_"Working People"_ just means _"people who earn a substantial majority of their income through labour"_ surely? So not pensioners, people on benefits, or people who mostly live off passive income from investments.
Though yes, it's rather vague. For example: What about a homemaker who depends on their partner's income? What about someone who could afford to retire or take a sabbatical, but chooses to work part time?
![ไข้ขึ้นเลย! เมื่อแฝดโดนจัดเต็มวัคซีนครบ2เดือน🤒 [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.54 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z2VHItnyyvY/mqdefault.jpg)
So nice that they are all having a spiffing time while the country turns to dust.😊
Starmer is in charge. That means all humour is cancelled. Along with manifesto promises.
Nice touch at the end. If Maybot turned up for a dance I may die from laughter. What a way to go out. 💙
A good speaker of wisdom.
Tories arguing with Oasis.
_"Working People"_ just means _"people who earn a substantial majority of their income through labour"_ surely? So not pensioners, people on benefits, or people who mostly live off passive income from investments.
Though yes, it's rather vague. For example: What about a homemaker who depends on their partner's income? What about someone who could afford to retire or take a sabbatical, but chooses to work part time?
WQill someone explain just how this common wealth works?
Both despicable people
Listening to these two presenters - you'd think that Labour had tanked the economy already - let's wait for the budget before casting judgement.
Ang knocked Dowdy Dowden for 6. About time Ang took over from Starmar and put some socialism back into Labour.
None labour answers questions.dont know how to