I have a feeling that Arthur is going to be much like Ragnar, and not part of this cav cycle. I could be wrong, but it’s a strange feeling. I mean, if he was, wouldn’t we know the cav rally too? I feel like this is almost like the adversary commander to Ragnar. But again, I could be wrong… I’m just speculating. Why would inf get a commander outside of gen, and cavs and archers don’t? But either way, I’m pumped as fck for him 😎
So many variables to it bro 😭😭😂😂😂 I’m struggling too, but I think I’m settled on Arthur and Philip for ramsses and Freddy. I’m currently investing in a cav march, so Arthur is perfect, then I’ll be running LC/Alex, scipio/ragnar, ZL/Hermann, Phil/Ashur, and then whoever I decide to pair with Arthur, probably Nevsky 🤔 That seems like a really solid 5 march Edit: I’m a little nervous about Nevsky because he’s so old. But the synergy seems INCREDIBLE with the 60% bonus to skill damage on Arthur’s skill pop, plus the 45% defense reduction, and all the other nice bonuses.
@@GrowmietheGreen I'm thinking philip and either ragnar or herman for the swap. I'm runnin LC/alex guan/scippy nev/joan and zhuge ysg. i have 800 heads as well so i'd use those on arthur as long as he wors well after test . That would let me run LC/alex guan/scippy nev/joan zhuge/ herman and philip/arthur
You mean on inscriptions? I mean, they’re both really good. I typically will go with the greater stat. So like, example, I’ll keep 1.7% all damage over say 2.3% health. Now, if the health is over 3%, I’ll keep it unless I roll like a 1.9, or 2% all damage. Edit: I will say, I do tend to prefer health over all damage on my archers, but I still use the same principle. I like survivability in the field vs more damage, in consideration of how hard archers are often targeted.
After 5 years…. Im making a cav march… lol
Both of you is my favorite rok youtuber
Christmas came a bit late for us cav players but the wait was worth it 1000% I would say
I have a feeling that Arthur is going to be much like Ragnar, and not part of this cav cycle. I could be wrong, but it’s a strange feeling. I mean, if he was, wouldn’t we know the cav rally too? I feel like this is almost like the adversary commander to Ragnar. But again, I could be wrong… I’m just speculating. Why would inf get a commander outside of gen, and cavs and archers don’t? But either way, I’m pumped as fck for him 😎
I'm aware you just did one 2 weeks ago, but you should do a best 5 march setup for all of us who are completely torn on who to swap for lol
So many variables to it bro 😭😭😂😂😂 I’m struggling too, but I think I’m settled on Arthur and Philip for ramsses and Freddy. I’m currently investing in a cav march, so Arthur is perfect, then I’ll be running LC/Alex, scipio/ragnar, ZL/Hermann, Phil/Ashur, and then whoever I decide to pair with Arthur, probably Nevsky 🤔 That seems like a really solid 5 march
Edit: I’m a little nervous about Nevsky because he’s so old. But the synergy seems INCREDIBLE with the 60% bonus to skill damage on Arthur’s skill pop, plus the 45% defense reduction, and all the other nice bonuses.
@@GrowmietheGreen I'm thinking philip and either ragnar or herman for the swap. I'm runnin LC/alex guan/scippy nev/joan and zhuge ysg. i have 800 heads as well so i'd use those on arthur as long as he wors well after test . That would let me run LC/alex guan/scippy nev/joan zhuge/ herman and philip/arthur
Might Justinians 4th skill come into play paired with Arthur?
LANCE PRIME
What is better to have all damage or health?
You mean on inscriptions? I mean, they’re both really good. I typically will go with the greater stat. So like, example, I’ll keep 1.7% all damage over say 2.3% health. Now, if the health is over 3%, I’ll keep it unless I roll like a 1.9, or 2% all damage.
Edit: I will say, I do tend to prefer health over all damage on my archers, but I still use the same principle. I like survivability in the field vs more damage, in consideration of how hard archers are often targeted.