Trump Assassination Attempt Questions You Need Answers To!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- In this video, we dive deep into the *Trump Assassination Attempt Questions You Need Answers To!* We explore the lingering questions and mysterious details surrounding the shocking attempt on former President Donald Trump's life. With new revelations and critical insights, we aim to uncover the truth and address the unanswered questions that have left many puzzled.
In this compelling episode, Eric Hunley is joined by Nate the Lawyer, a former police officer, DA, and law professor who has worked with the Secret Service, and Gavin Stone, who has held various intelligence positions with the British government. Adding to the conversation, we have a special video from Lynn Westover, a former US Marine Sniper, sharing his expert views on the Trump assassination attempt. Dive deep into the incident as these experts provide their unique insights and analyses, addressing questions and theories surrounding the attack.
This in-depth discussion covers procedural failures, communication breakdowns, and the response of law enforcement during the incident. Join us for a thorough examination of what really happened during the Trump assassination attempt and the implications it has for future security measures.
Follow Nate on TH-cam at @NateTheLawyer
Follow Gavin on TH-cam at @GavinStoneAuthor
Train with Lynn Westover at www.slcsquared...
Connect with Lynn / lynn-westover
************************************************
🙏 Thank you for coming!
Do you enjoy guests like these? Do you want to interact?
🔔 Subscribe & hit the bell You will be alerted when there is new content
👍 Like the video (I deeply appreciate it and it tells TH-cam to share)
💬 Comment to keep the conversation going
🔗 Share this with anyone who might enjoy it.
👂Listen to the original podcast (200+ episodes) erichunley.com/
📧Get a weekly email digest of my content sendfox.com/er...
Would you like to support me and the channel?
🏠 Find me on Locals at unstructured.l... 🏠
Follow Me on Socials
Twitter / hunleyeric
Gettr gettr.com/user...
Instagram / hunleyeric
💵 Support Me Directly via PayPal paypal.me/eric...
💵 Venmo @EricHunley
🔐 Bitcoin Address: 33E5YbJ3q3kmWih9mwqqrqELqwkm8L82tj
🔐 Ethereum Address: 0x7D3200a55eB322b129d2C6c2C6FECe07B867dd7a
🐲🐉 Do you like Tea? Check out thedragonstrea... and use the code “unstructured” to get 10% off [affiliate link] 🐲🐉
This video was live-streamed with Streamyard you can sign up for free at streamyard.com?pal=5141078521937920 (referral link)
************************************************
Tags and keywords discovered by TubeBuddy. Get your own free copy at erichunley.com... (affiliate)
************************************************
Legal Disclaimer
Opinions expressed in this video are for entertainment only and do not reflect this channel's official stance. We don't endorse views or recommendations given. Information shared shouldn't be used as professional advice. Perform your own research and consult professionals before making decisions based on this content. We're not liable for any loss/damage from relying on this information.
#TrumpAssassinationAttempt #SecretService #IntelligenceAnalysis #LawEnforcement #TrumpAttack #ExpertDiscussion #TrumpShooting #SecurityBreach #GavinStone #NateTheLawyer #LynnWestover #EricHunley #PoliticalViolence #PresidentialSecurity #USPolitics
The footage of the PA falling from the bullet striking the hydraulic line on the forklift can be seen here. th-cam.com/video/euMDXR4vj1o/w-d-xo.html
Thanks for explaining that. We were there and couldn't understand what that was all about.
Thanks for the link. Don't be too hard on people asking 'stupid' questions. If this isn't your field you don't understand how things work. ❤
Bongino & Chris Williamson stated the hydrolic fluid made a mess of the USSS vehicles' windows. If it wasn't a ricochet, that will be a solid trajectory reference. _IF there were more than one perpetrator, was one dedicated to hitting that hydraulic line to interfere with the vehicles egress for medical evacuation?_
Interesting the fbi washed the blood off the roof and patched the bullet holes on the pavement. Why would they do that. Usually law enforcement does its investigation they don’t clean up blood they don’t patch holes
Law enforcement sniper was stated to be in the second story window adjacent to where crooks fired. I want to know if they checked to see if his weapon was fired
January 6, in many instances security guards were holding doors open for people to come in.
Absolutely. I saw the video of security moving aside barriers and ushering people in.
This is the purpose of a Free Press.
Keep the pressure on them to give the people transparent answers & make necessary changes to security.
😅
The strangest question is why so many people seem oblivious to the fact that every other article keeps changing the location of the suspect. Sometimes, he's near the edge of the roof, other times he's much further away from that spot, where you wouldn't be visible from the ground, for all of those initial photos. It just keeps bouncing back and forth between both sets of photos. Completely different locations. Once you see it, you'll wonder why you never did before.
Not only that, but there is an open window right behind the location near the end of the roof. So, bullets shot from that window would be right in line from where they're telling us Crooke was firing. But his body ended up being about 50 feet away from that. That's why there are two different echo times with the bullets. There are, at least, two shooters.
@@Mooseman327I thought that the body was moved to cover the possibility that a (some) shots came from the open window.
I have noticed that!
Tell me: Have you noticed that there's not a single news article which mention "casings recovered"? Isn't that weird? Back when there was a shooting behind my apartment complex (no one was hurt), the police came in and documented the position of every single shell casing. But for a high-profile assassination attempt, there's not even a single mention . . .
@@DionysusVoice Right. They hesitate and then say they recovered five (or later eight) CARTRIDGES . No mention of casings.
The Media has dropped the ball. Thanks Eric for Doing Good Work
Dropped the ball?? They are bat 💩 crazy.
The media does little to find answers or truth. If we don't know what is going on, it is because the mainstream media is bent on not finding out what is really going on.
@@rickyclark4870 Right? They seem to be the mouthpiece for the chaos makers. 😮
Eric Trump did an interview after RNC speech. They didn't tell him there was a threat. He didn't know before he went on stage
No way Don was expecting that, a few Muppets are saying he faked it ! Crazy
Eric, Trump not Eric Trump
@@JDP11768😂 Punctuation is important!❤😂
Sure is. Many don't use it since the birth of texting.
They wouldn't have. Not his job to know. It is the secret service's job. They failed
Everybody just needs to be patient and wait for the Elizabeth Warren Commission Report
That's funny!!
Haha! 😁👍
Omylanta
Hahahahaha
Spot on!😂
Joy Reed is outraged that our government members allowed Trump to take an iconic photograph. Let that sink in!
Only the Che Guevara iconic photo is allowed, according to Reid.
"Joy Reid accuses China of trying to kill Biden with the China virus" :)
Joy Reid lost me when she called Gabbie Petito privileged as she lay dead on the desert floor. What did she call it, oh yeah, missing white woman syndrome.
She is outraged that minorities do not get as much coverage, which she is right to an extent, but SHE IS THE DANG PROBLEM. You want to know who gets the public interested in missing person stories? The media. She is the gatekeeper of the news. She is the one who reports stories, yet she is too busy being obserssed with Trump and her victim narrative, while the missing are forgotten. She doesn't report on the other missing women and that my friend is gaslighting 101.
She blames the system when she is apart of the system. Can you imagine how brainwashed or stupid someone must be to believe anything that this trust fund baby says?
The truth is native women, and Hispanic women barely get coverage, oh and don't forget about men! They could care less about men who go missing. But the issue is not racism. It's the media. They are more concerned about ratings than journalistic integrity.
Sorry for the rant. Joy Reid is not a decent person. I cannot believe anyone actually listens to anything she says.
Who cares.
All that means is joy cannot fathom that a potus has been almost murdered HERE in the USA
No one.
Absolutely NOBODY
Is allowed to comment on a reaction to a failed assassination attempt UNLESS it happened to them. Bolsonaro and reagan.
Everybody else=childish and jealous commentary revealed.
Not even worth commenting here
Except to teach
She's outraged that the SS allowed that kicking screaming g toddler to order them around when he was in clear and present danger. That young man had an agenda for the day: to disrupt the world of the self absorbed and get all of our attention. His agenda was carried out to full completion. SS agenda is to protect the asset: Donald Trump. Their agenda was NOT to take orders from him in the moment. They actually train their Entire service around that moment. They FAILED. None of the MSM noise matters. She's doing her job, and she has a point. It wasn't the time, which is 🤯mind numbing that you'd deflect to shaming a reporter over pointing out the obvious. HE WANTED THAT PHOTO OP, and he Always seems to get what he wants.
Note, I am an Aerospace Engineer and MS Mechanical Engineer. The analysis is excellent!
hope you dont work on Boeing Starliner, Chris !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :(
@@dks13827 did you watch the video I posted? I doubt it! Bottom line, presupposing the data used by the analyst is real (they used Fox live data feed)...the analysis is not only good, but correct. The conclusions are ONLY on distance...NOTHING MORE!
@@chrishansen5513 What video?
@@windywednesday4166 drop down below... it's there!
I have a question that nobody is asking yet. On the Rollcall website Biden takes a flight from his beach home to the White House in the wee hours of July 13th 18 hours before the shooting
According to the Public Schedule calendar he arrives at the beach house Friday evening July 12th then leaves at 12:10am arriving to the White House at 12:30am he gives his remarks around 8pm from the Rehoboth convention center…. How come no one is talking about this? No one asked Karine at her first press conference what was going on that required the president to come to the White at 12:30am on Saturday July 13th
Cue situation room photo :)
@@musa7606exactly!
A little late night situation room meeting to tidy up lose ends and eat some ice cream.
Probably just shit himself again and Jill forgot the diaper bag.
When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras
CONTAINMENT
Around here more likely deer.
Lol. This saying is stupid because it lacks ANY context, and context is VERY important with situations like this.
You'll hear a lot of zebras in Africa, not many horses.
There are a lot of places, even in the US where donkeys are more common. Specifically, miniature donkeys.
@@DeadlyPlatypus ironically recently we had some Zebra escape a Trailer on the freeway shoulder when the owner was checking on them. So making assumptions like this can be wrong.
-- or _cloven ones_
Y'all are assuming that everything that is being reported is the truth and factual. Why? This is a big mistake to assume this.
Imho, the narrative surrounding the lone shooter, seems a little too picture perfect and right out of a mold🕵🏽♀️
It's the CIA way. And 3 names, joining the ranks of Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, Thane Eugene Cesar. They don't think we can figure it out???
Smith: “Let’s register him as a Republican!”
Jones: “No. Too on the nose.”
Jones: “.... Ok, go ahead!”
@@susurration19 They tell you all three names to disambiguate them from OTHER people with the same first and last names.
I guarantee that before their assassinations, there were hundreds of "Lee ____ Oswalds" and "John ____ Booths."
I doubt he went around introducing himself as "Thomas Matthee Crooks."
Thank you Eric. Good shows man!
@1:11:00 @Eric Hunley we successfully used small periscopes in Afghanistan as late as 2011 to be able to look around corners and over roof tops so as not to expose ourselves to potential fire. I don’t think it’s a silly idea at all. Police can slave their body worn camera to their phones to do the same kind of thing.
Thanks! It just kind of popped in my head.
It can't be just plain incompetence or lack of communication. This shooter casually walks around for a while looking around, etc.
They know there is a suspicious person in the immediate area, not a threat just yet and then lose sight of him. Who ever was in charge should have simply told Trump he has to delay his speech until they can locate that person first by sweeping the area.
Regardless of the explanation or lack thereof for why they didn't take this guy out before he was shooting, there is no explanation for allowing Trump to take the stage and stay on the stage for several minutes when they had to know the potential of what was about to happen
At the end of the day...the Secret Service director is still employed !!
you bet YOUR life she is !!!!!!!!!!
Because, in reality, she did her “job” quite well! Perhaps…?🤔
@georgecisneros5281 The Secret Service has TWO jobs:
1. Fighting counterfeiting (nearly impossible to stop).
2. Protecting the President and a FEW other specific protectees.
As SOON as a protectee is shot, you've FAILED half of your job.
I was an Intel officer. My subordinates had a LOT of responsibilities, but I can promise you, if one of them had left the secure area unlocked or completely unattended, they'd have faced very fast, very severe punishment.
As far as we know, her "superiors" haven't even given her a stern talking-to.
No. Definitively and objectively, she was and IS sh×t at her job.
@@DeadlyPlatypus Yes, but I think you missed his point.
@@Doxymeistertotally missed the point. You expect Mayorkis to give her a stern talking to? Fantasy land
Putting out lots of videos! Great job Eric!! Totally making up for the Baldwin de-backle !!! Ty. I think Gavin & your collaboration has finally hit the mark!!
THE OBJECT ON THE TOP OF THE WATER TOWER IS A FLAG. WATCH THE MOVEMENT AND YOU CAN BARELY SEE THE FLAG POLE IN THE BACKROUND.
I would want to talk to the SS supervisor for this event, not the director of the SS.
That's what I say, that person is the one directly responsible for all this happening yet no one is asking who that person is.
Hitler’s had his SS , and Biden has his if only for a few more months, so long Corn 🌽 pop !
@michaelb8957 Yes, as far as I know we don't even have a name yet.😮
How many shell casings were found/photographed.
Classified for 75 years.
I’ve seen no indication that they photographed or marked casing locations. The casings would not match the number of shots recorded.
Wouldn’t match the gun found either.
@@dckatyx9577did you forget that there was a dangerously steep slope to the roof? They're probably in the grass
There was a period (12 minutes I have heard) when they first got to the rooftop with no body camera recordings released to the public. Anything could have been planted, moved or removed then.
The Secret Service Counter Sniper took a photo of him on the roof 20 minutes before; took a photo. With or without a gun spotted, the Secret Service identified him enough as a threat to take a photo.
Thank you Eric. You always keep us informed and explore possibilities. Great job as usual.
Thank you for having people with firsthand knowledge of how this stuff works, And for doing your due diligence to research the event timeline and factors.
Unfortunately I’m old enough to remember these assignations and attempts starting with JFK. I’m not ruling out that there are nefarious actors involved here just because of the multiple lapses in security
I thought Crooks used a range finder on the rooftop.
But if he was able to get into the venue with it, and was also spotted using it by security….
that takes this yet again to the next level of failures.
Dude it literally doesn't matter, USSS sniper watch crooks make his way up the roof for 20 minutes before the cops even lifted themselves up.
Even a good-faith security person would have said: "Hey, that range finder kind of represents a potential danger, you'll need to leave it in the car before we'll let you in."
Simple as.
@@DeadlyPlatypus You can’t even get into Disney World with a selfie stick. And umbrellas were not allowed at the rally.
Bag check was obviously one more layer of security failure.
Probably another fill-in who didn’t even know what a range finder was when she saw one.
Nope they let him in with it.
So nice of Zuck to have a change of heart after illegally changing the outcome of the last election.
Yes, it is so heart warming. What a great guy he is (sarcasm).
Or is Zuck trying to CYA, cause he knows Trump is going to win.
Regarding the police officer getting a boost to look over the roof... What happened to the ladder the kid used to get on the roof?
It was on a different building. My understanding is that he jumped roofs.
Policeman were on the other side of the building ... back vs front side
Those ladders were from police. The kid climbed up an ac unit
@@michaellind9699 I had not heard that before. Thank you.
No mattet what you say, or do, someone will find something wrong! 😅
Keep up the good work
Great post!!! Loved your guests and topics.
Thank you for all your informative videos
❤❤❤😊thank you Eric I really enjoyed the VIDEO and guests 😊😊
The top of the water tower is a red herring. the vent cap is shaped somewhat oddly and the light is coming from the left leaving the right side in shadow. the software that runs the camera is trying to extrapolate what is there and is adding and removing pixels to approximate what it thinks should be there. it happens all the time with digital photography, especially from longer distances.
Ah, that makes more sense than a 10-foot tall person. 😮❤
12:00... cops dont point guns at people without just cause?! @Nate there is a ton of videos on line that prove otherwise .
Truth absolute truth
Just because YOU don't understand WHY a cop may pull a gun does not mean THEY did not have a reason.
@@rickgreen2182 Explain WHY the camo-clad cop pulls the rifle on Trump briefly, after he just entered the vehicle. Seemed like he heard in his mic, "this is last chance" and briefly contemplated. Focus your answer please on why cop may legitimately have done this.
Yes! Just posted the same question!
What ya said Nate 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Getting footage of this is very important. Remember the Zapruder film.
Go ahead and look at the Scale of the Water Tower image and then discount it entirely, Eric.
That would be Andre the Giant up there.
Thanks for doing this stream. I learned a lot and you guys are the voice of reason- so appreciated!!
The hobo in the centre seems much more calm than the "suspicious" lady.
Right? And wearing that jacket on a hot day when everybody else is in short sleeves? The woman was taking video, 'The hobo' was texting somebody or reading a text on his phone...
That closing rant with Nate was awesome 😂😂😂
The FBI is analyzing the audio to figure out how many shells they need to photograph.
Didn’t see the 1 st video you played. With the hydraulic fluid. It didn’t show in your video. To clarify
Mist (hydraulic fluid) was eye witness testimony (second podcast Eric did on this subject)
I'm guessing it has to do with where the cameras are focused and/or how likely a mist would show up with camera movement.
Eric also doesn't want to be demonitized by TH-cam. Any violence, shooting, language will kill his $.
The ending is so classic! Hahaha. Such a patriotic speech with America singing in the back. Hahaha
Glad to see this Part 2, Eric!
Nice touch, Eric, the "National Anthem" during Nate's soliloquy. Thank you, Gavin for joining, and all of you for bringing a voice of calm and reason to the discussion.
I always appreciate Nate, I think he has 0 tolerance for bullshit
100% ❤ Nate. He always adds a value.
Excuse me if the “citizen” on the ground can see and it is obvious from the videos that this person is not part of a security detail then so can law enforcement. Law enforcement has elevated itself to where they think they are an above “citizens”. I have a saying expertise is blinding and law enforcement has fallen into that trap. This country has serious issues with groups setting themselves up as special and no one else can understand their job.
Which is more reliable: the required 4 to 8 year college degree for a job with a government agency? Or, common sense and some boots on the ground experience?
If we questioned Fauci's science, we were questioning science as an entity or god.
This will end just like every other Congressional investigation into Marxist Democrat criminal acts. The FBI is stumped, the CIA wasn't involved and the Secret Service will revise their procedures and protocols. No one will be held accountable. Those responsible will be promoted. It's always the same.
Yes it's not rocket science
It's clear they didn't radio in
To get trump of stage
All institutions are crumbling bc they can’t be transparent. Giving law enforcement the benefit of the doubt here is pride, ignorance or sinister
That water tower thing just looks like digital artifacting to me. You can't rely on digital cameras to accurately show what was there. Especially being out of focus from so far away.
Thanks Eric another great report!
When i went to a rally people had to throw out everything...
Yes. They even threw out our bottles of water. But water was free inside. Maybe there is a danger in water bottles. I had a great time both rallies though. Felt safe and comfortable because of the protectors.
But if I am a law enforcement officer, I need to be ready to shield innocent people. I'm sorry, rules don't count for me if I see a man on the roof, pointing a gun at me, if I'm armed he or maybe both of us are history. Just my opinion.
Saw an audio analysis where they actually used math and science to try and figure out the distance of all the shots. Each shot had a crack and a snap associated with each shot. They concluded that shots were fired from at least 3 different distances. Supposedly, according to the official story, the sniper who took him out only fired one shot. So, then they are attributing all other shots to Crooks. But one of those shorts (I think it was the sixth) is consistent with almost twice the distance from Trump than the other shots. The distance to the water tower was consistent with that distance but doesn't mean the shot came from there. Could have been another location that far away.
Thank you Eric in your efforts to help us learn the truth.
Excellent discussion! Thank you! Thank you all of you! Keep the analysis coming!
What did the officer do in the next 2 minutes.Officer safety was well explained we don't care about the other people 😮😮
LOVE what you do Eric!
Love Nate and you!!!
local cops were on traffic duty ONLY
Yet they were the only LE officers to respond to a radio call of the shooter on the roof. They at least tried.
Not true
Great video Eric.
Cheatle stating they didn’t have someone on the roof bc of the slope is proof that this is not mere incompetence… she was mocking the question and flaunting her power
Right? It's also a form of misdirection. As we're all making fun of her for saying that, there is something else we're not looking at. 😮
Why has none of the 50+ eyewitnesses of the shooter on the roof verified that there were two cops accessing the roof and confronting the perp ? Story sounds sus.
Thx Guys , you are all great. Big Big fan of your sniper friend, he explain things in a great Way.
Great show! I had not seen a breakdown of where the other shooting victims were in the crowd.
The lunacy of the woman saying she says it was fake followed by the right to the point of the 3D Model and the girl narrating.... IS PURE GOLD.
Awesome show today🎉
The photo at 39:00 shows the incorrect position of the shooter. He was on the opposite end of the roof which is why sniper team 1 had an obscured view of him, leading sniper team 2 to take the shot.
No, that's more likely the correct position, as there are far more video and photos, from regular people, to support it. They moved the body to support the narrative of the "obscured view". Every other article, shows a different location. This is an important fact to pay attention to, since none of the podcasters out there are.
@@corneliusoverton2617 nope, you are just wrong. Watch those videos again and play close attention.
@@geetarbube I've watched many videos on this. Most have him at the edge of the roof. You can even see below the knee, of the surrounding officers. That wouldn't be possible if he was where you say. You're just looking at one video. Look at the other set as well.
@corneliusoverton2617 there's literally helicopter footage showing the shooter closer to the far side of the building. The blood is running down from the body, it wasn't moved. That would be VERY sus if it was. That's a crime scene and they wouldn't be moving the body. If they dud, there would still be blood where he was when shot.
@@melissacraig9941 I know, I've seen that footage too. That's the point. If there are two sets of footage, showing the body in different spots, then we've uncovered an incontrovertible lie. Just google for all the photos. You'll see it for yourself. I'll go with multiple people's cell phone footage over some shady ABC news copter.
Great show TY gentlemen
Per the water tower, it was very hot that day. Heat coming off objects or ground affects the way things look to our brain and even can be photographed.
When Joy Reid said that about covid the expression on Jen's face all I could hear was the Skeletor "What?" from the old Heman series Lol
1:03:25 That image demonstrates the line of sight to the speaker; bleacher and screen heights could be estimated if the guest really wanted to ballpark quantify that incredulity. _The roof teams behind the stage would have their view obstructed looking up to return fire--_ Audio analysis suggests unacounted positions. The question remains open and discouraging inquiry rather than suggesting people out there math and model it out is undesirable. We can't wait another near century as with Kennedys ('swamp drainer' balked on the scheduled file declassification; if he was serious about that or stealing the independents back from RFK Jr., a campaign promise to release them would do the trick.)
Eye witness testimony is fraught for good reason-- Melody Hook's interview and hunter background on *Redacted* stating she heard and believes some rounds came from above and to the right given her seating position gives pause with reference to the tower question [a presence there would be flush or near to regardless of video artifacts; if the AGR building wasn't secured what makes that hide immune with the alleged perp flying a drone on the day--]
The top of the water tower: don't look at the blob at the top of the tower, look at some of the other blobs, e.g. the edges of the trees. You will see appearing and disappearing and shimmering movements looking just the same as the shadow on the tower.
When a video is very blown-up the effects of the compression algorithm becomes very apparent. The video is struggling to resolve tiny details which it is unable to consistently resolve. It's right on the bleeding edge of what the compression can do.
Imagine you are given a b/w photograph taken in fog in which there are vague shadowy shapes of, say, people and told to draw lines around the people. The edges are hazy, it's difficult and you do your best. That photo is taken away and you are given another print, just the same. You do your best to do the same outlining, then again, then again. Now if all those photographs were projected in sequence your drawn outlines would shimmer and dance because you didn't make exactly the same decision as to where to draw the line on every photo.
That's the equivalent of what's happening here with the struggling algorithm.
Great job!!!
Amazing speech. Thank you, Nate!
1) The City Manager looks scared as hell. 2) Why is he, rather than the police telling this story? 3) Witnesses dispute his story.
TYM Hunley very informative
Why remote device in Crooks' car -- insurance in case he backed out.
Or a diversion tactic so he can escape?
If there was FBI in the crowd and asked the guy in the middle with the hat 🤠 how high are you? Then he had answered.. hi how are you 😅😂
Great show Eric, thank you.
@49:23, re: the shadow on top of water tower....that's too big to be a human. Remember we're looking at the water tower which is way on the other side of the trees from the camera vantage. Now look at the size of the people in the foreground. Compare that to the size of the shadow on top--that shadow is WAY too big to be a human. Plus you can see the heat shimmer faintly, notice how the edges of the image of the water tower swim in and out of focus--including the dark spot next to the top, and it all does it congruently. I think we're looking at the shadow of the cap portion that's going slightly out of focus, not a person. *EDIT* Lynn hit the nail on the head, I think.
Law Enforcement from NOW ON has to realize "persons of interest" especially if they have rangefinders, pace in front magnetometers etc... should be approached, questioned, and fully monitored. This was a complete failure of epic proportions...
It was my impression that the person on the water tower (under the assumption someone was there) did not take any shots. I think the impression is that the shooter wasn’t alone. Did you hear the guy who talked about having gone to a ‘16 rally at the same place and was shocked at the difference in service this time? In ‘16, there were sniper pairs on every roof and high point. This time there were maybe 2 pairs?
Eric, sky news has a drone video where you can see the ladder. My question is if there was some sort of law enforcement in that building… well the building beside the shooters building there is a 2 story building and that building has a walkout window to the roof. Clear shot of the shooter. It doesn’t make sense. The window was open in drone video.
The video is clear as mud
LOL 4:28 We can't see it!
Hanlon's razor is wrong. Incompetence is a form of malice. Treat the stupid as enemy actors, for they are.
😂 Very true! TBF in my experience both are very true.
There are some very interesting audio analysis claiming there were at least 2 people shooting towards the stage, based on coming from different distances. Chris Martenson of Peak Prosperity has a video on it.
@@ASouthernBoyCanSurvive you obviously haven’t seen it. You should 🙂
The irony is ; #1) the ladder the shooter used was still in place...so the "hoist" narrative is damage control.
#2) the very building had SS officers (and probably state police ) inside..
But not on or around the perimeter..
I can take recent graduates from basic training and tell them to. ecure a perimeter....and they will do better..
When you are on asset protection, "Officer safety" is NOT the priority...this is not a domestic...
If the office didn't know if a 20yo in civilian clothing isn't SS there is a faure (especially since they were inside and.the.officers probably knew it )
Yes, I've done asset protection .. yes I was military, yes I was a "cop" .. I wore a blue beret in the Balkans..
This was an absolute failure of policy, and tactics.. on a basic level..
Stop being apologists for absolute failure.
There was over an hour to engage and detain ... It didn't happen..
Then you already recognize that the number of coincidental "failures" points to a centralized smaller number of individuals who instated a flawed security plan, deflected and downplayed risks, obfuscated.
The SS snipers literally watch him with a gun on the roof for over 20 minutes.
"Failure in communication?"
Come on Nate.
Also, even operation mockingbird outlets like CNN are deporting 3 different shooters.
He was trespassing on private property. Stop covering for this.
@@bewell6019 What you just said was an absolute soup sandwich of assumption and clear misunderstanding of not only what I said nor what happened...
Or you just grabbed a thesaurus and don't realize a thesis with big words that don't correlate to a single rational point isn't in fact a thesis at all..
Talk sector, talk AO talk responsibility of zone protection.. or put down the google a minute and sit this one out
@@Kmurray9244 I'm taking issue with your characterization that this was _merely_ a set of abject "failures". YT censoring requires that I post comments so tailored that they no longer make sense - blame the post-incident colluders, not me.
Rather than believing in exponential failure, it is more likely the simple solution that makes fewer assumptions. One logistics officer in an official capacity that [intentionally] shuts down the ability for compartmentalized agents to operate in a cohesive and effective manner. Probability.
Check Dan Bongino's take. Bongino was part of the Presidential Protective Division (PPD), which is responsible for providing security for the President and his family. The PPD is a highly specialized unit that requires agents to undergo rigorous training and have extensive experience in executive protection.
SS Director Cheadle selectively placed DHS members from a different field office due to Trump's regular detail being "overworked". We'll find out tomorrow more about her decisions. Which of her underling(s) may be criminally culpable may be revealed too. Or it may all be explained by exponential failures.
🤷♂
Excellent. Thank you.
Eric, have you covered the woman behind Trump on right? Only Zapruder had camera out faster
Candace has. Ep 29👍
Also, The Behavior Panel covers her. Most recent episode.
@@joanneblack7697The most recent one is on Spidey's Channel, 'The Behavioral Arts', with Chase Hughes. They look specifically at this woman.
The comedy video alone made me give a Like!😅
Knowledge of the height of the structure on the top of the water tower would tell you if the "shadow" is even possible to be a person
Instead of being boosted up on the roof by another officer, why didn't the Officer just use the same ladder the perp did that is shown in the picture?
The water tower flicker is a video compression artifact; nothing more.
Interesting. It certainly looks like a person to me but the video is so bad you can't tell. Even if it is a person, I can think of three reasons why somebody would be up there.
I thought Nate was in his early 30s. I had no idea he'd had prior careers! And I'm a subscriber!
Right? Police officer, lawyer, law professor... and TH-cam Rockstar. ❤😂
Why are so many media sources putting the shooter on the wrong location on the building? It is like they are putting the shooter in the correct position of where the shots came from but not where Crooks actually was.
48:56 - Eric, I'm a professional photographer and aerial photographer as well, and I personally think that the "shadow" on the water tower is simply being visually affected by heat waves, as is the whole image of the water tower. That causes distortions all the time, and there's not much the best of lenses can do to filter them out.
I love Nate !! This guy rocks
Love your channels. This is great. Love AUS with mark.
Thank you for not announcing every super chat every 30 secs in lives.
Secret Service has a lot broader discretion than regular law enforcement Nate.
That lady made a video record of history in the making, no matter if it was good or bad. It was still a historic moment.
The SS is in charge
the area should have been closed to everyone except security.
You can't have people running around like that.
I remember Nate and Eric I think from Rittenhouse trial on Rekeita. Keep up great work!