Why not present candidates with detailed, live case(s) to work on? By live case, I mean you challenge candidates to outline solutions to one of your most pressing current problems (not some synthetic situation). Give them some openly available data, perhaps salted with some less sensitive internal tidbits if possible; then ask for a 5 slide presentation at the end of the day. Charlatans will crumble; promising contenders will be more clear plus you'll get some fresh insights on your problem.
What about maleficent references stabbing you in the back?
10 years later, still unsolved.
Peter Theil gets things backwards quite often. Networks do dominate but it selects for narcissists not good people.
Why not present candidates with detailed, live case(s) to work on? By live case, I mean you challenge candidates to outline solutions to one of your most pressing current problems (not some synthetic situation). Give them some openly available data, perhaps salted with some less sensitive internal tidbits if possible; then ask for a 5 slide presentation at the end of the day. Charlatans will crumble; promising contenders will be more clear plus you'll get some fresh insights on your problem.
lots of vague & grey area & not knowing the intricacies. That would become a consultancy firm interview lol
I get bad vibes from Reid.