Too funny that is the first thing I noticed with some confusion! Great video. Love those explorers. I have been looking at the MK2 a bit but was confused they would put what seems to be too small a band on that wide of a watch. The Explorer 40 looks perfect. How to get one is the question. I have an Explorer 114270 with the rehault and simply marvel at its beauty. Keep the videos coming!
I absolutely love this video, seeing both watches in different settings and light conditions, it really shows the watches in the wild… all the subtle differences that us watch nerds appreciate…Fantastic work!, Great editing the whole thing flows, your VoiceOver is perfect. Great work 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼.. your hard work is appreciated!… Your fan from London…❤
I got the call today for one after waiting a couple of months , and It’s just not the right time at the moment for me . I bought a IWC Mk XX in April and I’m happy with it. The perfect time to buy for me would be nearer the end of the year. I’ve tried the 40 on and I love it.
Thanks for the video! Very informative and great comparison! I do think that the 36 looks way better on your wrist, less beefy - as the explorer 1 should look.
Great review; I've just subscribed & liked. Love how you incorporated a dramatic, aerial oceanfront walk into the vlog. Real world watch wearing!! I previously owned a 39mm Exp Mk1. Kept it for 8 yrs, but finally moved it due to the short hands. I really like the new 40mm model! Hope to get one this year or next.
I agree with you, if the new 36 were actually a 36 it'd be in my collection. That being said the Mark 2 is one of my favorites ever but the proportions of the 40 push it over the edge for my eyes. I just wish the endlinks didn't stick out quite as far but I'm patiently waiting for one!
Excellent video of one of the best watches of all time. I've had the mk1, mk2, new 36 steel, new 36 two tone and now I don't have an Explorer in the collection. I think I'm with you in that if the new steel one was a true 36 or even 36.5 it would be perfection, but instead it's really a 35.5! I think the one to go for is the mk2! The new 40 has a surprisingly long lug to lug. Plus the prices are coming back to earth on the mk2's, so that's likely the one I'll go for. Also, I'll add, this is a conversation only watch guys would love. To everyone else they are all the same watch!
Loads of people loved the original 36 and were upset when it went to 39. loads of people also loved the 39 so having 36 and 40 keeps both camps happy , apart from rolex cant measure size properly.
Whomen runined the mens size by stealing form us. Feminism caused this mess. Personally if a woman wears a mans watch men should avoid her, unless that man likes men too. I wear the 34mm and 36mm proudly.
Another thing to mention is the lugs and bracelet interaction. The 40mm model does this well as the lugs line up with the link. While the 39 has a bit of an overhang from the lugs.
It's interesting that by just looking at these 2 watches side by side, I feel like the new 40 is actually smaller than the 39 one, and slimmer. Maybe due to the glossy dial compared to the matt dial, or due to the wider lug width and bigger crown, to make the dial looks smaller.
Thank you for comparing both. I really like the look of the new 40 with the gloss dial. I'll have to try it at the AD and hopefully get one, heard this model is not super popular so might have a chance.
While owning several Rolex models over the past 5 decades, The Explorer is the coolest and I have gravitated to only wearing the standard Oyster case models. My son and I currently have 2 39mm Mk-2, and he also has the 2021 36mm Explorer. I have 8" wrists and automatically thought I'd buy the 40mm also..... But now I may not and simply keep both 39's in the stable. Great review and much appreciated, thank you!
The lug-to-lug length is so important - more so that the 39MM to 40MM increase, because those fixed end-links translate to a 2MM increase across the wrist.
That’s cool about the new Tudors. They have negative / female solid end links, so the bracelet can drop straight down and wears smaller than the rolex ones.
I actually like the 124270 on you. But the 40 def makes it look sportier! Now I wish I had a 40 too for a diff look alongside my 124270 hah. Same wrist size.
Rolex’s decisions are pretty hard to figure out sometimes. The MK2 was absolutely perfect. They should have just updated the movement and been done with it.
@@ScaredCops going from matte to glossy black dial is a significant change. The lug to lug is also significantly longer, making the watch wear even bigger. The case is thicker and the bracelet and clasp are wider. These are all very noticeable changes that affect the wearability and overall esthetics of the watch. The only real upgrades are the longer power reserve and AR coating.
The 40 has weird proportions now because of the increase in lug width and lug to lug dimensions. Glad i found a used MKII in perfect condition…just paid more in this market than would have liked.
My main AD rep said that a lot of guys that come in won't even consider a watch with a diameter that starts with a 3. That's not me, but I've never found a 36 I liked on wrist, but plenty of 38 or 39mm watches are great. When I tried on the exhibition 40, that particular sales person said the 36mm Explorer sold more to women, which I found interesting. The new 40 wears great on my 7.25" wrist, but I do wish they would go away from the male end links. It would definitely fit a lot more wrists without that, though conversely somebody that's maybe got a large wrist and is used to bigger watches might consider a 40mm Explorer because of that.
The 39 is more elegant than the 40 i tried.. The 39 wears really well with a grey suit or tux. A great dress watch. I find my Rootbeer to be more versatile believe it or not.
The reason Rolex made the change will have been that the new Explorer 36 (which is 35.5mm and has a slimmer bracelet than the OP36) is now more geared towards women - hence the two tone option, and the 40mm is now the size of other Professional models like the AirKing and Milgauss. If it was a real 36mm I would want that size, history and all that. However the OP for men used to be 34mm.
Biggest difference I see is the AR coating on the 40mm. You don't mention it at all but seeing them next to each other in the light is wild. I never really knew it made such a dramatic difference. I'd still go for the 39mm, though. Just a better fit for me.
After a long back and forth between 36 and 39, I decided on the 36mm 114270 and got it 1 month before the new 36mm was released. Considering that the new one was almost the same, yet “better” in many ways (and cheaper at retail) I ordered the new one as welland have since got it. I know own both of the 36mm and whilst I really want to believe that the new one is better and prefer the better lume, the lumed digits, the anti reflectant coating on the crystal and the sturdier bracelet, I still haven’t sold the old one, because I just dont like the 19 to 14mm bracelet and Might eventually sell it and keep the old one… or use it as a beater and use the old one every now and then.
Nice review. I sold my Mk2 as it always felt a little small my wrist. The new 40 is probably perfect for me, but don’t know if I’ll ever get lucky enough to get one again.
The size difference between the 39 & 40 is hardly noticeable. In reality it’s a fraction of a mm. And if anything, the 40 looks smaller (less wide) in the flesh. In any case, good luck in acquiring one 👍🏻
Not sure about your L2L measurement, I own a 40mm Explorer and L2L from end to end of the case is less than 47mm ( less than Sub 40 and Sub 41 ), I think you are adding the center link as well. The same L2L is over 47mm on Exp-39 thats why to me new model wears a bit smaller.
Hmmm 39mm has a smaller and potentially more elegant crown. I would not be disappointed with the 40mm, but i do prefer the 39mm, especially as its thinner as well.
I believe that Rolex bringing back the 36 was a boardroom-driven response to the loss of purists, the exceptionally smaller-wristed, and the unisex watch-wearing crowd, when Rolex rather suprisingly discontinued the 36 in favour of the notably larger 39 around the year 2010. Frankly, it would have made more sense to expand the appeal of the Explorer line by updating but keeping the 36 alongside the 39, so folks would at least have an option. Rolex then coming out with the 40mm Explorer to replace the 39, I think, was its nod to further 'modernizing' the Explorer in keeping with the brand's move in recent years to upsize its Datejust and sport model cases, in order to stay competitive. All of this is of course speculation, but I find it difficult to explain in other terms.
I ve also similar wrist with 6.5 inch wrist. I m also hesitant about size of new exp 40mm (51mm incl. end link) on the other hand, proportions of 39mm also doesnt look right to me. Currently I ve IWC Mark XX on bracelet. I m considering to trade it with rolex exp 1
I tried one on @ my AD & compared it to my 39 . As you mentioned the glossy dial & the Explorer printing at the upper position looks not appealing to me … too shiny ✨ Anyway, I told them that I am interested in buying one . We will see . Luckily they had one BB 41 master chrono available with the jubilee bracelet and so bought that watch 😅
I had a 214270. Even though it was small on my 8.2" wrist, it still didn't look right in terms of the case/bracelet proportions. It looked "bulbous." The 224270 looks to be more integrated between the head of the watch and the bracelet. I believe that this watch is slightly thicker due to the new movement. And yes, I'm on a waitlist. In terms of values for the 214270, they went from just under 7K to nearly 11K and are now trending below 9K. Time will tell. Pun intended.
I have a 6.5" wrist as well. The new 36 feels just a bit too small, and the 40 feels just a bit too big. I have a 41 mm submariner and it looks good on my wrist, but I feel that the 40 mm explorer is just a bit too big. I wanted to buy a new explorer from my AD, but I might have to look for a 214270 instead, or the 114270, which is actually 36 mm with 20 mm lug width.
Nice comparison video. I had the MK2 for some time and for some unknown reason, I saw it unbalanced in terms of proportions. In this case, I have to disagree with you and say that I like the new Explorer 40mm better. Still, I wouldn't buy it again.
Hey man I have a question. I own the 124270 and am disappointed by it. In fact, I am thinking of selling it which really disappoints me. For me, the lack of lume on the 124270 is frustrating and it is not as legible as I had hoped. Does the 224270 have more Lume and is more legible then the 124270?
I prefer the EXPLORER wording position on the Mk2 as the dial layout seems more balanced. The text layout on the new 40mm Explorer seems top heavy 🤔 (IMHO).
Where do you rank the Exp1 in comparison to your other Rolex watches? Experienced collectors love the Exp but whenever I try it on it seems a bit plain and basic.
I personally own the MK2 Explorer and the 41mm submariner. If I had to choose between the two, I’d definitely take the Explorer all day long over the submariner. I’ve owned a good number of watches, and the Explorer is hands down my favorite one out of them all.
@@whereRbearsTeeth That's funny I'm waiting on a Sub Date and I find that to be my must have Rolex. I think it's a watch you probably have to own and wear to appreciate over time. My Hamilton Khaki is as basic as they come but I love the subtle details.
@@watchyourstyle Ah, OK. I tried the 40mm Explorer on two weeks ago, and I liked it all but that wide bezel, which is similar on the DJ 41, which is my main issue with the DJ as well. Something about that wider bezel puts me off. Oh well...
just traded the 39mm for a 114270. the 39mm is a better watch specs wise and no doubt the bracelet and clasp are better but 114270 looks so much better on my 7 inch wrist. I like 39mm/40mm watches but just didn't feel the explorer worked on the larger size
Wow, that’s a rare swap! I’ve been lusting after the 114270, the only thing that’s kept me from getting one is the lack of lumed arabics. But otherwise a near perfect watch!
changed my mind at last minute!i stand by the older 36mm is perfect in size but it just felt a bad trade long term and the lume, bracelet and clasp made me think twice about doing the deal. I think it's reading too many negatives on forums influencer me as if id never read them it felt like the perfect watch 😂
The “36” mm is only 35.3mm in reality. It looks ridiculous on most men’s wrist. Not to mention that the proportions are completely off on the new 36. The older 114270 looks much better. The 39 MK2 remains the overall best Explorer.
Too bad we can't find them anywhere in the US without going through a bunch of AD horse shit. Was in Switzerland 3 weeks ago and saw two of them new there but was an idiot and didn't buy one while there because I"m already on the list here. Now my AD is saying instead of 3 mos (Been on the list 4mos) That they don't know because they've only received one so far. So stupid. I'm about over these ridiculous games.
![[4K] Rolex Explorer 39 vs Explorer 40 Hands-on; Differences Beyond The Obvious | Hafiz J Mehmood](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Nf7Zfi8nuMQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![[4K] Rolex Explorer 39 vs Explorer 40 Hands-on; Differences Beyond The Obvious | Hafiz J Mehmood](/img/tr.png)
![ความรักของยักษ์เขียว (ทศกัณฐ์) - เดี่ยว ไออุ่น [OFFICIAL MUSICVIDEO 4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yCCy-QVHqK8/mqdefault.jpg)
0:22 😅 exp40 is on the left, mk2 on the right. My b! That’s how similar they are 😂
Too funny that is the first thing I noticed with some confusion! Great video. Love those explorers. I have been looking at the MK2 a bit but was confused they would put what seems to be too small a band on that wide of a watch. The Explorer 40 looks perfect. How to get one is the question. I have an Explorer 114270 with the rehault and simply marvel at its beauty. Keep the videos coming!
The new internal AR coating alone makes it look so much better in so many lighting conditions. Picking my 40mm up today!!
Picked up my 40mm 1 week ago from AD. My first Rolex. Beautiful piece that you can wear anywhere.
I absolutely love this video, seeing both watches in different settings and light conditions, it really shows the watches in the wild… all the subtle differences that us watch nerds appreciate…Fantastic work!, Great editing the whole thing flows, your VoiceOver is perfect. Great work 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼.. your hard work is appreciated!… Your fan from London…❤
Glad you enjoyed it Dean! All the best
Excellent comparison video. Going to pick up my 40mm on Fri!
Got the 40 mm a few days ago from my AD. It felt like an old pal within an hour. Flies under the radar, wear it anywhere...
Thank you for the great comparison between these 2 watches 👌
My pleasure! thanks so much for the kind words
Finally! Great video and comparison.
Glad you liked it! I appreciate the support
Rolex explorer 39mm ❤
Thanks WYS, good summation.
Very welcome. I appreciate the support
I got the call today for one after waiting a couple of months , and It’s just not the right time at the moment for me . I bought a IWC Mk XX in April and I’m happy with it. The perfect time to buy for me would be nearer the end of the year. I’ve tried the 40 on and I love it.
Thanks for the video, both are pretty close indeed.
Thanks for the video! Very informative and great comparison! I do think that the 36 looks way better on your wrist, less beefy - as the explorer 1 should look.
Great review; I've just subscribed & liked. Love how you incorporated a dramatic, aerial oceanfront walk into the vlog. Real world watch wearing!! I previously owned a 39mm Exp Mk1. Kept it for 8 yrs, but finally moved it due to the short hands. I really like the new 40mm model! Hope to get one this year or next.
Much appreciated! Thanks for the support
I agree with you, if the new 36 were actually a 36 it'd be in my collection. That being said the Mark 2 is one of my favorites ever but the proportions of the 40 push it over the edge for my eyes. I just wish the endlinks didn't stick out quite as far but I'm patiently waiting for one!
For me the best is also the 39 mk2, i own it and it is my favorite watch!
Very good comparison!! Love it
Congratulations for the watch!
Thanks a lot! I appreciate it
Love your content bro!
Thanks so much for the support!
Excellent video of one of the best watches of all time. I've had the mk1, mk2, new 36 steel, new 36 two tone and now I don't have an Explorer in the collection. I think I'm with you in that if the new steel one was a true 36 or even 36.5 it would be perfection, but instead it's really a 35.5! I think the one to go for is the mk2! The new 40 has a surprisingly long lug to lug. Plus the prices are coming back to earth on the mk2's, so that's likely the one I'll go for. Also, I'll add, this is a conversation only watch guys would love. To everyone else they are all the same watch!
great review
As mk2 owner, can’t be happier with it
Loads of people loved the original 36 and were upset when it went to 39. loads of people also loved the 39 so having 36 and 40 keeps both camps happy , apart from rolex cant measure size properly.
Whomen runined the mens size by stealing form us. Feminism caused this mess. Personally if a woman wears a mans watch men should avoid her, unless that man likes men too. I wear the 34mm and 36mm proudly.
@@user-yy9lg6gs4h whut??? haha you're funny dude.
Another thing to mention is the lugs and bracelet interaction. The 40mm model does this well as the lugs line up with the link. While the 39 has a bit of an overhang from the lugs.
Both are just as good…good in different ways
Awesome review! Can you tell me which model is in the left side of your watch box? It looks very cool!
It's interesting that by just looking at these 2 watches side by side, I feel like the new 40 is actually smaller than the 39 one, and slimmer. Maybe due to the glossy dial compared to the matt dial, or due to the wider lug width and bigger crown, to make the dial looks smaller.
Thank you for comparing both. I really like the look of the new 40 with the gloss dial. I'll have to try it at the AD and hopefully get one, heard this model is not super popular so might have a chance.
Thanks for the support! And good luck 🍀
Great comparison ....
I appreciate it so much!
While owning several Rolex models over the past 5 decades, The Explorer is the coolest and I have gravitated to only wearing the standard Oyster case models.
My son and I currently have 2 39mm Mk-2, and he also has the 2021 36mm Explorer.
I have 8" wrists and automatically thought I'd buy the 40mm also.....
But now I may not and simply keep both 39's in the stable.
Great review and much appreciated, thank you!
do you think exp40 doesn't look too small on a lean (not round) 8"wrist?
They’re both beautiful. I like the smaller one.
The lug-to-lug length is so important - more so that the 39MM to 40MM increase, because those fixed end-links translate to a 2MM increase across the wrist.
That’s cool about the new Tudors. They have negative / female solid end links, so the bracelet can drop straight down and wears smaller than the rolex ones.
I like the 40mm with new movment 70H
plus all other improvments over older model
just got the call for my 36mm, scheduled the pick-up on my birthday, it's truly like being a kid waiting for Christmas...
Happy birthday! And congrats on the new watch
Now my bad, I just checked and my 114270 indeed does not have lume at 3,6,9. But everywhere else. You clearly are the expert.
I actually like the 124270 on you. But the 40 def makes it look sportier! Now I wish I had a 40 too for a diff look alongside my 124270 hah. Same wrist size.
Rolex’s decisions are pretty hard to figure out sometimes. The MK2 was absolutely perfect. They should have just updated the movement and been done with it.
They kinda did
@@ScaredCops not really
@@whereRbearsTeeth still a 39, so…
They did change the dial slightly, widened the bracelets. Nothing major.
@@ScaredCops going from matte to glossy black dial is a significant change. The lug to lug is also significantly longer, making the watch wear even bigger. The case is thicker and the bracelet and clasp are wider. These are all very noticeable changes that affect the wearability and overall esthetics of the watch. The only real upgrades are the longer power reserve and AR coating.
The 40 has weird proportions now because of the increase in lug width and lug to lug dimensions. Glad i found a used MKII in perfect condition…just paid more in this market than would have liked.
You can still get the 36.
Also, does wearing your watch on the bone not hurt?! Thanks for the comp vid!
My main AD rep said that a lot of guys that come in won't even consider a watch with a diameter that starts with a 3. That's not me, but I've never found a 36 I liked on wrist, but plenty of 38 or 39mm watches are great. When I tried on the exhibition 40, that particular sales person said the 36mm Explorer sold more to women, which I found interesting. The new 40 wears great on my 7.25" wrist, but I do wish they would go away from the male end links. It would definitely fit a lot more wrists without that, though conversely somebody that's maybe got a large wrist and is used to bigger watches might consider a 40mm Explorer because of that.
The 39 is more elegant than the 40 i tried.. The 39 wears really well with a grey suit or tux. A great dress watch. I find my Rootbeer to be more versatile believe it or not.
Like he said. The MK2 of Just about every product is the sweet spot. No different here. Agree on the fit it’s like a tailored suit
Is that a white dial on the Rolex OP? Great video, thank you!
Thanks so much! Yep that’s a white dial
Op36 (previous gen)
The reason Rolex made the change will have been that the new Explorer 36 (which is 35.5mm and has a slimmer bracelet than the OP36) is now more geared towards women - hence the two tone option, and the 40mm is now the size of other Professional models like the AirKing and Milgauss. If it was a real 36mm I would want that size, history and all that. However the OP for men used to be 34mm.
5 months later what’s the verdict? Still loving the 40M? I’m considering after I got my sub.
Biggest difference I see is the AR coating on the 40mm. You don't mention it at all but seeing them next to each other in the light is wild. I never really knew it made such a dramatic difference. I'd still go for the 39mm, though. Just a better fit for me.
Yes, that’s a great point! I meant to mention it but forgot. Makes a huge difference in legibility
Nice review, very needed 👍🏽. Rolex makes decisions years before they release pieces, imo they should’ve had 36mm , 39mm and 41mm for us larger gents.
The new 40 is just the 39 with the new movement. Going all out to a 41 would be a wild move, but I’d buy one!
@@ScaredCops you are f’ing clueless lol
Should have stuck with 36😅
After a long back and forth between 36 and 39, I decided on the 36mm 114270 and got it 1 month before the new 36mm was released. Considering that the new one was almost the same, yet “better” in many ways (and cheaper at retail) I ordered the new one as welland have since got it. I know own both of the 36mm and whilst I really want to believe that the new one is better and prefer the better lume, the lumed digits, the anti reflectant coating on the crystal and the sturdier bracelet, I still haven’t sold the old one, because I just dont like the 19 to 14mm bracelet and Might eventually sell it and keep the old one… or use it as a beater and use the old one every now and then.
the 114270 is god tier! Congrats on picking one up
What is the lug-to-lug when you don’t include the end links?
Nice review. I sold my Mk2 as it always felt a little small my wrist. The new 40 is probably perfect for me, but don’t know if I’ll ever get lucky enough to get one again.
Why would you have to get lucky??
@@whereRbearsTeeth because I’m not a high roller, so a forever wait lost, or buying grey.
The size difference between the 39 & 40 is hardly noticeable. In reality it’s a fraction of a mm. And if anything, the 40 looks smaller (less wide) in the flesh. In any case, good luck in acquiring one 👍🏻
Crazy how in one scene the mark 2 looks bigger then the 40 and then the opposite..
40mm is the way to go. Just like the day dates. 36 is a classic but times have changed and 40 mm is in especially if you’re a bigger guy.
Not sure about your L2L measurement, I own a 40mm Explorer and L2L from end to end of the case is less than 47mm ( less than Sub 40 and Sub 41 ), I think you are adding the center link as well. The same L2L is over 47mm on Exp-39 thats why to me new model wears a bit smaller.
Hmmm 39mm has a smaller and potentially more elegant crown. I would not be disappointed with the 40mm, but i do prefer the 39mm, especially as its thinner as well.
How much does the Explorer 40mm weigh with all the links?
I believe that Rolex bringing back the 36 was a boardroom-driven response to the loss of purists, the exceptionally smaller-wristed, and the unisex watch-wearing crowd, when Rolex rather suprisingly discontinued the 36 in favour of the notably larger 39 around the year 2010. Frankly, it would have made more sense to expand the appeal of the Explorer line by updating but keeping the 36 alongside the 39, so folks would at least have an option. Rolex then coming out with the 40mm Explorer to replace the 39, I think, was its nod to further 'modernizing' the Explorer in keeping with the brand's move in recent years to upsize its Datejust and sport model cases, in order to stay competitive. All of this is of course speculation, but I find it difficult to explain in other terms.
I ve also similar wrist with 6.5 inch wrist. I m also hesitant about size of new exp 40mm (51mm incl. end link) on the other hand, proportions of 39mm also doesnt look right to me. Currently I ve IWC Mark XX on bracelet. I m considering to trade it with rolex exp 1
Love this watch but wasn’t sure if many women buying the explorer….
I tried one on @ my AD & compared it to my 39 .
As you mentioned the glossy dial & the Explorer printing at the upper position looks not appealing to me … too shiny ✨
Anyway, I told them that I am interested in buying one .
We will see .
Luckily they had one BB 41 master chrono available with the jubilee bracelet and so bought that watch 😅
Why would you be interested in buying one if you already have the 39 and the 40 doesn’t look appealing to you??
I had a 214270. Even though it was small on my 8.2" wrist, it still didn't look right in terms of the case/bracelet proportions. It looked "bulbous." The 224270 looks to be more integrated between the head of the watch and the bracelet. I believe that this watch is slightly thicker due to the new movement. And yes, I'm on a waitlist. In terms of values for the 214270, they went from just under 7K to nearly 11K and are now trending below 9K. Time will tell. Pun intended.
36 too small, 40 slightly too big, 39 is perfect.
I have a 6.5" wrist as well. The new 36 feels just a bit too small, and the 40 feels just a bit too big. I have a 41 mm submariner and it looks good on my wrist, but I feel that the 40 mm explorer is just a bit too big. I wanted to buy a new explorer from my AD, but I might have to look for a 214270 instead, or the 114270, which is actually 36 mm with 20 mm lug width.
I think the 40 feels big because of how bare the watch is, without the sub’s bezel and less text on the dial, the larger case becomes more apparent
Nice comparison video. I had the MK2 for some time and for some unknown reason, I saw it unbalanced in terms of proportions.
In this case, I have to disagree with you and say that I like the new Explorer 40mm better. Still, I wouldn't buy it again.
@watchyourstyle in your opinion, what is the ideal wrist size for the 40 mm?
I think 7" is ideal, but definitely 6.5" +
Is this the full review or is there a full review of the 40mm you mentioned in your unboxing ?
Sorry! Yeah this is what I was referring to but I still have to get around to doing a dedicated review
The word 'Rolex' looks bigger on the 39mm or is that an optical illusion because of the 3 line text at 12 o'clock on the 40mm?
I think it is bigger because the mk2 text had more room to breathe since it was only two lines versus three.
Hey man I have a question. I own the 124270 and am disappointed by it. In fact, I am thinking of selling it which really disappoints me. For me, the lack of lume on the 124270 is frustrating and it is not as legible as I had hoped. Does the 224270 have more Lume and is more legible then the 124270?
Yes, the lume on the 40 is stronger and the hands are bolder. Depends on how you like the fit of both though! Can’t really go wrong with either
Just for clarification, my 114270 (2007 with rehault) has lume at 3,6, and 9
no it doesnt
Would you say that the 39mm dimensions are better than the 40mm for your wrist size?
Yes definitely! I think the mk2 was spot on and more universal for more wrists
I prefer the EXPLORER wording position on the Mk2 as the dial layout seems more balanced. The text layout on the new 40mm Explorer seems top heavy 🤔 (IMHO).
Agreed that too bad the 36 isnt the true 36，its just a touch too small，mo womder its not selling amd they have to bring the larger size back
Anyone know what the MKII crown size is (in MM)? Also the new 40mm crown size?
The crown is much larger on the 40mm and a bit sharper, but I don't have exact measurements.
on ratios, the new 40mm should have had 22mm lug width to be same ratio 1.8 as the old 14270 and 114270
Bs since the 40 measures 38.9mm, so 21 lugwidth is perfect
04:53: what I think too!
1:42 I really appreciate the side-by-side dimension comparison. So the 40mm is actually not even 39mm, interesting...
Yeah I was pretty shocked when I saw that too! Thanks for watching!
Where do you rank the Exp1 in comparison to your other Rolex watches? Experienced collectors love the Exp but whenever I try it on it seems a bit plain and basic.
I personally own the MK2 Explorer and the 41mm submariner. If I had to choose between the two, I’d definitely take the Explorer all day long over the submariner. I’ve owned a good number of watches, and the Explorer is hands down my favorite one out of them all.
@@whereRbearsTeeth That's funny I'm waiting on a Sub Date and I find that to be my must have Rolex. I think it's a watch you probably have to own and wear to appreciate over time. My Hamilton Khaki is as basic as they come but I love the subtle details.
Plain, basic, minimalistic… that’s the beauty of the Explorer.
@@nads7865I agree. I have had only a sub-date for years and it checks all the boxes.
The bezel is _slimmer_ on the 40mm? It looks the opposite to me.
As in thinner in profile, so I’ve read!
@@watchyourstyle Ah, OK. I tried the 40mm Explorer on two weeks ago, and I liked it all but that wide bezel, which is similar on the DJ 41, which is my main issue with the DJ as well. Something about that wider bezel puts me off. Oh well...
Is there any chance you can compare with air-king ?
I've been thinking about this! Thanks for the suggestion
Surprise, Surprise, everyone thinks the model they own is the best... 36, 39, 40 it's all subjective...
Good to see the 36 mm up against your OP36. Why does the OP look so much better than the explorer..
It really does have better proportions eh?
Horology magazine predicts that by 2030 48mm will be modern sizing.
🤣 🤣
Wrist size aside, the dial just looks to big on the 40 no matter how big you make the markers.
just traded the 39mm for a 114270. the 39mm is a better watch specs wise and no doubt the bracelet and clasp are better but 114270 looks so much better on my 7 inch wrist. I like 39mm/40mm watches but just didn't feel the explorer worked on the larger size
Wow, that’s a rare swap! I’ve been lusting after the 114270, the only thing that’s kept me from getting one is the lack of lumed arabics. But otherwise a near perfect watch!
changed my mind at last minute!i stand by the older 36mm is perfect in size but it just felt a bad trade long term and the lume, bracelet and clasp made me think twice about doing the deal. I think it's reading too many negatives on forums influencer me as if id never read them it felt like the perfect watch 😂
36 all the way. Who wants a collection with only 40mm watches?
an explorer in 38 would be PERFECT
Sounds like you may end up selling the 40…..yes?….wink wink?
🤣 🤣
It comes down to who you are....if you care about heritage and tradition...you are an explorer 36mm man....if you are not...go for the 40mm
This is one of the dumbest comments I’ve seen in a while
Wear a 36 like a real man!
My Rolexes are unsized as I am a bigger guy. The 36 looks ridiculous. Not my words, but the AD, GF and others
The “36” mm is only 35.3mm in reality. It looks ridiculous on most men’s wrist. Not to mention that the proportions are completely off on the new 36. The older 114270 looks much better. The 39 MK2 remains the overall best Explorer.
40mm+ is to big, too heavy and trying too hard. 36mm was and will always be the sweetspot.
36 too small. 45mm best sweetspot
@Lyinmyelin😂
Only for baby , yes
Horology magazine predicts that by 2030 48mm will be modern sizing.
Too bad we can't find them anywhere in the US without going through a bunch of AD horse shit.
Was in Switzerland 3 weeks ago and saw two of them new there but was an idiot and didn't buy one while there because I"m already on the list here. Now my AD is saying instead of 3 mos (Been on the list 4mos) That they don't know because they've only received one so far. So stupid. I'm about over these ridiculous games.
Hi mate, im curious, how much do you wear you exp 1 (either one) vs your bat girl / explorer 2? Thinking about getting one myself ….
My explorer I has moved on to my dad and I no longer have the e2. These days I mostly wear my GMT, an aqua terra, and a Hamilton field auto