Silent War 2.0 w/IJN 2.0 Short Campaign 1, Desperate Pearl part 4

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024
  • This is a continuation of my playthrough of Silent War 2.0 using the expansion IJN 2.0 from Compass Games.

ความคิดเห็น • 11

  • @eugeniomariopazielli8478
    @eugeniomariopazielli8478 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good luck Dave, we are all learning.

  • @Rodinov_Claw
    @Rodinov_Claw ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One quality of life that you can do in this game is to place counters or plastic cubes or tokens in Zones that are not in play to quickly filter out what you need to look for. It helped me plenty, so that I don't have to keep hunting the names every single turn.

  • @asyncritus
    @asyncritus ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You forgot to send your subs out that were ready for sea at Pearl Harbor.

  • @asyncritus
    @asyncritus ปีที่แล้ว +2

    56:20 - Dutch Harbor is not operational until War Event 6 occurs. See [21.0].

  • @asyncritus
    @asyncritus ปีที่แล้ว +2

    54:50 - In the re-attack round, even if you are unable to make a shot there is still a counterattack. See [14.17] B.

  • @asyncritus
    @asyncritus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    25:05 - For Combat Event 8 - Counterattack, you have to skip your sub's attack sequence for that round even if you end up with no revealed ASW. You should have proceeded directly to the reattack round, revealing additional ships.

  • @asyncritus
    @asyncritus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    27:52 - You did have place the fourth TDC marker, but you don't reveal the ship unless you decide to attack it.

  • @asyncritus
    @asyncritus ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You're getting closer on the 1/2 ASW rounding. The difference is that in the case of attacking, you round down AFTER the subtraction - but for the counterattack, you round the ASW value is up BEFORE the subtraction. But in the case of the attack, rounding down the result after doing the subtraction is the same as rounding the subtrahend (i.e. the ASW value) up before doing the subtraction. So it would have been much less confusing for them to say always round the total ASW value up before subtracting. I hope this makes sense.

    • @davesgamingcave7862
      @davesgamingcave7862  ปีที่แล้ว

      It does, but it seems pretty confusing for something that could've been designed a little easier.

    • @eugeniomariopazielli8478
      @eugeniomariopazielli8478 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davesgamingcave7862 It must also be said that it never goes below 0.50 (i.e. 1/2). When has there ever been a result of 0.49???

    • @asyncritus
      @asyncritus ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah I don't understand why that is mentioned. The only factions involved are always 0.5.