I really like how you explain phenomenology from the point of view of its inception from the naive attitude to the reflective attitude and so on. It shows the way the psyche, self, ego, etc., works, or the possibilities of how it can work. It reminds me of classical or medieval accounts of the inception of intellection and the types or species of intellection. All of this gives a practical insight into the structure of consciousness and the world, of course as they are connected and in many ways seemingly inseparable. The self can be naively glued to its easy grantedness of how things are, or it can begin to expand to a more open horizon of possible understandings. It changes everything we supposedly knew once we discover this.
@@NoeticEidetics thank you! Your observation about the types of intellect is on points. In Ideas Husserl talks on the modalities of reason and as far as I know there have been studies that compare his work to Thomism for example. Thanks for the feedback!
I really like how you explain phenomenology from the point of view of its inception from the naive attitude to the reflective attitude and so on. It shows the way the psyche, self, ego, etc., works, or the possibilities of how it can work. It reminds me of classical or medieval accounts of the inception of intellection and the types or species of intellection. All of this gives a practical insight into the structure of consciousness and the world, of course as they are connected and in many ways seemingly inseparable. The self can be naively glued to its easy grantedness of how things are, or it can begin to expand to a more open horizon of possible understandings. It changes everything we supposedly knew once we discover this.
@@NoeticEidetics thank you! Your observation about the types of intellect is on points. In Ideas Husserl talks on the modalities of reason and as far as I know there have been studies that compare his work to Thomism for example. Thanks for the feedback!