Black Swan Beyond The Horizon
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ต.ค. 2024
- A documentary on the observations made in 2020 by Dr John D. in his search for truth and understanding, of the world we live in.
By far the best observational proof ever, that we are not living on a curved ball.
A collaboration of Dr John D and ChrisUK brings you this documentary.
Enjoy, feel free to copy share.
No money has or will be made by us on this video.
Its is made for nonprofit educational purposes, No commercial use.
The makers of this video will not make a copyright strike against anyone.
Dr John D raw observation footage available on the links below.
Black swan 1. • Video 1 - Black Swan, ...
Black swan 2. • Video 2 - Black Swan, ...
Dr John D. TH-cam channel, full of groundbreaking observations and analysis.
www.youtube.co...
All music from Wondershare Filmora 11/12 library.
Dr John D's observation height = 3.5 feet/2 feet; Distance to globe horizon = 2.3 miles/1.7 miles; Closest turbine (#1) = 8.4 miles; Furthest turbine (#6) = 11.2 miles. This observation by Dr. John D. simply destroys the phony globe. The horizon is far behind the furthest turbine at 11. 2 miles (as proven by the boat that is higher perspectively). The refraction argument is utter rubbish as that would require the huge bulge to somehow escape being wrapped around the curvature as well but instead selectively disappears 6+ miles in front of the first platform and then relocates many miles beyond 11.2 miles all without affecting the turbines in between and without any substantial distortion or disruption of the perspective view. In other words, other than wishful thinking in baseless unrealistic fantasies and hijacking the term refraction, there is no counter-argument here - this ends the globe to any rational objective thinking person. The earth is flat! I also love how you show how much each turbine should be hidden behind the supposed globe at an increasing height and the fact that magnification is real and may explain exactly why the sun sets the way it does (I didn't notice that before). This documentary is awesome! A big thanks to both you and Dr John D!
Great points, Ben!
Imagine what you'd see at a 30 inch camera height and your target only stood 14 to 16 feet at 11.22 miles? By the globe standards you would see nothing but yet there it is in many of my videos of cutters rock.
The Crystal river power plant is my focus and I've been digging through all of my videos to gather up a bunch of footage so eventually I can put together a video showing it's not beyond any curvature. Once things slow down for me I'm hoping I can put it together in a fairly short video. Hopefully lol
@@KryptonitePhysics I probably have a hundred trolls banned with 10 sock puppet accounts each making a 1,000+. They're a bunch of lying scum that will hijack the comments if you don't get control over it. I do allow some to keep it interesting and honest but they aren't allowed to spam the comments. They cry censorship but if they can get TH-cam to stop banning my comments on almost all channels, then I will allow all of theirs.
@@tumenibits569 "the world is a tilted, 1666kmph spinning, comet like flying in 4 directions sky pear planet with erveoyne all 360 degrees around the outside of it".
No, Too many Sh*ts. Not tilted, not spinning, not pear shaped, not having everoyne all 360 degrees around the outside of it, all sideways and upside down to each other 😂 and I think you know that, Sh*ts. 😂
@@tumenibits569 Lol. 100 comments with no content to debunk or rebate anything, I read them all then delete, if you have no content on channel, or in comment you get blocked.
If the horizon is "too far away" (which it isn't) that just means the globe is a larger globe. If the earth was flat, you would not see a sharp horizon, ever. It would always be hidden by haze.
This video, just like all other flat earth videos ever, just proves that the earth is a globe.
Your grasping at straws, how can 6 turbines and a ship, all at different distance and height rise up in a line of prospective on a globe?
They can't.
@@KryptonitePhysics You are changing the topic, because you know I'm correct. But I'll prove you wrong again.
The line is in fact not straight, it curves slightly, which you can see if you put a ruler on it. Just as expected on a globe. It's not 100% clear, but that's because those windmills are not in a perfectly straight line with equal distances.
But do you know where you can find that? Lake Pontchartrain, where the power lines do exactly that, and create a completely obvious curve.
The furthest base rises above the nearest from front to back, should not happen from 2 to 3 foot above the water.
@@KryptonitePhysics "The furthest base rises above the nearest from front to back,"
Huh? What do you mean? It doesn't rise anything at all.
"should not happen from 2 to 3 foot above the water."
You have to be more specific and use clearer language, not just say things like "it" (which it) and "rises" (what do you mean, nothing is rising anywhere) and "should not happen" (why not)?
This is now just vague handwaving. You are basically just saying "Oh, that can't happen" but no explanation of what is happening and why it can't happen.
@@RegebroRepairs Humm
In the images, nearest base of turbine is below, furthest and the ship.
How on God's flat earth are there only 1.4K views after a month? I realize it's been mirrored, but I'm still sadly shocked. This video is 100 times better than the latest from the controlled opposition that gets praised as the best out there. Oh well.
I am shadow banned, this gets out via mirroring, and it is, its already in several languages.
@@KryptonitePhysics Gotcha. Thanks for the reply. Amazing presentation!
@@livemusic Have a look at this channel th-cam.com/video/JplYi49RR3Q/w-d-xo.html
@@RegebroRepairs Yet you have so much time on your hands you keep coming here are you feeling ok?
@@RegebroRepairs No problem off you go back to fairyland.
Where is compensation for refraction?
Refraction is the magnification of the observed objects, add any refractions you like the same at each object, still will not line up all 7 objects up in a prospective line above the horizon, and reflect in the sea.
1. All different distance.
2. All different levels.
3. Atmospheric layers the same height at each object.
4. If not same level, how do you get different uniform layers and distance for each object.
5. If different at middle object, they would not line up.
@@KryptonitePhysics Refraction also displaces observed position. The bowfisher who aims at where he sees the fish misses. You can also use a magnifying glass to rotate an object by refraction.
Hold a book 12 inches in front of your eyes. The spine is all you can see of the book.
Place a four inch diameter magnifying glass between your eyes and the book. Sure, the spine is magnified, but look what happens as you slide the magnifying glass vertically, changing how light from the book is bent by refraction off the center of the magnifying glass.
With the center of the magnifying glass below the spine of the book, the book appears to tilt and you can see a little of the top cover which was hidden by the spine without refraction. Slide the magnifying glass up, so the center of the glass is above the book and you start to see the lower cover rotate into view.
Refraction will let you see around the corner of the spine. It's kind of fun, too. As you slide the glass vertically, leaving it square on to your vision, the book appears to tilt up and down.
Interestingly, the view the bowfisher has of the fish includes parts of the fish that would be hidden without the refraction caused by differing optical densities because he's looking at the fish from a different angle.
In your video of the wind turbines, look at the supporting structure of the platform. See how those braces near the water are warped? Do you think they appear bent like that without refraction?
@@johnnyragadoo2414Lol, water and air, take 7 points at different distance all at different levels, turbine's,boat, show how that applies to all 7 rising above the horizon in perfect line with eachother, in prospective.
You can get away with your nonsense with one object, not 7, or the hole field of turbines bases being visible, every single one, and a ship 20.8miles away,
Fish in water won't do it,
@@KryptonitePhysics Refraction will affect everything you see - but how about this. Is your observation repeatable? Does it change during the course of the day? (Spoilers: no, these observations are not consistent, and yes, they do change during the course of a day.)
You are called Kryptonite Physics, but your understanding of physics seems to be very low level...
This is clear, concise, and absolutely disproves the globe-model of Earth. Fantastic work! I hope people will see this, share it, try to understand it, really think about, and then open their minds to a new worldview.
That because Earth is global
What would you say is the reason for the misrepresentation of earth as a globe? Who gains by this?
Heliosorcery the spell to steal human consciousness
Fantastic, very well put, simple's
Can you explain why Polaris sinks 1° every 69 miles, even though on a flat earth we would expect otherwise? If you do the math, it should sink at a nonlinear and asymptotic rate, so on flat earth Polaris should never dip below the horizon.
Also in the same vein, why is there a south celestial pole? I hope I can get a response
A good idea when you want to comment against something is to actually go and look at the evidence against you. If Polaris was close, would it drop due to prospective.
The honest answer is yes.
Go and look at the evidence for the South pole.
What evidence do you have for observing the turbines bases and ship all at different levels and distances, rising above the observer position. With the horizon in the distance. In a perfect line of prospective.
And reflecting in the sea at the same time?
@@KryptonitePhysics There are plenty of photos of wind farms, many done by flat earthers, where we not only see the bottom of more distant turbines hidden by the horizon, but sometime right up to the nacelle and even with only the top blade visible above the water. We should not see this on a flat earth.
Yes, this video does show turbines that should be hidden by the horizon but you also presented evidence of towering (looming that stretches objects higher) of the ships superstructure which is commonly seen when refraction conditions are extreme. This usually happens on calm, windless days because the water cools the layer of air right above the water. That layer of cooler air bends light down which makes distant objects appear higher (looming). I would be willing to bet if this video was made on a day with wind that the bottom of the distant turbines would be hidden by the horizon.
As for evidence of the South Pole. In the northern hemisphere the summer sun rises in the NE, swings south at noon then heads back north to set in the NW. At night the sun continues on a path below the northern horizon to return to the east. When I was in the southern hemisphere I saw a summer sun that rose in the SE, swung north at noon then headed back south to set in the SW. At night the sun travelled below the southern horizon to return to the east. This observed sun path is completely opposite of the sun path observed in the northern hemisphere.
If the earth was flat then I should have seen a sun path that is around the North Pole from all locations on earth. I did not see this. What I saw can only be explained by the globe.
the further away the object is, the more the atmosphere has an effect on the object! also the perspective.
We want you to explain the evidence on the this video, don't get away from the topic
@@pikaking But neither perspective, not the atmosphere, has that kind of effect.
Fantastic! What a blessing to have such a presentation to share with those still stuck on a globe. Thank you!
Are you claiming you can leave the earth?
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Inscrito 735 🌎🤺
May are ask: in a world with planes flying people anywhere they want to go… why are there no pictures of the rim of earth?
You can not fly anyplace you like, look into the Antarctic treaty , flight confined to 60/70 degrees latitude south.
As for rim?? Posable ice wall. you can see photos of an ice wall, or high altitude ice.
This vido provides no doubt we are not on the ball they tell us we are on. start from that point.
@@KryptonitePhysics
You can fly all the way westwards/eastwards at the level of say Japan or Turkey, can’t you?
@@ilkyway5854 You are asking very basic questions,
Go and look at the FE model.
Its not a disk in space with an edge.
North is in the middle.
South all around the outside. I have an FE playlist take a look at that.
@@KryptonitePhysics Two questions: why is your evidence more sound than what we learn at school? And why are they teaching it wrong at school. Where is the Money?
@@ilkyway5854 Go look, or dont, the only way you will find out, is to look or yourself.
At School you were shown no evidence, just you live on a globe. look at the ball.
Funny thing is every globe that is manufactured has a sticker on the bottom.
Not for educational purposes.
Amazing production and concept Chris. Only those who don't want to see will deny the evidence that we live on a stationary flat Earth!
Agreed, Eddie!
But you cannot explain seasons (that makes sense) Northern and southern star rotations, Time zones, in fact anything that explains nature
@@stevealdridge9720 If you look there are explanations for your questions, all of them.
@@KryptonitePhysics None that actually work in reality though
@@KryptonitePhysics There are NO explanations for time zones, BECAUSE the time lines run from north to south in a straight line. Show me a light source that can project light to half a disc in straight lines
Are you allow posting links ?
Try , YT blocks them sometimes.
This is a great example of refraction, on the turbines and especially the oil tanker. But you seem to have spent the whole video trying not to say the word. Refraction is 'not a thing' when you want to use the turbines as a globe debunk but it is 'a thing' when you want to explain why the Sun does not change in size during the day, as it would on a flat Earth. You can't have it both ways.
The distortion, compression, magnification are all refraction.
Due to the atmosphere.
Refraction is a general term, distortion of light.
Explain how 7 objects , different distance and level are observed above the horizon all in a prospective line, and reflect in the sea.
@@KryptonitePhysics You need to do this observation with the least amount of refraction before drawing a conclusion.
Google wind turbines, look for images,
how do you know how late it is ? how do you know the sun is setting in about 15 minutes ?
Check out the raw video footage links provided.
@@KryptonitePhysics how do you know that the sun is setting in the next 15 minutes? what is your source for the time of sunset ?
@@arri_luki8520 Lets say its a few min out.
What difference will this make to seeing 6 turbine basses in a prospective line and a ship at over 20 miles, all from 2ft above the water .all at different heights and distances.
Sun set, Date of observation, time shown on observation raw footage, weather and sun history.
@@KryptonitePhysics why do you use globe earth stuff to prove that flat earth is real ?
Time of sunset, Date, Time, Distances; thats all based on globe earth knowledge.
@@arri_luki8520 Hum, no, its based on observations over 100s of years, not reliant on a globe at all.
Your presuming it is. Its not.
you have no way on earth providing proof you are on a globe.
Spent 6 months when I first came across FE, looking into the globe model and FE.
Only thing it has is NASA images, moon landing footage. That's all dodgy as h%^l even the recent stuff.
At timestamp 4:35. The tide table. I am familiar with tide tables cos I fish tidal waters. Now, according to flat earthers, the sea is flat. Water is flat. Yet here we have a graph of water height v time. Each peak being 12 hours apart. The highest peaks coinciding with a new moon, when the moon is between us and the sun.
At timestamp 14:20. Thats not perspective. The towers are at a diagonal from the viewpoint. There is half a ship, no coast of france, and no Eifel tower. 😂😂
Timestamp 17:57 exactly.. the curve away from the viewpoint is totally clear. You can actually see the curve of the earth. Screenshot it, and you can see the curve. The axis of the turbines dips. The weedline dips. You can actually see the earth curve away.
You can see the curve of the earth, Humm, how are 7 objects all rising up above the horizon line, in a prospective line and reflecting in the sea. from 2ft above the water, LOL different distances and heights from the observer.
Weed line reduces due to prospective, see 34.54 turbines reduce in height, as will the tide line, weed line.
This shot is approx. 3m from the water.
google wind turbines on a clear day. no curve.
timestamp 24:14... I can see the curve.
You see no curve , thats it, what's the explanation for 7 objects all rising above the horizon, from a different height and distance, seen in a line and, reflected in the sea.
With all respect to your theory, what is under the disc?
What disc, don't know anyone who thinks we are on a disc.
@@KryptonitePhysics the flat earth.
@@richardm123uk it's not a disc in space, what's under it, no idea, the deepest hole ever drilled is 8miles, so know one knows.
All theories, Inc in the globe model.
@@RegebroRepairs The video only mentions the globe.
The physics of seeing the 6 turbines and the ship is imposable on a globe.
Your argument is nonsense.
@@KryptonitePhysics "The physics of seeing the 6 turbines and the ship is imposable on a globe."
Prove that it's impossible. Anyone can just claim whatever. Prove it.
Mahalo
noʻu ka hauʻoli
The funny thing about you fe people is that a few of you believes that only you, amongst millions of scientists have the answer and the evidence of a fe. Still not a single photo of a ice wall, dome or a flat earth is provided. The map you show from time to time is based on the globe model. Go and make your own that works with seasons, eclipses and other celestial observations.
Lol, you start with the globe mode, you are told you live on first, is it truth, is it a belief?
Turns out it's a belief, re enforced by Disney CGI, you fall for.
Evedance in your face your not on a ball.
Now go look and find out what it is
The globe model doesn't work, 🙈 🙉 is not a good look.
Actually the globe model works perfectly. You saying it doesn't just isn't enough
@@joecantdance494 look at the physics, understand the physics, then go look for curve with your own eyes
@@KryptonitePhysics I'm a ESA astro trainee. I've seen some cool stuff from strato and tropo altitude. And just to be clear here, I'm not in the conspiracy. Nothing to hide. And the dome and the ice wall was nowhere to be seen.
@@Xeegar well that's it then, a person with no content on their channel what so ever, has convinced me.
Nicely done. At 5.37 the reduction of the black underside of each windmill gives good evidence that there is less to see from the underside. Good evidence for the globe.😂
No reduction, watch the video before commenting is a good idea. Your confirmation bias is kicking in at the first opportunity.
@@user-le7ps2vn9z Nothing is hiding it, its in full view, compressed and stretched.
See transformation of ship, going into layer.
What happens to the top of the ship..
Compressed and stretched image.
@@user-le7ps2vn9z The horizon is in front of turbine 1, so its not the horizon.
What hid it, lol
The horizon that's Infront of turbine 1. How's that work.
@@user-le7ps2vn9z another 30 40min video
so what happens if you can never zoom back into something no matter how far you zoom in 🤔how does that work on the FE
28:58 so why no filter on the camera because im sure the moon there aint really fuzzy and that now is it
29:37 once again no filter to remove the glare, 🤔why no filter they are easy to get and everything, so when its less humid it reduces in size right which then would make it set earlier right 🤔so how much earlier? 10 seconds earlier or maybe 10 mins earlier
33:27 great so 100 volts per meter so if we go up to 100 meters high with this calculation there should be 100,000 volts 🤔so then 1000 meters is 1,000,000 volts 🤔that is a lot of volts
Go do some research on atmospheric electricity.
How can 7 objects, 6 turbines and a ship, all at different distances, all at different and lower heights from observer, all rise at different levels to come above the observers view.
then reflect in the sea.
As with the end section showing prospective, lets say you are at full zoom, can you see further than the last turbines in viwe, maybe a little, then NO,
Why, things get smaller in size due to distance.
If I hold a needled up, can you zoom into the eye of the needle no matter how far it is. Nope, Same thing.
@@KryptonitePhysics
1. i have done some research
2. that didnt answer the question unless only FEer are allowed to ask question on how no matter how far you zoom in you cant always bring the bottom of ships and that back into view 🤔
@@KryptonitePhysics so why from like 5 times zoom up to like 80 times zoom you dont see more of the ship 🤔if you want to see what i mean look up "Does More Zoom Cause Ships to Come Up Over Horizon? Flat Earth" or if you want i can send the link, because if its just prospective then you should be able to see more of the ship right so why cant we
In this observation, the ship base is reduced due to the lensing effect.
You can not zoom in and change the effect you see.
awesome
Pls forgive my poor English. I just found and subscribed to your channel, awesome information and I love it, thank you. I wish many more channels like yours would be around. If they are, they are difficult to find as youtube seems to give the opposite of my search inquiry on this topic. I found you through Taboo Conspiracy btw. I just searched for zetetic astronomy, then zetetic history and finally zetetic world view and they all gave me nothing of the sort but a lot of videos about why the world isn't the way we know it is and nothing about zetetic anything, which makes me seriously doubt youtube employees integrity. I already knew that searching for fe channels directly was a waste of time so I thought I try to find some like that. If anyone can share some links that would be highly appreciated.
www.youtube.com/@FlatEarthDavidWeiss/videos try this one
Learn the truth and meet like minded people near you. Get the Flat Earth Sun, Moon & Zodiac Clock app by Blue Water Bay qrco.de/bbizVA
This is not zetetic. Flat earthers start with the conclusion and look for evidence. That's the opposite of zetetic.
@@RegebroRepairs Really wrong, they start in the same frame of mind as you, Its a globe dont be daft.
I
was a space buff, Watched the moon landing, built a model of every Apollo craft
, watched starwars 5 times, loved space films. books looked into the physics of space and on and on.
I then look for evidence its a globe.
Other than nasa, dodgy images and CGI there is nothing, I have looked and looked and looked.
Nothing that stands up. Nothing.
Moon landings took about a day to debunk.
Globe a few weeks.
Everything that works on a globe works on the FE. everything.
You see no curve of water. Have a P900 again I spent many days looking for a curve, every holiday every trip. no curve.
@@KryptonitePhysics Thanks for the reply and sorry for it taking me a long time to respond. I wasn't notified until @RegebroRepairs commented a few hours ago which just confirms again how youtube is messing things up for anyone doing this research. I loved your comment btw. and the same is true for me. By now I've spent countless hours making observations and researching this topic. I started out in 2017 firmly convicted I could easily debunk all this "nonsense" but quickly found out that was easier said than done. Like so many others I got myself some equipment, I got myself a Nikon p900 camera and a Celestron Nexstar Evolution 9.25 telescope and a roll with sunfilter-foil. The moon landings sort of debunked themselves. Based on the available research and docs already available I quickly realised it was all a big hoax. But even by that point, having realised Nasa was lying, I still kept believing their other lies and told myself they had lied because of the cold war. But once I started making personal observations, like observing the sun through a sunfilter and observing what it actually looked like, like nothing I had been shown up until that point, with the clouds passing behind it and how it cast shadows upwards, my entire worldview started changing. During the summer of 2018, I videorecorded undeniable evidence for the fe sun and uploaded a 40 sec clip on my channel a.o. for anyone interested. Feel free to take a look. Since that summer of 2018 I have known for sure we are told a lot of bs, and the powers that be are behind it, knowing very well what the truth is. I researched my way through Admiral Byrd's expeditions and the following military operations, like operation fishbowl and whatnot. I have also gone through the "100 Reasons Why The Earth is Flat" point by point, and I agree. And there is a lot of factual evidence out there, like how the horizon rises with the observer etc, but nothing could have prepared for the amazing experience it was to observe the sun as it actually is. The cartoonish CGI version we are served in main steam media is nothing like what we see in reality. And the sunspots too are awesome. Because we can only observe a small part in the light spectrum, between infra-red and ultra-violet the suns outer edge at the bottom is reddish and the outer edge on top is bluish/violetish. The interesting part was to see how the sunspots are showing the opposite qualities with red tops and violet/blue bottoms and it's very clear in my photographs especially. Anyway, Im ranting on and Im digressing, sorry. I hope you have time to take a look at the 40 sec clip on my channel, I called it impossible shadows, feel free to use whatever you like if anything. These days Im making a new video with mainly the photographs and some background music, hoping Im done by the end of this month. I can never thank you guys enough for having opened my eyes and for enduring me and my comments until I got it. Thank you.
Water is the simple thing that always reminds me the globe model is likely to be false. Yet all flat models have plenty of problems too.
Water responds to forces applied to it, just like everything else, so there's no issue.
You are correct though that the flat earth 'model' has lots of flaws. It's how we can easily show that the flat earth doesn't exist.
Why would water make the globe model false?
"Yet all flat models have plenty of problems too."
Like the lack of sunsets? That should be enough to get you to stop taking all modern flat earth models seriously. None of them have sunsets. Real flat earthers will claim that sunsets doesn't happen in reality either, which I find amazingly hilarious. Imagine pretending you have never seen a sunset. That really takes a special kind of mind.
If you ever get the chance to visit the East Coast of England there are plenty more wind turbines to film.
And every film of them will prove that the earth is a globe, just like this one.
@@RegebroRepairs Ok, you come and see for yourself if you're so sure.
@@eyesopen1244 Do you think the East Coast of England is special and different from other coasts? That the water somehow is flat there, but nowhere else?
Because everywhere else I have been to a coast and checked, it has turned out that the ocean curves down. So my guess is that it's the same at the East Coast of England.
@@RegebroRepairs So how come I can see the bottoms of wind turbines more than 15 miles away?
@@eyesopen1244 How far you can see depends on your altitude and on the weather. And, if you are on a high enough altitude (thousands of feet), on atmospheric haze.
If the earth was flat, it would ONLY depend on atmospheric haze, and you would NEVER have a sharp horizon when you zoomed in.
Flat earth does not work, even the tinies little bit. It can't explain anything.
Remember: According to modern flat earthers, THERE ARE NO SUNSETS.
Have you seen a sunset?