John 17:17 - Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth. Matthew 24:35 - Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. Colossians 3:16 - Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God. Luke 11:28 - But he said, “Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it!” Isaiah 40:8 - The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever.
Trees DON'T make houses. Grains DON'T make flour. Berries DON'T make jams. PEOPLE make houses, flour, and jams. Sensible people know this and respect the Creator first and then people, never plants. Are you one of those empty-minded individuals who also think that "guns" kill people? By the logic you have presented in your comment, you must be. News Flash for you: Guns DON'T kill people. People kill people. Your profile name really needs to be changed. You obviously do not know anything about critical thinking. Just saying. Trust the Lord Jesus Christ and He will not only save you but help you to escape the state of confusion you are living in.
Psa 147:4 He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names. Gen 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. Gen 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. No more new stars to be created, that work of creation was ended on the 6th day of creation, maybe the scientists are aware of this and are desperate to find new stars forming, so they can find accusation.
You make a good argument. I wonder though, does it mean there won't be new stars? He ended creation with only 2 humans and now there are billions yet he can still number the hairs on our head. Maybe when new stars form he gives them a new name. I am skeptikal of this on scientific grounds. Have ypu ever looked at the original bible translation of those passages?
@@tonyabrown7796 we don't interpret the Bible to fit science. Science is not greater than the word of God. If there's a dispute between the two, as Christians, we should always defer to the Bible. You know how many things they weren't able to prove are now proven true from the Bible? Just because they don't understand something doesn't mean that the Bible is automatically wrong.
@@tonyabrown7796 Heb 4:3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world. Heb 4:4 For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works. I do believe my English Bible, I do not know Hebrew or Greek, so I cannot read from the sources. I was thinking about this a little while ago, this is how they say stars are formed 1: compression, the shockwave of a supernova near a gas cloud compresses the gas enough for gravity to take over. 2: cooling, grains of dust enter the cloud cooling it enough to compress and gravity to take over. 3: collisions, such as two galaxies colliding and new stars forming along the collision front. Those are the three ways stars are said to be formed today, the problem is that it takes stars to make new ones, Go back to the Big Bang and there was no first generation of stars to make the second generation. I am going to add to this not knowing if it will be removed or not.
Fair Use Star Formation Neil DeGrasse Tyson said, "We Know the cloud wants to Collapse under its own weight to make one or more stars. but rotation as well as turbulent motion within the cloud work against that fate, so too does the ordinary gas pressure you learned about in High-school chemistry class, Galactic magnetic fields also fight collapse they penetrate the cloud and latch onto any free-roaming charged particles contained therein restricting the ways in which the cloud will respond to its self-gravity The scary part is that if none of us knew in advance that stars exist, front line research would offer plenty of convincing reasons for why stars could never form." [Neil DeGrasse Tyson, 2007, pg 107] Death by black hole and other cosmic quandaries. New York: w.w. Norton and co. Eva Novotny said, “The process by which an interstellar cloud is concentrated until it is held together gravitationally to become a protostar is not known.” [Eva Novotny. Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors, p. 279.] Martin Harwit said, “Literally hundreds of ideas on how stars are formed have been advanced in past decades. However, we are still far from any real solution.” [Martin Harwit, Astronomical Concepts, Second Edition. p.405.] Martin Harwit said, “The universe we see when we look out to its furthest horizons contains a hundred billion galaxies. Each of these galaxies contains another hundred billion stars. That’s 1022 stars all told. The silent embarrassment of modern astrophysics is that we do not know how even a single one of these stars managed to form. There’s no lack of ideas, of course. We just can’t substantiate them.” [Martin Harwit, Book Review in Science, 7 Match 1996, p. 1201-2] Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu said, “The origin of stars represents one of the most fundamental unsolved problems of contemporary astrophysics.” [Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu. The Formation of Sunllke Stars. Science, 4 May 1990, p. 564.] Ward D Thompson said, “The formation of stars is one of the most fundamental problems in astrophysics... No current model can reproduce all of the observations.” [Ward D Thompson, Isolated Star Formation: From Cloud Formation to Core Collapse, Science 4 January 2002: " Vol. 295. no. 5552, pp. 76 - 81.] V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, “The formation of galaxies and large-scale structure remains TMIUPIMA. . . "the most important unsolved problem in modern astrophysics.” [V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, Astrophysics in 2000, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113:1025-1114, 2001 September] Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell said, “Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It’s really remarkable.” [Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, "A Matter of Timing" Scientific American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p.30]
AIG ---Astronomers frequently report observations like this of “new stars” or “young stars,” which assume that these stars formed within the last few million years. Astronomers who believe the big bang and today’s other naturalistic origins theories would say stars can form in the present from clouds of dust and gas in space. Realize that no one saw these stars form. Instead, the properties of these stars, along with their location near gas and dust clouds where astronomers think that stars form is the basis for the belief that they are recently formed stars.
_ Instead, the properties of these stars, along with their location near gas and dust clouds where astronomers think that stars form is the basis for the belief that they are recently formed stars_ This is called "evidence". Something creationists will be unfamiliar with of course.
@@richardgregory3684 that's some weak evidence. You know what that is actually called? Assuming something to be true because it fits your narrative and yet has never been observed. That's why it isn't science at all. It is a guess at history based on the fact that you want it to be true.
@@inthelightofhisglory9614you've got some weak integrity. The fact that we see clouds of gas in space with objects all through the formation process is how we know stars form exactly how we think they do.
@@inthelightofhisglory9614 actually it's been observed thousands of times and there are hundreds of papers cataloging star forming regions. How is it possible that you're not aware of that?
I just read Deuteronomy 30:20 this morning and was struck by the stupendous statement about life: *20 loving the LORD your God, obeying his voice and holding fast to him, for he is your life and length of days, that you may dwell in the land that the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.* and *19 This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you **_life and death,_** blessings and curses. **_Now choose life,_** so that you and your children may live*
They've never actually observed stars forming. They simply see stars near clouds and assume the stars formed from the clouds. Ridiculous. God's word tells us when and how God created them.
@@all_bets_on_Ganesh the bible doesn't have science in it so to speak. It gives an overview of what we observe. Jesus said life is in the blood. Anything inaccurate about that statement?
Give them compassion also they are broken and don't have a clue why. God is not the author of confusion, which may help because they are confused and have probably been through serious trauma whether admitted or not. We are in a broken hopeless society and have basically been raised by nick at night and weekend cartoons as I was because my single mother had to work. We need to share the love and mercy of our LORD JESUS. It may save their lives and souls. They have heard they're wrong their whole life, they need love and truth and not just judgment. They need both sides yes but I pray we have mercy and compassion reaching people these days who have all been through so much. Love you all and thank you! Glory to God ❤
@@zerosteel0123but he's right though, I've never once spoken to a creationist with enough integrity to even accurately describe what the theory of evolution is let alone one that understands it.
Genesis 1:14:19 Then God said, "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth"; and it was so. 16 Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also. 17 God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth, 18 and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 So the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
If you are being hit hard its because you are, could be, would be, or will be very dangerous to tbe enemy and fruitful to my Father's kingdom. I pray those in Christ have their minds renewed , walk in the spirit, abound in the fruits of the spirit, and tbeir countenances shine as they should.
"If you are being hit hard its because you are, could be, would be, or will be very dangerous to tbe enemy and fruitful to my Father's kingdom." If it can be destroyed by the truth, it should be. Your problem is attachment to a fable. You sound like you couldn't take it if you had a methodology to determine the truth so you take a book at face value without thinking.. lazy lazy.
Today we have a lot of , so called, "intelligent robots", but the fact is - that's just a well programmed machines. Same analogy we can use explaining plants. Today we know that plants cane react to environmental challenges, can exchange reactions and experiences with each other, can trigger chemical response as defence against pets... But that's same as today's micro or nano robots can do (not so perfect, but...). So - that's not proof of intelligence, but it is proof of excellent design!
Design comes from intelligence. Not sure what you were trying to prove but you actually helped prove creation. There wouldn't be any AI without an intelligent mind behind it to make it do what it does.
Robert - to clarify my self - intelligent design= (very) intelligent Designer! I'm well educated in various fields of what we refer today as 'Sience'... All I got from those facts and principles is - there is a higher mind created ALL of this! I can't see any other explanation. And - yes! Of course I'm believer! Struggling to be Christian (follower of teaching of Jesus Christ, the son ofman and son of God), but have no intention to give up my struggle. I know I'm called, and I'll do my best to not disappoint my Lord!
It's kind of an unwritten rule to scientists that if you are a scientist working in whatever field, you don't go lecturing people or talking too much about other fields of science, fields in which you don't work. A scientist will often say, 'that's not my area, so I can't speak to that'.. Not these people :-) here we have people who I'm pretty sure have never worked with the James Webb Space Telescope. Remember, scientists work in specialized fields, just like doctors, and other professionals trained in whatever areas, so yeah, this is really odd.
"Gender reassignment surgery" is merely one of the many sins of the United States of Slootdom and Gohorra. The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah wasn't due *merely* to its depravity; it was its *consent/acceptance* of it. Hopefully the United States of Slootdom and Gohorrah wakes up before Apophis comes.
@@katamas832Utterly Malarkey. You are way out of touch that they are doing this on children as early of age 5. These poor children will not last long because the hormones always have to be taken. You're sad bro.
Biblically, we understand that God made the heaven, Earth, the sea, “and all that is in them” in six days (Exodus 20:11). This would include the stars. The Bible’s short timespan doesn’t allow time for stars to form out of condensed gas clouds, as the secular model requires. For instance, astronomers believe that a star like the sun requires 30 million years to form from a collapsing gas cloud. Furthermore, the Bible does not describe the origin of stars, sun, and the Earth in the same order as the secular model. Genesis 1 explains that the Earth was made three days before the sun and stars, while the secular model puts the sun and most stars first. Ken Ham
The bible is a bunch of hokum made up by iron age desert tribesmen who had no idea where the sun went at night. Many of the ludicrous tales are not even original, but stolen from other more advanced cultures and then re-written to accomodate the tribal wargod "Yahweh"
@@markduell2468 much to the contrary. The Bible can be trusted in all that it says. It is God's word. Not man's word. It is the unfolding revelation of an Almighty God.
@@SK-bw2cv It is loaded with scientific and historical errors. BTW, before you tell me I have not read it, I need to tell you I was a Bible believing, born again Christian for 25 years.
Using terms to compare humans, with animals, plants or even rocks is called: "Anthropomorphism!" Attributing human characteristics, likeness and similarities onto anything other than humans. "Oh, i wonder what Charlie the cat is thinking about me right now?" and when he looks at me that way and sighs, he reminds me of uncle Kenny so much"!😹
What do you think about the idea that when "He made the stars also" it means that he made the moving stars or the solar system with the sun and moon along with it?
Yeah, "God's word". 🙄 --------------------------------------------------------- *The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.*** *Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.*** ***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service. *"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"* *"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"* *"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"* ("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE." "Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.") *"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"* Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes. From a Biblical scholar: "Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."* *"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"* ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles. *"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* *"Hammurabi - World History Encyclopedia"* (Hammurabi (r. 1792-1750 BCE) was the sixth king of the Amorite First Dynasty of Babylon best known for his famous law code which served as the model for others, *including the Mosaic Law of the Bible.)* *"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"* *"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"* *"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"* (Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief) *"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"* *"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From? *"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"* Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica (Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years) *"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"* *"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"* *"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"* *"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"* *"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"* Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"* (8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science) *"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"* *"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"* *"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"* *"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"* *"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"* *"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei (This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies) *"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei
@@enumaelish6751 🙄 you repost this same thing every day on AIG videos. Not only is it too long to bother to even read, the small parts I did catch show nothing but deception. All one has to do is look up "the Bible is God's word," "why is the Bible God's word," "why we can trust the Bible".......and look up apologetics sites for the accusations made. No reason to doubt the Bible. Lol
@@enumaelish6751 🙄 you repost this same thing every day on AIG videos. Not only is it too long to bother to even read, the small parts I did catch show nothing but deception.
@@enumaelish6751 there are plenty of Christian channels and sites that refute everything you're staying but I don't have 12 hours to waste my time doing it.
Y'all should contact some of these families and do what you're pointing out that others haven't done, record them, and them provide it to us. - if resources permit of course.
6:35 Sounds more like desperate attempt to make money via a controversial scientific theory,maybe we need to pray for that guy’s financial situation that he would find God though His miraculous provisions 🤔👍
It describes the difference between a process by which natural laws can produce stars and the idea that all stars were made supernaturally on day 4 of creation. It’s not really related to evolution it the Darwin sense.
@@justinpeterburford I see. However, it seems the hosts were implying that if people believe stars formed naturally, then they are neo-Darwinists. This is similar to the assertion that atheists must believe in the Big Bang simply because they are atheists, which isn't necessarily true. An atheist is someone who doesn't believe in God, and this disbelief isn't inherently linked to naturalism, although it often correlates.
@luish1498 good old creationist strawman. "If we call anyone who understands any field of science an evolutionist we can dismis them for having a weak argument"
@katamas832 so Christianity in the root meaning is a follower of Jeshua. I aggree there are many different groups in the umbrella of Christianity but the fundamental part of it is Jeshua came to earth to try to teach the humans to turn away from sin.they inevitably did not. The jews thought the Messiah was coming to literally free them from roman occupation. That was not the case. Jeshua taught that to be free from sin is the freedom that they were after. Then thus after the sin was gone they could be with God again. They turned from him thus there needed to be a payment for the sins of the world. The only payment worthy enough would be a completely sinless being. So Jeshua being who he is freely gave his human body up as payment. Idk if you have read any of the bible. John 3 16 says for God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son. For so whoever believes in him ( jeshua) will have everlasting life. That is the Christianity truth i speak of.
@@ooelectronoo Got you, I was a bit confused. Happens, don't worry. Well, that does sound pretty good in the way that you described it. If that's all, I might be willing to be a Christian knowing that Christianity is true. But what bugs me is, this isn't all of it, is it? I think what sin is, what the consequence of sin is, and whether or not a human could ever hope to help to not sin, and whether or not that is even their fault, is sort of left out. From my understanding, sin is disobeying the rules set by God, with the punishment being eternal existance in torment for even any one sin, with the rules being set up so that even some natural, biological reactions from a person is considered a sin, and most people don't even know something is a sin before they commit it. To me, it seems like we are set up for failure and are blamed for it, and expected to accept that. It doesn't sit well with me. Nothing would stop me from acknowledging the existance of God and Jesus if Christianity were true, but to be a Christian, I would have some reserves.
@@katamas832can we get out of TH-cam comments and talk about this I really like talking with people about why they don't like, follow or even believe in God. It helps me understand them more.
@katamas832 I would really like to continue this conversation but would like to tak it off TH-cam comments. We Don't have to call one another, emailing would work fine. If not we can stay on here. So if I understand it correctly is that you have a hard time with the fact that we are all sinners and fall short of the glory of God. Who do you base your morality off. Is it your own scale or society. Or is there an ultimate authority which states what is right and wrong. If it is your self or society that it's based upon than you have no moral authority saying Adolf Hitlyer was wrong. Or Mao or staling or any dictator who has killed his on people. The only way for a objective morality to be is for objective moral being to be. That being cannot be confined by this world. Because than it would be merely subjective again. Every human sins not because they are bad people, it is because we are human and we were given free will. Thus with our meeger 3# brain we are easily confused by the devil. Now it you follow God and have a shield given by the holy spirit you can defend against the devil. So I read your comment more. So what part of everyone sins and falls short of God's glory is troubling to you.it is true that you are not held to the transgressions of your father but you are for your own. God wants us to live in peace. No fighting, love one man or woman, marriage is between a man and woman. And be fruitful and multiply. Don't listen to what the devil wants you to do.
As a muslim i like love watching your show muslims are also creationist ...in the quran King Soloman/we call him a prophet of God.God gave him the understanding the language of animals ..there is a beautiful passage on him on his way to sheba with his army ..and a female amt warns the other ants to get into their holes for fear of the army trampling them to death..and Soloman smiled ..also had language of birds ...the Hoepoo that was under his subjugation saw flew to the people of Sheba pagans who had a queen (sheba )and was on her way with her army to see Soloman with gifts so they would not war them .soloman also had jinn (creation before humans created from smokeless fire )family of satan,..they still all around us my take on Aliens is that its Jinn fooling the evolutionists to think they come fom somewhere out there when they have always been here ..they also have free will just like us..they can live for thousands of years .also have famalies and also different religions just like up ..my point about Jinn is some of them also worked for Soloman (peace and blessings be on him)they built his palaces ...Christians and muslims are brothers ....made in the image of God dont mean to muslims that we look like God ..we see it as how God saw fit how to make us ...Satan was very highbup with God because he believed in God so whenever God created something he invited Satan to dwell in thecrealm of the angels ..and all God day to a new creation is "Be"and it is ..when God created Adam Satan was predent ..when god said to the angels bow down tobmy new creation they all did except Satan ...the first show of arrogance..Angels have no sex and have no free will .so there is no such thing as fallen angels ..the fallen angel in Christianity was Satan ..he refused to bow down to Adam ..said to God you made him fom mus and yoi made me from fire ..i am better than him ..Jinn can also shift shape ..into snakes humans and dogs some of them can fly just like ...proper name( Ifrit )...who woeked for Prophet Soloman..he brought Shebas throne to him in a blink of and eye before she even arrived there ...i can go on and on ..but after 1am here need some sleep ...for those who are intersted read the storiesxof the propheys of old ..the truth about their lives isxall in the Quran..keep and open mind ..i come from a catholic tradition ..but found all the questions i asked my Priest about things in the bible that i use to query (all i was told is to have faith )....coulnt live on blind faith ...from a very early age ...things that did not make logical sense to me ..got all my answers when i finally and reluctantly when i read the english translation of the Quran!..even the story of Mother Mary and the virgin birth ...a whole chapter dedicated to her called surah (chapter)Maryam...Mary..most beatiful story to read ..gives you the genealogy and about everyday life of people of those days .. .....
So if plants are conscious does that mean they will stop everyone from eating veg also. Veg have rights also. A lot of adverts on TV now seem to be replacing talking animals with talking veg. What will we eat then probably something reminiscent to the slop they ate on The Matrix and/or maybe flavoured pills.
For Pete's sake, Genesis says KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL came from a PLANT. Jonah was devastated when his plant died. I had a grapefruit plant I really liked. Jesus said, I AM THE VINE. He was the Root of Jesse. The prophets frequently anthropomorphize plants. If the rocks will cry out, how much more plants?
Nah, I think you are wrong. Plants often cover a more profound meaning in the scripture. For instance, the fig tree is a symbolism of Israel. Jesus cursed a the fig tree for he found no fruit on it. Also, God cursed Jonah’s tree to teach him a lesson about love and care. The bush is a representation of accusation. The burning bush is under judgement and yet it is not condemned because the fire does not consume it. I think the scripture is far more interesting and deeper than mere anthropomorphism
@@alexanderseton Wrong about what? I agree that the fig tree is symbolic. That doesn't preclude the tree being, at some level (its own level, not ours), sentient.
There is not such thing as "space" in the first place, so that´s all you need to know. Earth is not globe, there was not Big Bang, not evolution, there are not "aliens" (only demons / shape-shifters who pretending to be ones), etc. You´re welcome, thank me later. Check my playlists.
I believe got made the stars on Day One, and on Day Four God "placed' the stars the moo and the sun. If you want to see why I believe that, search for Pastor Allen Nolan Genesis series part 6 of the series. He's going to the original source, and using scripture to reinforce his case
"Plants aren't really alive in that sense"... 🤔 have you ever grown anything? Air circulation is an incredibly important factor, without proper circulation, plants welt and die.
@@zerosteel0123 the majority of the world says your religion does not have enough proof because if you did then why are there less believers every year
3:03 to 3:51 Assuming gas clouds collapse into stars? No, we don't assume gas clouds collapse into stars, we know they collapse into stars based on how gravity works and we can calculate it and saying that they can't collapse in to stars because "gas want's to expand" is just not true. If giant gas clouds with the mass 333,000+ Earths can't collapse into stars because the pressure would over power gravity then Earth couldn't even hope to have enough mass to hold on to it's atmosphere.
“Evolutionists” don’t have an opinion on star formation. That would be astronomers. So, someone who won’t even read the paper and someone else who is also not an astronomer are telling us that the evolutionists are wrong about astronomy. Yeah, right. Make that make sense.
People are so stupid they no longer know how to find nourishment and food, that plant knows how to find it which means it is smarter than people. It's a matter of perspective like you were talking earlier
Plants can die so we need to know they are just as alive as we are. Oh, my computer died last night too. I suppose we should have a funeral and mourn. Oh wait...it's a METAPHOR. Plug it back in!
Did you think that humanity was the only chosen species in all of the 4.5 billion year day 7 of creation? Humanist religions are not in communion with God, but are falling victim to the adversary's divisive psyops
🌵"Plants ☘️...Having...Conversations ??? 😶....Soooo... what's next ??? Does this mean that (🥩 Kitchen Poultry 🍳🍗) will start having private meetings to form a (Union) ??? 😶
@zerosteel0123 the bible is the best source of reminding us why we should read a science book, or an ethics book, a history book, a book on logic and reason, a book on astronomy or cosmology, definitely some books on biology and chemistry, some physics, human physiology is a good one, engineering basics are great. Even some boating.....minimal knowledge of boating will very quickly destroy Noah's ark for you once you realize that within minutes without proper steering it would turn broadside and capsize in the waves.... The bible is a fantastic example of why you should actually go and learn things in the real world.
They say the Universe began with a big bang Yet no one can say why it began They search for the cause that started all things Not willing to accept the Person of God Who structured the laws that govern all things They continue in vain to search for a cause I look at the Heavens and the Order there in The Wonder and Beauty Displayed God’s Knowledge and Wisdom cannot be measured He who dwells in the Eternal Now The Great “I AM” Why did God Create the Universe and all there IN? That His Glory may be Revealed and His Love Within
"They say the Universe began with a big bang" As your fable began incorrectly, so did you here. Georges Lemaître a Catholic priest proposed the idea. Basically you are upside down on this whole thing. "His Glory may be Revealed and His Love Within" We know (because it has been measured) that the VAST majority of the universe as a whole is INSTANTLY deadly to all forms of life. Is that love in your book? LOL
@@frosted1030 We know (because it has been measured ) What is the essence of energy? Energy is the means by which the Law takes effect. Any time the law acts energy is manifested. Law and Energy are both created by a Sovereign God, who out of His Love has placed us in this vast Universe where we can survive and witness His LOVE and GLORY. Yet we want to destroy it.
@@allanpeter3125 "What is the essence of energy?" Which type of energy would you like to discuss? Kinetic, potential, chemical, thermal, electrical, electrochemical, electromagnetic, sonic, or nuclear? Don't think you prepared with this argument from ignorance fallacy. " Any time the law acts energy is manifested." That is not the way we define physical laws. A law states how something behaves under specific conditions. This is not something magical, arbitrary, or unmeasured. " Law and Energy are both created by a Sovereign God" That's a wild claim, you need some sort of very strong support now. Let's start by specifically defining your imaginary friend and forming a predictive model. If you run away now, use vague terms, or have no idea what we are discussing, your assertion fails. "who out of His Love has placed us in this vast Universe" No, that was your mother. "Yet we want to destroy it." If it can be destroyed by the truth, it should be.
@@frosted1030 The classical definition of energy:" Energy is that which when possessed by a body gives it the capacity to do work or changes the state of the body". Note, (Is that which) No one knows what is the Nature/Substance of Energy. All what you have mentioned is the manifestation of energy in different forms.
@@allanpeter3125 " The classical definition of energy:" Energy is that which when possessed by a body gives it the capacity to do work or changes the state of the body" Again, specifically what type of energy are we discussing? Or is vagary in order to distract your tactic here? "All what you have mentioned is the manifestation of energy in different forms." We have specific definitions and they are all measured, and understood. It's like you really want to make broad generalizations about topics with no clue, and quickly move on. Specify the type of energy, if you can.
31 And behold, the glory of the Lord was upon Moses, so that Moses stood in the presence of God, and talked with him face to face. And the Lord God said unto Moses: For mine own purpose have I made these things. Here is wisdom and it remaineth in me. 32 And by the word of my power, have I created them, which is mine Only Begotten Son, who is full of grace and truth. 33 And worlds without number have I created; and I also created them for mine own purpose; and by the Son I created them, which is mine Only Begotten. 34 And the first man of all men have I called Adam, which is many. 35 But only an account of this earth, and the inhabitants thereof, give I unto you. For behold, there are many worlds that have passed away by the word of my power. And there are many that now stand, and innumerable are they unto man; but all things are numbered unto me, for they are mine and I know them. 36 And it came to pass that Moses spake unto the Lord, saying: Be merciful unto thy servant, O God, and tell me concerning this earth, and the inhabitants thereof, and also the heavens, and then thy servant will be content. 37 And the Lord God spake unto Moses, saying: The heavens, they are many, and they cannot be numbered unto man; but they are numbered unto me, for they are mine. 38 And as one earth shall pass away, and the heavens thereof even so shall another come; and there is no end to my works, neither to my words. 39 For behold, this is my work and my glory-to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man. 40 And now, Moses, my son, I will speak unto thee concerning this earth upon which thou standest; and thou shalt write the things which I shall speak. 41 And in a day when the children of men shall esteem my words as naught and take many of them from the book which thou shalt write, behold, I will raise up another like unto thee; and they shall be had again among the children of men-among as many as shall believe. Moses 1
Why would an "evolutionist" be concerned with cosmology and the physics of star formation? AiG is, as usual, flailing around attacking any science any way it can and then claiming this somehow invalidates evolutionary theory.
Arguing in the alternative, a lawyer's tactic, let's say these stars are being formed in the manner they think. So what? Adam and Eve were specific creations and the rest of us are the result of natural processes God created; if stars ARE being formed by natural processes, that would also be by natural processes established by He who created scientific laws.
I always thought it wouldn't be against His nature to make stars repopulate themselves, like He did with living things. However, in recorded history, the difference is that He specifically said for living things to reproduce themselves. He did not say that for stars. Not to mention, given the age of the universe, we wouldn't even be able to see stars form if He did design them to do so. And that in itself would be in His nature, to let us witness something spectacular like that if He did choose to design stars to do that.
@@TheartofThorns I agree. I do not think we could handle knowing everything He knows so its possible He did set a process in motion for star death and star birth; however, our existence is so short, we could not possibly, reasonably see enough of it on this side of eternity to be certain of what is going on.
Stars are lights in the firmament that will fall to earth in the end time. It would be awesome if Answers in Genesis would actually get some answers from Genesis. Genesis 1 is literal history.
We could ask the same about evolutionists...but they never actually do, do they?....they just blatantly ignore all the huge problems with the faulty theory.... I can show you a great resource if you want... A video where Dr. James tour talks about some massive issues with evolution.
@@janickgonzalez8900 there are no issues with evolution Janick, it’s a fully resolved scientific theory which has been tested and shown to be correct consistently over and over. The only people who find issues with it are people who go into it with preconceived ideas and use spurious arguments.
Argumentum ad verecundiam is not an argument. Anybody with his background can understand the claim of astrophysicists regarding these phenomena. Empirical evidence would be nice, but we don't have that. Which astrophysicists would you believe? They don't all agree about much of anything in cosomogony.
I’m 100% Christian. I disagree with your premises on plants based on scripture. There are so many indications of plants having consciousness. Of course it’s not the same level of humans. But several people testify after death encounters with Heaven speak about plants having awareness and worship God.
Bible got creation order wrong. The earth was not created before the stars."Genesis's creation narrative is divided into seven days, with God creating light on the first day, the sky on the second, the earth, seas, and vegetation on the third, the sun and moon on the fourth, "
I think you can make an argument that when it says "God created the Heavens and the Earth," this included making the universe, stars, solar system, etc. prior to actual "day 1" of creation, when the earth was just a void like the other planets we observe.
@contra-mundum-94-bc3pu why the specificity of 7 days with specific things on each day? Deliberately confusing with multiple interpretations making it factually worthless?
@@richardkatz8713 I think to say that because something has multiple interpretations that makes it "factually worthless" is a stretch. There are plenty of historical documents that have various interpretations by scholars that still give insight into historical views about x,y, or z. Making it a zero sum game is rather simplistic. Second, the specifics of 7 days is in relation to God's activity AFTER the earth was formed. This to me is rather obvious since the text says " God made the heavens and the earth, and the earth...." Notice that the heavens and Earth are made, then the text turns to the earth. Stars be formed along with "the heavens" at the beginning make sense if we consider the question of how there was light before there was the sun (see Day 4). I've never heard great answers from those who insist the sun was made on day 4, instead of appeared on day 4. There's whole articles about that.
@@richardkatz8713 Are you trying to suggest that nothing that gives information needs to be interpreted? Really? So what about the photos from James Webb? There's no possible way that scientists might interpret the information from those photos differently? If anything requires interpretation then it's worthless? Yes, that's a ridiculous standard.
I have looked into the echo chamber and i am not happy with what i have seen. Charles bless anyone that reads this and may your genetic material be passed on through evolution.
@@katamas832 well let's put it another way. We really don't care about your opinion of us. Or what we believe. We believe in Jesus. We believe God's word is true and your opinion of it is meaningless. That better?
Dude, what are you talking about? It only does if you take it at face value....is it wise to take EVERYTHING in the Bible at face value? Absolutely not....go check out Dr. Hugh Ross.
I’m curious… are any Christian YEC bothered by the dishonesty Answers in Genesis employs by referring to everybody they disagree with on any scientific subject as “evolutionists”?
Anyone who believes in Evolution as their foundation of life and truth, is an Evolutionist. I guess the term evolutionist is used somewhat loosely; it used to refer to someone who either studied/studies or teaches evolution. Most people who believe in evolution aren’t actual scientists but rather have a belief in evolutionism, which is just another form of man-made religion; a religion void of spiritualism but purely based on naturalism and humanism.
They tend to say naturalist meaning they believe everything emerged through natural means. The terms secularist, naturalist, Darwinist, and evolutionist are used interchangeably by religious and non-religious people to usually refer to people who support the government, public education, and public university view or narrative.
Not at all. It's the just a way to differentiate between scientists who believe creation and scientists who believe evolution. Why would that bother me?
@@captivedesk3168 People can study multiple subjects not just one. There is nothing stopping a cosmologist from learning biology and there is nothing stopping a biologist from learning cosmology. One doesn't have to have a PhD in Biology to talk about biology and one doesn't have to have a PhD in Cosmology to talk about Cosmology.
@@JCAbhishek you dont understand, Rocket Rob said evolutionists...big bang, biologists do not study the big bang, cosmologists do not study evolution. The study of the universe is cosmology not biology.
Sure, as if that is the reason you're here. More like, you know that you will answer to the real God, and you won't be getting a second chance on your imaginary wheel of creation - sounds like a game show.
@@teslasnek Any time I hear a creationist has a PhD it is either at some sham Creationist college, OR the work they did in their research has NOTHING to do with creationism. With that said, credentials don't make you a scientist. Having a respect for evidence does.
You know popular science that you absorb through osmosis. The narratives in science change all the time, that's how science works. So what you think is true today might be proved wrong tomorrow..
if Albert Einstein believed the bible, why did he think the Universe was 13.8 billion years old. Before Albert, everyone assumed that the Universe was 16 billion years old. hopefully, this makes sense did everyone just go with his famous math problem and go nuts with it?
@@johngallo1988 Yes you are wrong. His parents were Jewish (though non-believers), he attended a Catholic _school_ and was briefly religious, but abandoned religion by the age of 12.
Okay, here's the thing that got me confused over the past month of research. Creationists do not dispute the "size" of the universe, only the age of the universe. But there are two big problems with that. If indeed the edge is at least 13 billion light years away, then for the light to have gotten to us at the moment of Creation would have required a Godly intervention and extraordinary, almost incalculable increase in the speed of light. But for us to calculate the speed of light accurately now, would have required it to slow down. If in fact the light "slowed down" then we would when we looked at the nighttime sky now, see huge patches of sky with no stars in them at all, because the "present day" light would have not reached us yet.
Why don't you take a trip to some creationist websites? There's plenty of them. AIG has articles on it. I don't understand why people ask questions like this on their YT channel but never explore their website.
@@inthelightofhisglory9614 I have spent the last 40 days doing research, "including" AiG and CRI. I have read and lsiened to the "official" explanation of the creation of the universe, and am perfectly willing to entertain the notion that creation only took 6 days. That is not the issue. The issue is coming up with a plausible "explanation" for all the processes taking only 4-6 thousand years.
Check out the "Starlight in Time" book by Russell Humphrey PhD. He studied gravity here on earth and offer up a theory based on the empirical science found.
@@cnex101 LOL, it's laughable nonsense that attempts to bend the evidence to fit with a ridiculous story about a magical cosmic wizard written by iron age desert tribesmen
Lol what a joke this show is. Like actually... hi I'm dr so and so, I didn't even read this cause it doesn't agree with the Bible. What kinda Dr are you? My guess your not a dr and you actually attended some kinda church based colleges with no accredited programs but ok your a dr who doesn't read if it's not a Bible. And agree with guy above, more likes then views😂
Your comment would be worthwhile, if you addressed any of the evidence for the things you felt they didn't read, or that shows their doctorates are invalid.
@@litigioussociety4249or if he could show he is a doctor himself. Wouldn't make much sense to be criticizing someone for not being a doctor if you're not a doctor. Lol
Or, being a doctor is not necessary to have common sense or have critical thinking, especially with the failure that is most if not all schooling in America and other countries.
@@zerosteel011 You don't need to have a doctorate to criticize someone on a subject; I've heard people with PhDs say incredibly stupid things. There's also people who are a doctor in a different subject, and takr advantage of people assuming they're a doctor in the topic being discussed; for example, several media people thought Jill Biden was a medical doctor a few years ago, because she kept calling herself Dr. Jill Biden when discussing Covid.
![⭐ฮิตในTikTok!! ( มะมะมะหมูเด้ง MooDeng ) Ver. แดนซ์ ReMix BY [ ดีเจกิต รีมิกซ์ ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4noyAoMa7bQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Watch you everytime you're on...Thank you...
John 17:17 - Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth.
Matthew 24:35 - Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.
Colossians 3:16 - Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God.
Luke 11:28 - But he said, “Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it!”
Isaiah 40:8 - The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever.
Worship the creation instead of the creator, I believe the Bible says those people have debased minds
Amen
God thundereth marvellously with his voice; great things doeth he, which we cannot comprehend.
A poem?
@@JesusistheonetrueGod Job 37:5
@@soberandwatching Ah
@@JesusistheonetrueGod Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.
Amen
Tell the truth, AIG! Keep exposing the darkness 🙏🙏🙏
Trees make great houses. Grains make yummy flour. Berries make great jams. Yeah, I can respect plants for that. 😊
Trees DON'T make houses. Grains DON'T make flour. Berries DON'T make jams. PEOPLE make houses, flour, and jams. Sensible people know this and respect the Creator first and then people, never plants. Are you one of those empty-minded individuals who also think that "guns" kill people? By the logic you have presented in your comment, you must be. News Flash for you: Guns DON'T kill people. People kill people. Your profile name really needs to be changed. You obviously do not know anything about critical thinking. Just saying. Trust the Lord Jesus Christ and He will not only save you but help you to escape the state of confusion you are living in.
Psa 147:4 He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.
Gen 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
Gen 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
No more new stars to be created, that work of creation was ended on the 6th day of creation, maybe the scientists are aware of this and are desperate to find new stars forming, so they can find accusation.
You make a good argument. I wonder though, does it mean there won't be new stars? He ended creation with only 2 humans and now there are billions yet he can still number the hairs on our head. Maybe when new stars form he gives them a new name. I am skeptikal of this on scientific grounds. Have ypu ever looked at the original bible translation of those passages?
@@tonyabrown7796 we don't interpret the Bible to fit science. Science is not greater than the word of God. If there's a dispute between the two, as Christians, we should always defer to the Bible. You know how many things they weren't able to prove are now proven true from the Bible? Just because they don't understand something doesn't mean that the Bible is automatically wrong.
@@tonyabrown7796 if your dispute is between the Bible and science, it isn't the Bible that is wrong. Science isn't equal to God's word.
@@tonyabrown7796
Heb 4:3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.
Heb 4:4 For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.
I do believe my English Bible, I do not know Hebrew or Greek, so I cannot read from the sources.
I was thinking about this a little while ago, this is how they say stars are formed
1: compression, the shockwave of a supernova near a gas cloud compresses the gas enough for gravity to take over.
2: cooling, grains of dust enter the cloud cooling it enough to compress and gravity to take over.
3: collisions, such as two galaxies colliding and new stars forming along the collision front.
Those are the three ways stars are said to be formed today, the problem is that it takes stars to make new ones,
Go back to the Big Bang and there was no first generation of stars to make the second generation.
I am going to add to this not knowing if it will be removed or not.
Fair Use
Star Formation
Neil DeGrasse Tyson said, "We Know the cloud wants to Collapse under its own weight to make one or more stars. but rotation as well as turbulent motion within the cloud work against that fate, so too does the ordinary gas pressure you learned about in High-school chemistry class, Galactic magnetic fields also fight collapse they penetrate the cloud and latch onto any free-roaming charged particles contained therein restricting the ways in which the cloud will respond to its self-gravity The scary part is that if none of us knew in advance that stars exist, front line research would offer plenty of convincing reasons for why stars could never form." [Neil DeGrasse Tyson, 2007, pg 107]
Death by black hole and other cosmic quandaries. New York: w.w. Norton and co.
Eva Novotny said, “The process by which an interstellar cloud is concentrated until it is held together gravitationally to become a protostar is not known.” [Eva Novotny. Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors, p. 279.]
Martin Harwit said, “Literally hundreds of ideas on how stars are formed have been advanced in past decades. However, we are still far from any real solution.” [Martin Harwit, Astronomical Concepts, Second Edition. p.405.]
Martin Harwit said, “The universe we see when we look out to its furthest horizons contains a hundred billion galaxies. Each of these galaxies contains another hundred billion stars. That’s 1022 stars all told. The silent embarrassment of modern astrophysics is that we do not know how even a single one of these stars managed to form. There’s no lack of ideas, of course. We just can’t substantiate them.” [Martin Harwit, Book Review in Science, 7 Match 1996, p. 1201-2]
Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu said, “The origin of stars represents one of the most fundamental unsolved problems of contemporary astrophysics.” [Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu. The Formation of Sunllke Stars. Science, 4 May 1990, p. 564.]
Ward D Thompson said, “The formation of stars is one of the most fundamental problems in astrophysics... No current model can reproduce all of the observations.” [Ward D Thompson, Isolated Star Formation: From Cloud Formation to Core Collapse, Science 4 January 2002: " Vol. 295. no. 5552, pp. 76 - 81.]
V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, “The formation of galaxies and large-scale structure remains TMIUPIMA. . . "the most important unsolved problem in modern astrophysics.” [V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, Astrophysics in 2000, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113:1025-1114, 2001 September]
Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell said, “Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It’s really remarkable.” [Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, "A Matter of Timing" Scientific American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p.30]
05:00 Amen 🙌
AIG ---Astronomers frequently report observations like this of “new stars” or “young stars,” which assume that these stars formed within the last few million years. Astronomers who believe the big bang and today’s other naturalistic origins theories would say stars can form in the present from clouds of dust and gas in space. Realize that no one saw these stars form. Instead, the properties of these stars, along with their location near gas and dust clouds where astronomers think that stars form is the basis for the belief that they are recently formed stars.
_ Instead, the properties of these stars, along with their location near gas and dust clouds where astronomers think that stars form is the basis for the belief that they are recently formed stars_
This is called "evidence". Something creationists will be unfamiliar with of course.
@@richardgregory3684 that's some weak evidence. You know what that is actually called? Assuming something to be true because it fits your narrative and yet has never been observed.
That's why it isn't science at all. It is a guess at history based on the fact that you want it to be true.
@@inthelightofhisglory9614you've got some weak integrity.
The fact that we see clouds of gas in space with objects all through the formation process is how we know stars form exactly how we think they do.
@@Gek1177 but it isn't observed. You've never seen it happen. It's a nice guess but we have a better answer.
@@inthelightofhisglory9614 actually it's been observed thousands of times and there are hundreds of papers cataloging star forming regions.
How is it possible that you're not aware of that?
Thanks for that great explanation.
I just read Deuteronomy 30:20 this morning and was struck by the stupendous statement about life:
*20 loving the LORD your God, obeying his voice and holding fast to him, for he is your life and length of days, that you may dwell in the land that the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.*
and *19 This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you **_life and death,_** blessings and curses. **_Now choose life,_** so that you and your children may live*
They've never actually observed stars forming. They simply see stars near clouds and assume the stars formed from the clouds. Ridiculous.
God's word tells us when and how God created them.
Have to correct you there. God only tells us when he created stars, not how. That type of info would be amazing.
@@DarrylSteele69 God lets us know the activating agent, though. His spoken word. Every little detail is not there but we do know that much.
@@zerosteel0123 yes, you're correct. I'm thinking more detail. All good.
If we got our science from the bible we would still be sleeping in caves and drawing straws for who is on lion watch for the night.
@@all_bets_on_Ganesh the bible doesn't have science in it so to speak. It gives an overview of what we observe. Jesus said life is in the blood. Anything inaccurate about that statement?
Give them compassion also they are broken and don't have a clue why. God is not the author of confusion, which may help because they are confused and have probably been through serious trauma whether admitted or not. We are in a broken hopeless society and have basically been raised by nick at night and weekend cartoons as I was because my single mother had to work. We need to share the love and mercy of our LORD JESUS. It may save their lives and souls. They have heard they're wrong their whole life, they need love and truth and not just judgment. They need both sides yes but I pray we have mercy and compassion reaching people these days who have all been through so much. Love you all and thank you! Glory to God ❤
If God isn't the author of confusion then why is the AiG audience so confused about science?
@@Gek1177 science isn't God, brother. There are some things science will never discover. God knows a lot more than we do.
@@i7Qp4rQjust because you don't understand it and are unwilling to learn about reality doesn't make it false.
@@Johnny_Eh-theist just because you commented doesn't make it true
@@zerosteel0123but he's right though, I've never once spoken to a creationist with enough integrity to even accurately describe what the theory of evolution is let alone one that understands it.
When I went to school evolution was a field of biology, while star formation was an aspect of astrophysics - but then I didn't skip science.
Genesis 1:14:19
Then God said, "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth"; and it was so. 16 Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also. 17 God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth, 18 and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 So the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
If you are being hit hard its because you are, could be, would be, or will be very dangerous to tbe enemy and fruitful to my Father's kingdom. I pray those in Christ have their minds renewed , walk in the spirit, abound in the fruits of the spirit, and tbeir countenances shine as they should.
"If you are being hit hard its because you are, could be, would be, or will be very dangerous to tbe enemy and fruitful to my Father's kingdom." If it can be destroyed by the truth, it should be. Your problem is attachment to a fable. You sound like you couldn't take it if you had a methodology to determine the truth so you take a book at face value without thinking.. lazy lazy.
Today we have a lot of , so called, "intelligent robots", but the fact is - that's just a well programmed machines.
Same analogy we can use explaining plants.
Today we know that plants cane react to environmental challenges, can exchange reactions and experiences with each other, can trigger chemical response as defence against pets... But that's same as today's micro or nano robots can do (not so perfect, but...).
So - that's not proof of intelligence, but it is proof of excellent design!
Design comes from intelligence. Not sure what you were trying to prove but you actually helped prove creation.
There wouldn't be any AI without an intelligent mind behind it to make it do what it does.
Robert - to clarify my self - intelligent design= (very) intelligent Designer!
I'm well educated in various fields of what we refer today as 'Sience'... All I got from those facts and principles is - there is a higher mind created ALL of this!
I can't see any other explanation.
And - yes! Of course I'm believer!
Struggling to be Christian (follower of teaching of Jesus Christ, the son ofman and son of God), but have no intention to give up my struggle.
I know I'm called, and I'll do my best to not disappoint my Lord!
@@mibict thank you for clarifying yourself. I wasn't too sure what you were trying to say. That's awesome!
@@RobertA-up9ur Thank You for your reply!
Hope to see you (in this life or next one).
thanks so much for this series
It's kind of an unwritten rule to scientists that if you are a scientist working in whatever field, you don't go lecturing people or talking too much about other fields of science, fields in which you don't work. A scientist will often say, 'that's not my area, so I can't speak to that'..
Not these people :-) here we have people who I'm pretty sure have never worked with the James Webb Space Telescope.
Remember, scientists work in specialized fields, just like doctors, and other professionals trained in whatever areas, so yeah, this is really odd.
@@Mario_Sky_521 no, that's not really what I'm saying. nvm
Gender reassignment surgery especially in a young person is akin to lap band surgery for the anorexic
"Gender reassignment surgery" is merely one of the many sins of the United States of Slootdom and Gohorra.
The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah wasn't due *merely* to its depravity; it was its *consent/acceptance* of it.
Hopefully the United States of Slootdom and Gohorrah wakes up before Apophis comes.
"In a young person" ya'll love to ignore the fact that for 99.99% of cases, the person in question is above 18, with some odd cases of 16-17.
@@katamas832Utterly Malarkey. You are way out of touch that they are doing this on children as early of age 5. These poor children will not last long because the hormones always have to be taken. You're sad bro.
@@Alec_Cox Not a single 5 year old has underwent surgery as part of gender affirming care. That's a bold face lie.
Biblically, we understand that God made the heaven, Earth, the sea, “and all that is in them” in six days (Exodus 20:11). This would include the stars.
The Bible’s short timespan doesn’t allow time for stars to form out of condensed gas clouds, as the secular model requires. For instance, astronomers believe that a star like the sun requires 30 million years to form from a collapsing gas cloud. Furthermore, the Bible does not describe the origin of stars, sun, and the Earth in the same order as the secular model. Genesis 1 explains that the Earth was made three days before the sun and stars, while the secular model puts the sun and most stars first. Ken Ham
The bible is a bunch of hokum made up by iron age desert tribesmen who had no idea where the sun went at night. Many of the ludicrous tales are not even original, but stolen from other more advanced cultures and then re-written to accomodate the tribal wargod "Yahweh"
The problem is the Bible is dead wrong about so many things.
@@markduell2468 much to the contrary. The Bible can be trusted in all that it says. It is God's word. Not man's word. It is the unfolding revelation of an Almighty God.
@@SK-bw2cv It is loaded with scientific and historical errors. BTW, before you tell me I have not read it, I need to tell you I was a Bible believing, born again Christian for 25 years.
@@markduell2468 so now I guess this is when you proceeded to try to show me errors in the Bible? Give it your best shot.
Right on dude. Please share more old stuff.
Using terms to compare humans, with animals, plants or even rocks is called: "Anthropomorphism!" Attributing human characteristics, likeness and similarities onto anything other than humans. "Oh, i wonder what Charlie the cat is thinking about me right now?" and when he looks at me that way and sighs, he reminds me of uncle Kenny so much"!😹
What do you think about the idea that when "He made the stars also" it means that he made the moving stars or the solar system with the sun and moon along with it?
The Big Bust theory is not compatible with the Bible. People need to stop trying to mix the two.
I love that she said the reason why a baby should be born "Because was created in the image of God, and it doesn't matter what she/he becomes"
God's word is always greater than the word of man.
Yeah, "God's word". 🙄
---------------------------------------------------------
*The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.***
*Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.***
***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service.
*"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"*
*"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"*
*"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"*
("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE."
"Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.")
*"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"*
Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes.
From a Biblical scholar:
"Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."*
*"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"*
------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, look up the below articles.
*"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"*
*"Hammurabi - World History Encyclopedia"*
(Hammurabi (r. 1792-1750 BCE) was the sixth king of the Amorite First Dynasty of Babylon best known for his famous law code which served as the model for others, *including the Mosaic Law of the Bible.)*
*"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"*
*"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"*
*"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"*
(Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief)
*"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"*
*"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From?
*"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"*
Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica
(Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years)
*"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"*
*"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"*
*"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"*
*"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"*
*"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"*
Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"*
(8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science)
*"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"*
*"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"*
*"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"*
*"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"*
*"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"*
*"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei
(This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies)
*"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei
*"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei
@@enumaelish6751 🙄 you repost this same thing every day on AIG videos. Not only is it too long to bother to even read, the small parts I did catch show nothing but deception. All one has to do is look up "the Bible is God's word," "why is the Bible God's word," "why we can trust the Bible".......and look up apologetics sites for the accusations made. No reason to doubt the Bible. Lol
@@enumaelish6751 🙄 you repost this same thing every day on AIG videos. Not only is it too long to bother to even read, the small parts I did catch show nothing but deception.
@@enumaelish6751 there are plenty of Christian channels and sites that refute everything you're staying but I don't have 12 hours to waste my time doing it.
@@christtheonlyhope4578aka the bible is God's word because the bible says it's God's word...good old circular reasoning...
Amen AIG 🙏
The heavens declare his glory period 🙏🔥💯🙏
Y'all should contact some of these families and do what you're pointing out that others haven't done, record them, and them provide it to us. - if resources permit of course.
Negative words have effects on the mental state but do they effect the physical.
6:35 Sounds more like desperate attempt to make money via a controversial scientific theory,maybe we need to pray for that guy’s financial situation that he would find God though His miraculous provisions 🤔👍
What are stars got to do with evolution? Why are they "evolutionists" when referring to stars?! This is so silly.
It describes the difference between a process by which natural laws can produce stars and the idea that all stars were made supernaturally on day 4 of creation. It’s not really related to evolution it the Darwin sense.
@@justinpeterburford I see. However, it seems the hosts were implying that if people believe stars formed naturally, then they are neo-Darwinists. This is similar to the assertion that atheists must believe in the Big Bang simply because they are atheists, which isn't necessarily true. An atheist is someone who doesn't believe in God, and this disbelief isn't inherently linked to naturalism, although it often correlates.
@@spacesciencelab anyone that disagree with bible is an «evolutionist».
@luish1498 good old creationist strawman.
"If we call anyone who understands any field of science an evolutionist we can dismis them for having a weak argument"
@katamas832 so Christianity in the root meaning is a follower of Jeshua. I aggree there are many different groups in the umbrella of Christianity but the fundamental part of it is Jeshua came to earth to try to teach the humans to turn away from sin.they inevitably did not. The jews thought the Messiah was coming to literally free them from roman occupation. That was not the case. Jeshua taught that to be free from sin is the freedom that they were after. Then thus after the sin was gone they could be with God again. They turned from him thus there needed to be a payment for the sins of the world. The only payment worthy enough would be a completely sinless being. So Jeshua being who he is freely gave his human body up as payment. Idk if you have read any of the bible. John 3 16 says for God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son. For so whoever believes in him ( jeshua) will have everlasting life. That is the Christianity truth i speak of.
Why did you reply here instead of the comment thread?
@@katamas832 😞 me and technology don't get along sometimes.
@@ooelectronoo Got you, I was a bit confused. Happens, don't worry.
Well, that does sound pretty good in the way that you described it. If that's all, I might be willing to be a Christian knowing that Christianity is true. But what bugs me is, this isn't all of it, is it? I think what sin is, what the consequence of sin is, and whether or not a human could ever hope to help to not sin, and whether or not that is even their fault, is sort of left out. From my understanding, sin is disobeying the rules set by God, with the punishment being eternal existance in torment for even any one sin, with the rules being set up so that even some natural, biological reactions from a person is considered a sin, and most people don't even know something is a sin before they commit it. To me, it seems like we are set up for failure and are blamed for it, and expected to accept that. It doesn't sit well with me.
Nothing would stop me from acknowledging the existance of God and Jesus if Christianity were true, but to be a Christian, I would have some reserves.
@@katamas832can we get out of TH-cam comments and talk about this I really like talking with people about why they don't like, follow or even believe in God. It helps me understand them more.
@katamas832 I would really like to continue this conversation but would like to tak it off TH-cam comments. We Don't have to call one another, emailing would work fine. If not we can stay on here.
So if I understand it correctly is that you have a hard time with the fact that we are all sinners and fall short of the glory of God. Who do you base your morality off. Is it your own scale or society. Or is there an ultimate authority which states what is right and wrong. If it is your self or society that it's based upon than you have no moral authority saying Adolf Hitlyer was wrong. Or Mao or staling or any dictator who has killed his on people. The only way for a objective morality to be is for objective moral being to be. That being cannot be confined by this world. Because than it would be merely subjective again. Every human sins not because they are bad people, it is because we are human and we were given free will. Thus with our meeger 3# brain we are easily confused by the devil. Now it you follow God and have a shield given by the holy spirit you can defend against the devil.
So I read your comment more. So what part of everyone sins and falls short of God's glory is troubling to you.it is true that you are not held to the transgressions of your father but you are for your own. God wants us to live in peace. No fighting, love one man or woman, marriage is between a man and woman. And be fruitful and multiply. Don't listen to what the devil wants you to do.
As a muslim i like love watching your show muslims are also creationist ...in the quran King Soloman/we call him a prophet of God.God gave him the understanding the language of animals ..there is a beautiful passage on him on his way to sheba with his army ..and a female amt warns the other ants to get into their holes for fear of the army trampling them to death..and Soloman smiled ..also had language of birds ...the Hoepoo that was under his subjugation saw flew to the people of Sheba pagans who had a queen (sheba )and was on her way with her army to see Soloman with gifts so they would not war them .soloman also had jinn (creation before humans created from smokeless fire )family of satan,..they still all around us my take on Aliens is that its Jinn fooling the evolutionists to think they come fom somewhere out there when they have always been here ..they also have free will just like us..they can live for thousands of years .also have famalies and also different religions just like up ..my point about Jinn is some of them also worked for Soloman (peace and blessings be on him)they built his palaces ...Christians and muslims are brothers ....made in the image of God dont mean to muslims that we look like God ..we see it as how God saw fit how to make us ...Satan was very highbup with God because he believed in God so whenever God created something he invited Satan to dwell in thecrealm of the angels ..and all God day to a new creation is "Be"and it is ..when God created Adam Satan was predent ..when god said to the angels bow down tobmy new creation they all did except Satan ...the first show of arrogance..Angels have no sex and have no free will
.so there is no such thing as fallen angels ..the fallen angel in Christianity was Satan ..he refused to bow down to Adam ..said to God you made him fom mus and yoi made me from fire ..i am better than him ..Jinn can also shift shape ..into snakes humans and dogs some of them can fly just like ...proper name( Ifrit )...who woeked for Prophet Soloman..he brought Shebas throne to him in a blink of and eye before she even arrived there ...i can go on and on ..but after 1am here need some sleep ...for those who are intersted read the storiesxof the propheys of old ..the truth about their lives isxall in the Quran..keep and open mind ..i come from a catholic tradition ..but found all the questions i asked my Priest about things in the bible that i use to query (all i was told is to have faith )....coulnt live on blind faith ...from a very early age ...things that did not make logical sense to me ..got all my answers when i finally and reluctantly when i read the english translation of the Quran!..even the story of Mother Mary and the virgin birth ...a whole chapter dedicated to her called surah (chapter)Maryam...Mary..most beatiful story to read ..gives you the genealogy and about everyday life of people of those days ..
.....
I love God. But I also do like a good room temp challenge completed 😂😂
So if plants are conscious does that mean they will stop everyone from eating veg also. Veg have rights also. A lot of adverts on TV now seem to be replacing talking animals with talking veg. What will we eat then probably something reminiscent to the slop they ate on The Matrix and/or maybe flavoured pills.
For Pete's sake, Genesis says KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL came from a PLANT. Jonah was devastated when his plant died. I had a grapefruit plant I really liked. Jesus said, I AM THE VINE. He was the Root of Jesse. The prophets frequently anthropomorphize plants. If the rocks will cry out, how much more plants?
Nah, I think you are wrong. Plants often cover a more profound meaning in the scripture. For instance, the fig tree is a symbolism of Israel. Jesus cursed a the fig tree for he found no fruit on it. Also, God cursed Jonah’s tree to teach him a lesson about love and care. The bush is a representation of accusation. The burning bush is under judgement and yet it is not condemned because the fire does not consume it. I think the scripture is far more interesting and deeper than mere anthropomorphism
@@alexanderseton Wrong about what? I agree that the fig tree is symbolic. That doesn't preclude the tree being, at some level (its own level, not ours), sentient.
@@medicalmisinformationPlants do not have a soul and they definitely don't have any hemoglobin, so there's that.
@@Alec_Cox People don't "have" souls. You ARE a soul.
God bless
Los cielos declaran la gloria de Dios, y las estrellas revelan las obras de sus manos.
Stars are God's creation.
There is not such thing as "space" in the first place, so that´s all you need to know. Earth is not globe, there was not Big Bang, not evolution, there are not "aliens" (only demons / shape-shifters who pretending to be ones), etc. You´re welcome, thank me later. Check my playlists.
What created God?
@@toni4729 if God were created, He wouldn't be God.
@@TJforChrist If he wasn't he's strictly your imagination. Nothing comes from nothing.
@@toni4729but you believe the universe came from nothing 😂😂😂
I believe got made the stars on Day One, and on Day Four God "placed' the stars the moo and the sun.
If you want to see why I believe that, search for Pastor Allen Nolan Genesis series part 6 of the series.
He's going to the original source, and using scripture to reinforce his case
"Plants aren't really alive in that sense"... 🤔 have you ever grown anything? Air circulation is an incredibly important factor, without proper circulation, plants welt and die.
Only 2 choices. .The ALMIGHTY made the Earth & Universe & all life. .Or Buildings++ made themselves somehow!!
2 choices
1. magic man did it
2. We do not know exactly how things came into being and claiming you do requires proof.
@@wingednut2283 who says there is no proof?
@@zerosteel0123 the majority of the world says your religion does not have enough proof because if you did then why are there less believers every year
@@wingednut2283 the majority of the world doesn't know more than our Almighty God.
@@IAMhassentyou prove he exists before making a claim he knows everything
More motorcyclists wearing helmets go to the hospital after a crash. Therefore, the helmets are dangerous to the cyclist.
In the Beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth.
3:03 to 3:51
Assuming gas clouds collapse into stars? No, we don't assume gas clouds collapse into stars, we know they collapse into stars based on how gravity works and we can calculate it and saying that they can't collapse in to stars because "gas want's to expand" is just not true. If giant gas clouds with the mass 333,000+ Earths can't collapse into stars because the pressure would over power gravity then Earth couldn't even hope to have enough mass to hold on to it's atmosphere.
“Evolutionists” don’t have an opinion on star formation. That would be astronomers.
So, someone who won’t even read the paper and someone else who is also not an astronomer are telling us that the evolutionists are wrong about astronomy.
Yeah, right.
Make that make sense.
People are so stupid they no longer know how to find nourishment and food, that plant knows how to find it which means it is smarter than people. It's a matter of perspective like you were talking earlier
Did she think twice before sitting on that real leather chair tho? Lol
Genesis Day 4.."OH,by the way, God created the stars also". After the Sun and Moon of course.. 😉
The plant lover must be into pantheism.
Plants can die so we need to know they are just as alive as we are.
Oh, my computer died last night too. I suppose we should have a funeral and mourn. Oh wait...it's a METAPHOR. Plug it back in!
Did you think that humanity was the only chosen species in all of the 4.5 billion year day 7 of creation? Humanist religions are not in communion with God, but are falling victim to the adversary's divisive psyops
*_Joh 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life:_* *_no man cometh unto the Father, but by me._* *_KJB_*
What if the defect comes from the medical practices like vaccines and other current procedures???
Like what? What kind of defects as the result of what kind of process?
What if the defect comes from the normal practices like cell phones and other current procedures??
🌵"Plants ☘️...Having...Conversations ??? 😶....Soooo... what's next ??? Does this mean that (🥩 Kitchen Poultry 🍳🍗) will start having private meetings to form a (Union) ??? 😶
How did the stars become?
Read the Bible it’s in the first book Genesis 😉
dont read the bible. read science books
The Bible is the best source
@zerosteel0123 the bible is the best source of reminding us why we should read a science book, or an ethics book, a history book, a book on logic and reason, a book on astronomy or cosmology, definitely some books on biology and chemistry, some physics, human physiology is a good one, engineering basics are great. Even some boating.....minimal knowledge of boating will very quickly destroy Noah's ark for you once you realize that within minutes without proper steering it would turn broadside and capsize in the waves....
The bible is a fantastic example of why you should actually go and learn things in the real world.
They say the Universe began with a big bang
Yet no one can say why it began
They search for the cause that started all things
Not willing to accept the Person of God
Who structured the laws that govern all things
They continue in vain to search for a cause
I look at the Heavens and the Order there in
The Wonder and Beauty Displayed
God’s Knowledge and Wisdom cannot be measured
He who dwells in the Eternal Now
The Great “I AM”
Why did God Create the Universe and all there IN?
That His Glory may be Revealed and His Love Within
"They say the Universe began with a big bang" As your fable began incorrectly, so did you here. Georges Lemaître a Catholic priest proposed the idea. Basically you are upside down on this whole thing.
"His Glory may be Revealed and His Love Within" We know (because it has been measured) that the VAST majority of the universe as a whole is INSTANTLY deadly to all forms of life. Is that love in your book? LOL
@@frosted1030 We know (because it has been measured ) What is the essence of energy? Energy is the means by which the Law takes effect. Any time the law acts energy is manifested. Law and Energy are both created by a Sovereign God, who out of His Love has placed us in this vast Universe where we can survive and witness His LOVE and GLORY. Yet we want to destroy it.
@@allanpeter3125 "What is the essence of energy?" Which type of energy would you like to discuss? Kinetic, potential, chemical, thermal, electrical, electrochemical, electromagnetic, sonic, or nuclear? Don't think you prepared with this argument from ignorance fallacy.
" Any time the law acts energy is manifested." That is not the way we define physical laws. A law states how something behaves under specific conditions. This is not something magical, arbitrary, or unmeasured.
" Law and Energy are both created by a Sovereign God" That's a wild claim, you need some sort of very strong support now. Let's start by specifically defining your imaginary friend and forming a predictive model. If you run away now, use vague terms, or have no idea what we are discussing, your assertion fails.
"who out of His Love has placed us in this vast Universe" No, that was your mother.
"Yet we want to destroy it." If it can be destroyed by the truth, it should be.
@@frosted1030 The classical definition of energy:" Energy is that which when possessed by a body gives it the capacity to do work or changes the state of the body". Note, (Is that which) No one knows what is the Nature/Substance of Energy. All what you have mentioned is the manifestation of energy in different forms.
@@allanpeter3125 " The classical definition of energy:" Energy is that which when possessed by a body gives it the capacity to do work or changes the state of the body" Again, specifically what type of energy are we discussing? Or is vagary in order to distract your tactic here?
"All what you have mentioned is the manifestation of energy in different forms." We have specific definitions and they are all measured, and understood. It's like you really want to make broad generalizations about topics with no clue, and quickly move on. Specify the type of energy, if you can.
Evolution has nothing to do with star formation .
31 And behold, the glory of the Lord was upon Moses, so that Moses stood in the presence of God, and talked with him face to face. And the Lord God said unto Moses: For mine own purpose have I made these things. Here is wisdom and it remaineth in me.
32 And by the word of my power, have I created them, which is mine Only Begotten Son, who is full of grace and truth.
33 And worlds without number have I created; and I also created them for mine own purpose; and by the Son I created them, which is mine Only Begotten.
34 And the first man of all men have I called Adam, which is many.
35 But only an account of this earth, and the inhabitants thereof, give I unto you. For behold, there are many worlds that have passed away by the word of my power. And there are many that now stand, and innumerable are they unto man; but all things are numbered unto me, for they are mine and I know them.
36 And it came to pass that Moses spake unto the Lord, saying: Be merciful unto thy servant, O God, and tell me concerning this earth, and the inhabitants thereof, and also the heavens, and then thy servant will be content.
37 And the Lord God spake unto Moses, saying: The heavens, they are many, and they cannot be numbered unto man; but they are numbered unto me, for they are mine.
38 And as one earth shall pass away, and the heavens thereof even so shall another come; and there is no end to my works, neither to my words.
39 For behold, this is my work and my glory-to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.
40 And now, Moses, my son, I will speak unto thee concerning this earth upon which thou standest; and thou shalt write the things which I shall speak.
41 And in a day when the children of men shall esteem my words as naught and take many of them from the book which thou shalt write, behold, I will raise up another like unto thee; and they shall be had again among the children of men-among as many as shall believe. Moses 1
Genesis 9:4, Plants do not have blood
Why would an "evolutionist" be concerned with cosmology and the physics of star formation? AiG is, as usual, flailing around attacking any science any way it can and then claiming this somehow invalidates evolutionary theory.
Dreaming . unreal dreamers in an unreal dream
The only way to get them back is to defeat Hamas .
29:47
Arguing in the alternative, a lawyer's tactic, let's say these stars are being formed in the manner they think. So what? Adam and Eve were specific creations and the rest of us are the result of natural processes God created; if stars ARE being formed by natural processes, that would also be by natural processes established by He who created scientific laws.
I always thought it wouldn't be against His nature to make stars repopulate themselves, like He did with living things. However, in recorded history, the difference is that He specifically said for living things to reproduce themselves. He did not say that for stars. Not to mention, given the age of the universe, we wouldn't even be able to see stars form if He did design them to do so. And that in itself would be in His nature, to let us witness something spectacular like that if He did choose to design stars to do that.
@@TheartofThorns I agree. I do not think we could handle knowing everything He knows so its possible He did set a process in motion for star death and star birth; however, our existence is so short, we could not possibly, reasonably see enough of it on this side of eternity to be certain of what is going on.
Evolution has nothing to do with star formation 😂😂😂 Deceitful little liars here
30:36, really, the mothers are not required to carry their child to term. It's easy to drive to another state to kill your child 😢
Stars are lights in the firmament that will fall to earth in the end time. It would be awesome if Answers in Genesis would actually get some answers from Genesis. Genesis 1 is literal history.
I would except aborting if you had to go to prizon for 5-10 for if you request a second one within 25 years 😂😂
“Evolutionists” don’t say anything about stars etc.
can you people ever have an honest discussion?
We could ask the same about evolutionists...but they never actually do, do they?....they just blatantly ignore all the huge problems with the faulty theory.... I can show you a great resource if you want... A video where Dr. James tour talks about some massive issues with evolution.
@@janickgonzalez8900 there are no issues with evolution Janick, it’s a fully resolved scientific theory which has been tested and shown to be correct consistently over and over.
The only people who find issues with it are people who go into it with preconceived ideas and use spurious arguments.
Proves nothing
Evolutionists??? Lol no such thing.
Nobody believes in evolution as defined by the claims phylogenetic tree of life? Interesting hypothesis..
108 views but 122 likes?
The same thing happens on other TH-cam posts. People watch but don't click 👍. I do it myself.
@karenblohm3279 Yeah but in this case it appears to be the other way around.
Your first mistake is assuming TH-cam is reliable .
Aerospace Engineer =/= Astrophysicist
He is an engineer of flight mechanics... I would like to hear his credentials on Astrophysics.
Argumentum ad verecundiam is not an argument. Anybody with his background can understand the claim of astrophysicists regarding these phenomena. Empirical evidence would be nice, but we don't have that. Which astrophysicists would you believe? They don't all agree about much of anything in cosomogony.
@@sliglusamelius8578yet he doesn’t think clouds of gas can form into stars 🤦🏻♂️
I’m 100% Christian. I disagree with your premises on plants based on scripture. There are so many indications of plants having consciousness. Of course it’s not the same level of humans. But several people testify after death encounters with Heaven speak about plants having awareness and worship God.
ahahah evilutionists are wrong twice a day ....everyday
too bad stats are just lights in the firmament.
There is a lot of ignorance on this channel
Yes, from atheists
Like what give a an example
Children are not mutilated@@Amandy217
@@klouis1886hahahahahaha WHAT?!?!?!?! what are you talking about?
And it's from athiests.... I'd be happy to refer a video of Dr. James tour if you'd open your mind to it?
Bible got creation order wrong. The earth was not created before the stars."Genesis's creation narrative is divided into seven days, with God creating light on the first day, the sky on the second, the earth, seas, and vegetation on the third, the sun and moon on the fourth, "
I think you can make an argument that when it says "God created the Heavens and the Earth," this included making the universe, stars, solar system, etc. prior to actual "day 1" of creation, when the earth was just a void like the other planets we observe.
@contra-mundum-94-bc3pu why the specificity of 7 days with specific things on each day? Deliberately confusing with multiple interpretations making it factually worthless?
@@richardkatz8713 I think to say that because something has multiple interpretations that makes it "factually worthless" is a stretch. There are plenty of historical documents that have various interpretations by scholars that still give insight into historical views about x,y, or z. Making it a zero sum game is rather simplistic.
Second, the specifics of 7 days is in relation to God's activity AFTER the earth was formed. This to me is rather obvious since the text says " God made the heavens and the earth, and the earth...." Notice that the heavens and Earth are made, then the text turns to the earth.
Stars be formed along with "the heavens" at the beginning make sense if we consider the question of how there was light before there was the sun (see Day 4). I've never heard great answers from those who insist the sun was made on day 4, instead of appeared on day 4. There's whole articles about that.
@contra-mundum-94-bc3pu so if you can interpret something multiple, contrary ways, it's accurate? Really?
@@richardkatz8713 Are you trying to suggest that nothing that gives information needs to be interpreted? Really? So what about the photos from James Webb? There's no possible way that scientists might interpret the information from those photos differently? If anything requires interpretation then it's worthless? Yes, that's a ridiculous standard.
Slow down rocket man. You missed the target and did not make a point.
Yes he did. You just don't like the point.
Pure nonsense
he's an aerospace engineer, not a cosmologist or astrophysicist.
Argumentum ad verecundiam is not an argument. Not all astrophysicists agree about cosmogony, are you going to tell us which ones we can believe?
AIG has them, as well. Just because he answered the question doesn't mean there were people in the background working on it that aren't scientists.
I have looked into the echo chamber and i am not happy with what i have seen. Charles bless anyone that reads this and may your genetic material be passed on through evolution.
All science is science fiction
are cell phones fiction?
The computer you are using and the interfaces with the computer that you communicate through with it are a product of science
Not a single creationist understands Evolution.
Not a single creationist on this channel really pays attention to what you say.
@@zerosteel011 You literally just paid attention to what I have said and replied accordingly
@@katamas832 well let's put it another way. We really don't care about your opinion of us. Or what we believe. We believe in Jesus. We believe God's word is true and your opinion of it is meaningless. That better?
@@zerosteel011 It's not an opinion though, it's a fact. The fact that none of you understand Evolution does not contradict The Bible, God and Jesus.
Get a room you 2
this content has to be up there for THE most intellectually dishonest propaganda ive seen.
it disgraceful, really
Lol that's funny
You're trying too hard
@@inthelightofhisglory9614 not as funny as liking your own comments
@@haydenwalton2766 that's ok. I'll like them too 😉🙏✝️
@@newcreationinchrist1423 haha that's funny. I didn't even like my own comments
Evolution is not about star formation.
Pretty sure they never said that. It is about naturalism and the atheistic worldview though.
It has nothing to do with naturalism or atheism either.
@@i7Qp4rQ that's right. I think it's called cosmic evolution or something along those lines.
@@i7Qp4rQ They may both use the word "Evolution" = but that doesn't make them the same thing at all.
@@SK-bw2cvexactly! It gives evolutionists a timeline for everything else they believe. 🙏🙏🙏
No outerspace. Genesis explains Flat Earth!!!!!!!!
Dude, what are you talking about? It only does if you take it at face value....is it wise to take EVERYTHING in the Bible at face value? Absolutely not....go check out Dr. Hugh Ross.
I’m curious… are any Christian YEC bothered by the dishonesty Answers in Genesis employs by referring to everybody they disagree with on any scientific subject as “evolutionists”?
Anyone who believes in Evolution as their foundation of life and truth, is an Evolutionist. I guess the term evolutionist is used somewhat loosely; it used to refer to someone who either studied/studies or teaches evolution. Most people who believe in evolution aren’t actual scientists but rather have a belief in evolutionism, which is just another form of man-made religion; a religion void of spiritualism but purely based on naturalism and humanism.
They tend to say naturalist meaning they believe everything emerged through natural means. The terms secularist, naturalist, Darwinist, and evolutionist are used interchangeably by religious and non-religious people to usually refer to people who support the government, public education, and public university view or narrative.
Not at all. It's the just a way to differentiate between scientists who believe creation and scientists who believe evolution. Why would that bother me?
@@litigioussociety4249 good explanation
You’re triggered that they call people who believe in evolution “evolutionists”. Cry us a river mate
Sorry,reality exists in the human mind and nowhere else.there no outer space
"Rocket Rob", has no clue biology is not cosmology, probably why NASA said go work somewhere else yo
You mean NASA that can't fly space shuttles safely? The organization that makes politically biased decisions?
I mean just because he is mainly a rocket scientist, it doesn't mean that he can't know biology. He doesn't need to have a PhD in Biology.
@@JCAbhishek Those who study cosmology and those who study biology are different people.
@@captivedesk3168 People can study multiple subjects not just one. There is nothing stopping a cosmologist from learning biology and there is nothing stopping a biologist from learning cosmology. One doesn't have to have a PhD in Biology to talk about biology and one doesn't have to have a PhD in Cosmology to talk about Cosmology.
@@JCAbhishek you dont understand, Rocket Rob said evolutionists...big bang, biologists do not study the big bang, cosmologists do not study evolution.
The study of the universe is cosmology not biology.
Always good to know what the anti-science crowd thinks.
They all have PHDs in Science. What do you have?
Sure, as if that is the reason you're here. More like, you know that you will answer to the real God, and you won't be getting a second chance on your imaginary wheel of creation - sounds like a game show.
@@teslasnek Any time I hear a creationist has a PhD it is either at some sham Creationist college, OR the work they did in their research has NOTHING to do with creationism. With that said, credentials don't make you a scientist. Having a respect for evidence does.
You know popular science that you absorb through osmosis. The narratives in science change all the time, that's how science works. So what you think is true today might be proved wrong tomorrow..
if Albert Einstein believed the bible, why did he think the Universe was 13.8 billion years old. Before Albert, everyone assumed that the Universe was 16 billion years old. hopefully, this makes sense did everyone just go with his famous math problem and go nuts with it?
_if Albert Einstein believed the bible_
He didn;t. He explicitly said he didn;t. He actually called the bible a collection of childish myths.
@@richardgregory3684 Albert Einstein was a Catholic am i wong
@@johngallo1988 Yes you are wrong. His parents were Jewish (though non-believers), he attended a Catholic _school_ and was briefly religious, but abandoned religion by the age of 12.
@@richardgregory3684 thank you but was he a Catholic I mean if I am wrong then great
@@richardgregory3684 thank you that makes more sense
Okay, here's the thing that got me confused over the past month of research. Creationists do not dispute the "size" of the universe, only the age of the universe. But there are two big problems with that. If indeed the edge is at least 13 billion light years away, then for the light to have gotten to us at the moment of Creation would have required a Godly intervention and extraordinary, almost incalculable increase in the speed of light. But for us to calculate the speed of light accurately now, would have required it to slow down. If in fact the light "slowed down" then we would when we looked at the nighttime sky now, see huge patches of sky with no stars in them at all, because the "present day" light would have not reached us yet.
Why don't you take a trip to some creationist websites? There's plenty of them. AIG has articles on it. I don't understand why people ask questions like this on their YT channel but never explore their website.
@@inthelightofhisglory9614 I have spent the last 40 days doing research, "including" AiG and CRI. I have read and lsiened to the "official" explanation of the creation of the universe, and am perfectly willing to entertain the notion that creation only took 6 days. That is not the issue. The issue is coming up with a plausible "explanation" for all the processes taking only 4-6 thousand years.
@@kennethswenson6214 creationists have many different possible scenarios they are exploring. Try Jason Lisle as well. He has some videos on it.
Check out the "Starlight in Time" book by Russell Humphrey PhD. He studied gravity here on earth and offer up a theory based on the empirical science found.
@@cnex101 LOL, it's laughable nonsense that attempts to bend the evidence to fit with a ridiculous story about a magical cosmic wizard written by iron age desert tribesmen
Lol what a joke this show is. Like actually... hi I'm dr so and so, I didn't even read this cause it doesn't agree with the Bible. What kinda Dr are you? My guess your not a dr and you actually attended some kinda church based colleges with no accredited programs but ok your a dr who doesn't read if it's not a Bible. And agree with guy above, more likes then views😂
Your comment would be worthwhile, if you addressed any of the evidence for the things you felt they didn't read, or that shows their doctorates are invalid.
@@litigioussociety4249or if he could show he is a doctor himself. Wouldn't make much sense to be criticizing someone for not being a doctor if you're not a doctor. Lol
Or, being a doctor is not necessary to have common sense or have critical thinking, especially with the failure that is most if not all schooling in America and other countries.
Can a man become a woman?
@@zerosteel011 You don't need to have a doctorate to criticize someone on a subject; I've heard people with PhDs say incredibly stupid things. There's also people who are a doctor in a different subject, and takr advantage of people assuming they're a doctor in the topic being discussed; for example, several media people thought Jill Biden was a medical doctor a few years ago, because she kept calling herself Dr. Jill Biden when discussing Covid.