the countries around china couldnt fight against it.On the other hand if considering the Europe as one country like china ,there will be less battles,too.It's like if the England unified the Europe finally,then the won battles of Franch before will not be counted.
This is because we are small Countries that hate eachother. Now not. We are in peace... I think... Some Turkish boy invading Syria: "Time for a War". Europeans: "This is my work, asshole!"
Fun fact: At about 1250 BCE a little dot appears in the northeastern corner of Germany. That was the battle of the Tollense-valley. There aren’t any written records about it, but archeologists dug up a battlesite with incredibly high casualties for the time and place. This is the first large battle in Europe that we know of
Obviously, there were fewer wars in the world during the confrontation between the USSR and the USA. Parity has been established in the world. Global players were afraid to show aggression. After the collapse of the USSR, military conflicts engulfed the whole world. "The Red Threat", "bloody Stalin" is a lie. We see who really wants war. "The capitalist world", "freedom and democracy", "Western values" are a mask behind which wars and blood are hidden. In the near future, the war will cover many other countries, even where there has not been a war for a long time. And if everything is fine with you, then don't relax. The enemy of humanity has taken off his mask. Either humanity will win, or the parasitic class will win. Brothers unite.
@@черепахаестклубничкуyour thinking of a different event, the battle of teuotuburg forest, the one he is discribing the tollense battle was likely one of the largest battles of the Bronze Age
@@Jackson-id2nz nah, teutoburg forrest wasn't like caravan ambush in any scense. You should search for recent publications about Tollensey, where scientis came to conclusion that first assumptions was wrong
It's by far one of the worst ones I've seen, it basically says that, excluding Carthage and Egypt, there hasn't been a war or battle in any part of Africa until the 1800...
i agree, but since i learn Chinese History in Secondary, I wanna tell you what the real events is. in the Shang Dynasty (商朝), the last king is called Zhou, and the people really hated them so a nation called Zhou killed the king and made a Zhou Dynasty (周朝) In the Zhou Dynasty, the first king called Wu cut China into small pieces and called a lot of people to go and look after the lands, also putting the old Shang people in a smaller land 'Yin' so everyone can stop them if they try to go and ruin the government. Seems nice right? Actually not. After a few years, the government of the lands around Yin got persuaded by Yin and attacked the government, but it didn't succeed. Alright I wanna eat lunch bye
@Matheus Troan Far from the best, he was the best tactician of his time no doubt, but he was a lousy strategist, he had no clear goals for France to achieve. He practically won every battle, but lost the war. He's in good company, though, with Hannibal, and the US military in the same category
@Hornyshark No he became emperor after having become First Consul of France following a coup he orchestrated in 1799. He became popular in France near the end of the War of the First Coalition when he single-handedly kicked Austria out of the war when a triple attack was supposed to do so (the other two generals who were supposed to drop on the Austrians from the north while Napoleon did from the south were defeated but Napoleon who was leading the french army in Italy still succeeded in securing victory anyway which got France rid of the last threat.... Only Britain remained and their navy was a pain in the ass, their army alone was no big deal so France was no longer under threat of invasion, hence Napoleon's popularity). But by the time, Napoleon did all of that against the Austrians, the French had already conquered the low countries (the Netherlands included) and vast swathes of the HRE. Spain and Prussia were already out of the war by that point as well. Napoleon had nothing to do with any of that. There was only Austria and Britain left by that point. Most tellings of the the French Revolutionary Wars overly focus on the role Napoleon played in them due to his future role which leads to all other fronts (but the italian campaign as well the Siege of Toulon) not being talked about. And Napoleon spent most of the War of the Second Coalition in Egypt. Him coming back and successfully seizing power did help in that one though as the war wasn't going that great for the French up to that point.
Fun fact: the peace treaty between Rome and Carthage was signed in 1985. That treaty posed end to a war that "unofficially" was still going on from 2131 years.
@@pragueexpat5106 no, Rome is still today pretty mutch alive. It is now the capital of the Republic of Italy. While Carthage is just a small village in Tunisia.
"chartago delenda est" They sure did to the point there was no one left to even sign the surrender :O!!! It makes me so depressed seing how much time we as humans waste time, energy and ressources for conflict !!! And considering how fast the technology grew in a few decades after WWII; we would most likely have achieved interstellar travel by now if we didn't waste literally centuries listening to the whims of our political leaders about geo-political influece and territory !!! They should be put in a ring and fight over their differences themselves, but we're too stupid to let go of old grudges and they use it against us to do their bidding !
Not really, the hundred years war aside France was too much for England for most of the last 1000 years. Napoleon for example was not beaten by England but by a huge alliance of several empires and smaller states or vassals.
@@VivekKumar-rb7zk That's population density and although it is normal for population to be correlated with amount of battles Europe is ridiculously overepresented (Japan too actually.) Now we could pin it down to political fragmentation as a source of conflict (and it works really well for China and Japan), but then we look at India and the amount of battles is underwhelming for the population and political fragmentation (I'm convinced that most battles on the Indian subcontinent went unreported.)
@@meneither3834 Actually you are wrong. India indeed has seen many disastrous battle, but comparing it to Europe or China, it was very very peaceful. So much so, that it's the wars in most cases, the reason for the downfall of an empire, but in case of India, it was a volcanic explosion in modern day Indonesia in 6th century AD, which led to drastic change in seasons ultemately causing famines in India, which led to first deurbanisation of North India.
@@krishnkant9477 I can accept India being on average more peaceful than the other civilizations. But by that much ? Really ? I'm skeptical. Especially after reading how the brahmins purposefully erased wars from historical records.
Lol Europe, rather most, was fighting against weak states or weak civilizations, unlike Asia, which was fighting strong civilizations such as the islam, Mongol, China, and many others.
@@MOJAHED-XAN Most of eroupes battles happened on eroupe itself like Napoleon wars, world wars. Balanced wars all happens around eroupe, North Africa and Middle East. East Asia wasn't that balanced
@@MOJAHED-XANwhat are you talking about lil man ? 😂😂😂 The European powers conquered everything in the fucking world when they weren't busy fighting each other. China Australia the US México India Middle east all these places were colonies of UK or France or Spain. After Europeans started colonizing around 1500 nobody stopped them. Not a single country.
@@WarThomas46_Strategy Not really. The byzantine empire was the direct continuation of the roman empire, Italy was taken by the Lombards, divided into multiple different kingdoms and only after centuries they unified to form Italy.
my anthropology teachers said that archelogical evidence so far shows that Europe did have more battles but anthropology changes with new evidence so we'll see. i think europe has a lot of battles because its a peninsula not a continent. it has a lot of people in small spaces and the scarcity that creates leads to conflict. we've only been living in a post-famine time for a few decades now and as we can see the world is a lot more peaceful. except for the US anyway. edit: read william blum's 'America's Deadliest Export: Democracy' to understand how the usa distabilises nations in order to have an excuse to invade em
@@Itachi951000 I know France how easyly had beaten by Germany in second world war. I know how france come to Timur Imperids to get help from Timur, to stop Turkish.
700 years are a lot of time, and there was 1000 years more because Bizancio was Eastern Rome, they were know as ROMANS by they neighbourg and enemies not like Bizantins
Yeah, it took until the french revolution for rome (including byzantium) to get dropped down to the second spot of countries to win most battles in history.
Taylor Townsend it wasn’t a war anyway it was a big hunt and although they ‘lost’ at first they went back later with more men or something and shot thousands of them
Taylor Townsend probably replied to the wrong person but yeah being Australian this joke is the only thing you hear from foreigners apart from ‘your animals really must wanna kill you’ and ‘upside down haha funny’. These jokes were funny the first few times but it seems it’s the only thing people can come up with like ‘American fat haha’ and ‘Britain teeth bad haha’ so sometimes I just get pissed cause it’s the same joke over and over again. Sorry.
The Chinese record is missing a lot. During the Spring and Autumn Warring States Period, the 5th Sixteen Kingdoms Period, the 5th Ten Kingdoms Period, and the Mongols Period, there were no joke of fighting. But it's hardly checked
It's based on wikipedia articles, and there are waaaaaaaaaaaay more wikipedia contributors from the US and Europe compared to Asia. The whole thing is laughable.
Rome should be 7th. Dont understand why they don’t add byzantium’s victories on top of rome’s since it’s literally the eastern roman empire while for example they do count han and xia both as china or umayyad and rashudin both as the islamic caliphate
Can you think of any another empire that was the non-stop undisputed hegemon of the classical world (East Asia has different rules due to geography and China was broken several times to be reformed by a new dynasty) for a period of 600 years (from -200 to 400 roughly) ? Having a solid tradition of written history also helps to get a high score there, and the Romans did a fantastic job when it comes to that. It doesn't matter how many battles you win, if no one writes about them and they get forgotten when too old to be living memory.
@@diadokhoi5722 Yeah but franks kinda mixed itself with the galloic latin language aka french, so this tribe basically became half France half Germany in a oversimplified explanation.
S. S. Cookies right... the whole outside world before they traveled were all giving each other presents and flowers and wishing them a good day the next day. Absolutely.
@@jellyfishi_ The difference between Europe and the rest of the world is that Europe writes things down, you third worlders like to forget your crimes. Europe will always be the strongest, the greatest and at the envy of all the world. ROMA INVICTA!
@@khrisnafrrel funny you little bitches today germany is one of the most beatiful und most successful countrys in the world while yall americans are still stuck in the war between black and white
Remember who you are. You are descended from explorers, inventors, and conquerors. Never be ashamed of where you came from. Never let them lie to you. Never lose your smile.
English were king of the sea, and Napoléon was emperor of the continent. The elephant and the Whale. Obviously, it's easier when you live on an island. France is surrounded by europeans' nations/kingdoms.
Problem with maps like this is that without more info, it's just a heatmap of where people lived and who had good record keeping. I'm sure there were more unknown battles than known
@@-timothe- That's not always true. Besides if that's so than why didn't Vietnam, the winner of the Vietnam war, write how the Vietnam war played out from their perspective on the world stage and instead looked at it from the American prespective.
@@robbieaulia6462 bc that took place during modern times when information is easily documented and stored. 2000 years ago, only if your civilization was strong enough and had enough influence would your records survive - i.e., the winners
@@gildeddrake1479" Agreesive"lol just because he made France powerfull that make him agressive?And he conquered Europe because he had to defend France from the attack of all the other European Monarchies
@@historicalmaps3652 That is exactly what aggressive is in terms of war. Warmongering and ambitious. Napoleon didn't just want to defend against the monarchies of Europe, he wanted to expand. That is aggressive.
@@ElusiveTy It must be known that Napoleon had no intention of annoying anyone, and declared war on no one, he only defended himself. Well yes, after the revolution of 1789 the European monarchies were allied to attack France and restore the monarchy, Napoleon quickly took control of France and calmed them, before invading them one by one to show them who was the boss. It seems to me that it is only Portugal and Russia that he attacked voluntarily, one of which is that Russia had broken the alliance with France. I love Napoleon, but like any leader, he made mistakes, but to compare to the Nazis, no! He was a proud leader of his country and patriotic, who wanted to respect France around the world.He was considered a liberator especially by the Italians and the Poles so I do not think he was a dictator more he respected the conquered populations and that in any way he was defender so not responsible for the dead.
Craig Johnson you could also add all the victories of the byzantine empire to romes because they were technically the same empire. They have different names because the romans lost rome and their capital moved xD
Jack Denners The name change was actually due to an Italian historian trying to justify the Holy Roman Empire as the true successor. Everyone called them Romans while the empire existed.
@@SarudeDanstorm that's actually true, I'm surprised someone know the story ahahha The byzantine emperor actually called himself, emperor of the Roman, and the byzantine people considered themselves as Roman
@@goncerex9521 If you count the Byzantine Empire, which was in fact the Roman Empire living on another 1,000 years after the fall of Rome, it lasted for more than 2,000 years.
It really baffles me how many little dots are placed around the middle eastern and Indian regions during late 300 BC due to Alexander the greats conquest, absolutely amazing!
I know. Looks lame, by today's standards. Now we can kill ten times fold every year in ultra modern abortion clinics on most continents without even having to think about it. Pretty cool.
@@uriel1919V3 Funny thing is the US is like 235 years old. The Dutch had a 335 year old war (longest war in history and longest bloodless war in history). The more you know😂🤣
@Provocateur National Socialism came into existence almost 2000 years after Rome fell.. what logic are you using to refer to the Romans as Nazi's ? That makes no sense at all.
@@sergiomunoz6883 Who went to the moon? United States. Best planet in the galaxy, let's go. Has any other planet made it to the moon? Yeah I didn't think so.
@SVS They were only distinguished from the original Roman Empire after Constantinople fell, which is kinda ridiculous if you ask me. Constantinople was literally the capital of the Roman Empire long before the final division even occurred. The difference between England, France, and Spain's colonies is that the people in those colonies never did or ceased to refer to themselves by the identity of the mother country, where as the Byzantines always acknowledged themselves as Roman. Historians only distinguish the two of them based on religion, language, and culture. The Roman influence on the Byzantines and the institutions it created still were a massive part of the empire's identity. Funny how something that began as the Eastern Roman Empire and was referred to as such up until its death suddenly stopped being that as soon as other countries wanted to claim Roman succession.
@SVS Look, I'm not here to debate the validity of a 600 year old empire's name. But France is much different now than it was 1000 years ago and it's still called France with all the victories that come with it. This answer on Quora I found a while back sums up my views pretty well. www.quora.com/Were-the-Byzantines-actually-Roman Try and curb your toxicity when talking about useless factors such as the name of an empire that has no bearing on our current lives. Good day.
@@Paull19 في الغالب أغلب معاراك أمريك بدون قيمة عكس روسيا مثل له سجل حربي ضد ألمانيا فرنسا العثمانيين السويد و إيران بلاد فارس سابق حتى فرنسا له سجل حربي ضد بريطانيا ألمانيا إسبانيا النمسا ... في نظري تبقى بريطانيا و فرنسا و روسيا و ألمانيا هم أقوى الدول له سجل حربي في تاريخ ككل ولا يتفوق عليهم أحد
@@العمقالرياضي-ذ1ض makes sense all those countries have been around for hundreds and hundreds of years, the US track record though not as cool is still really insane with how young the country is compared to Europe.
@@العمقالرياضي-ذ1ض Americas battles have been some the most significant in history. WW2 without us would have been way more bloody lasted longer and been a slog. American revolution led to more countries declaring independence, popularization of enlightenment ideals, and creating the conditions in which Napolean would rise to power and he is not only one of the most influential people in history but we still use his organization of military forces today in almost every major military. And yes I understand he is French but it was the US revolution that created the conditions for his rise. Im not saying we are the most significant but to say worthless is wildly off base and untrue.
@Provocateur Lmao he always was in the front line and charging with is cavalery division at the enemy, how can you be a coward when you are a general that lead directly the offensive with your soldiers ?
It is not surprising that France is first. France is historically a country wedged between several great warrior countries (Italy, Spain, England, Germany). The French have always been at war with another country. They acquired a great military experience
DANIEL Lanyi bad excuse because France in the majority of wars was outnumbered because France during her history had to face coalitions !exept hundred years wars,WW1,WW2 . at 1214 Bouvines had to face germans English and flemmish !! Italian wars, it was against Germans! swiss spanish and italians (venise or milan ! ) its due to its central postion ;and during révolutions and napoleonic wars France, had to face almost all europeans nations of Seven coalitions !! and often this population account is biased because for example during hundred wars France' population was of 15 millions but it s included all the territory of modern France but normans ,Gascons,and Burgundians ,all the eastern France were vassals to king of France (like King of England) but they were enemies on the field in fact king of France could just rely on an smaller part than The English's French territory ! !! exept on the battle of Crecy or Azincourt!!! English ' army was half made up with gascons,Normans or burgundians!!
@@DidierDidier-kc4nm Do you think I don't know everything you've just told me in this pointless comment. What are you an expert now for knowing basic history. Yes France were outnumbered by those coalitions and I've never said that France only won those wars because it had a high population. However it was possible to win those wars only because it had a high population. The whole reason behind the formation of all those coalitions was that France was a monster at the time. At the time of the French Revolution they had the highest population with 22 million people. A modern country with that many people would be invincible if the other countries didn't form coalitions against them. Know what you're talking about.
@@owenosborne-lewis5060 yes, and all of them included Poles! They were fighting in Italian army as well as Bonaparte's army. There was 2 polish uprisings and 1 insurrection. Also they fought for Hungarian and USA, independance, American Civil War. They served in Austrian, Prussian and Russian army fighting against english, turks and Japanese, and so on, so on, you might be an nationalist, but u definitely r an ignorant...
most DOCUMENTED victories. After each roman victory, there would be an enormous propaganda about the battle, with specially minted coins circulating all across europe and inscriptions carved into solid stone. Stone and coins survived the last 2k years, so they get a wikipedia entry. Other empires, eg the mongols, just slaugthered their enemies and went on to slaughter some more, so we do not know anything about their skirmishes but only about their most important battles. The romans were good at winning battles, but they were even better at bragging about it.
@@blackpilledchad1927 The civilized winners write history, not every wimmer. If a Barbarian Mongolian wons a battle he did not write history or chronicles on it, since he's probably analphabet.
@@cowgfwolos9560 When Egyptians, persians, babylonians, medians, hurrians, sumerians, akkadians, were inventing literature, languages and alphabets, romans were still trying to eat rocks and wood
Maybe because Rome was the greatest "country" of all time. France sucks compared to Rome. Then it's funny how the barbarians (Germany and France) first fight versus Rome and then, when Rome was defeated, they did all to bring back to life the Roman Empire. If there was a petition to build again the Roman Empire, I would firm actually without doubts.
Crillin "Crili" You uh, going to write Rome a letter and when they don't reply drive your car into a river? This comment reads like you have their picture on your wall.
The fact that two arch nemesis Carthage & Rome both stayed on the list for over a millennia after their resp. demise goes to show how massive wars between those two were for the ancient world
Actually, that also inflates both of their numbers of wins, if Rome simply destroyed Carthage directly it would mean that Rome was way stronger but would have way fewer wins. Also, the punic wars happened around the same period than warring states period in China, the largest scale was during the 2nd punic war where both sides had more than 100 000 men while during the battle of Changping (which was only a military campaign and not a war) both sides had engaged around 500 000 men.
@@trollmcclure2659 that's mainly due to population if you look at percentage of men killed per population the punic wars really were like romes world War
Fun fact: almost every battle won by china was fought against another china
Fought
@@jacobarmour6325 heck u r right
the countries around china couldnt fight against it.On the other hand if considering the Europe as one country like china ,there will be less battles,too.It's like if the England unified the Europe finally,then the won battles of Franch before will not be counted.
@@aad2129 England has always done everything possible to prevent the unification of Europe
Like United States
Europe:
Peace was never an option
Peace ? I don't know this pokemon
This is because we are small Countries that hate eachother. Now not. We are in peace... I think...
Some Turkish boy invading Syria: "Time for a War".
Europeans: "This is my work, asshole!"
@@ErPuglia
Asia: *In a 3 side stand off*
Me: God damn it guys we have been doing this shit for 4000 years now!
Specifically, South europe
It's only because Europe was actually good at recording stuff. Lol
4:39 Napoleon joined the game
4:43 Napoleon was banned, accused of cheating
Mauvais joueur...
Yea he had high grade plasma guns that's y
Russia - moderator
Génius
I have many alt accounts
Fun fact: At about 1250 BCE a little dot appears in the northeastern corner of Germany. That was the battle of the Tollense-valley. There aren’t any written records about it, but archeologists dug up a battlesite with incredibly high casualties for the time and place. This is the first large battle in Europe that we know of
Foreshadowing
As curently known it wasnt actual buttle, more like caravan ambush
Obviously, there were fewer wars in the world during the confrontation between the USSR and the USA. Parity has been established in the world. Global players were afraid to show aggression. After the collapse of the USSR, military conflicts engulfed the whole world. "The Red Threat", "bloody Stalin" is a lie. We see who really wants war. "The capitalist world", "freedom and democracy", "Western values" are a mask behind which wars and blood are hidden. In the near future, the war will cover many other countries, even where there has not been a war for a long time. And if everything is fine with you, then don't relax. The enemy of humanity has taken off his mask. Either humanity will win, or the parasitic class will win. Brothers unite.
@@черепахаестклубничкуyour thinking of a different event, the battle of teuotuburg forest, the one he is discribing the tollense battle was likely one of the largest battles of the Bronze Age
@@Jackson-id2nz nah, teutoburg forrest wasn't like caravan ambush in any scense. You should search for recent publications about Tollensey, where scientis came to conclusion that first assumptions was wrong
Rome winning one more battle in the 1800s was like when a character returns to a sitcom as a guest
Its like when rocky comes back to the ring at 60 years old to fight again
Wait how did Rome fight one more battle
@@apassionatepotato idk but im guessing vatican
@@apassionatepotato en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Republic_(1849)
The Roman Republic came back into existence in 1849. Rome fell under a French siege.
@@Koopinator today I learned, that the Roman Republic came back very briefly
The Fact that Rome stayed on this list a millenium after their collapse is insane.
that's because the video only shows recorded battles
@@andre1954 Of course if it's not recorded how do we mark it down??
@@dantesparda7719 what becomes obvious? nothing about your comment makes any sense
@@dantesparda7719 not really kid
@@dantesparda7719 What?
WW1: "That's a lot of damage"
WW2: "How about a little more"
But it’s okay, flex seal can fix ANYTHING!
*I SAWED THE COUNTRY IN HALF*
WW2 : its rewind time
WW3: *_I'm boutta terrorize all the wars_*
yoongi_infires_my_ass Iron Curtain: *I SAWED THE CONTINENT IN HALF*
Remember, these are RECORDED battles. The map is likely a lot worse.
Especially in the western hemisphere.
@@DrHrishikeshApteBro's Born during BC💀
@@YourLocalPlushAddictbros family has its own armies
Damm he really Deleted his replies...we weren't even roasting him🗿
It's by far one of the worst ones I've seen, it basically says that, excluding Carthage and Egypt, there hasn't been a war or battle in any part of Africa until the 1800...
When China wins a battle against China and gets credited for a battle won: "I see this as an absolute win"
Your profile pic is cursed
^^
Wathefock is that picture of you
i agree, but since i learn Chinese History in Secondary, I wanna tell you what the real events is.
in the Shang Dynasty (商朝), the last king is called Zhou, and the people really hated them so a nation called Zhou killed the king and made a Zhou Dynasty (周朝)
In the Zhou Dynasty, the first king called Wu cut China into small pieces and called a lot of people to go and look after the lands, also putting the old Shang people in a smaller land 'Yin' so everyone can stop them if they try to go and ruin the government. Seems nice right? Actually not. After a few years, the government of the lands around Yin got persuaded by Yin and attacked the government, but it didn't succeed.
Alright I wanna eat lunch bye
Ur profile pic.......
Notice how they didn’t show Antarctica, those penguins have been fighting each other in battles since the beginning
Ikr, so racist, get ready for tweets
They’re currently in a Cold War
@@FartBiter good joke
@@FartBiter 😂😂😂
ㅋㅋ 그것은 정말 재미있습니다
NAPOLEONIC BOOST
France 1779: 368
France 1815: 776
@Matheus Troan Far from the best, he was the best tactician of his time no doubt, but he was a lousy strategist, he had no clear goals for France to achieve. He practically won every battle, but lost the war. He's in good company, though, with Hannibal, and the US military in the same category
@@rrdgz5355 he won five wars, he lost two
France 1792: 382
France 1815: 776
Revolutionary boost first before the Napoleonic one lol. Eveyone just forget the French Revolutionary Wars.
@Hornyshark No he became emperor after having become First Consul of France following a coup he orchestrated in 1799. He became popular in France near the end of the War of the First Coalition when he single-handedly kicked Austria out of the war when a triple attack was supposed to do so (the other two generals who were supposed to drop on the Austrians from the north while Napoleon did from the south were defeated but Napoleon who was leading the french army in Italy still succeeded in securing victory anyway which got France rid of the last threat.... Only Britain remained and their navy was a pain in the ass, their army alone was no big deal so France was no longer under threat of invasion, hence Napoleon's popularity). But by the time, Napoleon did all of that against the Austrians, the French had already conquered the low countries (the Netherlands included) and vast swathes of the HRE. Spain and Prussia were already out of the war by that point as well. Napoleon had nothing to do with any of that. There was only Austria and Britain left by that point. Most tellings of the the French Revolutionary Wars overly focus on the role Napoleon played in them due to his future role which leads to all other fronts (but the italian campaign as well the Siege of Toulon) not being talked about.
And Napoleon spent most of the War of the Second Coalition in Egypt. Him coming back and successfully seizing power did help in that one though as the war wasn't going that great for the French up to that point.
Fun fact: the peace treaty between Rome and Carthage was signed in 1985.
That treaty posed end to a war that "unofficially" was still going on from 2131 years.
What?, neither Rome nor Carthage exists anymore..
@@pragueexpat5106 no, Rome is still today pretty mutch alive. It is now the capital of the Republic of Italy.
While Carthage is just a small village in Tunisia.
Some guy searching throught the town Hall archives discovering they have been at wat for the past 2000 years: what the fuck?
@@matheusexpedito4577 yeap.
"chartago delenda est"
They sure did to the point there was no one left to even sign the surrender :O!!! It makes me so depressed seing how much time we as humans waste time, energy and ressources for conflict !!!
And considering how fast the technology grew in a few decades after WWII; we would most likely have achieved interstellar travel by now if we didn't waste literally centuries listening to the whims of our political leaders about geo-political influece and territory !!!
They should be put in a ring and fight over their differences themselves, but we're too stupid to let go of old grudges and they use it against us to do their bidding !
Fun fact: That one single dot in western Australia was the
*E m u w a r*
which i believe was at least a draw for the Emu's :)
I love u stalin👁👄👁
After that Australians lost the willing to fight on their own soil
Да
Imagine losing to a flightless bird LOL
4:48 America had the right idea to get more battle wins by going to war with itself.
This is gold haha.
Balake Ohh can’t lose battle in war, if your fighting yourself in war.
When you boost your main using your alt account.
Loool
Just like france with the french wars of religion
More than 70 years of peace in western Europe is a miracle indeed.....
Nukes and Ballistic missiles are the only reason
Yes, but remember permanent peace is nothing. They need to prepare future wars.
not much time of peace left in Europe, is just a matter of time
Capitalism!
Things will change soon...
Damn no wonder France and England have be fighting eachother for a 1000 years, apparently they’re so evenly matched they just kept farming eachother
Poland , Austria and Sweden there too
And FIFA, Olympics is french too
Not really, the hundred years war aside France was too much for England for most of the last 1000 years. Napoleon for example was not beaten by England but by a huge alliance of several empires and smaller states or vassals.
France and Germany fought a lot more
I love how Rome is #8 on this list but it hasn’t existed for almost a thousand years
They’re only counting western Roman Empire which hasn’t existed for 1,544 years.
Cries Byzantine tears.
I think they fell in 493
The eastern Romans or the byzantines fell in 1453
@@darrenhagzid2015 476
is it good ?
This says more about how well were battles recorded than how many there were.
I think it shows innovation map and fertile ground navigable rivers oceans coasts etc where humanity can take place
@@VivekKumar-rb7zk That's population density and although it is normal for population to be correlated with amount of battles Europe is ridiculously overepresented (Japan too actually.)
Now we could pin it down to political fragmentation as a source of conflict (and it works really well for China and Japan), but then we look at India and the amount of battles is underwhelming for the population and political fragmentation (I'm convinced that most battles on the Indian subcontinent went unreported.)
@@meneither3834 Actually you are wrong.
India indeed has seen many disastrous battle, but comparing it to Europe or China, it was very very peaceful.
So much so, that it's the wars in most cases, the reason for the downfall of an empire, but in case of India, it was a volcanic explosion in modern day Indonesia in 6th century AD, which led to drastic change in seasons ultemately causing famines in India, which led to first deurbanisation of North India.
@@meneither3834 I think so too
@@krishnkant9477 I can accept India being on average more peaceful than the other civilizations. But by that much ? Really ? I'm skeptical. Especially after reading how the brahmins purposefully erased wars from historical records.
Asia : I am the biggest continent
Europe : I am the battlefield
Haha, when you technically live in both
Lol
Europe, rather most, was fighting against weak states or weak civilizations, unlike Asia, which was fighting strong civilizations such as the islam, Mongol, China, and many others.
@@MOJAHED-XAN Most of eroupes battles happened on eroupe itself like Napoleon wars, world wars. Balanced wars all happens around eroupe, North Africa and Middle East. East Asia wasn't that balanced
@@MOJAHED-XANwhat are you talking about lil man ? 😂😂😂 The European powers conquered everything in the fucking world when they weren't busy fighting each other. China Australia the US México India Middle east all these places were colonies of UK or France or Spain. After Europeans started colonizing around 1500 nobody stopped them. Not a single country.
Africa bigger than Asia(and, yes,there is not a country).
Rome existing in the list till the end of the video is insane
And it would be in the 6th position if it was counted properly (eastern Rome).
well also rome probably has so many more wins bc they prob only recorded their wins
@@Pepe-pq3omto count it properly it should count also italy victories
@@WarThomas46_Strategy Not really. The byzantine empire was the direct continuation of the roman empire, Italy was taken by the Lombards, divided into multiple different kingdoms and only after centuries they unified to form Italy.
@@Pepe-pq3om i know the history of italy, i am italian myself. I still think that it should count
Rest of the World : violence is never answer
Europe: I agree! violence is the question, and the answer is yes!!!
lol i love that one
Hey Alizwa, if you like history please consider checking out my timeline of the 150+ most important people in history :)
1000 years later it’s the other way around.
@@glacierlegion9439 Europe is still violent and its still hardly under containment
@@grievetan Only slavic europe.
Imagine all the battles lost to time/never recorded, the list truly would be near endless.
Well about maybe 3x more than this depending what you count as a battle
@@whwhwhhwhhhwhdldkjdsnsjsks6544 does lawsuits count lol
@@billylauwda9178 legal battles 😳
my anthropology teachers said that archelogical evidence so far shows that Europe did have more battles but anthropology changes with new evidence so we'll see.
i think europe has a lot of battles because its a peninsula not a continent. it has a lot of people in small spaces and the scarcity that creates leads to conflict. we've only been living in a post-famine time for a few decades now and as we can see the world is a lot more peaceful. except for the US anyway.
edit: read william blum's 'America's Deadliest Export: Democracy' to understand how the usa distabilises nations in order to have an excuse to invade em
The americas before Conquistadors
1790’s to 1810’s:
Napoleon: allow me to introduce myself
;)
I am Chinese and I have to say almost Chinese people adore Napoleon
Napoleon: - Allow me introduce myself!
Russia's cold weather: - Take my beer!
@@clashking_uz Nah the Russians got thrashed in 3 wars before pulling that bullshit uno reverse card on the French when the latter invaded Russia lol.
@@Itachi951000 I know France how easyly had beaten by Germany in second world war. I know how france come to Timur Imperids to get help from Timur, to stop Turkish.
The fact that both world wars are passing super fast with no weight is very terrifying
A testament to how powerful Rome was in its time, 2000 years later and still in the top 10.
700 years are a lot of time, and there was 1000 years more because Bizancio was Eastern Rome, they were know as ROMANS by they neighbourg and enemies not like Bizantins
Yeah, it took until the french revolution for rome (including byzantium) to get dropped down to the second spot of countries to win most battles in history.
The Catholics have a lot to answer for in history
Not powerful just crook lol
@@eugenaakatruth-seeker1174 Near 1000 Wéstern Europe was completed Catholic , that a lot of history
Romans are nearly 2000 years old and still haven’t fallen off the top 10 on the leaderboard. What a legendary empire
yeah true
*more than 2000 years old.
@@goatruso3198 i am confused how old is it ?
Ok then i was wrong
@@user-mq1uo6op4n nope! OE was just the last nail in the coffin
They didn't even include the one where Australia lost to some birds...
knight ni is this a racist joke
And the conquest of America
Taylor Townsend yea ik
Taylor Townsend it wasn’t a war anyway it was a big hunt and although they ‘lost’ at first they went back later with more men or something and shot thousands of them
Taylor Townsend probably replied to the wrong person but yeah being Australian this joke is the only thing you hear from foreigners apart from ‘your animals really must wanna kill you’ and ‘upside down haha funny’. These jokes were funny the first few times but it seems it’s the only thing people can come up with like ‘American fat haha’ and ‘Britain teeth bad haha’ so sometimes I just get pissed cause it’s the same joke over and over again. Sorry.
The Chinese record is missing a lot. During the Spring and Autumn Warring States Period, the 5th Sixteen Kingdoms Period, the 5th Ten Kingdoms Period, and the Mongols Period, there were no joke of fighting. But it's hardly checked
That and tbf the method used was Wikipedia, its hardly the best source ever, but it does provide a large quantity at least
It's based on wikipedia articles, and there are waaaaaaaaaaaay more wikipedia contributors from the US and Europe compared to Asia. The whole thing is laughable.
我希望这是真的，不希望有战争是每个人类的愿景！
Props to that guy who waited 4500 years to make a 5 minute video.
Props like props from react library? What about state?
man stfu with these bull sh t comments.
literally unfunny af 💀💀
@@vitaliinnest props is a way to say great job.
@@griffithwes0074 what do u think about Angular? Is it better than React?
@@griffithwes0074 maybe you’re a backend developer?
Australia has entered the game
Australia has left the game
Those damm emus
*australia has entered the server*
*emu has entered the server*
*australia has left the server*
Australia is the best shut up maybe ur germany
Connor RK800 it’s German not Germany. BOI
In Australia the battles are every day but against animals
To be fair, this is of every recorded battle. We may never know of all the battles fought between African tribes or in the Americas prior to Columbus.
You are missing the point wars are between army but tribe fighting is like skool fight casualties and impact wise
@@moeahmed4582 There have been African tribal wars that involved tens of thousands.
Even of India prior to 700 AD
True :/ although I also believe that many asian countries are also underrepresented
Recorded history is not covered all by Wikipedia
In my country Wikipedia is not the most common platform which we share knowledge and information.
Funny how the Crusaders, a military expedition, managed to make it at the list at *3:25* which illustrates how brutal the crusades was.
necessary
This has nothing to do with brutality but with battles won, stay on topic.
I'm leaving to Canada for the next 4000 years
Sheshounet noyé dans les milliers de coms
Tu auré un comte psn, comme sa on poura jouais a fortnite en-semble 🤗😎😔😏
Je vais aller en Australie pour ma part, je ne compte que 2 points blancs !
Sheshounet :D
Salut toi :D
The fact that Poland went off the map so many times yet is still in top 10 is impressive. That’s the spirit
@Nakix gratuluję, jesteś zajebisty
"I am a Pole!" said the destroyer that charged the German Battleship Bismarck. The Poles have crazy courage. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORP_Piorun_(G65)
Winged hussars arrived
They’ve been invaded so many times, it’s no wonder they have so many battles won 😂
@@TraXtor_ что ещё расскажешь, урус?
The Romans still had the most victories in 1700, 1200 years after their fall.
Even today, Rome is 8th in how many battles they won.
Danymok dude you make such good videos
Rome should be 7th. Dont understand why they don’t add byzantium’s victories on top of rome’s since it’s literally the eastern roman empire while for example they do count han and xia both as china or umayyad and rashudin both as the islamic caliphate
@@jellyfishi_ Long live Rome, long live the Empire.
@@apparentlyjeremy Historically illiterate.
Rome could be higher, we have probably lost many battles. Impossible to compare modern countries et antiques ones.
-Kill the opponent
=Why would i ?
-i don't know stop asking me weird question and load your gun
How many wars you got?
Europe: *yes*
Europe : *allow me to introduce myself*
China: *_Heh, amateurs._*
Guess what. Africa, Russia and America certainly had plenty of battles too. They just weren't developed enough to write them down.
@@edeliteedelite1961 well thats there problem
innovation matters
🇪🇸 Acoustic guitar
🏴 Magnifying glass, computer,ATM, spinning jenny, motor, vaccines, cricket, cement,
🇨🇿Contact lenses, propellor, Bata shoes
🇮🇹Eye glasses, espresso machine,violin, piano, cello, radio
🏴 Capitalism, refrigerator, television
🇸🇪 Minecraft ,zipper,Volvo,dynamite Nobel prize,spotify,celcius thermometer
🇺🇦 Helicopter
🇳🇱 Pendulum clock, world map, telescope
🇩🇪 Globe, watch, printing press, x ray, video games, car
🇬🇷 Democracy, theatre, Olympics,
🇭🇺Ball point pen, safety match, Rubik's cube etc
@@edeliteedelite1961
note that rome is still in the top 10 since 3000 years... and was the first until 1700
Can you think of any another empire that was the non-stop undisputed hegemon of the classical world (East Asia has different rules due to geography and China was broken several times to be reformed by a new dynasty) for a period of 600 years (from -200 to 400 roughly) ?
Having a solid tradition of written history also helps to get a high score there, and the Romans did a fantastic job when it comes to that. It doesn't matter how many battles you win, if no one writes about them and they get forgotten when too old to be living memory.
They also won one at 1849 somehow
They probably counted Italy as Rome for some reason
@@jandcgaming1515 no!
Italy counted as italy since the union in 1861
Rome counted as rome from 753 bc to 476 ac.
I am so much proud of it
how world wars started
ww1: bullets and a driver
ww2: weird mustache man failed art school lost mom and country lost in ww1
ww3: territory snatching
WW1 really started with the Balkan wars
Hopefully it's not over religion
@@Pepe-pq3om🇦🇹🥂
Every WORLD war, including 3 if it happens, has been joos bc they can't do anything on their own. They have to drag everyone else with them.
Roman empire: fall
France: Allow me to introduce myself
@@إلياس-ل9ظ well France did won a lots of battle before and after Napoleon, not like you can see it on the video
*franks, basically a mix of French and German who spoke Latin (at least it was the official language of the Frankish kingdom)
@@إلياس-ل9ظ its a bit retarded assuming rome has existed for at least 800 years and assum8ng it has only won 258 battles
@@frwt.0432 franks were a german tribe. So are saxons normans slavs goths visigoths. In fact id say all of northern europe is german.
@@diadokhoi5722 Yeah but franks kinda mixed itself with the galloic latin language aka french, so this tribe basically became half France half Germany in a oversimplified explanation.
Peace: Exists
Europe: We don’t do that here.
Kl
S. S. Cookies right... the whole outside world before they traveled were all giving each other presents and flowers and wishing them a good day the next day. Absolutely.
@@jellyfishi_ The difference between Europe and the rest of the world is that Europe writes things down, you third worlders like to forget your crimes. Europe will always be the strongest, the greatest and at the envy of all the world. ROMA INVICTA!
Atomic bombs: Yes, you do
@ As if your opinion had any relevance at all hahaha.
4:39 *napoleon joined the server*
Lol
4:58 **Nazi Join The Server**
Dang those Nazi Using Hax
@@khrisnafrrel funny you little bitches today germany is one of the most beatiful und most successful countrys in the world while yall americans are still stuck in the war between black and white
@@user-pw5rp4qt1o umm.... no one is calling Germany ugly.
Remember who you are. You are descended from explorers, inventors, and conquerors.
Never be ashamed of where you came from. Never let them lie to you. Never lose your smile.
Rome falling be like :
*SUFFERING FROM SUCCESS*
Lmao
Lol
Han is the same
I wonder what Rome would be like right now if the Black Plague never happened. Would the Roman empire still be strong? 🤔
@@blissful5361 Black Plague-roman empire? What? Maybe you're referring to the Antonian Plague
Rome: i rule the world
years later
Napoleon: Hi
Catolics kings have join
Napoleon:”I rule the world”
Years later
Britain: “I’m about to end this whole mans career”
France surpassed Rome's battle wins in the early 1700's so almost a century before Napoleon.
Britain :
I rule the world!!
USA:
Surprise motherfu...
China:
Hi
English were king of the sea, and Napoléon was emperor of the continent. The elephant and the Whale. Obviously, it's easier when you live on an island. France is surrounded by europeans' nations/kingdoms.
Problem with maps like this is that without more info, it's just a heatmap of where people lived and who had good record keeping. I'm sure there were more unknown battles than known
Winners write history. No history, no winning. That's the rule
There is probably a pretty strong correlation between where people live and where battles occur, though.
@@nielsunnerup7099 that's kind my point
@@-timothe- That's not always true. Besides if that's so than why didn't Vietnam, the winner of the Vietnam war, write how the Vietnam war played out from their perspective on the world stage and instead looked at it from the American prespective.
@@robbieaulia6462 bc that took place during modern times when information is easily documented and stored. 2000 years ago, only if your civilization was strong enough and had enough influence would your records survive - i.e., the winners
Europe just can't stop fighting
French Revolution: *happens*
France: *”battles won” intensifies*
well Napoleon is definitely up there in the list of the most aggressive people on history.
@@gildeddrake1479" Agreesive"lol just because he made France powerfull that make him agressive?And he conquered Europe because he had to defend France from the attack of all the other European Monarchies
@@historicalmaps3652 That is exactly what aggressive is in terms of war. Warmongering and ambitious. Napoleon didn't just want to defend against the monarchies of Europe, he wanted to expand. That is aggressive.
@@ElusiveTy It must be known that Napoleon had no intention of annoying anyone, and declared war on no one, he only defended himself. Well yes, after the revolution of 1789 the European monarchies were allied to attack France and restore the monarchy, Napoleon quickly took control of France and calmed them, before invading them one by one to show them who was the boss. It seems to me that it is only Portugal and Russia that he attacked voluntarily, one of which is that Russia had broken the alliance with France.
I love Napoleon, but like any leader, he made mistakes, but to compare to the Nazis, no! He was a proud leader of his country and patriotic, who wanted to respect France around the world.He was considered a liberator especially by the Italians and the Poles so I do not think he was a dictator more he respected the conquered populations and that in any way he was defender so not responsible for the dead.
Historical maps Napolitano was very aggressive and ambitious but worse he through away many of his countrymen s lives in the process
No one:
Europeans: *DO YOU WANT TO EXPLODE??*
Europe is Ready to Brawl!
Oh shit :[
polska is too Ready to brawl
ODST 177
Jajaja, bru
Yo tb soy de España :)
The fact that the Roman Empire is still in the list tells you how bad ass the Romans attitude towards war was
Craig Johnson you could also add all the victories of the byzantine empire to romes because they were technically the same empire. They have different names because the romans lost rome and their capital moved xD
Also they were there for 1000 years... Also there are lots if battles missed
Jack Denners The name change was actually due to an Italian historian trying to justify the Holy Roman Empire as the true successor. Everyone called them Romans while the empire existed.
@@SarudeDanstorm that's actually true, I'm surprised someone know the story ahahha
The byzantine emperor actually called himself, emperor of the Roman, and the byzantine people considered themselves as Roman
@@goncerex9521 If you count the Byzantine Empire, which was in fact the Roman Empire living on another 1,000 years after the fall of Rome, it lasted for more than 2,000 years.
It really baffles me how many little dots are placed around the middle eastern and Indian regions during late 300 BC due to Alexander the greats conquest, absolutely amazing!
You realize how immense this timeline is when you see WW1 and WW2 as 2 second blips on the map.
But Europe was lit af
@@el_benja the moment u realize most history and most important was in Europe
@@KadraNk16 they just don’t know anything about other parts. Africa, India, South East Asia, almost nothing happened there, which is not true at all.
@@KadraNk16 nah they just documented stuff in Europe, shit was happening all over the world just nobody knew about it
@@KadraNk16 Racist much?
*When you think that every dot represents thousands of people who died on the battlefield...*
Vladszack Gaming1v1 millions
vladszack hi i saw u in ''Countries with highest tax rates" how did u get there bro
@@ihatetheantichrist500 he got here just like u did
@Brylle Cruz hey!not everyone died in a war
I know. Looks lame, by today's standards.
Now we can kill ten times fold every year in ultra modern abortion clinics on most continents without even having to think about it.
Pretty cool.
Europe has been through some shit
@Shitty Mem's The church give free education and doctors ...
The US then not even 300 years old and coming in the top 3.
'MERICA💪😂🤣
Now you know why there is the eu!
TrueGreenSmoker PvP lmao hasn’t even been around for 400 years like the others and already pass half of them 💀💀😂
@@uriel1919V3 Funny thing is the US is like 235 years old. The Dutch had a 335 year old war (longest war in history and longest bloodless war in history). The more you know😂🤣
4500 years of battle in the world with lighting dot.
Europ : let me enlight you
Europe: *exists*
Europeans: *We are about to end this land's whole career*
But im not a rapper
You mean
*Whole existence*
delete Germans and Russians and Europe will be quit peaceful continent
@@velox81 France was the country, which started most of the battles. Germany started one world war but not many other battles
velox81 mate you what, British and France have the most battles.
nobody:
not a single living soul:
europe: *lets fight for some reason guys*
France: *come here little kids*
@@therenx8385 And then France got raped
@@odst1778 a few world wars later
France: *please stop*
Just a bit oversimplified but ok
Yeah, i guess it is in our blood. We like to fight, we like to compete and push each other to new levels and improve.
When France has won the most battles in world history but gets made fun of for surrendering
**logic**
Bruh I have to keep telling you frenchies that the u.s is far younger than France but it almost caught up with france.
Recorded battles* But yes you're right
France lost big battles like trying to invade Russia (napoleon) and surrendering in WW2
You know... N B is right.
5:06 the people fighting in the USA: 🗿
Yeah the us went up the board so fast
Russia 1945💀
2017 and Rome is still on the list, damn son.
Provocateur ??
His name is his motto
That's how an empire becomes the greatest the world's ever seen
Pseudonym
How about china? Been in the list since the first seconds of the video
@Provocateur National Socialism came into existence almost 2000 years after Rome fell.. what logic are you using to refer to the Romans as Nazi's ? That makes no sense at all.
France: *has most battle wins*
Everyone else: I'm gonna pretend I didn't see that
France: surrenders to Germany
Everyone else: hehe you suck
@Yyyy U gay Everyone else doesn't necessarily mean he was only talking about Americans.
@Yyyy U gay u know that USA is not the only country in the world?
TescoOnRoblox France has also been around longer than most of the countries on the list in the end
@@sergiomunoz6883 Who went to the moon? United States. Best planet in the galaxy, let's go. Has any other planet made it to the moon? Yeah I didn't think so.
@@Tinfoil_Hardhatso? Who cares about that
World:
“How many battles do you want?”
Europe:
“Yes”
How many battles so you wanna have recorded?*
Europe: yes.
And people call Afghanistan the graveyard of empire. Looks like even Korea and Japan have more recorded battles than in the Afghanistan region.
More than likely jist biased because wikipedia is contributed heavily by Europeans and european-descended Americans.
@@barley12girl not really, Afghanistan was dubbed that because that's where empires meet up with other empires and destroys each other.
@@maaan8494 doesn't change the fact that Europe fought way more war than any continent
Well done.
"The most common sound throughout the history of man is the beating of the war drum"
China: _fights other China_
China: I won!
China: You won?
China: No, I won
Side China: Who is Who
China: I'm China
China: I'm the other China
Ppls rep. Vs taiwan bit older
Starts another war with China
With China Armenia was the first
Lol
Tiwan?
In 1700: Rome still first in number of victories
In 2017: Rome is still between the best 10
ROMA AETERNA!
And that's without counting all of the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) victories.
@nem ligo '-' Exactly ahahaha
@@storiesthroughnumbers4111 That's true wow
@SVS They were only distinguished from the original Roman Empire after Constantinople fell, which is kinda ridiculous if you ask me. Constantinople was literally the capital of the Roman Empire long before the final division even occurred. The difference between England, France, and Spain's colonies is that the people in those colonies never did or ceased to refer to themselves by the identity of the mother country, where as the Byzantines always acknowledged themselves as Roman.
Historians only distinguish the two of them based on religion, language, and culture. The Roman influence on the Byzantines and the institutions it created still were a massive part of the empire's identity.
Funny how something that began as the Eastern Roman Empire and was referred to as such up until its death suddenly stopped being that as soon as other countries wanted to claim Roman succession.
@SVS Look, I'm not here to debate the validity of a 600 year old empire's name. But France is much different now than it was 1000 years ago and it's still called France with all the victories that come with it. This answer on Quora I found a while back sums up my views pretty well.
www.quora.com/Were-the-Byzantines-actually-Roman
Try and curb your toxicity when talking about useless factors such as the name of an empire that has no bearing on our current lives. Good day.
France: *Wins the most battles*
5th graders with access to the internet: Unfortunately for you, history will not see it that way.
Bruh this was me in 5th grade
china won the most battles in history by far its just not documented
If it is not documented that means it might not be confirmed that the battle actually happened
@@rexdaylawn1609 no shit
@@akjdhajkdjhaghjkadh9804 bruh 3/4 of their battles were against themselves
1 year of Russian war with Germany/Napoleon = 150 battles won
Something doesn’t match here 🤔 😂
Russia didn't win many battles against France alone. It was mostly the nature
@@Paull19 في الغالب أغلب معاراك أمريك بدون قيمة عكس روسيا مثل له سجل حربي ضد ألمانيا فرنسا العثمانيين السويد و إيران بلاد فارس سابق
حتى فرنسا له سجل حربي ضد بريطانيا ألمانيا إسبانيا النمسا ...
في نظري تبقى بريطانيا و فرنسا و روسيا و ألمانيا هم أقوى الدول له سجل حربي في تاريخ ككل ولا يتفوق عليهم أحد
❤
@@العمقالرياضي-ذ1ض makes sense all those countries have been around for hundreds and hundreds of years, the US track record though not as cool is still really insane with how young the country is compared to Europe.
@@العمقالرياضي-ذ1ض Americas battles have been some the most significant in history. WW2 without us would have been way more bloody lasted longer and been a slog. American revolution led to more countries declaring independence, popularization of enlightenment ideals, and creating the conditions in which Napolean would rise to power and he is not only one of the most influential people in history but we still use his organization of military forces today in almost every major military. And yes I understand he is French but it was the US revolution that created the conditions for his rise. Im not saying we are the most significant but to say worthless is wildly off base and untrue.
Fact: Napoléon led 51 battles, he won 44 of them.
Victory ratio: 86%
He truly was a legend.
He représente 10% french victories gg
@Provocateur Lmao he always was in the front line and charging with is cavalery division at the enemy, how can you be a coward when you are a general that lead directly the offensive with your soldiers ?
@@spartame450 less than 20 years in a country that lasted 16 centuries (1/80= >2%) of France
A legend who killed hundred thousands of people to fulfill his ego. This guy really sounds like a legend...
Alexander the great lost one battle..
The Virgin Russo-American rivalry
vs the Chad Franco-England rivalry
@@nedsteven4622 My god you are so boring
@@foxxer4352 I think you're in the wrong place then
@@Reximus. ?
Now France and England are just like:
Friends?
Friends.
Except when the World Cup
Enemies
China & Mongolia have been on & off at war since 3000 BC. Egypt & Israel have as well.
Europe: what's that?
Middle east: oh, this? This is war.
Europe: oooh, I want it!
Stereotypes at its finest.
Forgot to laugh
as an Arab this totally happened
@@Bananaman-hk6qw That's true
@Your Majesty, not exactly.
What is the battle in northern Germany? 0:27
Ur mom vs dad battle best battle
@@Ahmetefesevimbruh
Its Tollense valley battlefield
Thanks!! :>
Nice the fact Rome still in 8th position in 2017 lol
Still my favorite Empire of all time!
Rome should've been later combined with the wider Italy on the map video.
@@rainluna9765 Don't compare glouriosity with shit please.
In 1922 my country Poland It's better then Rome.
@@mariankowalski5119 well yes, but actually no
"Violence is not a solution
It's THE solution"
- A French TH-camr
😂😂😂
@@RaviSingh-zb8pi wow, it's nice to see a person with the same second name
Especially when it's the rarest second name in the world 😀
@@mrmistery102 wttt 😂😂😂😂 in India the second name is common bro you can Google but I have never seen Mike with Singh it's really cool 😍😍😍
Who said it?
Y’en a qui ont des bonnes refs ici ;)
Game of thrones: look at all our political drama and war
Me a European: this looks familiar
"I am European" nobody ever said.
Seems logic.
@@Mornepin today people say that because europe is kinda more connected
@@Bruh-hq1hx Where do you live ?
@@Mornepindepending on your viewpoint a central eurpean or west European country
@@Bruh-hq1hx which one ?
Fun fact this is missing one battle from 2023 me against my toilet last night
It is not surprising that France is first.
France is historically a country wedged between several great warrior countries (Italy, Spain, England, Germany).
The French have always been at war with another country.
They acquired a great military experience
They also had the highest population in Europe for a long time which also explains a lot.
DANIEL Lanyi bad excuse because France in the majority of wars was outnumbered because France during her history had to face coalitions !exept hundred years wars,WW1,WW2 . at 1214 Bouvines had to face germans English and flemmish !! Italian wars, it was against Germans! swiss spanish and italians (venise or milan ! ) its due to its central postion ;and during révolutions and napoleonic wars France, had to face almost all europeans nations of Seven coalitions !! and often this population account is biased because for example during hundred wars France' population was of 15 millions but it s included all the territory of modern France but normans ,Gascons,and Burgundians ,all the eastern France were vassals to king of France (like King of England) but they were enemies on the field in fact king of France could just rely on an smaller part than The English's French territory ! !! exept on the battle of Crecy or Azincourt!!! English ' army was half made up with gascons,Normans or burgundians!!
@@DidierDidier-kc4nm Do you think I don't know everything you've just told me in this pointless comment. What are you an expert now for knowing basic history. Yes France were outnumbered by those coalitions and I've never said that France only won those wars because it had a high population. However it was possible to win those wars only because it had a high population. The whole reason behind the formation of all those coalitions was that France was a monster at the time. At the time of the French Revolution they had the highest population with 22 million people. A modern country with that many people would be invincible if the other countries didn't form coalitions against them. Know what you're talking about.
daniel lanyi no i just arguing and giviing to you some histroical facts to answer to simplistic comment without arguing !
@@DidierDidier-kc4nm You're arguing without arguing gotcha. Thank you for sharing your vast knowledge of history
Forgot the battle with my mum and I arguing.
😔im sure you lost when you're mum threw a flip flop
The video shows the record of a won battle
Who won?
Me and My moms battle for the tv was in it SO EPIC
France: Everything is going well. French people: Looks like we need a revolution
I dont know if starving to death is considered "going well"
Everything was really not going well
Nothing was going well
Yeah... things were most certainly *not* going well before the French Revolution
They werent really going well but I mean that still isnt an excuse to impale the heads of innocent people
So how many wars there was on your continent?
Europe: Yes
War : "exist"
France : I wan't your entire stock
Want*
How can ypu make a mistake that bad? Thats probably less than 4th grade grammar.
You*
Azé Hein France : let's expand by war.
1115 victories later, still the same size.
”wan’t”?
Oops, u missed the fight I had in high school in Long Island, NY in 2017. Might wanna add that spot
Lmaoo
that wasn't a battle, that was a beat down ..... you animal!
Can't see it on Wikipedia?
@@skybluesam5676 They were joking
@@skybluesam5676 r/wooooosh
European: We are civilized. We love peace.
Europe : Welcome to the world's battleground.
Hipokrit
Also the most complete historical records.
Civilized and loving peace are anathema
@Air Conditioner Some people loves war until they are in it.
@Air Conditioner I can't imagine myself In those gas chambers. I hope nobody dies the same way
Europe is so peaceful
Are you nuts 🌰?
2:11 Rome was banned for use cheats
2:17 Secondary Account of Rome join the chat
F*cking smurf accounts
😂
that was good
4:46 Rome free from ban and win a battle
Rome became Byzantine Empire. Rome never truly fell until the fall of Constantoble.
Half of the battles in Europe involve either Britain, France, or Germany.
or two to 3 of these plenty of time.
Or Spain
Yep, funny. All of them involve polish...
@@nosferatu6004 1795-1918, Poland stopped existing for a while. Many wars had happened sincex
@@owenosborne-lewis5060 yes, and all of them included Poles! They were fighting in Italian army as well as Bonaparte's army. There was 2 polish uprisings and 1 insurrection. Also they fought for Hungarian and USA, independance, American Civil War. They served in Austrian, Prussian and Russian army fighting against english, turks and Japanese, and so on, so on, you might be an nationalist, but u definitely r an ignorant...
The fact that Rome had the most victories in battle from 213 BC TO 1702 is mind blowing. That’s 1915 years of being on top
most DOCUMENTED victories.
After each roman victory, there would be an enormous propaganda about the battle, with specially minted coins circulating all across europe and inscriptions carved into solid stone. Stone and coins survived the last 2k years, so they get a wikipedia entry. Other empires, eg the mongols, just slaugthered their enemies and went on to slaughter some more, so we do not know anything about their skirmishes but only about their most important battles.
The romans were good at winning battles, but they were even better at bragging about it.
@@CG-eh6oe why even battle if you're not gonna brag later?
According to themselves. The winners writes the history
@@blackpilledchad1927 The civilized winners write history, not every wimmer. If a Barbarian Mongolian wons a battle he did not write history or chronicles on it, since he's probably analphabet.
@@cowgfwolos9560 When Egyptians, persians, babylonians, medians, hurrians, sumerians, akkadians, were inventing literature, languages and alphabets, romans were still trying to eat rocks and wood
France, the UK, and Germany are like the girls that always get into school drama.
France and England have the most legendary rivalry in history.
And now we're pals
Yes, but England became the largest empire in the world, and France managed to lose its entire inheritance three times
@@БруноМарс-с2р Mongols were better
@@za.monolit Here we are talking about the rivalry of France and England, and England is the absolute winner here
@@БруноМарс-с2р you said how england became the largest empire in the world, even though the mongols were a better empire
Good old Europe, never Learned how to turn the PVP off
Actually, other continents didn't turn the PvP off. There were a lot of battles that went unrecorded.
@@nathanielhufancia4949 yay
@don vito Player vs Player.. (It's a gaming thing)
It’s only because there is only two big bosses in Asia, who are afraid of fight with themselves.
@Ancient i think he means china and india rn. but you could see 4 with japan and russia as well
France and England will be nerfed in the next update.
Youpi on est premier la France
U dota Plier??
france was nerfed in ww2 patch doe
They were already nerfed in the prussian -french warin the 1880s
@@chucknorisk6318 IKSDÉ
Its insane how Napoleon alone over doubled the amount of battles France won, even though they were already in first place.
*2000 years later:*
rome: wait why are we still on the leaderboard
I hope you're right
Well when you change your allegiance to the winning side it helps!
Maybe because Rome was the greatest "country" of all time. France sucks compared to Rome. Then it's funny how the barbarians (Germany and France) first fight versus Rome and then, when Rome was defeated, they did all to bring back to life the Roman Empire. If there was a petition to build again the Roman Empire, I would firm actually without doubts.
Crillin "Crili"
You uh, going to write Rome a letter and when they don't reply drive your car into a river? This comment reads like you have their picture on your wall.
@@Milkbutter what?
America during the civil war:
*I can never lose a battle*
George VS George
George Won
@Your Majesty, ok, I am not American so I don't give a shit 😂😂😂
@Jackson my house has more history then the usa
@@shrek19yearsago78 my house too, my house in my village was built 1560, and america was formed in 1776 😂
@@shrek19yearsago78 has your house landed on the moon?
rome: i'm the best
UK: i'm speed
france: i'm faster
us: haha bumping victories by having war agains't myself
"agains't" ??
@@sth02 bruh idk i'm french
@@Vivi-xn9iz yea the American Civil war
@@sth02 the American Civil War
@Giancarlos Benitez I would consider both as one nation but two ideologies as it's a civil war
It’s honestly funny how the American civil war just comes and goes in 1 second
The fact that two arch nemesis Carthage & Rome both stayed on the list for over a millennia after their resp. demise goes to show how massive wars between those two were for the ancient world
Actually, it just goes to show how well recorded their battles were.
Actually, that also inflates both of their numbers of wins, if Rome simply destroyed Carthage directly it would mean that Rome was way stronger but would have way fewer wins. Also, the punic wars happened around the same period than warring states period in China, the largest scale was during the 2nd punic war where both sides had more than 100 000 men while during the battle of Changping (which was only a military campaign and not a war) both sides had engaged around 500 000 men.
How well documented.
@@trollmcclure2659 that's mainly due to population if you look at percentage of men killed per population the punic wars really were like romes world War
rome's demise was 600 years ago. byzantine empire was not a thing. it was rome.
Macedon: "Hey we're doing pretty good!"
Rome: "Hold my beer."
*hold my wine 🍷
Rome: *basically fucks Europe, North Africa and Western Middle East in the ass*
To be fair, the Roman leadership was obsessed with Alexander the Great's accomplishments and wanted to emulate him.
@@ericlanglois9194 I guess it is better to emulate him then to immolate him. Haha! Poor guy... Just kidding.
Yeah, Rome won the most real men battles, before it became easier to kill others with the click of a trigger
Rome had most battles won 15 centuries straight
Greatest empire ever
It is not the greatest empire , It is THE EMPIRE , the universal empire ,
Read the description
@Sasquatch no he tells you himself that these are the ones from wikipedia. We know about a lot more battles than this. Wikipedia just doesn't list it.
British Empire : Am i joke to you?
@@mainuddinfahim6044 yes
I was look at the map as white = water and black = land for so long and I was just like “What goofy map is this?”