You should make your thumbnail better in terms of marketting. You can't tell it's a Brian Lara interview. For example, make the title simple: "A Conversation With Brian Lara On Batting". That simple title would work a lot better than this. With the thumbnail instead of having a silhoutte of a batsman you can barely see who could be anybody, have a picture from the interview itself and add your picture too.
I agree,Jarrod is privileged enough to get interviews with these greats but not making most of it,look at grade cricketer,they put a photo of the person from the interview itself so people know it's a real new interview not an old one remodeled it should also be on his main channel,he's not getting views even with these greats so he should try it maybe next with whoever he gets on
its a shame, the interview was not the best. this is when i feel someone who heavily relies on stats and figures to justify a cricketers performance or how good he or she was really fails compared to the people who have played against or seen the cricketer. If you ask anyone who saw Sangakara or Kallis would know how good they are compared to lara, Sangakara was a great player so was Kallis but these guys didn't face the same attack or pressure that Brian Lara faced nor did they win test matches in the way Lara did. Kallis was lucky to be in a team with so many gifted players and all-rounds and Sangakara was like to play with Jayawardena, jayasuria, dilshan, tharanga, hasan tilikaratna. But Brian played in a very weak team were every time he walked out he was trying to atleast set west indies up for a fight and i saw so many many matches were they collapsed , amazing Jarrod didn't ask him about the 277, the 418 chase, the 28 runs of an over, last 2nd fastest ODI hundred at the time, laras 116 or 111 that blew away the south Africians or the 156 he amde at Adelade were he scored his final 100 runs of 54 balls and the last 50 of just 18 balls, then the 689 runs in sri Lanka or one of 4 batsmans to score half the runs of his entire team in a test match, he and Andy Flower did that. There are far more stats and innings i could mention but Lara was not someone who chased records. They were scores he made just to help the Windies survive defeat. I used to be a Stats guys but the older i got, Numbers tell one story, but hide a lot of valuable stuff. Freddie Flintoff, Chris Cairns, Carl hooper don't have the Numbers like Jack Kallis. Hersile gibbs was once the best batsman in ODI but his overall stats don't reflect that.
Those avs v Warne & Murali are god-level.
You should make your thumbnail better in terms of marketting. You can't tell it's a Brian Lara interview.
For example, make the title simple: "A Conversation With Brian Lara On Batting". That simple title would work a lot better than this. With the thumbnail instead of having a silhoutte of a batsman you can barely see who could be anybody, have a picture from the interview itself and add your picture too.
What more you need? He got Lara's pic and has ft:Lara
@@AMB5 his face live instead of an edited old picture is better plus jarrods face too
I agree,Jarrod is privileged enough to get interviews with these greats but not making most of it,look at grade cricketer,they put a photo of the person from the interview itself so people know it's a real new interview not an old one remodeled it should also be on his main channel,he's not getting views even with these greats so he should try it maybe next with whoever he gets on
@@Rambocris yes his current thumbnails make it feel like it's an edit with music on rather than an actual high quality interview which it is
jarrod, please listen to him.
That was a treat!
Why is this not on the main channel? I had to search for the video after seeing all the shorts.
Need to improve the thumbnail and pit it on main channel maate
can you make this with Klassen please
This desperately needs a good thumbnail.
its a shame, the interview was not the best. this is when i feel someone who heavily relies on stats and figures to justify a cricketers performance or how good he or she was really fails compared to the people who have played against or seen the cricketer. If you ask anyone who saw Sangakara or Kallis would know how good they are compared to lara, Sangakara was a great player so was Kallis but these guys didn't face the same attack or pressure that Brian Lara faced nor did they win test matches in the way Lara did. Kallis was lucky to be in a team with so many gifted players and all-rounds and Sangakara was like to play with Jayawardena, jayasuria, dilshan, tharanga, hasan tilikaratna.
But Brian played in a very weak team were every time he walked out he was trying to atleast set west indies up for a fight and i saw so many many matches were they collapsed , amazing Jarrod didn't ask him about the 277, the 418 chase, the 28 runs of an over, last 2nd fastest ODI hundred at the time, laras 116 or 111 that blew away the south Africians or the 156 he amde at Adelade were he scored his final 100 runs of 54 balls and the last 50 of just 18 balls, then the 689 runs in sri Lanka or one of 4 batsmans to score half the runs of his entire team in a test match, he and Andy Flower did that. There are far more stats and innings i could mention but Lara was not someone who chased records. They were scores he made just to help the Windies survive defeat.
I used to be a Stats guys but the older i got, Numbers tell one story, but hide a lot of valuable stuff. Freddie Flintoff, Chris Cairns, Carl hooper don't have the Numbers like Jack Kallis.
Hersile gibbs was once the best batsman in ODI but his overall stats don't reflect that.