ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Bigger Picture Conference: Confluence of Philosophy, Feminism & Queer Theory Heather Brunskell-Evans

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 มิ.ย. 2023
  • Heather Brunskell-Evans has been at the forefront of the
    campaign to protect the rights of gender
    non-conforming children and young people since
    2015. She is a key figure in academia who has
    analysed and challenged the claims of Queer
    Theory and the social construction of the
    “transgender child.’
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Please subscribe, comment, like and share!
    Support our work: genspect.org/d...
    Follow us on Social Media:
    Twitter: / genspect
    Facebook: / genspect
    Instagram: / genspectinternational
    TikTok: www.tiktok.com...
    TH-cam: / @genspect
    Rumble: rumble.com/use...
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    #GenspectBiggerPicture #TimesUpWPATH #BeyondWPATH

ความคิดเห็น • 35

  • @DeTransAllianceCanada
    @DeTransAllianceCanada ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This speaks to the issue of why the language we use matters. The term "transwoman" implies such a unicorn exists: a man who became a woman. I believe it is important to use descriptive terms: man with a gender identity, woman with a gender identity. Simply put, there exists a need to position the counter agruement in a biological reality matrix within which man and woman are meaningful constructs.

  • @florenceellis214
    @florenceellis214 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I hope this talk reaches a wider audience!

  • @sarahbartlett4945
    @sarahbartlett4945 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wonderful Heather! And yes Wpath must be shut down. It is perfectly thinkable and will happen. Thank you so much for your research. Xxx

  • @blallikutube
    @blallikutube ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Brava, philosophy demands that we make up our own minds, not that we seek authoritative opinions on TH-cam, or anywhere else. Very well put.

  • @twatmunro
    @twatmunro ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Unlike most people, I've actually read Foucault (Madness and Civilization, The Birth of the Clinic, some volumes of History of Sexuality, Discipline and Punish, I Pierre Riviera, lots of commentary.) I don't think his work is anything like as original or as important as Brunskell-Evans does, but I'll concede that it does have some heuristic power and it works in this context, ie, discussing the construction of categories of transgenderism. I think the problem with Foucault is that his critique of the social order is a deliberate attempt to destroy the traditional ties and social mores that have historically bound us together. Remember, the power that Foucault was seeking to speak truth to was a very different system of power to the elite that holds power today. If anything, the modern Tavistock is very much a Foucauldian construction.
    I agree though, that there's real value in the tools that Foucault has bequeathed us.

    • @joane24
      @joane24 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's similar to what I've thought of him as well, although I'm not that very much versed in his work (other than just snippets you learn when you do a degree in humanities). That some of his theories and concepts are quite useful to navigate and understand our current times and social and cultural processes, however, that he also didn't like traditional values and had a clear and unreasonable bias against them (unreasonable because they didn't fit into his views, wants, and lifestyle, instead of having had countered them basen on reasonable arguments... there was clear bias and misrepresentation of the history when it came to traditional values, the Church, etc.).

    • @gregorytaylor9104
      @gregorytaylor9104 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      James Lindsay did a a rebuttal video to the likes of Brunskell-Evans
      th-cam.com/video/IhoxLa3ghRY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=9WlRvovHX9ZHmTGM

  • @LoudMinded
    @LoudMinded ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you for this perspective.

  • @cestmoi4532
    @cestmoi4532 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you for this video!

  • @ElizabethDohertyThomas
    @ElizabethDohertyThomas ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Fantastic lecture. Wow!

  • @treesart6914
    @treesart6914 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is a very good talk! I wish more people would listen.

  • @TheSapphire51
    @TheSapphire51 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Very informative indeed. Great to hear Foucault explained and ethics put to the forefront. Can it be said that Gillian Butler is misrepresenting Foucault?

  • @billkosses3808
    @billkosses3808 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    (c5.10) Reification of the social construct of gender! Get in!!! 👍🏽❤
    Spot bloody on

  • @horseluv7315
    @horseluv7315 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Foucault isn't exactly a saint. Alfred Kinsey and John Money are also to blame for the situation we are in today.

    • @leespencer9843
      @leespencer9843 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I don't know how you can blame John Money. He, incorrectly, believed that gender identity was flexible and could be formed by socialization. Gender ideology folks believe that these people are 'born this way.' That they have some sort of aberration in their brains such that they were 'born into the wrong body.' John Money would have never said anything like that. Also, I'm not sure how Alfred Kinsey has any role here. He just described what he found in his interviews.

  • @AnnaBanana1706
    @AnnaBanana1706 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent. Thank you!

  • @robertmarshall2502
    @robertmarshall2502 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wpath, Epath, psychopath, sociopath

  • @d-pooly79
    @d-pooly79 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    By rejecting her daughter's 'transitioning' social or otherwise, the mother IS supporting her daughter. In a few years, when her daughter has grown out of this utter brainwashing, she will be eternally grateful her mother shut the cult behaviour down.

  • @jkscout
    @jkscout ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'd love to her on Jordan Peterson. I'm pretty sure he'd be as impressed by her arguments as I am.

  • @leespencer9843
    @leespencer9843 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why does she pronounce medicine as if it were a two-syllable word?

    • @treesart6914
      @treesart6914 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who cares.

    • @leespencer9843
      @leespencer9843 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't know why it bothers me, but I do expect smart people to pronounce words correctly.@@treesart6914

  • @leespencer9843
    @leespencer9843 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't think 'normatize' is a word.

  • @somerandomhomeboy
    @somerandomhomeboy ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Could this top-down (revolution? phenomenon?) trend be a consequence of career-focused academics/ intellectuals/artists/creatives (etc, etc) just being bad parents? Especially in the absence of an extended family to ground parents and children into a broader reality?

  • @mvondoom
    @mvondoom ปีที่แล้ว

    phenomena are real; diagnoses are culturally situated

  • @loganjames3789
    @loganjames3789 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not exactly connvinced of her defence of Foucault. But her arguments are 100% intellectual and theoretical... and I'm not an intellectual.

  • @LordBlk
    @LordBlk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wasnt too convinced.
    Foucault was a dirtbag and his theory very much disregards the value/merit of truth. As i understand it.
    But its easy to see how there is some good in the idea, but it isnt ground breaking.
    The combination with marxian thought and ferierian ideas makes for an easy way out to those who want to misuse/dishonestly use those philosphies to their ends.

    • @gregorytaylor9104
      @gregorytaylor9104 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      James Lindsay puts your case in a video, effectively rebutting the argument by H B-R.
      th-cam.com/video/IhoxLa3ghRY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=9WlRvovHX9ZHmTGM

  • @poodlerockin
    @poodlerockin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good content but presentation is sorely lacking.

  • @uncleskipsprairiejustice9367
    @uncleskipsprairiejustice9367 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My dear Ms Brunskell Evans, have you considered getting a tablet or a laptop and maybe just standing at the podium? I know it's 2023 and a strange new world, but, please, join us.