@@taitsmith8521 Well sorry to burst a bubble here but everyone is a "scientist" in regads. As their is no such degree as a scientist degree. There are only people with PHD'S and the majority of them are quite content on only following exactly what they read in their text books. Not to fully understand that they are only Standing on the shoulders of giants. They become Stuck in the stream
I think Joe is a master at adding meaningful points to a subject he doesn’t know much about. He doesnt pretend to know more than he does, but he still makes great points from an “outsiders” perspective.
I believe it stems from his ability to relate to people if/when you watch closely you can rarely see Joe gaze away from another person in other words his mind is most likely on task and he’s putting his self in their shoes like all of us fail to do on a daily basis during fellow interaction
No, he was a comedian so he mastered reading people and parasitically existing to their conversation. Its what comedians do, they observe from the outside while critisizing everyone from a position within their comfort subject or location.
I watched this guy on Lex's podcast. Let's see how Joe tackles him. Also, one bad thing about Spotify is that we're missing on the comments, even if Joe doesn't read them, his community interacts through them.
I honestly don't think he would have got so big/famous if it weren't for the comment section. Here we feel like a community, sharing ideas and jokes and comments on the new ideas that are being presented to us. With spotify it just seems so hollow and empty.
Joe Rogan podcast isnt a debate orientated animal. It is a genial non tackling platform for people in their subject field to come on and talk about it. And Joe nudging them along. I've seen opposing opinions once with Randall Carson, who is great, the English guy versus the skeptic.. This is a pretend serious show.. The deal here is , this guy has come to sell a book.
yeah absolutely- tbh spotify for podcasts is pretty great, same as youtube, no ads, can listen in the background while using other apps or with ur phone closed, has a falling asleep mode that sets a timer to stop playing. it’s the lack of comments that is rly letting it down but is a nightmare to manage for a company that wants a sleek and professional front.
The Channel Cool Worlds on TH-cam is also like that. The professor on that channel made a video specifically "debunking" Avi Loeb claims. Also, in his other videos he keeps theorising that we are alone and there are no Aliens.
@@Dankman9 Yeah I bet this guy has spent his life deep diving in astronomy so that in his 50s he could write a book that at best 5% of people will be interested in. And a tiny fraction will actually buy.
I have a feeling people nowadays misinterpret that “what if” questions and “what if” mentality as being concrete and fully lived in theories. It’s, quite frankly, FUCKING ANNOYING. No, Ben. I am not arguing, I’m simply saying WHAT IF and looking into it.
What integrity? I was working on a project at a bay area tech company. We paid a team of psychologists at Sta**ord University so they can make up a theory that suggests our product is effective, which they did of course. Quid pro quo, it's that simple.
You’ve never met an evolutionist. 😂. I generally think evolution serves a large explanatory and logical purpose... but damn don’t even start to question it or you are gonna get tarred and feathered. People who are devout evolutionist would question whether 2 + 2 = 4 before they would question it... it’s hysterical.
Correction, the "good scientist" once he has established his hypothesis, then focuses his attention on proving he is wrong. If he can't then he publishes to let everyone else have a go at it.
By the nature of inter-dimensional beings alone... people would be able to talk to them, as space and time wouldn’t really be a hindering factor for communication at that point. 👽👍
@@WhiteLivesMatterPL I'm pretty sure I can guess, since he seems to thrive on rejecting group think. As for the OP, this isn't even low key. It's brutal, and the accuracy enhances the brutality.
He is right, we could be progressing much faster if academia was willing to take risks and make mistakes. We should be encouraging this within academia
In grade school they told us the man who invented the paddle boat that ran on steam was thought of as a dreamer. Noah wasn't helped by any one in his plight either. There's a pattern going on isn't there?
"It's all about ego" is so on point in more than one way, the human species has always had a huge ego, we always tend to think we are the best, smartest, only ones to reach this point. But again and again we learn how wrong we are, for science to really expand, we need to accept that we have very little idea what is going on on our own planet, let alone the cosmos
Problem is sorting out down to earth scientists from delusional egos claiming to know what only they understood deserve your funding, because thats something you should just get even though you have nothing to back up your claims in the eyes of your "peers". Also there are scam artists.
As flawed as the human ego is, I'd much rather live with it than without. When I experienced my first ego death, I was lost for months unable to find my place in the world anymore. It was only after coming to terms with what happened and accepting my ego back did I get better and feel normal again. I was worried I'd be stuck like that forever
I currently work as a biologist in academia. Once I move I will probably leave the academic setting and try to get into the private sector. Anytime I question anything I get labeled as a “science denier” or a “conspiracy theorist”. The problem is that science is supposed to challenge dogma, but it doesn’t anymore. It only confirms what the researchers bias is because they cherry-pick the data that they want to put forward. When scientific publications endorse any political opinion or candidate (Scientific American) they immediately lose credibility.
I've been saying this for years. The academic community is so politically bias that even if a study found with 100% certainty that something generally accepted was false, you'd be shamed and censored into the ground before they'd recognize it!
thats not how science works. the scientific method prevents biases. people can be biased all they want but they arent going to get their theories published on journals without it going through the scientific method
i like this dude, my type of people that i hang out and talk to, humble, takes risks, not afraid to be wrong, doesnt care about honors and recognition, all about open mind and discoveries and no ego 💛
As a PhD scientist who has been in academic medicine for over a decade, this is an entirely accurate assessment of academic medicine and science in general. There is a bullying group-think that discourages innovation. One need look no further than the COVID dogma, in which alternative treatments to the profitable vaccines and expensive medications that are being pushed (doesn't the government, media, and conventional medical leadership promotion feel "salesy?) are aggressively dismissed, often with character slander. While scientific tools are powerful, the scientific system is as broken as legacy media.
Closed-minded scientists become part of the problem instead of seeking the solution when they allow politics, pride & prejudice hinder scientific progress. The culture in the scientific community needs to change, otherwise they'll be no different from the Catholic tribunal that handled Galileo's case.
I often wonder if this isn't just human nature. I squawk about a few things that seem to really piss people off and for reasons I'm not even sure. Like Solar mechanics for example. I recently postulated that the sun is in fact a positive anode in a sea of negatively charged particles as seen through Birkland currents/ electric radio telescopes. This of course is speculative and I even gave a disclaimer as such. Man, you should've heard the people freaking out on me. Why? Are we so entrenched in our scientific dogma that we cant even entertain another model? I even went on to try to explain how the surface is far cooler than the corona and the deepest depths of the sun spots even cooler yet suggesting, to me at least, that there is an external component to its fuel source. Wham!! Yelled at further and accused of disregarding actual science. This of course is not the case. Mainstream academia's tendency to demonize anything that doesn't fit their specific model is a travesty and a hindrance to our collective progress. I'm done with the soap box, you can take it back now. Thank you.
@@anthonygiambattista6922 That's it. Mainstream science is the new world's religion. Keepers and perpetuators of the brainwashing pseudo scientific dogmas
When people build a career on a theory it becomes very hard for them to accept any new data that would undermine the theory on which they have built their reputation. Scientists should not fear being proven wrong, that is why you do peer review, to try to find where you were wrong, but human ego gets in the way.
The idea theories can be 'undermined' is crazy and shows you don't understand how they work and you are mixing the scientific definition of theory and the philosophical definition, because in science they just take something observable and explain it, so we build on theories rather than dismiss them because they are objectively always useful. There's many examples of how scientists change and build on theories and it happens all the time, which shows your idea of scientists not wanting to be proven wrong and having egos is wrong. One of the most famous examples being Newtons laws of motion in the Principia, which Einstein saw errors in and fixed, and even Einsteins theory of general relativity isn't fully accurate at extremes, like all scientists would agree. But we still use both because they are useful and still work to make predictions. I can give you more examples of when scientific theories are changed because of new data if you would like, as there is many that exist. But when you say "new data" that's the key part and in this guys case he's just crazy and there is no data, "oh look the first interstellar object moving exactly how meteors move through the universe, must be proof of aliens, now buy my book"
"The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence" -Nikola Tesla
There is but it's not revealed publicly... Look up Nazi scientists and the occult... Ancient civilizations also had knowledge about non-physical existence
@Darren McGowand There's many legitimate sites reporting on it but when it comes to having proof none of us have access to real evidence to prove or disprove any of this
There is an important intersection between "the ego" (the need for social validation/ acceptance), and the intentional confinement of scientific/ academic discussions because of specific economic interests. Intellectual curiosity is no longer prioritized in academic circles; the emphasis is merely the concretizing of consensus.
Seriously why is this? I stopped listening to him he sold out. How can a guy be ‘so open’ and do dmt in float tanks believe in aliens but not for second consider facts of this bullshit ‘cnn virus of fear’ one simple thing the death rate hasn’t changed.
Joe: “how old are you?” Loeb: “some people want to say there is no age, I am different, I would rather look age straight in the eye and say ‘what is my age’.” Joe: “yeah totally, so how old are you...”
Loeb: My colleagues would say, you are 56. I say it is not about your ego, it is about the world. So I say, alien long rock nigga 56 Joe : right, totally I agree.
I saw a write up last week about him in my local liberal rag. Keep in mind, it is also the media that is able to sell papers buy acting like this guy is crazy.
I know Joe gets called a meathead, but you gotta think, he has a ton of extremely intelligent people on his podcast essentially giving him 1 on 1 lectures that we have the privilege of listening in on. Even if he only absorbed 10% of it, he’s learning constantly.
@@SuperSenis well bozo wen ur mothor teach me a new word 2 spell n she reward my corect speling by showing me her gross juggz sometimes i rember how 2 spell the word propreley
@@richardkoen4325 He's a hypocrite and he is kind of stupid, or at least pseudo scientific. He's basically a self parody with how ridiculous and hypocritical he is. Also he's trying to be controversial to sell his book.
Wow, I can’t introduce evidence to refute his statement so I’ll just call a Dr who’s published over 800 scientific papers while chairing 4 or 5 different scientific institutes dumb!!!
Always trust a mad scientist who sounds German but also French while being an Israeli American, they are usually the best, especially when they also have their voice change pitches mid pronunciation
I like this guy. A lot. He thinks very similar to me. Or actually I think similar to him. His no ego and just wanting the truth and information is how any person should be in that job profession. I always thought it was and not this ego culture he's saying it's truly like. N I agree with him with the meaning of life. Just enjoy the process bro.
@@dingonaut1794 The vocabulary of your comment implies that you do not think anything like him. Not trying to be mean. You share his ethos, would be a better way of phrasing it. Also, it reeks of ego to state you have no ego. :P
I really enjoy this guys point of view on not caring about being right or wrong. He just has the passion to want to know what the heck it is, and how can we learn from it. Good luck to him!
Joe, interview with Dr. Mike Mew, he discovered MEWING, it is a habit that makes you more attractive (at the bone level) in about 3 years, it consists of pushing the tongue against the palate to expand it and thus your jaw is marked, Your upper jaw is advanced (avoiding a flat face) and your chin is advanced (because with your tongue you direct facial growth forward). His channel is called ORTHOTROPICS, there is a video that explains more details about this called "attractive face or not"
I live in Korea, and can't even access spotify without using vpn, which I am not willing to do just to listen to JRE. There are ppl in the comments asking why one would not use spotify for these podcasts instead of youtube, and here is why
"intellectual debt" - over investment in biased direction of ideas that doesn't allow easily pivoting towards another set of ideas ..that might better describe the phenomena
When you depend on publications to get funding, that makes it hard to do research with an open mind. The funding in academia is scarce, so only scientists with "money to burn" can explore more open minded research.
Which is why there are no doubt secret laboratories doing everything from killer robot AI to radical gene splicing, chimera breeding, brain transplants, etc. Just think of the experiments the aliens in MarsAttacks! we're doing with terrestrial biology, that kinna shit. All funded by bored, ultra-wealthy psychopath fucksticks.
If your just going follow and push a narrative for the sole benefit of filling up your own pockets, especially in a career that is put on top of one of the highest pedestals of information and knowledge, then your simply a pathetic individual and clearly not very smart after all and in my opinion not worthy of your job title. People need to stop striving for careers based souly on the amount of money they can make not giving to shits if it takes getting stopped completly of your dignity or values. Careers need to be chosen by people based on passion because with passion comes great value of the work you do and no amount of money is worth the compromise of your passion, of your truth. Its proven time and time again that people who are so easily bought out like a puppet do nothing beneficial for society at all, the only thing they bring to society is toxicity and disgrace and I don't know about you but I'm so sick and tired of these cooperate sellouts who could care less if what they do is fake or not as long as they get their overly paid paycheck for being an awful, superficial and materialistic human being. I see right through the fake narrative and it's getting quite old. I want people who are passionate about the work they do and because of that passion are admit on serving nothing but truth.
@@Stereotypically_Maadz I agree with you but it does come to money and pockets...they control if you make a ton or no money. Follow rules and you will be fine...you don't, well, you have no job and no one will hire you if you disobey. Sadly this is how it works. This goes for ALL professions...ALL!
Then you can make lucrative speeches, and shelter those fees inside an S-corp, avoiding paying Medicare taxes while hyping up "Medicare for All," and then be installed as a faux president.
@@Stereotypically_Maadz you've just offended 75% of scientists in your first sentence (completely true by the way). This is why what Avi says is so shocking to people. Not because it's not true. Not because we don't already know it. But because you're not *supposed* to say such things. Censorship only ultimately leads to worse things. If we can't talk about the cobwebs in our societal closets and get them cleaned out, things will get worse. I've known cancer researchers and their petty games that they play to get credit for things supercedes the interest in actually finding a cure. The stories I heard leave me with no doubts why cancer hasn't been cured yet. It's a sh*t show and scientists are some of the most egotistical people out there, just taking paychecks and looking for credit over results.
“If we find ourselves with a desire that nothing in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that we were made for another world.”-CS Lewis
Anyone reading this who might feel socially awkward/nerdy as a young person studying science: may I recommend getting a part time job at a bar/restaurant. Helped with my people skills a lot. Also, there's still something off with these camera angles.
Can confirm. I used to be painfully shy and self-conscious in high school. Then in my 20s, I worked mainly as a server. Now I just accept that not everyone is going to like you. No sense in letting it get you down or break your stride. Now when I tell people I used to be really, really shy...they think I'm bullshitting. But also I think people tend to get more confident as they grow and mature with life experience.
Wish this was not on spotiy, i whould loved to listen to hele hole thing.. He is so bloody smart!! and he gave me a lot of things to think about.. Thank you Levi Loeb
The way he uses analogies reminds me of me lol. As a physics student I try to make everything relatable with real life events. But when I began learning Quantum Mechanics thats when everything got shit on. Its gets more abstract as you take higher level courses and kind of detaches from "common" daily life.
I took an astronomy class in undergrad. In the last paragraph on the chapter on the Copernican revolution the textbook's author stated explicitly that there is similar revoutionary information science has uncovered but that that information is being actively supressed for socio-political reasons.
This man is already on a better path than his colleagues and even most people today. Listen to him and meditate on what he is saying. I feel it applies to all careers/ paths a person takes.
@@shaneviola8848 I can only think of the metaphor we use of 'Smart cookie' getting mixed up with the idiom 'Not the sharpest tool in the box', because yes, why on earth would cookies be sharp? 😂 Maybe that's what happened.
I laughed when he said that. Especially since he was crying that nobody is open minded, while telling joe aliens could NEVER be interested us. Wouldn’t even budge on the possibility they may be curious
I like this guy and he is right. Everything is a conspiracy theory until evidence is found to legitimize it. Lack of evidence does not mean its not true. It is difficult to discern what is bs from what are legitimate hypotheses. Just have an open but skeptical mind.
It blows my mind that some scientists don't want to find new things that might question the things in our universe that we THINK are the way things work in our universe. I would think finding something new would be a spectacular lifetime discovery to be exceptionally proud of.
That's how the education system programs them. Like Albert Hoffman said higher education and the mainstream scientific establishment is designed to make you a reductionist/materialist
I work in customer service. I’ve seen my personality filled coworkers promote to managers and become people who you’d think got their tongues cut out. Depending on the environment you really have to go against the “mental programming” to sustain freewill like “openness”
This guy is great! Really back to the true elements of what science really is. Not caring about his social status or fame. Question everything, be curious! We need more people open minded.
So true! When you get to a point of growing up you loose imagination and want to just focus on status and making moneu instead of making mistakes and realizing what life can show you
Avi is better on Fridman, b/c he gives him more room to expand on what he's saying & doesn't get argumentative (every one of Rogan's arguments against Loeb are bad)
I was going to comment that I haven’t listened to a single JRE podcast since it went to Spotify... Then I realized that everyone else already did 😂 It literally feels like Joe Rogan died
Whenever someone suggests a change in thinking or practice for the betterment or advancement of society there's a point while they're making their case where I realize that the process of making said change is unfurling right in front of me. "We need to stop rejecting ideas to more quickly and effectively progress scientific advancements," and the process of doing this is by making the case. It feels as though doing so is as easy done as it is said, and my realization challenges that perspective and always blows my mind. There is a universe in the future where humanity does not allow social or ego based objections to combat progression and it will be moments like this video podcast that will have been the catalyst for doing so. If it is meant to be, it will be and time is the heaviest factor.
This man is speaking the absolute truth, academia is more like dark age religion in its ideation, systemic structure, and criticism of new ideas than its ever been due to ego and greed. The very people meant to be the brightest explorers of our universal understanding are turning more and more tribal/insular. So much of it stems from society's systems as a whole that the only real change will be from those of us newly entering the academic frontier. If you are entering academia right now please do not continue down the path we are taking and be willing to open your mind to new ideas. In this way we will go further faster than ever before. If you read this then keep on keeping on :)
What's funny is that actually led to a big fallout in the Christian community. Too many politics and corruption eroded the scientific principles many scientists and thinkers valued. It made the faith weaker as whole. In principle, being averse to risks only destroys the fabric that made the faith great in the first place.
@@vovamays1 You are welcome to quote my comment or use a picture of it however I am not comfortable with an interview, good luck with your project. Regardless of whether or not you use the comment I would love to see the end result
This is how a real scientist should think. Respect. I have witnessed the same closed mindedness in the academia during my studies at the university as well.
One of the reasons I prefer Michio over Neil. I feel Neil will poopoo or laugh at questions as nonsense. Michio will tell you no and give a reason for why not then give an example of how it Might be possible. I know its just different styles of communicating science to the masses but I find I prefer also hearing how something might be possible.
@@robert48044 Neil is a pretty good example. The guy has a hugely inflated ego. He revels in being an “authority” on a subject. That’s a big problem w scientists
My mom is a nurse of 20 + years, she manages ICU and cath lab. She just recently took the vaccine and she’s very sick as a result atm. Coughing a lot and feeling very bad. Not hospitalized but says she’s feeling very sick. The rest of us are good so right now.
@@CE-vd2px Playback meaning the listening experience of the podcast. On Apple you just hit play and off you go. Close the app and when you come back your right there ready to go where you left off. Never paused for who knows what fkn reason.. Offline listening with auto downloads. Overall the listening experience was WAY better on Apple.. but I’m muttling thru.
For someone who was born in 97’ once I found out that until 1995 people didn’t think there were exoplanets I thought that was insane. Growing up I thought it was just common sense.
Who else hasn't watched a single episode since going to spotify?
Yeah me lol and Joe doesn't even give a fuck because he still has 150 million people listening to his podcasts
Shut up or they will stop posting clips.
I haven't watched one and I have Spotify lol
Only watched Mark Normand & Tony. The rest is doo doo
Only because I don’t use Spotify.
Joe “my posture gets better the smarter my guest is” Rogan
🤣🤣🤣 omfg
😂😂
NO LITERALLY!!!!! LOL
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
OMG It was the first thing I noticed about this video and had to go back to see it again so I could continue to laugh 😂!!!!
"The scientific inquiry is not about us- it is about nature."
Beautiful.
👏🏿
Its also about our survival, survival of our species .
The attitude of .01% of scientists.
True things are beautiful.
@@taitsmith8521 Well sorry to burst a bubble here but everyone is a "scientist" in regads. As their is no such degree as a scientist degree.
There are only people with PHD'S and the majority of them are quite content on only following exactly what they read in their text books.
Not to fully understand that they are only Standing on the shoulders of giants. They become Stuck in the stream
I think Joe is a master at adding meaningful points to a subject he doesn’t know much about. He doesnt pretend to know more than he does, but he still makes great points from an “outsiders” perspective.
That is absolutely the best way to describe this podcast
Alot of people do that, including me. It helps us to better understand the conversation
@@sandcastle1417 same on literally every alex jones podcast
I believe it stems from his ability to relate to people if/when you watch closely you can rarely see Joe gaze away from another person in other words his mind is most likely on task and he’s putting his self in their shoes like all of us fail to do on a daily basis during fellow interaction
No, he was a comedian so he mastered reading people and parasitically existing to their conversation. Its what comedians do, they observe from the outside while critisizing everyone from a position within their comfort subject or location.
I watched this guy on Lex's podcast. Let's see how Joe tackles him. Also, one bad thing about Spotify is that we're missing on the comments, even if Joe doesn't read them, his community interacts through them.
I honestly don't think he would have got so big/famous if it weren't for the comment section. Here we feel like a community, sharing ideas and jokes and comments on the new ideas that are being presented to us. With spotify it just seems so hollow and empty.
Joe Rogan podcast isnt a debate orientated animal. It is a genial non tackling platform for people in their subject field to come on and talk about it. And Joe nudging them along. I've seen opposing opinions once with Randall Carson, who is great, the English guy versus the skeptic.. This is a pretend serious show.. The deal here is , this guy has come to sell a book.
yeah absolutely- tbh spotify for podcasts is pretty great, same as youtube, no ads, can listen in the background while using other apps or with ur phone closed, has a falling asleep mode that sets a timer to stop playing. it’s the lack of comments that is rly letting it down but is a nightmare to manage for a company that wants a sleek and professional front.
The comments SUCK. They add literally nothing to the video.
yeah we like to comment about joe phrases
Give this Bond villain whatever he wants
😂👍🏻
I think he wants a huge laser into the moon, so definitely.
He just wants his cat back.
Lol!!!
Lmao
He's describing Neil Tyson.
Bingo!
Niel "know-it-all" Tyson.
This has been my take on him for a long time.
The Channel Cool Worlds on TH-cam is also like that. The professor on that channel made a video specifically "debunking" Avi Loeb claims. Also, in his other videos he keeps theorising that we are alone and there are no Aliens.
Hahaha Exactly! 😂 the ultimate scientific community mafia guy! 🤮
This dude is old school punk rock he doesn’t care about the clout hes just down for the knowledge
He doesn't give a damn about "knowledge" he just wants to sell his book.
@@Dankman9 Yeah I bet this guy has spent his life deep diving in astronomy so that in his 50s he could write a book that at best 5% of people will be interested in. And a tiny fraction will actually buy.
@@richardkoen4325 Word. ;P
Dude is silly, I wouldn't be so outspoken about it if he wasn't fooling so many people with his nonsense.
I have a feeling people nowadays misinterpret that “what if” questions and “what if” mentality as being concrete and fully lived in theories. It’s, quite frankly, FUCKING ANNOYING. No, Ben. I am not arguing, I’m simply saying WHAT IF and looking into it.
@DownsviewD Did you listen to the podcast? He literally shits on his profession and his colleagues
Surprised youtube didn’t flag this with a Wikipedia disclaimer about the integrity of the scientific community.
Look up the replication crisis
What integrity? I was working on a project at a bay area tech company. We paid a team of psychologists at Sta**ord University so they can make up
a theory that suggests our product is effective, which they did of course. Quid pro quo, it's that simple.
Hahahahaha 😂😂😂
@@UnlicensedPharmaciszt Psychology and Physics are not the same.
@@UnlicensedPharmaciszt he said "psychologists" ... uh huh huh huh (Beavis/Butthead laugh). Might as well have engaged cabana towel boys.
A good scientist, or engineer, or doctor is always interested in the possibility that they are wrong.
Well how else can you be sure you are right.
You’ve never met an evolutionist. 😂. I generally think evolution serves a large explanatory and logical purpose... but damn don’t even start to question it or you are gonna get tarred and feathered. People who are devout evolutionist would question whether 2 + 2 = 4 before they would question it... it’s hysterical.
@@SH-kz4fl The evidence for evolution is overwhelming. We may not have all the pieces to fully explain it yet, but we know its a thing.
Correction, the "good scientist" once he has established his hypothesis, then focuses his
attention on proving he is wrong. If he can't then he publishes to let everyone else have a go at it.
It’s a mark of how the educational system has failed when this OP even needs to be said. Research design should be taught in 7th grade.
Spotify has to add a comment section. I miss y’all🥺
Who the heck r'ya
See ya later, Chuck!
I never moved to spotify
So the comments is still here to me
"There are crazy people out there that think they can talk to inter-dimentional beings"
~ Joe "DMT" Rogan
he was quoting a hypothetical of what the general public paradigm would say.
Apparently you're the only one who picked up on that. I guess we can say that Joe was just playing devil's advocate here lol
@@stevencoardvenice 2:20 He is definitely NOT playing devils advocate. He clearly calls it NONSENSE.
@@watchbabe5479 2:20
By the nature of inter-dimensional beings alone... people would be able to talk to them, as space and time wouldn’t really be a hindering factor for communication at that point. 👽👍
he's lowkey dissing people working on string theory. This man is a straight G.
@@619Gotenks listen to like the first 2 minutes lmfao
I picked that up right away lol!
I'd like to hear this guys stance on anthropogenic climate change hoax
@@WhiteLivesMatterPL I'm pretty sure I can guess, since he seems to thrive on rejecting group think. As for the OP, this isn't even low key. It's brutal, and the accuracy enhances the brutality.
@@WhiteLivesMatterPL Bruh we are literally experiencing climate change rn and you're denying it?
This guy is so intelligent Joe can tell he has a fully formed frontal loeb.
HAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAFUKKOFFHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
the guy is obviously not that intelligent
@@thingy2780 you are the closed minded people hes talking about
🤣 good one
@meow purr you must be looking into a rabbit hole of alternative facts to fit your own “agenda” or way of thinking.
He is right, we could be progressing much faster if academia was willing to take risks and make mistakes. We should be encouraging this within academia
ETHICAL risks, remember what it implies without ethics. Anything is fair game for those with a Machiavellian ideology.
@@josuemc93 you need to actually read Machiavelli if you think he was some self-serving psychopath
In grade school they told us the man who invented the paddle boat that ran on steam was thought of as a dreamer. Noah wasn't helped by any one in his plight either. There's a pattern going on isn't there?
@@heathenpride7931 No, people will use it as an excuse. They see the results as justifying whatever means possible.
@@josuemc93 so you’re not going to read Machiavelli because... hurr durr ends shouldn’t justify the means?
"Like eating good food, we should just enjoy the process, I will not name another example."
The most discreate sex joke in human history.
even joe didnt catch that
Right!!! Amazing
Hahaha
I scrolled down to the comments to see if anyone caught it. That was like the classiest dirty joke I've ever heard.
"It's all about ego" is so on point in more than one way, the human species has always had a huge ego, we always tend to think we are the best, smartest, only ones to reach this point. But again and again we learn how wrong we are, for science to really expand, we need to accept that we have very little idea what is going on on our own planet, let alone the cosmos
Not only that, we think we exist.
Problem is sorting out down to earth scientists from delusional egos claiming to know what only they understood deserve your funding, because thats something you should just get even though you have nothing to back up your claims in the eyes of your "peers".
Also there are scam artists.
@z borg That's why you go and search for your own experience
@z borg Everything does
As flawed as the human ego is, I'd much rather live with it than without. When I experienced my first ego death, I was lost for months unable to find my place in the world anymore. It was only after coming to terms with what happened and accepting my ego back did I get better and feel normal again. I was worried I'd be stuck like that forever
I currently work as a biologist in academia. Once I move I will probably leave the academic setting and try to get into the private sector. Anytime I question anything I get labeled as a “science denier” or a “conspiracy theorist”. The problem is that science is supposed to challenge dogma, but it doesn’t anymore. It only confirms what the researchers bias is because they cherry-pick the data that they want to put forward. When scientific publications endorse any political opinion or candidate (Scientific American) they immediately lose credibility.
I've been saying this for years. The academic community is so politically bias that even if a study found with 100% certainty that something generally accepted was false, you'd be shamed and censored into the ground before they'd recognize it!
thats not how science works. the scientific method prevents biases. people can be biased all they want but they arent going to get their theories published on journals without it going through the scientific method
i like this dude, my type of people that i hang out and talk to, humble, takes risks, not afraid to be wrong, doesnt care about honors and recognition, all about open mind and discoveries and no ego 💛
As a PhD scientist who has been in academic medicine for over a decade, this is an entirely accurate assessment of academic medicine and science in general. There is a bullying group-think that discourages innovation. One need look no further than the COVID dogma, in which alternative treatments to the profitable vaccines and expensive medications that are being pushed (doesn't the government, media, and conventional medical leadership promotion feel "salesy?) are aggressively dismissed, often with character slander. While scientific tools are powerful, the scientific system is as broken as legacy media.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
"horse de-wormer"
Closed-minded scientists become part of the problem instead of seeking the solution when they allow politics, pride & prejudice hinder scientific progress. The culture in the scientific community needs to change, otherwise they'll be no different from the Catholic tribunal that handled Galileo's case.
I often wonder if this isn't just human nature. I squawk about a few things that seem to really piss people off and for reasons I'm not even sure. Like Solar mechanics for example. I recently postulated that the sun is in fact a positive anode in a sea of negatively charged particles as seen through Birkland currents/ electric radio telescopes. This of course is speculative and I even gave a disclaimer as such. Man, you should've heard the people freaking out on me. Why? Are we so entrenched in our scientific dogma that we cant even entertain another model? I even went on to try to explain how the surface is far cooler than the corona and the deepest depths of the sun spots even cooler yet suggesting, to me at least, that there is an external component to its fuel source. Wham!! Yelled at further and accused of disregarding actual science. This of course is not the case. Mainstream academia's tendency to demonize anything that doesn't fit their specific model is a travesty and a hindrance to our collective progress. I'm done with the soap box, you can take it back now. Thank you.
@@anthonygiambattista6922 That's it. Mainstream science is the new world's religion. Keepers and perpetuators of the brainwashing pseudo scientific dogmas
The way this guy talks like massages your ears.
More like plucking ear hairs.
I have a guy in town that sells vapes and alcohol to underage guys. This guy sounds exactly like him.
I doubt anyone’s Jewish grandparents would agree.
Kinda sounds like 50 cent in the 2nd verse of window shopper.
Start a jre asmr clips????????
I bet they’re more open minded than Spotify workers.
@Jake listen bro Idk what kind of weirdo stuff ur saying but let’s keep shit normal under my comment okay thanks
To what are you referring
Wow, you are so edgy! Wow!
Haha boomf
Jesus christ you fucking killed them
Watched him on lex, love his excitement when he speaks of learning. Bet he's a great professor
And great scientist!
Same here!
When people build a career on a theory it becomes very hard for them to accept any new data that would undermine the theory on which they have built their reputation. Scientists should not fear being proven wrong, that is why you do peer review, to try to find where you were wrong, but human ego gets in the way.
and funding
The idea theories can be 'undermined' is crazy and shows you don't understand how they work and you are mixing the scientific definition of theory and the philosophical definition, because in science they just take something observable and explain it, so we build on theories rather than dismiss them because they are objectively always useful.
There's many examples of how scientists change and build on theories and it happens all the time, which shows your idea of scientists not wanting to be proven wrong and having egos is wrong. One of the most famous examples being Newtons laws of motion in the Principia, which Einstein saw errors in and fixed, and even Einsteins theory of general relativity isn't fully accurate at extremes, like all scientists would agree. But we still use both because they are useful and still work to make predictions. I can give you more examples of when scientific theories are changed because of new data if you would like, as there is many that exist.
But when you say "new data" that's the key part and in this guys case he's just crazy and there is no data, "oh look the first interstellar object moving exactly how meteors move through the universe, must be proof of aliens, now buy my book"
People are stupid asf anymore
Social media is ruining everything slowly but surely
Absolutely
Get more guests like this and I'll go to Spotify!!!
More of the scientists back!!! Especially the ones that don't care what their peers say!!!
Yeah I want to see Peter Duesberg back on there
check out Lex Fridman's podcast. He had this guest on before Joe and he's on TH-cam, AND has been on Joe's podcast lmao
Add a comment section and I'll go right with you
Yea he had too many show-biz people back to back. Its kinda boring.
@@gigahertz_1911 For some reason I don't like Lex. His presence is very robotic. Not my style of podcast.
Dr. Thomas Sowells book "Intellectuals and Society" speaks directly to this subject.
I read it and you're right!
Sowell is a turd who believes that the European empires never made a red cent off the colonies so what the hell does he know
@@stanleyzu7914 more than you
"The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence" -Nikola Tesla
@Romeo ThePLUG that's not a belief that's a fact
@@zacharyrose8011 what is yikes about it? Where is hard verifiable evidence that there are non-physical things that exist and influence our world?
There is but it's not revealed publicly... Look up Nazi scientists and the occult... Ancient civilizations also had knowledge about non-physical existence
@Darren McGowand There's many legitimate sites reporting on it but when it comes to having proof none of us have access to real evidence to prove or disprove any of this
@Darren McGowand Theorizing is the first step if the scientific approach... Like the theory of evolution which has not yet been proven
Joe’s guest speaker would have an amazing voiceover career at Cartoon Network...
@PELKEY1986 - 😂
Omllete de frumage
Why?
@@davecohen1459 - why? He literally sounds EXACTLY like the scientist from “Phineas & Ferb”
There is an important intersection between "the ego" (the need for social validation/ acceptance), and the intentional confinement of scientific/ academic discussions because of specific economic interests. Intellectual curiosity is no longer prioritized in academic circles; the emphasis is merely the concretizing of consensus.
Loved this guy in Hotel Transylvania.
😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Blaaa blaaa blaaa!!!
Nice😂
Brilliant🤣🤣
"people were saying crazy things about covid 19"
Joe- 👁️👄👁️
Seriously why is this?
I stopped listening to him he sold out. How can a guy be ‘so open’ and do dmt in float tanks believe in aliens but not for second consider facts of this bullshit ‘cnn virus of fear’ one simple
thing the death rate hasn’t changed.
He's right about Scientific community
Joe: “how old are you?”
Loeb: “some people want to say there is no age, I am different, I would rather look age straight in the eye and say ‘what is my age’.”
Joe: “yeah totally, so how old are you...”
Loeb: My colleagues would say, you are 56. I say it is not about your ego, it is about the world. So I say, alien long rock nigga 56
Joe : right, totally I agree.
This physicist dude is a real one, I respect his passion and revealing of the pushback in the scientific community
I saw a write up last week about him in my local liberal rag. Keep in mind, it is also the media that is able to sell papers buy acting like this guy is crazy.
I disagree. He's very close minded and definitely media based
I know Joe gets called a meathead, but you gotta think, he has a ton of extremely intelligent people on his podcast essentially giving him 1 on 1 lectures that we have the privilege of listening in on. Even if he only absorbed 10% of it, he’s learning constantly.
"he's learning constantly"
Well said, Einstein. Tell us more about this constant learning you're talking about. haha
@@SuperSenis well bozo wen ur mothor teach me a new word 2 spell n she reward my corect speling by showing me her gross juggz sometimes i rember how 2 spell the word propreley
This scientist comes off smart but you must remember he was repeatedly defeated by a platypus
Noooooooooo 🤣😂😂
I wish I understood your reference but to anyone with half a brain this guy does not come off as smart.
@@Dankman9 Damn bro what's with the hate. Jesus Christ you might not agree with him but this guy's not dumb.
@@richardkoen4325 He's a hypocrite and he is kind of stupid, or at least pseudo scientific. He's basically a self parody with how ridiculous and hypocritical he is. Also he's trying to be controversial to sell his book.
Wow, I can’t introduce evidence to refute his statement so I’ll just call a Dr who’s published over 800 scientific papers while chairing 4 or 5 different scientific institutes dumb!!!
Joe “Quantum Physics” Rogan
He ain’t that smart lol smart but not that smart
LOL 😆
"My take on all this 'Quantum Physicality' is.."
amanda g Joe doesnt have a BSc in physics forget a phd... he isn’t qualified to say the words “quantum physics” lol
@@SliceofBread123 I think you echoed her points PrimateSkull
Always trust a mad scientist who sounds German but also French while being an Israeli American, they are usually the best, especially when they also have their voice change pitches mid pronunciation
😂😂😂 reminds me of team fortress 2
😭
Best comment
I've learned more from watching joe rogan than I have anywhere else . each episode is a wealth of knowledge
I appreciate Avi's point of view about discovery and risk versus ego. It reminds me of the motivation of a pure artist.
The dislikes are from 22yr old college students who checked Snopes and it said that Science magazine reports that this guy isn't peer reviewed.
Totally agree with your comment !
"That's crazy....have you ever tried DMT?"
Never gonna get old
@@matthewfox1561 not "bad"
Classic
@@michalmynarski1585 fr
I hope that these JRE clips channel stays on TH-cam. I enjoy watching them of what I'm missing on Spotify.
Ghramm Hancock had the same problem when putting forth his theories on ancient civilizations.
I like this guy. In another universe I would be a scientist instead of a line cook.
Lol yep in one of the other billions of simulated universes I am not on the ground dying and we are working scientists.
@@amiracleone2803 you okay?
@@npc-tq6yi not really but o well nothing can be done. Thanks for your concern
@@amiracleone2803 DRAMA MAMA
@@bartfart3847 Heart disease is a bitch people can be worse
The single most polite way I’ve ever heard someone reference sex being awesome lol.
Do you watch these on Spotify?
Bruh i just got to that part😅
''We should enjoy the process, just like eating good food you know, I will not mention the other example''
I like this guy. A lot. He thinks very similar to me. Or actually I think similar to him. His no ego and just wanting the truth and information is how any person should be in that job profession. I always thought it was and not this ego culture he's saying it's truly like. N I agree with him with the meaning of life. Just enjoy the process bro.
@@dingonaut1794 The vocabulary of your comment implies that you do not think anything like him.
Not trying to be mean. You share his ethos, would be a better way of phrasing it.
Also, it reeks of ego to state you have no ego. :P
I really enjoy this guys point of view on not caring about being right or wrong. He just has the passion to want to know what the heck it is, and how can we learn from it. Good luck to him!
Never heard of this guy before but I love not just what he says but how he’s saying it. Clearly loves his work
7/11 was a part time job
It’s wage will be raised to 15 dollars before you know it
Joe, interview with Dr. Mike Mew, he discovered MEWING, it is a habit that makes you more attractive (at the bone level) in about 3 years, it consists of pushing the tongue against the palate to expand it and thus your jaw is marked, Your upper jaw is advanced (avoiding a flat face) and your chin is advanced (because with your tongue you direct facial growth forward). His channel is called ORTHOTROPICS, there is a video that explains more details about this called "attractive face or not"
Wait i get it cause 7/11 workers are the same people who did the 9/11 attacks
@@MrGFloyd Oof
Ha!
That’s too fucking funny
Someone get Eddie in here to show him what closed minded really is.
Bro😂
Notice the mass act of trying to hide eddie bravo. They wasn't ready for the truth.
Yeah this guys full of gravity waves
Closed minded = Hole
@@LoganPennell123 yeh where is he he's disappeared from all podcasts
What's lost with Joe moving to Spotify, is the ability to interact with his full interviews by commenting. It's a significant loss.
why would you put the episodes on spotify ? no words needed! this one needed to be HERE!!! on youtube with this amazing info
Because they paid him 100 million for it lol
I live in Korea, and can't even access spotify without using vpn, which I am not willing to do just to listen to JRE. There are ppl in the comments asking why one would not use spotify for these podcasts instead of youtube, and here is why
bruh even having a vpn won't do the job, or at least for me
@Rays Through Trees, Summer Breeze Best Korea
@Rays Through Trees, Summer Breeze 😂😂
"intellectual debt" - over investment in biased direction of ideas that doesn't allow easily pivoting towards another set of ideas ..that might better describe the phenomena
Ooooh I like that concept
I'd call it institutional inertia.
In other words “I was wrong”.
When you depend on publications to get funding, that makes it hard to do research with an open mind. The funding in academia is scarce, so only scientists with "money to burn" can explore more open minded research.
Facts
That was his point about tenuring professors, you give them almost certain employment so they can research whatever they want.
Which is why there are no doubt secret laboratories doing everything from killer robot AI to radical gene splicing, chimera breeding, brain transplants, etc. Just think of the experiments the aliens in MarsAttacks! we're doing with terrestrial biology, that kinna shit. All funded by bored, ultra-wealthy psychopath fucksticks.
@@Cracktaculus Dulce base?
More More MOOORRREEEE, Avi is a Legend, keep up the interviews with him!
Come back to TH-cam !
Get Spotify loser
@@FalconTalk Spotify sucks sped
This is definitely TH-cam
@@FalconTalk the Video doesn’t work on spotify on a Lot of devices you turd
@@FalconTalk think your mommy is calling. Time for din din
Why be open-minded when you can get paid to say whatever narrative an interest group wants you to say?
If your just going follow and push a narrative for the sole benefit of filling up your own pockets, especially in a career that is put on top of one of the highest pedestals of information and knowledge, then your simply a pathetic individual and clearly not very smart after all and in my opinion not worthy of your job title. People need to stop striving for careers based souly on the amount of money they can make not giving to shits if it takes getting stopped completly of your dignity or values. Careers need to be chosen by people based on passion because with passion comes great value of the work you do and no amount of money is worth the compromise of your passion, of your truth. Its proven time and time again that people who are so easily bought out like a puppet do nothing beneficial for society at all, the only thing they bring to society is toxicity and disgrace and I don't know about you but I'm so sick and tired of these cooperate sellouts who could care less if what they do is fake or not as long as they get their overly paid paycheck for being an awful, superficial and materialistic human being. I see right through the fake narrative and it's getting quite old. I want people who are passionate about the work they do and because of that passion are admit on serving nothing but truth.
@@Stereotypically_Maadz I agree with you but it does come to money and pockets...they control if you make a ton or no money. Follow rules and you will be fine...you don't, well, you have no job and no one will hire you if you disobey. Sadly this is how it works. This goes for ALL professions...ALL!
Then you can make lucrative speeches, and shelter those fees inside an S-corp, avoiding paying Medicare taxes while hyping up "Medicare for All," and then be installed as a faux president.
They cured covid in a year but you can keep battling your allergies with Xertec for 299.99/month
@@Stereotypically_Maadz you've just offended 75% of scientists in your first sentence (completely true by the way). This is why what Avi says is so shocking to people. Not because it's not true. Not because we don't already know it. But because you're not *supposed* to say such things. Censorship only ultimately leads to worse things. If we can't talk about the cobwebs in our societal closets and get them cleaned out, things will get worse. I've known cancer researchers and their petty games that they play to get credit for things supercedes the interest in actually finding a cure. The stories I heard leave me with no doubts why cancer hasn't been cured yet. It's a sh*t show and scientists are some of the most egotistical people out there, just taking paychecks and looking for credit over results.
‘What’s the meaning of life?’ .....to enjoy the process. Great answer.
“If we find ourselves with a desire that nothing in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that we were made for another world.”-CS Lewis
I feel smarter listening to Avi. Thank you for having him on your show.
Anyone reading this who might feel socially awkward/nerdy as a young person studying science: may I recommend getting a part time job at a bar/restaurant. Helped with my people skills a lot.
Also, there's still something off with these camera angles.
Can confirm. I used to be painfully shy and self-conscious in high school. Then in my 20s, I worked mainly as a server. Now I just accept that not everyone is going to like you. No sense in letting it get you down or break your stride. Now when I tell people I used to be really, really shy...they think I'm bullshitting. But also I think people tend to get more confident as they grow and mature with life experience.
Thanks for sharing bud.
This was one of my favorite guests on JRE I can remember listening to and I knew nothing about the guy beforehand.
The exoplanet around a star he's talking about starting at 8:40 is 51 Pegasi b
Nice.
When i met Mr.Newton. He questioned even the things he had just got answers to.
hehe aalright Peter, time for your гоголь-моголь
@@winterwarden Eggnogs my favorite. Shame nobody here can make decent one for me.
@@SlowlyWithSledge heaven is vegan
I admire scientists with their egos in check and that don't overvalue what their peers say.
Loeb's ego is off the chart.
I like Dr.Avi's thought process!
Wish this was not on spotiy, i whould loved to listen to hele hole thing.. He is so bloody smart!! and he gave me a lot of things to think about.. Thank you Levi Loeb
"Eating good food...I will not mention another example." lol
I love how his voice rises every 8 words when he gets excited lul
The way he uses analogies reminds me of me lol. As a physics student I try to make everything relatable with real life events. But when I began learning Quantum Mechanics thats when everything got shit on. Its gets more abstract as you take higher level courses and kind of detaches from "common" daily life.
I took an astronomy class in undergrad. In the last paragraph on the chapter on the Copernican revolution the textbook's author stated explicitly that there is similar revoutionary information science has uncovered but that that information is being actively supressed for socio-political reasons.
This man is already on a better path than his colleagues and even most people today. Listen to him and meditate on what he is saying. I feel it applies to all careers/ paths a person takes.
he is the sharpest cookie in the jar
Well said :)
" the sharpest cookie in the jar" 🤣
im not sure which two analogies he has combined. Why would a cookie be sharp
@@shaneviola8848 I can only think of the metaphor we use of 'Smart cookie' getting mixed up with the idiom 'Not the sharpest tool in the box', because yes, why on earth would cookies be sharp? 😂 Maybe that's what happened.
We all know what he meant tho 😅
I laughed when he said that. Especially since he was crying that nobody is open minded, while telling joe aliens could NEVER be interested us. Wouldn’t even budge on the possibility they may be curious
last tool in the shed
As a PhD student, this guy speaks the TRUTH
I like this guy and he is right. Everything is a conspiracy theory until evidence is found to legitimize it. Lack of evidence does not mean its not true. It is difficult to discern what is bs from what are legitimate hypotheses. Just have an open but skeptical mind.
I still love this show but since it has gone to spotify I have not listened as much 😔
Joe: this guy has more and better analogies than me!!
Rogan
It blows my mind that some scientists don't want to find new things that might question the things in our universe that we THINK are the way things work in our universe. I would think finding something new would be a spectacular lifetime discovery to be exceptionally proud of.
This man shared life advice whilst talking science. Super knowledgeable man right there.
I’ve been saying this for years. Doctors, Dentists, scientists, and physicists are the most close-minded people you’ll ever meet.
I am physicist and I am completely not open to entertaining this idea.
That's how the education system programs them. Like Albert Hoffman said higher education and the mainstream scientific establishment is designed to make you a reductionist/materialist
Dentists?
I work in customer service. I’ve seen my personality filled coworkers promote to managers and become people who you’d think got their tongues cut out. Depending on the environment you really have to go against the “mental programming” to sustain freewill like “openness”
Don't forget lawyers!
"understanding the world is what humans are capable of doing, and thats a deeper lvl of enjoying life"
thath deep yo
This guy is great! Really back to the true elements of what science really is. Not caring about his social status or fame. Question everything, be curious! We need more people open minded.
The world is flat. 🙂
So true! When you get to a point of growing up you loose imagination and want to just focus on status and making moneu instead of making mistakes and realizing what life can show you
"If you step on the grass it doesn't grow" thats a great saying.
I also liked the birthing the baby regrind scientific discoveries.
This LEX FRIDMAN Experience is awesome
Avi is better on Fridman, b/c he gives him more room to expand on what he's saying & doesn't get argumentative (every one of Rogan's arguments against Loeb are bad)
Yes,Lex is great ! Incredible guests ! He is frankly the best person on TH-cam right now. Where ever he will go, I will follow ;)
I was going to comment that I haven’t listened to a single JRE podcast since it went to Spotify... Then I realized that everyone else already did 😂 It literally feels like Joe Rogan died
Whenever someone suggests a change in thinking or practice for the betterment or advancement of society there's a point while they're making their case where I realize that the process of making said change is unfurling right in front of me. "We need to stop rejecting ideas to more quickly and effectively progress scientific advancements," and the process of doing this is by making the case. It feels as though doing so is as easy done as it is said, and my realization challenges that perspective and always blows my mind. There is a universe in the future where humanity does not allow social or ego based objections to combat progression and it will be moments like this video podcast that will have been the catalyst for doing so. If it is meant to be, it will be and time is the heaviest factor.
This man is speaking the absolute truth, academia is more like dark age religion in its ideation, systemic structure, and criticism of new ideas than its ever been due to ego and greed. The very people meant to be the brightest explorers of our universal understanding are turning more and more tribal/insular. So much of it stems from society's systems as a whole that the only real change will be from those of us newly entering the academic frontier.
If you are entering academia right now please do not continue down the path we are taking and be willing to open your mind to new ideas. In this way we will go further faster than ever before.
If you read this then keep on keeping on :)
What's funny is that actually led to a big fallout in the Christian community.
Too many politics and corruption eroded the scientific principles many scientists and thinkers valued. It made the faith weaker as whole. In principle, being averse to risks only destroys the fabric that made the faith great in the first place.
@@vovamays1 what's the project about?
@@vovamays1 You are welcome to quote my comment or use a picture of it however I am not comfortable with an interview, good luck with your project. Regardless of whether or not you use the comment I would love to see the end result
I first learned about the cosmic perspective from Carl Sagan. Love this guys take on it. It reminds me a lot of Buddhist philosophy.
We need more people like this guy
This is how a real scientist should think. Respect. I have witnessed the same closed mindedness in the academia during my studies at the university as well.
6:48 “I will not mention the other example” this was so hilarious, idk how Joe didn’t laugh
I read your comment at the exact time he just said it, that was amazing hahaha
his examples dont relate to what he's trying to convey
This guy speaks truth. The scientific community is full of self-importance.
100%
One of the reasons I prefer Michio over Neil. I feel Neil will poopoo or laugh at questions as nonsense. Michio will tell you no and give a reason for why not then give an example of how it Might be possible. I know its just different styles of communicating science to the masses but I find I prefer also hearing how something might be possible.
@@robert48044 Neil is a pretty good example. The guy has a hugely inflated ego. He revels in being an “authority” on a subject. That’s a big problem w scientists
@@robert48044 Agreed.
wuuuuuuuuuuut there are videos on spotify ? Thanks lol
My mom is a nurse of 20 + years, she manages ICU and cath lab. She just recently took the vaccine and she’s very sick as a result atm. Coughing a lot and feeling very bad. Not hospitalized but says she’s feeling very sick. The rest of us are good so right now.
Playback on Spotify is fucking horrendous
Playback? What do you mean
@@CE-vd2px Playback meaning the listening experience of the podcast. On Apple you just hit play and off you go. Close the app and when you come back your right there ready to go where you left off. Never paused for who knows what fkn reason.. Offline listening with auto downloads. Overall the listening experience was WAY better on Apple.. but I’m muttling thru.
@@bbkmitch Spotify is ass when I’m in my car, just too many ads you can’t skip too. I always end up throwing music on without ads
@@dantheanimator5072 thats bc you didnt pay for spotify
For someone who was born in 97’ once I found out that until 1995 people didn’t think there were exoplanets I thought that was insane. Growing up I thought it was just common sense.
Born in 1961. Everybody knew there were exoplanets. It just wasn't scientifically proven. But very few people doubted they existed.
so much respect for Professor Loeb.
What's spotify?
As the old saying goes. "Most people would rather die than think." It's a shame.
This one hit home.