Thank you very much! That might be the case in theory… but I would never wear a 36 mm watch… Over the last decades I got used to > 40 mm watches and I like them…
I personally own a Rolex explorer TT 36mm and bought it from AD here in Florida USA for $11750+ tax. Gave away my Daytona Cosmograph (too busy dial) and Explorer SS (date )to my son. In today's smartphone world date is a nuisance on mechanical watches. Class, elegance, prestige, value, dress and sports watch, accuracy of -15 seconds per month (purchased on Jan 23). No other watch for me for the rest of my life. (70 years old). Got it after 2 years of waiting from AD. The best watch in the world for prestige and value. Ahhh the feeling of happiness. 💯🤔👍
After watching the video and reading the comments, I feel a number of people are missing the mark re this watch. The purpose of the release is to symbolise the coming home of the explorer, it is reverting back to its original size. The watch is aimed at true enthusiasts who celebrate the coming home of the explorer and applaud the reasoning behind the rolex decision. Its nothing to do with making the watch appeal to asians or woman, that is absurd. This is a very special piece. If you can't appreciate it, your best to stay away.
That might all be the case and true - in theory… The markets though have other rules … they are more commercial, more rational and for sure less emotional…
@@WatchAdvisor let's talk again in 6 months or so when some data is available on whether more woman than men are buying this watch. I have heard of a number of men either being lucky enough to get it..or are waiting in a list. I haven't heard of any woman buying it or even wanting it. There is always room for sentiment....emotional attachments etc. We are human after all.
You don’t seem to read lots of comments on our channel… if you did you would know that I am a very strong proponent of emotions/emotional buying and not rationality… But in this case (as in almost all Rolex cases) I think decisions are purely made rational… Rolex is being treated like a share, like filthy lucre…
I love this watch Sir David Attenborough wore this watch for many years he is one of my heroes, i will buy this watch on his birthday in May he will be 97 years young and still exploring! :)
I have the same size wrist as you and I was concerned abt the smaller size but decided to put my name down for one with my AD whilst letting them know I wasn't sure about the size. I tried it on and I felt like it was perfect, I've had it 3 weeks now and it has barely left my wrist. The dial face is the same size as a new GMT but it doesn't have all the other stuff around it, the size is just right. Once I'd worn it for a while, when I put my other watches on they seem brick like, I bet if you wore that watch for a week you would really see something more than you see after a quick try. The Explorer is meant to be this size, I'm a fairly large guy with wrists the same size as yours and it wears great, it so comfortable as well because of the taper and it feels like you are wearing a watch on a leather strap not a bracelet. In my view they really have made their best version of this watch yet, the true black gloss dial works so much better than the 39mm one that had a not quite matte, not quite gloss dial. To me at least this version is near perfect. The AR coating makes a surprising difference to the dial compared to other watches from theirs that don't have it, it's taken them so long to start using AR coating but it's definitely made a difference. Regarding the size change, I appreciate the fact that they didn't just use the OP case and bracelet etc, they've actually designed this from the ground up as its own watch which they could easily have not done. There has been a problem for a good while in their catalogue because they offered the OP 39, Explorer, Airking and Milgauss all in the same kinda 39/40mm time only space. By moving the OP up and the Explorer down it leaves room in the middle for a new Airking or Milgauss or both in 2022. I'm betting whichever it is comes in both black and white dial colours as the old OP white dial went. Possibly the Milgauss might just go altogether as all watches are now so anti magnetic but I bet we see a new time only watch from Rolex in the professional category at 39/40mm next year. Many watch YTers are expecting a larger Explorer, they wont do this, there is no other professional watch in their line up that comes in different sizes, I bet we see a revamped Airking next year. Also in 2023 the Explorer is 70 years old (as is the sub) what are the odds they will do a full gold version or maybe a platinum version with an ice blue dial of the Explorer. That could be very cool! Anyway great vid, thanks! Sorry for the boring Rolex spiel, I like lots of other brands too! ;)
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us, this is an interesting read... Concerning the size I cant go back to such a size after wearing > 40 mm for decades now... It might fit well and also look good for others, but not for me... What Rolex did with the Explorer was the right move and I do not expect bigger version to follow, just as you wrote. Why should the y do this? Makes no sense! All the rest is pure speculation... you hardly can predict what Rolex is going to do even if there is an anniversary coming... Rolex ticks different! 😉
@@WatchAdvisor Of course its speculation, around the platinum or gold specials for anniversaries especially. However we know which watches haven't moved to the "little crown at 6" and which watches have, the ones not having been done are getting less and less. The Daytona was face lifted not that long ago compared with the Milgauss and Airking, its gotta be there turn very soon. Maybe the SkyDweller as its 10 next year too? Its kinda fun to talk about and then never see the watches in store lol!
I have the Explorer 1 ref 114270 36mm it's my favorite size and it's the original size .I don't understand when I hear it's small when Ian Fleming who was over 6ft and James Gandolfini from the Sopranos wore a 36mm President NO PROBLEM
There are alot of haters out there who think just because they like larger watches, everyone should. Its a great watch, for those who love what it represents. Personally I think if someone thinks a 36mm watch says anything about a man's masculinity, they are a very insecure person with emotional issues which should be addressed
@@StruanRobertson29 ha ha well put 👏 and the 36mm has been around FOREVER unlike the 39mm that got discontinued. The 36 stood the test of time. 34mm is a little to small for me but 36mm is perfect and I'm 6ft
@@StruanRobertson29 The Explorer 1 36mm is LEGENDARY nothing less nothing more 🙌 its pure class and a sports watch at its finest. Now I'm hearing they want a 41mm Explorer 1 when does it end 😂
I tried the steel version of the Explorer 36 several times and it didn’t click. Luckily the AD had a TT version on stock and I tried that one. It was love on first sight. For my tiny wrist the most wearable Rolex sports model. It moved in this s week 😍
I own the 36mm - it's the perfect size. Makes my Seamaster 300m just look silly now. It's always been a classic, subtle and well-balanced size for men. We haven't doubled in bone structure over recent years; it's just that tastes have become flashy and more ostentatious. Thankfully, people are pushing back against this now.
@@WatchAdvisor I have not yet seen the new one in person unfortunately. I would not be opposed to sporting it in 36mm though. Do you feel 36 is too small?
I agree with you Alexander. The new Explorer is really very small. People think it wears like a 36mm Datejust, but in fact I believe it wears more like an old 34mm Oyster Date. To each his own, but I won the 39 and will be keeping it!
Starting off in the early 90's wearing small 34mm - 36mm watches. Then going with the times wearing to 40mm - 42mm sizes for 20 years. When I put on a 36mm it just looks and wears very small. It takes time to get use to a small watch on the wrist. I cannot see how men use to wear 28mm - 34mm watches back in the 1900's.
I had the opportunity to buy the two-tone version from my AD. I got it and really like it a lot! I wanted the stainless version (like everybody else) but settled for the two-tone. I am glad I did, it looks and feels spectacular!!! Excellent review, the best one yet IMO.
@@WatchAdvisor sure, the proportion are much better than in 39mm version. In fact I had the 39mm on my wrist and I discarded it, I was thinking on buying the 114270 second hand until Rolex announced this new 124270, I bought it 3 months ago.
Alexanda, thank you for all the honest, detailed and brilliant reviews. You speak the truth, regardless of what brand and help us all make our watch buying decsions.
Alexander, I know Rolex is way overexposed on this medium, but I still prefer the 39mm! But I’m also happy to see Rolex scale down the watch to the proper and heritage size of 36mm.
Excellent video, clear shots with lots of details. I appreciate your advice to not feed the flipper/grey market, I’d never buy over retail but clearly lots of people do. But we need to get used to it. The new Rolex AD model is to sell most of their watches at retail to closely affiliated middlemen, then get a kickback, or more likely the “middleman” is actually a shell company of the AD, with the middleman/AD raking in the excess profits from selling at the market price. And to sell to whales who will buy overpriced jewelry and slow selling watches. 36mm rules it out for my 18.5 cm wrist anyway. Why did they shrink the size? Only Rolex knows, but the Asian market, primarily China including HK, is the most important region for luxury goods, period, full stop. Everything else is just icing on the profit cake, even small-wristed enthusiasts.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us! I do agree with all your wrote and I have been pointing this out in dozens of comments before. It is GREEDY business! Only Rolex can stop it by introducing one official and total transparent waiting list hosted on the official Rolex website. Then the watches will go to those who really want to buy and wear them. The more people requesting to buy one, the more Rolex should allocate the watches to the waiting list and not ADs. It is the client then who should choose whom is going to deliver the watch to him. Even a factory/platform pick-up should be possible. If you want to control this you can. It only has to be done. What actually happens simply is a joke. It is GREEDY business! It is extra money making and should be stopped asap!
Great review. I like the Explorer - a tough, do it all watch. Versatile and not too shouty. But something is not quite right with this iteration. I think the proportions of the watch face have been improved from the 39, but it seems a bit small - smaller than a true 36mm? The bracelet taper is too much. Maybe the ideal size would be 38mm? Surely 41mm would look too gawky with poor proportions. In any case, impossible to get. Yawn. Omega could so easily trump this watch with a fully brushed 38mm Aqua Terra. Tudor did, with the BB36.
For me it is primarily the size that is not ok… 36 mm today - at least for me - are too small… but I think this is an attractive offer for e.g. Asians, youngsters and women…
Great video as always, thank you. This watch is terrific. Two niggles: wish it didnt have those two lines of text jammed under the logo (put Explorer back into the bottom text again please!)...and of course the standard gripe that no mortal will ever be able to buy one of these except at 2x list price from gray dealers.
Great detailed video! Been waiting for this for a while. I actually noticed something I didn't see anyone point out yet. On the crown of the oyster steel version, there is a line underneath the coronet. However, on the Rolesor version, it is two dots instead. Hardly a meaningful difference, but something interesting I spotted.
The line under the crown indicates it is a Twinlock crown in stainless steel. Two dots (and not 3 dots for a Triplock crown) again indicated it is a Twinlock crown with precious metal. If it was a Triplock Gold crown it is 3 dots with the middle dot larger and a Triplock Platinum crown like the 116506 Platinum Daytona, the centre of the 3 dots is smaller to indicate the crown is Platinum.
@@GustapoGomez Triplock steel like on a GMT-Master II 126710BLRO/BLNR and Submariner 124060 Submariner Date 126610LN/LV are 3 dots of equal size on the end of the crown button.
Great video as usual! Talking about the tapering of the bracelet, do you see any big difference with the new Speedy bracelet? Is it similar to it? Trying to understand if it is really too much or not.
I don’t remember how the Speedy bracelet tappers … but for sure less…you will only get your answer if you can compare both watches on your wrist… numbers are just theoretical you need to experience the real thing…
I have a 16 cm wrist. I have always loved 36 mm the most. I also wear up to 42 mm with short lugs. I like the two tone version. On my short list for this year or next. Thanks as always for an excellent review!
The TT looks gorgeous in the flesh, pictures don't do justice. The gold bezel and oyster link is very toned down but pops up beautifully on lacquer finish black dial - 36mm is perfect for medium wrist like 6.5". But TT is 75% more expensive than SS - thanks to gold rally
Love your detailed review of my favourite Rolex watch Alex. When I got on the waitlist, only the 39mm was the size that Rolex made them in but the waiting period was a blessing in disguise because by the time my AD called me, Rolex had already launched the new Explorer in 36mm. I am so glad that Rolex went back to the original diameter of 36mm and I love my Explorer 1 and it will remain with me for life.
such a punch of stupid comments. are the people are jealous? in the whole range of rolex-sportwatches there is no 36mm rolex in the current line-up. actually only the 37mm yachtmaster is on the smaller side. i ve a 15mm wrist- its impossible for me to wear a larger watch then 38mm. it just looks stupid. i got the new explorer in steel directly from my ad, and it fits perfectly. i wish they downsice the gmt-master too to 38mm- even if its only one configuration. btw. rolex is a "stiftung"-i dont know the english word- and its all about exploring-sports and adventures- are the people really believe there are only males with "big" wrists in this field? rolex made a truly clever decision- give the smaller wrists a sporty, classy watch.
Same here. I have a 165mm wrist, so almost every sport watch isn't suitable for me. There are some guys with small wrists, why keeping them out of the market?
I keep my fingers crossed 🤞🏼 It is a song we licensed at “Premium Beats”. I am not in the office today … answering via my iPhone. … will tell you Sunday evening…
Props for the follow up and showing both on your wrist! I understand where you're coming from size and style wise, but honestly I think both (and even the two tone in particular) would look great on you for every day wear. Perhaps with a long sleeve shirt it'd tie it all together and wouldn't seem too small/feminine. But anyway, different strokes for different folks!
Great review! I have the 39mm and sold my old 36mm because it is too small for me. Yes, it is getting harder and almost impossible to collect Rolex watches nowadays because they're always 'sold out' at the authorized dealers.
The two tone looks very stylish. For me caucasian from transylvania we used to say amale or bear under 100kg is not the real deal, the watch is pretty small. But even though it is wearable for my 8 inch wrist. Recommend it for everybody it represents the pure rolex techonology and reliability
@@WatchAdvisor I know you’re a busy man, visiting the big brands, but there are several small brands whose actual value-for-money is extremely high and they are worthy of the attention of any fan of watches.
16:09. Great video and commentary, Alexander. Unfortunately in the US, we no longer have waiting lists. Patience is no longer enough. In the US, we have to compete in spending history among clients to be considered for a Rolex watch. (And no spending amount guarantees anything.) If I have to spend tens of thousands on diamonds to *maybe* be considered-not knowing who else is spending what-I like the guaranteed, overnight shipping from the grey dealers better. It is our ADs who have gotten greedy. When MSRP on today’s Breitlings is $8K, a steel Royal Oak MSRP is over $20K, and Patek MSRP for a new steel 5711 is $34K, aren’t Rolex MSRP set unrealistically low, creating the problem in the first place?
Interesting read! Thanks for sharing! It is a shame and only created - as you wrote - by greedy ADs… What a shame! Rolex is “only” meant to be a manufacturer. That’s what the Rolex foundation wants … the ADs are free to do what they want with the watches they get delivered… The only way to stop these greedy activities is to create an official waiting list handled/operated by Rolex … so everyone wanting a Rolex would exactly know when he gets his desired watch for retail price…
I measured 20 and 12 with a rule and reading was exactly this … maybe these are the correct sizes… no one will ever take of the bracelet and these 0,3 mm in thickness don’t make any difference at all…
@@WatchAdvisor my jubilee bracelet from a dj36 does not fit the lug width of the exp 1. These details matter. It is a key difference for this watch vs op36 or dj36.
@@WatchAdvisor thx for the reply. I just can tell what other youtubers say. The old explorer was famous of being a strap monster. Mainly because of the 20mm. So ist guess its important to others. Habe a nice day
@@spinaquanable Such tiny differences aren’t really visible with the naked eye … the old Explorer was a 39 mm watch the new one is a 36 mm …. This is what you see!
@@WatchAdvisor yeah.. might look weird with all that negative space on the dial though.. will probably look too big on your wrist.. shoot a video when you can get your hands on it pls..
@@WatchAdvisor Rolex either round up or down, for marketing purposes I guess. But if you run a calliper over any Rolex you'll see that they are not whole numbers
@@TheStenius I guess it depends if you plan on putting it on a strap? Rolex bracelets are icons really. I also don't think modern Rolex sports watches look good on straps. The solid end links and precise fit/integration into the case means Rolex adopt really sharp edges, which are exposed when on a third-party strap
The two-tone isn't popular today, but it'll be America's most wanted by Spring of '22 if not sooner. I said the same thing about the OP, the 39s, and the Exp2 so here we go again, "get'em before they're hot!" Good luck everyone! Thanks for the great vid!
After seeing a lotof watch community debates whether the current 36 is too small or perfect size I’m pretty sure rolex would best come out with a minor update of explorer36 with an actual diameter of 36.xx ,20 mm lug width and end all debates for a true perfect size rolex for all.
@@WatchAdvisor sorry for the late reply. I think a taper from 19 to 16 or even 20 to 16 would make a watch a little beefier even with the same 35-36mm case.
that's funny all the comments about the size, i think that's a big weakness point in many ways. ( FP Journe watches for instance are big and heavy). Nowadays even wearing a small tank in the streets of Paris is challenge. 36 is perfect for a sportwatch
Hi Alexander, how are you ? Gorgeous vidéo. Explorer is one of m'y Favorite whatch: true luxury is simplycity. Quality built is top notch too. 36 mm? I like it, it's différent and have more elegance for m'y taste. I consider that's a size for both women and men. I apreciate that Rolex keeps thé original size, After all, small is beautiful too. Congratulations for your work and expertise
I am fine, thanks for asking and sharing our passion! That 36 mm are of course mirroring a certain elegance and simplicity… and there is a trend for smaller watches also… for me personally too small…
A great watch! For women explorers and Asian men. It’s all about marketing to specific groups. And Rolex is king in marketing. So much so….good luck in even seeing one at an authorized dealer.
@@WatchAdvisor Youngsters? youngsters dont need £5.5k + watches they need to earn such things with age and maturity, job progression etc. Cant even say University because they shouldn't really be able to afford anything near a Rolex whilst being called a university student,( debts more like it and supernoodles for dinner) and by the time Rolex comes around they should definitely be called a man! A hard Working man who has earned that privilege. And also grown fully with manly arms and wrists hahahaha
Double excellent quality video in same day!! First of all i've confused why Explorer I decrease from 39 mm. to 36 mm. But anyway when you looking 36mm on your wrist is perfect than i thought i agree on black dial, perfect size on everyday wear. Thanks Alexander!
@@WatchAdvisor For current situation Rolex Explorer I 36mm. The price is +60 - 70% on gray market and can't find on the dealer for moment. that's answer is 36mm. famous than i thought.
I liked it up until I found out that the lug width is 19mm and not 20mm. I like to change out the bracelet for a leather or rubber tropic straps. (I feel 19mm is just too non standard) Why is Rolex always trying to make things so difficult? I am starting to get fed up with Rolex.
If you measure the case from 7 - 2 at the edge of the bezel. You’ll get 36mm. The bezel edge goes over slightly the case. When you measure the case (no bezel) the size is 35.5mm. Obviously try to use a digital caliper tool. Most people will assume the Explorer case at 36mm is the same case as an OP or Date Just… No, the Explorer case is somewhat sized a little different. It falls in between other 36mm Oyster cases. Rolex is very cleaver. They try to Frankenstein proof their watches.
Best reviews as usual. The Explorer 1 is just beautiful in its simplicity. But I have to agree with you, just way too small….unfortunately. Most of my watches are at 40mm, still 4mm make a huge differrnce.
The release of this watch has made me realize something. Obesity is a serious problem in the modern age. If a 36mm watch is too small for you, you're either trying to compensate or you seriously need to loose some weight and fix that fat wrist.
I weigh 71 / 72 kilos and I am 1,79 cm tall ... I have almost no body fat and I am top fit ... How much weight shall I loose my friend? Are you kidding? These 36 mm are too small for my 17 cm wrist! The Explorer looks like if it got lost there ...
So following your theory means that everyone with big wrists is fat? I’ve never heard anything this ignorant. Not everyone has girly arms with no muscle like you.
Personally I’m glad I collected the 39mm before it got discontinued. As for the two-tone, I really don’t see the point of it apart to appeal to a lady. Not for me at all. Thanks for the video. The explorer (214270) is the perfect watch period.
Sorry my mistake, I thought I was replying to a different TH-camr. I actually have the 2015 39mm version and this version ( 36mm ) 2022 version I wear them both but after you get used to the size, the 36mm slightly better in my opinion. My wrist is similar to yours in size
@@WatchAdvisor what I mean is you have it in one position and then you can either add five or subtract five millimetres. You cannot do plus AND minus five millimetres because that would be 1cm total length difference. ;-)
@@WatchAdvisor I know they reduced it from 39mm to 36mm. But there's no law to say they couldn't decide (next year or somewhen) to offer it in two sizes - both 36mm and 41mm.
I would definitely consider either one at 39mm. I'm also not overly negative on the steel gold version...all steel for outdoors and the steel gold for exploring the office, for those who still have an office, lol. I can accept 36mm on a true classic as it would be appropriate to the time. I believe Rolex was targeting women with this re-issue, although their timing was off considering women are now wearing 39-41mm nowadays.
I have the money in hand to buy a Rolex. Unfortunately I'm still on some "waitlist" for a Submariner (going on 2 years), and the new Explorer 36mm. I never got the call for the 39mm. I have AD purchase history but I won't kiss ass, waste money on jewelry/watches that I don't need, and waste time being fake person to AD reps just to get a watch.
You have to have purchase history with your AD unfortunately. You have to play the AD game or wait very very long time and even then you might not get the watch you want. Personally, I'm buying Tudor watches to build up purchase history and I've my name for Explorer II. Of course you can look at other brands as well. But the heart wants what it wants!
@@omarion07 I hear you, that's one way of doing it. As for myself I'm at an age where I have no time for games. The way I see it. I NEVER had to wait in line or pay for any VIP service at nightclubs LOL So I don't need to be on the other side of a horological velvet rope at an AD. You either want my business$$$ or not. At the end of the day it's just a watch. It doesn't make a man any more handsome or youthful. Fortunately a Rolex is one of the few goods that will last a lifetime, and truly retain it's value. Can't say that about any car, furniture, electronics, clothes, even most jewelry. The only reason I want to upgrade is because I don't want to wear my 5513 maxi dial Sub. It's had it's days since I first bought it used in the early 90's.
Great review. I really think Rolex should have retained the 39mm and branded / marketed this watch as a women's alternative, as it is mostly women who will end up wearing it. Congratulations on your message at the end of the video. I wish more TH-cam channels would also discourage people from buying these watches at vastly inflated prices. Unfortunately it seems there are a lot of very shady characters operating within the world of watches - some of them even have their own TH-cam channels!
Thanks for sharing our passion! Please do also watch our video of the new Explorer II we published yesterday… you will hear the same message at the end of the video. What these greedy ADs, their flippers and resellers do is a SHAME! The only way to stop this BS is to have an official waiting list provided by Rolex. Independent ADs will do what they want and not deliver the watches to those who really want and deserve them… It is greedy business and a shame!
@@WatchAdvisor Are you sure? In your first review video’s comment section, you mentioned 19mm. All review videos so far have measured the lug to lug as 19mm.
You should deposit your interest with several ADs … and be a little patient … But PLEASE don’t buy it for an overprice from one of the greedy resellers! There is an official list price and this is the correct price for the Explorer…
Hi Alex. Thanks was waiting for this video. The 36 is too small. I think it’s even smaller the. 114270 from 2009. Beautiful to look at but not for my 19cm wrist. It’s unfortunate the 39 is selling for such a premium. Maybe Rolex will add a 41 mm like everyone thought one day to line up with the OP. Oh and gold has no business being on one of the very first tool watches.
Great video but ruined it with the 36mm should've offered with the 39mm rather than instead of!!!! The bi metal version is just ridiculous and an own goal by Rolex!!!
They messed up moving "explorer" to the top of the dial and the font size/spacing. Just compare the new 36 and the 39 and the old, previous 36 side by side.
@@WatchAdvisor exactly as I said. My wife has tried it on and as I expected its too chunky a watch for her and is too big. But if that's what a particular woman wants she should go for it. I've seen a woman wearing a submariner as well....obviously a woman who likes quite a bulky piece
My local ad says rolex make far few explorer and we get 2-4 watches per year 🤣!! I made myself believe him 😂. We all know rolex at the best make 1 million watches which is huge and should cover all of us but there’s something wrong in between Geneva and the end consumer. Because no waay i can find tons of new 2021 models in nearest grey dealers while ADs are completely empty or full of dummy watches 😂. Why rolex silent about this and no official response even their fear of camera makes me more suspicious
My AD said exactly the same thing 1-2 watches per year for the Explorer and that they never managed to get one for everyone who had enquired about the previous 39mm model.
I’ve seen the new Explorer in both steel and two tone and it’s tiny. I think they are going for the boy’s entry level watch or a ladies weird two tone piece. The 39mm version was perfect, maybe they painted themselves into a corner with nowhere to go. Or maybe their design and creativity department are just resting on their laurels and have no idea what to do next. Overall it’s a pass from me and I’m guessing most man sized adults.
@@WatchAdvisor the Explorer has the best lume show of any Rolex. That’s the party piece. I’m tempted by a discontinued 39mm but I’d need to be 15 again for the 36mm to be a good fit.
@@WatchAdvisor Not at the same time unfortunately but separately and the new Explorer bracelet felt smaller then 20mm and the taper made it feel even smaller to me. Whereas the OP bracelet felt thicker (wider). Amazing what a tweak here and there can accomplish.
@@bobbycalifornia7077 each to their own. For the first 2 days I questioned how I felt about the taper...6 weeks later its not even a thing for me...I really like it
I sold my 39 because it always felt too small, no way I could manage this 36. 43 lug to lug is tiny (my sweet spot is about 50). Hopefully Rolex release a 41, so we could have the 36 for purists, small wrist guys and women, and a 41 for medium wrist and up guys.
Please do take some time and do also read the description of this video! I am looking forward reading your comments and answering your questions…
I think you’re mistaken on the lug width of this latest Explorer. It’s 19mm I believe, not 20mm.
That’s possible… I measured with a ruler… reading was 20… Anyhow no one will take that bracelet off…
Great video Alexander 👍 This is the first watch you’ve reviewed in awhile that actually fits your smaller wrist correct. Good stuff.
Thank you very much! That might be the case in theory… but I would never wear a 36 mm watch… Over the last decades I got used to > 40 mm watches and I like them…
I personally own a Rolex explorer TT 36mm and bought it from AD here in Florida USA for $11750+ tax. Gave away my Daytona Cosmograph (too busy dial) and Explorer SS (date )to my son. In today's smartphone world date is a nuisance on mechanical watches. Class, elegance, prestige, value, dress and sports watch, accuracy of -15 seconds per month (purchased on Jan 23). No other watch for me for the rest of my life. (70 years old). Got it after 2 years of waiting from AD. The best watch in the world for prestige and value. Ahhh the feeling of happiness. 💯🤔👍
Thanks for sharing, love your passion, your emotions! May your Explorer continue to always show you HAPPY seconds, minutes and hours…
After watching the video and reading the comments, I feel a number of people are missing the mark re this watch. The purpose of the release is to symbolise the coming home of the explorer, it is reverting back to its original size. The watch is aimed at true enthusiasts who celebrate the coming home of the explorer and applaud the reasoning behind the rolex decision. Its nothing to do with making the watch appeal to asians or woman, that is absurd. This is a very special piece. If you can't appreciate it, your best to stay away.
That might all be the case and true - in theory… The markets though have other rules … they are more commercial, more rational and for sure less emotional…
@@WatchAdvisor let's talk again in 6 months or so when some data is available on whether more woman than men are buying this watch. I have heard of a number of men either being lucky enough to get it..or are waiting in a list. I haven't heard of any woman buying it or even wanting it. There is always room for sentiment....emotional attachments etc. We are human after all.
You don’t seem to read lots of comments on our channel… if you did you would know that I am a very strong proponent of emotions/emotional buying and not rationality… But in this case (as in almost all Rolex cases) I think decisions are purely made rational… Rolex is being treated like a share, like filthy lucre…
@@WatchAdvisor no this is the first time I have viewed one of your videos.
Welcome to WatchAdvisor! I hope I could convince you to watch our videos and to pass by more often… 😉 Always let me know if you have any questions…
I was so underwhelmed when I saw this watch in person; good video.
What exactly didn’t you like?
@@WatchAdvisor I couldn’t get past the under size 36mm and the blandness if it’s look; you did a great review thanks
I hear you! Thanks for specifying!
I love this watch Sir David Attenborough wore this watch for many years he is one of my heroes, i will buy this watch on his birthday in May he will be 97 years young and still exploring! :)
Will you get yours exactly then? Or do you keep it at the AD until then?
Every collection needs a explorer what a elegant and sporty watch.
I personally would agree if it would be slightly bigger… 😉
@@WatchAdvisor yes I do too, that’s why my 39mm version will be with me till the end haha
12:19. This is the first watch I’ve seen you wear that fits your wrist.
Thanks for sharing! Well, I don’t agree… 😉
I have the same size wrist as you and I was concerned abt the smaller size but decided to put my name down for one with my AD whilst letting them know I wasn't sure about the size. I tried it on and I felt like it was perfect, I've had it 3 weeks now and it has barely left my wrist. The dial face is the same size as a new GMT but it doesn't have all the other stuff around it, the size is just right. Once I'd worn it for a while, when I put my other watches on they seem brick like, I bet if you wore that watch for a week you would really see something more than you see after a quick try. The Explorer is meant to be this size, I'm a fairly large guy with wrists the same size as yours and it wears great, it so comfortable as well because of the taper and it feels like you are wearing a watch on a leather strap not a bracelet. In my view they really have made their best version of this watch yet, the true black gloss dial works so much better than the 39mm one that had a not quite matte, not quite gloss dial. To me at least this version is near perfect. The AR coating makes a surprising difference to the dial compared to other watches from theirs that don't have it, it's taken them so long to start using AR coating but it's definitely made a difference.
Regarding the size change, I appreciate the fact that they didn't just use the OP case and bracelet etc, they've actually designed this from the ground up as its own watch which they could easily have not done. There has been a problem for a good while in their catalogue because they offered the OP 39, Explorer, Airking and Milgauss all in the same kinda 39/40mm time only space. By moving the OP up and the Explorer down it leaves room in the middle for a new Airking or Milgauss or both in 2022. I'm betting whichever it is comes in both black and white dial colours as the old OP white dial went. Possibly the Milgauss might just go altogether as all watches are now so anti magnetic but I bet we see a new time only watch from Rolex in the professional category at 39/40mm next year. Many watch YTers are expecting a larger Explorer, they wont do this, there is no other professional watch in their line up that comes in different sizes, I bet we see a revamped Airking next year. Also in 2023 the Explorer is 70 years old (as is the sub) what are the odds they will do a full gold version or maybe a platinum version with an ice blue dial of the Explorer. That could be very cool!
Anyway great vid, thanks! Sorry for the boring Rolex spiel, I like lots of other brands too! ;)
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us, this is an interesting read... Concerning the size I cant go back to such a size after wearing > 40 mm for decades now... It might fit well and also look good for others, but not for me... What Rolex did with the Explorer was the right move and I do not expect bigger version to follow, just as you wrote. Why should the y do this? Makes no sense! All the rest is pure speculation... you hardly can predict what Rolex is going to do even if there is an anniversary coming... Rolex ticks different! 😉
@@WatchAdvisor Of course its speculation, around the platinum or gold specials for anniversaries especially. However we know which watches haven't moved to the "little crown at 6" and which watches have, the ones not having been done are getting less and less. The Daytona was face lifted not that long ago compared with the Milgauss and Airking, its gotta be there turn very soon. Maybe the SkyDweller as its 10 next year too? Its kinda fun to talk about and then never see the watches in store lol!
I have the Explorer 1 ref 114270 36mm it's my favorite size and it's the original size .I don't understand when I hear it's small when Ian Fleming who was over 6ft and James Gandolfini from the Sopranos wore a 36mm President NO PROBLEM
Of course this is not a problem! Tastes are different… 😉
There are alot of haters out there who think just because they like larger watches, everyone should. Its a great watch, for those who love what it represents. Personally I think if someone thinks a 36mm watch says anything about a man's masculinity, they are a very insecure person with emotional issues which should be addressed
@@StruanRobertson29 ha ha well put 👏 and the 36mm has been around FOREVER unlike the 39mm that got discontinued. The 36 stood the test of time. 34mm is a little to small for me but 36mm is perfect and I'm 6ft
@@lonewolfemcquade8133 I'm with you. I tried on a 34mm OP before I decided in the explorer....34mm just wasn't for me..
@@StruanRobertson29 The Explorer 1 36mm is LEGENDARY nothing less nothing more 🙌 its pure class and a sports watch at its finest. Now I'm hearing they want a 41mm Explorer 1 when does it end 😂
I tried the steel version of the Explorer 36 several times and it didn’t click. Luckily the AD had a TT version on stock and I tried that one. It was love on first sight. For my tiny wrist the most wearable Rolex sports model. It moved in this s week 😍
Congratulation! May your Explorer always show you happy seconds, minutes and hours....
I own the 36mm - it's the perfect size. Makes my Seamaster 300m just look silly now. It's always been a classic, subtle and well-balanced size for men. We haven't doubled in bone structure over recent years; it's just that tastes have become flashy and more ostentatious. Thankfully, people are pushing back against this now.
Thanks for sharing! It is true what you write, but I doubt that sizes will diminish that much…
Fantastic watch. I have the 214270 and the explorer has become one of my favorite watches
Now the new one is 3 mm smaller... would be interesting to know if you still like that size...
@@WatchAdvisor I have not yet seen the new one in person unfortunately. I would not be opposed to sporting it in 36mm though. Do you feel 36 is too small?
@@watchdork For me it is too small… but I like big watches, so maybe I am not objective enough…
@@WatchAdvisor The watch looks great on you but I totally get it!
I agree with you Alexander. The new Explorer is really very small. People think it wears like a 36mm Datejust, but in fact I believe it wears more like an old 34mm Oyster Date. To each his own, but I won the 39 and will be keeping it!
Tastes are different! One will like it one not... for me ... too small...
No idea why they don’t do both. I much prefer the 36mm but why not have both.
Starting off in the early 90's wearing small 34mm - 36mm watches. Then going with the times wearing to 40mm - 42mm sizes for 20 years. When I put on a 36mm it just looks and wears very small. It takes time to get use to a small watch on the wrist. I cannot see how men use to wear 28mm - 34mm watches back in the 1900's.
I had the opportunity to buy the two-tone version from my AD. I got it and really like it a lot! I wanted the stainless version (like everybody else) but settled for the two-tone. I am glad I did, it looks and feels spectacular!!! Excellent review, the best one yet IMO.
Thanks for sharing! Congratulations! May your Explorer continue to always show you happy seconds, minutes and hours…
Very thorough and well done review. Thanks for doing this. I am looking into this and wouldn’t mind either version!
I happy to read this! Thank you very much! Let me know if you have any questions...
The best Rolex,
Also in this size?
@@WatchAdvisor it looks great on your wrist,
That is the perfect size for me
@@WatchAdvisor sure, the proportion are much better than in 39mm version. In fact I had the 39mm on my wrist and I discarded it, I was thinking on buying the 114270 second hand until Rolex announced this new 124270, I bought it 3 months ago.
For me too small, but tastes are different ... Therefore: Bravo! Good choice! May your Explorer always show you HAPPY seconds, minutes and hours ...
It is too small for my wrist! Jus my two cents!
The lug width should be 19mm right? Quite a lot of reviewers have mentioned that.
Apparently it should be 19 - yes!
@@WatchAdvisor 👍🏼👏🏼
A classic, I own the 214270 MKII version in 39mm.
May it always show you happy seconds, minutes and hours! 😉
Great video ! and great music very nice!
Love your feedback! Thank you 🙏🏻 What about the Explorer? Do you like it?
Sehr schönes Review mir sind sie zu klein da fand ich die 39mm der alten besser. Aber trotzdem schöne Uhren und toll von ihnen präsentiert.
Danke fürs Feedback! Mir gefiel auch die 39mm besser… 🤷🏻♂️
Alexanda, thank you for all the honest, detailed and brilliant reviews. You speak the truth, regardless of what brand and help us all make our watch buying decsions.
Thanks for your super kind feedback! I love it! Always let me know if you have a question....
Alexander, I know Rolex is way overexposed on this medium, but I still prefer the 39mm! But I’m also happy to see Rolex scale down the watch to the proper and heritage size of 36mm.
Rolex is for sure not overexposed on our channel… we only do something when there is something tell/show… I do also prefer the 39mm! 😉
Amazing video congrats!!
Which one is your favorite? Oystersteel or Rolesor?
This is a big question maybe the rolesor is my favourite, but not for the budget so I think i’ll go for the oystersteel
@@emiliodigironimo6513 Thanks for sharing!
Excellent video, clear shots with lots of details. I appreciate your advice to not feed the flipper/grey market, I’d never buy over retail but clearly lots of people do. But we need to get used to it. The new Rolex AD model is to sell most of their watches at retail to closely affiliated middlemen, then get a kickback, or more likely the “middleman” is actually a shell company of the AD, with the middleman/AD raking in the excess profits from selling at the market price. And to sell to whales who will buy overpriced jewelry and slow selling watches.
36mm rules it out for my 18.5 cm wrist anyway. Why did they shrink the size? Only Rolex knows, but the Asian market, primarily China including HK, is the most important region for luxury goods, period, full stop. Everything else is just icing on the profit cake, even small-wristed enthusiasts.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us! I do agree with all your wrote and I have been pointing this out in dozens of comments before. It is GREEDY business! Only Rolex can stop it by introducing one official and total transparent waiting list hosted on the official Rolex website. Then the watches will go to those who really want to buy and wear them. The more people requesting to buy one, the more Rolex should allocate the watches to the waiting list and not ADs. It is the client then who should choose whom is going to deliver the watch to him. Even a factory/platform pick-up should be possible. If you want to control this you can. It only has to be done. What actually happens simply is a joke. It is GREEDY business! It is extra money making and should be stopped asap!
Great video!
Too small for me; 38 or 39mm are much better. I prefer the Expl. Il.
Too small for me too … as mentioned in the video…
Great review. I like the Explorer - a tough, do it all watch. Versatile and not too shouty. But something is not quite right with this iteration. I think the proportions of the watch face have been improved from the 39, but it seems a bit small - smaller than a true 36mm? The bracelet taper is too much. Maybe the ideal size would be 38mm? Surely 41mm would look too gawky with poor proportions. In any case, impossible to get. Yawn. Omega could so easily trump this watch with a fully brushed 38mm Aqua Terra. Tudor did, with the BB36.
For me it is primarily the size that is not ok… 36 mm today - at least for me - are too small… but I think this is an attractive offer for e.g. Asians, youngsters and women…
Great video as always, thank you. This watch is terrific. Two niggles: wish it didnt have those two lines of text jammed under the logo (put Explorer back into the bottom text again please!)...and of course the standard gripe that no mortal will ever be able to buy one of these except at 2x list price from gray dealers.
Blame the ADs selling to their flippers and resellers instead of us normal watch collectors and passionates … it is greedy business and it is a shame!
Great detailed video! Been waiting for this for a while. I actually noticed something I didn't see anyone point out yet. On the crown of the oyster steel version, there is a line underneath the coronet. However, on the Rolesor version, it is two dots instead. Hardly a meaningful difference, but something interesting I spotted.
The line under the crown indicates it is a Twinlock crown in stainless steel. Two dots (and not 3 dots for a Triplock crown) again indicated it is a Twinlock crown with precious metal. If it was a Triplock Gold crown it is 3 dots with the middle dot larger and a Triplock Platinum crown like the 116506 Platinum Daytona, the centre of the 3 dots is smaller to indicate the crown is Platinum.
Always has been like that between steel & precious metals
@@GustapoGomez Triplock steel like on a GMT-Master II 126710BLRO/BLNR and Submariner 124060 Submariner Date 126610LN/LV are 3 dots of equal size on the end of the crown button.
@@andrewholt3849 Thanks for the explanation! Learned something new!
@@christopherliang6879 I think it’s accurate. If you get the Rolex catalogues they explain it periodically and a price list for your country.
Great video as usual! Talking about the tapering of the bracelet, do you see any big difference with the new Speedy bracelet? Is it similar to it? Trying to understand if it is really too much or not.
I don’t remember how the Speedy bracelet tappers … but for sure less…you will only get your answer if you can compare both watches on your wrist… numbers are just theoretical you need to experience the real thing…
@@WatchAdvisor Grazie Alexander. Come sempre :) You know that is not easy to have the chance to try these guys on...
Hopefully my 2nd Rolex Watch 💙🙏🏻
Have you ordered it?
I have a 16 cm wrist. I have always loved 36 mm the most. I also wear up to 42 mm with short lugs.
I like the two tone version. On my short list for this year or next. Thanks as always for an excellent review!
You are very welcome! Let me know if you have any questions…
The TT looks gorgeous in the flesh, pictures don't do justice. The gold bezel and oyster link is very toned down but pops up beautifully on lacquer finish black dial - 36mm is perfect for medium wrist like 6.5". But TT is 75% more expensive than SS - thanks to gold rally
Thanks for sharing! Do you actually own one?
Finally a 36 mm!
Oystersteel or Rolesor?
@@WatchAdvisor Oystersteel all the way!
I would wear the steel version on my 18.5cm wrist with no problem at all. Best regards Oni
Why not! Only you decide… no one else… 👍🏼
@@WatchAdvisor Das ist der Punkt. 😁👍
@@onifrakimarq7663 Yep 👍🏼
Love your detailed review of my favourite Rolex watch Alex. When I got on the waitlist, only the 39mm was the size that Rolex made them in but the waiting period was a blessing in disguise because by the time my AD called me, Rolex had already launched the new Explorer in 36mm. I am so glad that Rolex went back to the original diameter of 36mm and I love my Explorer 1 and it will remain with me for life.
Thanks for sharing our passion! Sometimes waiting makes sense as it seems… 😝 When will you now get it?
@@WatchAdvisor I got it last November and paid the old price, so that's another bonus! 😁
I have. It is 19mm
Too small for my taste. However, do love the 39mm watch. My favorite daily watch
The 39 mm with the long & correct hands is the one to have… YES!
such a punch of stupid comments. are the people are jealous? in the whole range of rolex-sportwatches there is no 36mm rolex in the current line-up. actually only the 37mm yachtmaster is on the smaller side. i ve a 15mm wrist- its impossible for me to wear a larger watch then 38mm. it just looks stupid. i got the new explorer in steel directly from my ad, and it fits perfectly. i wish they downsice the gmt-master too to 38mm- even if its only one configuration. btw. rolex is a "stiftung"-i dont know the english word- and its all about exploring-sports and adventures- are the people really believe there are only males with "big" wrists in this field? rolex made a truly clever decision- give the smaller wrists a sporty, classy watch.
Stiftung = foundation… Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us!
@@WatchAdvisor and btw. there is even a 41 black op with only little differences.
Same here. I have a 165mm wrist, so almost every sport watch isn't suitable for me. There are some guys with small wrists, why keeping them out of the market?
I will receive the explorer 36 probably next year, from my local ad. Nice video and nice music, name of the song please.
I keep my fingers crossed 🤞🏼 It is a song we licensed at “Premium Beats”. I am not in the office today … answering via my iPhone. … will tell you Sunday evening…
@@WatchAdvisor thank you, very nice song for a very nice watch.
Props for the follow up and showing both on your wrist! I understand where you're coming from size and style wise, but honestly I think both (and even the two tone in particular) would look great on you for every day wear. Perhaps with a long sleeve shirt it'd tie it all together and wouldn't seem too small/feminine. But anyway, different strokes for different folks!
I got used to wear bigger sizes… to be precise >40 mm 🤷🏻♂️ Now these 36 mm just look a bit lost on my wrist… 😆
Great review! I have the 39mm and sold my old 36mm because it is too small for me. Yes, it is getting harder and almost impossible to collect Rolex watches nowadays because they're always 'sold out' at the authorized dealers.
Thank you! I know, what a shame... Still try to be patient and do not buy over price..
The two tone looks very stylish. For me caucasian from transylvania we used to say amale or bear under 100kg is not the real deal, the watch is pretty small. But even though it is wearable for my 8 inch wrist. Recommend it for everybody it represents the pure rolex techonology and reliability
This Explorer is very small indeed… not sure if it should be on a bigger man’s wrist …
@@WatchAdvisor muhammad ali wore a 32mm cartier. Its all preference. If you like it, wear it.
Really? Hot 🥵!
This is why I spent £200 on the San Martin. When I realise it’s too small I won’t have spent much and won’t regret the purchase.
What is “San Martin” can you please specify?
@@WatchAdvisor I know you’re a busy man, visiting the big brands, but there are several small brands whose actual value-for-money is extremely high and they are worthy of the attention of any fan of watches.
@@LesterLovesWatches Next video is about a new development of Frederique Constant ...
Nice video. 36mm Explorer in steel is my most favorite Rolex model. If I were lucky enough to have a Rolex, this would be the one.
This is a watch that will be for a long time in the collection... so I keep my gingers crossed ... go for it!
16:09. Great video and commentary, Alexander. Unfortunately in the US, we no longer have waiting lists. Patience is no longer enough. In the US, we have to compete in spending history among clients to be considered for a Rolex watch. (And no spending amount guarantees anything.) If I have to spend tens of thousands on diamonds to *maybe* be considered-not knowing who else is spending what-I like the guaranteed, overnight shipping from the grey dealers better. It is our ADs who have gotten greedy. When MSRP on today’s Breitlings is $8K, a steel Royal Oak MSRP is over $20K, and Patek MSRP for a new steel 5711 is $34K, aren’t Rolex MSRP set unrealistically low, creating the problem in the first place?
Interesting read! Thanks for sharing! It is a shame and only created - as you wrote - by greedy ADs… What a shame! Rolex is “only” meant to be a manufacturer. That’s what the Rolex foundation wants … the ADs are free to do what they want with the watches they get delivered… The only way to stop these greedy activities is to create an official waiting list handled/operated by Rolex … so everyone wanting a Rolex would exactly know when he gets his desired watch for retail price…
Great one, minimalist, chic. What we need . Great job 👏
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us...
Nice looking watches; was a guy I heard of once, who wore his Rolex to work on a daily basis, to a sawmill, now that's a tool watch!
A Rolex is almost indestructible ... 😉
Amen to retail only.
Can you please specify? I don't get the point ...
@@WatchAdvisor the point is hear, hear to avoid the gray market and flippers, and simply pay retail. Be patient and wait. 👍
@@jongoodman7563 Thanks for specifying, I couldn’t agree more!!!!!!
I owned both 36 and 39 mm. The 36 is much better IMHO
Tastes are different…. 😉
It has a thickness of 11,7 cm an a 19 mm bracelett . Big difference an causes a lot of discussion
I measured 20 and 12 with a rule and reading was exactly this … maybe these are the correct sizes… no one will ever take of the bracelet and these 0,3 mm in thickness don’t make any difference at all…
@@WatchAdvisor my jubilee bracelet from a dj36 does not fit the lug width of the exp 1. These details matter. It is a key difference for this watch vs op36 or dj36.
@@WatchAdvisor thx for the reply. I just can tell what other youtubers say. The old explorer was famous of being a strap monster. Mainly because of the 20mm. So ist guess its important to others. Habe a nice day
@@spinaquanable Such tiny differences aren’t really visible with the naked eye … the old Explorer was a 39 mm watch the new one is a 36 mm …. This is what you see!
@@BL-hj7hi I hear you! Anyhow I would never change the look of that watch. It is beautiful as it is…
I have an 18 cm wrist, my “personal” taste says it is a perfect fit..
The new 40 mm one would be the one I want...
@@WatchAdvisor yeah.. might look weird with all that negative space on the dial though.. will probably look too big on your wrist.. shoot a video when you can get your hands on it pls..
I will do!
Diameter is 35.5mm, bracelet is 19mm, tapering to 14mm.
35,5 mm? Guess why Rolex officially indicates 36 mm?
Yeah, the 19mm are the only downside of that beautiful watch in my opinion.
@@WatchAdvisor Rolex either round up or down, for marketing purposes I guess. But if you run a calliper over any Rolex you'll see that they are not whole numbers
@@TheStenius I guess it depends if you plan on putting it on a strap? Rolex bracelets are icons really. I also don't think modern Rolex sports watches look good on straps. The solid end links and precise fit/integration into the case means Rolex adopt really sharp edges, which are exposed when on a third-party strap
The two-tone isn't popular today, but it'll be America's most wanted by Spring of '22 if not sooner. I said the same thing about the OP, the 39s, and the Exp2 so here we go again, "get'em before they're hot!"
Good luck everyone!
Thanks for the great vid!
Love your comment and passion! What makes you be so sure that this will happen?
@User 2389 Well, let us see what will happen ....
After seeing a lotof watch community debates whether the current 36 is too small or perfect size I’m pretty sure rolex would best come out with a minor update of explorer36 with an actual diameter of 36.xx ,20 mm lug width and end all debates for a true perfect size rolex for all.
Thanks for sharing your passion with us!
waiting for full gold version 🤩
He he! I’m not sure if Rolex will ever present the Explorer in a full gold version
@@WatchAdvisor just like full gold submariner🤑
Beautiful watch and size but they should have kept the bracelet taper 19 to 16 IMO.
Why?
@@WatchAdvisor sorry for the late reply. I think a taper from 19 to 16 or even 20 to 16 would make a watch a little beefier even with the same 35-36mm case.
that's funny all the comments about the size, i think that's a big weakness point in many ways. ( FP Journe watches for instance are big and heavy). Nowadays even wearing a small tank in the streets of Paris is challenge. 36 is perfect for a sportwatch
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and passion with us!
Hi Alexander, how are you ?
Gorgeous vidéo.
Explorer is one of m'y Favorite whatch: true luxury is simplycity.
Quality built is top notch too.
36 mm? I like it, it's différent and have more elegance for m'y taste.
I consider that's a size for both women and men.
I apreciate that Rolex keeps thé original size, After all, small is beautiful too.
Congratulations for your work and expertise
I am fine, thanks for asking and sharing our passion! That 36 mm are of course mirroring a certain elegance and simplicity… and there is a trend for smaller watches also… for me personally too small…
A great watch! For women explorers and Asian men. It’s all about marketing to specific groups. And Rolex is king in marketing. So much so….good luck in even seeing one at an authorized dealer.
I think it is also an attractive offer for youngsters… those who will later switch to the Submariner …
@@WatchAdvisor Youngsters? youngsters dont need £5.5k + watches they need to earn such things with age and maturity, job progression etc. Cant even say University because they shouldn't really be able to afford anything near a Rolex whilst being called a university student,( debts more like it and supernoodles for dinner) and by the time Rolex comes around they should definitely be called a man! A hard Working man who has earned that privilege. And also grown fully with manly arms and wrists hahahaha
@@elgordo9999 That’s how it supposed to be, but reality is different! I am sure Rolex also targets exactly that potential customer with such a watch…
@@WatchAdvisor Reality is Rich parents i guess. Have a good day sir, all the best from Scotland. Love the content.
@@elgordo9999 Yes! Potential customers and parents willing to spend the money… The earlier a Rolex gets on the wrist of a youngster the better it is…
Double excellent quality video in same day!! First of all i've confused why Explorer I decrease from 39 mm. to 36 mm. But anyway when you looking 36mm on your wrist is perfect than i thought i agree on black dial, perfect size on everyday wear.
Thanks Alexander!
You are very welcome! And thank you for the kind feedback!
@@WatchAdvisor For current situation Rolex Explorer I 36mm. The price is +60 - 70% on gray market and can't find on the dealer for moment. that's answer is 36mm. famous than i thought.
Another execution .. love it. Many thanks
Are you happy with the "only" 36 mm?
Welcome back!
Welcome back!
I liked it up until I found out that the lug width is 19mm and not 20mm. I like to change out the bracelet for a leather or rubber tropic straps. (I feel 19mm is just too non standard)
Why is Rolex always trying to make things so difficult? I am starting to get fed up with Rolex.
Yes, in fact it is 19 mm that is our error in the video - apologies!
2:15 getting the dimensions wrong lmao...
?????
Sigh. 11.5 thk and 19mm lug width.
If it’s wrong, thanks for correcting me…
If you measure the case from 7 - 2 at the edge of the bezel. You’ll get 36mm. The bezel edge goes over slightly the case. When you measure the case (no bezel) the size is 35.5mm. Obviously try to use a digital caliper tool. Most people will assume the Explorer case at 36mm is the same case as an OP or Date Just… No, the Explorer case is somewhat sized a little different. It falls in between other 36mm Oyster cases. Rolex is very cleaver. They try to Frankenstein proof their watches.
@@Milofchg Interesting, very interesting… Thanks for sharing!
I just bought an Explorer I Mk2 today, its from 2020. 39 mm perfect size for me
Lucky you! Many now are seeking one… May your Explorer always show you happy seconds, minutes and hours…
Best reviews as usual. The Explorer 1 is just beautiful in its simplicity. But I have to agree with you, just way too small….unfortunately. Most of my watches are at 40mm, still 4mm make a huge differrnce.
Thank you for the kind feedback! For me 36 mm are also too small.. as you mentioned ... also my watches are >40 mm
The steel one could be my next Rolex....
Let me know if you have any questions…
The release of this watch has made me realize something. Obesity is a serious problem in the modern age. If a 36mm watch is too small for you, you're either trying to compensate or you seriously need to loose some weight and fix that fat wrist.
I weigh 71 / 72 kilos and I am 1,79 cm tall ... I have almost no body fat and I am top fit ... How much weight shall I loose my friend? Are you kidding? These 36 mm are too small for my 17 cm wrist! The Explorer looks like if it got lost there ...
So following your theory means that everyone with big wrists is fat?
I’ve never heard anything this ignorant. Not everyone has girly arms with no muscle like you.
@@WatchAdvisor your obviously trying to compensate 😂😜
@@EscapePlan97 🤪😇
With a girl's first name in addition 😩 I had no idea that effeminate guys were this stupid.
Personally I’m glad I collected the 39mm before it got discontinued.
As for the two-tone, I really don’t see the point of it apart to appeal to a lady. Not for me at all.
Thanks for the video.
The explorer (214270) is the perfect watch period.
That 39 mm Explorer with the long & correct hands was the one to have…
What is your wrist span not circumference
5,5 cm
Call me a moron but I love the gold explorer. Goes well with my explorer 2
Tastes are different! Buying a watch should be done with emotions and not ratio… So why not?
Stunning !
Have you had the chance to see them in real?
@@rogerdracks1880 I see.. which one do you like more?
Sorry my mistake, I thought I was replying to a different TH-camr.
I actually have the 2015 39mm version and this version ( 36mm ) 2022 version
I wear them both but after you get used to the size, the 36mm slightly better in my opinion.
My wrist is similar to yours in size
@@rogerdracks1880 For what did you apologize? Thanks for sharing, direct feedback is the best we can get…
When you say "+5 or -5 millimetres adjustment" the difference would be 1cm while in actuality it's the basic length plus 5 millimetres.
There is no typical basic length … easylink makes everything a little flexible…
@@WatchAdvisor what I mean is you have it in one position and then you can either add five or subtract five millimetres. You cannot do plus AND minus five millimetres because that would be 1cm total length difference. ;-)
Not bad. Maybe they will offer it in 41mm also?
No! They just reduced the site to 36 mm and there is the new Oyster Perpetual available in 41 mm …
@@WatchAdvisor I know they reduced it from 39mm to 36mm. But there's no law to say they couldn't decide (next year or somewhen) to offer it in two sizes - both 36mm and 41mm.
I would definitely consider either one at 39mm. I'm also not overly negative on the steel gold version...all steel for outdoors and the steel gold for exploring the office, for those who still have an office, lol. I can accept 36mm on a true classic as it would be appropriate to the time. I believe Rolex was targeting women with this re-issue, although their timing was off considering women are now wearing 39-41mm nowadays.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us! The new size targets women, Asians and youngsters IMHO…
Sure they were
It’s really nice to see Rolex salvaging one of its models without succumbing to the inevitable trend of square cases and tacky shiny finishes
Thats pure Rolex design at its best ... the size is something else... since tastes are different...
36 mm = style, elegance & class ... everything over 40 mm = Bling Bling
Some say the brand itself is tacky and generic
Why don't you like the grey market, if it's not possible to find the watch at retail store?
Some ADs, their flippers and resellers have created that artificial, greedy business …. Why should one want to support this???
I have the money in hand to buy a Rolex. Unfortunately I'm still on some "waitlist" for a Submariner (going on 2 years), and the new Explorer 36mm. I never got the call for the 39mm. I have AD purchase history but I won't kiss ass, waste money on jewelry/watches that I don't need, and waste time being fake person to AD reps just to get a watch.
You have to have purchase history with your AD unfortunately. You have to play the AD game or wait very very long time and even then you might not get the watch you want. Personally, I'm buying Tudor watches to build up purchase history and I've my name for Explorer II. Of course you can look at other brands as well. But the heart wants what it wants!
@@omarion07 I hear you, that's one way of doing it. As for myself I'm at an age where I have no time for games. The way I see it. I NEVER had to wait in line or pay for any VIP service at nightclubs LOL So I don't need to be on the other side of a horological velvet rope at an AD. You either want my business$$$ or not. At the end of the day it's just a watch. It doesn't make a man any more handsome or youthful. Fortunately a Rolex is one of the few goods that will last a lifetime, and truly retain it's value. Can't say that about any car, furniture, electronics, clothes, even most jewelry. The only reason I want to upgrade is because I don't want to wear my 5513 maxi dial Sub. It's had it's days since I first bought it used in the early 90's.
No doubt it's a legendary watch but 36mm is a tough sell for a gents wrist. Great review as always.
My words! Thanks for showing! At least for me ... too small ...
Great review. I really think Rolex should have retained the 39mm and branded / marketed this watch as a women's alternative, as it is mostly women who will end up wearing it. Congratulations on your message at the end of the video. I wish more TH-cam channels would also discourage people from buying these watches at vastly inflated prices. Unfortunately it seems there are a lot of very shady characters operating within the world of watches - some of them even have their own TH-cam channels!
Thanks for sharing our passion! Please do also watch our video of the new Explorer II we published yesterday… you will hear the same message at the end of the video. What these greedy ADs, their flippers and resellers do is a SHAME! The only way to stop this BS is to have an official waiting list provided by Rolex. Independent ADs will do what they want and not deliver the watches to those who really want and deserve them… It is greedy business and a shame!
Agreed with you … it’s way too small … it’s very much a Ladys watch (at least for my test) I would prefer the 39mm for sure
Yep! 😜
😍😍
It looks elegant and, definitely, in my opinion, it fits both gender.... So cool watch 👍
Unisex for sure! 😉
I was deciding between this and a DJ41, I have 18cm wrist I think the 36mm would look too small after watching this video. Thanks for making this.
IMHO for an 18 cm wrist it is too small... My wrist size is 17 cm, so absolutely comparable ... The watch looks a bit lost an my wrist...
2:37 isn’t it 19mm in between the lugs ?! 🤔
Great quality video as always 👏🏼👏🏼
It is 20… we checked…
Check again..
@@WatchAdvisor Are you sure? In your first review video’s comment section, you mentioned 19mm. All review videos so far have measured the lug to lug as 19mm.
I measured 20 mm … maybe I made a mistake… anyhow no one will take that bracelet off … that error of 1 mm is not worth to be discussed IMHO…
I would buy this watch if offered one lol
You should deposit your interest with several ADs … and be a little patient … But PLEASE don’t buy it for an overprice from one of the greedy resellers! There is an official list price and this is the correct price for the Explorer…
Alex, will you be reviewing japanese watches? Grand seiko .. :)
Not planed in the moment…
I agree with you. It looks a bit small on your wrist, but it is all matter of taste. I think the 36mm would look great on a women´s wrist.
👍🏼💃🏻
Hi Alex. Thanks was waiting for this video. The 36 is too small. I think it’s even smaller the. 114270 from 2009. Beautiful to look at but not for my 19cm wrist. It’s unfortunate the 39 is selling for such a premium. Maybe Rolex will add a 41 mm like everyone thought one day to line up with the OP. Oh and gold has no business being on one of the very first tool watches.
That size is a perfect offer for tiny wrists … I am not sure if we will ever see a 41 mm version… maybe a new “Turn-O-Graph” instead… Who knows?
Great video but ruined it with the 36mm should've offered with the 39mm rather than instead of!!!! The bi metal version is just ridiculous and an own goal by Rolex!!!
Thanks for sharing our passion! I hear you, but the Explorer will still sell like hell…
I prefer the 39 mm
Me too! That watch really is tinny…
They messed up moving "explorer" to the top of the dial and the font size/spacing. Just compare the new 36 and the 39 and the old, previous 36 side by side.
I wish I could show all these details in videos and discuss all these differences with you guys…
Not my cup of tea but my wife might like it 👍🏼 they should have left it at 39mm
The Rolesor is a very, very cool watch for women!
Yep...if she likes chunky wearing watches...go for it
@@StruanRobertson29 It is not you deciding what she will wear/like, it is HER!
@@WatchAdvisor exactly as I said. My wife has tried it on and as I expected its too chunky a watch for her and is too big. But if that's what a particular woman wants she should go for it. I've seen a woman wearing a submariner as well....obviously a woman who likes quite a bulky piece
@@StruanRobertson29 my life companion wears a Submariner … and other big watches … and she likes them…
My local ad says rolex make far few explorer and we get 2-4 watches per year 🤣!! I made myself believe him 😂. We all know rolex at the best make 1 million watches which is huge and should cover all of us but there’s something wrong in between Geneva and the end consumer. Because no waay i can find tons of new 2021 models in nearest grey dealers while ADs are completely empty or full of dummy watches 😂. Why rolex silent about this and no official response even their fear of camera makes me more suspicious
So true!!! There is nothing I can/may add to what you wrote… Rolex in fact manufactures +/- 1.000.000 watches per year…
My AD said exactly the same thing 1-2 watches per year for the Explorer and that they never managed to get one for everyone who had enquired about the previous 39mm model.
@@antonylaing2499 1.000.000 watches per year manufactured …. I can’t believe these stories narrated by ADs… 🤷🏻♂️
2-4 explorers a year 😂. Utter nonsense
@@n.h187 because everyone wants one🥺 itz underrated understated and flying under the radar wooolex 🥺🥺
It's great for you to say not to support the grey market. It's ridiculous what they go for.
Of course! It is not the first time I do… I also wrote it in several comments dealing with Rolex…
I’ve seen the new Explorer in both steel and two tone and it’s tiny. I think they are going for the boy’s entry level watch or a ladies weird two tone piece. The 39mm version was perfect, maybe they painted themselves into a corner with nowhere to go. Or maybe their design and creativity department are just resting on their laurels and have no idea what to do next. Overall it’s a pass from me and I’m guessing most man sized adults.
Rolex most likely got back to the original 36 mm to have an offer for smaller/younger wrists… The “Rolesor” is for sure a cool watch for women 😉
@@WatchAdvisor the Explorer has the best lume show of any Rolex. That’s the party piece. I’m tempted by a discontinued 39mm but I’d need to be 15 again for the 36mm to be a good fit.
The heavy taper is the issue. The 36mm OP wears better and masculine.
Did you have the chance to compare both? Interesting remark… thanks for sharing…
@@WatchAdvisor Not at the same time unfortunately but separately and the new Explorer bracelet felt smaller then 20mm and the taper made it feel even smaller to me. Whereas the OP bracelet felt thicker (wider). Amazing what a tweak here and there can accomplish.
I think the taper is quite stylish. I actually really like it
@@StruanRobertson29 It’s a more refined look for sure, but makes the watch wear even smaller IMO.
@@bobbycalifornia7077 each to their own. For the first 2 days I questioned how I felt about the taper...6 weeks later its not even a thing for me...I really like it
38mm would have been the best perfect size!! :|
Maybe 🤔 they should have kept 39mm
I sold my 39 because it always felt too small, no way I could manage this 36. 43 lug to lug is tiny (my sweet spot is about 50). Hopefully Rolex release a 41, so we could have the 36 for purists, small wrist guys and women, and a 41 for medium wrist and up guys.
I don’t expect Rolex to come with a 41 mm The new 41 OP covers that segment…