100 Icons of Korean Culture Ep41 Bow
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
- Subscribe to arirang!
www.youtube.com...
More Episodes! • 100 Icons of Korean Cu...
Bow
Koreans have been known throughout history as a people skilled with the bow. The bow was the most important and excellent weapon of war for Korea, and considered a tool for training the mind and character of seonbi scholars. The bow was not only handled with great skill, but also created in Korea with the world's most advanced techniques.
The bow, the protector of the Korean peninsula.
In this episode, we examine how bows large and small gave Korea a military advantage and protected the nation through the ages.
활
예로부터 '동이족'이라 불리며 활을 잘 다루던 민족으로 알려졌던 한국인.
우리나라에서 활은 가장 중요하고 뛰어난 전쟁 무기였고, 선비들의 심신단련과 인격도야를 위한 필수과목이었다. 최고의 전투무기로 사용했던 우리나라 활은 당시 궁수의 기술뿐만 아니라 활의 제조술도 세계에서 가장 훌륭했다.
한반도를 지켜온 힘, 활.
작은 크기의 활로 최고의 전투력을 가졌던 한국이 우수할 수밖에 없었던 이유와 한반도를 지켜온 힘이 어디서부터 비롯되었는지 알아보자.
Great video. the Korean bow is in a unique category in relation to other Asian bows, even though many nations/people-groups have developed insane good bows. I have shot with recurve bow for years and have just obtained my first Korean laminated bow and it is absolutely fantastic to shoot. When a used to a draw of 27"- 30", then it's like a new world when one shoot with these bows that one can draw back 31-34"(maybe longer, too..) "The kick" a get of shooting such bows are incredibly great, so, for me it has been difficult to go back to recurve bows after I have got the technique to sit with this type of bow.. my humble opinion is that Korea makes the world's best bows.
How about a shout out to the infamous and immortal Yi Sun Sin and the mighty Turtle ships that also saved us from countless invasions. R.I.P our great hero. Gone but never forgotten.
2:22 what terrible form
Oh thank God, I was hoping you'd show up
agreed what a short draw and if he was trying Mediterranean draw, it was on wrong side
thank yew. very good
How can buy korean bow and arrow ??
Sorry but you guys have to do better research. Korea didn't start at Joseon. And neither did our archery culture. I know for a fact that there archeological proof that Koreans habe been archers since Goguryeo, and I'd even go as far as to say maybe earlier. We have a VERY intimate relationship with archery, and it didn't start in Joseon.
Korea did start at Joseon; means Gojoseon; means Old Joseon, which is Oldest contury of Korean peninsula.
also Goguryeo is called as Goryeo at that time. either of name's are used but Goryeo is more often but fixed as Goguryeo at later Goryeo period for prevent confusion.
Joseon - Pre three kingdoms(Booyeo, Okjeo, Dongyea, Mahan, Byeonhan, Jinhan, etc...) - Three kingdoms(Goryeo, Baeckjae, Silla, Gaya, Booyeo, etc...) - Two kingdoms(Silla, Balhae) - Later Three kingdoms(Hoo Goguryeo; later Goryeo, Hoo Baeckjae, Silla) - Goryeo - Joseon - Daehan jaegook(Empire) - Japanese occupation - Daehan mingook(Republic)
archery cultuer of (Later) Joseon of this Video is simply that is what remaining today in Korea.
@@elvenisar the Joseon the program was referring to is 15th century Joseon. It says it in the first century if the program. Furthermore Korea didn't start at Gojoseon, that was the first documented nation in Korean history, but it isn't the start or origin of Korean people. Our people are linguisticly and culturally linked to the Siberian people who live around Lake Baikal. We've been in Korea since the Paleolithic age 40,000bce-30,000bce. The Jeulmun period 8000bce is the first culture in the peninsula, and that was even before Gojoseon. Then there was Mumun period 1500 to 300bce. During this time trade and influences from China began, and so did rice agriculture and the birth if many indigenous traditions. Gojoseon was the first nation built upon Chinese influences, such as writing, government etc. Gojoseon was also when we adopted writing to record our history as far as we know. But there was a whole few thousand years of people in the Korean peninsula and Manchuria who where linguisticly and ethnically distinct from other people.
The Korean ruling class came from Central Asia and Siberia.
@@bleee1 which one?
@@omggiiirl2077 ancient koreans are nomadic.
임진왜란때 활이 조총보다 더 위력적이었을것 같은데. 발사빈도, 유효사거리, 곡사 등.
ㅋㅋㅋ
왜? 미군 주력 소총 M4카빈 보다 좋다고 하지...
연속 발사 속도 외엔 정확도, 파괴력에서 게임 자체가 안되는거 모르나?
제발 그넘에 국뽕 자제좀 하자.
@@chrisking. 조총사거리랑 연사속도 각궁에 개후달리는건팩튼데
@@chrisking. 굳이 따지면 궁수보다 일반 조총병 양산하는게 훨신 쉬워서 그럼 지금으로 치면 궁수는 특수부대원이고 조총병은 일반 사병정도 난이도 수준임
@@atlantabraves9000
아뇨 그 반대임.ㅋㅋㅋㅋ잘 훈련된 궁사들 조차도 조총에 죽었던게 팩트임.
난중잡록에 의하면
"우리의 화살을 쏘는곳에는 투구와 갑옷으로 피할수 있지만, 조총은 군사와 말이 당해낼수 없습니다". 라고 기록하고 있음.
즉 조선의 화살은 갑옷과 투구에 막히는대 일본의 조총은 갑옷으로는 막을수가 없다는 내용의 기록임.ㅋㅋㅋ
그때 당시 각궁은 갑옷을 뚫으려면 편전을 필수로 사용해야 했으나 편전은 명중률이 낮아서 조총에 비할 위력이 안나왔다고 함. 그마저도 편전을 정확하게 쏠정도로 훈련된 병사도 많지 않았음ㅇㅇ
@@Boss_96
맞는 말은 아님. 그건 임란이전 조총에 대한 조선의 평가임. 하지만 임란 이후 조선이 조총으로 무장했던 것만봐도 그 말이 틀린말이라는 걸 짐작 할수 있음.
까놓고 말해 그당시 화살이 총알보다 멀리 날아가던 시대냐? 하면 그것부터가 틀린 말임.
그때당시 조선은 총의 유효사거리와 화살의 최대사거리를 비교하는 오류를 범했음. 그때당시 조총이라 할지라도 최대사거리는 약 300미터 이상에 80~100미터 거리에서도 갑옷을 능히 뚫는 위력이었음. 다만 50미터를 넘어가면 명중률이 매우 낮아져, 사람이 쏴서 맞추기 어려웠기 때문에 유효사거리가 50미터라고 봤던 것임.
임진왜란 이전부터 조선은 조총의 존재는 알고 있었으나 자세히는 알지 못했음. 위 언급한 내용처럼 조총은 사거리가 50미터 가량이라고 알고 있었으므로, 왜인들이 사용하는 조총이 활에 위협이 될리가 없다고 판단했었음ㅇㅇ
그러나 그건 크나큰 오류였음. 뭣보다 조선은 조총의 위력을 전혀 몰랐음.
위 설명처럼 궁시로는 뚫을수 없는 거리에서도 조총은 갑옷을 아주 쉽게 뚫어재꼈으므로, 조선은 이에 조총의 위력에 놀라는 기록을 많이 남겼음ㅇㅇ
특히 각궁은 갑옷을 뚫으려면 편전을 사용해야했는대, 편전은 사거리에비해 명중률이 엄청 낮았음. 갑옷을 뚫을수 있느냐? 라는 명제가 달린다면 조총이 훨씬 명중률이 높고 사거리도 길며 위력적이었다는 것임.
순조때 서영보라는 사람 순조에게 이렇게 말했다고함. 활로 갑옷을 뚫으려면 편전을 사용해야 하며, 그것은 가장 숙련되고 정교한 기술인 것은 맞으나, 조총에비하면 아무것도 아니라고 하였음.
그러자 순조는 총이라는 것이 언제 어디서 만들어진 물건이지는 알수 없으나, 쏘게 되면 반드시 살과 뼈를 꿰뚫어 사람을 죽게 만드니 총이 등장하고서 명장이 없었다는 말은 과연 신뢰할만하다. 라고 감탄하였다고 함.
즉 조선은 처음에 조총을 얕보았을 지언정 직접 위력을 경험해보고는 감탄해 마지않아 조총을 주력으로 사용하게 되었음.
이렇듯 조선은 조총을 본격적으로 사용한 뒤부터 조총의 성능에 감탄하는 기록을 많이 남겼으며, 특히 활과 비교하는 기록을 많이 남겼는대 하나같이 활보다 조총을 인정해줬음.
Are you kiding!?
First shoot🙈
Great video, but if I had a dime for every culture that claimed its bow was the best in history...
Truth is, every different design of bow has a specific purpose. The Korean one, it seems, was designed to outrange other bows (or perhaps the archery doctrine of nearby cultures), and did well at that.
Plus, Japanese bows can shoot WAY farther than 25m 🙂
what is a "canadian bow"?
Good thing the “Canadian” bow only shoots 60m as I live 70m from the Canada border 😳
@@nepheshr290 hehe, well said... ;)
When you shoot it, instead of a twang is says "sorry"
😲
wtf is this guy smoking... Japanese bows had a range of 25 meters, and korean bows had a range of 300 to 400?
Press X to doubt
If you send me a bow I’ll do a fair review of your bow. I would consider it an honor to do so. thank You.
In battle age, Japanese bow flew over 400m. But now, the bow for kyu-do is not like in battle age. The reasons why it has been using the target only 30m distance far.
i cringed so hard at 2:20... that dude has no idea how to draw a korean bow and hes korean lol
이런 다큐만들면서 재연배우들 활잡는 꼬라지 봐라..
아휴.....저딴 식으로 잡아서는 날아가지도 않고 정확하지 않음..
좀 꼼꼼하게 제대로 좀 만들지..
정확히는 귀뒤까지 당겨야하죠.
그래서 재연배우 밖에 못하는 것 ㅎㅎ
의지가 있으면 활 쏘는 영상도 찾아보고 알아보고 했을텐데 그냥 그 수준 ㅎ
Korean bow is not the best, every bow is.
European Bow/English longbow is best at cost-production.
Japanese Bow/Yumi i think are best at aesthetic and Zen.
Korean Bow/Gakgung. are great in mobility.
I've heard of english longbow having over 200 lbs draw weight but haven't heard any composite bow with such draw weight.
Each bow is unique in their own ways. Different methods, of both making and using. I adore and respect them all and despised comparing them.
I think the phrase you are looking for is "There's no such thing as the perfect sauce, just perfect sauces " said by Howard Moskowitz.
This documentary is TERRIBLE. The man says Japanese bows only shoot 25 m? I think hes referring to Kyodo lmao where they shoot that distance. What a dingus. U MAY be able to shoot down men at 300 m but that's a stretch. Waste of arrows to shoot long range when you can be more accurate and deadly at half the range
There were Korean warriors who's archery skills were excellent. There is a looooong history of Archery in Korea. It is obvious that ordinary archers won't be able to hit someone from 200 to 400 meters away, but few were able to back in the day. There were recorded details of those feats. You have to remember that these experts practiced ALOT since when they were really young.
Also, back in the day, when the armies meet, you don't aim for individual soldier. You aim in the general direction of the masses. So, you saying shooting down a man at 300 m is a stretch is PRETTY SILLY. These Bows had a max range of about 500 meters. 300 meter is not a stretch to shoot a group of people running towards you with MANY arrows. That is how Koreans defended their defensive position back in the day.
@@1flash3571 the impact of the arrow at 300m is not good enough to kill a man in armour. The english also practiced at 200 yards + but in war that was cut down to less then 50 m BECAUSE of armour. Also in situations where its point blank u would CLEARLY aim for a individual meanwhile at range u would "aim at the mass"
@@Daylon91 You think you know how it was in those days where most are poor, and most didn't have armour. WTH are you talking about??????? Do you think most basic soldier have metal armour? Most have thin leather armour which wasn't much of a protection against arrows even at a long range. ALSO, there were lots of exposed areas on the body and limbs. If a mass of arrows come at you and your group of soldiers, SOME OF YOU will get hit and the arrows will sometimes hit those exposed areas. DON'T you think so???????
I did an experiment on a Korean TV program, and the Korean bow pierced through the plate armor, but not the scale armor. I heard it was because the scales moved and reduced the kinetic energy of the arrow.
Yumi is the best and it's arrow is heavier hence more damage and lethal pierce.