Gandalf the White's TRIGGER TRICKERY | Historic Brawl Gameplay | Magic: The Gathering
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
- This is a compilation of games from the Lord of the Rings: Tales of Middle Earth Early Access event from 6/15/23.
Gandalf the White
www.moxfield.c...
02:34 - Game 1
07:25 - Game 2
12:12 - Game 3
16:30 - Game 4
25:30 - Game 5
37:11 - Game 6
Justin on Twitter / jparnell1
Justin's Moxfield decks www.moxfield.c...
Justin on Twitch / jparnell
jparnell.carrd...
#magicthegathering #mtga #magicarena #historicbrawl #mtglotr #lotr #lotrgames
Justin I miss you on VS brother! Great seeing you play one of my favourite commanders printed in a long time
You gotta put that on a shirt or something, that simple acronym ABPWYO - Always Be Plague Winding Your Opponent. Truly words to live by.
10:54 what CAN men do against such reckless hate?
King of the Oathbreakers Voltron equipment and Shelob Value (not spiders) next please!
Shelob coming soon(tm)
Game against Tom Bombadil was totally filthy
I hit like as soon as I saw the sundering titan used to terraform the opponent's boardstate. Amazing!
Appropriate use of the word terraform!
I'm surprised to see no PWers. Ugin and The Eternal Wanderer would work great in this deck to reduce the cost of artifacts and blink them. They're legendary spells so they'd have flash as well.
Eternal Wanderer is in the deck, but I agree Ugin the Ineffable would be great too.
so, part of the ability on your ring bear is it becomes legendary, does that not mean it counts as a legendary creature in terms of legend rule with cards of the same name?!? i see he has 2 Nazgul in play, one is ring bearer it was to my understanding both couldn't be in play :S is this a bug or am i tripping
Good question! If you have two creature that have the same name and BOTH are Legendary, the rule would apply. If only one is Legendary (like the ring bearer) then they'd both be fine.
Paradox engine?
Liked & Subscribed
Now whats your opinion on this commander will he replace MOM or is she still objectively better?
I think Norn is better- often times the negation of abilities has a bigger impact than doubling yours. Still nice to have another effect in white though!
@JParnellMTG yea I agree maby just a better commander for table top sense u don't annoy your friends as much 😅
@@super_ninja9375 That part I agree with!
Can we request a Galadriel of Lothlorien vid? She’s epic and it’s an archetype that I have really seen played
You may- a UG scry-matters deck is definitely in our future
I don't understand your deck builds. You literally label it the gandalf deck build but I built this exact deck and honestly I almost never actually draw gandalf what's the point of these builds when you barely ever get to use the cards your showing off. Don't get me wrong I have enjoyed using the deck it's just with almost 100 cards in it the main draw doesn't happened very often.
That is unfortunately the nature of a 100 card singleton format. Sometimes your draws line up and you have an easier time executing you game plan, and sometimes you don't.
@JParnellMTG again I still have enjoyed using the deck I was just being salty over a couple close matches with the deck lol ignore my childish whining. I made a full food/halfling deck that is doing very very well.
It sounds like you were playing in the wrong format. Gandalf is the commander, so you don't draw it; it's in the command zone, not the deck.