Police department’s complaint system, internal review and investigation, district attorneys and lower courts have all become irrelevant. There is a conflict of interest there that if they rule in the favor of the complaining citizen then it gives evidence for the person to sue monetarily and expose their corruption. So automatically they’re always going to rule against the person and hope that stops them from going any further. You have to just assume that no matter what you’re going to have to go to a higher court that is hopefully not corrupt also.
Fantastic video that again shows the ignorance and arrogance of LE today in 2022. It typifies that LEO's will always fall back upon Qualified Immunity. Qualified immunity lets the police off the hook for misconduct and denies their victims compensation. Police unions claim that qualified immunity exists to protect police officers who play by the rules. But it does the exact opposite. Qualified immunity only protects officials who have broken the law.
@@Sweetyhide In states like California and Texas you must be arrested. You can be detained for reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime but do not have to identify. In some states it’s when you’re detained that you must id but they must have reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime to detain you in the first place.
Man that was powerful how that young man stated that too many people have died for those rights just for me to give them up because law-enforcement shows up man that was heavy loved it🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY IMMEDIATELY. We should be able to sue these cops personally. Start draining their pension when they violate our rights. Why should the taxpayers foot the bill for their inept policing. Colorado and a few other states ended qualified immunity. It’s time all 50 states to end it.
Qualified Immunity is not the main problem. Terry v. Ohio SCOTUS case is the main nullification cops use against citizens to fleece them daily. Qualified Immunity (when applicable) is an after thought. Reverse Terry v. Ohio and the excuse to begin thousands of interactions would disappear over night. Without Terry v. Ohio the "Officer Safety" excuse to nullify rights would cease to exist thus the police would not be able to interact unless they had "Probable Cause". Right now police will manufacture their reason under "suspicious behavior" and attempt to create the narrative of probable cause just like they did with this case. Let's not forget that this case passed through the lower courts showing that the criminal activities go from the officers in the field all the way up through the prosecutor and local magistrate (judge). Most would not have the ability to show this level of blatant impunity exists because the costs associated with hiring an attorney to navigate a case like this is almost 100K or more. This case is an absolute service to the public and the Pro Bono lawyer who helped is a legal hero!
Qualified immunity still exist in Colorado and New Mexico. There are two separate courts here, state and federal. Most civil rights suits are federal suits. The Colorado law for example doesn't exactly end QI it just changes it. In fact it works out good for the officer because his liability is limited to $25,000 the rest is on the city. The city can also indemnify the officer, assuming liability on behalf of the officer. Haven't looked into New Mexico. However I 100% agree with the prior comment regarding RAS as a more significant issue as it is what gives the officer the authority to violate rights as we so frequently see. QI doesn't apply to criminal charges and in fact once convicted QI is a much lower hurdle to overcome. One option we might consider is using grand juries to allow citizens to bring criminal complaint against public officials. An indictment would then mandate the state prosecute the crime. Why should we burden the individual to police the police by financial cost. Let's have the state use our taxes to police the police. An alternative would be to allow for a private or special prosecutor at state expense who would not have the same conflict of interest with a local police department. QI will always exist to some extent, it should never be what the courts have made it into but it will always exist. Just some thoughts
@@Ghettoize it's also time to stop them investigating themselves also. The day that happens is the day your see thousands of vermin tyrant's run for the hills. FTP.
This stops when cops start having to pay for the lawsuit out of pocket. Period. When the ignorant thugs learn it costs them actual consequences instead of a two week paid vacation, this ignorance and ego trip is very short.
@@nightcross1030 municipalities already pay the price. By tax funded lawsuit settlements. That needs to stop and let the officers pay for it out of pocket themselves. Or require them to carry liability insurance and when they get too expensive and get dropped they get desk duty only.
It shocks me that there are so many police that think following their own policy to identify applies to a private citizen. Are they that stupid, or just disingenuous?
Poorly educated, low cognition and led by even poorer example. Part of this is the case law--Jordan v New London where the court said (in effect) that police are free to set their own hiring standards.
It’s because of how police are trained. They’re trained to get all the info they need for their report. What information the report consists of varies from department to department. Here in America, we don’t train our police force to know the laws they swore to uphold, instead we train them how to fill out paperwork…
LOL Do you really think that American soldiers have recently fought for "our rights"?? They fight for the rich globalists banksters that are destroying America.
The fact that no matter how many times the lower courts get it wrong, there are no repercussions is a big part of the problem. Maybe there should be a three strike rule for judges.
@@francoisbouvier7861 short answer alot ... they just run a racket in small towns I remember I jade a dui which was a false arrest but the judge would not let me represent myself only would talk to me if I hired a lawyer then after I did my lawyer walked in shopk the judges hand came over to said your good it's going to be dropped just make sure you pay me and your good . Wtf
Yes, it seems like a fairly easy and open and shut case there was no reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime committed the officers didn't even make up a fake one and they had no right to check his ID, it was funny how the appeals court judge took what seemed like 10 seconds to reversely magistrate judges decision, this shows clear and present corruption amongst the Magistrate Court as well as the entire police department and police chief, he should be able to very easily Sue not only the Magister judge or magistrate court but as well the entire police department as well as the police chief they should all be stripped of their qualified immunity because they very clearly did not follow the law and negligence of the law is not a defense.... Tired of these damn feelings police
@@Smashmilk if you truly felt it was a false arrest keep pushing higher.take out that Loan etc city state county will pay lawyer fees after negotiations. So yeah.
@@terrycoontz "take out that Loan etc city state county will pay lawyer fees after negotiations." /// You make it sound so simple. Yes, they might pay. If he wins. Eventually. Years from now. Until then he'll have to pay on that loan, assuming he can afford it. What if he's supposed to be saving to put his kids through college? There are an epic number of variables in a person's life that you didn't even consider.
The fact that the Lower Court found him guilty is unbelievable. No reasonable person would find guilt , but yet they do. Thank you for all you do Mr lackluster.. so informative, great follow ups.
This is the worst part of this case. We've seen officers, mayor's, and prosecutors ignore the rights granted not just by the Constitution, but even past legal decisions. To rise high enough to become a judge and see that video and find the guy guilty over something as flimsy as suspicious circumstances, is awful. Whoever that judge was needs to get their brain checked.
@@jonthebru bullshit, lie all you want, but footage shows everything. Unless you want me to believe the prosecution lied about the law to a fucking judge.
Who ever said the court isn't corporately owned, just like the cops. They all serve their masters. We are just a way for them to all become more wealthy.
Understanding, and caring is two separate things. They know, they just don't care. They get their ego hurt by being told no, and they take it personal and have to show they are in charge and do stupid shit because of it.
Come back in 2032, and 2042, you'll be able to make the same statement. Police department average IQs are generally lower than the average for the population as a whole.
people keep thinking we are a democracy not understanding that the Constitution makes it a Republic. I agree with you. but, would take it even further that everyone born here in America should know this. yet, our President does not seem to even understand what our Constitutional rights are.
It's easy. QI, no repercussions, citizen has to fight uphill for years, and it is very rare that citizens do fight back due to the lawyers and $ involved.
The court even shared an opinion that Stray was arrested because he was obnoxious. Essentially claiming that they arrested him because he didn't submit like a beaten dog to his masters with badges. Immunity should go out the window in this case.
At this point, we're used to seeing vidoes about cops getting the law wrong, but when the courts get it wrong?? THAT is the real danger in this case. Charges should have been dropped as soon as a DA reviewed the case. The fact that it went to court and a judge upheld the charges is the disgusting part.
@@sampleowner6677 i used to feel the same way, but have been watching so many auditors and court cases now, i see many judges are as stupid and corrupt as cops and rule on their feelings. Yes, judges can in fact be that stupid.
Exactly. That court is obviously corrupt and should be disbarred. Only a moron or a corrupt bastard could get this ruling wrong, and either way they are not fit to judge.
It's not surprising because Magistrates and Municipal Judges in New Mexico and in most states are not required to have a law degree. So they don't know the law themselves.
Same here and I agree! We served to protect the republic, it’s Constitution, and our freedom. That one judge is bill of SHEET, and saying it would be a good target makes that judge look absolutely STUPID.
I've watched the original video a few times and NEVER was the dude 'obnoxious', never. He was calm. He was lucid and up to the minute informed so far as I can see, total respect from here in the UK, keep it up what your doing is important.
Here it's a natural instinct for cops to lie. They always embellish their reports and exaggerate everything. They take anything you say and twist it into their preconceived narratives. That's why the Supreme Court of the United States has advised our citizens to not talk to cops. Rightfully so.
This is an older story, and I remember the judge give her ruling. It was awesome that she upheld the constitution and the auditor was cleared. What’s horrible is that the auditor had to go through years of litigation to clear himself! That goes against everything that country was founded on.
What do you call psychos like yourself and all the psychos that are making life more miserable every year for the rest of everyday people because of their obsessions? Do you belong to a club?
Even the judge who finally corrected the previous judge snd the 2 incompetent officers still showed her lack of respect for his rights by saying he was abnoxious by sticking up for his rights which he certainly was not. Keep fighting but its like the proverbial brick wall for you guys, dont know how you keep going but we appreciate it very much. Thankyou.
You can still be polite when you stick up for your rights, and Stray Dog wasn't as polite as he could have been. Not that it matters in the long run, because as the appeals judge stated it's not a crime to be obnoxious anyway. So even if he was 100 times more obnoxious than he actually was, it wouldn't have justified any legal action against him. If that influenced their decisions in any way, that's a major failing of the police AND the original magistrate.
I heard her as saying 'although he was obnoxious, that isn't a crime' - paraphrased. That has a direct implication to law enforcement that anyone can be as unpleasant as they like to the police and they have no authority over that.
Because eventually these auditors would have stripped all the mortar holding those bricks together to the point where they can push it down without any effort at all. Making America free again is a fight that requires more than just the activists we have to complete the task. And maybe we will get a vigilante someday who will go clean up the scum for us, like batman. There are no end of criminals wearing police uniforms and judges robes, and shit's starting to feel a lot of Gotham.
Damn right brother! I’m a Vietnam Era Vet and it sickens me to see these cops that have no idea about the laws the took an oath to defend. Especially when they get a bunch of them watching and making a mockery as they witness rights violations. Apparently they aren’t required to actually comprehend the oath they take. What a shame.
That magistrate judge should be removed from the bench, the guilty verdict he or she handed down was knowingly in contradiction to the law and constitution, and was only handed down to push an agenda. That is the most extreme kind of tyranny, a judge ruling against the law and constitution has no business being on the bench, they belong in jail.
Good for him! I can’t cheer loud enough. I hope he wins his civil suit as well. If you’re going to be an enforcer of the law, by God you have to actually know the law first.
This video not only shows the cops don’t know the laws it also shows the court don’t understand the laws and uphold rights without pressure from above ! That was a clear cut case and the court initially ruled in favor of the cops feelings instead of the law ! WHY ! ! !
'Cus I bet the judge is an ex-prosecutor, they know the chances of a citizen going the next step and appealing is slim...Or the judge is just a dumb fck, graduated the bottom of their law class, working in a municipal court and think they rule over the entire world without an consequences...
Qualified immunity my ass! That male officer flat out said "no" and shook his head every time Stray pointed out clearly and audibly what his rights are. There is no excuse that "a reasonable person" would believe otherwise.
It's standard operating procedures. If Stray Dog had not been able to get good legal help, this case would have ended with a conviction for the auditor. So many cases like this go through the system, and are never challenged.
Most magistrates are not elected judges.. they are usually layers, appointed by local government to help with case overload. not accountable and heavily indebted to city business interests.
Thanks for following up. This type of arrest is going to go to the USSC sometime as 4 circuits have not explicitly ruled filming police and filming in public to be legal.
Recently a case was brought to the USSC but they choose not to hear it. So they punted and all lower court rulings stand. So if people are in circuits where filming has been affirmed then they are still good to go. But the circuits that have not ruled or not ruled favorably leaves auditors and everyday citizens in those areas in jeopardy. And the biggest problem with that is people don’t realize that. They keep hearing "the Supreme Court has already ruled that filming the police and govt officials in the performance of their duties is legal as long as the filmer is somewhere they are allowed to be." I cringe when I see this happen by auditors, who are not helping others in those outlier circuits, when they don’t put up disclaimers that tell viewers to check their areas laws and applicable court rulings before trying this themselves because it’s actually not a Supreme Court ruling. Or just stop saying that altogether.
I found that "no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir"-ing of the cops far more obnoxious than anything Stray did. Probably could have worn a shirt that had sleeves on it to court though.
Yeah, he's really polite compared to other auditors. If sticking to your guns is obnoxious, everyone in this video is obnoxious. Except for that guy whose truck stalled and needed help pushing it.
Thank you for keeping our Rights Front and Center ! And trying your best to educate these under educated police officers and security guards.. it's a shame they weren't willing to be educated by a civilian that they swore to protect. I further hope they lose their Qualified Immunity and you win your Civil Rights Suit against them . I also thank your Lawyer for representing you in this civil rights case. Bless you both.
Holy shit man, that is a true American if I’ve ever seen one. I strive to be as American as this man every single day and if these government officials did too this country would be a much better place. I love my country and I want to see it at the top of the world again 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Sadly that's never going to happen. Our government and any governing body capable of meaningful progress on behalf of the citizenry has been captured my corporations. The country is being run into the ground and stripped of it's resources.
They need to come up with a better testing or screening process for anyone getting a job with the government. If most government officials knew the Constitution and particularly the bill of rights, they could correct each other before mistakes like this ever end up involving police, and courts.
If its your word against a cop's, you better have 3 witnesses, a video, and a notarized statement from God, and the judge might, *might* listen to your version of events.
They have to work with the police on a daily basis, so of course they side with the police, as a single policeman with a grudge can make a case so much more troublesome and timeconsuming. Now, here is what i really don´t understand. when you have policemen that are rotten to the core ( yes, shocking i know, but they do exist ), the police union is often there in a hurry to defend them tooth and nail. This lowers the publics trust in the police all over the country, and make the job harder for all good policemen and women out there. Is the police unions actions really in the police best interest, or do they just assume that most of them are rotten - and act accordingly ?
Putting someone in cuffs and taking them away, without any reasonable suspicion that a crime actually has been committed, should be seen as a kidnapping. Adding charges afterwards should be seen as retaliation.
It happens every now and then on Amagansett Press's channel lol. But only because the police already know and fear him because they know they'll get sued. So they're always on their best behavior when they run into him. But for the most part, on his more recent videos, they admit he doesn't have to give ID.
Thank you stray dog ,you stood up for all of us and we respect you for it. Imagine how great it would be if we could rely on our rights being respected that’s the country we want to live in.
Let's not forget the lower court Judge getting the ENTIRE ruling wrong... No wonder cops do this shit, dumb ass judges provide them the foundation to be dumb asses as well...
SGT Beau; Just because these thugs received training, doesn't necessarily mean that they are trained. Sometimes training is like pouring water on a rock. It just doesn't sink in. Retraining may not be the answer, but damaging their wallets, jail time, and unemployment will always work. End qualified immunity!
Its not the training. Its the mentality that creeps in. I graduated the police Academy and wasn't trained to act like this. I also wasn't really trained on constitutional law either. So its more like the lack of training. I believe all cops should need 2 years of training before graduating. My Academy class was more military based rather than law based
Great comments about his intentions and rights. Any reasonable person would see this as 1A protected activity. But then, I think the word reasonable doesn't apply to the dumb.
Exactly, cops were given QUALIFIED immunity...this has spun into almost an ABSOLUTE immunity. Police should have personal liability insurance the same as doctors have. This would be a perfect solution for what the Supreme Court INTENDED with qualified immunity. If you are a public servant, you shouldn't have ANY type of immunity from your actions to the people you serve.
That ruling is caused by the same reason the police arrested him: corporate tax money. Both the local police and local courts are _heavily_ financed by this private entity - the largest refinery in New Mexico. They'll do whatever it takes to make sure their biggest -customer- provider is pleased with their "service" to the community.
As this man stated: to expose corruption at government levels. Judges can be tyrants and corrupt, too. I admire and respect this auditor's work.
2 ปีที่แล้ว +1
Exactly what I'm thinking. Cops being ignorant idiots isn't really surprising, though it's disgusting no less. But for a judge to not put a stop to all this BS?!
@@madtabby66 they determine guilt or innocence in a criminal proceeding. That's a "judge." Also, what law degree do they hold and what proof do they have that they're competent in their understanding of the law? Sounds like some jackass doing the judge's work so the judge can go golfing.
I think "care to know them" is the bigger issue. Yes there are ignorant cops, but the majority of ones that try to force people to ID know they don't have authority to do that and continue to break the law because they don't face any repercussions
@@stephengrigg5988 Thats it ! There is no incentive to comply to the law, because lets face it, these cops are still working today on full pay... Why would they willingly make their life harder ? Would you willingly make your life harder if there was no repercussions for making it easier ? Of course not. Like the cop on the video said, Mr Bailey, "would you like to bet ? YES", he is willing to bet because even if he loses he doesnt actually lose or forfeit anything... Would you bet if you could win and never lose ? Of course. So we need to make them accountable.
This is awesome! I'm glad he stood up for his rights and won in the court. I'm happy he had a great lawyer that brought the trial to another court. I'm tired of the bully's getting away with whatever they want. God bless that second Judge man. Stay safe ✌️† ❤️
He’s an OG! I respect & commend this man for standing up against corruption! If only other citizens would refuse to waver. This man was very polite & unthreatening until his rights were violated. He is a free man..an American who is clearly being harassed. Knowledge is powerful.
He's gonna win that lawsuit. Its scary to think cops walking around trying to uphold feelings instead of actual laws, and the judges that find people guilty of no crime are just as bad.
He will be able to sue the city. Unfortunately, because he was found guilty by the magistrate court, this can make losing qualified immunity and holding the individual officers more difficult.
They are human beings just like you. I can only imagine how you would act if someone was obnoxious to you at your work place. Tell me you would be just a very nice and reasonable person. Hahhhhahhahhhahha
You’re obnoxious because your standup for your rights I don’t want to give you !! No one is above the law! Abolish qualified immunity, make these gestapo pass test about our rights and the laws. Then they must be bonded.
Stray Dog was “obnoxious”? First, forcefully asserting one’s rights that are so clearly being violated is not “obnoxious”. Second, the appellate judge is inserting an opinion that has no basis in the law and should not be on record. No “reasonable” person is going to view the facts on the recording and conclude his arrest was for anything more than “contempt of cop”.
lol That’s basically what she said…. Contempt of cop. You’re letting your hurt feelings cloud your judgement as if she was calling YOU obnoxious. He DID act obnoxious at times. Besides, not everyone is as dumb as the lenslicking lemmings in the TH-cam comments. What… you don’t think the judge is intelligent enough to figure out this guy is out there SPECIFICALLY to draw security out hoping they’ll tell him to leave, call the cops and pray he gets the ones that don’t know “public easement” rules? lol You think she’s a judge SO dumb she didn’t figure out quickly he wasn’t REALLY “gathering content for a story…. Collecting B roll…. doing a public interest expose” ? lol Even Judges binge watch Silenceboy, Glen Cerio and Spanky Pants while playing Frauditor Bingo when they get bored!!
@@henryhenrison7122 He only acted obnoxious toward the guy that was filming him, when he called him a punk but that guy has no authority to be trying to boss people around anyway and was being obnoxious by trying to so fuck him. He never acted obnoxious toward the police or security. Never resorted to name calling or taunting them like other 1st amendment auditors that I've seen. And even if he was being obnoxious - that's not a crime and there is no law which prohibits being "obnoxious". Calling someone obnoxious is in itself being obnoxious, it's just another form of name calling and it's based 100% on your opinion. Define obnoxious because my opinion is that he wasn't being obnoxious. In fact he was doing all of us a favor by keeping people honest and showing them that there will be consequences for violating our rights. I bet they won't do that again but even if they do, there will be consequences again and possibly even heavier fines because there was a prior incident and they should have known better.
That's how cops get banished. They don't dare violate the Blue Brotherhood bullshit. It supercedes everything. Forget about oaths, Forget morals or law. When it comes to it, nothing else matters to them because they seek the constant reassurance the other law breakers provide. They live in a vacuum. An echo chamber. Nothing matters but their fellow cops and eventual retirement. And as long as you can never be held responsible, thanks to the unions and qualified immunity, and dishonest prosecutors and judges, they are free to reign tyranny on the public with impunity.
If you were a mafioso would you tell your boss to stop punching someone because it violates some policy ? This is a large gang that works for investors and big business, if you think of them as a gang then alot of things slot into place.
So if the courts ruled that there was no probable cause for the arrest how can the cops then claim QI which requires probable cause to qualify for immunity? Until we apply QI properly and require officers to carry personal liability insurance the tyranny and stupidity will never end.
I once had a cop tell me they know the Constitution better than most lawyers- obviously not. The only reason he was convicted the first time was due to the company owning the judge via campaign money. Corporations have far too much power in America.
The attorney for the city is as big of an idiot as the officers. "You never intended to provide your ID, DID YOU!!!!?" Like he really got him there! Anyone who doesn't intend to provide their ID MUST BE GUILTY!
The city prosecutor got Stray Dog to admit that the only reason he didn't provide ID was to stand up for his rights... as if that's a petty or frivolous reason! I think that salient fact completely makes Stray Dog's case. He didn't refuse to ID to avoid being identified for outstanding warrants or a prior crime. He did exactly what he repeatedly tried to explain to the cops who illegally arrested him. He refused to identify himself because he had committed no crime and they had no reasonable articulable suspicion.
The attorney for the city is an even bigger criminal than the cops. They're just evil cowards and if you hurt their feelings they will make s*** up and try to charge you with it. To serve and protect????? Sounds like that cop was really protecting that man's rights!
There's so much wrong from those so called law enforcement officers from this audit, it would be too long to say. It's ashame that they are so ignorant of the law or they just don't care but they beg for qualified immunity when they know they are in the wrong. So many lawsuits that are so clear that it takes so long when it shouldn't. No reason why he should not win this suit. Can't wait to see the outcome for Stray Dog. My opinion Lacklusters channel is the most educational in many ways.
The civil rights paperwork was filed 1 /1/2 yrs ago and one day ago you said . "Can't wait to see the outcome for Stray Dog" . Something does not pass my smell test.
Those cops had no clue what was going on, They were so bent on getting as ID it was like crack to them, I hope the judge does the right thing and disqualifies their immunity For the officers, They had no clue About the Constitution law when it comes to filming, Stray dog did a really great job and I'm looking forward to more of his audits
SALUTE to Stray dog AND his attorney!!! I LOVE how the attorney asked why he wanted to know about his name and how dog didn't pay that BS about this makes for a good target.
I think the male cop was just as bad if not worse. He was so adamant that he was correct. Which reflects either a terrible understanding of the law or even worse a blatant disregard for the public's rights. I'm not even American I am Australian and as the auditor stated to many people have died to protect those rights. From your country and mine, and as an active ADF member I would happily stand alongside my american brothers to defend our freedoms.
I’m so tired of seeing cops who think they can arrest you for failure to ID. Do they seriously think that their badge gives them the right to know the name, date of birth, address, height, and whatever other info is on a license of ANY and EVERY citizen? They seriously think they get to just demand ID from anyone for any reason? What the actual F***
You'd think with all the incidents when cops failed by asking for ID without probable cause they'd retrain them or send out a memo or something to get the news out by now. But they continue to behave as per usual and no changes have been made thereby continuously violating citizens rights! It's ridiculous. THEY work FOR us! Not against us. They need to stop perceiving and disrespecting every innocent citizens abiding the law or even those committing misdemeanors as human beings not like were common thugs! What training taught them that this is okay? That this is how they're supposed to approach us? They sure as hell better get seriously reformed or eventually precincts will go bankrupt. Oh but the President wants to give them MORE funds? Wtf? It better be to retrain these idiots or else there will be hell to pay. People are woke and will no longer tolerate being disrespected! Lying and falsely charging us for petty crimes or crimes we never committed. And don't get me started on why we need to defund them. Just ask yourself~ why is it that every single traffic stop or event require back up, typically involving 3-5 cop cars? For what? To stand around and play witness? That's a waste of our tax dollars and a clear indication that there's not enough crime or work for them to do if any given car can drop what theyre doing (most likely eating donuts) and run over to cover back up on a simple traffic stop with a burnt our tail light. Give me a freakin break! I'm surprised this issue hasn't been investigated already. Its definitely valid and occurring at alarming rates. Its because they are required to meet quotas and need to lie to account for their wasted time doing nothing. It's infuriating!!
The fact that these cops added charges after the fact that they’re not being prosecuted for malicious violation of this man’s well-being has me completely befuddled how are these cops able to knowingly intentionally destroy peoples lives against law and then walk away without any charges is an absolute travesty
Don’t see how they can claim to be operating in good faith when they added every contempt of cop charge they could to justify their poor decision. I’ve seen people be let go without charge when the cops realise they fucked up and I could at least understand their argument for good faith ignorance.
They call it the "thin blue line" like it's just a way to say they protect each other while violating flag code by desecrating our flag. But it's so much deeper than that because it's the fraternal order of police protecting them! And the masons are at the root of every problem in this Satanic corrupt world! They own everything & everyone! The bad guys never play to lose & that's what's WRONG!!! It's the inversion of reality. Everything is backwards, upside down & inside out. Good is evil & evil is good, wrong is right & right is wrong. They are the ONLY real terrorist to invade America...I call em BLUE !$!$ & they need to be eliminated from society!!!
Why oh why aren’t cops educated in the rights of citizens . The bill of rights state clearly what is our freedoms and cops should know this forward , backward , inside , outside and upside down . Qualified immunity is the go to card to protect the ignorance of the laws all LEOs have sworn an oath to uphold. I say do away with the oath altogether if it is forgotten as soon as recited . It means nothing apparently . Just ask any LEOs to recite their oath and wait for response. I wonder how many could recite the pledge of allegiance ?
Because time on the range or at Dunkin Donuts is more fun? Cops are poorly trained because of poor oversight, the bad (or damaged) people who become police, etc
That case should have never gotten past the first magistrate. Unbelievable that he was originally found guilty when the whole thing is right there on video.
17:22 So, when you get annoyed because people, some in uniform, are trying to deprive you of your rights, the court calls you OBNOXIOUS? The cops are the obnoxious ones here. Collecting tax money for a job they have no clue of how to do, is a disgrace. #whatajokeofacountry
To be fair, you can use your tights obnoxiously. He’s clearly doing this as a test to see if they’ll violate his rights (Hence the audit), and they failed their audit, but obnoxious is the name of the game.
It’s crazy that law enforcement will post pictures right away of someone who was incarcerated, but will take ages to report someone missing! I’ve seen it first hand! Thank you for this!
From my perspective, anytime and auditor or other persons specifically warn officers that they are violating or about to violate your rights, or if they warned the officer to get a supervisor, and they are about to make a big mistake, like you did in this video, all claims to immunity should be null and void. They shouldn't get to claim ignorance when they were warned.
It still never ceases to surprise me when watching cops insisting that citizens have to provide ID when they haven’t even committed a crime. It then makes me even more pi**ed off when the cops arrest a citizen for not producing ID with no crime, but then they make up bogus charges when they realise they’ve made a mistake (in order to justify their utter incompetence)☹
And the judge then says "guilty" and the man has to spend years of his life fighting the charges... No punishment for the officers involved or for the judge who sentenced him... The law doesn't work for us, it works for the companies paying their wages. We need a police service that protects against federal law, a people funded policing system that actually protects people. The funny thing is it would be deemed a terrorist act and labeled as a "mafia"... Actually protecting citizens is illegal in America.
Did he literally just tell thr judge "Because I'm like a stray dog - I answer to any name, I come and go when I please, and I pee wherever I want."?? Pretty sure I want this guy to be my dad.
Artesia Police: facebook.com/artesiapd
www.artesianm.gov/161/Police
Stray Dog The Exposer:
th-cam.com/video/77o2nPZruqA/w-d-xo.html
Stray’s Donation Link:
www.paypal.com/paypalme/StrayDogTheExposer
Submit your video: forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6
Other Channels:
The Odd Side: th-cam.com/channels/TSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw.html
LackLuster Limited: th-cam.com/channels/tj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w.html
Police department’s complaint system, internal review and investigation, district attorneys and lower courts have all become irrelevant. There is a conflict of interest there that if they rule in the favor of the complaining citizen then it gives evidence for the person to sue monetarily and expose their corruption.
So automatically they’re always going to rule against the person and hope that stops them from going any further.
You have to just assume that no matter what you’re going to have to go to a higher court that is hopefully not corrupt also.
People must start suing Security companies too
Fantastic video that again shows the ignorance and arrogance of LE today in 2022.
It typifies that LEO's will always fall back upon Qualified Immunity.
Qualified immunity lets the police off the hook for misconduct and denies their victims compensation. Police unions claim that qualified immunity exists to protect police officers who play by the rules. But it does the exact opposite. Qualified immunity only protects officials who have broken the law.
Is it probable cause or reasonable suspicion needed for police to get your ID?
I just heard a judge say reasonable suspicion. ????
@@Sweetyhide In states like California and Texas you must be arrested. You can be detained for reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime but do not have to identify.
In some states it’s when you’re detained that you must id but they must have reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime to detain you in the first place.
Man that was powerful how that young man stated that too many people have died for those rights just for me to give them up because law-enforcement shows up man that was heavy loved it🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Amen
Cool people
literally every auditor says this
Excellent comment. God bless you. 👍
@@arushford because its true and powerful medicine to the fashy bootlicking
END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY IMMEDIATELY. We should be able to sue these cops personally. Start draining their pension when they violate our rights. Why should the taxpayers foot the bill for their inept policing. Colorado and a few other states ended qualified immunity. It’s time all 50 states to end it.
Qualified immunity ended in New Mexico June 2021
Qualified Immunity is not the main problem. Terry v. Ohio SCOTUS case is the main nullification cops use against citizens to fleece them daily. Qualified Immunity (when applicable) is an after thought. Reverse Terry v. Ohio and the excuse to begin thousands of interactions would disappear over night. Without Terry v. Ohio the "Officer Safety" excuse to nullify rights would cease to exist thus the police would not be able to interact unless they had "Probable Cause". Right now police will manufacture their reason under "suspicious behavior" and attempt to create the narrative of probable cause just like they did with this case. Let's not forget that this case passed through the lower courts showing that the criminal activities go from the officers in the field all the way up through the prosecutor and local magistrate (judge). Most would not have the ability to show this level of blatant impunity exists because the costs associated with hiring an attorney to navigate a case like this is almost 100K or more. This case is an absolute service to the public and the Pro Bono lawyer who helped is a legal hero!
Qualified immunity still exist in Colorado and New Mexico. There are two separate courts here, state and federal. Most civil rights suits are federal suits. The Colorado law for example doesn't exactly end QI it just changes it. In fact it works out good for the officer because his liability is limited to $25,000 the rest is on the city. The city can also indemnify the officer, assuming liability on behalf of the officer. Haven't looked into New Mexico. However I 100% agree with the prior comment regarding RAS as a more significant issue as it is what gives the officer the authority to violate rights as we so frequently see.
QI doesn't apply to criminal charges and in fact once convicted QI is a much lower hurdle to overcome.
One option we might consider is using grand juries to allow citizens to bring criminal complaint against public officials. An indictment would then mandate the state prosecute the crime. Why should we burden the individual to police the police by financial cost. Let's have the state use our taxes to police the police. An alternative would be to allow for a private or special prosecutor at state expense who would not have the same conflict of interest with a local police department.
QI will always exist to some extent, it should never be what the courts have made it into but it will always exist.
Just some thoughts
I wish it was so true get rid of bad cops
@@Ghettoize it's also time to stop them investigating themselves also. The day that happens is the day your see thousands of vermin tyrant's run for the hills. FTP.
This stops when cops start having to pay for the lawsuit out of pocket. Period. When the ignorant thugs learn it costs them actual consequences instead of a two week paid vacation, this ignorance and ego trip is very short.
Exactly
Or the insurance will drop them if they see the officer is a liability.
Ultimately the police unions will bargain for the municipality to foot the bill, but *someone* paying the price is the first step in reform.
@@nightcross1030 municipalities already pay the price. By tax funded lawsuit settlements. That needs to stop and let the officers pay for it out of pocket themselves. Or require them to carry liability insurance and when they get too expensive and get dropped they get desk duty only.
a cop's ignorance comes at a high price for the tax payers and an even higher price for ignorant or prejudiced judges.
“Too many people have died for my rights for me to just give them up” that was powerful. Wise words.
Gave me chills, because it's SO TRUE
Very intelligent reply
✊️
You heard it here folks ....
Being obnoxious is Not against the law ....Good news for me ...
@@nasapayrollsystem8701absolutely, brother. 💯🤙
If being annoying we’re a crime I would STILL be locked up.
It shocks me that there are so many police that think following their own policy to identify applies to a private citizen.
Are they that stupid, or just disingenuous?
This idea of "I got a call", or "I have to fill out my report" have nothing to do with having to ID.
The are mercenaries working for the Government
Poorly educated, low cognition and led by even poorer example. Part of this is the case law--Jordan v New London where the court said (in effect) that police are free to set their own hiring standards.
Both -- they have qualified immunity so why would they care?
It’s because of how police are trained. They’re trained to get all the info they need for their report. What information the report consists of varies from department to department. Here in America, we don’t train our police force to know the laws they swore to uphold, instead we train them how to fill out paperwork…
"I will never surrender my rights....Too many people have died for them rights" AMEN BROTHA!!!
From all videos yes and nos THIS LINE BRO🙏❤️💯
LOL Do you really think that American soldiers have recently fought for "our rights"?? They fight for the rich globalists banksters that are destroying America.
@@TJ-we7id recently was not articulated in the comment so your point is moot
You misspelled “brother”- just and FYI.
The fact that the lower courts continue to rule in favor of these tyrannical cops and PDs is mind-boggling.
Theyre in cahoots.
The fact that no matter how many times the lower courts get it wrong, there are no repercussions is a big part of the problem. Maybe there should be a three strike rule for judges.
Why mind-boggling?
They are in the same club!?!
@@jerrodbutali3990 That Judge should be included in the lawsuit put the whole GANG under the lights
@@eristicfreethinker2098 Judges can be voted out. Beginning to happen, but way to few of them are not included in the lawsuits as they should be
If we are NOT going to have the balls and courage to stand up like this guy THEN we need to support the ones who do! God Bless these folks
The scary thing is that one court found him guilty that judge needs to be looked into clearly violated his oath of office
How many incompetent and crooked judges in America?
@@francoisbouvier7861 short answer alot ... they just run a racket in small towns I remember I jade a dui which was a false arrest but the judge would not let me represent myself only would talk to me if I hired a lawyer then after I did my lawyer walked in shopk the judges hand came over to said your good it's going to be dropped just make sure you pay me and your good . Wtf
Yes, it seems like a fairly easy and open and shut case there was no reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime committed the officers didn't even make up a fake one and they had no right to check his ID, it was funny how the appeals court judge took what seemed like 10 seconds to reversely magistrate judges decision, this shows clear and present corruption amongst the Magistrate Court as well as the entire police department and police chief, he should be able to very easily Sue not only the Magister judge or magistrate court but as well the entire police department as well as the police chief they should all be stripped of their qualified immunity because they very clearly did not follow the law and negligence of the law is not a defense.... Tired of these damn feelings police
@@Smashmilk if you truly felt it was a false arrest keep pushing higher.take out that Loan etc city state county will pay lawyer fees after negotiations. So yeah.
@@terrycoontz "take out that Loan etc city state county will pay lawyer fees after negotiations." /// You make it sound so simple. Yes, they might pay. If he wins. Eventually. Years from now. Until then he'll have to pay on that loan, assuming he can afford it. What if he's supposed to be saving to put his kids through college? There are an epic number of variables in a person's life that you didn't even consider.
The fact that the Lower Court found him guilty is unbelievable. No reasonable person would find guilt , but yet they do. Thank you for all you do Mr lackluster.. so informative, great follow ups.
This is the worst part of this case. We've seen officers, mayor's, and prosecutors ignore the rights granted not just by the Constitution, but even past legal decisions. To rise high enough to become a judge and see that video and find the guy guilty over something as flimsy as suspicious circumstances, is awful. Whoever that judge was needs to get their brain checked.
They’re all traitors. Treat them as such
That judge believed all the lies.
@@jonthebru bullshit, lie all you want, but footage shows everything. Unless you want me to believe the prosecution lied about the law to a fucking judge.
Who ever said the court isn't corporately owned, just like the cops. They all serve their masters. We are just a way for them to all become more wealthy.
It’s 2022 how do the police don’t understand the 1st amendment is beyond me!
Understanding, and caring is two separate things. They know, they just don't care. They get their ego hurt by being told no, and they take it personal and have to show they are in charge and do stupid shit because of it.
Come back in 2032, and 2042, you'll be able to make the same statement. Police department average IQs are generally lower than the average for the population as a whole.
people keep thinking we are a democracy not understanding that the Constitution makes it a Republic. I agree with you. but, would take it even further that everyone born here in America should know this. yet, our President does not seem to even understand what our Constitutional rights are.
Yeah. Years of 1aa seems to have no effect on cops egos.
It's easy. QI, no repercussions, citizen has to fight uphill for years, and it is very rare that citizens do fight back due to the lawyers and $ involved.
The court even shared an opinion that Stray was arrested because he was obnoxious. Essentially claiming that they arrested him because he didn't submit like a beaten dog to his masters with badges.
Immunity should go out the window in this case.
Officers and justices consider someone's explanation as being obnoxious.
@@ClarityDetermination Because they are trained to hate the public and treat them like criminal who need to prove otherqise.
At this point, we're used to seeing vidoes about cops getting the law wrong, but when the courts get it wrong?? THAT is the real danger in this case. Charges should have been dropped as soon as a DA reviewed the case. The fact that it went to court and a judge upheld the charges is the disgusting part.
I agree. I was surprised it went to court and they ruled for the cops. Judges should know and understand the law.
@@sampleowner6677 i used to feel the same way, but have been watching so many auditors and court cases now, i see many judges are as stupid and corrupt as cops and rule on their feelings. Yes, judges can in fact be that stupid.
Exactly. That court is obviously corrupt and should be disbarred. Only a moron or a corrupt bastard could get this ruling wrong, and either way they are not fit to judge.
Is not called the kangaroo court system for nothing.
It's not surprising because Magistrates and Municipal Judges in New Mexico and in most states are not required to have a law degree. So they don't know the law themselves.
I served my country by enlisting in the military at 17 years old, just after graduating High School. This man is serving his country even better.
Thank you for your service and sacrifice
Thanks for your service.
Same here and I agree! We served to protect the republic, it’s Constitution, and our freedom. That one judge is bill of SHEET, and saying it would be a good target makes that judge look absolutely STUPID.
I did the exact same thing, HS in Alamogordo, MEPS in El Paso, 1983. Courage does not just surface while supporting a flag.
Thank you for your service to the fucking globalists who are trying to destroy the country you thought you were protecting.
The fact they found him guilty first AND there was a video showing everything is extremely concerning.
Big problem with jurrys these days. They judge off feelings.
@@ryanjones7681 Was it a jury trial or a bench trial? I was wondering and didn’t recall hearing one way or the other.
@@CounterSniper67 Magistrates are bench trials,corrupt as fuck,i think Maritime law not Common law!
@@kateroyston9416 and most magistrates aren't elected Judges... they are appointed by local gov't heavily indebted to the local industries.
STEVEN,MORE THAN THAT IT'S CRIMINAL!
“Too many people have died defending those rights”
Bravo brother
I've watched the original video a few times and NEVER was the dude 'obnoxious', never. He was calm. He was lucid and up to the minute informed so far as I can see, total respect from here in the UK, keep it up what your doing is important.
Here it's a natural instinct for cops to lie. They always embellish their reports and exaggerate everything. They take anything you say and twist it into their preconceived narratives. That's why the Supreme Court of the United States has advised our citizens to not talk to cops. Rightfully so.
You mean they don't teach English in the UK either? You're, your.
Ye he was at the beginning to the guard
Being obnoxious does not forfeit your constitutional rights.
Always ask the cop if you've done something wrong. You get them to establish you have not broken the law.
This is an older story, and I remember the judge give her ruling. It was awesome that she upheld the constitution and the auditor was cleared. What’s horrible is that the auditor had to go through years of litigation to clear himself! That goes against everything that country was founded on.
CINDLAND,THERE IS THE REASON LEOS GET AWAY WITH ALL THEIR BULLSHIT, MOST PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE THE TIME OR RESOURCES TO FIGHT FOR THEIR RIGHTS.
What do you call psychos like yourself and all the psychos that are making life more miserable every year for the rest of everyday people because of their obsessions? Do you belong to a club?
But what absolutely stinks is that the magistrate sided with the police, as they always do.
@@belair54 why are you yelling, man
@@madmax82988 I TYPE IN CAPS! CAUGHT YOUR ATTENTION LOL!
MIND BLOWING…ABSOLUTELY AMAZING..AND NOTHING IS DONE TO THESE COPS..WHEN SUED, THE MONEY SHOULD COME OUT OF THE COPS AND THE DEPARTMENT
"You better call your supervisor before you do something stupid" I love when people like him roast ignorant law enforcement
Shoutout to Straydog, much love and respect from Roswell New Mexico thank you for standing up for our rights 💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽
Shout out**
@@abe_ismain lol👍🏽
I abhor those officers, but I admire Stray Dog. He is willing to stand up for our rights and I salute him. Thank you Stray Dog.
Wow. Ive never really thought of it that way, "Too many people have DIED for those rights" Amen brother. Amen
Even the judge who finally corrected the previous judge snd the 2 incompetent officers still showed her lack of respect for his rights by saying he was abnoxious by sticking up for his rights which he certainly was not. Keep fighting but its like the proverbial brick wall for you guys, dont know how you keep going but we appreciate it very much.
Thankyou.
Yup, and no law saying we cant be "obnoxious".
Obnoxious must be the antonym for bootlicker.
You can still be polite when you stick up for your rights, and Stray Dog wasn't as polite as he could have been. Not that it matters in the long run, because as the appeals judge stated it's not a crime to be obnoxious anyway. So even if he was 100 times more obnoxious than he actually was, it wouldn't have justified any legal action against him. If that influenced their decisions in any way, that's a major failing of the police AND the original magistrate.
I heard her as saying 'although he was obnoxious, that isn't a crime' - paraphrased. That has a direct implication to law enforcement that anyone can be as unpleasant as they like to the police and they have no authority over that.
Because eventually these auditors would have stripped all the mortar holding those bricks together to the point where they can push it down without any effort at all. Making America free again is a fight that requires more than just the activists we have to complete the task. And maybe we will get a vigilante someday who will go clean up the scum for us, like batman. There are no end of criminals wearing police uniforms and judges robes, and shit's starting to feel a lot of Gotham.
"Too many people have died for my rights." Something to keep in mind, folks.
Much respect to this gentleman.
🙏🏻
I think it is important also to interpret all the rights and amendment rights in their entirety - not take parts of them which is incorrect.
@@ClarityDetermination The ultimate interpretation lies with the judges.
@@peterk8909 really? 😆
@@ClarityDetermination Yeah, really.
Damn right brother! I’m a Vietnam Era Vet and it sickens me to see these cops that have no idea about the laws the took an oath to defend. Especially when they get a bunch of them watching and making a mockery as they witness rights violations. Apparently they aren’t required to actually comprehend the oath they take. What a shame.
@AirG, thank you for your service and "Welcome Home"! You are right on point!
✊️
That magistrate judge should be removed from the bench, the guilty verdict he or she handed down was knowingly in contradiction to the law and constitution, and was only handed down to push an agenda. That is the most extreme kind of tyranny, a judge ruling against the law and constitution has no business being on the bench, they belong in jail.
Right should be exposing judges as well not only cops because these problems start from the top
@@ezequielramos1508 Exactly. That's why they don't allow recording in the courtroom... When they have something to hide they ban cameras.
Good for him! I can’t cheer loud enough. I hope he wins his civil suit as well. If you’re going to be an enforcer of the law, by God you have to actually know the law first.
This video not only shows the cops don’t know the laws it also shows the court don’t understand the laws and uphold rights without pressure from above ! That was a clear cut case and the court initially ruled in favor of the cops feelings instead of the law ! WHY ! ! !
Corruption
Justice =just us (them) sadly 😥
'Cus I bet the judge is an ex-prosecutor, they know the chances of a citizen going the next step and appealing is slim...Or the judge is just a dumb fck, graduated the bottom of their law class, working in a municipal court and think they rule over the entire world without an consequences...
Qualified immunity my ass! That male officer flat out said "no" and shook his head every time Stray pointed out clearly and audibly what his rights are. There is no excuse that "a reasonable person" would believe otherwise.
This guy is so well versed. It’s not a script. He just knows his right; like every citizen should.
How did the magistrate find him guilty?? That is extremely concerning.
same way they got retired
It's standard operating procedures. If Stray Dog had not been able to get good legal help, this case would have ended with a conviction for the auditor. So many cases like this go through the system, and are never challenged.
He is in the pocket of Navajo.
The "good ole boys"
Most magistrates are not elected judges.. they are usually layers, appointed by local government to help with case overload. not accountable and heavily indebted to city business interests.
Wow cops lying to a person. Almost like it happens every day. He said you must show ID if I ask for it. He's a joke
Congratulations are due this Judge she is very articulate in protecting our civil rights my hat is off to her.
Respect to the judge for calling out no crime had been committed, and he was arrested for contempt of cop.
Thanks for following up. This type of arrest is going to go to the USSC sometime as 4 circuits have not explicitly ruled filming police and filming in public to be legal.
Recently a case was brought to the USSC but they choose not to hear it. So they punted and all lower court rulings stand. So if people are in circuits where filming has been affirmed then they are still good to go. But the circuits that have not ruled or not ruled favorably leaves auditors and everyday citizens in those areas in jeopardy.
And the biggest problem with that is people don’t realize that. They keep hearing "the Supreme Court has already ruled that filming the police and govt officials in the performance of their duties is legal as long as the filmer is somewhere they are allowed to be."
I cringe when I see this happen by auditors, who are not helping others in those outlier circuits, when they don’t put up disclaimers that tell viewers to check their areas laws and applicable court rulings before trying this themselves because it’s actually not a Supreme Court ruling. Or just stop saying that altogether.
People like you are straight up doing the lord's work my friend. Thank you.
Please keep us up to date on the final results of the lawsuits. Thank you for sharing.
If you stand up for your rights and don't kiss the cops asses, you're automatically labeled as "obnoxious"! Wtf? Smh!🥴
I found that "no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir, no sir"-ing of the cops far more obnoxious than anything Stray did. Probably could have worn a shirt that had sleeves on it to court though.
Yeah, he's really polite compared to other auditors. If sticking to your guns is obnoxious, everyone in this video is obnoxious. Except for that guy whose truck stalled and needed help pushing it.
Thank you sir. He's so right so many died for these rights, I gave up my health for them. Please, don't give them up.
Corporal Bailey: "Turnaround put your hands behind your back".
Straydog: "It's time to get paid!"
Thank you for keeping our Rights Front and Center ! And trying your best to educate these under educated police officers and security guards.. it's a shame they weren't willing to be educated by a civilian that they swore to protect. I further hope they lose their Qualified Immunity and you win your Civil Rights Suit against them . I also thank your Lawyer for representing you in this civil rights case. Bless you both.
Holy shit man, that is a true American if I’ve ever seen one. I strive to be as American as this man every single day and if these government officials did too this country would be a much better place. I love my country and I want to see it at the top of the world again 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Sadly that's never going to happen. Our government and any governing body capable of meaningful progress on behalf of the citizenry has been captured my corporations. The country is being run into the ground and stripped of it's resources.
They need to come up with a better testing or screening process for anyone getting a job with the government. If most government officials knew the Constitution and particularly the bill of rights, they could correct each other before mistakes like this ever end up involving police, and courts.
Eh, your country was only powerful for a hundred years or so. Other countries were powerhouses for thousands of years. 😅
✊️ still get chills to hear him talk about his rights, he is so calm and matter of fact, respect sir!
@@ClarityDeterminationtroll much? 🤣🤣🤣
The fact that an appeal was necessary shows the lower courts frequently side with the police.
If its your word against a cop's, you better have 3 witnesses, a video, and a notarized statement from God, and the judge might, *might* listen to your version of events.
They have to work with the police on a daily basis, so of course they side with the police, as a single policeman with a grudge can make a case so much more troublesome and timeconsuming. Now, here is what i really don´t understand. when you have policemen that are rotten to the core ( yes, shocking i know, but they do exist ), the police union is often there in a hurry to defend them tooth and nail. This lowers the publics trust in the police all over the country, and make the job harder for all good policemen and women out there.
Is the police unions actions really in the police best interest, or do they just assume that most of them are rotten - and act accordingly ?
Putting someone in cuffs and taking them away, without any reasonable suspicion that a crime actually has been committed, should be seen as a kidnapping. Adding charges afterwards should be seen as retaliation.
Just *once* I want to hear a cop say, "You're right! You don't have to give me your ID since we have no reason to suspect that you committed a crime".
It happens every now and then on Amagansett Press's channel lol. But only because the police already know and fear him because they know they'll get sued. So they're always on their best behavior when they run into him. But for the most part, on his more recent videos, they admit he doesn't have to give ID.
We have to protect our rights from the people that takes an oath to protect our rights in the land of the free home of the brave.
I'm not gonna give up my rights that too many people have died for.. well said!
LOL. I love people who film back and say "You can't film me."
The best response was from one auditor who replied "You're filming me."
I love when they walk up to someone filming and say they didn’t give permission lol. You walked up genius
Thank you stray dog ,you stood up for all of us and we respect you for it. Imagine how great it would be if we could rely on our rights being respected that’s the country we want to live in.
"That would be a huge dishonor" great quote. Spread that around the auditing community!
Another example that there is a complete failure in educating police in their training. Disgusting!
Let's not forget the lower court Judge getting the ENTIRE ruling wrong... No wonder cops do this shit, dumb ass judges provide them the foundation to be dumb asses as well...
THE COPS AND THE COMPANIES DONT GIVE A CRAP ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION , OUR RIGHTS, OR THE LAW.
SGT Beau;
Just because these thugs received training, doesn't necessarily mean that they are trained. Sometimes training is like pouring water on a rock. It just doesn't sink in. Retraining may not be the answer, but damaging their wallets, jail time, and unemployment will always work. End qualified immunity!
It is not a training issue.
Its not the training. Its the mentality that creeps in. I graduated the police Academy and wasn't trained to act like this. I also wasn't really trained on constitutional law either. So its more like the lack of training. I believe all cops should need 2 years of training before graduating. My Academy class was more military based rather than law based
Great comments about his intentions and rights. Any reasonable person would see this as 1A protected activity. But then, I think the word reasonable doesn't apply to the dumb.
Exactly, cops were given QUALIFIED immunity...this has spun into almost an ABSOLUTE immunity. Police should have personal liability insurance the same as doctors have. This would be a perfect solution for what the Supreme Court INTENDED with qualified immunity. If you are a public servant, you shouldn't have ANY type of immunity from your actions to the people you serve.
@@billtate6962 .
Time for QI to go away.
They stepping all over we the people's rights... Is this china/Canada?
Lose the bloody immunity for cops!! Save a lot of problems if you did!
Gave me chills when Hes says "To many have died defending those rights for me to just give them up"
It also shows how little of the law magistrates understand. How a "judge" found him guilty in the first place is beyond me.
That ruling is caused by the same reason the police arrested him: corporate tax money.
Both the local police and local courts are _heavily_ financed by this private entity - the largest refinery in New Mexico. They'll do whatever it takes to make sure their biggest -customer- provider is pleased with their "service" to the community.
As this man stated: to expose corruption at government levels. Judges can be tyrants and corrupt, too. I admire and respect this auditor's work.
Exactly what I'm thinking. Cops being ignorant idiots isn't really surprising, though it's disgusting no less. But for a judge to not put a stop to all this BS?!
A magistrate isn’t a judge. It’s a lay person acting in a judicial position.
@@madtabby66 they determine guilt or innocence in a criminal proceeding. That's a "judge." Also, what law degree do they hold and what proof do they have that they're competent in their understanding of the law? Sounds like some jackass doing the judge's work so the judge can go golfing.
Explaining the law to cops is a waste of time. They don’t know them or even care to know them
I think "care to know them" is the bigger issue. Yes there are ignorant cops, but the majority of ones that try to force people to ID know they don't have authority to do that and continue to break the law because they don't face any repercussions
@@stephengrigg5988 Thats it ! There is no incentive to comply to the law, because lets face it, these cops are still working today on full pay... Why would they willingly make their life harder ? Would you willingly make your life harder if there was no repercussions for making it easier ? Of course not. Like the cop on the video said, Mr Bailey, "would you like to bet ? YES", he is willing to bet because even if he loses he doesnt actually lose or forfeit anything... Would you bet if you could win and never lose ? Of course. So we need to make them accountable.
On them
This is awesome! I'm glad he stood up for his rights and won in the court. I'm happy he had a great lawyer that brought the trial to another court. I'm tired of the bully's getting away with whatever they want.
God bless that second Judge man.
Stay safe
✌️† ❤️
I admire his bravery and courage to go through all of that for all of us who love our country and demand changes
There should be an investigation into the lower courts when they are not competent to make a lawful ruling, this is concerning on many levels.
Holy shit! this man....is a man amongst men. 1 in a billion.
I wish the cops could be interviewed after the fact. Their ignorance is insane.
They sometimes are but it's by IA who do their best to clear them of wrongdoing.
They would just say No Comment
There are vids in the IA interview after. They just say they didn’t know.
He’s an OG! I respect & commend this man for standing up against corruption! If only other citizens would refuse to waver. This man was very polite & unthreatening until his rights were violated. He is a free man..an American who is clearly being harassed. Knowledge is powerful.
He's gonna win that lawsuit. Its scary to think cops walking around trying to uphold feelings instead of actual laws, and the judges that find people guilty of no crime are just as bad.
He will be able to sue the city. Unfortunately, because he was found guilty by the magistrate court, this can make losing qualified immunity and holding the individual officers more difficult.
They are human beings just like you. I can only imagine how you would act if someone was obnoxious to you at your work place. Tell me you would be just a very nice and reasonable person. Hahhhhahhahhhahha
@@clownops1 hello, officer!
@@clownops1 But your mistake is saying he is at their work place. If he is not on the property, he is not at their work place.
doubt he'll win lmao
Why does the judge call him "obnoxious" when finding him non-guilty? Is it for her to save face?
You’re obnoxious because your standup for your rights I don’t want to give you !!
No one is above the law! Abolish qualified immunity, make these gestapo pass test about our rights and the laws. Then they must be bonded.
Stray Dog was “obnoxious”? First, forcefully asserting one’s rights that are so clearly being violated is not “obnoxious”. Second, the appellate judge is inserting an opinion that has no basis in the law and should not be on record. No “reasonable” person is going to view the facts on the recording and conclude his arrest was for anything more than “contempt of cop”.
lol That’s basically what she said…. Contempt of cop. You’re letting your hurt feelings cloud your judgement as if she was calling YOU obnoxious. He DID act obnoxious at times.
Besides, not everyone is as dumb as the lenslicking lemmings in the TH-cam comments. What… you don’t think the judge is intelligent enough to figure out this guy is out there SPECIFICALLY to draw security out hoping they’ll tell him to leave, call the cops and pray he gets the ones that don’t know “public easement” rules? lol You think she’s a judge SO dumb she didn’t figure out quickly he wasn’t REALLY “gathering content for a story…. Collecting B roll…. doing a public interest expose” ? lol
Even Judges binge watch Silenceboy, Glen Cerio and Spanky Pants while playing Frauditor Bingo when they get bored!!
@@henryhenrison7122 He only acted obnoxious toward the guy that was filming him, when he called him a punk but that guy has no authority to be trying to boss people around anyway and was being obnoxious by trying to so fuck him.
He never acted obnoxious toward the police or security. Never resorted to name calling or taunting them like other 1st amendment auditors that I've seen. And even if he was being obnoxious - that's not a crime and there is no law which prohibits being "obnoxious". Calling someone obnoxious is in itself being obnoxious, it's just another form of name calling and it's based 100% on your opinion.
Define obnoxious because my opinion is that he wasn't being obnoxious. In fact he was doing all of us a favor by keeping people honest and showing them that there will be consequences for violating our rights. I bet they won't do that again but even if they do, there will be consequences again and possibly even heavier fines because there was a prior incident and they should have known better.
@@liquidbraino Hope he got prison- This people need meds
I was 30 seconds into the video and just started applauding. Well said buddy!!!!!
I've watched thousands of these videos and can count on one hand the number of times a cop stop another cop from violating a citizen's rights.
That's how cops get banished. They don't dare violate the Blue Brotherhood bullshit. It supercedes everything. Forget about oaths, Forget morals or law. When it comes to it, nothing else matters to them because they seek the constant reassurance the other law breakers provide. They live in a vacuum. An echo chamber. Nothing matters but their fellow cops and eventual retirement. And as long as you can never be held responsible, thanks to the unions and qualified immunity, and dishonest prosecutors and judges, they are free to reign tyranny on the public with impunity.
If you were a mafioso would you tell your boss to stop punching someone because it violates some policy ? This is a large gang that works for investors and big business, if you think of them as a gang then alot of things slot into place.
So if the courts ruled that there was no probable cause for the arrest how can the cops then claim QI which requires probable cause to qualify for immunity?
Until we apply QI properly and require officers to carry personal liability insurance the tyranny and stupidity will never end.
Fantastic job by Stray Dog! Much respect.
THANK YOU CITIZEN MR DOG.....FOR STANDING TALL AND GOING ALL THE WAY
There are no rules where big money is involved, there's always a loophole, a vested interest with their hand on the scale, bought off officials.
prove it
@@arushford
Why, have you just arrived from under your rock on Mars?
Also, this is YT not a college degree.
"Hand on the scale" is such a beautiful metaphor ! I have never heard that before !
@@fractal_mind562 Funny, considering it's an allegory, not a metaphor.
I once had a cop tell me they know the Constitution better than most lawyers- obviously not.
The only reason he was convicted the first time was due to the company owning the judge via campaign money. Corporations have far too much power in America.
The attorney for the city is as big of an idiot as the officers. "You never intended to provide your ID, DID YOU!!!!?" Like he really got him there! Anyone who doesn't intend to provide their ID MUST BE GUILTY!
I agreed with you, those city attorneys are idiot, what about judges in the magistrate court? We called those ass hole?
It always grinds my gears when a highly accomplished professional like an attorney or a judge acts like they got a lobotomy.
@@wouldntyouliketoknow1477 they're puppets. That's why babyrapers get to walk but you can't refuse to ID yourself because a stormtrooper commands it.
The city prosecutor got Stray Dog to admit that the only reason he didn't provide ID was to stand up for his rights... as if that's a petty or frivolous reason! I think that salient fact completely makes Stray Dog's case. He didn't refuse to ID to avoid being identified for outstanding warrants or a prior crime. He did exactly what he repeatedly tried to explain to the cops who illegally arrested him. He refused to identify himself because he had committed no crime and they had no reasonable articulable suspicion.
The attorney for the city is an even bigger criminal than the cops. They're just evil cowards and if you hurt their feelings they will make s*** up and try to charge you with it. To serve and protect????? Sounds like that cop was really protecting that man's rights!
This was amazing, the details All the way to the court's decision. Talk about an education..
There's so much wrong from those so called law enforcement officers from this audit, it would be too long to say. It's ashame that they are so ignorant of the law or they just don't care but they beg for qualified immunity when they know they are in the wrong. So many lawsuits that are so clear that it takes so long when it shouldn't. No reason why he should not win this suit. Can't wait to see the outcome for Stray Dog.
My opinion Lacklusters channel is the most educational in many ways.
The civil rights paperwork was filed 1 /1/2 yrs ago and one day ago you said . "Can't wait to see the outcome for Stray Dog" . Something does not pass my smell test.
Those cops had no clue what was going on, They were so bent on getting as ID it was like crack to them, I hope the judge does the right thing and disqualifies their immunity For the officers, They had no clue About the Constitution law when it comes to filming, Stray dog did a really great job and I'm looking forward to more of his audits
SALUTE to Stray dog AND his attorney!!! I LOVE how the attorney asked why he wanted to know about his name and how dog didn't pay that BS about this makes for a good target.
I take my hat off to this gentleman! Well done sir!
That female cop had no clue about any laws. It's good he's suing them.
I think the male cop was just as bad if not worse. He was so adamant that he was correct. Which reflects either a terrible understanding of the law or even worse a blatant disregard for the public's rights. I'm not even American I am Australian and as the auditor stated to many people have died to protect those rights. From your country and mine, and as an active ADF member I would happily stand alongside my american brothers to defend our freedoms.
I’m so tired of seeing cops who think they can arrest you for failure to ID. Do they seriously think that their badge gives them the right to know the name, date of birth, address, height, and whatever other info is on a license of ANY and EVERY citizen? They seriously think they get to just demand ID from anyone for any reason? What the actual F***
Think they can?
But they actually can, and do often. And like in this case, the court backs it up.
You'd think with all the incidents when cops failed by asking for ID without probable cause they'd retrain them or send out a memo or something to get the news out by now. But they continue to behave as per usual and no changes have been made thereby continuously violating citizens rights! It's ridiculous. THEY work FOR us! Not against us. They need to stop perceiving and disrespecting every innocent citizens abiding the law or even those committing misdemeanors as human beings not like were common thugs! What training taught them that this is okay? That this is how they're supposed to approach us? They sure as hell better get seriously reformed or eventually precincts will go bankrupt. Oh but the President wants to give them MORE funds? Wtf? It better be to retrain these idiots or else there will be hell to pay. People are woke and will no longer tolerate being disrespected! Lying and falsely charging us for petty crimes or crimes we never committed. And don't get me started on why we need to defund them. Just ask yourself~ why is it that every single traffic stop or event require back up, typically involving 3-5 cop cars? For what? To stand around and play witness? That's a waste of our tax dollars and a clear indication that there's not enough crime or work for them to do if any given car can drop what theyre doing (most likely eating donuts) and run over to cover back up on a simple traffic stop with a burnt our tail light. Give me a freakin break! I'm surprised this issue hasn't been investigated already. Its definitely valid and occurring at alarming rates. Its because they are required to meet quotas and need to lie to account for their wasted time doing nothing. It's infuriating!!
Magic words: Law suit.
This man and his lawyers are heroes.
The fact that these cops added charges after the fact that they’re not being prosecuted for malicious violation of this man’s well-being has me completely befuddled how are these cops able to knowingly intentionally destroy peoples lives against law and then walk away without any charges is an absolute travesty
Don’t see how they can claim to be operating in good faith when they added every contempt of cop charge they could to justify their poor decision.
I’ve seen people be let go without charge when the cops realise they fucked up and I could at least understand their argument for good faith ignorance.
That’s exactly who law enfarsers are.
They call it the "thin blue line" like it's just a way to say they protect each other while violating flag code by desecrating our flag. But it's so much deeper than that because it's the fraternal order of police protecting them! And the masons are at the root of every problem in this Satanic corrupt world! They own everything & everyone! The bad guys never play to lose & that's what's WRONG!!!
It's the inversion of reality. Everything is backwards, upside down & inside out. Good is evil & evil is good, wrong is right & right is wrong.
They are the ONLY real terrorist to invade America...I call em BLUE !$!$ & they need to be eliminated from society!!!
CELLPHONE NUT,AND IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD AN ATTORNEY YOUR GUILTY AND YOU HAVE A RECORD
File restraining orders. Cops hate thise.
This auditor wins his court case, and I believe that he filed a lawsuit.
Why oh why aren’t cops educated in the rights of citizens . The bill of rights state clearly what is our freedoms and cops should know this forward , backward , inside , outside and upside down . Qualified immunity is the go to card to protect the ignorance of the laws all LEOs have sworn an oath to uphold. I say do away with the oath altogether if it is forgotten as soon as recited . It means nothing apparently . Just ask any LEOs to recite their oath and wait for response. I wonder how many could recite the pledge of allegiance ?
Because time on the range or at Dunkin Donuts is more fun? Cops are poorly trained because of poor oversight, the bad (or damaged) people who become police, etc
That case should have never gotten past the first magistrate. Unbelievable that he was originally found guilty when the whole thing is right there on video.
17:22 So, when you get annoyed because people, some in uniform, are trying to deprive you of your rights, the court calls you OBNOXIOUS? The cops are the obnoxious ones here. Collecting tax money for a job they have no clue of how to do, is a disgrace. #whatajokeofacountry
To be fair, you can use your tights obnoxiously. He’s clearly doing this as a test to see if they’ll violate his rights (Hence the audit), and they failed their audit, but obnoxious is the name of the game.
It’s crazy that law enforcement will post pictures right away of someone who was incarcerated, but will take ages to report someone missing! I’ve seen it first hand! Thank you for this!
From my perspective, anytime and auditor or other persons specifically warn officers that they are violating or about to violate your rights, or if they warned the officer to get a supervisor, and they are about to make a big mistake, like you did in this video, all claims to immunity should be null and void. They shouldn't get to claim ignorance when they were warned.
It's all about accountability. If I screw up at my job, I'm held accountable. If a cop screws up, he/she should be held accountable.
I hope one or more of these cops get fired. I love when auditors get cops fired.
@ Kevin Duffy
Fire right in the face. Out the back of the skull
I'm willing to bet they got a pat on the back and a job well done for trampling his constitutional rights.
its sad that WE have to constantly educate the cops at every turn...
THANK YOU for your work here
Good work Stray. Thanks for standing up for our rights. You rock!
Thank you so much for what you do. I am sorry that you have to go through this just to defend your constitutional rights as well as mine!
If that male or female police officer is ignorant of the law he or she should be either fired or have to go back to school.
Fired deffo…
It's great that you are following up these arrests with litigation and reporting it.
It still never ceases to surprise me when watching cops insisting that citizens have to provide ID when they haven’t even committed a crime. It then makes me even more pi**ed off when the cops arrest a citizen for not producing ID with no crime, but then they make up bogus charges when they realise they’ve made a mistake (in order to justify their utter incompetence)☹
And the judge then says "guilty" and the man has to spend years of his life fighting the charges... No punishment for the officers involved or for the judge who sentenced him... The law doesn't work for us, it works for the companies paying their wages. We need a police service that protects against federal law, a people funded policing system that actually protects people. The funny thing is it would be deemed a terrorist act and labeled as a "mafia"... Actually protecting citizens is illegal in America.
@@fractal_mind562 i am beginning to think we need private law enforment officers that are less likely to become corupt
Terrific video and incredibly important to watch. Thank you for exercising and protecing civil rights in the U.S.
Did he literally just tell thr judge "Because I'm like a stray dog - I answer to any name, I come and go when I please, and I pee wherever I want."?? Pretty sure I want this guy to be my dad.