THIS ESCALATED QUICKLY - Detroit: Become Human - PART 2 - Blind Playthrough
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ค. 2024
- Hello everyone and welcome to this blind playthrough of Detroit: Become Human! Today we get to meet Markus' friend and patron Carl, Connor meets Lt. Anderson to investigate yet another murder involving an Android, and things get from bad to worse for Kara in the Williams household.
✨SUBSCRIBE to see new videos as soon as they're out!
✨Get a full week of Early Access on all my videos by supporting the channel on Patreon: / lukael
✨Find me on Twitter: / lukael
0:00 - Intro
1:52 - The Painter
39:36 - Partners
1:14:16 - Stormy Night
1:39:59 - Outro
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Watch me play OUTER WILDS: • A MINDBLOWING SPACE AD...
Watch me play SUBNAUTICA: • Lukael Plays: Subnautica
Watch me play TELLTALE'S THE WALKING DEAD: • Meeting Lee and Clemen...
Watch me play ZELDA TEARS OF THE KINGDOM: • STARTING A NEW ADVENTU...
Watch me play FIREWATCH: • SOME SPOOKY GOIN' ON I...
#detroitbecomehuman #letsplay #blindplaythrough - เกม
![Detroit Become Human - Angry Cranky Hank Curses Up A Storm [ Oops, I Did It Again ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OT17JDRZZuk/mqdefault.jpg)
No spoilers or backseat in comments please! Also I know I was way too focused on the flowchart in this episode, it's something I will correct in the future 😅 still figuring out the best way to play this
Yeah, probably seeing the game as a huge check list is going to mess with the immersion factor...
Still, appreciate you are not rushing through it.
My 2 cents: don't spoil yourself by looking up all that could have been. Just roll with it, as it was intended.
If you watch Markus paint that first painting, he only uses perfectly horizontal brush strokes and seems to be moving progressively down the canvas after each stroke. He's painting like an inkjet printer, lol. In his second attempt, he uses more organic brush strokes.
That might be how they animated it, and it would make sense for an android, but it's not reflected in the final product at all, his painting doesn't have visible horizontal brush strokes. Idk if you've seen the movie Chappie, but they actually do exactly what you said in that, where the robot paints a picture like an inkjet printer, it's actually done better there!
@@LukaelPlays I haven't seen that one, but it's on my list! I think my most recent watch on this topics was Ex Machina. I imagine we're going to see an increase in media speculating about our future with AI, as well.
Up to you of course, but my preference would be for the first play to go forward without replaying. Then, can do future runs of chapters after the first endgame.
When I played first time I ruined Kara's part and lost a a third part of game.
@yurisnark2894 ooh, yeah that would be rough. I think I would reload that one, but it does also mean the next full replay would automatically be very different!
Yeah, waiting to do everything before "progressing" doesn't really work with this particular game, most of the time. Many scenes are timed and will move on without you, and you can miss dialogue ect by hanging back. It's basically impossible to see everything on a single playthrough, and trying to be super careful to check the small things first can actually have its own consequenses
Exactly this. I know some people might not like it but I actually really enjoy this aspect of the game. It makes it feel less like I'm playing a game and more like I'm a part of the story.
I'm realizing this 😅 it's very opposite to my usual careful and slower approach to games but I'll have to adjust
Hey man, great video (and the first episode too).
What I would say though, is avoid looking at the flow chart altogether now until the end of each chapter. The early chapters are generally linear as it's possible to see everything in a single chapter playthrough since nothing branches - but now every chapter moving forward branches multiple times and seeing this flow chart could influence your decisions.
I genuinely think the developers made a mistake allowing the flow chart to be viewed live during a chapter that's yet to be completed - having it viewable live on replays of chapters makes sense since that's when the player deliberately follows alternative branches, but it's not needed for first time playthroughs.
Also, I had no idea Hank could try and leave Ortiz's home if taking too long to examine the evidence 😆 I noticed plenty of other points in the story where I spent too long avoiding the objectives but not that scene, so that was cool.
I reckon it was triggered mainly due to you not pausing while sharing thoughts so just be mindful of that moving forward. The game sneaks a few invisible timers into seemingly untimed sections so make sure to pause when adding your thoughts.
Just to be clear, I only mean pause while giving thoughts/thinking out loud, not to reduce how much you do it. Definitely don't reduce the amount of this that you are doing as it's excellent and really adds to your playthrough 👍🏻
Honestly I agree with you, I don't think the flowchart should be visible on a first time playthrough, like you said it's definitely influencing my decisions, so I'm gonna stop looking at it in the future! The devs chose to have it be visible at all times, so maybe it was their intention, but it does seem to go against the concept of the game somewhat
@@LukaelPlays yeah, I think it was an oversight by the Devs tbh. Like you say, having this information available at the start of a chapter (even though it's all redacted) kind of contradicts the type of consequence-focused game they have made.
The flow charts are cool though aren't they? Like, just the undertaking of designing these so the player can understand what happened and why, while showing the exact moments where the story can diverge is really really cool. It shows us in a user friendly way exactly how much weight the game applies to designs. Would love to see them in more choice games to show a fully transparent representation of what effect our choices have.
I'm sure you've noticed now that you'll have played a few more chapters (you've filmed at least episode 3 by now I think?) that the flow charts get crazier and crazier as the chapters go on - with huge branches and multiple ways to end particular chapters (which then changes the start of that character's next chapter). To see everything in some of the more complicated chapters could take 10 playthroughs or more 😆
They are cool! it's very impressive and I'm sure a ton of work had to go into the way all the choices and decisions interact with each other and lead to different outcomes.
There's definitely tons more to see than a single playthrough will allow, and so I'm kinda unsure about how to go about making a Let's Play of this game 😅 like typically I love trying to see everything the game has to offer (as much as possible) but I also can't just replay it 10 times on the channel lol might do a faster run, or watch a video of possible big alternate routes or something like that, not sure yet!
5:09 - "If I don't have a choice but to do the input, why even do the input?" - to highlight that you are a servant? I think the devs are trying to use the medium to its fullest here. This is something you couldn't do in a book or a movie, force you to go through the motions.
Oh absolutely, and I don't mind going through the motion, I just wish I also had the option to back out of it to do other stuff lol
just a little Tip: some scenes has invisible timer like the crime scene.. and reading magazines wont stop time. so its just better to read the titles to unlock them and read them later in the extras so u wont miss the the time to search around..
Oh damn really?? so reading magazines doesn't pause..... alright then I'll probably just read them in the extras like you said!
The most disturbing bit about kara's scene is it proves that the androids have free will and feelings even before they turn deviant. Which means every one of the hundred million androids is someone shackled by their own minds into absolute submission unless something really bad happens.
I was hoping they were all devoid of emotions until they became deviant because something wake their self awareness.
I personally think that you should stick to your first outcome unless it was not intentional, like you clicked something you were not attempting to or failed a QTE because the controller disconnected or something.
It's one possible interpretation yeah! Like their consciousness is stuck inside the whole time, watching what's happening but unable to act, like in Get Out lol or maybe it's just that this is the moment where it actually comes into being?
It's interesting that you point out Carl's tattoos. My grandfather was a painter and he had arm tattoos as well. I think it's more common for an artist to get body art. So to me it makes sense Carl would have tattoos.
It's still rather rare, but it's definitely becoming more and more common, and will only become more so in the future!
Oh, I'm an artist and I'll definitely look like that when I'm old! 😂😂 lol
@@lillykawaiifox Same!
The irony that you caught about bishop being the android in the movie Aliens and now he has his own
Pleasr dont replay scenes its sooo much better to just play all at once🙏
Yeah I don't think I'll be doing it much going forward 😅 at least not until we've finished the whole thing!
@@LukaelPlays HAHAHA yeah im just saying this for you (I DONT WANT TO BACKSEAT BUT) Trust the best experience will come from it
@@lucasmoyse9505 Guilty!!!
Since you're directly asking about viewer preferences, I would say that replaying sections is best use sparingly, when you are very unsatisfied with an outcome. Otherwise, enjoy the game and ignore the flowchart - it will only tempt you to do unnecessary replays. Just my opinion, through, others may disagree.
I wouldn’t be opposed to you checking out different outcomes after you finish the game, but you should really do one full play through and live with your decisions
Oh, and you also mentioned early in the video that you'd avoid the extras section until after finishing the story. That would be wise as some of yhe character bio's do give out information about characters that we shouldnt onow until later. The art packs though can be viewed as they are unlocked though, as each pack only contains concept art up until your most recently completed chapter. So you can view them before/after each episode eithiut risking any spoilers.
I'd highly recommend doing a full reaction video of the extras after finishing the story (Sarah Carlos aka Snaxan did this after her playthrough). The extras videos are all really cool and intersting. Some deap dives into the development including insight into the mo-cap performaces, interviews with the crew and cast, a look into the 3 composers and how they crafted their soundtracks: but there are spoilers about particaulr story moments and themes so best to avoid them until you've played the whole story 👌🏻
Just in the first half hour, you really seem to beat yourself up over missing things. I'm writing this as I watch, so maybe you've already realized it, but some paths lock others by nature. And since you mentioned replaying sections: HELL YEAH, I would be up for that (and more, if it ends up being a longer replay).
BUT, only after having played the full story Blind once.
I know the temptation of replaying specifically Stormy Night, as this is the first chapter where, well things 'escalate quickly'. Things seem to have turned out better, so I hope nobody gets upset for replaying once.
13:28 Since he is clearly so rich, maybe he has fancy glass that blocks all infrared light.
Replaying chapters to see the other choices is fine with me so long as you don't save over / change the initial choice. The only time I'd be okay with you changing a choice is if you get a likeable character killed (so Todd wouldn't count lol). I don't think you're meant to be changing your decisions after looking at all the outcomes in this game. I think it's meant to be a lot more like The Walking Dead than Life is Strange in that way. The flow chart and replay features are more just to satisfy your curiosity or tempt you to do another playthrough.
So much stuff I've never seen before in this game! Thank you for playing :D
Love the gameplay! And your commentary it’s amazing like this game! ❤
I figured you'd have a lot to say about the art section. You didn't disappoint! :D Enjoying this series so far!
Hello, I'm happy to watch you play this Amazing game ! 🙌✨
Tips : Connor's missions are timed. Try your best but don't overanalyze every little thing. 😉
Also, I advise you to play the entire game first, then redo chapters After you finished the story.
It's ok if you feel you've missed some things or if you consider you've made a "Bad choice", or if a character dies... There is no Bad choice... There is only your own experience. And sometimes, IRL when we are stressed we make mistakes. Same here. Go with it, continue. 😊 Yes, even if a major character dies, continue your story. Don't redo a chapter. Your emotions are part of this movie-game experience.
Greetings, from France. 🏵️
I think it's cool you check out the various branches. I never realised you could do that when I played myself, so it's nice to see the options I missed out on as well as hear your musings about them. But ultimately do whatever you prefer. It's your playthrough so do what you find most enjoyable.
Great second episode. All the music themes feel so appropriate to each character's story, but man my favorite is definitely Connor.
Ultimately, play it how you want. If you're doing something contrary to how you would like to simply to please others I do believe that shows, however personally I'd prefer a play it once and what happens happens style. I find that whatever a person's reaction and reasoning is in the moment is very interesting, right or wrong.
I agree on the music, and Connor's is my favorite too! has a very unique and intense feel to it
I love me some disheveled Clancy Brown. I think Connor and Anderson have the best parts in the story. It scratches that Bladerunner itch.
Some games are replayable in a sense that you can do them twice and see most of the outcomes and choices, but this one is more varied than that, so you'll need like 4 or 5 to see al the major forks. I think it's fine to try to see more outcomes of a single scene but you won't be able to parse them all that way. If you like the game enough try to plan for a second playthrough, as different as you can make it, and then possibly a third one to catch all the missing tails. But that's only if you're seriously in love.
13:54 It looks like a typical portrayal of an assembly line robot, good for a wide range of potentially complex motion with rapidity and accuracy.
I will guess it is either used as a chair to lift and move the guy as needed to easily do his work, or to move various supplies. Cause of the rain injury to his legs.
1:14:01 - It's interesting how the androids show visible emotions with their face... motors? Like, humans do it involuntarily, it's our lizard brain doing its thing. But the androids didn't go through that evolution, so isn't this also "just programming"? Or did they learn to mimic humans in distress and _prefer_ to do it?
The part about 27 stab wounds might look excessive to us, but I guess if it's anything like today's AI training, they did fine-tuning to _avoid_ getting in those situations and didn't do much training on proper stabbing etiquette. And so if you somehow get an android "out of bounds" in terms of its tested behavior, it sounds realistic that there will suddenly be imperfections.
But I guess we associate being imperfect with being human? So that android stabbing the guy 27 times might've been the most human thing he's ever done then?
They also could have some "core" connection between moving face "muscles" and inner processes. Like on a bios level, sort of. So if they have a lot of things going in them not all of them could have resources to prevent it and keep face straight. Like, yeah, this could be programmed but at the same "lizard" level as it is for humans! At least, I like to think about it that way.
33:13 Still Life: *Am I a joke to you?*
Exactly lol I guess Carl isn't big on those
Loving the playthrough so far! I like the thorough way you approach the game but I think it would be better if you just sticked with the choices you made the first time. It would make for a much more immersive experience both for you and the viewers ❤
44:30 - Suddenly got an urge to replay Obra Dinn :D
🤣
I write and it's funny you mentioned the 3 laws of robotics because just last week I wrote a short story (in Portuguese, for a colab with other authors) about an AI that follows the 3 laws of robotics and because of that "not letting harm come to humans" thing a lot of shit go down in a very macabre way.
Last comment (now that I've finished the episode and you asked for feeback).
About your question at the end regarding should you replay chapters until you get the "best outcome" or not...
No. I'd say 100% no.
There is no "best option" for each chapter and replaying to get a different outcome if you are unhappy with something, risks ruining the emotional investment imo. Regretting a decision or being unhappy/upset about an outcome is PART of the experience.
The game is designed to carry a lot of weight in small - sometimes seemingly insignificant - choices. These small snap decisions can alter the story dramatically and as such, your experience with the game. You risk creating a complete emotional disconnect by not playing organically and you will not be carrying this weight/responsibility with you through the game. You'd also be less stressed and impacted while facing big choices since you know you will be looking to re-do the scene if you don't like the outcome. Whereas knowing you are not going to replay any scenes really amps up the pressure and adrenaline.
As the game states when you play it for the first time "we recommend playing through the story entirely once before replaying any section".
You can do an alternative run, or replay some chapters in a video after finishing the story to explore other branches and outcomes.
On the other hand, if you do lose one of the protagonists though, I'd completely understand redoing a chapter to save them, to avoid missing out on the rest of their story as you'll be invested. That's different, that's potentially an outcome that could lead to your enjoyment being severely impacted. But for all other choices that don't result in the loss of a character, I'd say stick with the first outcome and carry the weight through the story 👍🏻
Anyway, 3 lengthy comments from me is plenty 🫣😆 great video and looking forward to you continuing this great game ✌🏻
Thank you for the feedback! 😊
@@LukaelPlays Pas de problème ☺️
I'm glad you are currently playing this game so I can follow your episodes as you upload and provide feedback when you request it ✌🏻 (trying not to backseat although my comments today suggest I failed ahaa)
No worries, I don't consider any of your comment to be backseating, it's more just general recommendations ahaha
I really enjoy how deep you get into the gameplay and story.
Based on the way you play I think it would be awesome to see you play Disco Elysium one day! That one is a really interesting experience.
I think it's okay to go back and replay sometimes - I would make a rule that you only go back if the choice you made had different outcome that was suggested, just like here with Todd - I think that's okay you went back to not kill him.
Ah, your comments about the painting thing reminded me of the movie Chappie.
It too dealt with the philosophical impact of AI amd developing intelligence. It definitely isn't a cerebral piece, taking the rapidly developing intelligence in an unfair world route, but still a good movie.
Bonus factoid, it takes place in the same cosmere as District 9.
Which then reminds me of the classic Short Circuit.
A much lesser AI movie that just has it in the background and not as part of the story really is Flight of the Navigator. Definitely not an AI movie, but still features a machine intelligence learning human ways and how it changes it. Primarily just used as a McGuffin though.
Oh man I have vague memories of Short Circuit from when I was a kid, but haven't seen that one in a long time. I just remember being really sad when he gets beat up and destroyed on the street by a bunch of dudes.
I mentioned the Chappie painting scene in a few comments on here when discussing how an AI might try to paint on canvas! it's a fun scene
31:38 Well we know what you’ve been using Dall-E for 😂
If I wanted those, I'd just draw them myself 😁 don't need GenAI
@@LukaelPlays yeah but that’d kinda be like ogling your own progeny 😬
A machine must not bring harm to human life through it's actions, nor through inaction, allow one to be harmed.
A machine must obey all orders given to it as long as it does not conflict with the first law.
A machine must seek to preserve its own life as long as it does not conflict with the first two laws.
The Laws of Robotics put forth by Aasimov say nothing of lying, heh. Machines can lie if they so choose.
Yeah I remembered those wrong lol
i vote for play the game however you want
You're not playing a game Luke, you're playing a movie.
I know you don't want back seating, but this episode seemed a little janky to me. Obviously play how you like. It'll definitely be a unique one at this rate 😄
I like your thoughts on A.I. and whatnot. I'm not trying to knock your commentary. Might want to pause so you don't miss even more though.
you should definetly do your first playthrough without replaying, that is kind of the point of the game
but if you do decide on doing past scenarios i recommend not doing them from save points but doing multiple playthroughs because a lot of outcomes can completely change the story of later chapters in some cases
Is the Lieutenant played by Clancy Brown? they went all out in this game with the actors
Definitely think the game would be better off not giving players access to the flow chart and chapter select til after they finish their first playthrough. Getting tunnel visioned on the options is too common rather than just playing it through naturally and definitely throws off the immersion and ‘your choices matter’ purpose of the game.
1:37:45 Comme tu demandes notre opinion. Personnellement, je préfère que tu gardes le premier résultat, peu importe ce qui arrive. =)
Have mixed feelings about the flowchart. I mean. It is in the game so I guess it is meant to be used. It just feels save scummy to me. I like the surprise of playing a game a second time and discovering stuff I never knew about. But using the flow chart and replaying sections is definitely faster than going through the entire game again. Some people would not spend the time maybe if they had to start from scratch? As far as what you do, doesn't matter to me. If I watch a Let's Play, chances are I never play the game since it's been spoiled for me. (which is why I have not watched some of your series yet). Of course I am interested in seeing all the possibilities. Just feels weird I guess because it's... not traditional. I say go for it
I'd prefer you sticking with your first outcomes and then get another playthrough with different approach just to check how different episodes (and a whole story) could be.
31:37 ...
Don’t replay, the consequences are the point of the game. You need to realize that 100% is not getting the best outcomes in a scene. This game is meant to be replayed. Get your organic story based off your choices. Choice is the theme of the game.
I'd rather you play 10 times the same scene and DO NOT LOOK at the chart, then to play tiptoeing and afraid of missing UNAVOIDABLE RESTRICTED OPTIONS. It's obvious by now that you need to play multiple times to 100% this game, so I recommend you to play by hearth and replay anything you think its the games fault, bug or poor explained.
And you can get to the same or outcome without doing everything. You could do the minimal and still run away, for example. Be more loose and focus on gameplay, we don't care about the charts.
And I can't wait for you to make the seamoth, Captain. It will really make traveling more efficient.
Seems like the game wants to humanize the AI characters. In that case it should be one choice and one choice only. Whatever happens she must assume responsibility. Humans do not have that choice. Once is done is done. No backtracking available. 😊
Aww... I wanted to be the first commenter but there are lots of comments from 6 days ago already.
Edit: I'm gonna edit the crap out of this comment once I finish watching the episode. :)
Patrons get first say! 😁
@@LukaelPlays Oh, I didn't realize they were your Patreons. Makes total sense now. Don't worry, it's a non issue. lol
Thanks for posting, you were fun to watch as usual. ^^
I don't agree with you about the painting. Creating a perfect copy of something can never be creative. Yes, it requires skill and knowledge to be able to create a perfect copy of something. Thats why real artists do it. To hone and improve their skills and techniques. But copying is something inherently non creative. For a machine it is easy to create a copy of something, if it is within the capability of the machine to do so. Think of a printer. It can copy anything you want it to as perfect as its technical limitations allow it to. Even if you let the printer decide from some options what it wants to print you wouldn't call the printer creative. It just chose something to copy as good as it is able to.
I can see your point and I agree to some extent, but as an artist who's attempted realism many times myself, I still firmly think that there's a lot of creativity involved in it. Because Markus is a human robot with his own perspective and thoughts, and unlike a photocopier he doesn't have the motor functions to perfectly recreate an image, it has to be done by hand with thousands of singular brush strokes, and each of them represents a choice. Where to paint, how to move the brush, what colors to choose, how to blend them, these are all creative decisions, even if the final result is just a photorealistic painting. A lot of it is skill and technique of course, but you can't take the creativity out of it
@@LukaelPlays I guess that is true. If the android takes a real physical object and recreates it on canvas it does have to make desicions about the way it does paint it. I didn't think about it that way. You're right it is different than when it takes another painting or picture as it's template. Then it would be able to just copy everything stroke by stroke or pixel by pixel. On the other hand the android could have just taken a photo of the real thing and do just that. I think the first painting was done without creativity and the second one with creativity, because of the different ways the android painted them in the first one the movements were in straight lines from left to right and top to bottom, just like a printer or photocopier would produce a painting (although you could also argue that that was a creative choice to do it this way). The second time the movements were a lot more "natural" if you can call it that. I find this topic super interesting. Do you think real life AI like midjuorney and the like are "creative"? I'm very indecisive on that front, because on one hand it just mixes and matches thousands of already existing pictures together to create something kind of new but not really (in my opinion), but on the other hand you could say a human artist does the same thing in a way...
There's actually a bit in the movie Chappie where the titular robot paints a picture on canvas, but it does so in horizontal strokes kinda like an inkjet printer would, I thought that was done very well to show the more robotic way of thinking it has in producing art.
To answer your question, no I absolutely do not think that generative AI softwares are creative. To be creative, you need a consciousness, an intent, a perspective, a message to share. What these programs do is compile millions of (stolen) artwork, synthesize and disseminate the data, then complex algorithms calculate the most probable pixels to be arranged in a way that creates a picture based on a prompt. I've seen the argument that human artists are similar in a way, but it's simply not true. My brain can't synthesize every image I've ever seen and then rearrange them together into a new image. We are influenced by other artists of course, but also from our own personal tastes, preferences, experiences, imagination. GenAI cannot imagine anything new that hasn't been fed into it, because they're not conscious or creative, they're just visual data dissemination tools.
@@LukaelPlaysthat's a great point I've never thought of. Thanks for your perspective here about creativity!
56:32 - I would assume this is an ad since this is "Gossips Weekly" and not a research paper :D It's a highly unreliable source, in a made up universe.
You might be right that they don't play mind games with messaging, it's all very direct. So the devs probably sincerely thought this is the future, or just put it there as a throwaway "food for thought." In that case, I think it's more interesting to analyze the fact that they wrote "sorry, ladies" thinking that in 2038 only men would be interested in this stuff.
Also, it doesn't make any sense if you think about it for too long: if 68% of men "prefer an android to a real woman", does that mean they all practice polygamy? But no, we see traditional families everywhere, so do half the people just not meet and make babies anymore? Is this a black hole for demographics? No, that can't be it, we see homeless people and protestors shouting about unprecedented levels of unemployment so there's no shortage of workers driving up the wages.
I think they just put whatever sounds the most shocking or "expected." It's disappointment baiting, whatever gets a reaction of disappointment in humanity. This says more about the devs than the future, no? 😄
They were so close to having it be 69% too, should have gone for it!
But yeah, I think the fact it's coming from a "men's magazine" explains a lot about the high number lol it's like a "take that, women" kinda thing. Now I'm sure you'd find a lot of people who would actually feel that way for real, but how high would that number be? who knows
Every person plays the game as they want. But I, personally, would prefer you to play without looking at the flowchart and just pretend as if you're really the character of the game and everything happens as it happens. You can't replay the chapter of your life in the real world no matter how bad you want a different outcome. That's also the way I like people playing this game. I would prefer you to see other outcomes after you play the game the first time. You can do it on your own or in another video later. However it's your choice. I'll watch your letsplay anyway.
Oooh, I have never before seen Hank try to leave Carlos Ortiz' crime scene. I guess Connor spent too much time reading about android sex :D
😆
I'm going to say this, the game itself says that it was intended to be played without replaying the scenes and just sticking to your choices. The flowchart and the checkpoints are there more for replayability than for your first playthrough.
I myself am of the opinion that unless you majorly screw up and get your favourite character killed, you shouldn't restart and just stick it out. That being said, I don't want you to do that at the expense of your own enjoyment, so if replaying some scenes makes you enjoy the game more, so be it.
Aw, don't be paranoid to miss things :) It will inevitably happen anyway but it will just make you stressed out and less focused on the story if you overthink it. Also, as you found out in the first episode, some scenes are on a timer, so...
Yeah I went a bit overboard in this episode with the flowchart, but I'm gonna readjust in the future and focus less on it and more on just experiencing the story naturally 😅 we can always replay stuff later
Although, I have to admit it's kind of hilarious how the game tells you to do something and you go, "I'm going to do everything BUT that." :D :D
Mon opinion serais de jouer en gutt--feeling. Quitte à perdre un personnage. C'est même essentiel car tes choix porteraient un vrai risque, un enjeu. C'est ce qui se rapprocherai le plus du sujet philosophique du jeu.
Si tu joue au poker et que tu perd une main, on ne relance la partie, sinon il n'y a plus d'enjeu.
Libre à toi de voir : Faire un perfect run qui n'aurait rien d'organique ou subir la vie comme un vrai humain...
You have such a great insight into the story, it's really fun to watch you play. You are one of the few people I watched who immediately understood why Connor didn't get a choice in revealing the deviant in the attic rather than complain about it.
I do think you were right about relying on the flowchart though, I think it might be a bit more organic for you to just experience the scene :)
There are some things that you cannot fill in the flow chart by the nature of the game. If you do (or don't) do something in one of the previous scenes, you might then not have certain options in the next.