Theres a book called "murdered by isaac newton" which is an eye-opening look at how newton treated his fellow scientists. Newtons ego was larger than his sizable intellect.
Newton's discovery that gravity was universal and it was the same gravity that causes the planets to move in ellipses in the sky, causes things to fall down on earth, and that it was a kind of mysterious action at a distance, had its parallel in hermeticism which was directly linked to alchemy and astrology. The Emerald tablet states"That which is below is like that which is above and that which is above is like that which is below to do the miracle of one only thing." (translation by Isaac Newton.) My personal opinion is that Newton believed he had disproved astrology by identifying its astral influence on earth as the rather mundane gravity. I think it's hard to explain why a hermeticist would almost completely ignore astrology while spending so much time on alchemy, kabbalah/bible studies and hermetic philosophy otherwise.
Very nice lecture Dr Kendall. I enjoyed every bit of it, took notes like at the classroom. I find however that your last statement about Einstein providing an 'explanation' of gravity, unlike Newtonian gravity (NG), looks a little optimistic. GR is a necessary improvement and correction to NG, and a big step forward toward an eventual complete explanation. But does not yet provide the full picture. When Nobel laureate David Gross was asked by Richard Panek 'What is gravity?', his answer was blunt and clear: 'I wish we knew' (See 2017 YT vid "Coming to grips with gravity" (2:40) ). The rationale for the connection of mass to SPCT curvature is not provided by GR. Why does SPCT curve by the exact amount at every point, depending on the amount of mass, we still ignore. The point is subtle, but significant.
He was Isaac Newton. He'd probably only need to know that the speed on light is a finite universal constant and learn how fields resolve the problem of action at a distance.
@@JesseWRIGHT-th8mw Fields don't resolve the problem of action at a distance at all, fields are just a convenient way to model action at a distance. In fact Newtonian gravity is usually taught as a field model (instead of the point attraction that Newton used).
Probably a few minutes, and then he'd spend the weekend developing a "grand unified theory". Remember that this is the guy who, when encountering a problem he couldn't solve, would just invent a new type of mathematics to solve it. He makes Einstein look like Bill Nye the Science Guy.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 85 | คู่เอก "ยอดเหล็กเพชร vs ผึ้งหลวง"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qq_19bnnxEo/mqdefault.jpg)
Glad to see you back, Mr. Kendall. Hope all is well.
Theres a book called "murdered by isaac newton" which is an eye-opening look at how newton treated his fellow scientists. Newtons ego was larger than his sizable intellect.
No need to coddle lessers
As a guy who struggles to understand the concepts Newton discovered centuries ago, I feel calling his intellect ‘sizable’ is very offensive lol.
He would probably think that he was a blasphemous heathen who was shockingly lax in his alchemy and bible studies.
Newton's discovery that gravity was universal and it was the same gravity that causes the planets to move in ellipses in the sky, causes things to fall down on earth, and that it was a kind of mysterious action at a distance, had its parallel in hermeticism which was directly linked to alchemy and astrology. The Emerald tablet states"That which is below is like that which is above and that which is above is like that which is below to do the miracle of one only thing." (translation by Isaac Newton.)
My personal opinion is that Newton believed he had disproved astrology by identifying its astral influence on earth as the rather mundane gravity. I think it's hard to explain why a hermeticist would almost completely ignore astrology while spending so much time on alchemy, kabbalah/bible studies and hermetic philosophy otherwise.
@@JerehmiaBoaz Keen insight. Why indeed did he hardly ever mention astrology? You may be onto something.
Thankyou..Mr kendall, I always enjoy your videos..
You are very welcome
I have a copy of Newton's _Opticks,_ with a foreword by Albert Einstein, in which he acknowledges his debt to Newton.
27:35 In other words, "Shut up and calculate. " 😂 🎉
People are still trying to figure it out
Very nice lecture Dr Kendall. I enjoyed every bit of it, took notes like at the classroom.
I find however that your last statement about Einstein providing an 'explanation' of gravity, unlike Newtonian gravity (NG), looks a little optimistic.
GR is a necessary improvement and correction to NG, and a big step forward toward an eventual complete explanation. But does not yet provide the full picture.
When Nobel laureate David Gross was asked by Richard Panek 'What is gravity?', his answer was blunt and clear: 'I wish we knew' (See 2017 YT vid "Coming to grips with gravity" (2:40) ).
The rationale for the connection of mass to SPCT curvature is not provided by GR. Why does SPCT curve by the exact amount at every point, depending on the amount of mass, we still ignore.
The point is subtle, but significant.
Thanks for the note. It’s an excellent comment.
How long would it take Newton to comprehend the mathematics underlying relativity? First Special, and then General?
@@rchas1023 not too long ago- the physics are deeper than the math . Would be amazing to introduce them!!
He was Isaac Newton. He'd probably only need to know that the speed on light is a finite universal constant and learn how fields resolve the problem of action at a distance.
@@JesseWRIGHT-th8mw Fields don't resolve the problem of action at a distance at all, fields are just a convenient way to model action at a distance. In fact Newtonian gravity is usually taught as a field model (instead of the point attraction that Newton used).
Probably a few minutes, and then he'd spend the weekend developing a "grand unified theory". Remember that this is the guy who, when encountering a problem he couldn't solve, would just invent a new type of mathematics to solve it. He makes Einstein look like Bill Nye the Science Guy.
@@JesseWRIGHT-th8mw The speed of light was known quite accurately while he was alive
I think he might say ‘hey Albie - gravity’s an effect - not a thing…’
It's pronounced "prinnkippeeah. "C," in the middle of a Latin word, is pronounced as a K.
@@peterwexler5737 as in Julius Kaiser
We don’t pronounce it that way these days
@@whlewis9164 Eee-oolius
@@NicholsonNeisler-fz3gilol yes we do
Newton was no dummy. I think he would understand relativity if it had been explained to him.
Agree!