Man Solves Tesla’s Secret To Amplifying Power By Nearly 5000%
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ย. 2024
- This technology and information can and will quite literally change the world overnight. Jim Murray needs your help to get his energy paradigm shifting information out to the public.
Jim has been a student of Nikola Tesla's work for decades and he's solved Tesla's secrets to amplifying power by nearly 5000%.
Sound crazy? That's what we thought - until we saw it work.
Jim has already secured funding from investors on the technology side, but he needs your help to write a book which explains to everyone how it's done. Your donation will help spread the information that will transform energy use as we know it.
Please help Jim ensure that 'Genius never dies.'
DONATE HERE: www.gofundme.c...
Full Story by The Free Thought Project HERE: thefreethoughtp...
Follow Up Story: thefreethought...
There are more Jim Murray videos/interviews on this channel!
Follow The Free Thought Project on FB:
On Twitter: / thefreethought2
On Minds: www.minds.com/...
On MeWe: mewe.com/p/the...
On Telegram: t.me/TheFreeTh...
On Gab: gab.com/TheFre...
On Parler: parler.com/pro...
and Flote: flote.app/Free...
Check out the website: thefreethoughtp...
![POLYCAT - ข้อความรูปยิ้ม :) [Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lBhIgPGCgbI/mqdefault.jpg)
After reading some comments here I'm dismayed by how uneducated and ignorant our population is and its scary.
Thank you Sir for sharing your knowledge and experience.... those 2 things are priceless 🙌
"After reading some comments here I'm dismayed by how uneducated and ignorant our population is and its scary. "
True. Some people actually think that you can amplify power, and that this guys contraptions ever did anything more than make noise and waste energy.
I put it down to a combination of lack of education, scientific naivete,
and greed.
Scary ndeed.
You have no need to be scared, as it seems your reality resides with the leaders of our world. This is the way of our world, where reality is constrained to hinder exponential development. The inherent naivety held by many to that of scientific fields knowledge answering all, when theories, laws & rules govern seen progress outright. Educational systems globally are the apprenticeship to a preordained reality to live one's life within defined borders. Intellect gained through knowledge can allow for views through the defined veil. To distinguish reality from realism is a gifted technique to a minimal percentage of the population, as truth & non conformity tends to harbor burden within modern life.
TRUTH or TRANCE
In 1990 I worked for a food plant that created a lot of dust in Process. Large fans with large 460VAC motors turned the fans. The power supplier in the area generated most or all of their own power, a small company. They sent my maintenance supervisor a box containing capacitors and resistors to be installed on a 460VAC main power switch gear supplied by a stepdown transformer owned by the power company. I was only journeyman maintenance electrician working for the plant at the time, so I got the job of reading the instructions and figuring out how to make all the connections. After connecting the box to the power supply I was able to raise the pf from low 80's to round 94pf with motors running. It worked even better on fan/motor startup. There was a variable potentiometer to raise or lower the pf somewhat. The company was happy because we were paying less for same output and power company was happy becuase system pf was more balanced.
You Sir are a Genius!.. Nevermind the Nay-Sayers.. Lenz Law prevails however it is still not totally undersiood.
There is NOTHING "mysterious" about this. Inductive loads like motors create a lagging Power Factor. In cases where an establishment has a lot of motors, power companies often add a capacitor network to the service to bring the Power Factor back in line to reduce loads on the power company grid, and it incidentally reduces the power usage of the factory or business.
The fact that you are an electrician means you are well-versed in the practicalities and regulations of hooking up electrical equipment safely. That is very commendable and useful. However, if you had done even the most minimal schooling in an engineering school, you would have learned about this in the 2nd Year Electrical Power classes.
For all the people that think this is dodgy, fast forward the clip to about 24:40. He summarizes what he is doing with his work. He is not 'creating' energy. He is simply making the machines more efficient. Then restart from the beginning of the clip and watch in awe. He is cool.
yes,but,. tesla had all this sorted, without wires. he was railroaded to his death. the u.s gov ''took'', all relivent info. you cant ''charge'', for free energy.. bottom line..the ancients used this tech. taped into earths electromagnetic fields. the pyramids, mecca,, ect, are all built, on these fields. granites, will transmit power. crystal radio. on a huge scale..world wide. lost tech.. watch revalation of the pyramids. for a start..
thank you
Then WHYYYY the 5000 clickbait number in the title. I came here expecting another crackpot.
thanks for that comment i get it more now
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 It's not clickbait. It is widely accepted that all the machines humans build are wildly inefficient. Even the human body only turns about 30% of the energy we generate for muscular contraction,the rest is wasted in heat.
It's complicated but basically this man has created a way to reduce the "drag" of an induction motor SIGNIFICANTLY so it transfers over to more useful energy out of the system. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if technologies that increase efficiency in such a drastic way are actively and deliberately oppressed.
Seven years later and we're still waiting for the part where the world changes overnight.
If we send a patent saying that it goes against the laws of thermodynamics, it will be denied in an instant. We have keep it so underground that the Gov can't stop it. Like vaping or marijuana for example.
@@eddie_writes96 Yeah, I'm pretty sure the people that think this will change the world are the same people smoking marijuana.
You reminded me of what I call, ‘the inventors nightmare’ . Someone invents something good , or creates a successful business, then they sell out for a big pile of ca$h only to see their creation destroyed or shelved …
They do it to prolong the current system
@Medicinnov8r Except in this case, nothing useful was created.
The system is evil. Objectively. You think it would allow free energy devices and ideas to thrive? Why telsa have been shut down around 40 years old and spent the last 40 years of if life feeding birds and doing and thinking NOTHING!. He has been taken and they zap his brain. The evil parasite of this place destroyed deliberately the most brilliant mind of the last 200 hundred years. Do you think they change their mind about their agenda since then? Do you think That they feel remorse? Should be clear be now........................
Axioms to contemplate whilst viewing this video;
1. A little knowledge is dangerous.
2. Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
I detect intelligence .... I am relieved ..
alas, Yorick, you speak the truth.
park scale
Yorick Hunt.. you are a freaken moron.. You must have gone to university.
+George And you, George, obviously did not. lol Stay stupid forever.
Thus guy is a natural speaker and teacher. He needs to give talks at all sorts of schools all throughout the country.
What, about how to con people? 😅
Yea! The only problem is that he’s a con artist. Other than that, he’s amazing
Title: Man solves secrets!
Man: I'm not going to get into too much detail here...
Wonderful rotating machinery demo. I am glad to see someone explain the role of resonance in AC motor-generator design and utilization of elliptical rotator design to improve power factor and demonstrate how mechanical innovation can be used by the consumer to lower commercial power cost and consumption. Thanks Jim! SN
Scott, I know it's a long shot, but did you grow up in WC? I had a friend named Scott Novotny growing up.
We Love❤Smart People.
Good Job Jim👏
we love smart people, but not people who pretend to be smart by long-conning those around them.
Huh? You do realize that was complete bs… don’t you?
He’s been working on this for almost 50 years.. that’s nothing but inspiration.
You mean wasted time huh? 2nd law of thermodynamics
Nugget Butthurt
The second law of thermodynamics can't be a law if it's exceptions can be proven by amateur scientist at home, on youtube...
Thus, meaning that scientists voted wrong, when they " voted " about facts.
Nature decides natures law not man, man defines, but can't vote away natural phenomenon, also know as facts.
@@thebiggestgeee If this conversation would be happening in some place and i would be present, i'd come by and shake your hand and tell you that you should preach that way of thinking if you feel like it, this world needs more of that.
Today it's only a fact if it's written on a book but it's a lie if it's on TH-cam... it makes no difference, "what is true it's true even if nobody believes it and what is not true it's not true even if everyone believes it", and i believe it would be stupid to try and make any decision against such simple yet, fundamental logic.
Yes a sad result 50 years for nothing, that is not uncommon, just look at the host of politicians and public servants
Is it efficient maybe, can you step up, step down power by volts or amps yes, nothing our great grandfathers didn't know. Maybe it needs a new take, since our electronics are much more efficient but I say this, WHO EVER figures this out for real isn't going to get rich, they will get killed by govt or big energy if they don't take peanuts, so it ain't getting out unless you release it for free on the both Internets with repeatable plans.
Refering to the first demonstration.
So current drawn by the the motor trippled when the field coil was switched on (1.5A to5A) and then jumped another 10 percent (5.5A) when current was drawn from the generator. Therefore the power drained from the motor by the lamps increased motor current 0.5A and that required to energise the generator magnetic circuit increased motor consumption 3.5A even when no useful output was taken, so 7 times as much energy is required to maintain magnetic flux as is used by the bulbs.
He is right in that his generator requires very little extra power to produce electrical output. However this is because the generator is using a large amount of power to produce useless heat in its (unlaminated) rotor even when producing no useful electrical output.
I could make a car use hardly any more gasoline when it is accelerating than when it is idling. All i have to do is drill a hole in the carburettor float bowl so that much more fuel leaks out than is used by the engine.
"I don't want to go into too much detail." No kidding...
12:27 He's putting 122 watts through the generator coil while he's running the lights at 40 watts. (67.7 volts at 1.77 amps for the coil, 12.3 volts at 3.25 amps for the lights.)
+electrostatic1 Yeah. I don't see what is special with the generator when it's only 30% efficient. Additionally, the input current does increase to compensate for the 40W load. 12:03 the input power is about 435W ( 87V*5A) and then when he turns the lights on the current jumps up to about 5.4A so 0.4A increase meaning the input power increases by roughly 35W. Nothing particularly surprising here..
+Jack Kilian Right, I'm not an expert in electrical generation but it seems like he starts off with the motor using around 130 W. Then he increases the electromagnetic field and the current jumps to around 5, giving a power around 435 W. Not exactly a surprise, and of course we have to consider the energy he's using to generate that field also.
Then when he turns the lights on, the current increases to 5.4 A for a power increase of around 35 W. Given how inaccurate the gauges are jumping all over the place, this hardly seems surprising. He's added a load and the urrent increased.
Even if we grant him the 5 W discrepancy, given how much energy was being wasted in the first place since he was doing no appreciable work it's hardly surprising he found 5 W from somewhere.
So unsurprisingly we seem to have another person claiming to have uncovered Tesla secrets, showing some lamps come on and some numbers, and trying to raise money for their 'groundbreaking' work. At the very least this is a failure in communicating exactly what he's accomplished.
+Jack Kilian I Think the title is wrongly chosen, he does not prove the statement in his video. Theoretically what is claimed might be possible. But that would be speculation. Apart from that, I think you missed the point of what he is trying to explain.
If I understand correctly, and by all means correct me if you think I'm wrong..
Demonstration 1 - Dynaflux Alternator
For the first part of the video, the alteration he made on his type of generator, reduces the resistance generated (by the laws of physics that you cannot create energy) that is applied to the created magnetic field (rotation) the moment you close the breaker and start to tap into the generated magnetic field. (generating electricity out of momentum force created from a magnetic field. Basically what a normal generator does.) But if what he claims in values is true than a more sophisticated version of his prototype would indeed be a very big increase in efficiency. I can follow him in his explanation that the oval shape changes the resistance compared to normal generators. It also makes sense to me that the momentum created in this oval would create a more efficient flow. He does not claim at any point that he creates energy out of nothing.
He shows the effectiveness of his generator by lighting up the lamps with the exes of energy that is made available simply from his countering of the counterforce that is applied when extracting electricity from the process. The lamps merely serve as a user for the energy that is not waisted by his setup, on the contrary to traditional generators. Even if this extra output would only be a mere 1%, it would make whole of our energy creating systems 1% more efficient. 13 minutes far in the video I find his work rather very intriguing. The two people commenting above my reaction have had at least some education in the field of electricity, as I can read from their comment. So now I am surprised as to why they seem so little interested. To be continued..
A point that comes up to my mind at this time is to wonder if he (the inventor) has tested his oval shape in multi compositions of metals. For instance to make the ends of the oval out of pure lead, increasing the weight in the momentum points and thus the momentum, in combination with using lower weight metals (but obvious still metals with a high amount of electrons per atom) in the center could this create extra efficiency?
Demonstration 2 - Transforming Generator
He has a setup where he creates a certain stable power output. Without a user in the group, the output reads 59,2V with the lamp turned on, user in the circuit the voltage drops to 15,6V
45V missing? So what he explains here, is that the moment you add a user onto the output of a generators circuit, the back pushing forces inside the produced magnetic fields consume the 45 missing Volts. Inductive reactants principle. Later he explains that that generator only has 2 coils inside. So this demonstration shows an alternative way to get partially around the Inductive reactants principle. As normal generators require quite some coils in them, this would enable to build generators cheaper and make the process cost us less natural resources, in this case mainly copper. Again I find his work very intriguing. His alternative way includes a closed circuit that leads into the second coil and thus as he claims getting around the Inductive reactants Principle.
If I understand correctly, than after charging one coil, he then charges the other coil by creating a closed circuit to it. And then afterwards releases all the stored energy from both coils into the lamps. Again this seems like a more efficient way to produce electricity. And in this case also a direct resource saving way in the creation of the parts itself.
Demonstration 3 - Switched Energy Resonance Power Supply (S.E.R.P.S.)
To be continued when I have more time. But anyway, the moment that you can explain to someone else what you have learned, than you truly understand the matter you learned.
In case this man claims are correct, than he is indeed a genius.
+Robin Thomas G good job here
+R Koster I assure you this isn't a lack of intelligence on my behalf. I'm a mechanical engineer with a degree in physics, including the fundamentals of electromagnetism so I have some appreciation for what he's talking about. It may be that I don't understand some of the underlying concepts or systems he is assuming knowledge of, or that I have completely misunderstood what he's trying to explain. But the video appears to be trying to explain his device in layman's terms for people to understand, so I think at the very least he is not communicating it well.
The very title of 'amplifying power by 5000%'; seems rather odd and open to interpretation, depending exactly what they mean by 'amplify'. A stereo amplifier can easily amplify an input by 50 times so it's not even that impressive a claim to make.
But I'm sure I am misunderstanding something. So, perhaps if you understand it so well, please explain it?
As an 80 year old retired lecturer in electrical engineering I commend your approach to a subject a little difficult for the average electrician to understand. You have , without a doubt, explained the basic principles and demontrated clearly the areas of your research. It is clear that you have spent time and money ( not to mention expertice) to be able to demonstrate the concept.
I have used your demontration to explain to my mature students (Yes I'm still doing it) the importance of your research.
A comment from a student was , and I quote, the modern Tesla.
Thank you so much for your work and efforts may they be rewarded when history recognises your acheivements. Thank You
What exactly has he achieved ?
MrSummitville Apparently he has figured out a way to make electrical motors more efficient.
Electrical Engineer here. He is simply demonstrating basic electrical power factor adjustment that is taught in every electrical technician school and used daily in designing any facilty using large electrical motors. Nothing ground breaking I could see.
What about the use of negative torque as positive output from the system that must have some level of value compared to standard design wouldn’t you say?👌
It cannot be used in any standard resistive design in electrodynamics, so in this design there’s that gain!
A proper teacher.
Indeed yes he is. He reminds me of an instructor in a class which I was assistant. It was a college coarse from which I received my masters. I was 1st Yr high school. The instructor and I built a shop at his house and 'toyed' with these concepts and many others. My preferred field was RF communications and audio. Very good presentation. 👍
I knew an old man, had a tiny motor turning a large old alternator, run through an inverter, connected to his 220v welder, welding major repairs on heavy equipment.
Tons of power for the minor draw of a small old motor%
yea yea and i knew an even older man with an even smaller motor turning an even larger generator etc etc...
viermidebutura you can be a skeptic, but I was about 20 at the time, and I watched him use a small 5amp draw electric motor, plugged into a regular outlet, to power a large 240V welder while he welded repairs to an old tractor.
I was too young and inexperienced at the time to truly appreciate what he had done, and even today I don't know enough about electricity to truly appreciate what he had done.
Jim, share your knowledge with all people of the world or the powers-be will steal it away and bury you like they did with other inventors that tried to profit from their inventions. Do it ASAP. Let other people join in and crowd-source the further development. This is too big to keep secret. You can still get the credit and benefit not only yourself, but the whole world - to create that large of impact is the best thing one can enjoy, imo. Make it Open-Source.
+Azat S exactly. It's pointless until its open source.
+Azat S yep if it ain't open source quickly, it will be lost when they suicide him...
All of his work is public. He's relayed everything he can via his lectures. This is only a short, small part of his work.
Well, cory, link to it then please. How do I build this miracle machine?
+walperstyle I know Google is hard, but give it a try. If you can't find the detailed pages and lectures then you wouldn't posses the intelligence to build anything in his plans anyway. Not to mention the fact that you call it a "miracle machine" demonstrates your ignorance.
35:20 "The power that lights that lamp has already been used to turn the motor". LOL. That's like buying beer with money already used to pay the mortgage.
Yeah, You don't have power going in and out at the same time with electricity, the two different things would be happening simultaneously, and cancelling each other out. So basically the 'motor' would just present a very high "reactance" and not turn at all. (meanwhile the thing is making a large grinding noise, a special kind of sound which has negative power?). That IS a very "sucky" sounding motor but that is not the sound of free energy being sucked out of the ambient medium. Its the sound of a beautiful looking but silly and ineptly designed motor with lots of extra friction making a nasty grinding noise as it wastes energy. Especially silly is the idea that 100 watts are going into the motor, causing it to turn, and meanwhile it is generating 150 watts coming out. As i said in another comment, that means he is getting free energy, which he should just sell, to make infinite profits, since it costs nothing to make. Amplifying energy 5000 % is nonsense. Its the baloney that's amplified 5,000%. Silliest thing yet, IS, You CAN get "free" energy from the sun, or wind, or discharging the ionosphere into a Tesla coil, which were in fact among Tesla's ideas that he put into practice, in various limited ways. The energy in those cases ultimately comes from the sun, as Tesla describes in great detail. Why no one seems to have a TH-cam video with an accurate description of Tesla's ideas for harnessing the suns energy is beyond me. Tesla published a pretty detailed theory, notes and photo's in the Century magazine in June 1900, in a lengthy article entitled "The problem of increasing Human energy, with special reference to harnessing the sun's energy'. He DID NOT suggest he had invented a perpetual motion machine. He was a REAL scientist!
It's all too often that I come across a video like this with thousands of comments from very naive people. I just hope that there happens to be compounded number of them on youtube. It's hard to fathom how people are willing to believe whatever they want to believe without skepticism. What he has shown is basically a bunch of lights, gauges, and switches. He does not show anything that a hobbyist couldn't throw together in a few weekends and put together a complete make-believe story behind it. All you would have to do is sell it. Tell you exactly what each neat-looking project does with confidence and a straight face. Everybody loves to listen to grandpa. Well played sir.
Okay I'm gonna go through a few of the more massively glaring false claims here. In the first machine he puts in about 425 watts and gets out about 36 watts. An efficiency of 8.5%. And claims this is better than a commercial generator? Buul Crahp. Modern generators easily get above 90% efficient. All this is very inefficient transformer. In fact, the funky rotor actually reduces the performance. @14:26 he says that EMF and voltage are not the same. They are by definition. He says EMF is "the force that pushes current" but he says that the "pressure of the charge that cannot flow through the impedance" is voltage. Voltage is literally defined as the relative electric potential between two points in space. He then goes on to demonstrate that a voltage sags under load of the 300W bulb (as expected). But he claims @18:53 that the inductive reactance is "consuming" the voltage. Reactance (again by definition) does not "consume" anything. It simply stores energy from one portion of an AC cycle, and returns it in another. The second winding is simply a magnetizing field winding. It just applies a biasing magnetic field to the rotor. Nothing new, and nothing useful either. You can even hear the drive motor bog down under load when he turns the second bulb on. @28:20 he claims that power companies penalize you for having a low power factor, but this is not true. Power companies charge residences based on true power only, not apparent power. As for the device as a whole, none of his numbers add up. He is drawing 220 reactive watts from the wall. This is current that causes resistive heating and losses, but it does no work. It is 0% efficient. Essentially wasted energy (but he somehow claims that a low power factor is good?). The top meter claims 12.5 volts and 1.7 amps. This is 21 watts, not 29 as shown. This is an error of about 30%. It appears that the mode LED is not working on the WT110 meter, leading me to believe it's set to mean or DC instead of RMS. This would cause an error of root 2 (depending on the waveform) which would perfectly account for the extra power being displayed. On the bottom meter you can clearly see the green mode light is NOT set to RMS, so the same error has been made, the meter is computing the power from the average voltage which will completely invalidate the reading. In reality he has made a machine to take your household power supply from 99.99% efficient to about 70% efficient. Completely wasting the extra energy. He then says that this low power factor HELPS the power company!?? It is exactly the opposite. Low power factor causes losses that the energy company has to pay for. For the three phase motor he claims that the speed increases with voltage, but it's still synchronous. No it's not. A synchronous motor is locked in phase to the power BY DEFINITION!! If it rotates at a different speed than the power, it's not synchronous. The last motor is simply a switched reluctance motor. Nothing new here either. They can be useful under very specific conditions, but are generally larger and heavier than other types.
The other 82 - 90% of lost power is tranformed into Sound, obviously..
Wise words man
This is 100% what I was thinking as I watched. Thank you for this comment.
Those of us who actually know what they are talking about can see right through the bullshit artist.
Finally… some sanity!
If you want free energy either use the sun, geothermal, wave, wind or don't pay your power supplier.
or get a bike a dynamo and a very large acid battery tank
stay in shape and be off the grid
the first part of the magnet falling through the pipe is called an eddy current
the beginning of what this moron thinks is his little magic act thats supposed to fool other morons .
I am 32 and sense my teens, I have been inventing and mainly inventing sustainable creations. I have had goverment step in and denounce my working prototypes for electric cars. I now have an invention that reduces any property kilowatts usage by 60%. It is my next endeavor and my hats off to you sir. We need more people in the world like yourself.
Come back when you've built a working prototype.
Outstanding work you are doing. I worked in electrical field for 54 years. Mostly as an hourly worker but with times of salaried work as well. I would have loved to be able to work in a large shop experimenting and building electrical projects and designs. Opportunities lost.
@max marrero 11 months ago he was
Indeed but to fantasize about what could have been is what we got left.
"The power that's lighting that lamp is power that has already been used to turn the motor." That is nonsense. Power is the rate at which energy is absorbed or produced within a circuit. Once power has been absorbed, it represents energy that has transformed into heat. So power is used or generated just once, unless you use the temperature difference to recover some of the energy that was absorbed, transformed into heat.
You are right, these experiments are a waste of time. Learning some basic stuff about physics and electricity would be a good idea.
@@raouldemer2300 I would hate to discard all the work he has done. He says he has dramatically improved motor and generator efficiency. Someone more knowledgeable than I needs to evaluate what he has done to see if this is true. An improvement of just 10% in efficiency would be revolutionary, whether his understanding is correct or not.
THANK YOU FOR POINTING THIS OUT.
Do you also have any thoughts about how efficient his motors can be, when they make so much sound.
As I believe it’s friction that makes the sound in his motor system, and friction makes heat, and sound, that something that uses a lot of energy,
So what I wonder 💭 about is, how efficient can a noisy machine be, . ?
@@duckduckandeby405 That is an excellent insight. And the title of this video alone should alert us that this is pseudoscience.
For most of his life, Tesla did sensible and practical work, and did not have "secrets". The big example is efficient transmission of energy using alternating current flowing on the outside of wires.
Only toward the end of his life did he become withdrawn and secretive, but even then he did not really hide his interests. Power, in any modern device, simply cannot by amplified by 50 times. That is obvious to anyone who has done well in high school physics.
And, except for relatively tiny prototypes, Tesla's desire to see the safe wireless broadcast of energy was never successful. It is not even clear that being around high-power radio waves, at any frequency, is good for one's health.
@@david203 The most important words in your comment..."He says" He has done no actual work other than to fabricate existing technology and then twist it to sound like he has created something new.
I want my flux capacitor! Now! :D
thanks Jim for the great sharing with detailing and his patients , this proves that energy generation give over 100% power is possible.
Re demo #1: How about a simple watts in : watts out statement?
And compare that ratio to a traditional generator...
Watts in/ watts out ? That is to simple & funnels thinking back to being to conventional. Time to relearn math.
I believe Mr. Murray has something here. Not too long ago, people were using power factor correction to lower the cost of electricity by raising the efficiency of motors through capacitive phase shifting. Essentially, the use of a capacitor or a bank of capacitors across motor windings increases efficiency by tuning the electromagnetic load to the power line frequency (60Hz). The power companies use that method all the time to correct for line loses and and to compensate for back EMF currents. All Mr. Murray is doing is taking the wasted energy created by an electromagnetic device, flipping its phase and adding it to the incoming power, thereby using the back emf to do work in tandem with the forward emf. It's not voodoo nor any other free energy 'device'. It is just science. Now let the name calling and attempts to discredit begin. RA
Raving Apache
Good point here, but to add to that what he is doing with the S.E.R.P.S system, regarding the subject of power factor, or really inductive reactance, circuit loads, is going further, & showing that the input side from mains is powering an inductive/reactive type of circuit where Var power is usually the result. But the S.E.R.P.S circuit shows that it's possible to do that with Watts power!, and if you don't mind me saying that's some next level Tesla shit! :)
Will someone explain to me WTF is a "BAR"???
WTF does it have to do with anything here???
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_(unit) Yes, he has something here, reducing the output torque on a good motor! 6X0.4Amps=2.4Amps! If you don't understand how I got the factor of 6, just move on.
Aquamon Yeah, the whole video is a waste of bandwidth. When I saw Jim, in another UTube video, on the same dais with a bunch of other "free energy" nuts - Eric Dullard et al - I knew this video would be and is a total exercise in broadcasting bullshit.
Quantum Leap yeah simple capitalism says if his claims were true energy generation companies would be beating daow his door, if his stuff saved them money that means higher profits and they love higher profits.
APenNameAndThatA The guy in the video is just a confused old man with visions of grandeur. What he "thinks" he has and what is really happening are two very different things.
Take this knowledge and put it on open source so that others CAN use it and we create a new world
I always knew there are aliens among us.... this guy is one of them. ;D
Give this man a lifetime achievement award already, he's been working on it for over 40 years!
Unfortunately as we know it, the laws of physics cannot be broken to make energy out of nothing, or even retain it without some loss.
Friction, heat, and eddy currents will always slow down a body in motion on Earth and even in space to some degree.
He can't. It makes no sense and this is false. Hence he is not a billionaire.
@@iphoneadamf billionaires don't want this knowledge being leaked because you can't make billions off FREE energy, get it?
Its a good thing you didn't bore us with the actual evidence that proves your machines work. Instead of being bored I had a good laugh. Thank you!
What kind of 'evidence' do you need ?
There's a) mathematical b) meter reading c) things speed up under load
d) it self rotates (which is always video fakery )
The only way to convince anyone is to let them build their own machine and evidence themselves. Trouble is, most people don't have the wherewithal to do it. So that's why we keep paying the power companies
@@failforwardresearch3127 Does this Jim guy power his own house or use the electric companies power? The answer to that question reveals all you need to know.
@@CanadianCarbonUnit The difference is consensus. Millions of people have used solar and report their efficacy. This guy claims to create technology that no other human has experienced. It seems rather odd to me that his experiments are setup the way they are as it could easily be contrived. Simple solution would be to cut power to your entire house and show us it really works.
@@darken3150 I would settle for side by side simultaneous comparison between conventional and his 'inventions'.
His talk of opposing torque requiring more input power to the motor is 100% true, that is how these systems work. His alternate design supposedly lowers the amount of additional input under load, but in no way did he demonstrate this.
A 10% gain would be significant, if you think of running a generator from a gas motor. More generation per tank, but again, he did not show us anything.
I didn't see a 5000% amplification of power. I think the OP doesn't have a clue regarding power generation.
@@CanadianCarbonUnit BUT we saw no side by side comparison that showed this significant increase in efficiency. I don't need the math or proprietary info, just side by side comparison results. We got nothing from this video.
I have knowledge and have worked in the industry, I am not a newby to things electrical. I am intrigued by his claims and disappointed at the same time.
Download all his videos
Thank you for sharing your knowledge Jim Murray. In an age of waste, more efficiency is worth a lot.
Wtf
Omg
This inst supposes to be just efincentsy its free energy
Well claimed to be who know if it is I'd like to know for sure I believe its possible for sure I lived for free I didn't have to do nothing to be here that I know off so u never know
There wasn't one example of better efficiency shown in that garbage video.
this is all bullshit.
Wow from the age 19 till the age of 66 years to be working on Alternative Energy. Great foresight :)
Yessir, any day now.
Around 29 mins and this guy is why so many people don't know anything when answering 'man on the street' question that 3rd graders answer with ease.
I cant even believe that there are people with his age showing fake stuff,
Yes. I saw a perpetual generator that used no other energy supply except for the initial start up.
According to the laws of physics that is deemed a type B perpetual. Motion machine
No, you didn't.
I could listen to his Gentlemen Talk all Day Long.... Thank You for Sharing :)
I with to be like you. Unfortunately he put me to sleep after 15 minutes. He would be great as a hypnotherapist. :-)))
Other than that he sounds like a smart dude.
I find it very telling that in all his talk about EMF, he is very careful to not use the word "Amperage". 🤔
I love how all these energy guys just turn on light bulbs!
TheAgeOfReason Farmigreven
I would be more impressed if he designed and built a machine that set up a candle and lit it.
As a mid 20's getting my bachelors in mechanical engineering (not too wild about any of my classes, but interested in designing and the physical world), I find this video great. There are hundreds of under-lying layers of theory and math that he does not delve into. If he wrote a paper on this, I would imagine it could be hundreds to thousands of pages long, explaining everything in rigorous detail. For someone that can comprehend this, I commend them. I hope to accomplish something like this in my time, if not to keep progressing technology to help the human race.
REMEMBER FOR EVERY FORCE THERE MUST BE AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE FORCE. THAT REACTION IS CONVERTED TO HEAT FOR MOTORS. AND ELECTRIC FLOW IS NOT 100% EFFICIENT, WHEN THEY WRITE OPOSING MAGNETIC FORCES ON FIELD WINDINGS LIKE THREE PHASE OR POLY PHASE THE EFFICIENCY GOES UP. HIS ELLIPTICAL ROTOR OVERCOMES THE CLOCKING OF A MOTOR WHERE THE MAGNETIC FIELD IS CONSTANTLY PARALLEL TO THE FIELD.
@@peteraustin3271 Yes. But why are you yelling?
For some of us this is child's play and makes him look either deceitful or a fool or both.
@@DrHarryT will you explain please
@@vicarious1 I have been performing electro/mechanical, electronic repair and inventive improvement fabrication starting 45 years ago.
We'll take his first contraption, assuming his digital meters are reasonably accurate which they should be and then applying Ohm's law math we find that he is putting in way more power than he is getting out of it, yet postulating that he has improved efficiency. Anyone who looks at those meters and applies Ohm's law knows he is full of Sh**. :-)
Irregardless is not a word
I irregard you.
You sacrifice something. Nothing is free and everything has a price. If you take 100 volts and bump it up to 10,000 volts it's because you're sacrificing amps.
This man is a true engineering genius!
What he has created is truly amazing!
Petrol driven electrical generators can now run on the smell of an oily rag!
There is practically no resistance in the electrical generator under load.
Rolls eyes
That's what happens when you capture and repurpose back emf before it collapses with timing and switching circuitry able to keep up.
You still need a fuel burning, fissioning, or fusing prime mover to move it, you can just get away with the same use of energy with less loss in a shorter time window or more "power"..
No Tessla was: It's right in the title, and the title itself is an impossibility, so absolute nonsense. Go back to high school to find out why you can never get more power out of a system than you put into it! Hint: The laws of thermodynamics.
@@Bob-of-Zoid you can never get more energy out than you put in, not power, this does not violate Ohm's Law, Faraday's Laws, Joule's Law, Lenz's Law, Kirchoff's Law nor the 1st or 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics, the prime mover still needs an external input to drive it, the permanent magnets need to be remagnetized every 4 or 5 centuries, the prime mover to drive the system still needs to burn, split, or fuse fuel to put out the heat needed to convert to mechanical work to drive the damned thing, stop falsely appealing to physics laws like you get what he's talking about.
Entropy is still happening, but it's delayed a bit due to lessening the loss due to the device's ability to capture Lenz's Law back EMF and flyback as useful charge to a degree and send it back into the system so it happens, but it no longer does the counter-motive drag back emf normally does..
Power is the amount of work able to be done divided by time, do not conflate power with energy, energy only exists when it's made to, because energy is only the ability to do work, that's it.
Millennial Research Corporation was gonna make motors based off of another way to do this exact same thing, but they died in a plane crash and I don't know who's sitting on the patent rights to the Magnetronic Tech right now...
@@Bob-of-Zoid You do not even understand the science behind it. The fact is that under normal conditions a power generator works against itself for a lot of it's action.
This man has devised a way of harnessing that power, therefore amplifying the output power harnessed that otherwise would be lost.
You don't have a clue what you are talking about, and learn how to spell Tesla you moron.
Simple, 2nd law of thermodynamics. Energy balance equation must include frictional losses. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. Great effort on your part to achieve an impossible outcome .
Your half right you can't create or destroy energy. You can harvest and store it in different forms. You can use electricity to create other sources of fuel that in return create more energy then used. Your thinking like there's a box or walls that limit momentum. Think of everything as a sphere multi directionally n s e w up down left right forwards backwards 369 degree in every possibly way ever flowing no boundaries or obstacles nothing is bound by any laws only by your beliefs in said laws.
So then is the dude stupid or lying?
@@carpballet neither he's getting closer to solving the missing equation. Edison made 100s of light bulbs before found the right equation. He didn't fail 100s of times he learned what didn't work many times. Everything worth doing comes with a long journey up hill both ways
@@healingmusic9124 Maybe I could help?
@@carpballet unless you know the resonant frequency Tesla figured out it can't be done this way not that I know of anyway. There's other options to make it work but involves a gas engine as the workhorse. There's free gas that can run a engine to turn the generator motors. It's still free almost perpetual energy but it isn't totally perpetual you have to oil and keep the "gas" engine running or use a battery bank like would solar an just start the "gas" engine when battery bank drops 40% or less of its charge
4 years later and I'm still waiting for the world to change!
@@martinkuliza As long as there are gullible people like you in the world conmen will always make a living.
We can come back to this in 20 years and still he will have achieved nothing!
This all belongs in a museum along side Stanley Meyer's water powered car.
@@martinkuliza The set up 1:33. The lie 1:38. The con 1:55. Lot of true but irrelevant technobable for good measure. Whatever losses real engineers allegedly don't understand is what remains after the 99.05% efficiency that has already been achieved. To be fair that's a large 44 megawatt motor at full load. If it sounds to good to be true...
@@martinkuliza he's (a) lying, (b) fooled himself or (c) discovered new science that also dismisses the very science he is referencing. It's not self consistent. Again there's no magic woo here 99.05 efficiency doesn't leave any room for it.
No one in their right mind considered a flat earth troll with an open mind.
You can't debunk a flat earth model because THEY HAVE NO FLAT EARTH MODEL. Their sheeple meanderings are not self consistent. .02... 5% are cons exploiting the unwashed masses for utube bucks. 10% are sheeple that gravitate towards conspiracy theories. 85% are trolls just out for a goof.
@@martinkuliza I thought the OR between a and b was implied. I happened to see that scimandan video, he was being quite gracious. I even gave you my wag on flerths % population distribution. Yes rigorous testing of established theory is part and parcel science . Again efficiency = power out/power in. 99.05% doesn't leave much room for woo. Note that's an ABB claim but I don't think there's too much marketing wankery there we had high 80s efficiency 4 decades ago.
"the earth goes round the sun"
... nutter
do I need to go on.?
Modern motors and generators boast efficiencies of over 95%, with some as high as 98%. What does this mean? Well, efficiency is power-out divided by power-in (normally expressed as a percentage). So an efficiency of 95% means that 5% of the input power is lost, usually in the form of heat. At one point in the video he talks about an efficiency of 341.19%. It is not possible to have an efficiency greater than 100% since that would imply that you're getting more power out than you are putting in. Strangely, elsewhere he acknowledges that you can't do that.
In a.c. systems, power is not equal to volts x amps unless the voltage and current waveforms are in phase. If they are not in phase, then some (or in extreme cases, all) of the power at one point in the cycle is fed back to the source in a different part of the cycle. A proper watt meter will take this into account, whereas something that simply multiplies voltage time current will not do so. So this is probably what is confusing him.
Either that or he's trying to con us.
Brilliant, changing the shape of the alternator is something really novel.
My light bill has more than doubled since the release of this video.
Doesn't look like he discovered anything
@@johncuervo3019 They are trying to compensate por the losses they will suffer when this technology goes mainstream, or for the money they will spend buying him out, and then burying the tech so it never reaches the public.
And I'm accepting donations to write a book debunking this bunk
Wow! I was a US Navy Sonar tech and dealt with power transmission aboard submarines. So much is of true value here. If I can find sourcing, I will help you. We need this kind of tech in motors & generators.
Right!!! Just think about having a nuclear submarine but with batteries for silent running and his much more efficient electric motor!!! And the samr goes for electric cars. He NEEDS to get a meeting with elon musk. So that way he can make money for his very hard work. He deserves to make money from his inventions/discoverys. I wonder how far a Tesla electric car could go with his up grades to the motors and to all the other systems.
@@jacobsweeney2330
"The universe creates power, why can't we without fossil fuels."
You haven't been watching the news lately have you?
No, seriously; do you want those kinds of people to have the ability to create power?
It's bad enough that they can't control their delusions and use the energy they have responsibly. If they were able to create energy, they would use it for nefarious purposes like turning you into a slave.
@@jacobsweeney2330
"Are you part of modern day society?? If yes, you’re a slave."
If you were a real slave, you would not have the liberty to post on TH-cam.
@@jacobsweeney2330
What's a cell phone?
No, just kidding. 😏
However, my cell phone remains off unless I am making a call.
But then, it's specifically for emergency purposes so people are not likely to be calling me on it.
I've been thinking of transferring my landline number to a cell phone so I can block unwanted robo calls that refuse to obey the do not call list. Doing so will also save me money.
However, I do wonder, just how many people will give money to an organization that violates the law and calls them despite their number being on the national do not call list. I refuse to, regardless of their claimed good cause.
If a company violates the national do not call list, can you genuinely expect them to use the money in accordance with the law? As unimportant as the national do not call list seems; it does tell you about the character of the organization that either follow it or do not follow it. And as far as I'm concerned, that includes those organizations that the law exempts from compliance. A person does not put their number on that list only to have to deal with a political or government organization that is calling them for the purpose of conducting a survey.
@@bobthompson4319 "I wonder how far a Tesla electric car could go with his up grades to the motors and to all the other systems."
Theoretically infinitely far. That is, if what he is saying is true. It isn't of course. It's a scam.
All of the equipment and models in this video are so old school. Like 1960 old. These days all of this can be done and tested so cheap and quick with 3D printers and arduinos.
24:39 LISTEN BEFORE YOU COMMENT.
I agree with your remark entirely.
I had a strong sense of Tesla's original thoughts and understandings of the harmonics with nature and electricity that you seem to understand to a greater degree. I appreciate your life long work in this field to further the the age in which we live in. And wish you the best going forward. your a amazing human being.
Tesla's "D_ath ray" was implemented in the 1940s in germany and then a version was later developed by the U.S. army - the "Active Denial System" (you can find it on wiki and also by searching on the name). It focuses very high frequency electromagnetic waves (microwaves).
There was a vehicle that used a version of his device on November 4, 1957 at Fort Itaipu, Brazil. (search on "incident november 4, 1957 fort itaipu").
I work with a small EE/physics team on artificial gravity devices. We have not yet 'connected the dots' from Tesla to artificial gravity to 1940s germany, but germany was developing art grav stuff at that time, and since they copied his focused high frequency RF beam devices, it's possible that when Tesla mentioned "dynamic gravity" that he had documented it and germans got wind of it.
Our first device was a Lorentz disk, a copy of the shape of the generic vehicle:
1) thin aluminum layers, each separated by insulation - this foil-insulator-foil-insulator etc. lamination is oriented horizontally
2) vertical and axial (centered) magnetic field
3) radially- and horizontally positioned coils, close to but not touching the foils lamination
4) the coils were fed by 16.28Mhz, chosen due to the skin depth based on the thickness of the foil
The vertical, centered B field, and the radial, horizontal induced currents developed the Lorentz force (right hand rule, recall) leading to coherent accelerations (oscillations) of the charged particles in the metal at the 16.28Mhz rate
Tesla's work was plagiarized
When I worked class 318 at the USPTO up to 1981, I had a lot of DC brushless motors and a fair share of odd ball designs -- but nothing like this. I also had class 290 which included all perpetual motors when connected to a dynamo. In class 290, the law allowed a requirement for a working model presented by the inventor. I had a lot of 'interesting' presentations under this but never had such a level-headed inventor as this person. I'm convinced.
A credulous colleague? What are you convinced about?
The "Man Solves Tesla’s Secret To Amplifying Power By Nearly 5000%"?
I'll have you know that the "class" Devices for massaging internal cavities in Humans, was way more interesting and informational. :)
I'm convinced you're clueless.
@@harryjohnson615 I think that that is where I started my comment. Your point?
@@panostriantaphillou766 None of that was handled (PUN) on the 9th floor of building 4 except in their off hours. I wouldn't suggest that our one female examiner had more experience in that matter but we had a rather young and vivacious female support staff on many of the floors and all four buildings.
@@johnredman938 Actually, upon reading your comment again I think your comment was facetious if so then I apologize but if not there's nothing credulous about this guy.
Electric motors and generators are already very efficient (95%).. claiming 5000% more "power" from them and still claiming you aren't trying trying to make a over-unity device or perpetual motion is an oxymoron
Here's a link that's quite old talking about this vid
www.eevblog.com/forum/dodgy-technology/amplifying-power-by-nearly-5000-(report)/new/?topicseen#new
This is basically just a Rotorverter. If you want to make one, replicate the Rotorverter technology. The key here is that he is using standing waves in the LC circuit and he is centering the voltage node across the lightbulb. Any time you tap standing waves (aka voltage and amp node) to run your load, 'anomalous" amounts of energy can be produced. He did not invent or discover shit for the record, this is the invention of Hector Peres Torres of ARK Research, and Nikola Tesla before him.
+Rik Nelson What makes you think the standard electronic theory is perfect? Tesla spoke about standing waves and nodes on more than a dozen occasions. The thing that you call a "Tesla coil" is not actually the same circuits or tuning which was used by Nikola Tesla. The spark gap, capacitors, and the relationship between the primary and secondary coils are all modified. Tesla was very clear about this. Do some research in to Eric Dollard if you want the mathematical equations that prove what we are talking about.
+Rik Nelson Dude ,,,Your'e right on..Most Idiots here have no clue what the hell they yapping about....Talk is cheap,always has been,I tried fighting them off myself,but like damned ZOMBIES they just keep multiplying.......You know ??????AWERAGE IQ is 100 ,,what they dont make public is that 80 percent of population has their place below 90th meridian. Capiche///
After reading both I found out that they are one in the same, Eric simply replicated the technology and simplified the mathematics.
*****
SOOOO,,,,you then must be uneducated,unschooled GENIOUS with a room temperature IQ if my words are offensive to you directly. I've never spoke to YOU directly,nor do i really want to as i would obviously wasting my time,so please SHUT YOUR YAPPER as you sound much smarter when your thoughts are NOT expressed.......You know nothing about MY education,beliefs,ideas or background and i care NOT finding any more about you than what is in public domain.....And what i see there is a lot of MUMBO_JUMBO_NEW AGE JUNK that impresses you obviously......Key word is junk and the underscore of new age movement is delusional and METAPhysical .So there,,,,,,plain and simple: STFUp.kid...leave adults alone and go play with your toys..
*****
Hey Dimwit..U sure are funny....So,,,,,all of us MILLIONS of DEGREED engineers,professors,various system designers and technicians with combined millions of years of experience in electrical engineering field know NOTHING and are illusional/Delussional????But You on the other hand all by yourself(and few others out there) have all these issues clearly sorted out for us MILLIONS of ignorant proffesionals???Maybe i have to be thankfull to you or one of your flat-earth Bible-thumping buddies for being able to enjoy all the benefits of properly engineered products????? GTFOutahere and STFUp,MORON.
I heard this poor guy had an accident last month he..... fell backwards and hit his head on two bullets lying upright on the floor such a freak accident !!
***** Yeah the cops said it was a 1 in a googleplex freak accident for both primers going off ! Though they where considering the possibility of suicide.
Daves Reality He was most likely killed by another person who made it look like an accident.
I agree he probably fell o. his head but looks very much alive
I heard he was suicided with nine shots from a nail gun.
I heard it worked and he got wealthy
I hope this man is safe and has been able to continue progressing unmolested by anyone with ill intent.
My first thoughts upon seeing this were. “Nnooo don’t show on TH-cam, you’ll end up like so many others.”
for instance then most recent I know of is David LaPoint. We were right with him on the edge of our seats and then he showed up in the forest. Rattled showing verbally and visibly.
The key he realized is forgoing the dreams of riches and releasing it al for free. That is the only chance you have of these technologies reaching the public. The monetary system is one of control and it does that well with all it entanglements, pitfalls and the endless exploitable means of derailing, blocking, and draining of ones finances and sanity
No, that's exactly how you save your self, you SHARE it, with everyone! Otherwise you're DEAD.
The only thing happening to the these con artists is they disappear with other people's money that invested in their scams.
@@AvgDan since when was science a scam? Stick to the 90 second videos your attention span can handle kiddo
@@twistednuts6062 what observable repeatable and predictable science would you be referring to? This scamming for donations video is certainly not science.
@@twistednuts6062 Trust me its a scam .. his system doesn't work
6 minutes in, and this is very well explained to someone who is somewhat familiar with electricity, but not really.
At around 4:00 he shows a rotor which he says is common in a small generator. It is absolutely NOT. I have never seen such a rotor, wonder from which device it is. Then he tells that the power is taken off the rotor which has not been done on an AC generator since the days of Edison. Then at the first demonstration he shows that two flood light are power by the generator's output while the DC motor is virtually not consuming any power at all. Only 5A at 80V. That is about 400W. At 13:30 I stopped wasting my time watching. I just cannot imagine that this person invests hundreds and thousands of hours to build this fantasy devices.
An image search shows the armature is incredibly common, as he stated. So probably everything else you wrote is nonsense too, right?
Uhm... That rotor looks pretty standard, nothing fancy about it. Way to discredit yourself, even if you're probably right about the key parts.
@@abrahamedelstein4806 A generator rotor has 2, 4 or more poles. The poles can clearly be identified. They are straight and not ever slanted. Generators of this small size run at 1500 or 1800 rpm and hence have 2 poles. Neither is the produced power EVER taken off the slip rings or commutator.
For all the naysayers - this man is trying to keep his explanations in the simplest terms for you to understand. I found his methods very logical. Capture the full potential of a generator to create the most efficient system. It's all about finding and using a sort of wasted aspect of energy to increase efficiency. I thought he did a great job of explaining his methods and didn't make any outrageous claims whatsoever. To those who are accusing him of being a snake oil salesman I can only say - better to keep your mouth shut and be perceived as a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
Read my comment above, you will realise that he has created apparent efficiency by wasting far more power than he uses.
Hollywood4Fun
Well you've opened your mouth and revealed to all that you are an imbecile.
The true imbecile is Steve Gould who contributes nothing to the discussion other than his own arrogance. He would have been better off being perceived an idiot rather than opening his mouth to prove it.
At 12:06, he had input power of 475W and output power of 40W. (Without magnetic field input power is 130W. With magnetic field and without load input power is 432W.) So what would you conclude out of those measurements? "Let's not bore people with more measurements nor details"?
DING! We have a winner. It takes about ~500W to turn the contraption, another ~120W to energize the generator, and he gets a magical 40 f'ing watts out. Sure, it places far less drag on the rotor, but at 7% efficiency!
In my own modest way, I have been involved with inventions that disrupt the present way of doing things and have been frustrated for many years by most of the establishment's unwillingness to even consider let alone trial despite obvious demonstratable advantages... I take my hat off to this gentleman and his perseverance.
Why would they care? You font make money with efficiency.
All these theories and inventions happened long ago.
With a fraction of the coil, you get a fraction of the resistance... but also a fraction of the output... don't mind the hum of enormous energy consumption... look at the light bulbs!
The title should be "moderate efficiencies of electromagnetic coils which could potentially with a lot of investment reduce you electricity bill by a couple of dollars"
+frase2901 well said. lol
+Simply Joe
Yup ... I hate misleading titles ... granted, I clicked on the video already knowing that it was total bullshit XD
Totally disagree.
A decent cpu 800 mhz could swich off the back emf through capacitor banks to rebound voltage loss from the line and cut back emf. But no one does it because cpus are expensive...50 years ago.
Something like this for a 6 pole dc motor could be fabbed up using current tech and mass produced pretty inevpensively(20 bucks?).
That 20 bucks of plug and play tech could add 30% more range to your power wheels. Is it worth it?
For a hundred years we used incandescent lights. Now we use LEDs the power is not free. But we need to use less of it.
Recovering back emf or mitigating it's effect is a novel idea.
Watching this video reminds me that I need to study more pulse width an phase modulation circuitry.
The magic of 3,6,9 that Tesla refers to suits this machine exactly. That elliptical rotor is the magic key. Well done!
"can and will quite literally change the world overnight." Four years later and still waiting!
Hahahahahaha
read about the struggle Tesla other inventors faced who were shut out, then robbed, and because of their brilliance their ideas were never used or only applied much later. Many innovations sit unused because "industry" refuses to change and humans are lazy.
great demonstration on how making the reactive power to useful power
the thing that surprised me is how a pure resistor creates reactive power shown by the wattmeter which is called negative power
but as we all studied that voltage and current have 0 phase angle between them so no reactive power created but this contradicts what the
measuring equipment shows which is quite amazing
this useful as a large scale say a factory with huge motors that will reduce utility bill .
great power comes with great minds
to better serve humanity progress.
I pray that he find more money than need. And more important the most honest and fair partners that he realy deserve
From Québec Canada.
I can't understand the hate in these skeptics! if you don't believe in this man's creation you can simply go to another TH-cam video. why they have to call this hard working man delusional or any other offensive terms? Let him be I personally think that even if this work ain't 100% functional there's no reason to such childish hatred.
+hsbr00m Ya, I would tend to agree - but - this clown is looking for money through gofundme. That is the reason these types of SCAM videos ought to be banned from youtube. Along with the fraudulent QEG, being hawked by the Fix The World crook group, and the SEG, John Searl's phony baloney machine. Not one ounce of truth in any of those videos.
+Quantum Leap ok but that makes him no different from those big corporation funds raisers or charity who said are ending world poverty and still there's a lot of poor people in this world. If people are being deceived by him is their own money, they aren't obligated to do so. All I'm saying is if you don't believe him then cool, but at least they should be respectful with their disagreement. (excuse my english)
+Quantum Leap it isn't a scam. He isn't promising anything. A scam is when you ask for money to build something then you just take the money and disappear.
+ophello You ignoring the big old donate button in the video description?
+ophello Absolutely it's a scam. He's asking for money in order to write a book, a book that will generate sales and profits. A book that will be like all the shit books Aaron whats his face has for sale. Good for nothing, no useable info, just hokum bullshit, with just enough technical buzzwords thrown it to make it look legit.
"I'm not going to go into the details." Of course not...
And that's why most think it's BS, until he ends up dead, like 99% of inventors of big things.
@@4Everlast WTF are you talking about and why?
@@4Everlast there's no such thing as a free lunch when it comes to energy.
Don't let these con men fool you!
@@davidpetker8475 alright first off what's your circuit?
@@davidpetker8475 i'm an engineering student and i'm not really sure what an "energy pump" is but i'd skip out talking to inventors (especially ones like the guy in this video) and speak to some engineers, nobody will be able to understand it better. Get them to characterize it and produce a datasheet of it so people can start designing for it.
If you're onto something, i guess i'll be hearing a lot more about you in the future. But don't be surprised if it turns out to be nothing. You've probably just not accounted for something.
For anyone still saying this is BS, take a closer look at Kirchhoff's Second Law and take note of what the Back-EMF in the motor windings is actually doing, once you figure it out you realize all motors are at a base level 200% efficient minus the other losses, the voltage of the CEMF is neither lost or an abstraction, if it was an abstraction it wouldn't be capable doing real work in the form of CEMF, it's under-unity only because that voltage is *rising* in the opposite direction as a result of the motors generator function being activated by the induction of supplied power.
E[a] - E[c] = E[e]: 100% - conventional losses.
But if we change that to
E[a] + E[c] = E[e]: 200% - conventional losses.
Mechanical energy output / Electrical Energy Input = Efficiency
Example: 634 Watts / 746 Watts x 100 = 85%
Mechanical energy output / *Effective* Energy Input = Efficiency
Example: 634 Watts / 373 Watts x 100 = 170%
Take a look at Tesla's patent 390,414 where Tesla states numerous times the coils are in "one or more pairs" and "independently energized" and ufopolitics's asymmetrical motors based on the info in that patent. Continuous Current (DC) with 0 time change won't work.
It seems, at first look, this is simply a method of controlling reactance. At 0 Reactance (0 pf), the VA equals the Watts. Unfortunately, running a system a 0pf is not really possible because of the demands of the circuit connected to it. Resistance and Capacitance of circuits determine the amount of reactance applied by generator controls at the outlet. In most power generators, lagging reactance is usual because of the nature of the system.It is rare to run leading reactance and not really possible to run 0 VARs. Eddy currents become unstable. Certain areas of the generator become overheated. I ran utility generator systems and control circuits for generating stations for many years; In our systems running a zero pf was not possible, I need to watch this video again, as I have been retired for over 20 years and probably am a little rusty. Anyway, a very interesting video; thanks for posting it.
When Power factor is 0 then VA is equal to VAr and a PF of 1 is VA equal to Watts. An generator has an AVR that control Reactive power to regulate voltage. A synchronous generator that only supplies/consumes reactive power is known as a synchronous condenser. They are pretty common. Same function as STATCOM and SVC.
The guy in the video is a fraud. He uses jargon out of context. Rotating machines are older than ICE. Some would say our knowledge of the field of rotating electrical machines has reached a limit or is saturated(pun intended). No new innovation is made on the magnetic circuit side of motors only small incremental improvements.
Fantastic breakdown of what hes really doing. As commets have said his high tech has been around for damn near 100 years. Most modern motor/generators already use a bias cut rotor usually made of of thin plates to minimize histerisis (spelling? ), from a single giant chunk of steel.
He is still trying to find out why all his wrist-watches are broken..... MarkMannM2
Electrric motors do get very hot, which is not due to friction at the bearings. The back emf is what makes old electric motors so inefficient and expensive to run. Recapturing this back emf and re-using it is certainly the future of electric motors. If power companies didn't penalise you for doing this, all domestic electric motors would now be using these systems. Please understand that it is only converting the wasted heat to electricity, not creating more electricity than goes in. Impressive research!
Phil Busby exactly and what’s even actually crazy is that the physics world doesn’t measure this energy of induced emf / CEMF instead it just side steps it.
It is what it is haha sad to say!
The actual reason motors get hot is the I-squared times resistance power applied to the windings.If the back
emf were to be reduced more current would flow through the windings at any rpm and power in those
windings would still heat the motor. The only way one could reduce the power heating the motor would be to lower the resistance of the wires used. I don't believe that one could capture the back e.m.f. and have useful energy.
If motor windings don’t produce heat then how does your toaster, lightbulbs and everything else work
The heat generated by the windings of a 50 HP compound DC Motor is of a minimal value, dissipated with a fan would not produce enough energy to heat water for a cup of tea.
Actually that's a complete crock, all motors under load will have to shed heat. I work on pumps, drive motors, fan motors. Motors hooked to pumps, motors hooked to blades, motors hooked to gears and motors hooked to belts.
If you really want to be inefficient about it, add another pump, spend a lot of money to run plumbing around the motor, suck off the waste heat using more electricity to move the pump and extract the heat with liquid. Pay the plumber to hook it up and fix it when it leaks. When it leaks and ruins your pump and it's electronics you can pay to fix that too.
Thing that people never understand, if your idea was more efficient AND therefore cheaper, they'd be doing it already in a massive way. But it's not so they don't. You have to pay the plumber who has to buy gas to come fix what I just described to you. That's an inefficiency you never planned for eh?
It's one I see every day.
"Real power = Volt * current * cos ( angle degrees )" while "apparent power = Volts * current * sin( angle degrees )" . The degrees angle is the power factor, the power factor being the phase angle alteration created as a result of the electrical load altering the phase angle between voltage and current. The inductive load current leads, but a capacitive load voltage leads. The reason why the power factor is phase corrected at the electrical load connection, is to keep in phase the current and voltage as far as the power company is concerned in synch. If the power factor is kept near to unity, "Cos(90) = 1", so the losses sin(90) = 0, the power loss within the apparent power is near zero, so the power company is not thus generating power into a loss load, namely the apparent power requirement.
Let's see: the major losses in any electrical machine (that is, any motor or generator) are due to resistance heating of the field and armature coils by the field and armature currents, respectively, plus resistance heating in the iron cores, which are by their nature conductive. We can lower the copper resistance losses by changing the size and shape of the conductors. As for the iron, about the only thing we can do is use cores built of thin laminations of iron that are electrically insulated from one another, which prevents most of the current from circulating through the cores and heating them.
Added to these losses are hysteresis losses, which result from the iron's magnetic field being constantly reversed. These have been gradually reduced over the years as magnetic materials have improved. The latest developments have been in something called 'amorphous' iron, where the metal is cooled so quickly that it cannot form crystals.
In large utility generators we also must deal with losses due to bearing heating and from the compression of air between the closely-spaced rotor and stator. The former has been minimized by air or steam-suspended bearings in which there's no metal-to-metal contact and thus essentially no friction, and the latter was cured by making the generator gas-tight and flooding it with hydrogen gas, which is vastly more 'slippery' than is air.
Now, all these improvements were made at least fifty years ago, and there are likely others, but the efficiency of steam turbogenerator plants has come about as close to the theoretical thermodynamic maximum efficiency of 50% that they're likely to get. Further economies will come from extracting more and more heat from exhaust gases, and that's being done with 'co-generation.'
Now, when you crank a generator by hand and suddenly add an additional electrical load--say, by screwing in a light bulb--you will instantly feel that the generator has gotten lots harder to crank. That, however, is simply conservation of energy--that is, the energy to light the light bulb must come from somewhere, and where it comes from in this case is from whomever is turning the crank. There is no way to alter this--it's one of our basic physical laws--and we wouldn't want to do so.
As it stands right now, and likely always will, is: energy output = energy input + system losses.
Mark Kinsler
I was looking but still there is no answer. You seem very knowledgeable. What powers the atom itself? Any atom. Atoms have electrons, which have a mass and a charge, and they move close to the speed of light, on their specific orbits, creating the electromagnetic field. What powers them for billions of years? What gives them the energy, to not only have electrons orbiting, but a nucleus vibrating|? Where is the energy input?
We can do similar things - speed particles close to the light velocity - in the linear accelerator, or the SEM microscope(with the electrons specifically), but it requires huge amounts of energy.
@@trevorphillips4595 Well, at absolute zero all atomic motion ceases, if that's of any help. Note that most of us envision a 'model' of the atom first offered by Neils Bohr around 1940, but things have progressed since then. While the Bohr model is very convenient to use, there's a lot counter-intuitive stuff from quantum theory that must also be considered, and it turns our neat electrons-orbiting-the-nucleus into a soupy mess.
About the only good answer to your concerns lies in the laws of thermodynamics which, as far as anyone has been able to determine, can't be violated. Thermodynamics is a very important and quite interesting field to study, but it can be difficult to learn unless the student is willing to give up the pre-conceived notions we all possess and start off on the presumption that he knows nothing.
The study of thermodynamics is far more interesting and fruitful than any search for free energy.
@@trevorphillips4595 Its like a game of pool. The pool balls dont generate energy, they are just crashing into one another at the moment. We are a fraction of a billionth of a second into the initial breaking of the pool balls. Their energy will convert into subatomic particles spread across the void.
SO....
Atoms are reacting to other atoms. The energy is constantly transferring between atoms in a massive soup of energy. There are areas of lower energy (cold) and higher energy (hot). The electrons are basically without mass and have no thermal losses... but they do break apart into quasiparticles. Even photons break down and are reassembled... just energy transfer. There are losses for sure, but those losses are thermal or how fast the atom as a whole is vibrating/moving.
Eventually, the energy contained in the motion of the protons neutrons, will break down into other subatomic particles and the Bose-Einstein condensate wave of those particles will continue breaking down until an even distribution of energy is spread so thin throughout the universe, that there is more void than anything measurable. Since it is believed the universe is accelerating at expanding, the energy will eventually become so dispersed, there are no clumps anywhere. Absolute entropy... yet, I suspect, on the micro scale, deep within the layers of the subatomic realms, there will still remain an incredible amount of energy if your frame of reference were small enough. Even a single quark would be the size of the galaxy if you were the size of 5 planck units.
I watched this for a second time and really improved my hi frequency resonance non magnetic non profit project . thank you for not charging for this information this is the most valuable video out there hands down
Nice demonstration. But there is still more power going in than coming out.
No unless you have made one I would not say it does not it's just the way the fields are tripped and restarts to get feed backs up to 4 amperes of power extra .a door bell solenoid can spark doing a rapid pulse to induce a higher voltage rapidly pulsating with synchronizing field too field .
@@danielash1704 I have made 2 different versions and am still trying to break the laws of thermodynamics. Until that is achieved you will not produce a system with 100% efficiency
@@off-gridhillbillystyle3735 film and put them on TH-cam, I'm very interested and would like to see what you've made and done... Also it's just not thermaldynamics at play bud, there's much more. Also, there's been a bunch of papers and work that states theoretically you can damn near get to 100% if not totally, depends on the environment, temp, different gravity, ect. Hell not only are they still finding out that Einstein's theories were correct that he wrote theororized, black hole that they found now working on white holes. Next, theirs a ton of stuff that they still can't get to work of Tesla's, even when they believe it's made correct. A lot of his designs are known and proven to have worked by other scientists of the day testing and learning about them. Basically, what I'm trying to say to, is just because you've ONLY built 2 of the devices and haven't even gotten close to the "Golden" 100% efficiency, (which I don't believe is possible but getting very close to it I very much believe it's capable) get back in your workshop or lab and build another one. Keep building them trying each time to improve on it 💪!
@@offyouselfsbuddy1683 that my plan brother. And yes your right there's many issues at play. Breaking them is my goal. And I believe I can do it. Just got to get back into my workshop
8
Funny how TH-cam is always jammed full of free energy videos with whiz-bang generators built by genius garage tinkerers. Even so, none of these geniuses has ever built a large-scale generator to replace their power company. Seems like a logical first step if any of this really works.
These things take money to scale up. Also, you have investors that have billions if not trillions of dollars invested in the old ways of doing things who would lose money should these cheaper or even almost free energy devices appear on the market.
Utility bills aren't free either. If I had free energy tech, I'd at least build something big enough to run an outbuilding, or an arc welder or a bug-out RV. But all that any of these guys can manage is to run a few light bulbs. It says something about these "technologies." Either they're impractical, or they're hoaxes. Nobody goes from proof of concept to venture funding. You have to build a working prototype before any savvy investor will touch you. I'm calling BS.
@@drsnooz8112 He has stated that he doesn't have the money to scale these devices up which leaves him in the same situation as Nikola Tesla who also lacked the funds to build anything useful for society because of cost and the fact his investors pulled out. The only thing that Tesla produced along with Westinghouse was AC current.
You said it was a 300w lamp, when you turn the lamp off you had 60v on the non resistanced circuit, when you turned the lamp on you had a voltage drop of 45v.
So you have your resistanced circuit or lamp tied in parallel with the transformer.
That's a hard voltage drop for just 300w.
People are watching this because they are interested in the details you keep saying we dont wanna hear
Well as you have pointed out, any details or firm statements are open to PEER REVIEW and the possibility of DISPROVING them. However vague/impossible claims are easy if you just wave your hands around.
People with socks and sandals are always brilliant
Not very insighted. Maybe they have ugly feet. Or super sweaty feet and need socks an open air. Some brilliant people don't wear socks or shoes. It's called earthing. Your rubber soles and socks are disconnected from natural earth healing energy.
no where in this video did i multiply power by 5000 percent..... change your title for the video
you**
A magician doesn't tell you upfront that his hat doesn't really produce rabbits. A man selling magic beans doesn't tell you they are not magical. A con artist doesn't tell you he is a con artist. I don't expect the title to get changed
Have we spotted the crackpot?
Tony Barber feel better?
Well then he needs to quit be fucking greedy and get in touch with dr. Greer and and get this shit out to humanity for free....the time is now....
In all of the machines here, this man is either removing back emf or using it to improve the efficiency of the devices.
The simplest way I have come across for removing back emf is in a water pump and wheel turning a generator.
When a load is applied to the generator there is no effect on the water pump.
Dear Sir. Don't give up, many don't like you, they know that they may lose money---
...what the fuck?
Is it any coincidence that the elliptical rotor in these generators resembles common lissajous patterns found when two frequencies are mixed together at certain wavelengths?
good observation, it seems to be doing just that.. thanks rat lord.!!
It's amazing how the universe gives us suttle truths about the operations of our universe... kinda like "Why does the sun rotate?"
The sun's rotations make the rotation of our planet and everything else that orbits our sun. Obviously, the black hole at the center of our galaxy is what our sun orbits, and therefore rotates it.
But, what about the black hole? Why is that rotating?
Isn't it strange?
What if... our black hole is actually a heat source. One that is so hot, it produces no color and cannot be read. So, it's not that "light cannot escape" it's more like "Light is part of it's fuel"
As light is emitted, inwards, it creates it's spin, sucking in it's surroundings, growing more, as it's fuel.
Eventually, It will slow, and cool down a little, becoming a massive star, much like our sun, but obviously much bigger as it begins it's actual light.
What creates a black hole?
What if a large mass of Protons gathered here, and is now taking in a lot of Neutrons, adding more and more as it pulls suns and stars into it.
william vaughn What does your dissertation have to do with the subject being presented?
I'm sure he's thought of this, but there's energy in that wobble frequency he's observed in the experiment with the eliptical, I wonder if it would be worth trying to scavenge the loss, instead of absorbing it...or is it more efficient to balance the eliptical to counter the loss? I have to stop now, or I'll be up all night thinking about this.
dual rotors should counter balance ...
It doesn't take all-night to work out that this is all bullshit.
Electrician here. There's a lot to dig onto here, and some of it is over the fence of my knowledge, but all the parts that I can fully understand make total sense. And in fact he's not claiming free energy but energy efficiency !
12:55 _So I don't want to get into too much detail,_
*Goes into too much detail*
It's annoying when you find yourself not having the knowledge to understand what you are demonstrating, I have some , but it falls short. I'm going to need to see this video a few times I think 😔
I think you are not alone, I might have to watch it a few hundred times
if he can build a working model with practical applications that shows the advantages, that would be very helpful.
@Paul Day If he had a work model, he wouldn't need donations. He could just multiply the grid power and sell it back for a profit. THe guy is attacking the problem from the wrong side. ELectric motors are already ~95% efficient. THe loses come when converting thermal energy to turn the generator. Better ways to turn a generator is what we need. Not better generators.
He can't.
@@bloccoaspirale1867 beat me to it
description: "This technology and information can and will quite literally change the world overnight"
Me: Now watching this in 2022 and have never heard of it.
Supposedly, this guy has been working with electricity his whole life. But he called a power meter a "watt meter." Watt is the unit for power. He also called a multimeter the wrong name. And He is unaware that ferrous metals are an excellent conductor of electromagnetic force and air is a terrible conductor of the same. This threw up some red flags for me.
Do you know why you can't get a perpetual motion machine? The second and third laws of thermodynamics. If there are no parasite losses from friction or vibration. There will certainly be some because his dynaflux motor need to be counterbalanced, to compensate for the shape and it's rotation. A perpetual motions machine is a closed system. So why do they all need to be started? Shouldn't they all just self start?
A light bulb is basically a dead short in a partial vacuum so light is produced instead of just heat. but the readings changed according to which type of dead short the electricity was passed across. That should not be happening as a coiled filament in a light bulb has only a minimal resistance increase, as opposed to a dead short. It's so small that it wouldn't be more than a tenth of an ohm.
And I am not an Engineer or an Electrician or Electronics tech. But I can do the math and I can tell you that E over R equals I and that formula never fails. Another way to write that is E= I(R+r) Show me the math and I will believe that instead of a video.
Just so you know the education I received in Electronics and Electricity was al taught to me by Electrical Engineers, Electricians; Electronics and Avionics techs at work, who educated me far more than they knew. I was the maintenance man and janitor
Also, genius and insanity often inhabit the same mind Nikola Tesla was an Obsessive-Compulsive, and a Brilliant inventor. Con artists like to use him to give their useless or impossible claims credibility, because he was so very hard to understand for people of normal intelligence that it gave an almost mystical quality to his genius.
I am not telling anybody what to do. I am giving you my reasons to exercise caution, and why I wouldn't invest, even for a percentage of the invention. Do you know how much the companies that build portable generators would pay to get hold of a generator that used less gasoline? you could use it as a back up or for a camping cabin, RV, or off the grid cabin usage. The US military would love to get hold of something like that. They would fly off the shelves as fast as they could build them and the Electric companies couldn't do shit about it either. I just doubt it is more than a con job for easy money, or he would already be marketing it that way. Simple common sense if the door is locked try another, or climb through a window. An invention not in production doesn't make the inventor any money. I know what it means to make sacrifices, all I need is "patent pending" and banks will loan me all the money my credit will stand. Why isn't he going that route?
I would tread very carefully here, with giving this man money. I raised the just under $14,000 dollars it took for the engineering and to get an invention in the patent process. It took me 12 years, but I did it. It was almost all my own money too. My cousin and my best friend each bought a percentage according to how much they could afford to lose. Also I have seen Jim Murry on TH-cam before, demonstrating different inventions with the same equipment and in the same shop if my memory is correct.
Perpetual machines need a starting force to begin the cycle. There is a cool experiment you can do with a funnel, a tube and some water that will create a perpetual motion but it needs a force generated from pouring water in to start it. I'm not saying his machine is legit but I don't think that alone is a reason to write it off as a scam.
@@Infiernofox138 If that was the only reason I gave you, then you would have a point.
But being nearly normal in intelligence you failed to grasp the significance of that statement. I Understood it when My 4th grade teacher, Mr. Arnold, said it to me. "You have a machine that rotates endlessly but does no work and produces nothing."
now if you will, address the other complex physics principles I put on simple terms, as objections, or the rhetorical question I asked about marketing a generator.
I have shown you respect by restraining myself from calling you names, therefore I insist you do the same with me.
@@dwdesvoigne5988 Yikes. If you have to restrain yourself from name-calling over me clarifying your perception of perpetual machines then I'd suggest taking some shrooms to get a handle on the things that are causing you to suffer in life. I didn't say it was the only reason you gave. I was simply implying that you should look more into them if you think they're a reason to write this off as a scam. I believe he was using part of the machine as a perpetual motion machine to simply reduce load from the generator. I didn't hear him claim free energy from the machine outside of simply making the generator more efficient but I may have missed it if he did. I was under the impression that he was claiming a major reduction in the parasitic drag that is created by the emf fields by keeping them from conflicting with each other as the generator rotates. Is this incorrect?
@@Infiernofox138 I did and that is why I wrote what I wrote. Your underestimation of both my intelligence and knowledge is quite frankly, very insulting. And here you are being insulting again.
A perpetual motion machine is not impossible, but creating a machine that can do more than merely move is impossible. Even then, the supposed perpetual motions machines I have seen take an input of mechanical energy to start them. They do not turn forever, but instead through leverage or fluid dynamics turn for a prolonged period of time until the initial force used to start them is consumed. What part of this is it you failed to grasp on your own?
Any machine actually capable of producing more energy that it consumes would self start and the challenge would be how to keep it from running all the time. That is just simple common sense, coupled with a uneducated mechanics knowledge of machinery. I was working fixing machinery since I was 10 to help support my Mother and brothers and sisters.
Electricity is the least efficient way to make a perpetual motion machine, because it takes displacing electrons from their atomic orbit around the nucleus of the atom. That only words on ions which have extra electrons in orbit. To get the displacement you have to first create an ion then use another electron to displace one of the electrons in the outer shell which can only be done when the outer shell is full. That is why electricity is inherently inefficient and the transmission of DC current is limited to about 2 1/2 miles through wires. AC current is better but it takes 10 times the energy to get the current to your house from the generation plant, than what you use in the same time period. Since you didn't get what I wrote about before, I will assume you won't get this connection either.
Think about all those loops of copper wire inside a motor, an alternator or a generator, and since they are wired in series the electricity has to travel through multiple loops. Parallel would be more efficient, but the electricity still would move a long distance. Are you beginning to understand the connection? The distance the electricity travels inside those devices eats up energy before a magnetic field is even generated, so a motor take more electricity to generate less mechanical force and a generator takes more mechanical force to generate less electrical energy.
Eventually I did go to college and completed a 4 year degree in 3 1/2 years because I knew how to work hard to get what I wanted. It's more about hard work and giving the professors what they want, than intelligence. And if you STILL DON"T UNDERSTAND THEN...
You need to educate yourself and there are many good engineering channels on TH-cam that will give you the information you need.
I am not your parent, nor am I your teacher, nor are you my employee who I am trying to train, so I get nothing out of this and a small amount of respect for trying to help you is not too much to ask. I made the same mistake you are making, but it still angers me when I am on the receiving end of that kind of arrogance. I don't have to help you and I don't owe you any answers, nor do I care what an anonymous person on TH-cam thinks. So think about this what do I get out of this conversation? What is in it for me? Put yourself in my shoes for just a minute and then treat me like you would like to be treated if the roles were reversed. Would you like me to be as rude back to you, as I feel you are being to me? Which was what my name calling comment was all about. I was arrogant once too and it really made me mad when people pointed it out. You need to dial it back and you will get better results with people.
@@dwdesvoigne5988 Damn, bro. You're a clown. You're making assumptions and getting triggered over nothing while completely missing what I actually said. Makes sense why you got defensive over a civil comment. Go outside. Get healthy. Explore the world. Just get the fuck off comment threads for a bit. You can't see how broken you are until you do.
Your not boring us to death buddy. Keep it going. Put it at its max
Turns those knobs a little higher... higher... and higher. ;D
I always knew there are aliens among us.... this guy is one of them. hehe
Give this man a lifetime achievement award already, he's been working on it for over 40 years!
@@BillAnt I agree! unfortunatley the government loves smart ideas and hates smart people
@@clrwtrmusic Serious question- what do you honestly believe has been accomplished in this video? What miracle will "quite literally change the world overnight"? The man in the video may very well be intelligent, but there is nothing extraordinary happening. He's not creating energy, which he said so himself. He's not getting more energy out than what is being used. He's not putting in 100 watts and getting 110 watts out, for example. What he is demonstrating is simply how efficiently you can generate power.
Power factor is as old as electricity. It's basically something like this- if I burn X amount of fuel and get Y amount of watts, a low PF means you'll use more fuel to do the same amount of work. Y doesn't increase. You don't get more watts than before, you just burn less fuel. It's about efficiency. Think about this- low PF: using 100 watts of mechanical energy to produce 80 watts of electrical energy. High PF: using 90 watts of mechanical energy to produce the same 80 watts of electrical energy. The output is still less than the input. It's pretty much like fuel mileage. If you use a 1000 hp engine to drive 60 mph it's going to use more gas than a 100 hp engine in the same car going 60 mph.
It doesn't matter what you do, you will never reach even 100% efficiency. There are always losses. Friction isn't something you can overcome. Back to the car analogy, your engine may make 100 hp at the crankshaft, but due to losses in the driveline, the actual power measured at the tire will be less, say 90 hp. The video is attempting to shrink that loss to its lowest possible point, so instead of losing 10 hp, you only lose 6 hp. You will never be able to say- "the engine is making 100 hp at the flywheel, but 120 hp at the wheels.
@@pamike4873 yeah, because that would violate the first law of thermodynamics.
That's all you had to say
Not going to pretend I understand most of this but it is still very interesting. Question is what is the practical application of each device?
TO PRODUCE EXTREMELY HIGH EFFICENCY MOTORS AND ELECTRONICS. SIMILAR TO SUPERIOR GAS MILAGE OR BETTER ENERGY DELIVERING SOURCE.
CONSIDER NUTRITION AS A WAY TO UNDERSTAND THIS. pROTIEN IN FOOD CONVERTS INTO ATP WHICH DELIVERS ENERGY TO OUR CELLS. ENERGY CREATES MOTION MOTION ENABLES ACTIVITY AND ACTIVITY RESHAPESMATERIAL MASS IN OUR ENVIRONMENT LIKE TAKING IRON FROM ROCKS AND TURNING IT INTO STEEL THAT'S TURNED INTO MANY THINGS LIKE THE BARREL OF A SHOTGUN OR THE SUPPORT BEAMSIN A SKY SCRAPER OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NUCLEAR SUBMARINE OR A HIGH QUALITY KITCHEN THINK...OPPS SINK.
There isn't a practical application, which is why none of it is in use anywhere.
I think if you enclose the elliptical in a cylinder , then inclose in a water jacket and a one way fitting and attach fitting and you got a water pump with pvc pipe to create compresed air to run anything off of it while generating electricity at the same time. Virtually no resistance and Flux lines go thru water. Its magnatizem.
Hey there ya go. 🤠
Like you, I spent many decades in heavy industry (a steel mill), working on all sorts of electromechanical equipment. Since much of it was very old, there were a lot of DC machines. Obviously later on, most of it became AC machines.
I suggest that the value of your presentation would be increased by setting the hook so to speak with hard evidence which could be followed up with an analysis of benefits. As an example, we all know that 746 watts in the armature of a conventional DC motor will produce 1 HP (550 Ft/lb/sec or 33000 ft/lb/minutes). One hook would be, if you demonstrated the generation of 1 hp with significantly less than 746 watts of armature power (to justify the additional complexity and therefore capital expense).
In the AC realm, we all know that optimizing power factor is beneficial, those of us who have tried it however, quickly learn that there is the issue of diminishing returns (capital invested vs utility power saved). We also learn quickly that there are a lot of machines in a plant that will effect the power factor that is actually seen by the utility, so any approach is generally aimed at "low hanging fruit" (our hot mill was 80,000 HP & a typical tandem rolling mill was 40,000 HP).
So in the AC world, another possible example of a beneficial presentation would be to contrast the expected cost over time to impliment and maintain this resonant approach to saving energy vs that of conventional power factor correctors that our sometimes used to that end.
In the tin plating of steel, it is necessary to flash melt the tin after it is plated to convert it from a milky surface appearance to the bright mirror like surface that you see on tin cans in the market place. This is done through RF induction heating systems of 500 - 800 KW. As such, they are similar to typical broadcasting systems. They are neither inexpesive or simple to operate and maintain. As you alluded to several times, solid state equipment can be vary useful, but all too often it can also be easily damaged and repairs are rarely simple and are always expensive. It would require huge systems like this to deal with any significant portion of an industrial system.
My expection is that it will be a difficult sell to combine additional solid state components to every motor system wherein there is a potential to initially save some operating expense. Like you, this field had been a significant part of my life so clearly I can appreciate the effort that you have expended. I too, have been down the road with the US Patent Office. As anyone who has been there will probably tell you, a patent isn't worth much until someone steals it and you win in court. This is not a fun process and I would not do under any circumstances!
Best Regards, I wish you well...
I was all on board till the 3rd or 4th paragraph when I realized how off topic you're thinking. You want potential industrial product line numbers and predictions yet its still in experimental phazes..are you even watching the same video or are you just not listening & paying attention?
@@twistednuts6062 he's being an ass, they're still developing a marketable product, but with the way we're fucked on the electrical grid due to its corporate nationalizing and regulations out the wazoo, they'll need to market it in a way that doesn't get them McAfee'd or kicked out of the states, so probably as a mod for existing generators for homes or something... possibly.....
I thought I was smart with all my military and civilian training. thank you Sir!!!!
Stop thinking that then ... the man knows nothing ...Its a con ..complete BS
@@markdoan1472 I've only analyzed the entirely electronic version, but I did it painful detail in my comment --.you are SO right. The parts with the motors made so little sense and showed so little information that I didn't even try to tackle them. Total nonsense, and I spent about 10 years developing drive systems for state of the art switched reluctance motors, and another 35+ years designing various electronic systems.
I love how much passion and experience he has, I’m 17 and have loved learning about alternative energy. This work is amazing
HE'S NUTZ!
Alternative energy is a pipe dream. It doesn't work within the current known laws of physics.
@@HVDynamo I agree with you but we need to go back in time and find out where it got changed what did they hide I'm open soon somebody will figure it out and I think maybe we have we just haven't put it together either
@@HVDynamo neither does quantum mechanics but it's been proven.
@@vincentrusso4332 Also - Santa Claus is real because quantum mechanics is counter-intuitive.
6 years and still not mainstream news? can't help thinking there's some fatal flaw here