Quite old, but indeed! I use it on my budget PC, and it runs just fine. Might need a bit of tweaking for modern PC's though, and you will need to fill it with addons for good graphics, i'd say it's good.
I use FS2004 Update the waypoints to the latest Airac and use Aircraft with the latest update of Airac and FMC usage (which is a must) Never crashes and great feel and I prefer it to X which I have too.
The eye candy in the newer systems is outstanding but I really like the actual aircraft performance characteristics in FS9 and besides, the new sims do not have older airliners ie 707, 727, L-1011 I'm old school ;)
Still a huge fan of FS9 here. My drawers are full of scenery, environment, and aircrafts addons, that barely affect FPS rates. Try that with chronic FSX with it's annoying CDT's and OOM's, even with all the tweaking in the world.
I also still fly FS2002 (Pro) combined with magnificent FS Global and Traffic 2004. Awesome airplanes, detailed airports and scenery, are still available on dvd`s and the net. Water droplets effects on windshields, and corresponding sounds of rain on fuselage, are still remarkable to this day, in my humble opinion. No problems with FPS rates at full settings, that's for sure! And certainly no CDT's and annoying OOM`s either. My OS still runs on Windows XP just for FS2002, FS2004, and "temperamental" FSX... I suggest to you strongly to buy on E__y, the irresistible Emma Fields scenery dvd, made by defunct Lago. Check out Cushman Lake and field just next door, with the rustic log cabin and beautiful horse. You will not believe the eye candy and little humor waiting for you. So long fellow virtual pilot.
I still fly on occasions the much more "modern'" FS2002 Pro, with great addons... FS9 though is my favorite. No CDT's and OOM's issues as with my FSX (boxed). Do you have a separate PC for FS98 and FS2000, and what is your OS? Mine is still on XP.
Alleluia ! Another member of the club ;-) it makes me feel less "alone and stupid" (LOL)... In the FS community and virtual pilots forums I often feel like being "the old-fashion guy still using FS9". And I'm happy to hear your words which are the same as mine when I have to justify myself... So THANK YOU !
For me: FS2004 gives a better perspective for navigation, especially when using chart VOR or ILS approaches, day, night or in the soup. I also find the voice ATC gives real world to the above.
@@sylvesterstewart868 I have an old PC with intel core2....4Gb of RAM, onboard graphic card, really not much. With all addon and aircraft and scenery now its totaling to26Gb, But its still enjoyable.
I'm still using FS2004 too for pretty much the same reasons as you. It's testament to the designers of this simulator that it's still relevant for so many people!
Same here, I'm streaming sometimes FS2004 and people don't understand why I don't switch over P3D/FSX or X-Plane. I spent a lot of money on this game, it's rock solid and never crashes and I don't play FS2004 for graphics but for some IFR navigation.
I still fly FS9 For three reasons. 1. I can I can turn it to maximum settings without it dragging on my computer. 2. I have a hanger full of Pan Am aircraft from the DC-3 to the A-380, no way am I hunting those aircraft in FSX down again. 3. It is very user friendly as are the add-ons
I completely understand where you are coming :) I`ve been using FSX/FSX SE for 4/5 years and I have to say the problems are endless :/ Its almost impossible to get everything working properly without a problem.
I purchased MS Flight Simulator 2020 recently. Was a continuous user of FS 98, FS 2000, FS 2002, FS 2004 and FS X. Made many scenery files for FS 98 and FS 2000. Took a break for about 7 years. I recently reinstalled FS 2004. It was a tad tricky to get it installed on Windows 10. I found the 2020 version scenery to be incredible. Frame rates are a tad low but the game is not choppy if I don't run the display settings too high. Too bad the FS 2004 version was much more fun with the joystick. Even the small Cessna planes are all over the place in the 2020 version. I still remember the keyboard controls and still struggling with the 2020 version.
I moved to FSX and then P3D because they improved the error handling which meant fewer crashes due to scenery. If that weren't the case I would still be using it. FS9 was my favorite. Great video by the way. I am like you, the experience must be smooth to be acceptable. I can't understand how some people deal with extremely low frame rates just to use the newest, hottest thing. LM does indeed release too many versions of P3D. I wish they would wait longer to allow the community to catch up. One of the biggest changes in FS has been the move to 64 bit in P3D. Major change that really helps stability.
To be honest, for me Prepar3D V4 (64-bit) is and feels like the new FS2004. It just works and it is smooth, no crashes etc. and I just love flying in it. Prepar3D V3 was good too, but limited to 4GB virtual memory and sometimes a crash. I totally skipped FSX and in hindsight I'm very glad I did :P. And indeed, FS2004 is still a great sim, I just loved its stability and smoothness :).
Yeah!! Thank you for this video! I have been feeling 'old fashioned' for several years, not getting the newer FSX and still staying.... err: flying, the beautiful FS9. I had so many good hours and days with it. Usuall I love flying the little Piper Cub (landing is almost impossible though!), it gives me the feeling of flying. Last project was from Seattle to the Florida Keys, took me all in all almost three years. Later I learned how to fly helicopters. But only a few years ago I began to fly airliners, B737, a320, a330 and now first flight with B747. And I still have a lot of fun and the system is running well. Have been using Flightsim a lot, even uploaded some minor things there. Good to read the expert - you - likes it as well!! Greetings from ERwin Henkel, Denmark
i got a 1500 euro system. with a i7 16 gigs of ram a ssd and a gtx860m And FSX is still giving me tons of performance issues. In the longer I run the game the worse my frame rate gets. expecially during landing. Usually it is better for me to save and reload before I start my final approach. And that is without alot of addons. So I have also decided to go back to fs2004. Yes I am going back to fs2004 in 2016. Because the performance in that is so great and with a few addons the graphics can be quite good for its time comparable to default fsx atleast.
No no no you can go for P3D, I have Xeon E3 + 970 and having performance issues with FSX but pretty smooth with prepar, as long as your computer is in relatively high spec , but seriously I need to check recent exchange rates, that thing worth 1700 euro is not making sense to me.
the problem with FSX is, that FSX is an old program that did not have a technology of "separating tasks to different cores." FSX were introduced just before the dual-core CPU were introduced. so if you are using 4-core or 8-core CPU, your computer most likely ONLY using one of those cores, which makes it REAL slow. so..... newer simulators? P3D has this problem pretty much fixed, but it is expensive..
I've been away from Flight Sim for about 5 years and just fired up MSFS-9 again! From about 2004-5 to 2018 I spent hundreds (THOUSANDS?) of hours researching, building scenery (SBuilder), adding Mods and aircraft to fly replicated historic flights in Golden wings by Lynn and Bill Lyons! I just flew Jorge Chávez's 1910 flight across the alps in a Bleriot! I bought FSX and I'm going to try it this winter! We'll see if it can match what I get from FS9!
Its 2022 and I have never changed flightsims. I bought the game in 2003 for early release I used it to practice flight lessons for my private pilots license. I've upgraded everything to make the graphics better. I even started making my own photo scenery. It looks nearly as good as FS2020 but runs way better plus I have hundreds of add-ons that are not available for FS2020 FS2004 for life!!!
Here it is 2017, and I still use it! FS9 can still bring a realistic experience and their are still new add ons that I havent seen. I am still buying new stuff all the time.
Certainly nothing to be ashamed of. I too thought that your videos were with FSX - just goes to show that graphics aren't that important and its the quality of the flight that makes it look realistic. Anyway carry on regardless I love your videos!
Anche se ti rispondo dopo 7 anni che hai fatto questo video che anch'io sto usando fs9 x me lo reputo a parere mio il miglior simulatore x semplicità nEl modificare aspetti e parametri e soprattutto è l'unico sim che puoi pomparlo al massimo senza calo di frame, e poi Cia tutto e lo puoi personalizzare come vuoi. Ed è anche un onore possederlo x quando uscì si celebrarono i 100 anni dal 1 volo dei fratelli Waits. Quindi è x me un grande onore nell'usarlo ancora. Fs9 Forever ❤
You see, same situation now with FSX and FS 2020! Tons of good and expensive addon, ORBX, A2A aircraft, Accusim on one hand, running well enough with very high settings between 60 and 200 fps on a high end system and a still very buggy and faulty new sim with tons of eye candy on the other hand. Not prepared to spend thousands of dollars again for MS FS for all that beautiful addon. At least not with my crappy slow internet. Once the new sim will be in a working condition and good enough to play it offline or precached I‘ll see....maybe.... 😃 Thx for your work, regards from bush flying in South America, Mike 👍♥️
Even with patience, tweaking, various adjustments, and experimenting, FSX (in my own experience and others too...) I will sooner or later, be rewarded with a "CDT" or "OOM" event. It is on very rare occasions that this happens on FS9, usually at certain add-on airports, with add-on aircraft, with rain and detailed clouds, combined with lightning. Again, these on very rare occurrence. I have almost "thrown the towel" with FSX, having to use it in clear weather and with low scenery settings, to suppress those exasperating issues. Must admit though that those wet runways on FSX, sure are stunning. With my drawers full of add ons for FS9, it is quite beautiful to be honest with you. The old girl doesn't really show her age with them. Thank you for keeping the flame alive, as well as all the other faithful virtual pilots still dedicated to good old FS2004. Frame rates of heaven, to put mildly...
I have switched to Prepar3D in the mean time. I must say, it's kind of like FS9, but than in a new coat without the OOMs and CTDs that FSX users often experience. I have made quite a couple of flights with it so far, never had any issues. So, if you ever decide to upgrade, leave FSX as it is, and go for Prepar3D ;)
Thank you for taking time to reply and excellent suggestion. My old PC (Dinosaure) is certainly not able to cope with the system requirements of fantastic Prepar3D. I have been revisiting some of my old fighter plane/combat helicopter "games" lately. Wings over Vietnam and Europe, LOMAC Gold, Strike Fighters 1, Comanche 4, Apache Havoc, and Gunship to name just a few, were really ahead of their times in graphics and executions. I know that this is entirely another subject than MSFS, but my antiquated Windows XP is awesome with them. Thanks again for your reply, and all your beautifully made instructive video presentations. So long fellow virtual(real?) pilot.
Did you have both FSX boxed and SE on the same OS? If you did, you must of created a partition just so that all hell would not break loose on your PC I imagine? I will soon get an old/new PC with windows 7-64 with FSX SE and get PreparD version 2 (because of my specs). I agree with you entirely with the complicated licenses agreements of L.M. I will just fork out the $200.00 bucks, it will be my own X-Mas present. I still have XP just for MSFS-2002-FS9-and FSX Deluxe. Tons and tons of add-ons for all three. I also love Wings over Vietnam, Israel, and Europe, Strike Fighters and Gold, and Eagle Gold. All of them by famed designer Tsuyoshi Kawahito. Sublime on XP via Third Wire productions. So long fellow virtual pilot. CYUL.
Haha Eliezer, I'm 68 and I'm an FS9 user. Started out with (FS98, then FS2000, FS2002, FS9 and FSX. After a week or so, I switched back to FS9. I still take the odd FSX flight, but FS9 is the one I use. Also the spot view is more to my liking. That was probably half of the reason I switched back, and also I spent a lot of hours manipulating a few scenery areas and adding my own airports. My scenery designs weren't compatible with FSX, so that was also a big part of staying with FS9. All in all, I just prefer it to the others. I'm running Windows 7, but loved XP. The new FS2020 seems kind of interesting though, but now we are talking about a minimum of a new computer (again!), another OS, and who knows what else. Addons, and lots of extra time spent tweaking are also factors. Good video. I gave a thumbs up and subscribed.
Great info, I used to use FSX and enjoyed it, put a lot of money into it however I made the move to X-Plane because the flight dynamics are amazing. On a cloudy day in the 757 at Leeds I can achieve 30-35fps. I don't experience many crashes, around 1 every 150 flights which means that 9 out of 10 times I am fine. Thank you for your video and I have learned a lot from it.
I still use FS9. Cause I have been flying for a virtual airlne for 21 years. I love the stability that FS9 offers on long hauls... I don't get CTD's on final.... And the 2nd reason I still fly FS9. I have spent thousands of dollars on payware addons.... (Every PMDG aircraft, other PW aircraft, Live Traffic, Live Wx, Orbx Scenery, Flight1 Scenery, Many of my custom liveries skinned by me, Etc...)
Yaaaayyyy great video 2020 and STILL ROCKING WITH FS2004! I also recreate WW2 airfields in the UK and some other countries. I go out and research every base and then if i need to i recreate buildings in Sketch up to put onto the airfields for maximum authenticity and respect to those who never returned or flew from those bases. The best design programs were only made for FS2004! I was photographing and surveying at the derelict RAF/ USAF Grafton Underwood one time and was honoured to be there when a Willys Jeep rolled up driven by a young Brit guy and his 2 passengers were there for the anniversary of the base closing. Real Veteran B17 pilots! RESPECT! I told them about my project and they helped me create buildings from their base! Even the camp cinema! I do what i do to honour all Vets United States and all other allies who made the ultimate sacrifice. Flight Simulator 7 allows mw to do this, later ones DONT. Like Windows 7 I ONLY use windows 7 as i had to give up my XP😢 Microsoft need to recognise their BEST PROGRAMS and OS systems and just update them! Everyone knows everything after Win7 are just pants.......MORE bugs than a truck windshield in mid summer and soooo unreliable. I dont want an OS or a sim program that gives me the ‘blue screen of death’ or dumps a design i have been working months or YEARS on🤷🏼♂️ I am an ex Royal Air Force aircraft engineer and flew choppers towards the end of my career. Now i am doing my private pilot licence and our flying school have a simulator aircraft set up for bad weather days to practice navigation and IFR. What sim programme do they use? FS2004 of course. Microsoft......Bill Gates.....PLEASE LISTEN to your devoted fans who KNOW what they are talking about, i also build and program PC’s and computer systems and most of our industrial systems still use WINDOWS XP! Because it was THE BEST the same that FS9 IS. How about a make over of FS2004\ Win 7 keeping the, fundamentally unaltered just a little improved? 😃 if you need suggestions just ASK us Mr Gates Thank You! The new FS 2020 needs to be totally AWSOME and maybe have built in design editors.......to equal FS2004! Oooh yes and my add on aircraft and aircraft textures and repaints only work in FS2004 I served on the Vickers VC10 in the RAF and the add on aircraft only works in FS2004 so ........I use it and am keeping it!
I still use FS2004 because my childhood and flight training was built around this game. Also, I like to keep the separation of realism to simulation so that way I do not get discouraged in getting my actual private pilot license. Real life is the best flight experience than any simulator.
I made the switch to P3D a couple of years back. It's a dream now that I have a new system. I still use FS9 as my "classic" sim etc early 90's AI with Radar Contact, RFP 747 Classic, Level D... P3D may be superior in terms of addons and graphics but I have to say I still have just as much fun with FS9 :-)
good video I've been using fs2004 for 10 years, I can fill it with add-ons real trees grass etc real airport lighting the list goes on I could never run the fsx on the funds I had but of course along with new add-ons all the time 2004 I wouldn't change to fsx besidesfs2004 gets better and better thanks for sharing your videos their awesome
You nailed it bud. Im an FS9 junky myself. I have at last count,1212 aircraft... not to mention a hell of a lot of add ons.Modifying my files to fit my system,and getting things looking and performing as I'd like is too much to give up. And you are so right about affording a system that can run the newer sims. I have FSX,and its in the box,collecting dust. Bottom line...I enjoy FS9.I have years invested in building it to the level that I am happy with. And...something that I noticed about a LOT of FSX simmers... They are snooty,snotty twigs.Not all of them.But a LOT of them. They run us FS9ers down and for what? As long as we're happy and they arent paying for our time,screw them.And...this joke that FS9 is a thing of the past is BS. There are THOUSANDS OF US,and there are still many sites out there that carry add ons for us. I think those FSXers that run us down would spend their time better by sticking their nose in their own game and let US do our thing. It'll be a cold day in hell before I go to FSX and do story trading with FSXers when its gamers are,for the most part, a bunch of rich,spoiled,mouthy brat twigs that enjoy attempting to put us down,when the truth be known,WE ARE QUITE HAPPY WITH OUR SIM. Enjoyed your video.
I m also using FS2004. The reason why I use it, is because I have many add-ons and I am refusing to start all over every time to rebuy everything for a new simulator.
I use FSX:SE and have no crashes. I only get lower frames at dense urban areas and I have a pc for a little less than 1000 €. I use orbx global, vector, lc, asn, pmdg ngx, majestic dash 8, rex soft clouds, flytampa and aerosoft airports.. all on high but not max settings.
Groot gelijk, wanneer 2004 goed bevalt lekker mee blijven vliegen. De scenery en landclasse zijn op 37000 feet niet relevant daarentegen de airports weer wel. Echter de meeste addon ontwikkelaars borduren verder op FSX/Steam en P3D. De IFly is in deze dan een zeer goed alternatief om in 2004 mee te blijven vliegen..
+Vincent Gerrits Jazeker, dat klopt. Op een gegeven moment wordt het waarschijnlijk wel tijd om te switchen omdat de ontwikkelaars inderdaad alleen verder gaan met FSX and P3D, maar voorlopig nog niet ;)
I see your point with staying with FS2004. I ran FS2004 for many years after FSX was released, until the NGX from PMDG. Then seeing the difference between the NGX in FSX and the iFly 737 in FS2004 was enough to make me switch. It was a love hate relationship with FSX and took me a while to get things working well, however there is a lot of help on the net and a lot of help in the community. I held off moving to P3D originally as I say it as a rebranding on FSX, except with many addons not working or not being licenced. I did get FSX:Steam when it was on offer and that was a lot easier to deal with and a lot smoother. Then LM released P3Dv3, developers got on board with their addons and I would never look back. It is easy to install, has next to no tweaking and runs so much better with no stutters.
You guys should try flying FS2 on an IBM PC with CGA graphics. Extremely low frame rate, barely distinguishable details, 4 colors (yes, that's 4) etc... Believe it or not I still fly it on occasion just for kicks! We have come a long way, so FS2004 is just fine by me :)
I've had it since ~2006. The box is worn and dusty by now, but the Level-D 767 has become a bit of a sound design baby for me lately, and I've been putting in way more hours in FS9 than I ever thought I would the past two years lol If I knew my way around that new sound engine MSFS uses then I'd love to work with it too. I prefer that game for my low-and-slow VFR flights using sectionals.
still operational for me..not willing to give up more than 300 sceneries all over the world and the aircraft ..i like this new Flight Simulator, but i do not have a powerfull computer to run it..but from what i`ve seen, having the real lanscape depicted on flight is very good..but if you dont have a very good PC..
Yep, still the best in my opinion. I never bought another Flight Sim after that. I was holding out for something a lot better before I did. I think the new FS2020 will be worth the upgrade.
I played Fs2004 until about early 2015. So far with P3D/FSX, I constantly run out of memory, crash and a bunch of other stuff. That was the main reason it took me so long to switch.
I also use FS2004 on Windows 10 x64 Pro - and its smooth as silk, fast and stable. Graphics are superb - its an epitome ! Much like why IL2:1946 and Lock On have as large a fan-base :-)
I am a huge fan of FS9, in fact my OS is still on XP just for FS2002-FS9-and FSX. I will be getting a new/old PC on windows 7-64 bit, and I am ready for serious computer gymnastics to get it to fly in W 7 combined with my tons of add-ons. You must be a computer guru to have succeeded in making function on W-10X64. Just beware of automatic updates that might complicate things all of a sudden. I am also big fan of flying combat sims by famed designer Tsuyoshi Kawahito: Wings over Vietnam-Europe-Israel, Strike Fighters Project 1 and Gold Edition, plus Eagles Gold. All of them on Third Wire Productions. Bon vols virtuel!
+LUX Spotting OK, maybe my $5000 estimate was a bit exagerated, but still, 30 fps is not 60 fps, and then I still have the other points that I have mentioned. Also: in FS2004 you have raindrops on the VC windscreen! :)
FS9 is a winner. I have near-identical reasons for still flightsimming with it today: there's a lot to download for it and if properly tuned, it WILL get you good performance on a mediocre system (as I have). I know two people who switched to the latest FS and they are generally disappointed with its behavior: flightsimming is okay, visually attractive, but who wants to wait for a 80 Gb update (!!) before being able to "kick the tires and light the fires" ??
I used to fly FS9 in a laptop, then i bought a gamming pc and switched to FSX, bought software and hardware...took me months and research to stop it from crashing...then another problem showed up: framerates... I'm having good framerates but having my graphics below medium...i would like to go back to FS9, but i would feel like like i waste my money
Travel Service (or also Smartwings) is Czech company. Always when we drive in Prague around the airport, I can see their main hangar. I see that you use a lot of Czech content and add-ons :) Maybe you should try flying a short route from Prague (LKPR) to Pardubice (LKPD) (I live in Pardubice :D)
+Pavel Grulich Haha, yes I do. I have made quite a few short flights in the past from like LKKV to LKPR and then to LKTB, but I haven't tried out LKPD yet ;)
Watched your video about FS2004 and flying some of the classic planes. You inspired me to dig out my copy and load it on my PC. It installed just fine, but the sim itself would not launch. If you did anything special to prepare your PC, l'd love to try it myself.
@@AviationPro Yes! I forgot that I had that patch. Everything is working great, especially enjoying revisiting Meigs field in Chicago. Also, I could see in my list of files lots of add-on AC and scenery. Thanks again for the inspiration!
I agree they reached a good level of simulation. I am still on 2004 on a 3 year old pc works fine. I like the F-15 strike eagle don't know how to add scene . help sos ! this all can afford now. Thanks for share
FS2004 is what I use as well I have FSX SE but I only get about 30 frames in the NGX/777 by PMDG which is decent but I like fs2004 because I can get around 80-100 in the PMDG 737
if you want learn how fly it nothing like 2004. i dont like when you are final aproach and the grafics stop for few seconds .in fsx hapen a lot i use fsx ones but no more.
![FLIGHT SIMULATOR VIDEO GAMES EVOLUTION [1979 - 2023]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cXQea59lorw/mqdefault.jpg)
FS2004 helped me got my first job. Hours and hours training IFR on Baron 58, when I did the assessment on sim, it was a analogic twin, very similar!!
Pretty good graphics for a game older than me!!
Haha :)
With all the wonderful available addon software for FS9, the "old girl" sure can make people heads turn, big time!
It's 3 years older than me, I was born in 2006 😂
Oh god.. I'm 38. I'm so old 😫😩🧑🦲🧑🦲🧑🦲
Nailed it! It’s 2019 and I run it still and it runs fantastic.
Nice! :)
I still use fs2004, and it’s 2019 and I don’t feel bad about myself lol
Fs9 the Best fs made by Microsoft. All the rest not that good.
@Vennyyo i get 100 fsx no mods and 100 fs9 with mods
True its still beats iL-2 1946 and its a newer game
@Vennyyo easily 60fps on 1080p low
Me in 2020 on my low end PC and get good frames
I still use FS2004 as well and it is just great for me
B747X Hi is it good? Because I would like a flight simulator
Quite old, but indeed! I use it on my budget PC, and it runs just fine.
Might need a bit of tweaking for modern PC's though, and you will need to fill it with addons for good graphics, i'd say it's good.
I use FS2004
Update the waypoints to the latest Airac and use Aircraft with the latest update of Airac and FMC usage (which is a must)
Never crashes and great feel and I prefer it to X which I have too.
@@angeavi46 it is amazing in gameplay you can put failures it it will not crash because it's older and it makes it better
never really thought about using my computer for older sim . but it makes since
Still using it. I have so many add-ons, plus the current real weather program and similar. I fly about 4 hours per week, still loving it!
The eye candy in the newer systems is outstanding but I really like the actual aircraft performance characteristics in FS9 and besides, the new sims do not have older airliners ie 707, 727, L-1011
I'm old school ;)
when I was 6 years old, I still remember my brother play FS2004, with Tupolev aircraft mods
Haha, good old days ;)
I still use FS2004 because I have 30 aircraft in my hangar and I'm not about to try to replace them all in FSX!
Fs 2004 the Best and I have every simulator you can think of.
And by the way just install add on then you have fax light in fs2004.
Can’t you just import them into FSX?
@@theobserver4214 actually, a month after I wrote that I got FSX running. Now I have a full hanger and a new simulator comes out!!
@@RTCMAHL OOF
@@RTCMAHL MSFS isn’t that good, FSX and FS2004 is the beat
0:52 I use the FS9 because of that too. It's nice!
:D
Not only that . But is also very light . Work with any pc .
I'm with you. FS2004 (FS9) is the only Sim I have installed. Still works great.
Still a huge fan of FS9 here.
My drawers are full of scenery, environment, and aircrafts addons, that barely affect FPS rates.
Try that with chronic FSX with it's annoying CDT's and OOM's, even with all the tweaking in the world.
Add more fs9 the only simulator have safe mood. And that is very important for add-on.
@@jaroslawpiwar5811
It doesn't matter what system you are using as long light and work in proper order.
Window 7. 64 ..
I got FS2002 a decade ago and I still play it
I also still fly FS2002 (Pro) combined with magnificent FS Global and Traffic 2004. Awesome airplanes, detailed airports and scenery, are still available on dvd`s and the net.
Water droplets effects on windshields, and corresponding sounds of rain on fuselage, are still remarkable to this day, in my humble opinion.
No problems with FPS rates at full settings, that's for sure!
And certainly no CDT's and annoying OOM`s either.
My OS still runs on Windows XP just for FS2002, FS2004, and "temperamental" FSX...
I suggest to you strongly to buy on E__y, the irresistible Emma Fields scenery dvd, made by defunct Lago.
Check out Cushman Lake and field just next door, with the rustic log cabin and beautiful horse.
You will not believe the eye candy and little humor waiting for you.
So long fellow virtual pilot.
Well done!
good on you mate I still use fs 98 and 2000
I still fly on occasions the much more "modern'" FS2002 Pro, with great addons...
FS9 though is my favorite.
No CDT's and OOM's issues as with my FSX (boxed).
Do you have a separate PC for FS98 and FS2000, and what is your OS?
Mine is still on XP.
Alleluia ! Another member of the club ;-) it makes me feel less "alone and stupid" (LOL)... In the FS community and virtual pilots forums I often feel like being "the old-fashion guy still using FS9". And I'm happy to hear your words which are the same as mine when I have to justify myself... So THANK YOU !
still flying fs9 in 2020, too. love this sim.
For me: FS2004 gives a better perspective for navigation, especially when using chart VOR or ILS approaches, day, night or in the soup. I also find the voice ATC gives real world to the above.
Very good sir. I'm happy you are still enjoying FS2004.
Thanks! ;)
Iam 65, I still fly on FS 2004...and still enjoying it.
What do you fly on it?
@@sylvesterstewart868 I have an old PC with intel core2....4Gb of RAM, onboard graphic card, really not much. With all addon and aircraft and scenery now its totaling to26Gb, But its still enjoyable.
I'm still using FS2004 too for pretty much the same reasons as you. It's testament to the designers of this simulator that it's still relevant for so many people!
Apart from the other advantages, the most important that I develop continously my plane with xml code gauges (B738, and now MAX8)
Same here, I'm streaming sometimes FS2004 and people don't understand why I don't switch over P3D/FSX or X-Plane. I spent a lot of money on this game, it's rock solid and never crashes and I don't play FS2004 for graphics but for some IFR navigation.
Looks as good as anything else. Fs9 best thing I ever bought. Having more fun than ever with old planes and celestial navigation.
I still fly FS9 For three reasons.
1. I can I can turn it to maximum settings without it dragging on my computer.
2. I have a hanger full of Pan Am aircraft from the DC-3 to the A-380, no way am I hunting those aircraft in FSX down again.
3. It is very user friendly as are the add-ons
Great vid!! I still use FS2004 and very proud to do it.
+Piloto de avión Thanks!
I completely understand where you are coming :) I`ve been using FSX/FSX SE for 4/5 years and I have to say the problems are endless :/ Its almost impossible to get everything working properly without a problem.
+GeminiJetsAerLingus Thanks for your comment! :)
my friends dad is the head atc controller at EGCC uk and he still uses fs2004
I used to until FSX came out. FS9 was great though
+Elliott Hayot Used to run FSX until my PC went out. FS9 still is great and I'll never go back to FSX. FS9 or XP10 now.
Awsome
I still use it also, it is just very good
Used fs2004 for years... The thing that made me switch two years ago are smooth gauges in the new sim
You do RIGHT! Good decision.
I purchased MS Flight Simulator 2020 recently. Was a continuous user of FS 98, FS 2000, FS 2002, FS 2004 and FS X. Made many scenery files for FS 98 and FS 2000. Took a break for about 7 years. I recently reinstalled FS 2004. It was a tad tricky to get it installed on Windows 10. I found the 2020 version scenery to be incredible. Frame rates are a tad low but the game is not choppy if I don't run the display settings too high. Too bad the FS 2004 version was much more fun with the joystick. Even the small Cessna planes are all over the place in the 2020 version. I still remember the keyboard controls and still struggling with the 2020 version.
I moved to FSX and then P3D because they improved the error handling which meant fewer crashes due to scenery. If that weren't the case I would still be using it. FS9 was my favorite. Great video by the way. I am like you, the experience must be smooth to be acceptable. I can't understand how some people deal with extremely low frame rates just to use the newest, hottest thing. LM does indeed release too many versions of P3D. I wish they would wait longer to allow the community to catch up. One of the biggest changes in FS has been the move to 64 bit in P3D. Major change that really helps stability.
To be honest, for me Prepar3D V4 (64-bit) is and feels like the new FS2004. It just works and it is smooth, no crashes etc. and I just love flying in it. Prepar3D V3 was good too, but limited to 4GB virtual memory and sometimes a crash. I totally skipped FSX and in hindsight I'm very glad I did :P. And indeed, FS2004 is still a great sim, I just loved its stability and smoothness :).
Yeah!! Thank you for this video! I have been feeling 'old fashioned' for several years, not getting the newer FSX and still staying.... err: flying, the beautiful FS9.
I had so many good hours and days with it. Usuall I love flying the little Piper Cub (landing is almost impossible though!), it gives me the feeling of flying. Last project was from Seattle to the Florida Keys, took me all in all almost three years.
Later I learned how to fly helicopters. But only a few years ago I began to fly airliners, B737, a320, a330 and now first flight with B747. And I still have a lot of fun and the system is running well.
Have been using Flightsim a lot, even uploaded some minor things there.
Good to read the expert - you - likes it as well!!
Greetings from ERwin Henkel, Denmark
+daniela55dk Haha, you're welcome! :)
i got a 1500 euro system. with a i7
16 gigs of ram a ssd and a gtx860m
And FSX is still giving me tons of performance issues.
In the longer I run the game the worse my frame rate gets. expecially during landing.
Usually it is better for me to save and reload before I start my final approach.
And that is without alot of addons. So I have also decided to go back to fs2004.
Yes I am going back to fs2004 in 2016. Because the performance in that is so great and with a few addons the graphics can be quite good for its time comparable to default fsx atleast.
No no no you can go for P3D, I have Xeon E3 + 970 and having performance issues with FSX but pretty smooth with prepar, as long as your computer is in relatively high spec , but seriously I need to check recent exchange rates, that thing worth 1700 euro is not making sense to me.
praetoriancorps lol thats literally stupid try x plane instead its newer and you can get much more fps because its a newer game
Max Hammerum I know. I'm just too cheap right now to buy any new game. and i dont have room for 80 gigs on my system either.
praetoriancorps thats right
the problem with FSX is, that FSX is an old program that did not have a technology of "separating tasks to different cores." FSX were introduced just before the dual-core CPU were introduced. so if you are using 4-core or 8-core CPU, your computer most likely ONLY using one of those cores, which makes it REAL slow.
so..... newer simulators? P3D has this problem pretty much fixed, but it is expensive..
Honestly I just installed fs9 again just to slaughter it with my modern gaming pc, the inner 10 year old me is smiling...
I've been away from Flight Sim for about 5 years and just fired up MSFS-9 again! From about 2004-5 to 2018 I spent hundreds (THOUSANDS?) of hours researching, building scenery (SBuilder), adding Mods and aircraft to fly replicated historic flights in Golden wings by Lynn and Bill Lyons! I just flew Jorge Chávez's 1910 flight across the alps in a Bleriot! I bought FSX and I'm going to try it this winter! We'll see if it can match what I get from FS9!
Still running fs2004 for the exact same reasons
Its 2022 and I have never changed flightsims. I bought the game in 2003 for early release I used it to practice flight lessons for my private pilots license. I've upgraded everything to make the graphics better. I even started making my own photo scenery. It looks nearly as good as FS2020 but runs way better plus I have hundreds of add-ons that are not available for FS2020 FS2004 for life!!!
Here it is 2017, and I still use it! FS9 can still bring a realistic experience and their are still new add ons that I havent seen. I am still buying new stuff all the time.
I agree so much !!!!! Still using it with all necessary addons. Si nice framerates and good graphics !
Certainly nothing to be ashamed of. I too thought that your videos were with FSX - just goes to show that graphics aren't that important and its the quality of the flight that makes it look realistic. Anyway carry on regardless I love your videos!
+Andrew James Haha, exactly! Thanks for commenting! :)
Anche se ti rispondo dopo 7 anni che hai fatto questo video che anch'io sto usando fs9 x me lo reputo a parere mio il miglior simulatore x semplicità nEl modificare aspetti e parametri e soprattutto è l'unico sim che puoi pomparlo al massimo senza calo di frame, e poi Cia tutto e lo puoi personalizzare come vuoi. Ed è anche un onore possederlo x quando uscì si celebrarono i 100 anni dal 1 volo dei fratelli Waits. Quindi è x me un grande onore nell'usarlo ancora. Fs9 Forever ❤
I remember playing fs2004 when i was 5years old only and i remember american pacific airline that boeing 737 400 nostalgia was so...
Now i use fsx
You see, same situation now with FSX and FS 2020! Tons of good and expensive addon, ORBX, A2A aircraft, Accusim on one hand, running well enough with very high settings between 60 and 200 fps on a high end system and a still very buggy and faulty new sim with tons of eye candy on the other hand. Not prepared to spend thousands of dollars again for MS FS for all that beautiful addon. At least not with my crappy slow internet. Once the new sim will be in a working condition and good enough to play it offline or precached I‘ll see....maybe.... 😃
Thx for your work, regards from bush flying in South America, Mike 👍♥️
Best flightsim ever
Even with patience, tweaking, various adjustments, and experimenting, FSX (in my own experience and others too...) I will sooner or later, be rewarded with a "CDT" or "OOM" event.
It is on very rare occasions that this happens on FS9, usually at certain add-on airports, with add-on aircraft, with rain and detailed clouds, combined with lightning.
Again, these on very rare occurrence.
I have almost "thrown the towel" with FSX, having to use it in clear weather and with low scenery settings, to suppress those exasperating issues.
Must admit though that those wet runways on FSX, sure are stunning.
With my drawers full of add ons for FS9, it is quite beautiful to be honest with you.
The old girl doesn't really show her age with them.
Thank you for keeping the flame alive, as well as all the other faithful virtual pilots still dedicated to good old FS2004.
Frame rates of heaven, to put mildly...
I have switched to Prepar3D in the mean time. I must say, it's kind of like FS9, but than in a new coat without the OOMs and CTDs that FSX users often experience. I have made quite a couple of flights with it so far, never had any issues. So, if you ever decide to upgrade, leave FSX as it is, and go for Prepar3D ;)
Thank you for taking time to reply and excellent suggestion.
My old PC (Dinosaure) is certainly not able to cope with the system requirements of fantastic Prepar3D.
I have been revisiting some of my old fighter plane/combat helicopter "games" lately.
Wings over Vietnam and Europe, LOMAC Gold, Strike Fighters 1, Comanche 4, Apache Havoc, and Gunship to name just a few, were really ahead of their times in graphics and executions.
I know that this is entirely another subject than MSFS, but my antiquated Windows XP is awesome with them.
Thanks again for your reply, and all your beautifully made instructive video presentations.
So long fellow virtual(real?) pilot.
Did you have both FSX boxed and SE on the same OS?
If you did, you must of created a partition just so that all hell would not break loose on your PC I imagine?
I will soon get an old/new PC with windows 7-64 with FSX SE and get PreparD version 2 (because of my specs).
I agree with you entirely with the complicated licenses agreements of L.M.
I will just fork out the $200.00 bucks, it will be my own X-Mas present.
I still have XP just for MSFS-2002-FS9-and FSX Deluxe.
Tons and tons of add-ons for all three.
I also love Wings over Vietnam, Israel, and Europe, Strike Fighters and Gold, and Eagle Gold.
All of them by famed designer Tsuyoshi Kawahito.
Sublime on XP via Third Wire productions.
So long fellow virtual pilot.
CYUL.
Haha Eliezer, I'm 68 and I'm an FS9 user. Started out with (FS98, then FS2000, FS2002, FS9 and FSX. After a week or so, I switched back to FS9. I still take the odd FSX flight, but FS9 is the one I use. Also the spot view is more to my liking. That was probably half of the reason I switched back, and also I spent a lot of hours manipulating a few scenery areas and adding my own airports. My scenery designs weren't compatible with FSX, so that was also a big part of staying with FS9. All in all, I just prefer it to the others. I'm running Windows 7, but loved XP.
The new FS2020 seems kind of interesting though, but now we are talking about a minimum of a new computer (again!), another OS, and who knows what else. Addons, and lots of extra time spent tweaking are also factors.
Good video. I gave a thumbs up and subscribed.
Great info, I used to use FSX and enjoyed it, put a lot of money into it however I made the move to X-Plane because the flight dynamics are amazing. On a cloudy day in the 757 at Leeds I can achieve 30-35fps. I don't experience many crashes, around 1 every 150 flights which means that 9 out of 10 times I am fine. Thank you for your video and I have learned a lot from it.
+CharlieClass156 Thank you! :) Thanks for sharing your story.
I agree! FS 2004 and pilot edge are what I use to spend less time toward PPL.
I love the fs2004… with Track IR… alls on the right side and fly without problems… only flying….
I still use FSX and while it's newer compered to FS9 aka 2004 it's still great for me and like everything you said applied to me using FSX
I still use FS9. Cause I have been flying for a virtual airlne for 21 years. I love the stability that FS9 offers on long hauls... I don't get CTD's on final.... And the 2nd reason I still fly FS9. I have spent thousands of dollars on payware addons.... (Every PMDG aircraft, other PW aircraft, Live Traffic, Live Wx, Orbx Scenery, Flight1 Scenery, Many of my custom liveries skinned by me, Etc...)
I love this Simulator !!! You can update the scenaries, the aircrafts ecc.
I "grew up" with fsx(even tho im a 12 y/o And i love it
Yaaaayyyy great video 2020 and STILL ROCKING WITH FS2004!
I also recreate WW2 airfields in the UK and some other countries. I go out and research every base and then if i need to i recreate buildings in Sketch up to put onto the airfields for maximum authenticity and respect to those who never returned or flew from those bases. The best design programs were only made for FS2004! I was photographing and surveying at the derelict RAF/ USAF Grafton Underwood one time and was honoured to be there when a Willys Jeep rolled up driven by a young Brit guy and his 2 passengers were there for the anniversary of the base closing. Real Veteran B17 pilots! RESPECT! I told them about my project and they helped me create buildings from their base! Even the camp cinema! I do what i do to honour all Vets United States and all other allies who made the ultimate sacrifice. Flight Simulator 7 allows mw to do this, later ones DONT.
Like Windows 7 I ONLY use windows 7 as i had to give up my XP😢 Microsoft need to recognise their BEST PROGRAMS and OS systems and just update them! Everyone knows everything after Win7 are just pants.......MORE bugs than a truck windshield in mid summer and soooo unreliable. I dont want an OS or a sim program that gives me the ‘blue screen of death’ or dumps a design i have been working months or YEARS on🤷🏼♂️
I am an ex Royal Air Force aircraft engineer and flew choppers towards the end of my career. Now i am doing my private pilot licence and our flying school have a simulator aircraft set up for bad weather days to practice navigation and IFR. What sim programme do they use? FS2004 of course.
Microsoft......Bill Gates.....PLEASE LISTEN to your devoted fans who KNOW what they are talking about, i also build and program PC’s and computer systems and most of our industrial systems still use WINDOWS XP! Because it was THE BEST the same that FS9 IS.
How about a make over of FS2004\ Win 7 keeping the, fundamentally unaltered just a little improved? 😃 if you need suggestions just ASK us Mr Gates
Thank You!
The new FS 2020 needs to be totally AWSOME and maybe have built in design editors.......to equal FS2004!
Oooh yes and my add on aircraft and aircraft textures and repaints only work in FS2004 I served on the Vickers VC10 in the RAF and the add on aircraft only works in FS2004 so ........I use it and am keeping it!
I still use FS2004 because my childhood and flight training was built around this game. Also, I like to keep the separation of realism to simulation so that way I do not get discouraged in getting my actual private pilot license. Real life is the best flight experience than any simulator.
thanks for your comments.
I made the switch to P3D a couple of years back. It's a dream now that I have a new system. I still use FS9 as my "classic" sim etc early 90's AI with Radar Contact, RFP 747 Classic, Level D... P3D may be superior in terms of addons and graphics but I have to say I still have just as much fun with FS9 :-)
+Lorenzo Nesta Thanks for your comment! :)
I Love FS9!
good video I've been using fs2004 for 10 years, I can fill it with add-ons real trees grass etc real airport lighting the list goes on I could never run the fsx on the funds I had but of course along with new add-ons all the time 2004 I wouldn't change to fsx besidesfs2004 gets better and better thanks for sharing your videos their awesome
Thank you!
hey I am using fs2004 I love it its awesome its all about framerate and addon scenery
Still using fs9? I Do! (2018)
Whatever makes ya happy man.
+VeracityMedia :)
You nailed it bud.
Im an FS9 junky myself.
I have at last count,1212 aircraft...
not to mention a hell of a lot of add ons.Modifying my files to fit my system,and getting things looking and performing as I'd like is too much to give up.
And you are so right about affording a system that can run the newer sims. I have FSX,and its in the box,collecting dust.
Bottom line...I enjoy FS9.I have years invested in building it to the level that I am happy with.
And...something that I noticed about a LOT of FSX simmers...
They are snooty,snotty twigs.Not all of them.But a LOT of them.
They run us FS9ers down and for what? As long as we're happy and they arent paying for our time,screw them.And...this joke that FS9 is a thing of the past is BS.
There are THOUSANDS OF US,and there are still many sites out there that carry add ons for us.
I think those FSXers that run us down would spend their time better by sticking their nose in their own game and let US do our thing. It'll be a cold day in hell before I go to FSX and do story trading with FSXers when its gamers are,for the most part, a bunch of rich,spoiled,mouthy brat twigs that enjoy attempting to put us down,when the truth be known,WE ARE QUITE HAPPY WITH OUR SIM. Enjoyed your video.
I m also using FS2004. The reason why I use it, is because I have many add-ons and I am refusing to start all over every time to rebuy everything for a new simulator.
I use FSX:SE and have no crashes. I only get lower frames at dense urban areas and I have a pc for a little less than 1000 €. I use orbx global, vector, lc, asn, pmdg ngx, majestic dash 8, rex soft clouds, flytampa and aerosoft airports.. all on high but not max settings.
+Johnny Wing Thanks for your comment! :)
I still play this game its awesome
Thank you very much! Worked!!😃
Groot gelijk, wanneer 2004 goed bevalt lekker mee blijven vliegen. De scenery en landclasse zijn op 37000 feet niet relevant daarentegen de airports weer wel. Echter de meeste addon ontwikkelaars borduren verder op FSX/Steam en P3D. De IFly is in deze dan een zeer goed alternatief om in 2004 mee te blijven vliegen..
+Vincent Gerrits Jazeker, dat klopt. Op een gegeven moment wordt het waarschijnlijk wel tijd om te switchen omdat de ontwikkelaars inderdaad alleen verder gaan met FSX and P3D, maar voorlopig nog niet ;)
I see your point with staying with FS2004. I ran FS2004 for many years after FSX was released, until the NGX from PMDG. Then seeing the difference between the NGX in FSX and the iFly 737 in FS2004 was enough to make me switch. It was a love hate relationship with FSX and took me a while to get things working well, however there is a lot of help on the net and a lot of help in the community. I held off moving to P3D originally as I say it as a rebranding on FSX, except with many addons not working or not being licenced. I did get FSX:Steam when it was on offer and that was a lot easier to deal with and a lot smoother. Then LM released P3Dv3, developers got on board with their addons and I would never look back. It is easy to install, has next to no tweaking and runs so much better with no stutters.
+MisfitTube Thanks for your comment! Glad to hear that P3D v3 works well :)
You guys should try flying FS2 on an IBM PC with CGA graphics. Extremely low frame rate, barely distinguishable details, 4 colors (yes, that's 4) etc... Believe it or not I still fly it on occasion just for kicks! We have come a long way, so FS2004 is just fine by me :)
I've had it since ~2006. The box is worn and dusty by now, but the Level-D 767 has become a bit of a sound design baby for me lately, and I've been putting in way more hours in FS9 than I ever thought I would the past two years lol
If I knew my way around that new sound engine MSFS uses then I'd love to work with it too. I prefer that game for my low-and-slow VFR flights using sectionals.
Ich still use it with win 10. More as 30 Gigabyte Addons. And its still great. Thank you from Germany.
I'm 100% agree with you
+Valentín Air Thanks for your comment! :)
I can tell you FS9 was a hell of a lot more reliable than FSX. I spend more time troubleshooting FSX than I do flying it.
Absolutely!
still operational for me..not willing to give up more than 300 sceneries all over the world and the aircraft ..i like this new Flight Simulator, but i do not have a powerfull computer to run it..but from what i`ve seen, having the real lanscape depicted on flight is very good..but if you dont have a very good PC..
every thing you said is true
Yep, still the best in my opinion. I never bought another Flight Sim after that. I was holding out for something a lot better before I did. I think the new FS2020 will be worth the upgrade.
I played Fs2004 until about early 2015. So far with P3D/FSX, I constantly run out of memory, crash and a bunch of other stuff. That was the main reason it took me so long to switch.
+Kronesian Agreed ;)
I also use FS2004 on Windows 10 x64 Pro - and its smooth as silk, fast and stable. Graphics are superb - its an epitome ! Much like why IL2:1946 and Lock On have as large a fan-base :-)
I am a huge fan of FS9, in fact my OS is still on XP just for FS2002-FS9-and FSX.
I will be getting a new/old PC on windows 7-64 bit, and I am ready for serious computer gymnastics to get it to fly in W 7 combined with my tons of add-ons.
You must be a computer guru to have succeeded in making function on W-10X64.
Just beware of automatic updates that might complicate things all of a sudden.
I am also big fan of flying combat sims by famed designer Tsuyoshi Kawahito: Wings over Vietnam-Europe-Israel, Strike Fighters Project 1 and Gold Edition, plus Eagles Gold.
All of them on Third Wire Productions.
Bon vols virtuel!
can it support for windows 10 ?
My answer to this question is simple: Ford Trimotor.
I've got a 1200€ system and I run FSX with PMDG737, ORBX and a lot of Addon sceneries at 30-35 FPS ;-) Even on a cloudy day using ASN!
+LUX Spotting OK, maybe my $5000 estimate was a bit exagerated, but still, 30 fps is not 60 fps, and then I still have the other points that I have mentioned. Also: in FS2004 you have raindrops on the VC windscreen! :)
Yea that feature is cool but to be honest even with a 5000$ system you won't get 60FPS! ;-) 35 is already very satisfying ;-)
it´s me with FS 2002, I still use with addons, framerates ok and im happy with a basic PC( not spending a lot of money).
FS9 is a winner. I have near-identical reasons for still flightsimming with it today: there's a lot to download for it and if properly tuned, it WILL get you good performance on a mediocre system (as I have). I know two people who switched to the latest FS and they are generally disappointed with its behavior: flightsimming is okay, visually attractive, but who wants to wait for a 80 Gb update (!!) before being able to "kick the tires and light the fires" ??
I really wish I would've done this before buying fsx addons. I really am getting tired of the bad framerates
I used to fly FS9 in a laptop, then i bought a gamming pc and switched to FSX, bought software and hardware...took me months and research to stop it from crashing...then another problem showed up: framerates... I'm having good framerates but having my graphics below medium...i would like to go back to FS9, but i would feel like like i waste my money
i always save the flight during my flight for incase there is a crash....
And it had cool visual effects, too.
Travel Service (or also Smartwings) is Czech company. Always when we drive in Prague around the airport, I can see their main hangar. I see that you use a lot of Czech content and add-ons :) Maybe you should try flying a short route from Prague (LKPR) to Pardubice (LKPD) (I live in Pardubice :D)
+Pavel Grulich Haha, yes I do. I have made quite a few short flights in the past from like LKKV to LKPR and then to LKTB, but I haven't tried out LKPD yet ;)
FS2004 is AMAZING
Well done; excellent video!
Thanks! :)
Watched your video about FS2004 and flying some of the classic planes. You inspired me to dig out my copy and load it on my PC. It installed just fine, but the sim itself would not launch. If you did anything special to prepare your PC, l'd love to try it myself.
You need to get a no-cd patch for FS2004 in Windows 10, Windows 10 doesn't like old games with discs.
@@AviationPro Yes! I forgot that I had that patch. Everything is working great, especially enjoying revisiting Meigs field in Chicago. Also, I could see in my list of files lots of add-on AC and scenery. Thanks again for the inspiration!
I also use FS 2004. Less buggy and it just works 😎👍
I agree they reached a good level of simulation. I am still on 2004 on a 3 year old pc works fine. I like the F-15 strike eagle don't know how to add scene . help sos ! this all can afford now. Thanks for share
well simulator 2004 work on windows 11 appreciate the answer if you can give it to me thank you very much.
Your not alone I still use it
I still use FS2004. works great.
FS2004 is what I use as well I have FSX SE but I only get about 30 frames in the NGX/777 by PMDG which is decent but I like fs2004 because I can get around 80-100 in the PMDG 737
That is true, although I found that Prepar3D actually is very smooth even with those kind of framerates. :)
"The flying itself also has to be realistic"
FS2004 user
can't beat 2004...does a great job with minimal resources.
It’s now 20 years old
if you want learn how fly it nothing like 2004.
i dont like when you are final aproach and the grafics stop for few seconds .in fsx hapen a lot i use fsx ones but no more.