I red the book 60 years, love Russian Literature, I am I can see now this adaptation very complex history about God, family and life. Thank you for showing
My mom worked as housekeeper for a writer when I was a boy. He had grand library. Doskyosky's crime and punishment was the first of his novels I read. I have been a fan of good Russian literature since. Read brothers Karamazov some time later, fantastic to see the movie 🎉
Thanks for uploading this! For those seeing it, please also read the novel itself. This filmatisation, although excellent in many ways, miss some crucial elements, such as the Grand Inquisitor, Merkel and and Zosima being a counterpoint to Ivan's nihilism, Guschenka's opening via the tale of the onion, Mitya climbing over the fence and hitting Grigory (imprortant later). and more. So my advise is to use them together.
Yes I am reading the book and watching film and interesting to see what is left out. It seems to me the spiritual element is glossed over. I am just reading the bit where Alyosha has his vision after Zosima dies and that does not feature at all. Nevertheless great to watch the film and to have access to Russian cinema.
@@artiefountThe grand inquisitor would probably require building its own sets, hiring its own actors and wasting a lot fo money to adapt it right, otherwise it would just be Ivan telling a story to the camera. You do it right, or you don't do it at all. They chose the later.
It is a good adaptation but not perfect. Costumes, scenery is on point. Acting is good (though Alyosha's actor has the weakest performance, he failed a bit) The have left a whole lot of stuff out, but I understand why, books is long, 1100 pages. It is not as deep and subtle as the original. But this movie is already over 4 hours. You would need at least 12 hours to do that. So it should be a long TV series
First time watching this film, after reading the novel a second time. I absolutely love how well the characters were portrayed (the exaggerated pathos just works so well). I knew going into it that it would be a *beast* of a book to capture the philosophical depth of in a film. At least to me, it generally struck the right balance, even if it skimmed over a *lot* around Zosima. Mikhail Ulyanov did a great job capturing the manic abandon of Dmitri. The soundtrack is also incredible...wish I could find it as a playlist, but it's been hard to track down.
@@ПавелАфанасьев-м2т Sarà la terza volta che lo rileggo nella vita... E confido che lo leggano anche quelli più giovani di me. O almeno spero, vista l'ignoranza generale ormai. Ciao
@@pebs429Ciao, no, per qualche motivo non volevo leggere questo libro, quindi l'ho visto e ho deciso di dargli un'occhiata. Sicuramente non lo leggo tre volte (per qualche motivo non esiste una cosa del genere) ma per i giovani probabilmente tutto dipende dalla loro educazione.
Sergei Vronsky's Cinematographic efforts really shine outside. I wish they had managed to incorporate exteriors or real locations into the films more. Not so much a fan of the very stage-y interior house scenes (amazingly dramatic writing from the source material notwithstanding). But every time they do go outside it is such a treat!
Hello Mosfilm , it’s very great initiative that you are showing to the world from Russian original film archive. It is time I think we can see many great film and experiment done early like from Eisentein , lev Khuleshov etc . Also it would be good idea if there is any film critic from Moscow who can explain those time period and analyze a bit …
Yes. We need to remember, and even venerate the great Russian film classics by Eisenstein, Khuleshov, Bondarchuk which I've seen in the theatre -- remember seeing movies in the theatre ? -- with a live responsive audience. Everything else is just a simulacrum. A film critic from Moscow? I caught a rare showing of Eisenstein's Alexander Nevsky some years ago @ the Pacific Film Archive in Berkeley presented by a fantastic young Russian who was working for the state film archive but don't alas recall his name.
And since it was sent as the USSR’s submition for best foreign film at the Oscars, it might have been a cut scene to avoid criticism from the Roman Catholic west… just a guess
Bu filme 15 yawimda baxmiwdim indi 54 yawdayam cox gozeldi kometlerde yazirlarki mekan sahne zeifdir Nezrre alinki film 1968ci ilde cekilib ve cox profisional seviyede .Sovet kinosunun incisidir bu film🎉❤
In the hands of any other director, this would be a telenovela with philosophy mixed in. But they get away with the emotional intensity here. You watch and can't stop watching the train wreck.
2:28 (where we left off in part 1) 3:00 a song on the guitar played by Pavel Fyodorovich 6:15 Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov, brother of Alexei and Dimitri Karamozov 10:42 Perfect idiot! Terrible scoundrel! 11:23 Waking a drunk man
Kudos. This is fantastic. Such great attention paid to historical detail here: I am astonished at how they captured the poor dentistry of 19th century Russia.
I agree! And Alyosha's acting here is my least favorite. Ivan looks too old but by the end of the movie, his actor gave such a performance that I liked him anyway. Alyosha is just giving deer in the headlights in every scene here. Combined with the omission of his side plots with Lise and the boys, and the absence of his interbal monologue, his represtation in this version is lacking.
The three brothers are much younger than these actors. Dimitri is 28 and Ivan 24, according to the book. Anyway, great work from all of them in my opinion.
It is a good adaptation but not perfect. Costumes, scenery is on point. Acting is good (though Alyosha's actor has the weakest performance, he failed a bit) The have left a whole lot of stuff out, but I understand why, books is long, 1100 pages. It is not as deep and subtle as the original. But this movie is already over 4 hours. You would need at least 12 hours to do that. So it should be a long TV series
None else can have portrayed that part of a Pharisee's pursued atleast a disciple tried force return Leader's back to their Jewish folds but failed miserably takes New life...
I don't get the positive reviews. I think this film is dreadful. The acting reminds me of the histrionics in silent movies. If you didn't read the book, the script would make no sense at all. And having read the book makes the movie even worse.!So much left out, not just incidents, but the philosophical discussion. The Brother Karamozov is as much a book of philosophy as a family drama.
BTW if you do read the book you'll see that hysteria plays a big role in the narration and heroes often act hysterically (this is Dostoyevsky's feature), so this one is just a homage to the book itself.
that;s the thing...aren't we all ? in a philosophical way...with our own thoughts , and dreaming ...and "problems" and come on..look around what society looks like today.
I red the book 60 years, love Russian Literature, I am I can see now this adaptation very complex history about God, family and life. Thank you for showing
I'm doing research on it.
So great to see this adaptation available on TH-cam.
My mom worked as housekeeper for a writer when I was a boy. He had grand library. Doskyosky's crime and punishment was the first of his novels I read. I have been a fan of good Russian literature since. Read brothers Karamazov some time later, fantastic to see the movie 🎉
Hadnt read Crime... Karamasov shocked me though. Greatbook.
I love this film. Characters are all superb. Musics and voices are amazing. This novel is excellently transferred into active world
Thanks for uploading this! For those seeing it, please also read the novel itself. This filmatisation, although excellent in many ways, miss some crucial elements, such as the Grand Inquisitor, Merkel and and Zosima being a counterpoint to Ivan's nihilism, Guschenka's opening via the tale of the onion, Mitya climbing over the fence and hitting Grigory (imprortant later). and more. So my advise is to use them together.
What a shame Zosimas’ dialogue and the Grand Inquisitor (masterpiece!) are missing. Those are deep reflections of the authors’s heart and mind!
Yes I am reading the book and watching film and interesting to see what is left out. It seems to me the spiritual element is glossed over. I am just reading the bit where Alyosha has his vision after Zosima dies and that does not feature at all. Nevertheless great to watch the film and to have access to Russian cinema.
@@artiefountThe grand inquisitor would probably require building its own sets, hiring its own actors and wasting a lot fo money to adapt it right, otherwise it would just be Ivan telling a story to the camera. You do it right, or you don't do it at all. They chose the later.
@@oleggorky906 There is a filmatisation from 2009 that does this better I think. Available on DVD but also on TH-cam.
@@patrik_bergmanI think we need to remember that the Soviets had their own agenda in adapting Dostoevsky, their goals could hardly be more different..
Perfect adaptation of one of my favorite novels
It’s not perfect but I haven’t seen a better dramatic version.
@@aclark903 i would say a better adaptation is impossible as we are farer and farer away from those times.
It is a good adaptation but not perfect. Costumes, scenery is on point. Acting is good (though Alyosha's actor has the weakest performance, he failed a bit) The have left a whole lot of stuff out, but I understand why, books is long, 1100 pages. It is not as deep and subtle as the original. But this movie is already over 4 hours. You would need at least 12 hours to do that. So it should be a long TV series
@tj-co9go why do you regard Alyosha's performance as the weakest?
First time watching this film, after reading the novel a second time. I absolutely love how well the characters were portrayed (the exaggerated pathos just works so well).
I knew going into it that it would be a *beast* of a book to capture the philosophical depth of in a film. At least to me, it generally struck the right balance, even if it skimmed over a *lot* around Zosima. Mikhail Ulyanov did a great job capturing the manic abandon of Dmitri.
The soundtrack is also incredible...wish I could find it as a playlist, but it's been hard to track down.
Masterpiece. 💫✨️
The cast is wonderful!! Thank you!
❤❤thank you for making it possible to see this masterpiece 🙏 ❤
Brilliant story and film making.
Great casting wonderful performance. Karamsoves!
Grazie! Ho appena finito di rileggere il libro ed ecco che compare questo film!
Quanti anni hai?
@@ПавелАфанасьев-м2т Più di 50, purtroppo...
Perché?
@@pebs429È interessante sapere a che ora le ragazze leggono questo tipo di letteratura) e così via in generale. Grazie.
@@ПавелАфанасьев-м2т Sarà la terza volta che lo rileggo nella vita... E confido che lo leggano anche quelli più giovani di me. O almeno spero, vista l'ignoranza generale ormai.
Ciao
@@pebs429Ciao, no, per qualche motivo non volevo leggere questo libro, quindi l'ho visto e ho deciso di dargli un'occhiata. Sicuramente non lo leggo tre volte (per qualche motivo non esiste una cosa del genere) ma per i giovani probabilmente tutto dipende dalla loro educazione.
Sergei Vronsky's Cinematographic efforts really shine outside. I wish they had managed to incorporate exteriors or real locations into the films more. Not so much a fan of the very stage-y interior house scenes (amazingly dramatic writing from the source material notwithstanding). But every time they do go outside it is such a treat!
Ovo mi je najdraza knjiga ikad, Dostojevskog je veoma tesko svesti u okvire filma...obozavam Mitju Karamazova
Hello Mosfilm , it’s very great initiative that you are showing to the world from Russian original film archive. It is time I think we can see many great film and experiment done early like from Eisentein , lev Khuleshov etc . Also it would be good idea if there is any film critic from Moscow who can explain those time period and analyze a bit …
Good idea!!
Interesting adaptation. Impressive music as well. Thanks for the upload.
Yes. We need to remember, and even venerate the great Russian film classics by Eisenstein, Khuleshov, Bondarchuk which I've seen in the theatre -- remember seeing movies in the theatre ? -- with a live responsive audience. Everything else is just a simulacrum. A film critic from Moscow? I caught a rare showing of Eisenstein's Alexander Nevsky some years ago @ the Pacific Film Archive in Berkeley presented by a fantastic young Russian who was working for the state film archive but don't alas recall his name.
He told amusing stories about Prokofiev's working relationship with Eisenstein.
Mosfilms! Russian films are the best !! Thanks for making them free to enjoy!!!
This is marvelous. Thank you for uploading it.
표도르 아저씨 연기 너무 잘하고 귀여우세요
I am sorry for we couldnt see Liza in this movie. I ve wondered about her and Alyoshka's relationship.
exactly. And the boy who bit Alyosha's finger... that part is also missing
@@mrquestionare. there's a separate movie on this part of the novel, its title is Мальчики.
I wish the film would have included Ivan’s Grand Inquisitor
A very significant omission, isn’t it.
Agreed, in saying that, having just finished part 1, I’m simultaneously impressed at how they’ve pulled it off.
And since it was sent as the USSR’s submition for best foreign film at the Oscars, it might have been a cut scene to avoid criticism from the Roman Catholic west… just a guess
thank you!!
Bu filme 15 yawimda baxmiwdim indi 54 yawdayam cox gozeldi kometlerde yazirlarki mekan sahne zeifdir Nezrre alinki film 1968ci ilde cekilib ve cox profisional seviyede .Sovet kinosunun incisidir bu film🎉❤
In the hands of any other director, this would be a telenovela with philosophy mixed in. But they get away with the emotional intensity here. You watch and can't stop watching the train wreck.
2:28 (where we left off in part 1)
3:00 a song on the guitar played by Pavel Fyodorovich
6:15 Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov, brother of Alexei and Dimitri Karamozov
10:42 Perfect idiot! Terrible scoundrel!
11:23 Waking a drunk man
Spasibo
Share us the movie "Подросток" please with Ташков, Ташкова and Борисов.
Kudos. This is fantastic. Such great attention paid to historical detail here: I am astonished at how they captured the poor dentistry of 19th century Russia.
It's just that dentistry in 60-ies in Soviet Russia were nothing better.
Isso é bom demais!
does anyone know what song Pavel plays with his guitar?
Part 2 🎦
Words can describe that type of the world and that civilisations because that's doesn't exist anymore.
It's a pity Allyusha's actor looks abit too old! Although he looks a lot younger on his scene with Grushenka. Also Grushenka is hhhnnnggg!!!!!
I agree! And Alyosha's acting here is my least favorite. Ivan looks too old but by the end of the movie, his actor gave such a performance that I liked him anyway. Alyosha is just giving deer in the headlights in every scene here. Combined with the omission of his side plots with Lise and the boys, and the absence of his interbal monologue, his represtation in this version is lacking.
The three brothers are much younger than these actors. Dimitri is 28 and Ivan 24, according to the book. Anyway, great work from all of them in my opinion.
@@paulagrimoldi9699 don't forget that at that time and in harsh russian climate people age earlier.
It is a good adaptation but not perfect. Costumes, scenery is on point. Acting is good (though Alyosha's actor has the weakest performance, he failed a bit) The have left a whole lot of stuff out, but I understand why, books is long, 1100 pages. It is not as deep and subtle as the original. But this movie is already over 4 hours. You would need at least 12 hours to do that. So it should be a long TV series
None else can have portrayed that part of a Pharisee's pursued atleast a disciple tried force return Leader's back to their Jewish folds but failed miserably takes New life...
what is the name of the singer and of the song, the slow song with the guitar at 1:05:00
The singer is Rada Volshaninova, just found out
Great Inquisitor missing earlier on.
❤
दयाल 🌨️🌳🦚🌈🌨️🌳🌨️
Don't watch if you're Americans or English. It will be beyond your Atheistic understanding.
Americans are not atheistic. Most religious nation ever.
This book brought this atheist American to Holy Orthodoxy. Glory to God!
@@Saint_John_The_Forerunner whom?
@@gaHuJIa_Macmep Me
@@gaHuJIa_Macmep Me
I don't get the positive reviews. I think this film is dreadful. The acting reminds me of the histrionics in silent movies. If you didn't read the book, the script would make no sense at all. And having read the book makes the movie even worse.!So much left out, not just incidents, but the philosophical discussion. The Brother Karamozov is as much a book of philosophy as a family drama.
It's just too difficult to squeeze such a huge book into a movie.
BTW if you do read the book you'll see that hysteria plays a big role in the narration and heroes often act hysterically (this is Dostoyevsky's feature), so this one is just a homage to the book itself.
👍🏻🤝🏻🤝🏻💎👌🏻💫💰💖🙋♀️🇵🇪1/8/24.
it is so funny, how bad the Russian movie, they dont how to do it
why is the acting so terrible? it's like a silent film.....
I think it is quite good
They all overact in Russian movies
It suits the novel, Dostojevski is a little melodramatic
The acting is superb. You’re not used to expressive theatrical acting. It’s old school. Plus Dmitriy is a quirky character. Wild, but a pure soul.
Отличная игра.
Ciekawy byl ten nasz polski oficerek.😢
Агриппину должна играть была другая актриса, а не Лионела Пырьева ,не верю, как говорил Станиславский.
Жену свою протаскивал.. А зря..
Грушенька по книге нежнее и красивее. А в эту ..так безумно влюбиться.. трудно даже представить..
прекрасно сыграла Лионелла Пырьквп, не пишите чушь, никто её ни в одной экранизации не превзошёл! @@vsirrmk
These people are all insane.
Such was the author who had mental problems.
that;s the thing...aren't we all ? in a philosophical way...with our own thoughts , and dreaming ...and "problems" and come on..look around what society looks like today.
@@dariusstan1357 no, i am not insane, for instance.
@@gaHuJIa_Macmep ok
That’s it „for instance“😉