No tricks by Tudor. For the money Tudor offers extremely excellent value. It is holding strong and their sports models will climb up in value. Tudor is a very reputable company, delivering a great product.
@@bngr_bngr "I rather buy a Seiko. If I want a Rolex, why would I buy a Tudor?" Because it is an excellent Swiss watch without the games played by Rolex re supply and price.
@@qiranwang because they like the watch? Plus who doesn't love to spend less money on a service and be able to take them to most watch makers out there
You should do your research too. Tudor is Rolex. All the workers in Geneva work for Rolex. There is no Tudor signe on the paycheck. The Tudor 58 is exactly what I would have expected from Rolex in the '90ies. And the retro vibe is breathtaking when you hold her in your hands. Greetz from Lucerne, Switzerland.
Wow, use Google, you will feel extremely stupid for this comment shortly after you read the search results. "Montres Tudor SA, or simply Tudor, is a Swiss watchmaker based in Geneva, Switzerland. Registered in 1926 by Hans Wilsdorf, founder of Rolex, the brand remains a sister company to Rolex; both companies are owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation."
Like Ferrari did a few years back. Some Ferrari dealers will not let you in the showroom unless you can prove you have owned a luxury sports car in the past.
The only word I can use to describe a Rolex "Pepsi" is gauche. Still, we all have different tastes. If (as I suspect) all Rolex indices are made of white gold, I'll never wear any Rolex. Gold is prohibited for a Muslim man (but it's permissible for women) and it's easy to avoid. I do admire Rolex for restricting supply, and actually, I can see the sense in the snootiness of retailers - they want to know that the watch is going to a gentleman. Unfortunately the flip side of that is the "flipping" phenomenon: pre-owned (let's just call it what it is and say secondhand) selling for a price higher than the brand new retail figure! That's madness.
I wouldn't give Rolex my money , as they think they are more important than the customer, I get plenty of people asking about my Seiko king samarai which is ten times more affordable than a Rolex list price Also Seiko do everything in house . From the movement to the bracelet, and here's a crazy idea. You don't have to qualify for any of their watches even grand Seiko which in my opinion are better built than a Rolex as they are all handmade
Tudor is a sister company to Rolex. Both are owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation. You get a lot more watch for your money when you buy a Tudor rather than an over priced, over hyped Rolex.
@@weeksy68Oh is there a waiting list again? Which model are you getting? To me, it’s well worth the hype. No question. In fact I even prefer it over the Sub because it’s not luxury in appearance, has a slimmer look, and I love the snowflake hour hand. Plus COSC certified, mine runs -0.4 spd faithfully
Tudor was registered as a company in 1926 by Hans Wilsdorf, the founder of Rolex. Tudor is a sister company of Rolex, and both companies are owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation.
"Rolex shortages are true shortages" - are they made from unobtanium? No. Rolex play the same game as Ferrari - "make on less car than the market wants" They create their own shortages on purpose. Tudor aren't Rolex - I am fairly sure this wont be a revaluation to anyone who subscribes to your channel. What Tudor are is a manufacturer of good quality watches that have a different marketing strategy Rolex - and I am sure a tiny budget in comparison, but they use it smartly, creating demand through reviewers, influencers etc. and then supplying that demand with product in volume - probably every company in the world would see that as sound and smart marketing. "If you get a Tudor you will get hosed" - Mark, maybe take off your Rolex-shaped goggles for a minute and join the real world - most people should buy watches that they love and want to wear, not as a growth investment. If people buy a Rolex (and the tiny % of other brands which appreciate) and put them in a bank vault along with their gold bars, bearer bonds and Fabergé Eggs' that is not watch collecting or hobbying, that is something very different.
Rolex are not playing games. The market demand has grown for particular Rolex watches but they have simply not increased production. They are a conservative company that does not get carried away with hype. They have seen the market go up and down many times since their founding.
Watches are made by craftsmen. You can't just DOUBLE production simply because the demand doubled. How long do you think it takes to train a watchmaker that makes it by hand? How many people you know want to even go into that field of work? This isn't like accounting or software engineering industry. The supply of labor is extremely rare.
Rolex fired the old watchmaker craftsmen in 2008 and replaced with younger watchmakers as a cost saving, they could employ more if they wanted to. They choose not to.
Pre-owned Tudor prices in the USA are now equal to or slightly more than new MSRP. In addition, the build quality is equal to a comparable Rolex model. Tudors are certified chronometers and the GMT has a 70 hour power reserve. The only difference is the grade of stainless- 316 vs. 904, and who among my fellow Rolex/Tudor wearers can detect that difference? I own both so believe me when I say the Tudor is a tremendous value and equal in performance to a Rolex.
Not in uk i just brought a pelagos 42mm 2 months old for £3,000 they retail at £4,100 over here. If you look around all i looked at are well under MSRP. I have 2 rolex , GMT and Deepsea that go for nearly double the retail price which is just stupid
Not now, grey market prices are tumbling, and now that I've heard the new mega Rolex factory is fired up, the guy market prices will continue to fall. I too paid 3k for the LHD Pelagos and love it!@@leekindell9937
Buying a premium watch for investment is the first mistake. With the exception of Rolex and some specific models from other brands most watches fall in value on the secondary market. Even buying a Rolex SS Sport at an elevated secondary market price can be disastrous. Your strategy for waiting out the hype of a new watch introduction is generally correct. That said if you buy a Tudor sport at a decent price you’ll never regret it
I have 2 Rolex watches I also have a Tudor and I have just ordered another Tudor you only lose money if you sell it !! The Tudors are a beautiful watch
The same group that owns Rolex owns Tudor. So while it's technically true that Rolex doesn't own Tudor, they are sister companies owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation. So saying Rolex doesn't own Tudor is a matter of semantics.
True. Like equating GM owns Cadillac and Ford owns Lincoln. For all intents and purposes It’s correct to say. One could say Tudor owns Rolex…. In my mind the best way to think is certainly they are owned by the same company.
I agree I have two tutors didn’t buy them as an investment. Will probably pull the trigger on the BB 54 because I like the watch a lot. Making money out of my watches it is not going to happen and I know that.
I sold my submariner because I felt uncomfortable wearing it. I realized my pelagos never left my wrist. Very understated and flies under the radar easily. Bought it used for a 3500.
@@MrMatt1923 because it’s a lot of watch to wear. Anything that’s says Rolex is such a statement piece. Some of us work jobs that make that uncomfortable. I’m in sales and wearing a Rolex can at times make the customer feel uncomfortable. You should never act like you make more money than them.
@@floridaman727 exactly my point. I have Rolex, Tudor, Breitling and Oris… I am also a Sales Executive and I basically never use my sub, because it catch so much unwanted attention and some customers feels intimidated by it.
I remember the day when you would purchase a watch to wear it, not to flaunt it. Yea most buy Tudor because they can’t get Rolex. But some but just because we want it. My Pelagos is 7 years old now and has never left my wrist. And I don’t consider it a Rolex in any way. I actually prefer it over the Rolex brand. Tudor is now what Rolex was 20 years ago.
Fairly accurate analysis except that you missed mentioning an important point in my opinion. Tudor watches end up on the grey market not because their previous owners were unhappy or dissatisfied. They end up there because their previous owners got hooked on luxury watches and upgraded. They are entry level luxury watches and nothing gets you motivated to jump into the luxury watch market like a Tudor.
no if you want to buy your first Rolex they ask for a buying history and dealers offer to sell you a Tudor first and buyers dump these on the grey market most of the time unused
I bought my BB58 black because I really liked it and is great bang per buck for a in house movement watch. I own Rolex and Omega and my BB58 gets the most wrist time..
I doubt anyone thinks Tudor is a Rolex, however a properly kept Tudor or any good quality watch that for a while has a name for it will rise in value when the model gets discontinued, and they do after 5-15 years, so enjoy your good quality watch for long term since that is why you bought it in the first place. Don't flip like a stock market share. Happy new everyone, enjoy while you have them and be grateful for having them 😊.
@Silver Fox So it's pretty safe to say that in practicality they own Tudor? In which case the reasons people mention that Rolex "owns" Tudor still stand. Meaning it sort of doesn't matter to correct people.
That's the whole trick : What does a guy buy when he has alot of money burning a hole in his pocket and he can't get no Rolex ? Right an Omega So here comes Tudor in the game. They create a little bit of the Rolex Aura arround their New models and tadaa our guy with the burning money in his pocket buys a Tudor. Aaaaaaaaaaand the winner is ? Right the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation. ........and not Omega.
You’re reading too much into this. Btw, the only people being fooled are the ones paying $10k (or more) for a $5k dive watch. Enjoy that Rolex that absolutely nobody cares your wearing, but you think everyone does.
Rolex doesn't own Tudor, but they sure as hell make me feel welcome in their store when I go to get my Black Bay serviced.....until you tell them you want to buy a Submariner. Remember that scene from Austin Powers where the bad guys continually laugh? That was them when asking to buy a Submariner.
Did you know all tudor inventory is tracked by rolex sa? The whole tudor backend on inventory control is done by rolex IT. Check some of your sources. The 5612 architecture is based to the 3135 rolex movement. The tudor silicone hairspring is made using rolex semi conductor machines. So they are joined at the hip.
I think the Pelagoes is one of there best offers next to the BB58 and BB36. I believe the Pelagoes has been a bit slightly overlooked But now that some people are starting to really admire it. I think it's very recently become way more popular and will be seen alot more in the coming future. I love the current Rolex Submariner like many do, but it can be a bit cumbersome and heavy etc for smaller wrists and in general so IMHO the Pelagoes serves a purpose and offers a great alternative to a Sub and may as a whole suit more for an everyday wearer for some . I feel like the square indices and hands give more of a subdued look and casual wear. The Rolex is a perfect everyday watch it is more of a luxury looking feeling tool watch and costs considerably more. The Pelagoes imho has purpose just like any good tool watch and I think it's a winner!
I have the Tudor GMT. It’s a great watch if you have about a 7 inch wrist or up. Can wear it anywhere, rugged, lots of presence, charm (had a guy compare it to his dads old Rolex GMT), and 200M dive rating. Perfect sun travel (if we can ever do that again) / all round watch. I’m on wait list Rolex GMT to go with my Air King, not sure what I’ll do with the Tudor if I get it, any Tudor sort of fits a nice spot in a higher end collection as a luxury go anywhere / beater. As to value, I never saw it as a collectible, but I’m glad they hold their value way better than most other watches same price point (eg Breitling / Omega).
Prices inflated by greedy traders. Try selling one privately. My BB GMT took the AD less than a week to get on SS. Chrono 24 et al are selling over retail. I’ve just seen one go locally as a private sale for 25% under 10% discounted retail. One thing posting it over retail another thing shifting it.
@@wozza1 I haven't tried selling any of mine, but looking at various second hand dealers (C&C, Bernard Watch, Bob's Watches, David SW, etc.) You don't see them going for much under retail. Crown and Caliber has 2 Pelagoses (Pelagi?) With box and papers for 20 bucks under retail. Definitely nothing like Breitling.
Nobody says that Rolex owns Tudor but they are both owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation. So Tudor is a sister Co. of Rolex. I think Tudor a great bang for buck. It will keep most people happy that are on a Rolex waiting list or that just want a very good watch at a more reasonable price!
Here in the UK you can buy a black bay enjoy yhe watch look after it and sell it a year later around couple hundred under retail. Great watches. Harrods version will obv be discontinued ar somepoint only one retailer sells that version which could be a worthy long term investment.
@@andymorrow1597 the drop off is very little… not like Breitling which can be bought brand new for nearly half retail. I got a new Superocean for 2500 USD when they retail for $4200. I think the new Black Bay Chronos are going to be hard to find and sell for more than retail. Excellent Daytona alternative.
I purchased a tudor pelagos @ 9 months ago . I was shopping for a rolex batman or sub/date. that about 3 months after another AD - offered me the sub/date . 3 months after that - the original AD offered me a batman. the tudor was my first nice watch - now there is a small group. the tudor is my everyday watch. I think it is great, great color , great lum, great clasp . stay safe & healthy. ~ JDS/CT
Well guys I have bought a BB in red and I wanted this watch and for me it is not a cheap substitute for Rolex. I preferred the Tudor over the Rolex and I still do. With a Tudor on your wrist you still fly under the radar what I like pretty much. But fortunately everyone can go for what he or she wants 👍
Honestly, most people I talk to who own a Tudor (Me included) Have chose it over a Rolex. Rolex feels very dated to me , but Rolex does the same with their watches. Here in Europe you go to an AD and they make you BEG and thats cosidering what I find to be BLOATED prices. Also I cannot speak for the US but here in EUROPE people are still on wait lists for the BB58 it came out in like 2018 (I think) the dark version and you still have to wait for them in the AD. ON the used and Gray market both the Pelagos and BB58 are selling at retail and in some cases even abovde depending where you buy it. Not sure where the concept of them losing their value has come from. I guess considering how disgustingly inflated Rolex is you could compare them but in my oppinion as nice as some Rolexs are they are not worth the price tag and its obvious they over inflate their prices.
@@bighands69 Imagine assuming I cant. I can afford a Rolex. I don't want one is what I was saying by dated. Everything is subjective but to me they look dated some of them now im relation to the current trends. I cant stand the Cyclops eye thing on the date and I think they are quite over priced for what they are. If you're okay paying that power to you.
@@JG-qb9gd One product is better engineered than the other so what other reason would you have not to go with the more expensive product. It is like buying a Toyota over a Lexus.
I think you're probably right - however, I see this as more a problem on the consumer side vs. producer. As I'm sure everyone here knows, Tudor was created to be an accessible luxury level watch - in this regard, nearly the anti-Rolex. If someone is buying a Tudor for exclusivity or future market value based on scarcity, they don't understand what Tudor is all about. In fact, if Tudor started restricting supply of their watches, they would be going against the very reason for their creation. I actually really admire this about Tudor. Rolex is starting to become almost ridiculously expensive and an almost exclusively gray market brand. While I own Rolex watches and love their design and quality, I am turned off by their lack of supply to AD's and would never pay gray market prices for their watches. Thanks Marc!
I don't get why people are turned off by Rolex but then buy Tudors... Tudor profits help Rolex keep doing its crap. Only by voting with your wallet and not buying Tudors or Rolexes will Rolex change...
I found a excellent prince date day with box and papers only to learn that I would have to send my watch across Canada to Toronto to service the watch for around half of the amount I bought the watch for... is there a solution for this? Do I need to have my prince date day that isn't in production serviced by tudor directly or can I take a chance on a watch tech that is local? 😮💨😫 I really want to buy this watch ugh.
Rolex has no issues the market demand is high and they do not want to over supply for a short term hype bubble. They will probably adjust to the demand over time but only if it stays in place.
Agree, rolex has nothin in its current lineup that i like gut I am craving for a bb58. I have to admit that I like the old 36mm Explorers for their looks and history but for the prices they are selling for I have a feeling that I am not getting my money's worth.
@@psmith2632 don't forget to add "IMHO"! You are listing some of the reasons I prefer Tudor. I am not saying you are wrong. It's a matter of personal taste and there is no right or wrong.
I think the black bay & pelagos are beautiful watches! Do you know how much does it cost to service a Tudor? Also, does it get sent out to Swiss or Texas factory if purchased in the U.S.?
That kind of supports the point about real exclusivity being the true influence on price. The Harrods edition is not produced in the same numbers as other models and is not sold in other stores.
As another Chicago area local I can confirm that BB58's are available at most AD's, or at most a few weeks wait if you want them on bracelet. I did get suckered into the 58 Blue hype and was able to buy one first day, but have since replaced it with a Pelagos which fits more of my personal preferences.
Tudor was originally just the more affordable brand these days it's more of a test bed , Tudor did titanium first 70 hour power reserve first and left hand drive first , and several other things . Rolex designs change slowly never wanting to change too much and ruin sales, so things are tried out on Tudor
Exactly. But a certain someone has been brainwashed for years into thinking the Sub is the end all be all watch. Gets rid of a beautiful white Seamaster 300M to have a Sub that looks the same as it always has and that WAAAAAY more people have.
Dude tudor isn't tricking anyone. It is everyone's/social media's misconception about tudor that is playing w the mind of someone trying to buy one bc of perceived image.
I've got both Tudor and Rolex..... Tudor quality is not very far off Rolex I reckon.... (with that said - the Rolex bracelets are better). ... Tudor BB are not that easy to get... and from what I see - the values are not dropping much at all at the greys..
Rolex is a MARKETING company that manufactures wrist watches - it would stand to reason that some of that prowess would at the very least rub off. Even "micro brands" launch trial balloons and adjust the price later on depending on how popular a model is. I love Tudor because it's not Rolex but has a lot of what makes a watch a very good watch.
Only reason I buy a watch is because I love it . Then if I can afford it I buy it new , I don’t worry about resale values as I’ve no intention of selling any watch that I love . Tudor are a great quality brand and well worth their ticket price .
Not true, the black bay 58 black released in 2018 and is still a wait list piece in most ADs on a steel bracelet, looks like Tudor forgot to ship thousands like you said
It’s been said by others in the comments, but this is still true in most places. And more importantly, the Chrono24 etc price on secondary market BB58’s are at or above AD prices.
I foolishly bought a bb58 blue on a whim. I own a new black dial Datejust fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet which I love. I liked the idea of a submariner to complement but realised it'd never get one. The BB58 was released with loads of hype and I thought hmm that might do and rushed to get one. I have no live for this watch at all and have even left the stickers on. Am I best of selling now or is it likely to rise once it's been discontinued years down the line?
I have owned a rolex datejust 41mm and now own a yhatmaster 40 also an omega speedmaster and a tufor gmt . The only one I will never sell is the tudor. I have seen the rolex gmt it is totally different. LOVE THE SNOWFLAKE .
It may be the strategy from Tudor to provide a shortage at the beginning, i said it may be because we have to think in another way that every single new product from different brands and different business, the production line may not be very well to produce it in an acceptable quality. Therefore they need to rectify the production line as well as the suppliers to have the product up to the standard for their customers. That’s why shortage in supply at the beginning. Watch, especially those hand made in house calibre, that even require much much higher quality than we could think of. As the manufacturer needs to ensure the daily tolerance to be within a certain period of seconds, the case and the bracelet must have the same kind of brightness for this batch and the next batch ..... it takes time.
Dude, at least in Greece where I live it’s a real shortage of watches. I went to an A.D and a very reputable A.D in fact and they really did have a shortage of Tudor watches
There is no shortage of a Rolex in the same way there is no shortage of a PlayStation 5. You can get one at any moment. The question is how much are you willing to pay flippers.
Their bracelets make me cringe. All of their marketing is put into one design (black bay) which doesn't hold value. Lastly you put it best "you settle for Tudor". Tudor gmt in the pepsi colors was a big mistake. It simply points out all the intricacy you get with a Rolex that's missing. Rant over lol
@Chong Li Let's face it the company was created to sell to entry level luxury customers who can't afford Rolex. Most companies level up not down ie Toyota/Lexus. Especially seeing as they made identical model variants to Rolex....epic fail! Very unoriginal. Other than the Harrods BB there isn't one model that appreciates. Pretty sad.
Hey Marc I see you pissed off some Tudor fans but I think your analysis is spot on. If you love a Tudor buy it but don’t buy it as a substitute for a Rolex if you do you will probably never get over that you really want a Rolex.
Youre right. Younger folks like the vintage charm. Tudor will target that. And Rolex will cater to both young and old. GS is Seiko. Pulseless, lifeless, boring, sterile. Too 90s dress watch. Tudor still has the Sub Ace in their sleeve. If they rerelease that, watch out.
No ... not 20 or 30 years. I got the BB58 blue in Sept after waiting several months for the Rolex Sub. Then 2 months latter I got the call for a Rolex 126610 and bought it. I like my BB58 more than my Sub.
@Chong Li Implode. The problem with Sieko is, it's Seiko. Great value for the $$$. And differentiating it, from GS is most difficult. They both look like 90s dress watches on the wrist. I love my Excelsior and Flighty for $200 each. That is Seiko's wheelhouse. GS will struggle with Omega and Tudor. Rolex is moving up a weight class. Tudor is absolutely crushing it right now.
There is no "Tudor factory", the Rolex HQ houses Rolex and Tudor's design, assembly and testing. Both brands share the same machines for testing prototypes and sometimes they share the same personnel during high peak production. Tudor has never been an independent company, where in contrast, Rolex was.
Exactly, I pointed out he is misleading viewers 3 weeks ago, he's not admitting his click-bait title and information is wrong, massive fail for this guy. TH-cam keeps serving this up for me though. :(
Neither use a rolex movement ! They have always used Aegler movements A seperate company alltogether since 1879 , Rolex have misled people for a century 😂😂😂😂😂
@@joekelly9369 To be fair, Rolex hasn't always used an Aegler Co. movement either, early Daytona's used both a Valjoux and modified Zenith El Primero movements. Also, Rolex purchased the Aegler company in 2004.
@@ChrisAlvarezAlvarezImaging may have bought their silence in 2004 but the brand was built on aegler movements before the name rolex was a brand , in the uk before the founder moved to switzerland
I have a Tudor Prince black dial manufactured in 83. Sorta like a DateJust 1600. Many Rolex parts on it, crown is a Rolex, Backplate is even all Rolex engraved…got it for 1200$ 5 years ago and now they go for almost twice the price. The factory moved around the mid 80s. So i guess the question is more is it a vintage Tudor or new Tudor? Which the later seem to clearly not cary Rolex parts…
In confused by this video. Looking at a M79230R which has been out for 2-3 years now? Looked at price in eBay and none are really cheaper than MSRP. I think you're just putting alot of efforts into finding an issue that just doesn't exist.
Rolex has never been in short supply. Look on EBay and you will find millions of them. The truth of the matter is that people are sheep and they all want the same thing. Rolex does make a great watch but in no way are they rare.
@@megane230f1 no they aren’t. Stop parroting stuff which misguides people. While PP and others in theory do pay more attention to detail (which you are paying for, and which, under enough magnification, will also show significant mistakes - one in particular on TH-cam compares it to cedor, I believe. Not sure, but I recall watching a video of the sort), it’s not as if Rolex build quality is so inferior. It’s more about precious materials etc, but Rolex is more than good enough. As it should be: at these price points it’s about getting better (as opposed to getting worse): it’s more correct to say that the more you pay the more you get. Rolex build quality is excellent though, and the fact that their watches stand the test of time is testament to that. P.s. I’m not some Rolex fanboy: this is true of many other watch brands at this price point.
@@megane230f1 Rolex make sports watches not detailed dress watches so you cannot say they are behind in build quality. What you should be saying is that Patek puts more detail into their products and charges you more and cannot be compared to a Rolex sports watch.
Tudor GMT has a date wheel issue, that's why there is many of them out there. BB58 black, 3 years later is still 2-3 months wait. You can't get it any time you want, sorry.
They call the new releases “allocation” pieces. Yes you are correct they then flood the market with them. Good example is the BB58 Blue dial. Was super hot and now is on display at every AD I visit. I’d say you can get a 10% discount at minimum
@@seekingthetruth3410 They are very much holding their value. In some cases they are increasing in value a lot. Rolex is a status symbol and thus the over inflated price. If you are a watch geek you buy a BB58 or you start looking at Grand Seiko.
I have had my Tudor blackbay harrods edition 2 years now ....been a great watch ...I'm sure there are plenty around but I have never seen anybody one else wearing one when I'm out and about wearing mine ...feels kind of exclusive to me ...
submariner was always my dream watch, a workhorse with great heritage always wanted to buy ine than I finally got the opportunity and than I found out the black bay 58 bronze needless to say I fell in love I don't care if it wouldn't hold it's value nearly as well as a submariner it looked so special, and you're telling me it would oxidize in a totally unique way only for what watch? it's so beautiful, I rock it every day, and I never regretted my decision to not go with a submariner
“Buy it because you like it “...some of the best advice for any watch collector!
💯
I guess Tudor tricked him into buying 2 of them. Glad he likes them so it's not a total loss.
That must be a new discovery for you. So all you're life you're used to buying what the 'internet' tells you to buy.
No tricks by Tudor. For the money Tudor offers extremely excellent value. It is holding strong and their sports models will climb up in value. Tudor is a very reputable company, delivering a great product.
I rather buy a Seiko. If I want a Rolex, why would I buy a Tudor?
@@bngr_bngr I also want a Porsche but I drive a Seat…I got the best that I can afford.
Seiko is 💩. You can’t compare
@@augustojoseramonpinochetug5235 Seiko MM300 or Grand Seiko.
@@bngr_bngr "I rather buy a Seiko. If I want a Rolex, why would I buy a Tudor?" Because it is an excellent Swiss watch without the games played by Rolex re supply and price.
Rolex Sea Dweller: $16,859. Tudor Pelagos LHD: $4500.00. PLEASE, Tudor, trick me some more!
Got a black bay in black, frankly i couldn't give a s**t, its a superb piece of it's own.
Same here. Also gave a Rolex Explorer. Love both
why pay that much for a ETA?
@@qiranwang because they like the watch? Plus who doesn't love to spend less money on a service and be able to take them to most watch makers out there
You should do your research too. Tudor is Rolex. All the workers in Geneva work for Rolex. There is no Tudor signe on the paycheck. The Tudor 58 is exactly what I would have expected from Rolex in the '90ies. And the retro vibe is breathtaking when you hold her in your hands. Greetz from Lucerne, Switzerland.
I send my tudor pelagos for services get it back with Rolex papers services! So they are one company
Wow, use Google, you will feel extremely stupid for this comment shortly after you read the search results. "Montres Tudor SA, or simply Tudor, is a Swiss watchmaker based in Geneva, Switzerland. Registered in 1926 by Hans Wilsdorf, founder of Rolex, the brand remains a sister company to Rolex; both companies are owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation."
Tudor isn't Rolex.
@@pokie6087 Dang, are you late... I bought me a Certina 300m diver in titanium. Cheers from Lucerne, Switzerland
@@volpiguitar
Saying Rolex is Tudor is like saying Omega is Longines because they are both owned by the Swatch group
“You may never “qualify” to buy that steel Rolex GMT Pepsi” 😂 Rolex has turned their brand into the douchiest for the douchiest among us.
Like Ferrari did a few years back. Some Ferrari dealers will not let you in the showroom unless you can prove you have owned a luxury sports car in the past.
The only word I can use to describe a Rolex "Pepsi" is gauche. Still, we all have different tastes. If (as I suspect) all Rolex indices are made of white gold, I'll never wear any Rolex. Gold is prohibited for a Muslim man (but it's permissible for women) and it's easy to avoid. I do admire Rolex for restricting supply, and actually, I can see the sense in the snootiness of retailers - they want to know that the watch is going to a gentleman. Unfortunately the flip side of that is the "flipping" phenomenon: pre-owned (let's just call it what it is and say secondhand) selling for a price higher than the brand new retail figure! That's madness.
"Buying a Tudor GMT is like buying a Seiko."
Boy Bye.
Rolex dbags are THE WORST
Agree
I wouldn't give Rolex my money , as they think they are more important than the customer,
I get plenty of people asking about my Seiko king samarai which is ten times more affordable than a Rolex list price
Also Seiko do everything in house . From the movement to the bracelet, and here's a crazy idea.
You don't have to qualify for any of their watches even grand Seiko which in my opinion are better built than a Rolex as they are all handmade
Left all this behind a while back, Omega and Grand Seiko man now, and very happy.
Tudor is a sister company to Rolex. Both are owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation. You get a lot more watch for your money when you buy a Tudor rather than an over priced, over hyped Rolex.
No one thinks that Tudor is playing this trick. Only you.
I believe he is spot on
He seems spot on
@@floridaman727 Me 2.
And those people who think like you would be ignorant. Typical of the average sucker who takes everything at face value…🙄
😂😂😂😂😂 best comment in TH-cam history. It’s like he’s explaining something after he read a marketing 101 textbook or marketing for dummies.
I bought a Tudor BB58 and love it. Worth every single penny
Me too. Doesn’t leave my wrist.
Same
“... And no Rolex doesn’t own Tudor.” No, but both are owned and run by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation. So they are very closely related
I’m on the list , is the hype worth it ?
@@weeksy68Oh is there a waiting list again? Which model are you getting? To me, it’s well worth the hype. No question. In fact I even prefer it over the Sub because it’s not luxury in appearance, has a slimmer look, and I love the snowflake hour hand. Plus COSC certified, mine runs -0.4 spd faithfully
Tudor was registered as a company in 1926 by Hans Wilsdorf, the founder of Rolex. Tudor is a sister company of Rolex, and both companies are owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation.
"Rolex shortages are true shortages" - are they made from unobtanium? No. Rolex play the same game as Ferrari - "make on less car than the market wants" They create their own shortages on purpose. Tudor aren't Rolex - I am fairly sure this wont be a revaluation to anyone who subscribes to your channel. What Tudor are is a manufacturer of good quality watches that have a different marketing strategy Rolex - and I am sure a tiny budget in comparison, but they use it smartly, creating demand through reviewers, influencers etc. and then supplying that demand with product in volume - probably every company in the world would see that as sound and smart marketing. "If you get a Tudor you will get hosed" - Mark, maybe take off your Rolex-shaped goggles for a minute and join the real world - most people should buy watches that they love and want to wear, not as a growth investment. If people buy a Rolex (and the tiny % of other brands which appreciate) and put them in a bank vault along with their gold bars, bearer bonds and Fabergé Eggs' that is not watch collecting or hobbying, that is something very different.
Rolex are not playing games. The market demand has grown for particular Rolex watches but they have simply not increased production.
They are a conservative company that does not get carried away with hype. They have seen the market go up and down many times since their founding.
Great comment!
Watches are made by craftsmen. You can't just DOUBLE production simply because the demand doubled. How long do you think it takes to train a watchmaker that makes it by hand? How many people you know want to even go into that field of work? This isn't like accounting or software engineering industry. The supply of labor is extremely rare.
@@MrFraiche Well.... you don't need to be a "watchmaker" to assemble watches... like you don't need to be a mechanic to work in a car factory.
Rolex fired the old watchmaker craftsmen in 2008 and replaced with younger watchmakers as a cost saving, they could employ more if they wanted to. They choose not to.
I prefer Tudor to Rolex. More interesting designs, great value and they still have that association with Rolex.
That association is what gives them the reputation of being the "cheap Rolex wannabe" which is too bad because I like their watches better.
My father asked me : son , brand new rolex submariner or tudor for your birthday ? And i said , dad i want the tudor .
@@juancruz-jg5pq …why? Isn’t the Rolex superior in so many ways…!?! Brand image, resale if needed, exclusivity, perfect one watch collection I’d say
Pre-owned Tudor prices in the USA are now equal to or slightly more than new MSRP. In addition, the build quality is equal to a comparable Rolex model. Tudors are certified chronometers and the GMT has a 70 hour power reserve. The only difference is the grade of stainless- 316 vs. 904, and who among my fellow Rolex/Tudor wearers can detect that difference? I own both so believe me when I say the Tudor is a tremendous value and equal in performance to a Rolex.
Not in uk i just brought a pelagos 42mm 2 months old for £3,000 they retail at £4,100 over here. If you look around all i looked at are well under MSRP. I have 2 rolex , GMT and Deepsea that go for nearly double the retail price which is just stupid
Not now, grey market prices are tumbling, and now that I've heard the new mega Rolex factory is fired up, the guy market prices will continue to fall. I too paid 3k for the LHD Pelagos and love it!@@leekindell9937
Buying a premium watch for investment is the first mistake. With the exception of Rolex and some specific models from other brands most watches fall in value on the secondary market. Even buying a Rolex SS Sport at an elevated secondary market price can be disastrous. Your strategy for waiting out the hype of a new watch introduction is generally correct. That said if you buy a Tudor sport at a decent price you’ll never regret it
I have 2 Rolex watches I also have a Tudor and I have just ordered another Tudor you only lose money if you sell it !! The Tudors are a beautiful watch
Lol what it must be like to view EVERYTHING through rolex colored glasses
Yes, Mark’s obsessed with Rolex value retention.
Elaborate, because everything he saying is true.
@@jiheemvohor9720 No. The BB58 is not selling like a Breitling and it's been out for almost three years.
@@DannyKaffee thanks, cause I was like 🤔
@@jiheemvohor9720 Rolex phist Marc on Reg basis
I've never ever wanted a rolex but I brought a tudor
There can be only one ⚔️
Where did you bring it from?
Rolex is a status symbol if you're a watch nerd and love watches tudor is VERY interesting.
For the longest time I had no idea about Tudor's relationship with Rolex. I genuinely liked the black bay. So I bought it :)
The same group that owns Rolex owns Tudor. So while it's technically true that Rolex doesn't own Tudor, they are sister companies owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation. So saying Rolex doesn't own Tudor is a matter of semantics.
True. Like equating GM owns Cadillac and Ford owns Lincoln. For all intents and purposes It’s correct to say. One could say Tudor owns Rolex…. In my mind the best way to think is certainly they are owned by the same company.
Totally agree with you. I have two Tudors and I bought them because I bloody love them. That’s how it should be!
the same here, have a ranger, the new P01, and now a reverse Panda on order....
I agree I have two tutors didn’t buy them as an investment. Will probably pull the trigger on the BB 54 because I like the watch a lot. Making money out of my watches it is not going to happen and I know that.
You can get a Rolex, any model anytime, you just gotta pay more!
Had Rolex’s, don’t give the bastards your money and buy an Omega! They are far better watches too.
And cheaper!
Coaxiel movement...much more interesting!
To the extent maintenance matters, Tudors are serviced at Rolex service centers in the USA.
I sold my submariner because I felt uncomfortable wearing it. I realized my pelagos never left my wrist. Very understated and flies under the radar easily. Bought it used for a 3500.
Why did you feel uncomfortable?
@@MrMatt1923 because it’s a lot of watch to wear. Anything that’s says Rolex is such a statement piece. Some of us work jobs that make that uncomfortable. I’m in sales and wearing a Rolex can at times make the customer feel uncomfortable. You should never act like you make more money than them.
@@floridaman727 I agree to that. I’m selective where I wear my Sub.
@@floridaman727 You must be a fantastic salesman. You think way ahead of the game.
@@floridaman727 exactly my point. I have Rolex, Tudor, Breitling and Oris… I am also a Sales Executive and I basically never use my sub, because it catch so much unwanted attention and some customers feels intimidated by it.
You can't blame Tudor for a person's lack of self control.
Like cocaine
@@jtwu8931 hahaha...
I remember the day when you would purchase a watch to wear it, not to flaunt it. Yea most buy Tudor because they can’t get Rolex. But some but just because we want it. My Pelagos is 7 years old now and has never left my wrist. And I don’t consider it a Rolex in any way. I actually prefer it over the Rolex brand. Tudor is now what Rolex was 20 years ago.
Fairly accurate analysis except that you missed mentioning an important point in my opinion. Tudor watches end up on the grey market not because their previous owners were unhappy or dissatisfied. They end up there because their previous owners got hooked on luxury watches and upgraded. They are entry level luxury watches and nothing gets you motivated to jump into the luxury watch market like a Tudor.
Spot on!!
no if you want to buy your first Rolex they ask for a buying history and dealers offer to sell you a Tudor first and buyers dump these on the grey market most of the time unused
I bought my BB58 black because I really liked it and is great bang per buck for a in house movement watch. I own Rolex and Omega and my BB58 gets the most wrist time..
Exactly the same thing here, have the new blue bb58 and it’s worn more than Rolex, omega and Panerai.
And same here. I have a GMT II, and my 58 gets twice the wear. I prefer the 58 case over the maxi-case also
@@patrickr6297 Totally agree with you. The BB58 is a damn good watch. Money well spent.
@@PatrykEspinosa Yes.. It totally grows on you.. It certainly has with me..
Bought a blue BB58 instead of a Seamaster and very glad I did - much better wearability
I doubt anyone thinks Tudor is a Rolex, however a properly kept Tudor or any good quality watch that for a while has a name for it will rise in value when the model gets discontinued, and they do after 5-15 years, so enjoy your good quality watch for long term since that is why you bought it in the first place. Don't flip like a stock market share. Happy new everyone, enjoy while you have them and be grateful for having them 😊.
It’s the best watch for the price tag of under $6k. And it is definitely owned by Rolex.
@Silver Fox So it's pretty safe to say that in practicality they own Tudor? In which case the reasons people mention that Rolex "owns" Tudor still stand. Meaning it sort of doesn't matter to correct people.
10:29 you 100% have this right! Thank you for your honesty and candidness. Super informational video.
That's the whole trick :
What does a guy buy when he has alot of money burning a hole in his pocket and he can't get no Rolex ?
Right an Omega
So here comes Tudor in the game.
They create a little bit of the Rolex Aura arround their New models and tadaa our guy with the burning money in his pocket buys a Tudor.
Aaaaaaaaaaand the winner is ?
Right the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation.
........and not Omega.
Great point 👍
You’re reading too much into this. Btw, the only people being fooled are the ones paying $10k (or more) for a $5k dive watch. Enjoy that Rolex that absolutely nobody cares your wearing, but you think everyone does.
cost and value morons
I don't care what anyone thinks about what's on my wrist. Buddy, they're just watches. No need to be a little bitch about it.
@@jonirwin7316 I’m with you mate. I can’t afford a nice watch either. I’m happy with my SKX.
@@tylerdurden237 an SKX is a really fine watch!
That’s an awesome reply reminds me of people I know that do that flaunt their submariners like they in Bill Gates league hhh snob wannabes.
Rolex doesn't own Tudor, but they sure as hell make me feel welcome in their store when I go to get my Black Bay serviced.....until you tell them you want to buy a Submariner. Remember that scene from Austin Powers where the bad guys continually laugh? That was them when asking to buy a Submariner.
Did you know all tudor inventory is tracked by rolex sa? The whole tudor backend on inventory control is done by rolex IT. Check some of your sources. The 5612 architecture is based to the 3135 rolex movement. The tudor silicone hairspring is made using rolex semi conductor machines. So they are joined at the hip.
I think the Pelagoes is one of there best offers next to the BB58 and BB36. I believe the Pelagoes has been a bit slightly overlooked But now that some people are starting to really admire it. I think it's very recently become way more popular and will be seen alot more in the coming future. I love the current Rolex Submariner like many do, but it can be a bit cumbersome and heavy etc for smaller wrists and in general so IMHO the Pelagoes serves a purpose and offers a great alternative to a Sub and may as a whole suit more for an everyday wearer for some . I feel like the square indices and hands give more of a subdued look and casual wear. The Rolex is a perfect everyday watch it is more of a luxury looking feeling tool watch and costs considerably more. The Pelagoes imho has purpose just like any good tool watch and I think it's a winner!
I just pulled the trigger on a BB58 Blue today. I'm smitten as a kitten!
Thats why I wear an Oris
I have the Tudor GMT. It’s a great watch if you have about a 7 inch wrist or up. Can wear it anywhere, rugged, lots of presence, charm (had a guy compare it to his dads old Rolex GMT), and 200M dive rating. Perfect sun travel (if we can ever do that again) / all round watch. I’m on wait list Rolex GMT to go with my Air King, not sure what I’ll do with the Tudor if I get it, any Tudor sort of fits a nice spot in a higher end collection as a luxury go anywhere / beater. As to value, I never saw it as a collectible, but I’m glad they hold their value way better than most other watches same price point (eg Breitling / Omega).
Go look at used Tudor prices. They are holding up.
Prices inflated by greedy traders. Try selling one privately. My BB GMT took the AD less than a week to get on SS. Chrono 24 et al are selling over retail. I’ve just seen one go locally as a private sale for 25% under 10% discounted retail. One thing posting it over retail another thing shifting it.
@@wozza1 I haven't tried selling any of mine, but looking at various second hand dealers (C&C, Bernard Watch, Bob's Watches, David SW, etc.) You don't see them going for much under retail. Crown and Caliber has 2 Pelagoses (Pelagi?) With box and papers for 20 bucks under retail. Definitely nothing like Breitling.
I bought my burgundy from govberg jewelers for 2700 including tax month old last year price went up
Nobody says that Rolex owns Tudor but they are both owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation. So Tudor is a sister Co. of Rolex. I think Tudor a great bang for buck. It will keep most people happy that are on a Rolex waiting list or that just want a very good watch at a more reasonable price!
I don’t agree with your statement that the prices drop hard on the secondary/used markets... they are definitely holding their value.
Here in the UK you can buy a black bay enjoy yhe watch look after it and sell it a year later around couple hundred under retail. Great watches. Harrods version will obv be discontinued ar somepoint only one retailer sells that version which could be a worthy long term investment.
@@andymorrow1597 the drop off is very little… not like Breitling which can be bought brand new for nearly half retail. I got a new Superocean for 2500 USD when they retail for $4200. I think the new Black Bay Chronos are going to be hard to find and sell for more than retail. Excellent Daytona alternative.
@@Andrewtimoni I have my eye on the black bay 2 tone chrono either that or the all steel version with steel bezel
They aren’t owned by Rolex but they are a sister company which both companies are owned by the same foundation
We buy Tudor watches because the are great in quality and the price,,,,
There is no trick
I went to an official dealer and there is still waiting lists for the now 2 year old gmt and the regular black bay
Why not buy an Omega(better preowned at very good price) instead of Tudor if you don’t want to wait for a Rolex or pay a premium for it?
I own an Omega Seamaster GMT 50th Anniversary from new 20 years ago. I'd still like to own a Black Bay.
I purchased a tudor pelagos @ 9 months ago . I was shopping for a rolex batman or sub/date. that about 3 months after another AD - offered me the sub/date . 3 months after that - the original AD offered me a batman. the tudor was my first nice watch - now there is a small group. the tudor is my everyday watch. I think it is great, great color , great lum, great clasp . stay safe & healthy. ~ JDS/CT
Well guys I have bought a BB in red and I wanted this watch and for me it is not a cheap substitute for Rolex. I preferred the Tudor over the Rolex and I still do. With a Tudor on your wrist you still fly under the radar what I like pretty much. But fortunately everyone can go for what he or she wants 👍
Honestly, most people I talk to who own a Tudor (Me included) Have chose it over a Rolex. Rolex feels very dated to me , but Rolex does the same with their watches. Here in Europe you go to an AD and they make you BEG and thats cosidering what I find to be BLOATED prices. Also I cannot speak for the US but here in EUROPE people are still on wait lists for the BB58 it came out in like 2018 (I think) the dark version and you still have to wait for them in the AD. ON the used and Gray market both the Pelagos and BB58 are selling at retail and in some cases even abovde depending where you buy it. Not sure where the concept of them losing their value has come from. I guess considering how disgustingly inflated Rolex is you could compare them but in my oppinion as nice as some Rolexs are they are not worth the price tag and its obvious they over inflate their prices.
@@JG-qb9gd
They are not dated you just cannot afford a Rolex.
@@bighands69 Imagine assuming I cant. I can afford a Rolex. I don't want one is what I was saying by dated. Everything is subjective but to me they look dated some of them now im relation to the current trends. I cant stand the Cyclops eye thing on the date and I think they are quite over priced for what they are. If you're okay paying that power to you.
@@JG-qb9gd
One product is better engineered than the other so what other reason would you have not to go with the more expensive product.
It is like buying a Toyota over a Lexus.
I am living in Poland, we have to wait more than year for Tudor Pepsi GMT, so maybe something changed.
I think you're probably right - however, I see this as more a problem on the consumer side vs. producer. As I'm sure everyone here knows, Tudor was created to be an accessible luxury level watch - in this regard, nearly the anti-Rolex. If someone is buying a Tudor for exclusivity or future market value based on scarcity, they don't understand what Tudor is all about. In fact, if Tudor started restricting supply of their watches, they would be going against the very reason for their creation. I actually really admire this about Tudor. Rolex is starting to become almost ridiculously expensive and an almost exclusively gray market brand. While I own Rolex watches and love their design and quality, I am turned off by their lack of supply to AD's and would never pay gray market prices for their watches. Thanks Marc!
I don't get why people are turned off by Rolex but then buy Tudors... Tudor profits help Rolex keep doing its crap. Only by voting with your wallet and not buying Tudors or Rolexes will Rolex change...
the word rolex scribed onto the piece cost an additional 100k lmao that is the trick.
I sent my Tudor away to get serviced. It came back with Rolex service papers.
I found a excellent prince date day with box and papers only to learn that I would have to send my watch across Canada to Toronto to service the watch for around half of the amount I bought the watch for... is there a solution for this? Do I need to have my prince date day that isn't in production serviced by tudor directly or can I take a chance on a watch tech that is local? 😮💨😫 I really want to buy this watch ugh.
It's funny that tudor doesn't have manufacturing constraints during a pandemic but Rolex somehow has problems...
Yes because the demand is the same .....
Rolex plays a game with customers... also Tudor does have a shortage on BB58's at least here in europe.
@@JG-qb9gd I just bought a bb58 yesterday it was the 1st one the ad has gotten in since thanksgiving, at least that’s what they told me.
Rolex has no issues the market demand is high and they do not want to over supply for a short term hype bubble.
They will probably adjust to the demand over time but only if it stays in place.
@@thegraciefighter102 that's a good point
My BB41 is my exit watch. I love it so much. Tudor forever 🖤
I personally think Tudor watches are better looking than Rolex.
Agree, rolex has nothin in its current lineup that i like gut I am craving for a bb58.
I have to admit that I like the old 36mm Explorers for their looks and history but for the prices they are selling for I have a feeling that I am not getting my money's worth.
Black protruding crown tube, big crown, aluminium bezel, riveted bracelet, 316L steel, coin edged bezel does not look better than any Rolex.
I do love the coin edge bezel on my Tudors. Ok no one does bezels better than Rolex but the Tudor bezel is also a thing of beauty.
@@psmith2632 don't forget to add "IMHO"! You are listing some of the reasons I prefer Tudor. I am not saying you are wrong. It's a matter of personal taste and there is no right or wrong.
I think the black bay & pelagos are beautiful watches! Do you know how much does it cost to service a Tudor? Also, does it get sent out to Swiss or Texas factory if purchased in the U.S.?
The Harrods special edition is still selling at a premium pre owned.
That kind of supports the point about real exclusivity being the true influence on price. The Harrods edition is not produced in the same numbers as other models and is not sold in other stores.
Still has a butter face….
Marc, how do you feel about Jomashop?
Bought from them twice. Flawless transactions.
As another Chicago area local I can confirm that BB58's are available at most AD's, or at most a few weeks wait if you want them on bracelet. I did get suckered into the 58 Blue hype and was able to buy one first day, but have since replaced it with a Pelagos which fits more of my personal preferences.
Tudor was originally just the more affordable brand these days it's more of a test bed , Tudor did titanium first 70 hour power reserve first and left hand drive first , and several other things . Rolex designs change slowly never wanting to change too much and ruin sales, so things are tried out on Tudor
I have 1 Omega and 1 Hamilton, but 4 Tissots. They are amazing pieces. All automatic watches. Tissot is the way to go in my humble opinion
Do they have a production number?
Marc, no one tricks me into buying anything.
Exactly. But a certain someone has been brainwashed for years into thinking the Sub is the end all be all watch. Gets rid of a beautiful white Seamaster 300M to have a Sub that looks the same as it always has and that WAAAAAY more people have.
Dude tudor isn't tricking anyone. It is everyone's/social media's misconception about tudor that is playing w the mind of someone trying to buy one bc of perceived image.
The strategy works apparently. My 2 watch collection consists of one Tudor and one Rolex.
Have you tried getting the Black Bay chrono Panda lately?
I've got both Tudor and Rolex..... Tudor quality is not very far off Rolex I reckon.... (with that said - the Rolex bracelets are better).
... Tudor BB are not that easy to get... and from what I see - the values are not dropping much at all at the greys..
Agree. I own both the OG BB58 and Explorer 214270. In my opinion, The only thing that the Explorer better than the BB58 is the LOOK of the bracelet.
Rolex is a MARKETING company that manufactures wrist watches - it would stand to reason that some of that prowess would at the very least rub off. Even "micro brands" launch trial balloons and adjust the price later on depending on how popular a model is. I love Tudor because it's not Rolex but has a lot of what makes a watch a very good watch.
Bought my BB41 used from a trusted source used. Love it.
Only reason I buy a watch is because I love it . Then if I can afford it I buy it new , I don’t worry about resale values as I’ve no intention of selling any watch that I love .
Tudor are a great quality brand and well worth their ticket price .
A slow rollout fixes the bugs, plus i think the bb58 are still pretty hard to find
No, Rolex doesn't own Tudor! But the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation owns both because Mr. Wilsdorf created/invented both brands.
Not true, the black bay 58 black released in 2018 and is still a wait list piece in most ADs on a steel bracelet, looks like Tudor forgot to ship thousands like you said
It’s been said by others in the comments, but this is still true in most places. And more importantly, the Chrono24 etc price on secondary market BB58’s are at or above AD prices.
I foolishly bought a bb58 blue on a whim. I own a new black dial Datejust fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet which I love. I liked the idea of a submariner to complement but realised it'd never get one. The BB58 was released with loads of hype and I thought hmm that might do and rushed to get one. I have no live for this watch at all and have even left the stickers on. Am I best of selling now or is it likely to rise once it's been discontinued years down the line?
Rolex doesn’t make its own hands.
I have owned a rolex datejust 41mm and now own a yhatmaster 40 also an omega speedmaster and a tufor gmt . The only one I will never sell is the tudor. I have seen the rolex gmt it is totally different. LOVE THE SNOWFLAKE
.
Other than the fact is is as thick as a puck
It may be the strategy from Tudor to provide a shortage at the beginning, i said it may be because we have to think in another way that every single new product from different brands and different business, the production line may not be very well to produce it in an acceptable quality. Therefore they need to rectify the production line as well as the suppliers to have the product up to the standard for their customers. That’s why shortage in supply at the beginning. Watch, especially those hand made in house calibre, that even require much much higher quality than we could think of. As the manufacturer needs to ensure the daily tolerance to be within a certain period of seconds, the case and the bracelet must have the same kind of brightness for this batch and the next batch ..... it takes time.
Dude, at least in Greece where I live it’s a real shortage of watches. I went to an A.D and a very reputable A.D in fact and they really did have a shortage of Tudor watches
It’s called ‘marketing’! 🤣
Do you have this right??? I think yes, probably.
There is no shortage of a Rolex in the same way there is no shortage of a PlayStation 5.
You can get one at any moment. The question is how much are you willing to pay flippers.
Their bracelets make me cringe. All of their marketing is put into one design (black bay) which doesn't hold value. Lastly you put it best "you settle for Tudor". Tudor gmt in the pepsi colors was a big mistake. It simply points out all the intricacy you get with a Rolex that's missing. Rant over lol
@Chong Li Let's face it the company was created to sell to entry level luxury customers who can't afford Rolex. Most companies level up not down ie Toyota/Lexus. Especially seeing as they made identical model variants to Rolex....epic fail! Very unoriginal. Other than the Harrods BB there isn't one model that appreciates. Pretty sad.
Offer me a Submariner straight up for my BB58. I will decline.
Hey Marc I see you pissed off some Tudor fans but I think your analysis is spot on. If you love a Tudor buy it but don’t buy it as a substitute for a Rolex if you do you will probably never get over that you really want a Rolex.
Young people will get used to wearing Tudors and will have an attachment to them and in 20 or 30 years they will be wanting Tudors, not Rolexes.
Youre right.
Younger folks like the vintage charm. Tudor will target that. And Rolex will cater to both young and old.
GS is Seiko. Pulseless, lifeless, boring, sterile. Too 90s dress watch.
Tudor still has the Sub Ace in their sleeve. If they rerelease that, watch out.
No ... not 20 or 30 years. I got the BB58 blue in Sept after waiting several months for the Rolex Sub. Then 2 months latter I got the call for a Rolex 126610 and bought it. I like my BB58 more than my Sub.
Tudor subs from 20 or 30 years ago are worth almost as much as their Rolex counterparts.
@@brandonnickerson8934 Yes. I hope so. That will have Omega and GS shaking in their boots.
@Chong Li
Implode.
The problem with Sieko is, it's Seiko. Great value for the $$$. And differentiating it, from GS is most difficult. They both look like 90s dress watches on the wrist. I love my Excelsior and Flighty for $200 each. That is Seiko's wheelhouse. GS will struggle with Omega and Tudor. Rolex is moving up a weight class. Tudor is absolutely crushing it right now.
I went to buy a Rolex they didn’t have any for sale so I went to a different shop and bought a jager lecoultre reverso
There is no "Tudor factory", the Rolex HQ houses Rolex and Tudor's design, assembly and testing. Both brands share the same machines for testing prototypes and sometimes they share the same personnel during high peak production. Tudor has never been an independent company, where in contrast, Rolex was.
Exactly, I pointed out he is misleading viewers 3 weeks ago, he's not admitting his click-bait title and information is wrong, massive fail for this guy. TH-cam keeps serving this up for me though. :(
Neither use a rolex movement ! They have always used Aegler movements A seperate company alltogether since 1879 , Rolex have misled people for a century 😂😂😂😂😂
@@joekelly9369 To be fair, Rolex hasn't always used an Aegler Co. movement either, early Daytona's used both a Valjoux and modified Zenith El Primero movements. Also, Rolex purchased the Aegler company in 2004.
@@ChrisAlvarezAlvarezImaging may have bought their silence in 2004 but the brand was built on aegler movements before the name rolex was a brand , in the uk before the founder moved to switzerland
My Tudor BB S&G is my fav watch, so far. I own two rolex...
I have a Tudor Prince black dial manufactured in 83. Sorta like a DateJust 1600. Many Rolex parts on it, crown is a Rolex, Backplate is even all Rolex engraved…got it for 1200$ 5 years ago and now they go for almost twice the price. The factory moved around the mid 80s. So i guess the question is more is it a vintage Tudor or new Tudor? Which the later seem to clearly not cary Rolex parts…
The first Tudor black bay bronze is my favorite Tudor!
In confused by this video. Looking at a M79230R which has been out for 2-3 years now? Looked at price in eBay and none are really cheaper than MSRP.
I think you're just putting alot of efforts into finding an issue that just doesn't exist.
Rolex has never been in short supply. Look on EBay and you will find millions of them. The truth of the matter is that people are sheep and they all want the same thing. Rolex does make a great watch but in no way are they rare.
rolexes are way behind patek phillipe and a.lange & sohne for build quality
@@megane230f1 no they aren’t. Stop parroting stuff which misguides people. While PP and others in theory do pay more attention to detail (which you are paying for, and which, under enough magnification, will also show significant mistakes - one in particular on TH-cam compares it to cedor, I believe. Not sure, but I recall watching a video of the sort), it’s not as if Rolex build quality is so inferior. It’s more about precious materials etc, but Rolex is more than good enough. As it should be: at these price points it’s about getting better (as opposed to getting worse): it’s more correct to say that the more you pay the more you get. Rolex build quality is excellent though, and the fact that their watches stand the test of time is testament to that.
P.s. I’m not some Rolex fanboy: this is true of many other watch brands at this price point.
@@megane230f1
Rolex make sports watches not detailed dress watches so you cannot say they are behind in build quality.
What you should be saying is that Patek puts more detail into their products and charges you more and cannot be compared to a Rolex sports watch.
I bought a Pelagos, brand spanking new at 20% off. I paid retail for a Rolex and didn’t even ask for a discount.
Tudor GMT has a date wheel issue, that's why there is many of them out there. BB58 black, 3 years later is still 2-3 months wait. You can't get it any time you want, sorry.
They call the new releases “allocation” pieces. Yes you are correct they then flood the market with them. Good example is the BB58 Blue dial. Was super hot and now is on display at every AD I visit. I’d say you can get a 10% discount at minimum
Used Tudor watches are defo holding majority of initial value.
Rolex is over priced, the Sports models are crap for the money,Omega is hands down far superior to Rolex.
@@seekingthetruth3410 They are very much holding their value. In some cases they are increasing in value a lot. Rolex is a status symbol and thus the over inflated price. If you are a watch geek you buy a BB58 or you start looking at Grand Seiko.
I have had my Tudor blackbay harrods edition 2 years now ....been a great watch ...I'm sure there are plenty around but I have never seen anybody one else wearing one when I'm out and about wearing mine ...feels kind of exclusive to me ...
submariner was always my dream watch, a workhorse with great heritage
always wanted to buy ine
than I finally got the opportunity
and than I found out the black bay 58 bronze
needless to say I fell in love
I don't care if it wouldn't hold it's value nearly as well as a submariner
it looked so special, and you're telling me it would oxidize in a totally unique way only for what watch?
it's so beautiful, I rock it every day, and I never regretted my decision to not go with a submariner
❤ my Tudor Blackbay
I have a Pelagos and BB Steel.. both together still not half the price of a grey market sub!
Na in fact most even used sell at AD price.
Do you know if Rolex and Tudor share the same marketing team ? If they don’t they should.