I’m about to discuss my results of my first PhD paper, I must admit this video highlighted the most significant aspects I should focus on. Thanks 🙏🏾 for making this video.
amazing!! doctor... such a great video made me to be easier for writing my first medical research thx you. The key that i mostly appreciated is the discussion matrix..very useful
Thank you so much Dr. Jia ... this is just such invaluable information .. I was so lost and struggling with discussion writing .. please keep mentoring and keep sharing .. more power to you :)
I think my research team gives me the most complicated part of our research , the discussion! Not fair to do this all alone 🙄 + Thanks for ur clarification ☻♥!
Yes, discussion is the most difficult part for me too. It requires the most amount of thinking. When your research team assigns you the discussion section, it could be a sign that they trust your critical thinking skill the most. :)
When we talk about interpretation of the results, we give meaning to the numbers. e.g., the data shows - 60% in group A. Now, you interpret it by giving context. What does the 60% mean? Is it bigger than the other group? Smaller than the other group. Is that an increasing trend? Decreasing trend? The interpretation is still based on the objective data. We are not giving any opinion about it. Once we give our opinion - it goes into the discussion section. I hope this clarifies your question.
Thank you as I was struggling with this section in paper writing. I have a question: Should the works of the authors mentioned in the condordant and discordant paragraphs be cited in the literature review, before referring to their works in the discussion section or can you just compare findings with other authors without having mentioned their work in the literature section?
I am assuming you are talking about literature review section of the PHD thesis, because in research papers, there is no "literature section" per se. In your case, you can mention the authors straight in the discussion section without mentioning them in the literature section IF the reference is not relevant in the literature section. Think about it this way - the literature review section of the thesis is to justify why you want to do the research. But the discussion is more to talk about how your findings fit into the current literature. There are some papers that would be relevant in both the lit review section AND the discussion section, and some only in the discussion section.
@PublishedMD Yes, Dr Jia, I want to ask that sometimes we have so many results to discuss, and so many points are there to be justified which leads to a comprehensive discussion (4~5 pages), so is it fine to have a long discussion in a research paper?
Such an insightful video. You have simplified complex stuffs as much as possible. Please do post on how to write a research paper as in Nature Journal standard
Thank you for the explanation. I'm writing my discussion for my masters thesis and was a bit lost on how to approach this section. Do you have advice for discussions of scoping reviews?
What would change to the above advice if your paper was on something completely novel? As in, no one else has done it or anything broadly similar. I am having that conundrum currently ans cannot compare my results to anyone because I'm doing something entirely novel in nature. Great video by the way, it was succinct and helpful.
Hi, this is an excellent question. The key to publishing research papers is that you need to be talking about "something new on something old". If you are not referencing your argument based on any previous work, the reviewers will say that there is "no scientific basis". If you can't find anything within your niche, then look outside of the niche. If there is nothing within that field, look outside of the field. YOu could also transcend from clinical evidence to basic science evidence. FOr example, if I do not have any evidence from the clinical outcomes, I will use animal data, or biochemical data to support my arguments.
Hey , I just watched your video and I must say that it was really informative and well-made. I was wondering if I could help you edit your videos and also highly engaging thumbnails as well that helps to grow your channel fastly ?
Hi, can you clarify what you mean? I will try my best to answer you. Do you mean that you got the "Method Section" done, but don't know how to write the "Discussion Section"? Or do you mean that after watching the video on Discussion Section, you still have no clue on what to do next?
It's so refreshing to find these types of videos where the person speaks like they're actually alive
Thanks for watching!
THIS IS BY FAR THE BEST DISCUSSION SECTION VIDEO EVERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!! Thank you.
Thanks!
Really,one of the best explanation on discussion writting .
I’m about to discuss my results of my first PhD paper, I must admit this video highlighted the most significant aspects I should focus on. Thanks 🙏🏾 for making this video.
Thank you.... Ive got to do my discussion in one day...... Wish me luck.
I cannot imagine this video being any better. This was fantastic, structured, clear and so helpful, thank you so much
they discussed the discussion very well lol
Thank you. Your discussion matrix is just what I need. Honestly, this should be in some sort of research paper.
My pleasure! I got the matrix idea from Patricia GOodson's "book "Being an Academic Writer".
This video made the discussion section way easy to understand and write for me. Thanks u very much.
The best explanation about discussion !!!
Great, you nailed it! Especially, the discussion matrix is a great hint!
Great advice, thank you :) Currently working on an academic manuscript for my masters program. Definitely adopting your discussion matrix!
That's wonderful!
amazing!! doctor... such a great video made me to be easier for writing my first medical research thx you. The key that i mostly appreciated is the discussion matrix..very useful
Anytime! I am glad you found this useful
Thank you so much Dr. Jia ... this is just such invaluable information .. I was so lost and struggling with discussion writing .. please keep mentoring and keep sharing .. more power to you :)
This is exactly what Iwas looking for, thanks!
This is so useful.
Thank you.
Appreciate it.
Excellent video! Definitely helping with my first dissertation paper..thank you!
Thanks! Do have have other writing struggles? I would love to make a video to address that.
I think my research team gives me the most complicated part of our research , the discussion!
Not fair to do this all alone 🙄
+ Thanks for ur clarification ☻♥!
Yes, discussion is the most difficult part for me too. It requires the most amount of thinking.
When your research team assigns you the discussion section, it could be a sign that they trust your critical thinking skill the most. :)
@ haha omg thanks
I’m gonna try this way of thinking ♥(*^ω^*)♥
Thank you so much. I'm working on a mini-report and master thesis. Gonna use our matrix!
Thank you so much! Writing the discussion of my master thesis at the moment and will definitely use all of your tips !
Brilliant tips! Love your writing tips from Bangladesh... Inshallah, I will apply in my research paper.
Wonderful! I am glad it is helpful.
Hi can u help guide how to write the discussion of a case report
Thanks a lot ❤❤❤❤
Hi, where is interpretation of the result comes
When we talk about interpretation of the results, we give meaning to the numbers.
e.g., the data shows - 60% in group A. Now, you interpret it by giving context. What does the 60% mean? Is it bigger than the other group? Smaller than the other group. Is that an increasing trend? Decreasing trend?
The interpretation is still based on the objective data. We are not giving any opinion about it. Once we give our opinion - it goes into the discussion section.
I hope this clarifies your question.
Insightful session! Thanks
Thank you as I was struggling with this section in paper writing. I have a question: Should the works of the authors mentioned in the condordant and discordant paragraphs be cited in the literature review, before referring to their works in the discussion section or can you just compare findings with other authors without having mentioned their work in the literature section?
I am assuming you are talking about literature review section of the PHD thesis, because in research papers, there is no "literature section" per se.
In your case, you can mention the authors straight in the discussion section without mentioning them in the literature section IF the reference is not relevant in the literature section.
Think about it this way - the literature review section of the thesis is to justify why you want to do the research. But the discussion is more to talk about how your findings fit into the current literature. There are some papers that would be relevant in both the lit review section AND the discussion section, and some only in the discussion section.
This is amazing. Thank you. I was suffering!
I am going to start working on my discussion matrix.
Amazing! Thank you so much!
thank u so much, please make more videos about writing papers
Thank you!
Absolutely clear explanation thank you so much
Can this matrix be used in a scoping review discussion?
Thanks for this awesome video!
very informative, thanks.
Thank you ma'am for guiding us in such a nice way :)
My pleasure 😊 You're welcome! Any other topics you are interested in?
@PublishedMD Yes, Dr Jia, I want to ask that sometimes we have so many results to discuss, and so many points are there to be justified which leads to a comprehensive discussion (4~5 pages), so is it fine to have a long discussion in a research paper?
Such an insightful video. You have simplified complex stuffs as much as possible. Please do post on how to write a research paper as in Nature Journal standard
Thank you so much 🙏🏽
Thank you for the explanation. I'm writing my discussion for my masters thesis and was a bit lost on how to approach this section. Do you have advice for discussions of scoping reviews?
Superstar video , very excellent ,
Thanks a lot! You're the best :)
Great job.
What would change to the above advice if your paper was on something completely novel? As in, no one else has done it or anything broadly similar. I am having that conundrum currently ans cannot compare my results to anyone because I'm doing something entirely novel in nature. Great video by the way, it was succinct and helpful.
Hi, this is an excellent question. The key to publishing research papers is that you need to be talking about "something new on something old". If you are not referencing your argument based on any previous work, the reviewers will say that there is "no scientific basis". If you can't find anything within your niche, then look outside of the niche. If there is nothing within that field, look outside of the field. YOu could also transcend from clinical evidence to basic science evidence. FOr example, if I do not have any evidence from the clinical outcomes, I will use animal data, or biochemical data to support my arguments.
Thank so much 😊
Thank you very much
good work
Hey , I just watched your video and I must say that it was really informative and well-made. I was wondering if I could help you edit your videos and also highly engaging thumbnails as well that helps to grow your channel fastly ?
Very good 🎉
Thanks for the kind comments. Are there any topics you are interested in?
I've got the method but no clue what to do 🙂
Hi, can you clarify what you mean? I will try my best to answer you.
Do you mean that you got the "Method Section" done, but don't know how to write the "Discussion Section"?
Or do you mean that after watching the video on Discussion Section, you still have no clue on what to do next?
Thank you
You're welcome! Any other topics you are interested in?
amazing :)
How many studies should you compare your study to?
Hey can i have your google scholar?
I want you to be my teacher
nice information
Thank you so much!
thank you
thank you so much
Thank you so much
thank you so much