Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS/ANDROID/PC: pl.go-ga.me/gw2qjig1 and get a special starter pack with an Epic champion ⚡️Tallia⚡️ Available only for new players! 🎁 Use the promo code JTSKIN to get the Epic champion Stag Knight and a Skin for Stag Knight designed by JonTron! Don't miss your chance, the promo code is valid until October 7th, only for new players. 📱 If you are an iOS user, enter the promo code here: plarium.com/en/redeem/raid-shadow-legends/
I rather play War Thunder every single day without stopping rather play that Sh###y "mobile game" that I always hate and will never play their crappy game even if they pay me a crap ton of money.
or under the hull in the middle, there really isn’t armor there (edit) this can happen even with a 50lbs to a sherman if the sherman were to drive on top of the bomb 2nd edit i meant 250lbs sorry
@@asillylildude actually no i saw another video where they gave the bombs longer timers and the tank drove right on top of the bomb and only 1000kg+ bombs would kill it, it is legitimately coded to be immune to those bombs even though it would probably die
4:50 I genuinely doubt this kind of damage would be sufficient to disable the main gun. I could definitely see reduced accuracy, but a majority of the barrel is still intact.
POV: you try bombing the pure Stalinium machine Btw this thing would not survive the shockwave of a cold war nuclear bomb. Little Boy from WW2 was 15kt. Hull may but it'd be tossed like a tin can and the crew wouldn't survive that (even warships can't)
For the ppl saying we needed to throw more accurate and on top of the vehicle: we really tried and its mostly impossible with unguided munitions or no guidance computer. And to be fair: when are you gonna throw a bomb precisely on the roof of a tank 😂
all the time. In fact a lot of times to accurate, and hit the barrel of a tank. 0.0 fuse is the only way to go. Anyone suggesting otherwise, has never played cas on a high level of skill.
It is really easy. Stuff from the bombers with a bomb sight should make it significantly easier. It’s not hard to drop a bomb directly next to a stationary tank lmao
@@osmanturk769 actual weight means nothing, its the actual explosive mass that matters. FAB-5000 uses 3361kg of TGA-16 (5041kg TNT) while the 12000lb HC Blockbuster uses 3973kg of Torpex (6357kg TNT). Thats a 1300kg of difference when it comes to TNT equivalent.
This tank in real life is like the ground equal to the Mig25. Everyone thought it was this crazy fast maneuverable air dominance machine. It was fast....for about 30 seconds. And that was it. Claims of this tank surviving a nuclear blast, it being CBRN protected, and many others. But remember...this is the USSR we are talking about.
I was doing the Sturmtiger + drone strat with a friend, and at the time was new to the BR so didn't recognize the Object 279. It was the cleanest direct hit with thr sturmtiger we had managed to score yet, but all it did was blow off the tracks lmao.
@@daltondraws3087 So... alot of strategies for the cold war in europe was the usage of ALOT of tactical nukes. So, everyone was expecting to be fighting in that environment to some degree. The US even trained for this by operating infantry and vehicles whilst conducting nuclear bomb tests.... That is as stupid as you think it is. The 279 was designed to fight in these environments by having a more sterile/sealed design allowing them to be buttoned up to avoid the worst of the radiation. I'm not sure if this next bit is true but I've heard that it was designed to be able to be operational after a nuclear strike. Not a direct hit ofc and the crew likely wouldnt have survived but the tank could have been made operational fairly easily.
@@Pointclearius it just doesn’t make sense that they would be fighting in an unsafe environment probably spending and sacrificing more equipment just to be able to stand in it
Yeah it's quite literally immune to all HE. No matter the size of the bomb, and no matter where you hit it, it does nothing. Me and my friend did extensive testing and I dropped a 2000 lb LGB directly onto the top of the turret, top of the hull, under the hull... nothing. Mavericks work because they're HEAT
What's funny is that, while the hull design is made so that the tank isn't flipped like a flapjack if it was in the blast zone of a nuclear bomb, it was only so the tank can be recovered and used even in the wake of a blast. Having this thing survive the blast _and continue fighting_ was never a concern by the engineers or military bureaus that designed it. So yes, the tank itself could survive a close miss, but the crew would have their insides turned to soup by the shockwave, or in the case of a nuclear bomb, be cooked alive by the radiation.
Crew should actually be fine as the thickness of the armor will stop any radiation and the design allows the shockwave to roll over the tank rather then slam into it.
@@DeathlordSlavik It takes upwards of 10 inches of steel to stop Gamma radiation, and while there are sections of the tank that are that thick, most of it isn't and is vulnerable to practically any source of radiation, whether it be the initial blast or the radioactive dust of the residual fallout. Also, while the hull design can mitigate shockwaves, it can only do so much, essentially making the kill radius slightly smaller.
@@no-legjohnny3691 You need to do better research as only 3 inches is enough to reduce it by a factor of 10 as you don't need to stop it entirely just reduce it. Also you are forgetting that gamma radiation doesn't travel very far through the atmosphere and when combined with the inverse square law of distance to dosage you will be safe from the radiation in such a tank. The radioactive dust doesn't emit enough to be a problem for a armored vehicle due to not emitting enough to penetrate solid material effectively as the danger from radioactive dust is direct unprotected exposure not exposure through what is effectively a steel wall. The design does more then make the kill radius slightly smaller it makes it significantly smaller due to how shockwaves actually work and how they transfer from one material to another.
@@DeathlordSlavikMy dude, it does not matter. The pressure wave from a big enough bomb would shred the crew as it launches the tank, you’re just not surviving. You would get splattered against the insides of the vehicle.
I think if tank flips in real life because of bomb it’s 95% that all crew are dead, and 5% that someone is screaming with every bone broken inside a tank
I hate to be this guy but bombs are near enough useless against it the hull was designed to move the shockwaves around the tank smoothly so most bombs don’t effect it to much
Well it wasn't designed to take a direct hit from a nuke or any high explosive it was designed to withstand the shock wave and extreme force of a nuke , anything within the ground zero of a nuclear bomb would most definitely be atomized seeing as most nukes can leave a very very large crater in the earth
I can only imagine the sound inside the compartment. They probably went deaf after all these bombing runs or should’ve died from shock after all that noise
@@adude8816 use a bit of your imagination. The tank survived a Lancaster bomb and was being bombarded by various bomb loads one after the other. That sound protection will only cover so much
@@EnglishGamer2019 imagination? After that they would be dead lmao. They ain't gonna be hearing nothing. Noise won't kill them first I can tell you that much.
@@EnglishGamer2019 and again. Shock would not kill them first. If they are eligible to operate such a vehicle, it should be obvious that shock would not be what kills them. They are trained to operate a vehicle that Is built to survive a nuclear blast. Im sure that they wouldn't choose just ANY tank crewman to operate such a vehicle.
Hmmm thumbnail seems VERY similar to TheAllMightyEgo’s using every bomb size in war thunder video? No credit or anything? Damn been a long time viewer and never thought you would take a thumbnail without giving some sort of credit
Funny of what the Russians thought when making this tank. I get nothing in the world can save you if a nuke fell on top of you but for the earlier bombs the shrapnel wouldn't be what kills you but the kinetic energy of the tank itself would turn the people inside into paste. The tank itself would be the weapon for the crew like if you shook something REALLY HARD and there was someone inside in a metal box yeah they'd be dead lol.
@@hypophiseadenome i was just excited to find a video that shows the Obj 279's limit bc i have been searching for the past 2 days... So i left a comment THEN watched it...
It's not made to survive the explosion just the blast, "if it hit the roof or the hull it would destroyed it" as far as I know there's no tank that can survive a direct hit from a 100/200kg bomb
I've seen it survived 1k bombs that landed on the engine deck. Bombs landing on the roof is a very possible kill though. Bullpup rockets can kill it that way so no doubt bombs would too.
Okay, here’s why the bombs never hurt the crew The object 279 was designed to be blast proof to nuclear weapons to an extent, meaning, everything should be alright when hit, so war thunder coded the crew impossible to kill with bombs
No, it's not. It was meant to be deployed in a post-nuclear apocalyptic environment. If anything, the engineers hoped that it could survive the shockwave of a nuclear blast at the very edge of it, due to the extra tracks, but this was never tested. It did however have anti-radiation lining and such. So, in conclusion, the armor was arranged this way to give it the best possible protection ever, the nuclear part of it was just propaganda. If anything it would've been shockwave-proof, not blast proof.
I don’t understand this. It was designed by o survive the shockwave and and not flip over in a blast. Not survive the actual explosion the heat would still vaporize the tank
oop I thought it was gunna be for real, not a game, thats actually pretty unrealistic considering the dev's dont know....and tend not to research.. anyway.. oh wow... watch that I'll say its very unrealistic...is energy not calculated? example a normal 500 Pound bomb of a dauntless diving at 350 miles an hour hits with almost 5 tons of force.. ps some even went THROUGH entire AIRCRAFT CARRIERS DECKS 10 feet of steel? gee ya dont think huh..even if the bomb had no explosives it would definitely leave one mighty dent.. ( crushed most tanks in fact nevermind the explosives detonating after the fact (insult to injury LOL)
I wanna take this further into a a little fun made up scenario. Its 1950 something kind of area it we're in (insert map) So the Americans, british, French and germans are on one team and the soviets are on the other. The soviets have brought our their new super tank. The object 279 (she has got some other random tanks as well) to stop the advance of these countries. They cause trouble walking through the ranks of the ground forces and even the helicopters cant kill it. So they call the fleet. The carrier (lets say forrestal) launch aircraft (ranks 3 to 5) to assist. Can they stop these monsters before they take too many losses? Could be fun.
All the times he flipped reminds me of the time when I was chilling in my M4 and then a bomb blew up next to me killing a teammate and flipping over next to a building. I asked teammates near me to help me in chat but they ignored me. Then an enemy tank came right behind me a killed me. :/
Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS/ANDROID/PC: pl.go-ga.me/gw2qjig1 and get a special starter pack with an Epic champion ⚡️Tallia⚡️ Available only for new players! 🎁 Use the promo code JTSKIN to get the Epic champion Stag Knight and a Skin for Stag Knight designed by JonTron! Don't miss your chance, the promo code is valid until October 7th, only for new players. 📱 If you are an iOS user, enter the promo code here: plarium.com/en/redeem/raid-shadow-legends/
Raid shadow legends cant help the war thunder grind
Was there really no other sponsor other than the shitty mobile game?
Pretty sure that Maus would survive more.
I rather play War Thunder every single day without stopping rather play that Sh###y "mobile game" that I always hate and will never play their crappy game even if they pay me a crap ton of money.
@@Monarch_MercenaryPMC I hate Warthunder.
I love how Obj. 279 survives almost everything but i got killed by Friendly Arty Strike with it 2days ago
Lmao...you must have gotten really mad I guess. Seen ostwinds kill this things frontally
I've died from a single m247 40 mm he shell overpessuring the front beak of my 279 and same thing with a he shell from zsu 57 2
The Gepard can kill it too frontally
I've died by arty before with the 279. Landed right above the turret and tank was a goner
My first death in my 279 was by artillery, literally my first match.
A lot of these WOULD kill if you are lucky enough to get an absolute direct hit onto the roof.
or under the hull in the middle, there really isn’t armor there (edit) this can happen even with a 50lbs to a sherman if the sherman were to drive on top of the bomb 2nd edit i meant 250lbs sorry
@@asillylildude actually no i saw another video where they gave the bombs longer timers and the tank drove right on top of the bomb and only 1000kg+ bombs would kill it, it is legitimately coded to be immune to those bombs even though it would probably die
this man, fish react him
@@bagelmaster2498 huh i saw a spookston vid where this happened with a sherman and 250 pounder so i’m not sure?
@@bagelmaster2498 and i meant 250lbs
I think if you remove all your ammo and you would survive longer like when the f-16 did the 500s you survived but then the ammo cooked off
Good point
@@ThunderWithMuffinnot really. I don’t think you would drive around in battle without ammo so it just kinda makes it more accurate
@@glowyy606 yes but this should be a pure test of hull endurance.
Those Viggen bombs are no joke lol I'll use them solely in CAS
your a monster
@@felixgutierrez993 :)
every bomb can kill you if pilot wouldn`t drunk...
The crew is gonna die of motion sickness before they die of a actual explosion
Lmfao! You should've done the Lancaster just for the lols.
I'm pretty sure nothing can survive a glorious 5 ton bomb dropped from a beautiful pe8
War thunder❌
War muffin✅
4:50 I genuinely doubt this kind of damage would be sufficient to disable the main gun. I could definitely see reduced accuracy, but a majority of the barrel is still intact.
That thing is *microphone muted* * microphone activated* ASS proved
Pretty sure the crew inside won’t fight back if they got concussions from the tank rolling on the side after a bomb explosion
Fun fact, did you know that an IS-2 can survive almost all bombs in WT?
We need a video on that!
fun fact, I died to 1000lb bombs 2 times in my IS-2 1944 in one match
The Soviets over-exaggerated things, sooo... now try a real Nuke.
POV: you try bombing the pure Stalinium machine
Btw this thing would not survive the shockwave of a cold war nuclear bomb. Little Boy from WW2 was 15kt. Hull may but it'd be tossed like a tin can and the crew wouldn't survive that (even warships can't)
For the ppl saying we needed to throw more accurate and on top of the vehicle: we really tried and its mostly impossible with unguided munitions or no guidance computer. And to be fair: when are you gonna throw a bomb precisely on the roof of a tank 😂
all the time. In fact a lot of times to accurate, and hit the barrel of a tank. 0.0 fuse is the only way to go. Anyone suggesting otherwise, has never played cas on a high level of skill.
It is really easy. Stuff from the bombers with a bomb sight should make it significantly easier. It’s not hard to drop a bomb directly next to a stationary tank lmao
i was looking forward to seeing the Fritz-X
Why does no one ever use the actual biggest bomb in the game in these kinds of videos? The Lancasters 12,000 pounder.
I think 5000KGs equals to 12000LBs so they are practically the same?
@@osmanturk769 actual weight means nothing, its the actual explosive mass that matters.
FAB-5000 uses 3361kg of TGA-16 (5041kg TNT) while the 12000lb HC Blockbuster uses 3973kg of Torpex (6357kg TNT).
Thats a 1300kg of difference when it comes to TNT equivalent.
@@osmanturk769 5,000 Kg is ~ 11,000lbs
Watch the vid until the end
If a PE-8 with 5k can kill it, a Lancaster can kill it... Think au little man.
Do you think (if not already) let viewers participate in these types if videos if they want to?
One document leak and its all over idek if you can find one about this tank because it really old
How in the hell did you get a war thunder video and you got sponsored by raid
How did not a single of the pilots land a direct hit?
This tank in real life is like the ground equal to the Mig25. Everyone thought it was this crazy fast maneuverable air dominance machine. It was fast....for about 30 seconds. And that was it. Claims of this tank surviving a nuclear blast, it being CBRN protected, and many others. But remember...this is the USSR we are talking about.
Stalinium in War Thunder is real?
perfect tank for spoktoon
i feel like the bomber missed some of its bombs
I think they just disabled bomb damage to internal modules on this tank
finnaly someone tdose this
great video but man your buddy’s aim was quite off on alot of these
2:20 minutes of sponsoring great
why havn't you tried the soviet 3000kg bomb?
That video was fun lol
Try to aim the boms right on the tank, it makes a big diff. I can kill close to any tank with 50kg if hit right
Wouldn't matter with this one. Maybe if it landed on the top of the turret. I've had 1k bombs land on the engine deck and tank still lives.
I've killed this with 100kgs once
You should do this but on a Maus
8:25 Isn't 1kg = 2.2lbs?
What are the odds that 2 of us make WT content and have such similar usernames. I have given up you are clearly the superior
Nice to meet you thundermuffin
5:29 it sure is ass proof
You didn’t use the 11,000 pound bomb
7:53 500lbs is 226kg, not 117kg
Сюз нерушимый республик свободных
Where is PE-8?
Level 3 GYATT
Thanks for doing this and showing how screwed up the engine for the game is.
try were the bombs accualy hit you
It dont work if you put the nuke on it
Wowzers
I know it’s gonna fail, this tank is built to survive the shockwave of an explosion, not the shrapnel or initial blast
Now put ERA on it
Pe8 get the job done
Obj 279: Designed to be able withstand shockwave from a nuke without flipping over
Obj 279 ingame: Absolute bomb-proof but still flipped by a bomb
Physics
It would be awesome if the bomb timers were longer and drive over it for much more direct damage ig
Ehhhh, it will survive a FAB-1000 directly under it, but not an SC1000
@@theallmightyego6756 oh, funny seeing another youtuber here.
(Just saying, the T-26 is the best reserve tank, rank it higher please)
or te bomber needs better aim
You can set them up to 10 seconds
I don't think anyone would drive over a bomb irl
I was doing the Sturmtiger + drone strat with a friend, and at the time was new to the BR so didn't recognize the Object 279.
It was the cleanest direct hit with thr sturmtiger we had managed to score yet, but all it did was blow off the tracks lmao.
Tf
@@alpacaofthemountain8760 ?
Russian bias
@@zohaibtariq7351yep😂 bc at some point it dont matter how much armor you have you aint living a fucking battle ship sized bomb
I think the test would be better if you actually had bombs that hit their target instead of missing
To be fair though they usually never land on the tank in game anyway
And to be fair the tank was meant to withstand the aftermath of a nuclear blast and not the blast itself
I dont think that makes sense at all tbh
its armor is meant to stop blasts coming from the side, its as weak as any other tank from the top so why would need to test that?
It's hard to aim a bomb
Gaijin: theres no such thing as russian bias
Also gaijin:
This thing was supposed to withstand a nuclear blast, makes sense it's like this ingame
@@hashteraksgage3281no it wasn’t.
It was meant to be deployed in a nuclear environment
@@zenitu6914bro who tf gonna be fighting in a nuclear environment
@@daltondraws3087 So... alot of strategies for the cold war in europe was the usage of ALOT of tactical nukes. So, everyone was expecting to be fighting in that environment to some degree. The US even trained for this by operating infantry and vehicles whilst conducting nuclear bomb tests.... That is as stupid as you think it is.
The 279 was designed to fight in these environments by having a more sterile/sealed design allowing them to be buttoned up to avoid the worst of the radiation. I'm not sure if this next bit is true but I've heard that it was designed to be able to be operational after a nuclear strike. Not a direct hit ofc and the crew likely wouldnt have survived but the tank could have been made operational fairly easily.
@@Pointclearius it just doesn’t make sense that they would be fighting in an unsafe environment probably spending and sacrificing more equipment just to be able to stand in it
Now thats a nokia tank
True
literally
Yeah it's quite literally immune to all HE. No matter the size of the bomb, and no matter where you hit it, it does nothing. Me and my friend did extensive testing and I dropped a 2000 lb LGB directly onto the top of the turret, top of the hull, under the hull... nothing. Mavericks work because they're HEAT
that kind of bullshit isthe thing that keep this thing price in market through the roof
How think is this thing's roof armor??
16 120kg bombs killed it at 7:42
7:58 also here with the f16.
8:30 another death lmaoo
once i got bombed like 6 times (all 1000lb bombs) by a very upset enemy team, this thing just refuses to die to bombs its so funny
When you want to troll CAS, this is the tank you break out
only costs a grand
What's funny is that, while the hull design is made so that the tank isn't flipped like a flapjack if it was in the blast zone of a nuclear bomb, it was only so the tank can be recovered and used even in the wake of a blast. Having this thing survive the blast _and continue fighting_ was never a concern by the engineers or military bureaus that designed it.
So yes, the tank itself could survive a close miss, but the crew would have their insides turned to soup by the shockwave, or in the case of a nuclear bomb, be cooked alive by the radiation.
Crew should actually be fine as the thickness of the armor will stop any radiation and the design allows the shockwave to roll over the tank rather then slam into it.
@@DeathlordSlavik It takes upwards of 10 inches of steel to stop Gamma radiation, and while there are sections of the tank that are that thick, most of it isn't and is vulnerable to practically any source of radiation, whether it be the initial blast or the radioactive dust of the residual fallout. Also, while the hull design can mitigate shockwaves, it can only do so much, essentially making the kill radius slightly smaller.
@@no-legjohnny3691 You need to do better research as only 3 inches is enough to reduce it by a factor of 10 as you don't need to stop it entirely just reduce it. Also you are forgetting that gamma radiation doesn't travel very far through the atmosphere and when combined with the inverse square law of distance to dosage you will be safe from the radiation in such a tank. The radioactive dust doesn't emit enough to be a problem for a armored vehicle due to not emitting enough to penetrate solid material effectively as the danger from radioactive dust is direct unprotected exposure not exposure through what is effectively a steel wall.
The design does more then make the kill radius slightly smaller it makes it significantly smaller due to how shockwaves actually work and how they transfer from one material to another.
You tested it so you know i see
@@DeathlordSlavikMy dude, it does not matter. The pressure wave from a big enough bomb would shred the crew as it launches the tank, you’re just not surviving.
You would get splattered against the insides of the vehicle.
Weakest Soviet tank vs Strongest explosives
What destroys is just a single 2 pound bomb 😂😂😂😂😂
Woooooo, the goat posted, thanks for another great video bro, keep it up, love to see em :)
girls: I don't know why men live less than women. / boys: (the video)
I think if tank flips in real life because of bomb it’s 95% that all crew are dead, and 5% that someone is screaming with every bone broken inside a tank
This was great! Thanks for doing this type of stuff when some of us cant.
I like how he took a lot of damage with the 25kg missiles but almost nothing with the 100kg ones
I hate to be this guy but bombs are near enough useless against it the hull was designed to move the shockwaves around the tank smoothly so most bombs don’t effect it to much
Well it wasn't designed to take a direct hit from a nuke or any high explosive it was designed to withstand the shock wave and extreme force of a nuke , anything within the ground zero of a nuclear bomb would most definitely be atomized seeing as most nukes can leave a very very large crater in the earth
Slight correction: I’m pretty sure CCIP is continuously calculated impact point, not computer calculated.
I can only imagine the sound inside the compartment. They probably went deaf after all these bombing runs or should’ve died from shock after all that noise
Tank crews wear ear protection for a reason...
@@adude8816 use a bit of your imagination. The tank survived a Lancaster bomb and was being bombarded by various bomb loads one after the other. That sound protection will only cover so much
@@EnglishGamer2019 imagination? After that they would be dead lmao. They ain't gonna be hearing nothing. Noise won't kill them first I can tell you that much.
@@adude8816 I think you missed the word, shock
@@EnglishGamer2019 and again. Shock would not kill them first. If they are eligible to operate such a vehicle, it should be obvious that shock would not be what kills them. They are trained to operate a vehicle that Is built to survive a nuclear blast. Im sure that they wouldn't choose just ANY tank crewman to operate such a vehicle.
Bruh me and my friend took it to custom and he ate my 14 Inch Arizona gun and my 12 Inch Alaska gun. Both HE and APCBC.
8:43 that's a lie. S5K's are HEAT rockets
I mean it says the tank survives not the crew or the tracks but the tank😂
This was a breath of fresh air muffin 😁 keep it.up my man!
Hmmm thumbnail seems VERY similar to TheAllMightyEgo’s using every bomb size in war thunder video? No credit or anything? Damn been a long time viewer and never thought you would take a thumbnail without giving some sort of credit
Lmao I’m friends with muffin, we already went over this, it’s fine
@@theallmightyego6756 damn my bad lmao
Funny of what the Russians thought when making this tank. I get nothing in the world can save you if a nuke fell on top of you but for the earlier bombs the shrapnel wouldn't be what kills you but the kinetic energy of the tank itself would turn the people inside into paste. The tank itself would be the weapon for the crew like if you shook something REALLY HARD and there was someone inside in a metal box yeah they'd be dead lol.
Holy shit I’m the intro
FINALLY MY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED about whether or not the un-CAS-able tank could die from a lancaster!
If a PE-8 with 5k can kill it, a Lancaster can kill it... Think au little man.
@@hypophiseadenome well i didnt know the PE-8 could kill it so...
You can see it in the video at the end... You comment without watching ? WTF...
@@hypophiseadenome i was just excited to find a video that shows the Obj 279's limit bc i have been searching for the past 2 days...
So i left a comment THEN watched it...
The fun part is that it as no lancaster in the video because the pe-8 kill it...
It's not made to survive the explosion just the blast, "if it hit the roof or the hull it would destroyed it" as far as I know there's no tank that can survive a direct hit from a 100/200kg bomb
I've seen it survived 1k bombs that landed on the engine deck. Bombs landing on the roof is a very possible kill though. Bullpup rockets can kill it that way so no doubt bombs would too.
@@barronhelmutschnitzelnazi2188 to be fair ive seen a l3/33 survive a fab5000 that landed basically on top of it
I wish that dude was a bit more accurate, you'd still survive a surprising amount but you'd definitely die more
Wish i could get this. Too bad i wasnt playing warthunder before it released and now with its hell of a price point
war thunder should of sponserd, not some shit ptw game
Okay, here’s why the bombs never hurt the crew
The object 279 was designed to be blast proof to nuclear weapons to an extent, meaning, everything should be alright when hit, so war thunder coded the crew impossible to kill with bombs
No, it's not. It was meant to be deployed in a post-nuclear apocalyptic environment. If anything, the engineers hoped that it could survive the shockwave of a nuclear blast at the very edge of it, due to the extra tracks, but this was never tested. It did however have anti-radiation lining and such. So, in conclusion, the armor was arranged this way to give it the best possible protection ever, the nuclear part of it was just propaganda. If anything it would've been shockwave-proof, not blast proof.
@@darthnihilus2729 Warthunder players when Tank doesnt survive a direct hit from a Nuclear Missile: 😱
Good to know is there someone who drop bombs worse than me xD
I don’t understand this. It was designed by o survive the shockwave and and not flip over in a blast. Not survive the actual explosion the heat would still vaporize the tank
Obj 279 is ass approved oh sorry CAS 😂
perfectly balanced as all thing should be
oop I thought it was gunna be for real, not a game, thats actually pretty unrealistic considering the dev's dont know....and tend not to research..
anyway.. oh wow... watch that I'll say its very unrealistic...is energy not calculated? example a normal 500 Pound bomb of a dauntless diving at 350 miles an hour hits with almost 5 tons of force.. ps some even went THROUGH entire AIRCRAFT CARRIERS DECKS 10 feet of steel? gee ya dont think huh..even if the bomb had no explosives it would definitely leave one mighty dent.. ( crushed most tanks in fact nevermind the explosives detonating after the fact (insult to injury LOL)
Pro tipp: you can press "O" to see an X-Ray of the damaged compartments
Gaijin: realistic russian documints show that crew is made from stalinium and has 300% health
Russian bias didnt exsis...
I wanna take this further into a a little fun made up scenario.
Its 1950 something kind of area it we're in (insert map)
So the Americans, british, French and germans are on one team and the soviets are on the other.
The soviets have brought our their new super tank. The object 279 (she has got some other random tanks as well) to stop the advance of these countries.
They cause trouble walking through the ranks of the ground forces and even the helicopters cant kill it.
So they call the fleet.
The carrier (lets say forrestal) launch aircraft (ranks 3 to 5) to assist.
Can they stop these monsters before they take too many losses?
Could be fun.
You should try this in arcade mode for better accuracy
Объект 279 в жизни:создан чтобы пережить ударную волную ядерной бомбы
Объект 279 в wt :переживает ядерный взрыв в его эпицентре
A tank is designed to SURVIVE a nuclear war, not to SURVIVE a nuclear war.A tank is built to SURVIVE a nuclear war, not to SURVIVE a nuclear strike
5:30 nah it’s ass proof
who the fuck dropped these bombs. their aim sucks. why didnt you just go into arcade mode?
wtf, just take a tank with a tandem ATGM, this "bias" dies from 1-2 missiles IN THE FOREHEAD
All the times he flipped reminds me of the time when I was chilling in my M4 and then a bomb blew up next to me killing a teammate and flipping over next to a building. I asked teammates near me to help me in chat but they ignored me. Then an enemy tank came right behind me a killed me. :/