Real People are delusional Especially women can't accept reality about their looks But hey if it makes them feel better about themselves who cares I guess
It is just delusional tbh. The vast majority of us are in the middle area of the bell curve within many aspects of our lives, attractiveness, skills, personality, profession, etc...WIth the most basic understanding of statistics, unless you're really sure, putting yourself within that 4-6 range has like 80% of being objectively correct
Yep. I'm someone who has literally been told several times that I "could model" by women and still only think i'm a 6/10. I can't imagine how guys who are less attractive than me who don't get these types of compliments could possibly think they're 7+/10. Same for women lol.
If you were told you could model, then you are definitely not a 6 and are very likely to be higher than 7.5, probably pushing 9. So you may be delusional but in the opposite sense, that you lower your attractiveness.@@thelonercoder5816
People's perception of a "5" is so low despite it being bang on average. If asked a little differently, I feel like most folks who call themselves a 7 would agree they're realistically only "average"
Would be interesting to see a test like that But considering how many women literally rate themselves 10/10 perfection I think the results wouldn't be that different
It’s probably because of people viewing the spectrum as if it’s a grade, in which 70% is equated as a C and treated as a decently average score, whereas anything below that is failing. Therefore, 6 and below is terrible, and 7 is average
@@ShadowJinxXOX its because people usually dont want to classify them selves as average, its called the "above-average effect" if you ask people their driving skills, looks etc most of them will claim they are above average.
the issue is the people are answering a different question than what they're being asked. they're being asked "where do you think you statistically belong on a scale from 0 to 10" and they're answering "how do you feel about your body image on a scale from 0 to 10" basically there is a validity issue in your sociological research because you are measuring something else than what you think you are. the research is, in my opinion, invalid. maybe the findings could be used to explore how people mix up the two
I completely agree. The question specifically asks how they rate their *looks* on a scale from 1 to 10 (at 0:23), not how confident or attractive they see themselves. I think they should have clarified the question or they should have guided the subjects beforehand. They could also ask a follow-up question on how they view their overall attractiveness. The way this was handled makes the results pretty useless and shows how easy it is to miss the obvious problems in such a survey.
@@CaptainPanick Yes this flaw in the study is punctuated by multiple participants saying something like "I don't think others see me this way but this is how I see myself" kind of thing.
When I was a child I noticed that when we got a new kid in class they looked weird to me but after a few weeks they looked normal like the others. I guess I experienced exposure effect and it was much stronger when I was so young because I haven’t seen many faces before.
While I understand that feeling, this year I started uni and the first days I swear I felt pretty intimidated by all the “good looking” people there were on my classes. But after a couple of weeks I realized they were all ugly asf lol like average at most haha and I talked about it with a friend and she said had a similar experience. I guess after spending more time seeing each others faces I started noticing all their imperfections and probably my perception on their personalities affected how (un)attractive I started seeing them
@@agme8045That’s really interesting, back in my 20’s I felt like people were much prettier in my college town than in my smaller home town and it made me feel insecure. Now that I think about it, it propably wasn’t even true.
@@agme8045 Interesting. I experience the opposite affect. I generally find people more attractive the longer I know them, not less. As an artist, I also tend to see most people as attractive because I find unique features so interesting and appealing. It's like looking at variations in landscapes. In my experience, I can find beauty in each one.
@@agme8045 usually you start finding people more attractive the more you see them unless you find their personality really unpleasant, i think the fact that you start finding people ugly stems from your own insecurities and you trying to protect yourself from feeling too inferior, thus you actively look for reasons to find people ugly
With that said. ... I rate myself a minus 5. I'm not compatible with anyone and I would not be a good wife to anyone. I am less than human because I'm a woman.
@@CRM-114that's the problem. A 5 is not ugly. 5 is average. Below 2 is ugly. Below 5 is just off average. For example being 15 lbs overweight makes a 5 turn into a 4. Being a 5 but not fixing orthodontics or having unkempt hair turns them into a 4. Being a 5 but having a great six pack or yoga fitness level turns a 5 to a 6. People clearly don't understand what average means. 0 is Quasimodo and 10 is like reputable model agency picks you out of a crown and offers you a contract.
It depends on the question, are they saying it's specifically about physical attraction? And who determines this objective standard? Someone 10 could be another person's 8
@@Tily-vh3ly exactly, I can agree there is of course objectivity linked to our natural desire to seek out healthy partners, and certain features being markers of health. Things like healthy bodyweight, facial symmetry and harmony, taller height amongst men (generally), wider hips amongst women, etc
I'm curious how the results would change if you rephrased the question as "how do you believe others would rate you" instead of "how would you rate yourself"
Why do ppl always think rating yourself 10/10 is unrealistic? If your first way of thinking is to compare yourself to someone else who looks nothing like you, you’re never going to win… why not truly rate yourself by your own standards un compared to others 😂
@@ShutupandListen is it not equally valid to have a concrete assessment of how others see you, thus enabling you to accurately predict and model your expectations on the world's response to you?
@@ShutupandListenis it healthy to have a high weight, matted hair, unclear skin, and lopsided features? Fetal alcohol syndrome also causes certain facial features
Now that's a good idea. Would hopefully wake up to reality the *countless* males in my country that are in the 1-3 category and have the nerve to act as if they were above-average, let alone "a perfect 10".
Interesting how often 7 is said, for most people it seems as if 7 perfectly encapsules "I look good but not perfect" which I believe is a really common thought most people have regarding their looks. It does not make any sense mathematically for everybody to be a 7, but it all falls down on how you define "good but not perfect". Everybody wants to be above average as well, which might contribute to the trend towards 7.
The thing Is they look good for themselves, they base that 7 on how some days they look better, but they're not comparing their looks to the most attractive people they have seen, If they did they would know they're average
Get a literal 10/10 model to interview them and see them stammer snd sweat when their perception of their own beauty is thrown into their face by a god
I come from a family of models I’m : 6’1”, athletic near perfect body, handsome face. I’m a 6.5 10 is perfect. People have no idea what That means. An 8 is literally a gorgeous supermodel. 10 is perfect …….. perfect ……. Most people are 1-2 on an honest scale If average is 5 . Average always changes. And you can’t tell the big difference between average and beautiful
Huge issue with this social experiment being how the question was asked - the fact that so many of them are bringing up confidence and personal anecdotes shows that they’re not trying to rate themselves realistically in a logical distribution. They’re answering about how they feel about themselves, which is a totally different question than “how attractive do you think you are objectively respective to the rest of the world”
Yeah, but if you’re attract a lot of people regardless of the “objective” standard. You are attractive so the rating is right. Also there really isn’t an objective standard it’s influenced a lot by culture, your personal age, what other people say, social media, and trends.
@@sweetxjc If there was no objective standard, then there would not be a tendency of models to have similar features. All models are tall. All models are lean. All models have sharp eyes and defined jaws. All models have decent hairlines. All models have very clear skin. All models have well-sized lips. All models have good jaw projection. Moreover, these things are on a scale themselves. As in they're normally distributed, so the degree to which you fall into the upper percentiles indicates the degree to which you are model-tier looking. Models are in the 99th percentile for every one of those features. People who are average either are average in all those aspects or they're in the upper percentiles for some features and in the lower percentile for others. Most of the people in the video had some decent qualities but also had major flaws that would make them lean more toward average. Other people were below average. E.g. no person with a recessed jaw is ever going to be at or above a 5. Also, a lot of them were fat. So, that drops you down by 1 to 2 points by default.
Even then, many comments here conflate overall attractiveness with literal beauty, as in looking at the face and ignoring everything else that actually makes a person attractive.
I think people find others less attractive due to photoshop and social media. A lot of males rated Margot Robbie mid or say Sandra bullock looks male. This was entirely different 10 years ago… so I’d take peoples opinions with a grain of salt
@@Havana428Not everyone automatically tries to gauge a score out of 10 based on where they think it would stand on a normal distribution… that’s like saying you have to rate every average movie you watch 5/10. I dont blame other people for not being on the same page as you…
@@AerisNotAerith well yeah, this may be true. It depends on how you view stuff. If you are more analytical you may wanna be more exact and closer to reality but it’s hard to judge your own level of attractiveness nonetheless.
@@ramsaybolton9151 at first yes, and it also depends on what the type of relationship. But how a person makes you feel, their personality unironically, amongst other things can lead to genuine attraction that tips the scale over time
@@NoRockinMansLand Idk man there are people with great personalities that I will never be attracted to because they don't have the physical "pattern" I desire. Personality helps you decide between people that already have the physical "pattern" you desire.
@@ramsaybolton9151 yes, I agree. That's why I said it plays the largest part at first. People typically consider other factors after the person has met the looks threshold (when someone looks "acceptable enough" to date, according to that person).
It's great you found so many confident young people, this honestly surprised me considering the impact of social media on mental health. I'd love to see the same survey done with people in their 40s and 50s.
I think you need to keep in mind that there's a vast difference between how people actually perceive themselves, and what they'll say if asked. Many of them are giving an answer that will "save face" because they feel like attraction equates value, hence giving yourself a "bad" grade would reflect poorly on your worth and your perceived self-confidence. Also, the question needs to be precise : "how do you think others would rate you" will not get the same answer as "how do you rate yourself". You can literally see these people answering based on their self-confidence, personnality, ego etc instead of social standards for beauty.
The people that call themselves a 10 and then say "Gotta be confident" are literally the most insecure people you're ever gonna meet. And also that's not confidence that's straight up delusion.
Trust me when I say that reality will hit most of them like a truck. Even then some of them will still justify their behavior, thinking it's because they're a 10😢😂
You're mixing it up. Many of them are aware of the fact that they're likely not perceived as 10s. They just do so LITERALLY because they feel as though that's going to boost their self esteem
Its interesting that the noticably attractive people are the only people who are accurate with their rating. Probably just because most people fall into the same delusion, only the attractive people just happen to look like the delusion.
I suspect it's because the truth isn't as painful for attractive people as it is for unattractive ones. Allowing them to be more honest with themselves without falling into despair.
I think it was the channel Jubilee that had a thing where they put 100 people in a room and then everyone needed to find whoever was rated the hottest. Even in the beginning some very good looking people eliminated themselves. The last 10 had like 3 people who were even fuckable. The uggos forced their way into the top 10 by being stubborn as hell and refusing to leave thinking it made them look confident but it did the exact opposite.
I just love that they put effort into looking and feeling nice! This goes a very long way, and there's something so... cute about it. Taking care of yourself is important!
Yeah , social world is moved by what other's think and people's perception on you matters where you stand socially . Which is quite impossible not to care . Probably you can say that , so you can do some out of ordinary stuff , but still how social world will judge you will impact it .
Wtf, most of these people are 4 to 6. Actual 7-10s are literal models or people that you would stop and stare at on the street because they are gorgeous and stunning! I think people tend to think that a 7/10 is average because that corresponds to a 70% = C grade (in America). People don’t grasp the concept of a bell curve or normal distribution
The question wasn’t “where do you see yourself in the the curve of normal distribution” though. Avarage ppl around me seems still very good looking to me and I would still rate them 7. Because I see 10 as perfect, 9-7 as very good looking 5 - not great not terrible 4-3 unattractive 2-1 really unattractive. Everyone is havinh their own scale and I dunno what makes ppl think it should correspond to normal distribution.
@anastazka00 attractiveness is objectively distributed on a normal distribution. Most large data sets in life follow the normal curve where the vast majority fall somewhere in the middle of a scale (3-6 in this case). As you go to more extreme sides (1s and 10s), the number of people goes down because extremes are more rare in life.
Nothing's inherently wrong with overrating yourself. It's only wrong when you do that while looking down on others. Hell, it's wrong to look down on others even if you're indeed a 9 or a 10, yet these people in the comments would give you a pass simply because you're that good-looking. People think overrating yourself implies looking down on others when that's not necessarily the case.
No one thinks that lol. People in the comments simply are calling out on how these average-looking people at best, rate themselves rather high on the scale, and give all of these excuses about how they are comfortable in the own skin and they are very confident, when that’s literally not the point of the video or the question. They are supposed to objectively rate their attractiveness, and the only way of doing that is literally comparing the way you look to how others look. It’s not about getting a passing grade, it’s about truthfully stating your level of attractiveness. Your face is a 5 regardless of how confident you are. The people were literally saying “I know other people would rate me lower but I think I’m an 8”, THATS THE WHOLE POINT lol how would others rate you, how would most people perceive you.
Overrating yourself *does* imply that you expect a certain treatment from others. I've seen and heard of *countless* males in the 1-3/10 category acting as if not only they *deserved* women in the 8-10 category, but also that "they shouldn't compensate by providing" for such women. Nothing short of delusional.
No, I think a lot of people would look negatively at over-rating because it's an indication that you're not able to assess things more objectively, truthfully, rationally, realistically. It's an indication that you're not able to be fine with reality. And this is not a positive thing. Someone who can truthfully admit they are a 4 and be totally fine with it is someone who is actually confident and rational.
1-Horrible disfigurement 2-Many glaring issues 3-probably one huge glaring issue perhaps a massive nose 4- perhaps a person with a weak jaw or slight overbite 5-average,not going to be stealing any looks. 6- people might look your way 7- either a pretty face,physique, or stature. 8-more than a couple good characteristics 9-Everything 10- i think the personality and exposure to this person makes them a 10. They have everything YOU like while also have everything a 9 is.
I don’t think a weak jawline or slight overbite instantly qualifies a 4. I’ve seen very attractive people with this trait that make up for it in other attractive features, especially women.
..the people that said “10” , know damn well, that they are not…it’s ok to be average…u dont appear “confident” when u inflate ur rating, u seem to be insincere/delusional/etc…
@@sarazigova1641 ..the closest i have ever seen is a prime Brad Pitt…and im a straight male, ha…but, gdamn, bro was flawless..hair/face/physique…unreal..
Did you explain to them that the scale is on a curve, or just asked them the question? It sounds like a lot of people believe 7/10 is a C, which is PASSING. It should be a 5/10, which is equivalent to a C, but American grading systems push it higher up. The really hot ones that rated themselves 8 are the only ones who seem to be self aware. The others are all 3-6 but all rated themselves 7-8.
@@sarazigova1641 Yes. It is a bell curve, so the majority of people are 5. That is average, so people you see and forget. There are as many 10/10 as 1/10, which means basically none. To find one of those is basically impossible. Like, as humans, we can empathize even with grossly disfigured people, so having them genuinely be a 1/10 is difficult. Most attractive people, then, would fall into the 7/8 category. Same with notably unattractive people really being 2/3.
I love that we now agree dehumanising people based on race is cruel and morally repugnant, but we're still thrilled to assign ourselves and others a number grade for our physical attractiveness. The disconnect is just astounding.
yoooo new quoves vid the people getting angry at rating themselves high are interesting to me. even if to you it may not be “correct” it does feel like people get angry at people being happy with themselves and the way they look(yes, being happy with yourself is different to objectively looking attractive to people). although i do agree that people who rate themselves higher without any thought into it are interesting i don’t think it’s reasonable to put them down or say “they look bad” because obviously they do to themselves and is why this is rating themselves. not other people rating them.
Maybe its because of access They believe they are a certain number and once someone they believe to be on the same level rates themselves higher They get angry because they got degraded and cheated of a chance with them.
YES this weird phenomenon where a “ugly” person rate themselves higher on beauty scale and the negative reactions they get is odd. Like so what a “ugly” person think they’re attractive 😭
They all pick 7/10 because they think it's not too risky but still 2 points above 5. It means that they're afraid to be average. 6 is not far enough from the averageness so they pick the number just above.
Hi Qoves Studio, I remember you once quoted a study that said people are more honest (realistic) about where they stand on the 1-10 when next to someone who truly has a high sexual market value (SMV). With that in mind, if you did another video like this, would you consider having the men and women stand next to an actual high SMV model and then ask them to rate themselves? I would be curious to see what people would rate themselves 1-10 while standing next to an actual 8 in looks and body?
And ask them to rate themselves with excluding number 7. And the high one should come and everybody, without enhancement, no make up, no super styled hair, natural hair, no jewellry, no nice clothes, NO surgery and fillers or whatever, a white or black T-shirt and basic jeans. Then it would be more accurate. Everybody in their NATURAL state. This is how you know if you are naturally beautiful
That's really interesting. Great idea! Although I think if they stood next to a 10/10 model, they might still give themselves a 7 because a 7 is still obviously below the highly attractive person. Maybe put a solid seven next to them?
There was a documentary that did something similar, and what was most shocking is that the women (there were no men in the experiment) just rated the model higher. The researchers' hypothesis (which I agree with) was that rating yourself as a 6~7 is safe. It is above 5 which is average (and no one wants to be average) but not so high like an 8 or 9 which would cause them to face reality in the form of negative criticism from objective observers of their beauty. Anyway the model used was about a 7.5~8 but because most of the women wanted to label themselves as a 7 they knew standing next to another 7 would instantly make them a lair so they rated the model as a 10... Oh, and the reason I said the model was a 7.5~8 is because of another prior experiment in which they had a few hundred people rate the model from 1-10. Personally, I thought most of the women fell into the average range 4~5, so I don't know why they were so determined to be 7's.... Seriously! Ask any unfortunate person whose looks rate about 2~3.5, and they would LOVE to be considered at least average (5 out 10) looking.
The first girl who rated herself a 5 is better looking than all of the girls who rated themselves 7s and 8s. A lot of delusion going around. It's not self-confidence.
No that’s 80% of perfection which is still a long way from perfect considering how really small changes that most people can’t even vocalize have immense implications for perceived attractiveness
@@sashab5809so 30% of the scale used to measure all humanity is reserved for identifying the minute differences in attractiveness between the tiny few hot enough to be models?
It's always the people that say "self love is important" and rate themselves a 10 that are the most insecure about their bodies and hate themselves. I don't know why people falsely portray confidence, it's not attractive to be fake or delusional.
@@5-es4mnI think that’s the other extreme. People who looking alright but rating themselves a 1-3 are trying to fish for compliments or want to get seen as very very humble
why do people always assume that not rating yourself as perfect = low confidence? You can be objective about where you stand and still be confident in yourself. I rate myself based on my dating success. Unless i'm a guy who gets women at the snap of a finger, i'm not a 10/10 lol. Objectively, i'd say i'm a 6/10. Slightly above average.
Probably they wishful think that overrating themselves will magically increase their attractiveness in the other person's eyes. Never the case though. In fact, if someone who's (for example) a 3-4/10 in my eyes starts acting c0cky, they usually become a 2 or even 1.
@@kiravampira1456 esp if the person feels entitled to people because they think they're this extremely attractive person. Literally delusional. I've dealt with this before where below average to average looking women act like they're 10s and get mad when I reject them lol
Thank you! Besides, being confident when you have nothing to be confident about is silly. If you look like a failed science experiment, stay out of other people’s sight as much as you can and be humble. Contribute to the world using other skills
A good scale is whether one kind of fades into the background, or stands out (one way or the other). If you are typically overlooked, then you're around average (4-6). If you really stand out (either really good, or really bad) then you're on the ends of the scale(1-2, 8-10), and if you are sometimes noticed but not enough to really stand out, then you're in the middle (3 or 7).
This is called PHOTOFEELER an app you post a pic vote and get voted on by strangers . This is the best way to get an idea where your attractive level is out of 10. Sample size matters so at least 100 votes to get a clear idea of your attactive level. Most of the people in this video are 4-6 Maybe 1 or 2 7's
i think a lot of people perceive the question asked as an overall score of how confident or overall good human being they are, when really the question is isolated to pure physical attraction of a human. And based purely on physical attactiveness, a lot of these people would be 4/5/6 out of 10 with regards to being judged purely on physical attraction. Maybe evolutionary it is an advantage to consider oneself more attractive to help with confidence in approaching a mate and finding a partner and ones general contentment with themselves. I dont know, but overall, it was interesting to see that there was a general trend of people thinking they were better looking than they were
I rate myself as a 5.5 but I'm probably a 5 somedays and a 6 others. A young attractive person would rate me lower whereas an old person who was never highly attractive growing up would rate me higher. So it depends who's rating. My mom rates me as an 8.
I feel so bad for the people he interviewed for this video. They were just asked to rate themselves and because they rated themselves “too high” the comments take every opportunity to shit on them. If most of the people in these comments were in this video they’d be deemed “ugly” by the comments too.
@@nairdazitro7460 also there are clearly attractive people being interviewed yet there’s comments saying “everyone is average or below”. imo that’s far too harsh.
Most people here were like 4s and 5s with some 6-6.5s sprinkled in. I think rating on a bell curve is the best way. According to the bell curve, a 7 and above is in the top 2% of looks, so a 7+ is reserved for models. I consider a 6 a good looking/cute person.
Totally agree. I rate myself several points below what other people rate me. I often catch strangers staring at me appreciatively. I think it's cause other ppl have awful taste.
@@user-yb6tk1ru6xSAMEEEEE, literally get told that I could model by both women and men, have been told multiple times in public that I’m “so pretty”, stared at, etc., but I want to throw up every time I see myself 😭😭😭
Also, you are totally correct about how dating apps are too brutal, because they encourage participants to skip over people who would make good matches.
The dating app thing is SO TRUE. Like omg you KNOW RIGHT AWAY when you see someone in person vs their photos. Also I start to like people the more I get to know them
Level 10 attractiveness does not equal no flaws imo. Perfection is actually less attractive, more of an anomaly or spectacle but not truly attractive, imo.
The problem with this scales is pretty consistent throughout any kind of "ratings" People tend to utilize barely half of said scale, so in the end we are coming to situation where the real 1 is 5, and 7-8 is like the middle, while anything below 5 just barely exist and almost never used So, scales just stop making any sense whatsoever
Yeah, and when you look at the population around 5% of people are below 5/10, around 85% are average so 5 to lets say 7-10, leaving around 10% of being those above average 7+/10s.
@@cheytacpraetoriancomposite3413 the problem again is in perception. People often consider 5 as some kind of line for "less is definitely ugly", when 5 is literally just The Average. 5% you mentioned are not "slightly below average", they are on the lower end of the scale, so we should look at 1-2. Otherwise, again, 1-10 pont scale literally loosing it's meaning, because you use 1-5 scale with added 5 free point for everyone only to project "niceness", "positivity" and be "uplifting"
@@vanderdik7185 Yeah you are correct, I suggested that -5/10 being below average because of social experiments pretty much showing that if you are slightly below average in modern days you are basically fighting for scraps, those 5% and 10% people are the only major difference. The top 10% people are going to be attractive to absolutely everybody and the down 5% are going to be ugly for everybody and not a single person will say otherwise unless they are being dishonest. Those 85% of convencionally attractive people will be the target of preferance. I am in that range altho I have few strong features that stand out from the average and for one women I can be super ugly and for other I am a bedtime material.
Yeah, but physical attraction is to a large degree still subjective so how would anyone know it was accurately used? Unless you ask a specific population of the same culture and age range with the same exposure to similar media, there will never be an objective standard
Calling yourself an 8, 8.5, or 10 is crazyyyy. Nobody in this video was above a 7 and most were like a 5 or lower lmao. It's insane that people think "well i put effort into being presentable" or "I'm confident so therefore I'm a 10" lmao like plz be so for reallll
There were definitely above averge people here.... I'm too lazy to find the rest buy 6:59 girl was super pretty. 2:32 girl also has a lot of potential like her eyes are pretty and features
@@victoriancarwash4393 nah you would just rather people lie to you so that your feelings don't get hurt. I'm begging y'all to be realistic. Not everyone needs to be beautiful but calling everyone a 8, 9, or 10/10 is delusional.
as someone who watch beauty pageant since the early 2000s like Miss Universe Pageant..these people wouldn't make it to the top 15 if they join the pageant. i wish i have their confidence...or delusion.
Hmm I’m a Slavic woman and retired agency model, I would put myself at 6, especially living in the west. Most of my features are more fitting to East Asian beauty standards and I think location and culture really plays a big role in our attractive perception. Also,Regardless of where you rate yourself you can still put 10/10 effort and time into looking and preserving your beauty so you feel confident!
Kudos to the ⅓ of participants being accurate and sincere. The woman in the icon with the green dress was nail on the head without sounding arrogant. The guy who rated himself as 2/10 seemed more a matter of honest but skewed perception due to a lack of confidence, rather than false modesty. He was better looking than he realised. I was surprised by this video, i thought a lot more people would have been more comfortable being honest. I also thought there'd by more false modesty. I would rate myself at 6 on a good day, and 4 on a bad day. What i have in a face and shape, i lose in short stature and pale complexion
also can someone explain this to me: in this video he talks about individuals rating themselves higher because we see our faces everyday and that familiarity makes us perceive ourselves to be more attractive BUT have you every taken a selfie you thought you looked nice but the longer you stare at that it, the uglier and weirder you think you look??!!
I think the rating yourself from 1-10 scale is more for fun than anything. I see myself as about a 6 out of 10, a little bit above average but nothing out of the ordinary. Sundays when I don't really go out and haven't done my makeup much or focused too much on making my hair look nice, I'm about a 5. When going out on a date with my boyfriend, trying to look my best, I'm a 6.5. My boyfriend though for some reason thinks I'm a 10/10, which is really sweet (maybe he's just saying that).
I have to wonder if people consider a 7/10 to be "average" because the U.S. grading standards for schools places 70%-79%, a "C," as average. And 50%-59% is an "F", or "fail"/"flunk."
@zara1559 I understand the differences in the grading systems, and I'd say the American one is inferior for sure. I could be wrong, but would you agree that Americans lean on the 1-10 looks scale more than in any other region? If British people (or anyone else) are picking up on certain trends from Americans, like the 1-10 scale, I wonder if British people would adopt the same attitudes even though they would be lifted from the American grading system. But it could also be the case that people are just rating themselves favorably. I would never rate myself because I feel I'd be too much in my head worried about over/under-rating myself to be objective.
@@bradentrice6615 C is considered satisfactory or good enough. The average grades are higher because of the competitive nature. If you get all Cs the chances you are going to higher education or whatever job opportunities is lower.
love you guys of this channel. i refused for long to watch these videos of you with opinions of other people because in majority is useless. but you didn't make just another of these videos that just show the opinions, you showed the data and reality behind. and that's the useful thing. love you.
The problem is the scale is subjective. I see 10 as perfect, 9-7 as very good looking 5 - not great not terrible 4-3 unattractive 2-1 really unattractive. Lots of ppl in the comment section seems to think the scale should be according to the normal curve of distribution. So what could be a 5 in their scale, meaning “avarage”, would be 7 in my scale, as avarage people around me are still pretty good looking. You should define the question better.
None are edited, the lighting/coloring (like highlights) is a little but features, face, all natural, only makeup is really my eyebrows and a tiny bit of mascara.
Long story short: * People broadly agree on who is attractive and who is not, but when it comes to you: 7 is the magic number. Most people rate themselves 7 out of 10, and also consider it to be the threshold for dating. * Implication is: less attractive people see themselves as more attractive, and more attractive people see themselves as less attractive. "Just above average" attractive people are aligned with external perception. * Most people over-rate themselves possibly because of 1/ exposure effect (the more you see sb, the more you like it), 2/ self-deception for confidence boost (which leads to more romantic success), 3/ focusing on different traits to judge oneself vs. others. * We prefer to be judged on our looks by strangers than our peers. It is less threatening. * Beyond looks, confidence and good personality are seen as attractive. And over-confident people have a competitive advantage. Cheers.
Don't take this channel too seriously. If it was a true educational channel they would have some sort of oversight by an authority be it a University or some other Institution. But as it currently stands they can basically upload anything, make it look objective and true when in reality there are possibly many biases involved. Most of their videos are pretty good but there are some where opinions definetly diverge. Point is don't believe everything at a whim. Especially for something which can be as subjective as beauty. They themselves said they changed their opinions over time how much is subjective and how much is objective. Just be critical.
??? Math has little do do with this. If their perception is that an average person is pretty then that’s their truth. That’s like saying that on the Richter scale, the average earthquake HAS to be a 5.0. No concept of statistics at all!
@@andy2641What's the point of rating people on a scale of 1 - 10 then, if everyone have their own scales? The number you say doesn't really mean anything either way.
@@amirtorhan2762 It's not that serious. I'm often asked stuff like "what did you think about this movie on a scale of 1-10?" or "how much do you like this food on a scale of 1-10?". I also come across rating sites for movies and music like letterboxd and rateyourmusic. These scales are to assess how much a person likes something. Attractiveness is subjective, so you cannot create a universal standard scale for it. I assume the scale you are thinking of is a scale of fitting to societal beauty standards.
@@andy2641 You have no clue what you are talking about. Of course attractiveness is subjective but that has nothing to do with it. When someone asks you to rate someone from 1-10, you are supposed to give them a number from 1 to 10 where the average person will be a 5. But due to most people being people-pleasers and also seem to lack understanding of the entire concept. The majority of people will rate with extreme biases, where most people will be 7s or even 8s. This is foolishness and completely illogical, and no it doesn't mean that they think the "average person is pretty". It means that the average is 7-8 instead which doesn't make any sense. This kills the entire idea of the scale because it will be completely distorted and it means the actual attractive people (those who are real 8s or 9s) will barely be differentiated by the average and slightly above average because there is no room in the scale. You bringing up other scales like Richter scale which is a completely different thing just shows your lack of knowledge. FYI Richter scale is not even a linear scale, it's a logarithmic scale which also doesn't have any limits.
Interestingly I found Tamiranashe at 7:48 who rated herself a 6 to be one of the more attractive women in this. Maybe because i find the delusional overconfidence in your own attractiveness in itself very unattractive. She just had a more positive aura about her than most women rating themselves high.
I feel attractiveness is subjective, and so much influences how we see/rate others and ourselves. One person in a line up could see someone as a 8 because they think they're very attractive, or it is there preference, while another person in the same line up could see someone as a 4. They have different preferences and ideas of what's attractive.
There some common things that are attractive and things that are not most people are average or below average 4s and 5 where the more attractive people are 6s 7s with few 8s eight is less the 1% of the world and tens is not something you will see for very long because it basically perfect and can’t be or stay perfect
@@MultiSciGeekYou have low physical standards if you think that woman is a 10. Think about it for a moment. If she is a 10, then what is Megan Fox in her prime? Or Heidi Klum? Or Angelina Jolie?
Its not that deep, most people think average is 7, and 5 is below average and anything below 5 being repulsive. Most these people are okay looking, and they think theyre okay looking. All these people in the comments usually without profile pics foaming at the mouth in rage is just laughable. So they love themselves, Jung said the things that make people angry are usually also ditected towards themselves, so maybe u guys should learn to love yourself
Agreed. I'm starting to extremely dislike this channel and its community for its pretentious attitude about this. Most people simply see 7 as the average, so they're likely to rate themselves as that. Plain and simple. It doesn't mean they think they're above average. It doesn't mean they think they're extremely good-looking. Their scale is just different.
@@chillblue1650 With the millions of unique people on this planet, the obsession of beauty and the very narrow parameters placed on it is unfortunate. I feel for the younger generation who are exposed to so many videos centered on beauty and altering appearance. Besides TV and magazines, I had little of it growing up. The only people I have ever considered "ugly" have been cruel, mean, or perverted. There is a strong association for me with attractiveness and personality.
Nah people just don’t want to admit that they are inferior. I like to think I’m smarter than average even though I’m probably normal intelligence. People who rate themselves 7 do it because of self-preservation rather than because it’s the objective truth
It’s also important to note the grading system here 7=70=C grade. These people are actually calling their looks equivalent to a passing C grade and y’all think they’re egotistical.
Yeah a bunch of incels using their ridiculous scale who want everyone to be as miserable as them. They literally tell people to give up because of the angle their eyes tilt lmao. And they think other people are delusional.
@@videofan1010 but the point remains the same, with grading in mind these people are are actually being humble. But our host thought that they were being egotistical.
@@EmalineStannphill-u6h dont worry its what everyone thinks in person, just doesnt want to say it to your face. There's no hope for "well maybe if im confident!" You are bang average
I feel like the comment section is jealous about the inner confidence of some of the participants. Inner confidence comes from the deepest Essence of a person. You prefer seeing someone with low self-esteem crying in order to feel good abt yourselves ( like am not the only one who think that i look like peace of shit) . Trust me no one is ugly it just so weired to see Humans calling other humans ugly .you know humans are not objects to rates. Don't let people take the inner light from you . Accept and love how God designed you . People's opinions don't matter.they are not you. The comment section shows how superficial most people are .
Its crazy, not a single person who said 7 is even close, especially the women. They were all 3-5. I think rating yourself is a perfect summary of your personality
Please make a video about the width of the nose and the tip of the nose, and how it affects the beauty of women. For example, if a woman has an unusually wide nose for her ethnic group
Are those confident people really just lying to themselves? Even at my best I never would have rated myself so high. What is it like to live without insecurities!! A dream!!
if you take the same interview with the people of south asian countries, i believe majority of them would rate themselves quite lower in compared to them. It again comes down to childhood and how you were raised. Most asian people are raised with strict parents and with less validations. For instance the parents kind of force their childs to achieve the perfect grades on everything. That's why asian people are never quite comfortable with their self worth. Always in the competition of acheiving that perfect position. Thats why have less self-esteem and arrogance in compared to people of the west like we can see in the video.
Former teenage model and now plastic surgeon here. (I modeled for Abercrombie and Fitch and Hollister, I am a man). When people ask me what I’d rather myself, I give myself a 6.5 or so because someone who is a 7-8 is exceptionally attractive and a 9-10 is ultra rare throughout history. I get the most ridiculous comments “who hurt you,” “where’s your confidence?” Extremely annoying that these people do this.
The problem is not that people overrate themselfs, its the 10 rating itself. What is a 1, what is a 10. Is 5 absolute average? Is a mega super model a 10? Or do we consider them above that because nobody looks like that? The rating is not able to be represantive of a real beauty standard, it discribes only how well people feel in their body.
The girl at 0:57 in my opinion doesn't look good in that shot, but i think she definitely has the potential. If she had put on colorful clothes, sat up straight and put her hair different she would probably already look a lot better (in my opinion).
This subject is really interesting because it brings in other topics that can be related to it suck as If you rate yourself higher than average some would judge you or call you selfish or too confident or arrogant. And the people that rate themselves lower would be seen as not confident or shy or "a pick me" So the whole thing comes down to how you see yourself and how others see you and that can be poisoning As it can either make you too aware or careless and other people's opinions matter to almost everyone even if they say they don't care what others say. So in short this topic is very wide as it can be seen both positively and negatively and no matter what not everyone can come to an agreement on it in a lot of points Great video it's really interesting seeing how people view themselves and view others in their life.
she is absolutely beautiful in my opinion, even up to the way she carried herself. not sure why it was hardly said here. i wonder how successful women like her (who are gorgeous, but ethnic) are at dating in the western world.
Do you agree with me? Normal distribution meaning 68.2% would be 4,5 or 6. Sinead - 4 Oliwia - 4 Dan - 5 Ashritha - 3 Haydon - 5 Rebecca - 4 Corin - 6 Caeleigh - 4 Jaiten - 4 Isabella - 6 Ananya - 5 Joana - 5 Talia - 5 Shriya - 6 Leonard - 5 Emily - 5 Juliana - 3 Imran - 6 Simeon - 4 Tamiranashe - 4 Elysia - 5 Godwin - 5 Vinisha - 6 Gargi - 4 Samuel James - 7 Haydon - 5 Monalisa - 5 Elcy - 4 Sernila - 4 Joseph - 2 I am aware that 5/30 are not 4,5 or 6 which means that I only have 13.3% of this sample size which are more than one standard deviation apart from the mean. For a bigger sample size it should be 31.8%. Please let me know what you think :)
Bruh there is no objective standard, but yeah the majority of people naturally will fit the 4-6 range. But that is generally speaking, someone's 6 is another person's 7. Someone's 5 is another person's 3
I think people are forgetting what actual “confidence” is. Confidence should be the absolute belief in something that is actually true. If you’re ugly but confident, that doesn’t mean you lie to yourself and tell yourself you’re beautiful. It means you know you’re ugly but you’re perfectly fine with it and it doesn’t bother you or matter to you in the slightest. And I think THAT is actually 100000% more attractive than being delusional.
I'd be interested to know if dating success is impacted by A. One's rating of oneself and B. The closesness of that rating to the rating given to them by third parties on average. eg take two fives, one who considers themselves an 8 and one who considers themselves a 5. Is it the overconfident one or the realistic one who is more likely to end up in a relationship?
It's very interesting how people see it as an insult to be considered averagely attractive and think it's humble to call yourself a 7 or even higher.
Real
People are delusional
Especially women can't accept reality about their looks
But hey if it makes them feel better about themselves who cares I guess
It is just delusional tbh. The vast majority of us are in the middle area of the bell curve within many aspects of our lives, attractiveness, skills, personality, profession, etc...WIth the most basic understanding of statistics, unless you're really sure, putting yourself within that 4-6 range has like 80% of being objectively correct
Yep. I'm someone who has literally been told several times that I "could model" by women and still only think i'm a 6/10. I can't imagine how guys who are less attractive than me who don't get these types of compliments could possibly think they're 7+/10. Same for women lol.
If you were told you could model, then you are definitely not a 6 and are very likely to be higher than 7.5, probably pushing 9. So you may be delusional but in the opposite sense, that you lower your attractiveness.@@thelonercoder5816
@@thelonercoder5816if you could model then you are most definitely not just slightly above average
People's perception of a "5" is so low despite it being bang on average. If asked a little differently, I feel like most folks who call themselves a 7 would agree they're realistically only "average"
Would be interesting to see a test like that
But considering how many women literally rate themselves 10/10 perfection I think the results wouldn't be that different
It’s probably because of people viewing the spectrum as if it’s a grade, in which 70% is equated as a C and treated as a decently average score, whereas anything below that is failing. Therefore, 6 and below is terrible, and 7 is average
A 7 is when you have average looks but you make an effort.
@@ShadowJinxXOX agree with this. Our mind goes back to school in which a 50% is terrible but a 70% is just about adequate.
@@ShadowJinxXOX its because people usually dont want to classify them selves as average, its called the "above-average effect" if you ask people their driving skills, looks etc most of them will claim they are above average.
the issue is the people are answering a different question than what they're being asked.
they're being asked "where do you think you statistically belong on a scale from 0 to 10"
and they're answering "how do you feel about your body image on a scale from 0 to 10"
basically there is a validity issue in your sociological research because you are measuring something else than what you think you are. the research is, in my opinion, invalid. maybe the findings could be used to explore how people mix up the two
I completely agree. The question specifically asks how they rate their *looks* on a scale from 1 to 10 (at 0:23), not how confident or attractive they see themselves. I think they should have clarified the question or they should have guided the subjects beforehand. They could also ask a follow-up question on how they view their overall attractiveness. The way this was handled makes the results pretty useless and shows how easy it is to miss the obvious problems in such a survey.
@@CaptainPanick Yes this flaw in the study is punctuated by multiple participants saying something like "I don't think others see me this way but this is how I see myself" kind of thing.
Yes, kaelia1118, people were answering the question incorrectly! I was really frustrated with some of "wishful thinking" answers!
This is spot on
Absolutely agree 💯
When I was a child I noticed that when we got a new kid in class they looked weird to me but after a few weeks they looked normal like the others. I guess I experienced exposure effect and it was much stronger when I was so young because I haven’t seen many faces before.
That’s a really interesting point! I experienced the same thing & never thought about it until just now lol
While I understand that feeling, this year I started uni and the first days I swear I felt pretty intimidated by all the “good looking” people there were on my classes. But after a couple of weeks I realized they were all ugly asf lol like average at most haha and I talked about it with a friend and she said had a similar experience. I guess after spending more time seeing each others faces I started noticing all their imperfections and probably my perception on their personalities affected how (un)attractive I started seeing them
@@agme8045That’s really interesting, back in my 20’s I felt like people were much prettier in my college town than in my smaller home town and it made me feel insecure. Now that I think about it, it propably wasn’t even true.
@@agme8045 Interesting. I experience the opposite affect. I generally find people more attractive the longer I know them, not less. As an artist, I also tend to see most people as attractive because I find unique features so interesting and appealing. It's like looking at variations in landscapes. In my experience, I can find beauty in each one.
@@agme8045 usually you start finding people more attractive the more you see them unless you find their personality really unpleasant, i think the fact that you start finding people ugly stems from your own insecurities and you trying to protect yourself from feeling too inferior, thus you actively look for reasons to find people ugly
Asking people what they rate their own attractiveness is more of a social and psychological question than it is an objective beauty standard question.
spot on
So you mean it's something more Subjective?
With that said. ... I rate myself a minus 5. I'm not compatible with anyone and I would not be a good wife to anyone. I am less than human because I'm a woman.
@@phoenixtoash2396girl, you need therapy.
@@phoenixtoash2396are you trolling?
Confident people don't need to self rate them a 10 to feel good, they'll be realistic and be fine with it
@@CRM-114what about someone that's not craving for validation? Or an old man, you think grampa gives a dump if he's not attractive anymore?
100%. A truly confident person would say with confidence I'm a solid 5!
@@CRM-114that's the problem. A 5 is not ugly. 5 is average. Below 2 is ugly. Below 5 is just off average. For example being 15 lbs overweight makes a 5 turn into a 4. Being a 5 but not fixing orthodontics or having unkempt hair turns them into a 4. Being a 5 but having a great six pack or yoga fitness level turns a 5 to a 6.
People clearly don't understand what average means. 0 is Quasimodo and 10 is like reputable model agency picks you out of a crown and offers you a contract.
It depends on the question, are they saying it's specifically about physical attraction? And who determines this objective standard? Someone 10 could be another person's 8
@@Tily-vh3ly exactly, I can agree there is of course objectivity linked to our natural desire to seek out healthy partners, and certain features being markers of health. Things like healthy bodyweight, facial symmetry and harmony, taller height amongst men (generally), wider hips amongst women, etc
I'm curious how the results would change if you rephrased the question as "how do you believe others would rate you" instead of "how would you rate yourself"
Some of these ppl seem to live in lala land so it would still be high.
Why do ppl always think rating yourself 10/10 is unrealistic? If your first way of thinking is to compare yourself to someone else who looks nothing like you, you’re never going to win… why not truly rate yourself by your own standards un compared to others 😂
@@ShutupandListen is it not equally valid to have a concrete assessment of how others see you, thus enabling you to accurately predict and model your expectations on the world's response to you?
@@ShutupandListenis it healthy to have a high weight, matted hair, unclear skin, and lopsided features? Fetal alcohol syndrome also causes certain facial features
Now that's a good idea. Would hopefully wake up to reality the *countless* males in my country that are in the 1-3 category and have the nerve to act as if they were above-average, let alone "a perfect 10".
Interesting how often 7 is said, for most people it seems as if 7 perfectly encapsules "I look good but not perfect" which I believe is a really common thought most people have regarding their looks. It does not make any sense mathematically for everybody to be a 7, but it all falls down on how you define "good but not perfect". Everybody wants to be above average as well, which might contribute to the trend towards 7.
7 becomes the new average, all the scale is now out of 14
People are delusional
The thing Is they look good for themselves, they base that 7 on how some days they look better, but they're not comparing their looks to the most attractive people they have seen, If they did they would know they're average
@@NoRockinMansLandPoatan is a 10 tho
@@TetsuoTakayamaCyberpunk facts lol
People unironically rate themselves 10/10, I get that confidence is good, but come on.. there's a difference between _confidence_ and _delusion_
I know right how dare these ugly mofos have confidence and see themselves in a positive light. How dare they not think of themselves as I see them
How did you get that emoji
Lol that's true hahahha
Where the hell did you find that emoji 😂😂
The emoji lol
I don't think people willing to speak in front of a camera are "regular" people. They are obviously more confident than when you ask in the streets.
Get a literal 10/10 model to interview them and see them stammer snd sweat when their perception of their own beauty is thrown into their face by a god
@Harry-hh1is some people didn't take creative writing classes and it really shows
I come from a family of models I’m : 6’1”, athletic near perfect body, handsome face. I’m a 6.5
10 is perfect. People have no idea what That means. An 8 is literally a gorgeous supermodel.
10 is perfect …….. perfect …….
Most people are 1-2 on an honest scale
If average is 5 . Average always changes. And you can’t tell the big difference between average and beautiful
true
@synchronis346 Imagine calling other people value system weird at the same time you mention Taylor Swift and Ellon Musk, lol
Huge issue with this social experiment being how the question was asked - the fact that so many of them are bringing up confidence and personal anecdotes shows that they’re not trying to rate themselves realistically in a logical distribution. They’re answering about how they feel about themselves, which is a totally different question than “how attractive do you think you are objectively respective to the rest of the world”
Yeah, but if you’re attract a lot of people regardless of the “objective” standard. You are attractive so the rating is right.
Also there really isn’t an objective standard it’s influenced a lot by culture, your personal age, what other people say, social media, and trends.
@@sweetxjc If there was no objective standard, then there would not be a tendency of models to have similar features. All models are tall. All models are lean. All models have sharp eyes and defined jaws. All models have decent hairlines. All models have very clear skin. All models have well-sized lips. All models have good jaw projection.
Moreover, these things are on a scale themselves. As in they're normally distributed, so the degree to which you fall into the upper percentiles indicates the degree to which you are model-tier looking. Models are in the 99th percentile for every one of those features. People who are average either are average in all those aspects or they're in the upper percentiles for some features and in the lower percentile for others.
Most of the people in the video had some decent qualities but also had major flaws that would make them lean more toward average. Other people were below average. E.g. no person with a recessed jaw is ever going to be at or above a 5. Also, a lot of them were fat. So, that drops you down by 1 to 2 points by default.
Even then, many comments here conflate overall attractiveness with literal beauty, as in looking at the face and ignoring everything else that actually makes a person attractive.
The average individual is out of touch and delusional.
I think people find others less attractive due to photoshop and social media. A lot of males rated Margot Robbie mid or say Sandra bullock looks male. This was entirely different 10 years ago… so I’d take peoples opinions with a grain of salt
I found quite a few of those people pretty unattractive and im surprised they rated themselves this high
Me too 😬
Same I was really surprised by some of them.
I think the girls tend to overrate themselves more too
Same here there would be a girl I'd rate a 2 and she'd be like "well today I didn't really dress up so I'd say a 7" lol
How dare they see themselves with kindness and optimism right?
Average is 5 btw, a lot of people always rate themselves as 7 but what they don’t understand is that’s ABOVE AVERAGE
@@CRM-114 I don't understand, how do you guys go about calculating that
Actually what they don’t understand is that logically on a bell curve a 7 is in fact a LOT above average 😂😂😂
@@Havana428Not everyone automatically tries to gauge a score out of 10 based on where they think it would stand on a normal distribution… that’s like saying you have to rate every average movie you watch 5/10. I dont blame other people for not being on the same page as you…
@@AerisNotAerith well yeah, this may be true. It depends on how you view stuff. If you are more analytical you may wanna be more exact and closer to reality but it’s hard to judge your own level of attractiveness nonetheless.
These people rating themselves a 7 is pretty fair though if you consider a huge percentage of the population is over 40 and obese.
For me it’s the question. Rating how attractive you are to yourself is not the same as thinking you’re a 10 generally.
Attraction is not purely physical
@@NoRockinMansLand it's like 90% physical
@@ramsaybolton9151 at first yes, and it also depends on what the type of relationship. But how a person makes you feel, their personality unironically, amongst other things can lead to genuine attraction that tips the scale over time
@@NoRockinMansLand Idk man there are people with great personalities that I will never be attracted to because they don't have the physical "pattern" I desire. Personality helps you decide between people that already have the physical "pattern" you desire.
@@ramsaybolton9151 yes, I agree. That's why I said it plays the largest part at first. People typically consider other factors after the person has met the looks threshold (when someone looks "acceptable enough" to date, according to that person).
It's great you found so many confident young people, this honestly surprised me considering the impact of social media on mental health. I'd love to see the same survey done with people in their 40s and 50s.
That was overconfidence more often than confidence
Theyd be more realistic
If youre a 3 and claim youre a 7, youre not really confident. Confidence would be owning the 3, not using 7 as a cop out.
I think you need to keep in mind that there's a vast difference between how people actually perceive themselves, and what they'll say if asked.
Many of them are giving an answer that will "save face" because they feel like attraction equates value, hence giving yourself a "bad" grade would reflect poorly on your worth and your perceived self-confidence.
Also, the question needs to be precise : "how do you think others would rate you" will not get the same answer as "how do you rate yourself". You can literally see these people answering based on their self-confidence, personnality, ego etc instead of social standards for beauty.
yea, just like the girl in video said that it’s so that to not “give off bad energy”
Actually a really good point
This + excluding number 7. :)
Well said
exactly. some of them even said it almost explicitly
The people that call themselves a 10 and then say "Gotta be confident" are literally the most insecure people you're ever gonna meet. And also that's not confidence that's straight up delusion.
Yeah it's not a real rating and they don't even pretend it is. Can they fool themselves that easily?!
They're the same people that when you reject them politely they absolutely flip out and insult you.
Trust me when I say that reality will hit most of them like a truck. Even then some of them will still justify their behavior, thinking it's because they're a 10😢😂
These are the people who install ten dating apps just to ghost all their dates to boost their confidence
You're mixing it up. Many of them are aware of the fact that they're likely not perceived as 10s. They just do so LITERALLY because they feel as though that's going to boost their self esteem
Its interesting that the noticably attractive people are the only people who are accurate with their rating. Probably just because most people fall into the same delusion, only the attractive people just happen to look like the delusion.
I suspect it's because the truth isn't as painful for attractive people as it is for unattractive ones.
Allowing them to be more honest with themselves without falling into despair.
@@sam1323123 yes
I think it was the channel Jubilee that had a thing where they put 100 people in a room and then everyone needed to find whoever was rated the hottest. Even in the beginning some very good looking people eliminated themselves.
The last 10 had like 3 people who were even fuckable. The uggos forced their way into the top 10 by being stubborn as hell and refusing to leave thinking it made them look confident but it did the exact opposite.
One of the best comments I've read under this video. Very well said.
Nah some people who said 10 were really attractive
I just love that they put effort into looking and feeling nice! This goes a very long way, and there's something so... cute about it. Taking care of yourself is important!
They don't put that much effort into their appearance or their guts wouldn't be hanging over their jeans
@AnAdorableWombat what do u even mean?
I think some part of it is, people will be more likely to hype you up if you’re ugly and more likely to drag you down if you’re pretty
Yes, I get hateful looks and insults from people who are more average or even less, and you end up alone.
7:56 i don’t believe anyone when they say they don’t care what others think
Yeah , social world is moved by what other's think and people's perception on you matters where you stand socially . Which is quite impossible not to care . Probably you can say that , so you can do some out of ordinary stuff , but still how social world will judge you will impact it .
Anybody who doesn't care and means it won't say it. They don't need to.
@@hiddenexit1027 THIS
EVERYTIME I HAVE TO RATE MYSELF I REMEMBER HENRY CAVILL EXIST, AND IM NOWHERE OVER 5 LOL.
I do the same but with Megan Fox and Adriana Lima
That man...... 😍
😂
You look very attractive in your pic, unless you have some weird asymmetry with the eyes that is hidden by the sunglasses.
@@amnbvcxz8650he's probably fishing for compliments.
Wtf, most of these people are 4 to 6. Actual 7-10s are literal models or people that you would stop and stare at on the street because they are gorgeous and stunning! I think people tend to think that a 7/10 is average because that corresponds to a 70% = C grade (in America). People don’t grasp the concept of a bell curve or normal distribution
The rating system is pretty stupid itself. I could never use it to determ someones attractiveness
The question wasn’t “where do you see yourself in the the curve of normal distribution” though. Avarage ppl around me seems still very good looking to me and I would still rate them 7. Because I see 10 as perfect, 9-7 as very good looking 5 - not great not terrible 4-3 unattractive 2-1 really unattractive. Everyone is havinh their own scale and I dunno what makes ppl think it should correspond to normal distribution.
@anastazka00 attractiveness is objectively distributed on a normal distribution. Most large data sets in life follow the normal curve where the vast majority fall somewhere in the middle of a scale (3-6 in this case). As you go to more extreme sides (1s and 10s), the number of people goes down because extremes are more rare in life.
I feel like most of the people on this interview are Australian or British. Not American, just based on accent
10s dont exist@@Anastazka00
Nothing's inherently wrong with overrating yourself. It's only wrong when you do that while looking down on others. Hell, it's wrong to look down on others even if you're indeed a 9 or a 10, yet these people in the comments would give you a pass simply because you're that good-looking. People think overrating yourself implies looking down on others when that's not necessarily the case.
No one thinks that lol. People in the comments simply are calling out on how these average-looking people at best, rate themselves rather high on the scale, and give all of these excuses about how they are comfortable in the own skin and they are very confident, when that’s literally not the point of the video or the question. They are supposed to objectively rate their attractiveness, and the only way of doing that is literally comparing the way you look to how others look. It’s not about getting a passing grade, it’s about truthfully stating your level of attractiveness. Your face is a 5 regardless of how confident you are. The people were literally saying “I know other people would rate me lower but I think I’m an 8”, THATS THE WHOLE POINT lol how would others rate you, how would most people perceive you.
Overrating yourself *does* imply that you expect a certain treatment from others. I've seen and heard of *countless* males in the 1-3/10 category acting as if not only they *deserved* women in the 8-10 category, but also that "they shouldn't compensate by providing" for such women. Nothing short of delusional.
No, I think a lot of people would look negatively at over-rating because it's an indication that you're not able to assess things more objectively, truthfully, rationally, realistically. It's an indication that you're not able to be fine with reality. And this is not a positive thing. Someone who can truthfully admit they are a 4 and be totally fine with it is someone who is actually confident and rational.
@@agme8045 The video is about how attractive _they_ think they are. Not how they think other people will percieve them.
There is something wrong with overeating yourself; it leads to you being overconfident and delusional.
1-Horrible disfigurement
2-Many glaring issues
3-probably one huge glaring issue perhaps a massive nose
4- perhaps a person with a weak jaw or slight overbite
5-average,not going to be stealing any looks.
6- people might look your way
7- either a pretty face,physique, or stature.
8-more than a couple good characteristics
9-Everything
10- i think the personality and exposure to this person makes them a 10. They have everything YOU like while also have everything a 9 is.
I did the same scale breakdown above lol
We disagree but brought up some similar qualifiers!
To find someone else so analytical is refreshing
I don’t think a weak jawline or slight overbite instantly qualifies a 4. I’ve seen very attractive people with this trait that make up for it in other attractive features, especially women.
Adriana Lima has a weak jaw
@@joshuasmith7089 idk what planet ur living on but that is not a weak jaw
Well by that I’m a 7! Was. I guess at 40 I’m probably a 6 now. 4 after waking up. 3 when I feel grungy & self conscious 😂
..the people that said “10” , know damn well, that they are not…it’s ok to be average…u dont appear “confident” when u inflate ur rating, u seem to be insincere/delusional/etc…
I don't think that real 10 exist, everyone has mistakes, nobody has all perfect features
@@sarazigova1641 ..the closest i have ever seen is a prime Brad Pitt…and im a straight male, ha…but, gdamn, bro was flawless..hair/face/physique…unreal..
@@kramer1372im a girl and there are tons of male supermodels who are hotter than brad pitt
@@valleyofthedolls hahahaha
@@valleyofthedollsim a man and I say there isn’t
Did you explain to them that the scale is on a curve, or just asked them the question?
It sounds like a lot of people believe 7/10 is a C, which is PASSING. It should be a 5/10, which is equivalent to a C, but American grading systems push it higher up.
The really hot ones that rated themselves 8 are the only ones who seem to be self aware. The others are all 3-6 but all rated themselves 7-8.
Got to agree, imo most of those people were between 3 and 5 with the ones who were more attractive being more realistic about how they look...
Well said.
What does the curve mean? Like there are same procentage of people who are 9/10 and 1/10?
@@sarazigova1641 Yes. It is a bell curve, so the majority of people are 5. That is average, so people you see and forget. There are as many 10/10 as 1/10, which means basically none. To find one of those is basically impossible. Like, as humans, we can empathize even with grossly disfigured people, so having them genuinely be a 1/10 is difficult.
Most attractive people, then, would fall into the 7/8 category. Same with notably unattractive people really being 2/3.
@@scpdatabase69420 why it's so hard to rate your own attractivness then? If it's so obvious
I love that we now agree dehumanising people based on race is cruel and morally repugnant, but we're still thrilled to assign ourselves and others a number grade for our physical attractiveness. The disconnect is just astounding.
Yeah Im astonished at the comments in here. Many people here must be so miserable with themselves...
yoooo new quoves vid
the people getting angry at rating themselves high are interesting to me. even if to you it may not be “correct” it does feel like people get angry at people being happy with themselves and the way they look(yes, being happy with yourself is different to objectively looking attractive to people). although i do agree that people who rate themselves higher without any thought into it are interesting i don’t think it’s reasonable to put them down or say “they look bad” because obviously they do to themselves and is why this is rating themselves. not other people rating them.
Right! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Maybe its because of access
They believe they are a certain number and once someone they believe to be on the same level rates themselves higher
They get angry because they got degraded and cheated of a chance with them.
YES this weird phenomenon where a “ugly” person rate themselves higher on beauty scale and the negative reactions they get is odd. Like so what a “ugly” person think they’re attractive 😭
those people who get mad are so insecure
@@shelby9510none here was ugly tho
They all pick 7/10 because they think it's not too risky but still 2 points above 5. It means that they're afraid to be average. 6 is not far enough from the averageness so they pick the number just above.
It's more like they think 7 is the average. Their scale is just different.
Hi Qoves Studio, I remember you once quoted a study that said people are more honest (realistic) about where they stand on the 1-10 when next to someone who truly has a high sexual market value (SMV).
With that in mind, if you did another video like this, would you consider having the men and women stand next to an actual high SMV model and then ask them to rate themselves? I would be curious to see what people would rate themselves 1-10 while standing next to an actual 8 in looks and body?
And ask them to rate themselves with excluding number 7.
And the high one should come and everybody, without enhancement, no make up, no super styled hair, natural hair, no jewellry, no nice clothes, NO surgery and fillers or whatever, a white or black T-shirt and basic jeans.
Then it would be more accurate.
Everybody in their NATURAL state.
This is how you know if you are naturally beautiful
That's really interesting. Great idea! Although I think if they stood next to a 10/10 model, they might still give themselves a 7 because a 7 is still obviously below the highly attractive person. Maybe put a solid seven next to them?
@@blackananaasok but how do you get rid of your fillers 😂
There was a documentary that did something similar, and what was most shocking is that the women (there were no men in the experiment) just rated the model higher. The researchers' hypothesis (which I agree with) was that rating yourself as a 6~7 is safe. It is above 5 which is average (and no one wants to be average) but not so high like an 8 or 9 which would cause them to face reality in the form of negative criticism from objective observers of their beauty.
Anyway the model used was about a 7.5~8 but because most of the women wanted to label themselves as a 7 they knew standing next to another 7 would instantly make them a lair so they rated the model as a 10... Oh, and the reason I said the model was a 7.5~8 is because of another prior experiment in which they had a few hundred people rate the model from 1-10.
Personally, I thought most of the women fell into the average range 4~5, so I don't know why they were so determined to be 7's.... Seriously! Ask any unfortunate person whose looks rate about 2~3.5, and they would LOVE to be considered at least average (5 out 10) looking.
This would be such a great video
The first girl who rated herself a 5 is better looking than all of the girls who rated themselves 7s and 8s. A lot of delusion going around. It's not self-confidence.
Sometimes delusional people are more confident than others without delusional thinking.
Yeah it’s her posture that’s bad, she’s very beautiful.
Exactly
Nah I think a couple of the ones who rated themselves as 8s really were 8s and she was like a 7 (but an actual 7 lol).
Some of the men here are delusional too 🤷🏻♀️ not just women. Also they asked them to rate themselves they didn’t ask you to rate them 🤷🏻♀️
"not too good not too bad... 8"
being an 8 is basically being essentially perfect wth
No It isnt
8 is model material I’d say but not perfect
No that’s 80% of perfection which is still a long way from perfect considering how really small changes that most people can’t even vocalize have immense implications for perceived attractiveness
@@sashab5809so 30% of the scale used to measure all humanity is reserved for identifying the minute differences in attractiveness between the tiny few hot enough to be models?
@@lilzewhat are you on about mate I had a seizure tryna read that
It's always the people that say "self love is important" and rate themselves a 10 that are the most insecure about their bodies and hate themselves. I don't know why people falsely portray confidence, it's not attractive to be fake or delusional.
Yes!!! I dont get it! I would give myself 2 (maximum) and i look better than some of them. ( I am a woman)
@@5-es4mnI think that’s the other extreme. People who looking alright but rating themselves a 1-3 are trying to fish for compliments or want to get seen as very very humble
why do people always assume that not rating yourself as perfect = low confidence? You can be objective about where you stand and still be confident in yourself. I rate myself based on my dating success. Unless i'm a guy who gets women at the snap of a finger, i'm not a 10/10 lol. Objectively, i'd say i'm a 6/10. Slightly above average.
A 6 is not just slightly above average bro, it’s literally above the average.
Probably they wishful think that overrating themselves will magically increase their attractiveness in the other person's eyes. Never the case though. In fact, if someone who's (for example) a 3-4/10 in my eyes starts acting c0cky, they usually become a 2 or even 1.
@@kiravampira1456 esp if the person feels entitled to people because they think they're this extremely attractive person. Literally delusional. I've dealt with this before where below average to average looking women act like they're 10s and get mad when I reject them lol
@thelonercoder5816 Dealing with the same scenario on a regular basis, only gender-reversed.
Thank you! Besides, being confident when you have nothing to be confident about is silly. If you look like a failed science experiment, stay out of other people’s sight as much as you can and be humble. Contribute to the world using other skills
This was the most scientifically informed roast I've ever seen.
A good scale is whether one kind of fades into the background, or stands out (one way or the other). If you are typically overlooked, then you're around average (4-6). If you really stand out (either really good, or really bad) then you're on the ends of the scale(1-2, 8-10), and if you are sometimes noticed but not enough to really stand out, then you're in the middle (3 or 7).
The better question would be "how do you think others would rate you?" People would be more honest
This is called PHOTOFEELER an app you post a pic vote and get voted on by strangers . This is the best way to get an idea where your attractive level is out of 10.
Sample size matters so at least 100 votes to get a clear idea of your attactive level.
Most of the people in this video are 4-6
Maybe 1 or 2 7's
i think a lot of people perceive the question asked as an overall score of how confident or overall good human being they are, when really the question is isolated to pure physical attraction of a human.
And based purely on physical attactiveness, a lot of these people would be 4/5/6 out of 10 with regards to being judged purely on physical attraction.
Maybe evolutionary it is an advantage to consider oneself more attractive to help with confidence in approaching a mate and finding a partner and ones general contentment with themselves. I dont know, but overall, it was interesting to see that there was a general trend of people thinking they were better looking than they were
No no they perfectly understood the question. They're just delusional because nobody wants to be average.
@@nairdazitro7460that’s what happens when you get told you’re special in school
People think most people are pretty so the average is 7
💯
I rate myself as a 5.5 but I'm probably a 5 somedays and a 6 others.
A young attractive person would rate me lower whereas an old person who was never highly attractive growing up would rate me higher. So it depends who's rating.
My mom rates me as an 8.
I totally agree with you
I agree. I'm a 4 when I wake up, a 5 on average, a 6 if my skin is clear, and a 7 if my skin is clear with makeup
I am officially down the looksmaxing rabbithole
I am ashamed of thinking that I fell that rabbit hole too.
I feel so bad for the people he interviewed for this video. They were just asked to rate themselves and because they rated themselves “too high” the comments take every opportunity to shit on them. If most of the people in these comments were in this video they’d be deemed “ugly” by the comments too.
What's the point of such a video if we can't react to their answers ? Nobody shits on them btw, people are just saying they're delusional.
@@nairdazitro7460 no some of these comments are definitely shitting on these people really harshly
@@BlackCat-qr6gy I have seen none.
@@nairdazitro7460 would you rate yourself a 5 if you were asked on the spot?
@@nairdazitro7460 also there are clearly attractive people being interviewed yet there’s comments saying “everyone is average or below”. imo that’s far too harsh.
Most people here were like 4s and 5s with some 6-6.5s sprinkled in. I think rating on a bell curve is the best way. According to the bell curve, a 7 and above is in the top 2% of looks, so a 7+ is reserved for models. I consider a 6 a good looking/cute person.
Bell curves can be highest at any number including 7. For example most people in the English exam scored a 70% so the bell curve is highest at 70.
Golly, just the fact hat youre talking about a bell curve when it comes to people...
There are people who rate themselves higher and here I am crying everytime im about to go out or see myself in the mirror with body dysmorphia .
Totally agree. I rate myself several points below what other people rate me. I often catch strangers staring at me appreciatively. I think it's cause other ppl have awful taste.
@@user-yb6tk1ru6xSAMEEEEE, literally get told that I could model by both women and men, have been told multiple times in public that I’m “so pretty”, stared at, etc., but I want to throw up every time I see myself 😭😭😭
It's so funny when I compare them to people in my country, in my country everybody thinks that they are ugly, I really love our humble mentality
Where are you from?
@@nicochan1537 Perm, it's a town in Russia
@@gorilla_2282russians are always so negative 😂
makes sense coz there's a whole bunch of super attractive ppl there
Makes sense bc there’s a bunch of depressed people there
I'm a proud 6. But if you call someone a 6 they get offended. But this proves how delulu we are.
@@beowulf_of_wall_st lool women have a problem with reality
Has to do a lot with their insecurity
Sometimes I think I'm cute and sometimes I think I'm ugly so 5 feels about accurate
If that's you in the profile pic, definitely not a 5. ❤
Maybe on a good day!@@malzzzzzzzzzz
@@malzzzzzzzzzzfacts she is attractive
What the person above me said. In terms of face the profile picture is very beautiful. You're a 7 to me. Maybe not to everyone but to me yes
@@Toast2005if that’s you in the profile you’re a 10
Also, you are totally correct about how dating apps are too brutal, because they encourage participants to skip over people who would make good matches.
I have to say I love this channel, I run a model scouting agency in London and you do such fantastic work x
say whatever you want what makes and breaks beauty is your personality. be a kind soul and i find you so much more attractive than ratings ever could!
The dating app thing is SO TRUE. Like omg you KNOW RIGHT AWAY when you see someone in person vs their photos. Also I start to like people the more I get to know them
The point was that familiarity makes people more attractive so it wouldn’t happen right away
Rating System IMO
1-4: Below Average
5: Average
6: Above Average
7: Cute/Handsome
8: Hot
9: Supermodel Territory
10: Perfect w/ Absolutely No Flaws
This
10s don’t exist. Highest should always be a 9. Separate 1-3 with 4. You can be below average but not hard to look at. Some people are legit hideous
In that case everyone below a 3 would have to have moderate to severe deformities
No one has no flaws, for me supermodels should be 10 - we're looking at people who exist, not perfect entities
Level 10 attractiveness does not equal no flaws imo. Perfection is actually less attractive, more of an anomaly or spectacle but not truly attractive, imo.
The problem with this scales is pretty consistent throughout any kind of "ratings"
People tend to utilize barely half of said scale, so in the end we are coming to situation where the real 1 is 5, and 7-8 is like the middle, while anything below 5 just barely exist and almost never used
So, scales just stop making any sense whatsoever
I am a solid 2/10
Yeah, and when you look at the population around 5% of people are below 5/10, around 85% are average so 5 to lets say 7-10, leaving around 10% of being those above average 7+/10s.
@@cheytacpraetoriancomposite3413 the problem again is in perception. People often consider 5 as some kind of line for "less is definitely ugly", when 5 is literally just The Average. 5% you mentioned are not "slightly below average", they are on the lower end of the scale, so we should look at 1-2. Otherwise, again, 1-10 pont scale literally loosing it's meaning, because you use 1-5 scale with added 5 free point for everyone only to project "niceness", "positivity" and be "uplifting"
@@vanderdik7185 Yeah you are correct, I suggested that -5/10 being below average because of social experiments pretty much showing that if you are slightly below average in modern days you are basically fighting for scraps, those 5% and 10% people are the only major difference. The top 10% people are going to be attractive to absolutely everybody and the down 5% are going to be ugly for everybody and not a single person will say otherwise unless they are being dishonest. Those 85% of convencionally attractive people will be the target of preferance. I am in that range altho I have few strong features that stand out from the average and for one women I can be super ugly and for other I am a bedtime material.
Yeah, but physical attraction is to a large degree still subjective so how would anyone know it was accurately used? Unless you ask a specific population of the same culture and age range with the same exposure to similar media, there will never be an objective standard
I like how a lot of people rated themselves in this video. Seeing others being confident makes me happy.
Calling yourself an 8, 8.5, or 10 is crazyyyy. Nobody in this video was above a 7 and most were like a 5 or lower lmao. It's insane that people think "well i put effort into being presentable" or "I'm confident so therefore I'm a 10" lmao like plz be so for reallll
Some people live in delusion
True none were high on the beauty scale. Most were 3 or 4 at best.
There were definitely above averge people here.... I'm too lazy to find the rest buy 6:59 girl was super pretty. 2:32 girl also has a lot of potential like her eyes are pretty and features
you guys are too judgemental 😂 and yall perception of beauty is screwed.
@@victoriancarwash4393 nah you would just rather people lie to you so that your feelings don't get hurt. I'm begging y'all to be realistic. Not everyone needs to be beautiful but calling everyone a 8, 9, or 10/10 is delusional.
as someone who watch beauty pageant since the early 2000s like Miss Universe Pageant..these people wouldn't make it to the top 15 if they join the pageant. i wish i have their confidence...or delusion.
Be honest. They wouldn't even qualify for the pageant.
These pageants are mainly an industry
Sure but arent the padgent queens like a 9.9999
Why so angry
But of you look at old old miss uni you'll soon notice your not even looking at natural faces. There's somuch surgery now.
I think the mere exposure effect is also the reason why some people may grow more comfortable with their looks as they grow older.
Hmm I’m a Slavic woman and retired agency model, I would put myself at 6, especially living in the west. Most of my features are more fitting to East Asian beauty standards and I think location and culture really plays a big role in our attractive perception. Also,Regardless of where you rate yourself you can still put 10/10 effort and time into looking and preserving your beauty so you feel confident!
Kudos to the ⅓ of participants being accurate and sincere.
The woman in the icon with the green dress was nail on the head without sounding arrogant.
The guy who rated himself as 2/10 seemed more a matter of honest but skewed perception due to a lack of confidence, rather than false modesty. He was better looking than he realised.
I was surprised by this video, i thought a lot more people would have been more comfortable being honest. I also thought there'd by more false modesty.
I would rate myself at 6 on a good day, and 4 on a bad day. What i have in a face and shape, i lose in short stature and pale complexion
also can someone explain this to me:
in this video he talks about individuals rating themselves higher because we see our faces everyday and that familiarity makes us perceive ourselves to be more attractive BUT have you every taken a selfie you thought you looked nice but the longer you stare at that it, the uglier and weirder you think you look??!!
I think the rating yourself from 1-10 scale is more for fun than anything. I see myself as about a 6 out of 10, a little bit above average but nothing out of the ordinary. Sundays when I don't really go out and haven't done my makeup much or focused too much on making my hair look nice, I'm about a 5. When going out on a date with my boyfriend, trying to look my best, I'm a 6.5. My boyfriend though for some reason thinks I'm a 10/10, which is really sweet (maybe he's just saying that).
9:37 bro showed my face as an example of unattractiveness 💀
Felt that
I have to wonder if people consider a 7/10 to be "average" because the U.S. grading standards for schools places 70%-79%, a "C," as average. And 50%-59% is an "F", or "fail"/"flunk."
yeah but these are British people... 7/10 isn't average in our grading
@zara1559 I understand the differences in the grading systems, and I'd say the American one is inferior for sure. I could be wrong, but would you agree that Americans lean on the 1-10 looks scale more than in any other region? If British people (or anyone else) are picking up on certain trends from Americans, like the 1-10 scale, I wonder if British people would adopt the same attitudes even though they would be lifted from the American grading system. But it could also be the case that people are just rating themselves favorably. I would never rate myself because I feel I'd be too much in my head worried about over/under-rating myself to be objective.
A c is below average in almost every American school. A B is considered average
@@bradentrice6615 C is considered satisfactory or good enough. The average grades are higher because of the competitive nature. If you get all Cs the chances you are going to higher education or whatever job opportunities is lower.
love you guys of this channel.
i refused for long to watch these videos of you with opinions of other people because in majority is useless.
but you didn't make just another of these videos that just show the opinions, you showed the data and reality behind. and that's the useful thing.
love you.
The problem is the scale is subjective. I see 10 as perfect, 9-7 as very good looking 5 - not great not terrible 4-3 unattractive 2-1 really unattractive. Lots of ppl in the comment section seems to think the scale should be according to the normal curve of distribution. So what could be a 5 in their scale, meaning “avarage”, would be 7 in my scale, as avarage people around me are still pretty good looking. You should define the question better.
can you rate me? 😭 I need an honest rating from a stranger, but like don’t rate me low just because of my ethnicity/ethnic features please
@@aquariusbabe I can, but I dont see you, So :D
None are edited, the lighting/coloring (like highlights) is a little but features, face, all natural, only makeup is really my eyebrows and a tiny bit of mascara.
Something tells me that the people that always think theyre a 10 are the most insecure.
Long story short:
* People broadly agree on who is attractive and who is not, but when it comes to you: 7 is the magic number. Most people rate themselves 7 out of 10, and also consider it to be the threshold for dating.
* Implication is: less attractive people see themselves as more attractive, and more attractive people see themselves as less attractive. "Just above average" attractive people are aligned with external perception.
* Most people over-rate themselves possibly because of 1/ exposure effect (the more you see sb, the more you like it), 2/ self-deception for confidence boost (which leads to more romantic success), 3/ focusing on different traits to judge oneself vs. others.
* We prefer to be judged on our looks by strangers than our peers. It is less threatening.
* Beyond looks, confidence and good personality are seen as attractive. And over-confident people have a competitive advantage.
Cheers.
nice to see a video like this from an educational channel
Don't take this channel too seriously. If it was a true educational channel they would have some sort of oversight by an authority be it a University or some other Institution. But as it currently stands they can basically upload anything, make it look objective and true when in reality there are possibly many biases involved. Most of their videos are pretty good but there are some where opinions definetly diverge. Point is don't believe everything at a whim. Especially for something which can be as subjective as beauty. They themselves said they changed their opinions over time how much is subjective and how much is objective. Just be critical.
Such an interesting concept and in the end all I see is how funny people being overconfident is
"I'm pretty average so I'm a 7 or 8".......... Wuuut... Seems we have a problem with math in the public school system.
If i ever get an 8 online i will not take it seriously like how is eight average....
??? Math has little do do with this. If their perception is that an average person is pretty then that’s their truth. That’s like saying that on the Richter scale, the average earthquake HAS to be a 5.0. No concept of statistics at all!
@@andy2641What's the point of rating people on a scale of 1 - 10 then, if everyone have their own scales? The number you say doesn't really mean anything either way.
@@amirtorhan2762 It's not that serious. I'm often asked stuff like "what did you think about this movie on a scale of 1-10?" or "how much do you like this food on a scale of 1-10?". I also come across rating sites for movies and music like letterboxd and rateyourmusic. These scales are to assess how much a person likes something. Attractiveness is subjective, so you cannot create a universal standard scale for it. I assume the scale you are thinking of is a scale of fitting to societal beauty standards.
@@andy2641 You have no clue what you are talking about. Of course attractiveness is subjective but that has nothing to do with it.
When someone asks you to rate someone from 1-10, you are supposed to give them a number from 1 to 10 where the average person will be a 5. But due to most people being people-pleasers and also seem to lack understanding of the entire concept. The majority of people will rate with extreme biases, where most people will be 7s or even 8s. This is foolishness and completely illogical, and no it doesn't mean that they think the "average person is pretty". It means that the average is 7-8 instead which doesn't make any sense. This kills the entire idea of the scale because it will be completely distorted and it means the actual attractive people (those who are real 8s or 9s) will barely be differentiated by the average and slightly above average because there is no room in the scale.
You bringing up other scales like Richter scale which is a completely different thing just shows your lack of knowledge. FYI Richter scale is not even a linear scale, it's a logarithmic scale which also doesn't have any limits.
OK but did yall see the cute chunky dog close to the end. It's so cute omg, I just want to hug it🤗
Interestingly I found Tamiranashe at 7:48 who rated herself a 6 to be one of the more attractive women in this. Maybe because i find the delusional overconfidence in your own attractiveness in itself very unattractive. She just had a more positive aura about her than most women rating themselves high.
6 is still overconfidence
@@tomfooIeryz nah i’d say she’s spot on at 6/10
I feel attractiveness is subjective, and so much influences how we see/rate others and ourselves. One person in a line up could see someone as a 8 because they think they're very attractive, or it is there preference, while another person in the same line up could see someone as a 4. They have different preferences and ideas of what's attractive.
There some common things that are attractive and things that are not most people are average or below average 4s and 5 where the more attractive people are 6s 7s with few 8s eight is less the 1% of the world and tens is not something you will see for very long because it basically perfect and can’t be or stay perfect
Wrong going from an 8 to a 4 is impossible to rate that far down.
Maybe an 8 to 6 never a 4
I just can't gauge attractiveness from photographs, I need to know how people speak, move, sound, and smell.
6:57 tf kinda reasoning is that? "i think life's too short, so i hereby declare i am the smartest human being who ever grazed this planet"
idk i felt her
@@МишкаМолочко good for u
I mean objectively speaking she is a 10, so she's correct lmao
@@MultiSciGeek she isnt
@@MultiSciGeekYou have low physical standards if you think that woman is a 10.
Think about it for a moment. If she is a 10, then what is Megan Fox in her prime? Or Heidi Klum? Or Angelina Jolie?
Its not that deep, most people think average is 7, and 5 is below average and anything below 5 being repulsive.
Most these people are okay looking, and they think theyre okay looking. All these people in the comments usually without profile pics foaming at the mouth in rage is just laughable.
So they love themselves, Jung said the things that make people angry are usually also ditected towards themselves, so maybe u guys should learn to love yourself
Agreed. I'm starting to extremely dislike this channel and its community for its pretentious attitude about this. Most people simply see 7 as the average, so they're likely to rate themselves as that. Plain and simple. It doesn't mean they think they're above average. It doesn't mean they think they're extremely good-looking. Their scale is just different.
Imagine thinking 7 is average. 7 is literally the start of "pretty".
@@chillblue1650 With the millions of unique people on this planet, the obsession of beauty and the very narrow parameters placed on it is unfortunate. I feel for the younger generation who are exposed to so many videos centered on beauty and altering appearance. Besides TV and magazines, I had little of it growing up. The only people I have ever considered "ugly" have been cruel, mean, or perverted. There is a strong association for me with attractiveness and personality.
@@LoveAfterPookie No, 7 is above average beauty. 5.5 is average, 6 is pretty, pleasant, 7 is gorgeous anything 8-10 is rare.
Nah people just don’t want to admit that they are inferior. I like to think I’m smarter than average even though I’m probably normal intelligence.
People who rate themselves 7 do it because of self-preservation rather than because it’s the objective truth
It’s also important to note the grading system here 7=70=C grade. These people are actually calling their looks equivalent to a passing C grade and y’all think they’re egotistical.
Yeah a bunch of incels using their ridiculous scale who want everyone to be as miserable as them. They literally tell people to give up because of the angle their eyes tilt lmao. And they think other people are delusional.
70's marks are not C, They are B. 60's are C.
@@princessazula624Where I live 70's are C's. It might be different than where you live.
@@princessazula624 That's a new invention. 70% is a C- to the adult commentors...
@@videofan1010 but the point remains the same, with grading in mind these people are are actually being humble. But our host thought that they were being egotistical.
In society beauty is tied to value. People may feel they dont value themselves if they rate themselves low
way too many 4-5s rating themselves as 7 here.
That redhead was like a 2.5 and she rated herself a 7 lol 😂
There are some terrible people in these comments
@@EmalineStannphill-u6h dont worry its what everyone thinks in person, just doesnt want to say it to your face. There's no hope for "well maybe if im confident!" You are bang average
Okay Ronaldo fan that’s enough internet go pick up a hobby instead of watching sports and brainrot.
@@EmalineStannphill-u6h not really, just honesty. It's better to be honest than lie because the person is going to find out anyways that they're ugly
I feel like the comment section is jealous about the inner confidence of some of the participants. Inner confidence comes from the deepest Essence of a person. You prefer seeing someone with low self-esteem crying in order to feel good abt yourselves ( like am not the only one who think that i look like peace of shit) . Trust me no one is ugly it just so weired to see Humans calling other humans ugly .you know humans are not objects to rates. Don't let people take the inner light from you . Accept and love how God designed you . People's opinions don't matter.they are not you. The comment section shows how superficial most people are .
Its crazy, not a single person who said 7 is even close, especially the women. They were all 3-5. I think rating yourself is a perfect summary of your personality
Please make a video about the width of the nose and the tip of the nose, and how it affects the beauty of women. For example, if a woman has an unusually wide nose for her ethnic group
Are those confident people really just lying to themselves? Even at my best I never would have rated myself so high. What is it like to live without insecurities!! A dream!!
My bet is they are thinking about numbers the way grades are structured. So 6 is barely passing and 7 is average.
This is like asking someone how much they make. And instead of saying how much they make, they say how much they WANT to make.
Wow people really overrate themselves I guess
"life's too short, so 10" i loved that girl
if you take the same interview with the people of south asian countries, i believe majority of them would rate themselves quite lower in compared to them. It again comes down to childhood and how you were raised. Most asian people are raised with strict parents and with less validations. For instance the parents kind of force their childs to achieve the perfect grades on everything. That's why asian people are never quite comfortable with their self worth. Always in the competition of acheiving that perfect position. Thats why have less self-esteem and arrogance in compared to people of the west like we can see in the video.
Yes westerners are born with mental illness
People foaming at the mouth in the comments cause people don’t rate themselves 3’s. You will live 💀
Exactly! 😅
LMAOOO exactly what i was thinking
@@aayushimajumdereng1615 Same
😂😂😂😂 this comment took me out. I think it's the audacity. like "😊 how dare you rate yourself high , don't you know you are ugly" 😂
It's more annoying when most of the girls there that are like 5 or 6 rate themselves 8+ as if they shouldn't be dating avg guys.
Former teenage model and now plastic surgeon here. (I modeled for Abercrombie and Fitch and Hollister, I am a man).
When people ask me what I’d rather myself, I give myself a 6.5 or so because someone who is a 7-8 is exceptionally attractive and a 9-10 is ultra rare throughout history.
I get the most ridiculous comments “who hurt you,” “where’s your confidence?”
Extremely annoying that these people do this.
Contrary to what's mentioned at 4:49, I actually find myself less attractive the more I see myself in the mirror
Hi QOVES! Please start citing your sources, it would be much appreciated :)
The problem is not that people overrate themselfs, its the 10 rating itself.
What is a 1, what is a 10.
Is 5 absolute average?
Is a mega super model a 10? Or do we consider them above that because nobody looks like that?
The rating is not able to be represantive of a real beauty standard, it discribes only how well people feel in their body.
I hate this comment section, so many people bashing others for their looks and talking about being „objective“
The girl at 0:57 in my opinion doesn't look good in that shot, but i think she definitely has the potential. If she had put on colorful clothes, sat up straight and put her hair different she would probably already look a lot better (in my opinion).
Key words are : in my opinion. Thank you. This is the point we all need to get at the end of this video. 😊
This subject is really interesting because it brings in other topics that can be related to it suck as
If you rate yourself higher than average some would judge you or call you selfish or too confident or arrogant.
And the people that rate themselves lower would be seen as not confident or shy or "a pick me"
So the whole thing comes down to how you see yourself and how others see you and that can be poisoning
As it can either make you too aware or careless and other people's opinions matter to almost everyone even if they say they don't care what others say.
So in short this topic is very wide as it can be seen both positively and negatively and no matter what not everyone can come to an agreement on it in a lot of points
Great video it's really interesting seeing how people view themselves and view others in their life.
love these new kind of video where you apply theory to real life
C'mon man, Isabella is stone cold 10! She's got a nice smile, seems bery sweet and has TWO big reasons to catch any guys attention!😂
she is absolutely beautiful in my opinion, even up to the way she carried herself. not sure why it was hardly said here. i wonder how successful women like her (who are gorgeous, but ethnic) are at dating in the western world.
Do you agree with me? Normal distribution meaning 68.2% would be 4,5 or 6.
Sinead - 4
Oliwia - 4
Dan - 5
Ashritha - 3
Haydon - 5
Rebecca - 4
Corin - 6
Caeleigh - 4
Jaiten - 4
Isabella - 6
Ananya - 5
Joana - 5
Talia - 5
Shriya - 6
Leonard - 5
Emily - 5
Juliana - 3
Imran - 6
Simeon - 4
Tamiranashe - 4
Elysia - 5
Godwin - 5
Vinisha - 6
Gargi - 4
Samuel James - 7
Haydon - 5
Monalisa - 5
Elcy - 4
Sernila - 4
Joseph - 2
I am aware that 5/30 are not 4,5 or 6 which means that I only have 13.3% of this sample size which are more than one standard deviation apart from the mean. For a bigger sample size it should be 31.8%. Please let me know what you think :)
Very interesting!! I would differ and give, Sinead-3, Corin-4, Caeleigh- 3, Emily-3 and agree with Samuel James being a 7!
Agree with pretty much all the ratings. Which male celebrity would you rate an 8 and a 9?
I saw a couple of 2s on there, like the spectacled bald white guy and the obese brown girl with a moon face right after him.
@@kiuk_kiksmoon face💀
Bruh there is no objective standard, but yeah the majority of people naturally will fit the 4-6 range. But that is generally speaking, someone's 6 is another person's 7. Someone's 5 is another person's 3
One thing for sure they all need to change to gain that 2 extra point is IMPROVING THEIR POSTURE,
I think people are forgetting what actual “confidence” is. Confidence should be the absolute belief in something that is actually true. If you’re ugly but confident, that doesn’t mean you lie to yourself and tell yourself you’re beautiful. It means you know you’re ugly but you’re perfectly fine with it and it doesn’t bother you or matter to you in the slightest. And I think THAT is actually 100000% more attractive than being delusional.
I'd be interested to know if dating success is impacted by A. One's rating of oneself and B. The closesness of that rating to the rating given to them by third parties on average.
eg take two fives, one who considers themselves an 8 and one who considers themselves a 5. Is it the overconfident one or the realistic one who is more likely to end up in a relationship?
It's mainly impacted by others' opinion.