After having practiced law for several years, Field became convinced that the common law in America, and particularly in New York state, needed radical changes to unify and simplify its procedure. In 1836, he went to Europe to investigate the courts, procedure, and codes of England, France and other countries. He then returned to the United States and labored to bring about a codification of its common law procedure- The codification, which was completed in February 1865, was adopted only in small part by the state of New York, but it served as a model upon which many statutory codes throughout the United States were
Fun Fact: At 8:10 what she wanted to say is that _The principles and practices which established the fundamentals of performance, public pageantry, the coercive subtleties of creating the consentual surrender of authority over oneself and his livelihoods, mastering and maintaining an openly and acceptably harmful double use of the common uses of a person's native language, establishing rules and compliance through perceptions and programs of entertainment, education, excessive enforcement and plausibly denying or posturing omniscient military superiority with a progressively empowered disregard for human decency and proficiency in maintaining societal unrest both domestically and internationally were initially taught in posh, carefully funded homeschools which were owned and operated by royal and noble elites, and eventually became more openly conducted as precursors to modern day "Law Schools." These treaturous institutions were initially called 'Inns of Court' because more appropriate titles such as 'Theatre School' and 'College of Arts' were resigned for respectable institutions which taught honorable skills and when to employ them._ Or, something like that.
See page. Common Law comes from the dome, a book of old rules and customs. Broken down they equate to 4 Laws only. No harm, loss, breach of peace, no deceit within contract. The Common Law cannot be changed by anyone as it is the foundation of the best justice system in the world. All it needs to work is for the ppl on a whole who make up the Common Law to take responsibility to uphold the Law. Out side of the Law, we have legislation, statutes, or acts, that would only have Lawful backing if consented to by the ppl after being made fully aware of the facts.
Common law can be changed by a simple judge via overruling or differentiation while civil law is more stable as the courts cannot completely change the intepretation of written regulations. It is therefore more accessible for the everyman who can just look up a law in one of the unified codes as well as search for precedents, which, although of no binding value, ought to be the same as long as the written regulation didn't change. It can also more easily adapt to changes, as the legislation isn't bound by precedents. And while the Doom books may be old, they aren't as old as the Code of Justinian from 534 CE, the oldest unified code and the basis for private continental law from the Middle Ages up to the present day or the Twelve Tables from 449 BCE, the oldest written civil law regulation.
we are forced civil now but can squeeze out of it .. i'm watching to see more and was she says .. try to common law courts i a suit . funny part we are common aw country but they do everything to stop it . criminals .
Read the Declaration of Independence, "freeman of the land crap" exists in the most powerful nation in the history of mankind. And only the common law is prescribed in our constitution, not the old world feudal roman law. "freeman" indeed with my choice of firearm, God bless America
The common law is common sense. It evolved through history in the same way that math evolved through history. You can be a highly competent mathematician without knowing anything about math history. Common law is a science and the word science was first used by Roman lawyers in describing the nature of jurisprudence.
Common law and civil law cannot blend. One protects private property and the government rules only with the governs consent. In the other, you are just a subject of the ruling class.
A flawed Analysis. The Mauritian Legal system is a very good example of combined civil and common law. And Common law also had aspects of the so called "ruling class"- the means of statutes. It is naive to dismiss all aspects of both the systems.
The only person on TH-cam that actually made sense
This was excellent- thank you very much.
I liked the explanation about the two law systems.
After having practiced law for several years, Field became convinced that the common law in America, and particularly in New York state, needed radical changes to unify and simplify its procedure. In 1836, he went to Europe to investigate the courts, procedure, and codes of England, France and other countries. He then returned to the United States and labored to bring about a codification of its common law procedure-
The codification, which was completed in February 1865, was adopted only in small part by the state of New York, but it served as a model upon which many statutory codes throughout the United States were
Fun Fact: At 8:10 what she wanted to say is that _The principles and practices which established the fundamentals of performance, public pageantry, the coercive subtleties of creating the consentual surrender of authority over oneself and his livelihoods, mastering and maintaining an openly and acceptably harmful double use of the common uses of a person's native language, establishing rules and compliance through perceptions and programs of entertainment, education, excessive enforcement and plausibly denying or posturing omniscient military superiority with a progressively empowered disregard for human decency and proficiency in maintaining societal unrest both domestically and internationally were initially taught in posh, carefully funded homeschools which were owned and operated by royal and noble elites, and eventually became more openly conducted as precursors to modern day "Law Schools." These treaturous institutions were initially called 'Inns of Court' because more appropriate titles such as 'Theatre School' and 'College of Arts' were resigned for respectable institutions which taught honorable skills and when to employ them._
Or, something like that.
👁
A splendid video and explanation
This was so great thank you!
See page. Common Law comes from the dome, a book of old rules and customs. Broken down they equate to 4 Laws only. No harm, loss, breach of peace, no deceit within contract. The Common Law cannot be changed by anyone as it is the foundation of the best justice system in the world. All it needs to work is for the ppl on a whole who make up the Common Law to take responsibility to uphold the Law. Out side of the Law, we have legislation, statutes, or acts, that would only have Lawful backing if consented to by the ppl after being made fully aware of the facts.
Well said and so true 👍
Common law can be changed by a simple judge via overruling or differentiation while civil law is more stable as the courts cannot completely change the intepretation of written regulations.
It is therefore more accessible for the everyman who can just look up a law in one of the unified codes as well as search for precedents, which, although of no binding value, ought to be the same as long as the written regulation didn't change.
It can also more easily adapt to changes, as the legislation isn't bound by precedents.
And while the Doom books may be old, they aren't as old as the Code of Justinian from 534 CE, the oldest unified code and the basis for private continental law from the Middle Ages up to the present day or the Twelve Tables from 449 BCE, the oldest written civil law regulation.
@@mikoajbaczynski3733 The Common Law cannot be changed.
Legislation can be, but only with the consent of the ppl it serves after being fully informed.
@@Tommykennedy101 So, if the 13th amendment hadn't been pased, would slavery still be legal?
@@mikoajbaczynski3733 The Common Law applies to ALL human beings.
Wonderful, thank you very much !
Thanks a lot maam for this content.
Great stuff!!
Thanks for your excellent explanation.
thank you very much
wow so moch info
Thanks a lot mam.
Please what are the citations
GOAT ......
Great lecture, one mistake, not to nitpick, but Ottawa is in Ontario, not Quebec, it's right on the border.
Law is the same all around 5 areas family prooerty successions contracts and persons civil law
Thanks. Although isn't university of Ottawa in Ontario?
Love your hairstyle! Excellent lecture, luved it
Martial law ~ Hold my Beer
Dude what the fuck this didn't explain anything, now I'm going to fail my exam lmao.
Roman law = civil lav, Canon law, common law , etc..
She's telling you about the merging of legal systems but not telling you how it ends up taking away your sovereignty and private property.
we are forced civil now but can squeeze out of it .. i'm watching to see more and was she says .. try to common law courts i a suit . funny part we are common aw country but they do everything to stop it . criminals .
The UK has no constitution!
Gerry Laarakker uk does. It's just not wholly written.
Lots of people on here have bought into "freeman of the land" crap. The legal equivalent of anti-vaxxers.
Read the Declaration of Independence, "freeman of the land crap" exists in the most powerful nation in the history of mankind. And only the common law is prescribed in our constitution, not the old world feudal roman law. "freeman" indeed with my choice of firearm, God bless America
uOttawa is not in Quebec... it's in Ontario.
please what historical events and processes shaped civil law tradition?
T 0:10
The common law is common sense. It evolved through history in the same way that math evolved through history. You can be a highly competent mathematician without knowing anything about math history. Common law is a science and the word science was first used by Roman lawyers in describing the nature of jurisprudence.
Spoken like a true believer
Many many questionable statements that oversimplify both systems, as which is the older system, that is very very much a moot point...
I wanted to know what the difference between civil and common law is. This video didn't tell me, so sorry, dislike cause it wasted my time
Common law and civil law cannot blend. One protects private property and the government rules only with the governs consent. In the other, you are just a subject of the ruling class.
Scotland has a blend of common and civil law.
A flawed Analysis. The Mauritian Legal system is a very good example of combined civil and common law. And Common law also had aspects of the so called "ruling class"- the means of statutes. It is naive to dismiss all aspects of both the systems.
the French Canada has blended system i.e. bijural system
There is no Muslim law: it is called Sharia law! Faites un effort, ma grande!
She forgot Talmudic law, but includes Sharia law. Hmmmm, I wonder why.
It's because Talmudic law doesn't look as impressive on a map