This bucket tilt problem has been around sinc early 90's models in 300 series. I have it in my 300-seriers. My usual procedure to load full 300 liter load of sand/dirt is taking several smaller carvings, then raising the boom, shaking it a bit and then another. I dont see it as a design flaw, I think it is intentional though irritating. When moving around with overfilled bucket boom needs to raised a bit to get bucket levelled, which makes the tiny loader a bit akward to drive if not driven in flat ground. I suggest good rear weights, either in wheels (I think Avant still sells these) or rear bumber weight (dunno does 200 series have this option). 200 is a work donkey, it really helps local carrying and lifting and saves from back pain. Just thinking aloud.
Skid loaders have horrible tilt back. You are better to back drag the pile having a loose pile that will fill the back of the bucket the front will take care of itself
This bucket tilt problem has been around sinc early 90's models in 300 series. I have it in my 300-seriers. My usual procedure to load full 300 liter load of sand/dirt is taking several smaller carvings, then raising the boom, shaking it a bit and then another. I dont see it as a design flaw, I think it is intentional though irritating. When moving around with overfilled bucket boom needs to raised a bit to get bucket levelled, which makes the tiny loader a bit akward to drive if not driven in flat ground. I suggest good rear weights, either in wheels (I think Avant still sells these) or rear bumber weight (dunno does 200 series have this option). 200 is a work donkey, it really helps local carrying and lifting and saves from back pain. Just thinking aloud.
The angle is designed in to make it harder to overload the bucket and lift the back.
How about the High tip bucket ？
Skid loaders have horrible tilt back. You are better to back drag the pile having a loose pile that will fill the back of the bucket the front will take care of itself