered. The commander that conquers Istanbul is what a beautiful commander." This hadith is well-known, and it signifies the importance of this event in Islamic history.
If the Ottoman Empire were truly as negative as some portray, why would our Prophet praise the conquest of Istanbul, which was achieved by the Ottomans? And why would Allah allow such a significant victory to be granted to them?
I urge you to consider the possibility that some of the negative perceptions about the Ottoman Empire might be influenced by external narratives, particularly those spread by the British Empire to sow discord among Muslims. After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, we saw the tragic consequences in places like Algeria, Palestine, Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan. Perhaps these events are a reflection of the consequences of division among our Ummah.
Please, let us be cautious about the sources of our information and avoid spreading any propaganda that could further divide us. I ask you to reconsider the way the Ottoman Empire is discussed, keeping in mind the importance of unity and the teachings of our Prophet.
May Allah guide us all and keep us on the straight path.
Subhan’Allah this is the first time I heard
May Allah reward you akhi Nasir for translating this for us! Jazakallahu Khair! Akhi I would request you to do a video playlist on the Establishment of Saudia Arabia and the atrocities and misguidance of the Ottoman empire.
^^^ agreed
That was emotional subhanAllah
Barakallaah Feek ya sheikh
I'm pretty sure they sent armies because the Arabs were revolting not because they were against the dawah of Tawheed but maybe I'm wrong
True... The orders were to retake Mecca and Madeena... The rest was hate of aqeedah
The revolt was justified as Quran states “If two parties (or groups) among the believers fall to fighting, then make peace between them both. But if one of them outrages against the other, then fight you (all) against the one that which outrages till it complies with the Command of Allah. Then if it complies, then make reconciliation between them justly, and be equitable. Verily, Allah loves those who are the equitable. Quran: 49: 9
Ottomans had the aqeedah of shirk and bidah
@@barryirlandi4217 Asalam Aleikum, yea but if you go to One Dawah and watch the video by Jalal on Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab, he answers many points. The Najdis were taken to jail during hajj and Uthmanis refused to realease them, the Najdis were defending their people in a sense.
@@KGF-zf2qj if Saudi Arabia goes against Islam, then is it also justified to revolt against Saudi rulers?
Jazakallahu Khairan ya akhi. Alhamdulillah for Salafiyyah. I'm not emotional fool like khareji jahmis.
May Allah bless us, protect us and erase our sins.
When the Sheikh said , the people of knowledge know the Scholars than i remembered hearing this from Sheikh Zafarul Hasan Madani (Hafidhahullah)
التعليقات عديد منها جاهل بالتاريخ الدولة عثمانية كاي دولة اسلامية فيها صالح وطالح لكنها وحدت المسلمين وفتحت القسطنطنية وطردت الصلبيين من الاناضول وحمت المسلمين من الحملات صالبية وظلت تقاتل حتى سقطت بسبب الفساد والخيانة وتاتي لمحو تاريخ عمره اكثر من 600 سنة والله ان دولة العثمانية كان فيها ناس صلاح ماتوصل لهم
اقرؤ تاريخ فكره دولة عثمانية هو اكاذيب روجها الكفار لتشويه صورتها والمؤسف ها انتم تقعون في نفس الفخ
Not an Arab though (a Bengali Muslim from Bangladesh), but saying, for religious reasons the Bangladeshi and Pakistanis love the Ottoman Empire so much that they don't even want to know the true history of this empire. And they think that all Muslims worldwide think like them and want the Ottoman Caliphate back. But the Arabs who were under their rule knew very well about the empire, and of course they have their reasons for that. As a Bengali if I tell them this, they call me Kafir and non-Muslim. Of course, this Ottoman Empire is one of the magnificent empires in the history of Islam and mankind and of Europe, and as a Muslim I am proud of that. But we can't deny what un-Islamic things the Turks did when they ruled such a vast quantity of land just because of their power, royalty and might.
As i a bangladeshi i would understand the perspective of us bengalis as many of us wouldnt understand this because we never had a khilafah in our land. Secondly, as much as i agree with the wrong doings of the ottomans, there is no denying that there is a bias, a nationalist perspective and a strong pleasement to the royals that is being imposed by various imams in current saudi arabia. Something isnt clicking in this video which i want to say but i dont want to make any accusations without clearcut evidences.
Honestly, it is true that the Kingdom of Saudi have had kings who did some things wrong and they focus on those mistakes. They are humans and they are not going to be perfect, but then they paint the ottoman empire as if it was this 100% perfect empire. Yes, they may have had a few kings who were good but the reality is that they were just a kingdom that was Muslim and not a calpihate and nor were they perfect.
Ottomans= sharak
Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu
Subhan Allah!
Aslmlkm, JZK for sharing. Is there any more of this lecture? Would love it if you could upload it please
لا الله اله ال الله ... رحمة الله الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب واهله وهل الدرعية وكل من مات في هذه الوقت لاجل التوحيد...آمين
May Allah return it Ameen
Says the one who was born from the British
Good video masha'Allah
Ottoman Khilafat was there for over 700 years, so during that period , they didn’t apply sharia law ?
Weren’t they Practicing Muslim ???
Now so many questions are arising in my mind ?
I will definitely consult the ulama , In sha Allah?
May Allah give us sehat and afiyat
Ameen
They lasted 600 years.. Many crimes were committed... Also, beware of ghuloo for.. Or against the Ottomans
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and then Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi, Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
I was wondering shaikh if u consider now days saudi gov as dawlah tawheeed? Lokk what is gojng on in Riyadh
subscribed btw. akhii was this incident of the siege before or after the siege of Madinah ?
Akhi any reference???
SubhanAllah
Please upload more videos from other scholars such as shaykh ibn baz ..fawzan.. Uthymeen ..al albani please brother
Ma.sha Allah
this canged my views of the History...
Ameen
the Ottomons due to so much sufi bida , had no unity, we are to unite on Sunnah but they did bida and divided so much they became reunited secular like christians, due to ignoring scripture while Quran is preserved. they Uthmanis even allowed same sex sins, Naoothubillah! this is why bida is haram, they use psudeo Ashari tawil as their window, and sufis normalize bida using the dream hadith, we need to teach them Imam Ashari repented and sufism is a destabilizing preistly evil while calling back to the din. We need to clear up history because the sufis know they can't win with Kitab and Sunnah so they teach cultism and even when ppl wake up to that they lie on history, character assassination and even real assassinations due to their ghulu and evil, from ignroance to arrogance to violence. May Allah guide us to truth and good in din and dunya for His sake and faith & make things clear. Amin!
Saudis have the Aqidah of Calipha of Salaf, while Uthmanis had Aqidah of Khalaf of Psuedo Asharis which spread after ppl defeded from crusades which took place after the Salaf's Imams Aqidah like Ibn Hanbal (teacher of Bhukari) was challenged. REad book history of Islamic Aqidah by Muhammad Aman al Jami for a 200 standard page beautiful read on this topic with key points and development of fitnah in times of salaf.
Ottomon arrogance to Saudis reminds me of Qayraish arrogance to the Sunnis of before with the music. I notice alot in common with first Saudi Kingdom and the Sahabas Radiyallahu anhum and the awliyah of before! Sufis play the victim but should be ashamed they had no basis for what they did! Saudis corrected the dawa of the sharifs who would rebel against you in ww1 after your sufi dawa was infiltrated.
TAwhid is linked to security as we see in Quran 24, 55 and sufi and shias shirk leads to colonization as we read in hadiths and see in their lands - a clear sign of whose on truth for the emotional ones.
and the problem is the sufi bida being cultic only gets worse and ilm is replaced with ghulu which leads to shirk, May Allah save us from the sufi taqiya imitators of shiasm! They claim to be Sunni but need to learn the basis of salafi dawa to be fully Sunni and know how to unite on Sunnah and not divide on bida, not sufi blocking to the scriptures in name of mathhabs which Sheikh Albani exposed as false in his book PRophet's prayer as all 4 mathhabs were salafi and despite their errors united in manhaj/method. Rahimahullahum!
May Allah prepare us to give good dawa for His Sake. Amin!
tribute to the sufis
I remember when the Shiekh came to Masjid Tawheed in Stone Mountain a few years ago
Its his personal opinion, Ottomans had some weird practices but they flew the flag of Islam.
But shaykh Saalih ala Shaykh mentioned that the Ottomans were more enclined to the truth in their beginning phases of the empire, but later on distanced more from the truth.
Any explanation about this specific issue?
Btw, I love this shaykh. His words are powerful tabarakAllah.
This is the time frame the Shaykh is referring to. The Ottoman had good no doubt but they deviated far from Tawheed, erecting shrines over the graves, abolishing the Shari’ah, and murdering the callers to tawheed because it opposed the grave worship which they pushed through the Islamic world - if Allah wills I will post source books written by historians during that era which the Sufis & Ikhwānis hide. Remember the Sufis are an extension of the Shi’ah, this grave worship was introduced to the Islamic world by the Shi’ah and the Sufis took it on after them. That is why you will find Sufi grave worshippers and Ikhwānis over praising the Ottoman Empire as if they upheld Tawheed and the Sunnah when the actual reality is in contrary to their claims.
@@NasirAlHanbali Post more insha Allah. Djazakumullahu khayran.
@@NasirAlHanbali Please do my brother BarakAllahu feek. May Allah protect you. Aameen And there is NO GOODNESS WITHOUT TAUHEED. SubhanAllah. So do not call them good. INNA-SH-SHIRKA LAZHULMUN ADHEEM
Yes definitely in the beginning they were upon sunnah because Allah would not have given them victory and power if they werent upon sunnah. In fact I believe theres even a hadeeth predicting the conquering of constantinople and the commander who did it.
But later on they fell into sufism and fought dawah salafia so Allah took away their power and put upon them a period of recession and weakness where they were called "the sick man of europe".
And then when they still refused to correct their Aqeedah and their deeds they crumbled entirely as we know.
@@NasirAlHanbali donmehs and mongol who became Muslims for political reasons in 11th century. They bought pagan innovation . You can google donmeh you will learn new reality inshallah.
May Allah Be Pleased with Them All.
عاشت الدولة العثمانية
Ottoman empire was good at first and at its end times, they started shirk and stuff. or else they were people like mehmet fatih rahimullah and others
It had its up and down.
This is heartwrenching if true💔💔💔
But crushing your Muslim brothers with the help of kuffar as u did is also heartwrenching
💔💔💔
Now u made a kingdom based on tawheed but what u are doing now is clear that u are the representatives of the cowards who are the friends and shareholders of shaytan.
It is evident and clear no one can deny.
Have you do called ul'ama raised a voice against the decisions made by MBS which are clearly against teachings of Islam.
Muslims were prospering and safe first because of ALLAH then Ottomans u crushed Ottomans and here we are witnessing our Destruction
😢😢
Subhanallah. These atrocities were completely alien to people like me, May Allah forgive and shower his mercy upon the revivers of this faith. May Allah make the flags of Tawheed fly high in other nations of Muslims the likes of my country of origin Afghanistan and others.
Can someone clarify this point for me, was the ottoman empire established upon correct aqeedah principles at the beginning and during their rise and Tasawuff and bidah infiltrated it later and lead to its downfall? Or were these practices evident in the beginning?
BarakAllahu feekum
Ameen.
Are you from afganistan?
@@CosmoCreed indeed
@@qm6595 Assalamualaikum where are you right now ?
@@qm6595 people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid Ilah and shunning shirk but were Maturidi & when they were exiled and scapegpated for 1683, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and then Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi, Qatar or Bahrain... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
@@qm6595 JAzak Allahu Khayr brother!
May Allah reunite with them .ahlul twaheeed..
‘Verily you shall conquer Constantinople. What a wonderful leader will her leader be, and what a wonderful army will that army be!’ Did our prophet really praise the sufi ottomans?? They have lost many men to the shia, the byzantines and the catholics to protect the ahli sunnah for centuries. Shame on you!!
"Verily you shall conquer Constantinople. What a wonderful leader will her leader be, and what a wonderful army will that army be!"
The Sufis try to use this narration to authenticate their Ashariyyah and their erecting domes on graves, saying: “if what the ottomans did wasn’t right why would the Prophet ﷺ praise him.”
Muhammad Khan or Fātih as he was called because he conquered Qustantineeyyah in 857.
First of all: though some of the scholars have said this hadeeth is Hasan if you look and research far from your emotions and far away from Turkish dramas and Sufi shrines you will find the hadeeth is weak for the following reasons: one of the narrators of the hadeeth Abdullah ibn Bashr al-Khathami is unknown and reports from unknowns are not accepted.
His name is differed over, his father’s name and his ascription is differed over: it is said his name is Abdullah or Ubaydullah or Ubayd, it is said his father’s name is Basheer or Bashr and his ascription is either Khatha’mi or Ghanawi.
You can refer back to As-Silsilah tud-Da’eefah 778.
Shaykh Humūd at-Tuwayjiri mentioned in his book ittihaaf ul-Jamā’ah: I will summarize it: that the conquest of Muhammad al-Fātih is not the one intended by the Prophet ﷺ for the following reasons:
1) The conquest of Qustanteeniyyah which was intended by the Prophet ﷺ will be after Great Slaughter" (al-malhama al-kubra) [hasn’t taken place yet]
The Prophet (ﷺ) said: The flourishing state of Jerusalem will be when Yathrib is in ruins, the ruined state of Yathrib will be when the great war comes, the outbreak of the great war will be at the conquest of Constantinople and the conquest of Constantinople when the Dajjal (Antichrist) comes forth. He (the Prophet) struck his thigh or his shoulder with his hand and said: This is as true as you are here or as you are sitting (meaning Mu'adh ibn Jabal).
2) That will be right before the appearance of the dajjal
3) They will conquer Qustanteeniyyah whilst saying Subhaanallah, Laa ilaaha illallaa, Allaahu Akbar and not with great numbers nor weaponry.
4) it will take place at the hands of the Arabs not the Turks because the army will come FROM Madinah and The people of Madinah are Arabs.
The Last Hour would not come until the Romans would land at al-A'maq or in Dabiq. An army consisting of the best (soldiers) of the people of the earth at that time will come from Medina (to counteract them). When they will arrange themselves in ranks, the Romans would say: Do not stand between us and those (Muslims) who took prisoners from amongst us. Let us fight with them; and the Muslims would say: Nay, by Allah, we would never get aside from you and from our brethren that you may fight them. They will then fight and a third (part) of the army would run away, whom Allah will never forgive. A third (part of the army) which would be constituted of excellent martyrs in Allah's eye, would be killed and the third who would never be put to trial would win and they would be conquerors of Constantinople. And as they would be busy in distributing the spoils of war (amongst themselves) after hanging their swords by the olive trees, the Satan would cry: The Dajjal has taken your place among your family. They would then come out, but it would be of no avail. And when they would come to Syria, he would come out while they would be still preparing themselves for battle drawing up the ranks. Certainly, the time of prayer shall come and then Jesus (peace be upon him) son of Mary would descend and would lead them. When the enemy of Allah would see him, it would (disappear) just as the salt dissolves itself in water and if he (Jesus) were not to confront them at all, even then it would dissolve completely, but Allah would kill them by his hand and he would show them their blood on his lance (the lance of Jesus Christ). Muslim
5) The ones who participated in the Great Slaughter" (al-malhama al-kubra) will be the ones who will conquer Qustanteeniyyah once again and they are the ones praised by the Prophet ﷺ the hadeeth above is a proof for this also.
6) this has not taken place yet because it will take place right before the appearance of the dajjal
Shaykh Ahmad Shakir - may Allah have mercy upon him - mentioned that the first conquest of Qustanteeniyyah which took place at the hands of the Ottomans was not the intended one by the Prophet ﷺ, rather it is the preface of the major conquest of it which is intended by the hadeeth.
The first army that invaded it was praised by the Prophet ﷺ in Bukhari under the leadership of Yazeed ibn Mua’awiyyah and Abu Ayyūb al-Ansāri and other companions that were a part of it and Ibn Taymiyyah quoted a consensus on this issue.
The second army which is praised is the army that will recapture Qustanteeniyyah from the Kuffār who will be strong in Aqeedah because they will conquer it and praise Allah with Subhaanallah, Laa ilaaha illallaa, Allaahu Akbar and not with great numbers nor weaponry.
They will be people of Tawheed as the scholars such as Shaykh al-Fawzan and Albani have mentioned.
They will not be those who build domes and shrines on graves as was done to the grave of the famous companion Abu Ayyub al-Ansari - may Allah be pleased with him - after the conquest of the Ottomans of Qustanteeniyyah, nor will this army that the Prophet ﷺ praised carry the filthy Aqeedah of Suffiyah.
@@NasirAlHanbali isn't the Hadeeth weak?
Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh. I had no idea that this had happened.
Surely what you dislike in the Jama'ah is better than what you like outside the Jama'ah
In certain periods there was good and bad when it comes to the Ottoman empire. Some of the early Islamic empires were no better towards Tawheed.
🇹🇷❤️💪
If, as you say, the Ottomans were not on the right path of Islam, it would not have existed for more than five hundred years, and Allah would have destroyed it.
So the British usa France Spain
Lost long in muslim territory
That makes them good?
Where did you get this number from? 😂😂 And Allāh did indeed destroy it.
The ottomans did not commit shirk the sultans did not do bidah knowingly. It was only some blind faithed Turks who did "zikr circles"
We love Ottoman empire,
We know very well what happen,
Everyone has weakness and Major weakness of wahabisim is to claim all other sects had wrong Aqeeda.
Ottoman ruled only Hijaz for years and Hijaz had Qadhi for each sects. And not all Muslims were Sufi but how come suddenly Saudis empire quarrels with Ottoman empire? For regimes lived peaceful together for years? and why happen during a time of Ottoman declination?
What I see here is brainwashing of people who believe certain sect to Royal before their King.
sects? There is only one correct sect. That is the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamah. Either yout aqeedah is that of the Ahlus Sunnah or your aqeedah is an innovation. There are not different versions of correct aqeedah
Wow
The way I see it, Allah wouldn’t let it collapse if they were really on the Haq of Quran and sunah with no bidah and shirk.
Exactly, they blame it on wahabis(Arabs at that time)🥲 like Allah would bring down an Islamic khalifa because of few Arabs!!! Which clearly contradicts the Quran, Allah says in Quran 47:7
“O you who have believed, if you support Allah, He will support you and plant firmly your feet.” So clearly they didn’t support the course of Allah by sticking to tawheed so Allah humiliated and belittled them 🤌🏿 and Allah knows best
@@MohamedAhmed-rf5bk yup. Whereas allah isn’t doing anything bad to saudi, media does it by twisting things. But from Islamic perspective they still have Quran and sunnah firm no open shirk. Even tho they make mistakes and fall in to some worldly affairs. They’re strong and happy
Apply this same criteria to the arabs?
We shouldn't take anything from palace scholars, our prophet has said scholars are more dangerous than dajjal and Saudi scholars fall in that fold
Abu Dhar said : “I was with the Prophet Muhammed (Peace be upon him) one day and I heard Him saying “There is something I fear for my Ummah than the dajjal”. It was then I became afraid, so I said “O Messenger of ALLAH what thing is that?” He (PBUH) replied “Misguided and astray scholars”
May Allah continue to protect and guide the people upon the tawheed .
may allah bless ottomans 🏴
Allah* and they were humans, and not all were teh same.
I hate sufis and who killed the people of tawheed...
But they dead one man ataturk destroyed them
may allah curse you and the ottomans
يا الشيخ ناصر زيك يا فندم
I hate it when athariyyah is mixed with politics
Very good lecture by the Sheikh۔ when we are conclude our opinion then we must listen both sides۔ I also first time I listen the salafie side even though I love selfie olama for their straight forward on the commentary of Quran and hadees but on this contemporary issue I have so many objections Saudi's but today I listen and attain knowledge that ottaman Empire had also been make so many catastrophe and mistakes and brutality۔
Were the Ottomans wrong? Yes. But unfortunately when people say Sisi is wrong in Egypt or MBZ in UAE they are told they become Khawarij for not supporting Sisi/MBZ
Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, no one will enter Paradise but a soul submissive to Allah, yet Allah may support this religion by the hands of a wicked man.”
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3062, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 111
وهل مابعدها افضل؟
هي افضل مما بعدها ولا شك
هي سوت أشنع شيء الشرك
هل يوجد شيء أشنع من الشرك
Again there is much to says about Wahabis (aka salafist). Wahabis idelogi is the same as DAES! Please beware. They are not sunnis as they claims!
Hadrat Ibn Hajar al-Makki said:
"Ibn Taymiyyah denied the immunity of prophets from sins. However, it is one of the attributes of prophets."
He objected to one's visiting the blessed grave of our Master the Prophet and those of the Companions, the Awliya', scholars, and pious Muslims. He considered it haram to use them as a means for intercession. [Fatawa al-Hadisiyya]
Hadrat Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani stated:
He spoke ill of the great ones of the Companions and said "It is haram to set out on a journey to visit the grave of the Messenger of Allah. [Hadrat] Ali's iman was not valid because he was a child when he believed. [Hadrat] Uthman had excessive love for wealth." [Ad-Durar-ul-Kamina]
Ibn Taymiyyah said, "It is not necessary to make up qada salats." However, making up a qada salat is obligatory in all of the four madhhabs. He claimed that the torment of Hell would not be eternal. However, there are many Qur'anic verses stating that disbelievers will remain in Hell eternally. (Al-Baqara 81, Al-Ahzab 65, Fussilat 28, Az-Zukhruf 74)
Here he comes and tells the story from his perspektiv. Eyvallah! isnt it his right?
But as sunni (you who watch this) know your history and be very wary what you says about Allahu teala's Khalife! it is not my place and yours place to says anything against them. Look what happend after to muslims in world when they took khalife down.
why do you complain when people rebel against the leaders ? THe Ottomans were Muslims and they were your leaders and even if they were tyrants and they did all that you said they did you still have to obery them and not speak out against them according to the Quran and Sunnah upon the understanding of Salaf . So make your mind up ...Because they are no longer here, is that why you speak out now. If the state of affairs was the same now would you be calling to fight the Ottomans ?
asak, why don't MUSLIM want to read history on their own and understand what really happened? instead of relying on these people who give you only one side of the story. Is it rocket science to read? There are many videos on what really happened, who were these people who collaborated with British, french, german to dismantle whatever little power muslims had. The same story was repeated in Indian sub-continent. Also, do you really want the saudi government? of now or the past? look at all "north african countries", arab countries, do you think they are on aqeedah? work for Islam? if you believe then I have an ocean of water on moon for sale. People wake up, READ, READ, READ.. then reflect This is the first step to knowledge and allah in quran repeatedly challenges humanity and ask humans to get it. please don't depend on others that you should be doing yourself. By the way ask your self and also this shiekh should ask himself, where in islam says collaborate with non-mulsims to bring down muslims? this has become so common from last 150 years now.. who was lawrence of arabia? or at least watch "omer mukhtar" the movie if you can't or don't want to read the history.
Allahu a3lam if this version is correct..i prefer not to trust the saud nor the ottoman
Nothing is perfect, ottoman empire wasn't also the case many errors and mistakes had been made against the poor midle eastern poor people but can't also forget the good things she did, from 1300 to 1700 it was the only one doing jihad against Europe and safavids, do you have any idea how many cursades and battles the ottomans won to protect the holy places? it was good she was gone but many sultans did great things to protect our beloved religion.... nothing is perfect good and bad is everywhere which is the same as saudi today who is watching our brothers ans sisters being raped and killed.
BROTHERS AND SISTERS THIS WAS NOT THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AT ITS CORE . ORIGINAL OTTOMAN EMPIRE WAS FAIR AND JUST. At times they had evil sultans and these were the results of it .
الْحَمْدُ للَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَـلَمِينَ
They were in power for 600 years, and your going against the whole empire for what happen in the 1700s. There have been many adila and great khalifs and sultans in the ottoman empire.
They were ṣufī qubūrī mubtadī`a. There’s no way around it.
How love is salafi ulama say even abey turk ruler no matter how they againt salafi
Who is introduction
04:14
Saudi arabia is the transgressor. Why is saudi a kingdom? Did our prophet muhammad ❤saws established kingdom for himself? Subhaanallaah
Could you please talk about the kufr of the Gulf rulers if you are truth teller
If not shut up
Saudi arabia land od tawheed? Really? 🤦♂️
name me a country more islamic then saudi ?
@@user-ue4fh5mv9sturkey ini lol where the tawheed is to worship ataturk alone
The dawah of najd was strong اللهم ارجعها
يحيى الجزائري من مركز الإبانة...
Thay say, the sufis are greater than shuhada, astaghfirullah, we ask them to give a single example of a sufi giving his blood for Islam???? Was Abdulqadir Jeelani a shaheed of Islam?? Aoozhubillahi minkum ya soofiya ya Mushrikoon in the Muslims!!
Abdul Qadir Al jeelani was not a Sufi, this is another Sufi lie
You are talking without knowledge brother don’t comment. Abdul qader al jilani is not to be spoken off in such a manner. Whether he was Sufi or not he was one of greatest scholars in history and is accepted by all.
Fear Allah swt the way he should be feared and do not speak what you have no knowledge about. Wa allahu aaalam
Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani was not sufi, he was ahlul sunnah. Check sharh of the treatise by Sheikh Salih al Fawzaan, the sheikh praises Sheikh Abdul Qadir in this book.
Abdul Qadee Jeelani was a salafi aalim. He even praised salafi in his book.
@@Somalinomad416 go to SalafiRi and you will see Abdul Ghadir's biography from ibn Kathir and Dhahabi, his book quotes shows he is Salafi.
This guy is full of lies and taking things way out of context. Pure liar
If you can't refute, then shut up.
Explain the lies then plZ
Enlighten us with the truth
That's you jaahil al safeeh
No wonder Turkey empire collapsed its because of the atrocities they commited