Without exponentially increasing pressure, temperature, and mass. Society will not be able to achieve, and sustain the temperatures needed to engage the fusion strong force process. The technology needed to create an environment favorable to sustain nuclear fusion is more than 30-50 years away. It is pretty much impossible using today's materials, and technology. It just ain't going to happen anytime soon." To achieve the energy output of a star, a star you must become." (N.D Tyson)
Easy explanation for kids. Take two magnets with same pole next to each other. They repel. Push them together by force is what that machine does. They use big power magnets and force them together on same pole. They need a container locked to see what happens to the air and space between the 2 magnets as they get closer to each other. This is natural nature with correct tools.
National Ignition Facility, a lesson in how to spend $Billions over decades to create enough energy to boil a small pot of water, then tell the world of your success.
it is the only fusion experiment to have a net energy gain ever it was very successful and important for the growth of fusion technology in general. Even though the energy gain was small the impact was big
Small Modular Reactors are comming soon. They can go into the Grid closest to where power is needed. Can replace existing fossil fuel plants on the same site. We would have them already if not for the massive oil/gas lobby.
The choice to go for the difficult steady state operation process is typical for theoretic physicists ..... What we need are engineers who are more practical and undoubtedly will go for an intermittent process ... whereby the plasma burst directly induces an electromagnetic field to produced electricity.
I wonder if the high flux reactor I worked on Long Island. I’m retired and have been ignoring their requests to contact . Most interesting . There’s a lot of these labs that prove promising futures . I’ll see if anyone replies ..
For a number of years now, work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of a transmission that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grammeters. Such an instrument is the turbo encabulator. Now basically the only new principle involved is that instead of power being generated by the relative motion of conductors and fluxes, it is produced by the modial interaction of magneto-reluctance and capacitive diractance. The original machine had a base plate of pre-famulated amulite surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented. The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots of the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a non-reversible tremie pipe to the differential girdle spring on the “up” end of the grammeters. The turbo-encabulator has now reached a high level of development, and it’s being successfully used in the operation of novertrunnions. Moreover, whenever a forescent skor motion is required, it may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration.
Excellent summary, very informative. Reminds me of my science report on the Tokamak back in '93. Can't believe it's been 3 decades they've been working on it. Hope it works out. Maybe this time around, as when fission reactors came online and touted "energy too cheap to meter" that will actually be true rather than making energy even more expensive 😏
Great Video ! What reports do you have on the He3-D and/or He3-He3 Fusion Fuel Cycles ? Prof. Gerald L. Kulcinski of UW-Madison had a very small demo He3 reactor about the size of an eighteen inch (18") basketball ! Another Prof. a Geologist in the same department wrote a paper for the PM October 2004 issue on :He3 Fusion and the mining He3 from the Lunar Regolith ! tjl
Well why don't the Americans have a fusion reactor. The Germans have one the Chinese have one the Japanese have one. Why doesn't the United States have one
A very informative look into the 'Fusion' space over the past decades and up to now. I /we have so much to learn before we finally produce more than we use.
Have you seen what's happened in London, home now cost millions if not near ridiculous amounts, most can't afford the costs of living in London...people are being pushed out of London or into ghettos. More and more, your either rich or poor; jobs don't pay, and neither does job seekers allowance, so many people are ending up homeless... And ultimately our leaders are to blame, because they keep choosing to ignore the masses, who did not ask for many aspects of society whilst seeking change... I also think the typical Harry Potter like culture doesn't exist anymore, people are rude or hostile too moreso than ever. I want to get into politics to change the focus of politics...because money isn't being spent in the right places, and rudiments of society need re-evaluating...
This would melt if you did have any actual Neutrons in the Fuel. The put a neutron in the fuel, one would need to know where to find the neutron. Potassium is the first Atom with a neutron in it. This is provable. The weight difference of how much it should weigh to how much it does weigh. Two whole atomic unites off, by the way and do see this. But now if one did have the neutron in the fuel. This is what makes the bomb euploid. The neutron is the part that makes the chain Rx. This all so then I contrive to make the sun type heat. NO WAY then to contain the heat. The heat would melt down a Reactor. The sun is through a vacuum. and we get a lot of heat form it. So this is a huge interest of mine. But still do not see any of the very expensive Rx's sustaining the heat. I do not really know, but to use a cold fusion in all ready built reactors. the fuel is needing some thought. Molybdenum is lest reactive. I not knowing but do think this is an avenue to explore. That for putting this up. I was told these type of Rxers are Plasma. This Plasma is either hot or cold too. Putting cold plasma, the atom torn apart. but cold. I imagine can be a start place. and produce even a Star. or just go on not listening any way. Thanks for reading.
The plasma has grades. From 6100"F to core at 27000000°F. FIELD intelligence is needed. Do not muff up the definition of high temperature. Plasma is made of quarks only. Matter is different. A quark is any 4D particle smaller than 10^-13m. We have a 10^-21 limit. I am way ahead of your business and I do not need money to produce. It is particle wave, not particle only. How short can they create cosmic ray wavelengths? I win!
Hold on there, professor. Plasma is made up of ionized particles. Not only quarks, but electrons as well. Plasma is also considered a 4th state of MATTER. Ionized particles behave as both a wave AND a particle, as any quantum mechanical textbook would tell you. But please show how to produce without money. I, as well as others, would be very interested in that.
These projects are designed to enrich the promoters and provide lifetime employment for scientists. They are a Blackhole for government and investor funding. And …. It’s only another 30 years away! Unlikely to ever come to fruition or recover costs. Let’s invest in increasing the efficiency of proven and working technologies.
I am not against Big Science, although spin-offs seem to be more practical than the main project. Maybe some of the tech will be useful elsewhere. Meanwhile our stable fusion reactor (the Sun) keeps on bathing us in energy constantly. Moreover the climate catastrophe won't wait for us to build this Rube-Goldberg mousetrap for centralized energy. Might I suggest decentralized, microgrid networks using existing carbon neutral sources?
and where do you put your nuclear rods when they've spent their time? You just leave your sitting there too😮. What do we need nuclear when everything's charged right in the air.
I hope it wont blow up ... there i said it 😢😮😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉cuz if it does ... chain reaction . Im no physysist . Im just a jalous boy . I whant free energy to 😮😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
i live in germany and didnt even know this thing exist 😮
Such mal nach "Wendelstein 7X". So heißt die Maschine. Steht in Rostock.
Without exponentially increasing pressure, temperature, and mass. Society will not be able to achieve, and sustain the temperatures needed to engage the fusion strong force process. The technology needed to create an environment favorable to sustain nuclear fusion is more than 30-50 years away. It is pretty much impossible using today's materials, and technology. It just ain't going to happen anytime soon." To achieve the energy output of a star, a star you must become." (N.D Tyson)
A good bit of competition never hurt anyone!
Engineering should be left to the Germans because they were born for it
I think that means it is better than any other.
The great German people.... always at mankinds vanguard.. 21 Gun salute from Mexico...
God bless Germany 🇩🇪
So long as Germany keeps it's nose out of the internal affairs of other Countries ~ ~ Such as mine ( Ireland )
Easy explanation for kids. Take two magnets with same pole next to each other. They repel. Push them together by force is what that machine does. They use big power magnets and force them together on same pole. They need a container locked to see what happens to the air and space between the 2 magnets as they get closer to each other. This is natural nature with correct tools.
Come to Somalia brother make us something like this we will make shur you become the precidant
@@somaliano99kingkonghimself75on my way
This takes humanity to the next level and some do not know what is meant by that
100-150 Adlige regieren Deutschland, der Rest sind leere Menschenmengen. Sie sind die Hirten, ihr seid die Schafe. Kommt, meckert wie die Lämmer.
Stellarator looks like a speaker coil.
This is such good news. It should be at the top of the SDG7 list of priorities.
National Ignition Facility, a lesson in how to spend $Billions over decades to create enough energy to boil a small pot of water, then tell the world of your success.
Fission research grants are a mega cash cow that turns physicists into bureaucrats.
it is the only fusion experiment to have a net energy gain ever it was very successful and important for the growth of fusion technology in general. Even though the energy gain was small the impact was big
Germany. It is Germany. Topnotch technology as always.
Where is the beef ? Why not just make great fission based units NOW. May not be enough cheap oil to finish the fusion dream. ❤❤
Steam heat , old boy
Small Modular Reactors are comming soon. They can go into the Grid closest to where power is needed. Can replace existing fossil fuel plants on the same site. We would have them already if not for the massive oil/gas lobby.
The cost of the fusion hardware will be very high, resulting in a high cost per kWh. Renewables will likely remain cheaper per kWh power generated.
The death star needs a GREAT DEAL OF POWER...
HMMM
The choice to go for the difficult steady state operation process is typical for theoretic physicists ..... What we need are engineers who are more practical and undoubtedly will go for an intermittent process ... whereby the plasma burst directly induces an electromagnetic field to produced electricity.
Steady state operation is the only option to eventually become energy positive.
I wonder if the high flux reactor I worked on Long Island.
I’m retired and have been ignoring their requests to contact . Most interesting . There’s a lot of these labs that prove promising futures . I’ll see if anyone replies ..
For a number of years now, work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of a transmission that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grammeters. Such an instrument is the turbo encabulator.
Now basically the only new principle involved is that instead of power being generated by the relative motion of conductors and fluxes, it is produced by the modial interaction of magneto-reluctance and capacitive diractance.
The original machine had a base plate of pre-famulated amulite surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented.
The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots of the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a non-reversible tremie pipe to the differential girdle spring on the “up” end of the grammeters.
The turbo-encabulator has now reached a high level of development, and it’s being successfully used in the operation of novertrunnions. Moreover, whenever a forescent skor motion is required, it may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration.
And that, is how you make a plumbus.
Такой агрегат придумали и сделали в первые в СССР в 1978 году.. точнее прказали англичанам работающую модель
Excellent summary, very informative. Reminds me of my science report on the Tokamak back in '93. Can't believe it's been 3 decades they've been working on it. Hope it works out. Maybe this time around, as when fission reactors came online and touted "energy too cheap to meter" that will actually be true rather than making energy even more expensive 😏
When are they going to miniaturise it so I can power my Tesla with a mr. Fusion, that runs for 30 years without refuelling?
Great Video ! What reports do you have on the He3-D and/or He3-He3 Fusion Fuel Cycles ? Prof. Gerald L. Kulcinski of UW-Madison had a very small demo He3 reactor about the size of an eighteen inch (18") basketball ! Another Prof. a Geologist in the same department wrote a paper for the PM October 2004 issue on :He3 Fusion and the mining He3 from the Lunar Regolith ! tjl
US perfects lithium vapor cave, breaks nuclear fusion reactor heat barrier
Fingers crossed for this Game-Changing Projects ❤
Well why don't the Americans have a fusion reactor. The Germans have one the Chinese have one the Japanese have one. Why doesn't the United States have one
got 2 hand it 2 germany thats where thebrains r
Some of it looks like what Bob Lazar was describing back in the day. Crazy.
Exactly my thought that’s 90% a type of ufo….
Except that used a rotating liquid metal
A very informative look into the 'Fusion' space over the past decades and up to now. I /we have so much to learn before we finally produce more than we use.
How do you get energy out?
The nerd in me watched this all the way through. Lol
Have you seen what's happened in London, home now cost millions if not near ridiculous amounts, most can't afford the costs of living in London...people are being pushed out of London or into ghettos.
More and more, your either rich or poor; jobs don't pay, and neither does job seekers allowance, so many people are ending up homeless...
And ultimately our leaders are to blame, because they keep choosing to ignore the masses, who did not ask for many aspects of society whilst seeking change...
I also think the typical Harry Potter like culture doesn't exist anymore, people are rude or hostile too moreso than ever.
I want to get into politics to change the focus of politics...because money isn't being spent in the right places, and rudiments of society need re-evaluating...
All this is primitive compared to the galaxy in a box. It uses a hole to make a sound to do the work... and how about a terrawatt....
thank you
Plasma rhetoric and plasma blather are HERE ALREADY..
I CAN ONLY HOPE THE CONSORTIUM OF VERY RICH WILL CONSIDER TOILET PAPER A GOOD THING..
OH MY
Great information on the 'torus'.
This would melt if you did have any actual Neutrons in the Fuel. The put a neutron in the fuel, one would need to know where to find the neutron. Potassium is the first Atom with a neutron in it. This is provable. The weight difference of how much it should weigh to how much it does weigh. Two whole atomic unites off, by the way and do see this. But now if one did have the neutron in the fuel. This is what makes the bomb euploid. The neutron is the part that makes the chain Rx. This all so then I contrive to make the sun type heat. NO WAY then to contain the heat. The heat would melt down a Reactor. The sun is through a vacuum. and we get a lot of heat form it. So this is a huge interest of mine. But still do not see any of the very expensive Rx's sustaining the heat. I do not really know, but to use a cold fusion in all ready built reactors. the fuel is needing some thought. Molybdenum is lest reactive. I not knowing but do think this is an avenue to explore. That for putting this up. I was told these type of Rxers are Plasma. This Plasma is either hot or cold too. Putting cold plasma, the atom torn apart. but cold. I imagine can be a start place. and produce even a Star. or just go on not listening any way. Thanks for reading.
We are the best!
I heard a israel already has one of these being tested? And the UK have a better program for this ?
Die besten Dinge im Leben sind nicht Dinge, sondern die Menschen, die wir wertschätzen. Respekt
This Stella rater gives her a 10 !
Excellent 👍
The plasma has grades. From 6100"F to core at 27000000°F. FIELD intelligence is needed. Do not muff up the definition of high temperature. Plasma is made of quarks only. Matter is different. A quark is any 4D particle smaller than 10^-13m. We have a 10^-21 limit. I am way ahead of your business and I do not need money to produce. It is particle wave, not particle only. How short can they create cosmic ray wavelengths? I win!
Hold on there, professor. Plasma is made up of ionized particles. Not only quarks, but electrons as well. Plasma is also considered a 4th state of MATTER. Ionized particles behave as both a wave AND a particle, as any quantum mechanical textbook would tell you. But please show how to produce without money. I, as well as others, would be very interested in that.
These projects are designed to enrich the promoters and provide lifetime employment for scientists. They are a Blackhole for government and investor funding. And …. It’s only another 30 years away! Unlikely to ever come to fruition or recover costs. Let’s invest in increasing the efficiency of proven and working technologies.
Fantasy
Fuck yeah!
Good.
I am not against Big Science, although spin-offs seem to be more practical than the main project. Maybe some of the tech will be useful elsewhere. Meanwhile our stable fusion reactor (the Sun) keeps on bathing us in energy constantly. Moreover the climate catastrophe won't wait for us to build this Rube-Goldberg mousetrap for centralized energy. Might I suggest decentralized, microgrid networks using existing carbon neutral sources?
Let's go!😂
it's all around us in the air it's already been found without nuclear
IT DOESNT WORK
and where do you put your nuclear rods when they've spent their time? You just leave your sitting there too😮. What do we need nuclear when everything's charged right in the air.
Fusion reactors don't use nuclear fuel.
I hope it wont blow up ... there i said it 😢😮😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉cuz if it does ... chain reaction . Im no physysist . Im just a jalous boy . I whant free energy to 😮😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I wonder if this is an easier route than Nicola Teslas tehnology for free unlimited energy!?