I am a bird photographer. The two most important features are one, auto focus and two, frame rate. The OM1 is very good in the first, and outstanding in the second. The usable frame rate at 50 frames per second allows me to see things that I would otherwise miss.
What is the most important thing I look for in a camera (from your question at 6:00): contrast AF that works well in video without a face to track, lower / natural indoor light performance. Ergonomics cease to matter if the camera's electronics struggle to get the video and shots I'm after (struggling with focus, and noisy capture), even if the camera is comfortable to hold, and it is easy to adjust its settings. Although your point is well taken (about comfort and intuitive controls and menus), I'm willing to endure a bit of struggle if it means I end up with electronics that I can depend on to capture the shot I took at exactly the right moment, and at precisely the correct angle or panning movement. If it's noisy or out of focus, the fact it was comfortable to hold isn't worth anything. Edit: The focus drift at 11:57 (your face is goes out of focus, and stays out of focus) is something I can't tolerate, and that's a perfect example of a hard fail for a camera for my use-case. By 12:18, the trees in the background are in perfect focus, but your face is not. Which camera was this shot with BTW? Sorry if I missed it and you mentioned that already.
Most important camera attributes for me. First, is definitely how it interfaces with me. If the camera works like an extension of my hand and eye, then I will pick it up regularly, and enjoy the experience. Frankly, this is the main reason why I am so loyal to the Olympus/OMDS brand. Their cameras just seem to work naturally, and easily for me. Their light weight, ergonomic design, and intelligent interface layout don't get in the way of my usage; Second, is reliability. Actually, this is probably tied for first. It is absolutely essential that my gear work reliably every time. This is another reason why I am so loyal to Olympus. Their cameras have been consistently solid in that regard; Third, is lens selection and image quality. Honestly, these kind of go hand in hand. You can't get good images without good glass. That said, with good glass, pretty much any camera by any manufacturer can produce excellent images. The differences between brands and models when fitted with a good lens is pretty negligible in real world situations, which is why this is only number three on my list. That said, Olympus offers an excellent range of superb optics which makes their system even more compelling, especially when you compare the prices of good quality "full frame" lenses. They are so pricey as to almost rule themselves out of the contest in some cases. Well, that's about it for me.
WOW! Peter! I finally have someone who explains why having 2 identical cameras is important. I have the EM1X and had the EM1 Mkii, so I purchased another EM1X so I could have identical cameras, and have the same setups and have no brain power working to think about the settings, and especially the buttons. I also like two cams because I go into nasty dirty dusty environments and have two lenses already mounted and no worries about changing lenses. I also setup one camera, then save the settings and write to the second camera. I also put a small yellow sticky inside the rear LCD to tell me what each C setting is, very helpful. And then the cameras are named X1, and X2, same with the SD cards in camera. That helps when downloading the photographs. I keep separate Lightroom catalogs for each X. I rekon that is my short primer for 2 identical cams:) Cheers!
Yeah, using two bodies of the EM-1ii in wildlife photography changed all for me. However, with the new OM-1, I have just ordered the 150-400/4.5 Pro instead of a second OM-1 body. I'll keep one of my EM-1ii as a second body
@@joerghummerjohann4854 that won’t last long. I have the the OM-1 and 150-400mm Pro and when you use subject detect with all AF points - and you see how fast the camera aquires the subject (way faster than even my R3 or my friends A1) - your EM1 Mkii will collect dust.
I had purchased the Em1 Mk iii a while ago and found it fitted perfectly with what I like to shoot, when the OM-1 was announced I decided to put a deposit down ready for their arrival on the scene. It was fantastic to use, better grip, better battery life, bird detect, beautifully made etc, but three weeks ago it started playing up, wouldn't start, when did the autofocus was intermittent then the lcd screen started to play eg only showing vertical close spaced lines, ti is in the hands of Olympus Technicians here in New Zealand, at the moment I am very disappointed with the short amount of time I have been able to use it before breaking down ! I don't no as yet whether I will keep it, time will tell !
Usability and how it feels in my hand. EVF that works with my eyeglasses. Solid feel. A pleasing shutter sound. Responsive when turning on or waking up from sleep. Quick and reliable AF. Image quality is not an issue…it’s been good enough for all cameras for many years.
20Mp prints about 17” wide which is the width of my Epson printer. With the lens quality an upsized 24” x 20” looks perfect. I picked up my Nikon D850 with G2 Tamron 24-70 f2.8 last night after a few days with the OM. My god it is huge. I’ll be finishing my career with Olympus
I agree - ergonomics and usability are the most important aspects of a camera to me - given that the image quality is also okay. Bigger sensors and more pixels are always better, but not always necessary. A bigger sensor captures more light, and if you have more pixels you can crop more and there are more details in the image. Noise is not worse with more pixels, as many think, because the file doesn't need to be enlarged as much as a file with less pixels. MfT is good enough for nearly everything, but I give it up in favour of a Nikon Z full frame system which produces cleaner files and gives me a wider latitude in post processing.
It's only a few years ago when we though a 5 or 8 megapixel image was a huge deal. Most photojournalists made the leap to digital when 1mpg images became possible around the late '90s. Local community colleges stopped teaching film photography when 12mpg was pretty much the standard (although that seems to be making a bit of a comeback; Not unlike vinyl recordings). There have been so many print comparisons in onlne forums and, invariably, even the experts usually can't tell the difference without intense pixel-peeping. 20mpg is plenty unless your printing billboards and it's kind of a sweet spot. Every camera out there today is capable of doing some pretty amazing stuff in the right hands and, for me, the deal breaker is, simply, how does the camera feel in MY hands? This is why I've stuck with Olympus since i jumped to digital from film almost 20 years ago and this is why I'm adding the OM-1to my collection now.
Thank you for sharing your experiences and impressions Peter. In regard to image quality at high ISO's, there is a definite and obvious improvement in my opinion. I recently compared the studio scene sample images from the OM-1 and the new Canon R7 over on the Imaging Resource site. At every ISO up to and including ISO 25600, the OM-1 shows clearly better results in both noise handling and image detail. The R7 is a less expensive camera, but it is also an APS-C sensor and one of Canon's latest cameras. Also, thanks for explaining why you 'need' two OM-1's. Many people don't understand the importance of having two cameras with the same settings, controls, ergonomics, and menu system when you are shooting professionally. I shot weddings and corporate events professionally up until 2020, and always had two of the same camera bodies. As hectic and fast paced as events can be, the last thing a professional needs is to grab a second body and have to remember where controls are, or how to change an important setting.
Very interesting point about the R7 comparison, Greg. I guess this bodes well for the upcoming E-M5 camera that's supposed to be released this month! It has the same sensor at the OM-1, so you will have APSC quality images at a consumer friendly price point.
Great interesting video. I’m still waiting on my OM-1. I like a camera that is easy to operate out of the box, then I will start using the extra features.
On handling and usability: When I purchased my first Olympus camera I chose the E-M10 MKII over the E-M10 MKIII because it felt better in my hand and some of the feautures of the MKII were removed from the MKIII.
This camera will put OM back up with the leaders as far as video specs and sensor specs. Not that there was much wrong with its predecessor. The video specs in particular are useful for professional videographers. As far as sensor size goes, 20 megapixels surpasses 35mm film resolution and is more than enough to fit on a 65inch UHD screen. The data and processing requirements for this size image are also manageable for my current home setup as an amateur photographer. So in that respect I do not want or require larger images. I will probably start saving up to get an OM1.
Thanks Peter. Regarding the most important features, I’d add affordability to the list. As a bird photographer, my OM1 gives so much more for my money than alternative formats.
I think it’s around the same price that I payed for my E-M1 mark II, when bought new. If you to take in to account inflation. This new camera is actually cheaper than the mark II.
Thank you for making this! I've gotten to finally play with the OM-1! I love a lot about it including the handling! The biggest thing for me that I was worried about was if they strayed too far from the E-m1 and I'm just glad they didn't. I do find that it's is actually a bit bigger if you're holding it for hours. I find that the slightly bigger grip adds just a slight amount more stress on my fingers. Not much but it's definitely there. I also find that I don't like the recessed dials. The slight slant and exterior dials on the E-M1.2/3 body is definitely easier for me to handle. However, this is most likely because I have used the E-M1.2 since 2016-17. Performance wise, I do find it much much faster than the E-M1.2. I'm able to get through my jobs faster! Live Comp is something I use weekly and the OM-1 processes it SO QUICKLY! I also find that the faster processing of the HHHR makes it better with flashes as well, the sync speed is faster with High Res mode now I no longer have to carry an extra light to compensate when using High Res mode for product shots.
Thanls a lot, dear Peter! I'm very happy obout my OM-1, I still have to study some details, but the upgrade from EM1ii was a quantum step forward for me, espacially for bird photography. And the handling is better, too
The ‘quantum step forward’ is full-frame. Four times more total light, two stops less noise. Better tonal transitions. Also resolutions up to 60MP. Just saying.
@@dafyddmills6659 I disagree on that. I know the pros and cons of the different formats and I shot FF during the film days. Photography of wildlife, especially of birds in flight with the new light gear of MFT is just another type of photography, how you - as a photographer - can react quickly to the situations in nature, which is only possible with light weight gear. In addition to excellent tech such as OM-1 combined with the 150-400/4.5 Pro. See e.g. Mike Lanes competition of the OM-1 with Sony Alpha A1. for bird photography. A honest trial. Finally , Mike have chosen the OM-1. He just liked to shoot with it more and with more pleasure (besides of all the tech comparisons he made; for him both systems are in the same "league") This might not be the case for all photographers. Everybody should choose by his/hers own preferences and type of projects. But finally: OMDS made a fantastic job to stay in this business and not behind.
Good video quality and good sound... straight out of camera or did you color grade? What mic setup did you use? Also, not a lot of movement or difficult situations , but AF seemed spot on....
Thanks. There is slight color grading. It was shot using H.265. It is better than H.264. The sound was recorded using Ride Wireless Go. It was also slightly tweaked. Yes the AF and face Priority works well.
Focus is my number one priority. Nothing else matters if you can’t nail the focus. I have the EM1.2, which I really like, and I shot with the EMX. The focus system for action simply does not compare with any of the recent Canon, Nikon or Sony cameras I have owned. I find it hard to judge reviewer opinions on AF, as they rarely compare to the best, like my Sony A1. This feature always seems to get over hyped on Olympus cameras. Maybe the OM1 has closed the gap. I’m interested to hear from someone that also shoots with an R5, A1 or Z9. I’m not expecting parity, given the cost difference. What I love about the Olympus cameras is the weight with lenses and the superb ergonomics for focus stacking. Cheers.
Agree this on EM1.2. Always felt AF is randomly there when shooting fast mountainbiking in woods. No nailing and very often busted hi ISO for ETTR. Imo this AF&hiISO together is very limiting in action shooting when in the woods or dim light. So even if there is nailed shot there is hiISO to deal with. I know you can buy a one more software for noise but it is NOT my way what comes algorithms on picture and my photography. Also like ergonomics and I think it is more needed for BIF with tele.
I am actually glad that OM System stayed at 20 MP with this camera's sensor. The plain physics of digital photography dictate that as long as you are incorporating a Bayer array, increasing the pixel/area ratio also increases the low-light color noise, all other things remaining constant. That has always been my biggest challenge with m4/3 (and 4/3) photography, especially when shooting at night. Almost all of the prints that I sell are 16x20 and even with significant cropping, 20 MP has produced perfectly crisp images. Perhaps if I was going as large as 24x30 prints, those 20 MP images might become an issue, but even then the resolution of a print that large would still be far more detailed than what I ever produced back when I was printing from 35mm film.
The sensor probably is the Sony IMX 472. Sony says it’s a Quad Bayer sensor.Dpreview says it’s not. If you you use terminology like some phone companies do, you could say it’s a 80 Mpixel sensor!😃
What do I want in the first firmware update? Fix the AF tracking , make me a happy Chappie. BTW Peter, I have shot over 12000 bird images with the 100-400 in the last 2 months. Ihave found that I get the best results by having a base ISO set at ISO 1000, most images shot at 400mm so f6.3 or f7.1-8 and appropriate SS.When I get it right in low light the results are impressive,not quite as good as my friend and his 150-400mm,now there is a sharp lens.Cheers for now and thanks for your views.
Good to get your thoughts on this excellent looking camera Peter. It looks a good option for wildlife photographers for sure escpecially given the range of lenses available.
20mp is perfect, I prefer to have less pixels and better iso performance. Usability and versatility are my main camera choice features and Olympus cameras have check them both for quite a while now. Regarding to sensor resolution, nowadays the quality of image editing software is so good that you can boost the size of a 20mp image to very large formats for fine art prints. I'm geting an OM1 next year.
Hello Peter. I worked 45 years as a professional Photographer with two systems. First 25 years Nikon. In the late nineties I had to switch to Canon because They came with digital cameras. Nikon also tried but they lost it with bad camera's and bad quality. I worked about 15 years with EOS 1D(16 MP) and Canon EOS ds(mark11 and 111) (20 mp 7900 euro. a lot of money). Now I see the discussions about sensors, dynamic range and so on. I never had clients who asked me that. . They only looked to the quality of the pictures, Since 3 month I make pictures with a DJI Mini 3 drone. The quality of such a little camera with such a little sensor is amazing. Now I am investing in a Micro Four Third system. OM-systems seems my favorite. Why, because the quality of the body and pictures, the compact lenses, the autofocus system etc. The technical revolution of electronic camera's is so fast that investing in a very expensive system(Canon, Nikon and Sony high end) is not responsible. The OM1-system is the only high end professional system on the market for a responsible price. I would like that the OM DE M1X in 2023 can get the specifications of the OM 1 because the body and weight fits more for my professional use. Nobody can give me an answer what OM-stems is going to do with that body. When not, I am going for the OM 1 with battery holder 24-40 2.8 pro for daily work , 50-150 2.8 pro for sports etc). VIVA OM Systems
I agree that handling and ergonomics in general are two of the most important things in a camera body for me. While I trust the Olympus ergonomics, for my first mirrorless Olympus I chose the OM-D E-M1X strictly because I knew the ergonomics would work for me. Prior to that I only used an E420 which handled like a charm for me. I know for a fact that handling is so important to me because I mostly shoot Nikon and my Olympus gear is mostly used as a means to break the routine and get a different inspiration; however, I have an exceptionally well specced body (Z7II) but the handling just doesn't work for me for some reason so the body is collecting dust. People seem to be big on AF and AF tracking these days which is something I don't even think about when I purchase a camera, and in terms of image quality, I still like the results I get from the E420 and I'm much more happy to carry it around and shoot with it all day rather than shooting with the much more advanced Z7II just for the sake of ergonomics! So, I guess we are very much alike in this respect.
Interesting experiences. Some comments/questions... 1. I've had the reported problems with eye/face detection, too. 2. In addition, I also had problems with the EM-1.iii in that eye/face detection "detected" faces where there were none, e.g., based on some pattern in trees. 3. My temporary solution to #2 has been to set up the AE-ON button to *not* use eye/face detection, while the shutter release button uses eye/face detection. This way, I can focus without eye/face detection when the algorithm gets into trouble. 4. Your comment kind of "ruins" my solution... if I need to set up the entire sensor as focus area in order to get eye/face detection to work, I guess the same focus area is used with AE-ON... The same problem would be there if I program another button to toggle eye/face detection, because one would also need to change the focus area (+ change to C-AF?) 5. If my understanding is correct, the best choice would probably be to use one of the Custom modes (e.g., C1) for eye detection?? 6. Also, I don't quite understand why eye/face detection is not categorized as one of the Subject Detection modes. That way, we could toggle Subject Detection by a programmed button, and use hold+rotate the back wheel to choose which mode to use. I don't know if I have properly understood this, though, but am curious about your thoughts.
Good points. I have set up C2 to use face/eye priority. C1 is for everyday photography and face/eye priority is off. I think the eye and face priority is not in Subject recognition because face and Eye priority has been in Olympus cameras for years.
@@ForsgardPeter I think you are right wrt. why eye priority has not been grouped with Subject recognition. Still, I think that *logically*, it belongs with Subject recognition -- and that would also make the OM-1 simpler to set up. On the other hand -- perhaps it is simpler to move the new menu system to older cameras if they keep eye priority as a separate choice.
I'm using my OM-1 also for a bit more than 2 months, super happy with it. The only thing that I noticed, is that the AI Face Detection has some troubles with toddler faces. When a toddler for example stands in front of me and an adult faaaar in the background... the AI takes the adult into focus who stands meters behind the child. You can correct it quickly by moving the camera a bit. But happens rarely, very rarely. But my R6 had also in the beginning troubles with the AI Face Detection. Nothing that can't be fixed with the Firmware in the future. Greetings from Espoo.
@@matthiasbruns8570 Hmmm... I wrote an answer but it didn't appear. Or was it direct to you? Whatever will write it again. The face detection works fine, it happens only sometimes that the AI has some troubles. But this was with my Canon R and R6 exactly the same. But after two updates of the firmware it was better/gone. I do only children's photography with the OM-1, and I'm more than happy with it. I never had a camera with perfect firmware from the beginning. Normally all "problems" are gone with one or two updates - as mentioned the Canon R and R6 were also sometimes clumsy with the detection with the first firmware.
Hi Peter, thankyou for another great video, I am in the process of selling my extensive range of Canon cameras and high end lenses to make this exciting transition to 4/3rds photography, and have really enjoyed the many informative, and honest videos you have released supporting this system and I'm convinced this new release from OM Systems will be my preferred new pathway. I am mostly a landscape and nightscape photographer, so would really value your opinion on lens for milkyway and aurora photography.
OM SYSTEM does not have fast super wide lens. The 8mm f1.8 Fish-eye is one option, but fish-eye is not for everyone. I know I should not sat this, but Laowa 10mm f2 is a great lens. It is MF. That is most likely not that big deal in astrophotography.
Nice video. The optional battery grip is quite pricey. At least they finally added the joystick for selecting the focus point. Being a hobby and retired, can't justify the costs.
Totally agree that usability is what I look for first and foremost. Can't expect much change in IQ @ 20Mpix, or even 24Mpix that would make a practical difference, so I'm happy that OMDS stucked to 20Mpix, which is more that what 99% of people's true need. What I'd like to see is a video focussed on S-AF performance, which is reported to be below expectations.
The AF settings have to be set a bit differently than before. I have not had any issues other than the ones I was talking about in the video. That was the AF area and C-AF.
5/16/22 Has the new OM-System camera added built-in GPS recording, I have this built into my older Sony Bridge camera and find it very accurate at recording the location I took the photo from. Taking several hundred photos when I am out and about makes it easy for me not to have to worry later on about my memory of the photos that were taken from, plus it provides me with the details if I am off the beaten path to go back with no issues. Having to use blue-tooth to a cell phone is unnecessary steps that were solved years back that should be part of the OS built into the camera since the newer camera has longer battery life. So Peter what are your views on this issue?
OM-1 does not have built-in GPS. You can track the locations with your mobile phone and then transfer the data into your images. There are some good things about this method, but also not so good. The only Olympus camera that has built-in GPS is E-M1X and then TG-series cameras have it too.OM-1 is built for outdoor and wildlife photographers so I would not mind if the GPS was built-in. Not sure why it has been left out. Maybe it is the size?
You talked about ‘when using ND filter….’ Ithought there is a possibility to activate a digital ND in this camera? I have a Panasonic G80, but use my Sony AIII for low light circumstances , concerts , events, with moving objects . Wonder if the OM1 would as usabal for low light instead as the Sony ff is ?
If you do a lot of low light photography of course bigger sensor gives advantages what it comes to IQ. On the other sometimes having a smaller system might have advantages. With the noise reduction software like DxO Pure RAW2 or Topaz DeNoise AI can help a lot.
I have normal size hands and I love this camera! I'm not a proffessional photographer but I have used more advanced cameras for about 10 years and I find all omd 1 cameras from omd 1 mark ll to this camera fun and easy to work with. I did not need the om-1, l just couldn't resist it and had the money to buy it and I love it. 😉
As a bird photographer for the last 10 years I never needed frame rate more than 10 frames per second. So the new 50 f/s in the OM-1 is not important for me. I don't care for the 60fr/s in 4K video as well. I thing 30f/s is enough. If I buy camera for video I would buy GH6. The AF is the only good reason to buy that camera. But Olympus firmware update adds bird detection AF to the flagship E-M1X which has a pretty decent autofocus already and a dual battery that works as one. 2500 shots without changing the battery plus the ability to use 2 fast UHS-II cards tipped the scales to cancel the order for OM-1 which I have been waiting for since March and I would wait at least until the end of June. And ordered E-M1X. I was lucky enough to buy it for only $ 1060 from Ebay on 9000 shots alone. Separately, this deal saved me $ 1,100 not to buy the $2200 OM-1. Tomorrow I will have the opportunity to test it and I hope will work well with the Olympus 300mm F4 + 1.4TC lens mainly for wildlife photography. I can also make a video here on TH-cam for comparison with my Canon 5DS and 400mm F4 DO IS II USM + 1.4 TC lens which is absolutely equal to the magnification of the M 4/3 configuration. If I have a decent result from the more compact M 4/3 configuration I can switch from Canon to it.
E-M1X is still quite capable for bird photography. It has some advantages over OM-1, like the two batteries you mentioned. By the way OM-1 has two UHS-II card slots too.
@@ForsgardPeter It's good to know. I just like the look and feel on the E-M1X. If I order battery grip for the OM-1 which is only an available backorder of course and that adds me another $ 350. Extra battery and we go to $ 2650 for the OM-1. Nearly $ 1,600 more than I currently have for the E-M1X. And by the way, today I tested it, the camera works amazingly for me. As the video by hand with amazing stabilization and for BF the AF works really well with the new bird detection mode. I know the OM-1 may be better in AF performance but the E-M1X is enough for my needs. Not to mention that after the sale of canon lenses and cameras I will get back another $ 6000- $ 7000 :). Good Luck!
fps is one of those things you don't think you need, until you try it, than it's hard to live w/o. If you shoot BIF, doubling your fps can net you many more keepers, and capture moments you didn't know you were missing.
Is it someway possibility to look lenses? and what third part lenses you can use (eg with adapter) and what limitations. Also it wuold be also intresting to know other four-thirds maker lens suitability lens selection, how they fit to new OM-1. Area is large, but at least you should have proper connections?
In theory yes, but in practise it would be hard to get hold of all the different lenses. The amount of lenses is so vast that it would be impossible. Practically all the native m4/3 lenses are compatible. There might be some restrictions with Lens IS with other brands. There is always the IBIS that can be used.
My big concern is usability when I take pictures for my radio club, and when doing photos with and for Sandra. If I am asked for a photo that needs changing camera settings - if that takes five minutes, it is a disaster. Same thing when I do stills of a harbor scene, and a ship starts moving. Has the ship gone by the time I have the correct settings on the OM-1? Last Sunday I got stills and video on the E-M10 IV, when the MARSDEN BAY started its departure. The video using both got me a compliment on FaceBook. My cameras have to fit in with my environment, the same as I have to.
I find that handling is unique to just about every camera Ihave used. I’ve adapted to all of them over the years, and the favorite is always the LAST one. ProCapture is a bit attraction for me, and IS is really important. Third for me is autofocus (I’m not getting any younger).
Two technical questions I've been wondering about: 1. If I set the OM-1 to store *only RAW* files to the SD cards, and I use a computational mode that produces JPG files -- what will happen? Will the camera still store the JPG files, or will the results get lost? 2. Can I assign buttons to different operations/choices in different custom modes? In other words, can I use the AEL button for one purpose in mode C1, and for another in mode C2? [Not sure that it is a good idea, though...]
I am not sure I agree on the AF face detect is as reliable as my old m1.2. I have tried having AF using the whole frame it helps a bit but make it totally unpredictable when no face is detected. I have two IM-1’s and the behave they both behave the same way. I have some travel coming up and I am concidering taking the m1.2 with me instead.
I have not even opened the shoulder strap package. There are two reasons I do not use them. First I mostly use wrist strap and the shoulder strap screams the brand. Not that I mind, but it shines and draws attention to the camera. That is something I do not want when going out and photograph.
Having owned a lumix G9 for close to a year and loving pretty much every about it EXCEPT for the crappy autofocus when trying to get BIF or military jets, I'm really interested in the OM-1. From the videos I've seen on TH-cam I think the autofocus of the OM-1 looks far superior to the G9. I think even with my Leica lenses, 100-400mm and 12-60mm it should be superior to the G9. My olympus 60mm macro would probably be a little nicer on the OM-1 as well. Very good video, thank you for such an in depth review.
I'm in the same boat. I am doing more wildlife and BIF and the G9 just doesn't cut it sometimes. Lots of shots slightly out of focus if it can grab focus at all. Birds are almost impossible. Between that and that computation photography features in the OM-1, it is a really compelling offer.
I commented on you first post about this camera with my own opinion that I thought it was too expensive. The Canon APC model released today is more like the price I think the OM1 should have been but obviously I am in the minority.
I know that 2000€ is a lot of money. On the other hand the value for money is very good. The features are top class. I watched a few videos about the new Canons. Interesting choice to use a APS-C size sensor. The R7 looked were competitive. Not sure if a FF lens is optimal on a APS-C sensor. I once had an APS-C canon, Canon 7D and used only FF lenses, but the sharpness was not very good. It was ok with EF-S lenses. Not sure if that is case today.
Great video Peter, but for some reason I did not see the links to videos that you mentioned during this one ? I have a special place in my heart for the Olympus!
Hi Peter, I am using the E-M1 Mk II and the E-M1x. I have big hands and kind of "wide" thumbs... I appreciate a generous space available to place my right hand thumb on the back of the camera. The Mk II is fine in this regard, but especially the E-M1x. I tried the Mk III in a local store but found that my thumb was also touching the joystick, which was not nice. As I do a lot of bird photography, often in cold weather, this issue becomes even more pressing. Is the OM-1possible to use conveniently using winter gloves. Is there enough space ?? What is your experience ?
I read in a review that the OM-1's viewfinder is worse for eyeglass wearers because of the higher magnification. The viewfinder of the E-M1lll is more comfortable and you can see the corners of the image better when shooting with glasses. Is that true?
I use the em10 mark ii as it is the smallest camers for travel but i still havent found a reason to upgrade to the 3 or 4. Some of the features of the mark 2 are still not present in the mark 4 such as the small af point. Id love to see pdaf in a mark 5 version, better IS, the small af point and a return to metal top and bottom plates.
I have both the Markll and MarklV. AF is massively better with the MarklV and it is much lighter. Nevertheless, I will sell it again and keep my Markll. I like the flat grip of the Markll, the more personalisable magnifier function (for old MF lenses), the small AF point and the ability to see the info data in the viewfinder outside the image field. Also, the dials on the MarklV feels cheaper. I still use an E-M5lll as my main camera, which is superior in all respects to my two E-M10s and the best camera i've ever had. But for some macros i like the tilting display of the E-M10 better.
Excellent reflections as usual. for me a camera must be ergonomic and have high operating speed. (I can't wait for electronics). Excellent choice not to increase the resolution. 20 megapixels is already enough for such a small sensor. In my opinion it was also fine with 16mp. i print 30x45cm with a 12mp fullframe. By now Today all the cameras have excellent photographic quality and even exaggerated bursts. (does a sports photographer really need more than ten fps)
@@ForsgardPeter I see you made 1h 4k 25 fps. Could you be so kind and try 2h cinema 4k 60 fps at 22 °c or higher. If this works i would probably sell my em1x or em1iii and go to om1. Thank you very much.
It's really funny that this digital camera has the same name as the OM-1 from 1971 - which is why I clicked on this video link 🤣🤣 But now that I watched the digital OM-1 video, it seems to be a great camera for the MFT crowd, much focused on action and speed. Still I would love if they do an upgrade to the digital PEN-F from 2016!
Regarding megapixels, I think it would be nice for composition since it makes cropping more merciful but isn't entirely necessary. My interest with the OM-1 is how the new stacked sensor will develop. Its appearance is essentially a herald for some really exciting developments to be done in the next couple of years. I for one would leap at the chance to get an improved Pen camera if they released one once the sensor matures a little. Would also like to see third-party lens makers like tamron take an interest in MFT a lil more so we could have some more budget options. OM glass is amazing but can be a little prohibitive in cost at the greater zoom ranges for hobbyists.
@@friatankar if you can do that that is great. However you have to admit that some of the longer reaching lenses for MFT are rather costly and not always reasonable for everyone to afford.
8MP was enough for me. But that doesn't mean I say no to 20. The lenses, camera, SD cards, current PCs seem to handle it w/o problems, so I don't see any downsides with it.
Another great video! Still hoping for a new OM5 with stacked sensor though :D As for 24 or 26 MP... I doubt most MFT lenses are really designed for this very dense amount of megapixels. For me it would not really worth the additional cost for lenses & camera. It sounds a lot but I usually don't see that much of a difference on other cameras. Of course the difference usually gets obvious around 30+ MP but I don't think that would be the right direction for MFT. As for H265... I've come to like this codec (so much more compact than prores and quite flexible). It's great that it's also included here, but it's definitely not the easiest format to edit even on a good PC (of course it also depends on the hardware setup)
Similar mindset like yours,… Man thats what i only wish for, if the GH6 managed to push 25.2 mp i don’t see why OM can’t?!… just imagine that camera phones with half inch sensors are pushing 48 mp, 64 mp and even 108 mp… i don’t see why MFT technology cant push at least minimum to 33 mp… it would be great for large printing… 🤷♂️
@@matttheking1655 the thing is, megapixel on smartphones is usually just cool numbers on paper, it's great for advertising. In reality a proper professional 20MP camera will likely outperform a 40MP smartphone in terms of detail and quality. And in some cases the high MP count on smartphone is very limiting in terms of camera settings (lower aperture values and stuff like that...) Besides, I have yet to see GH6 footage where the additional MP really made a significant difference. I think the potential downsides is not worth it at this point. At least not for me.
@@matttheking1655 The GH6 is marketed towards people wanting optimum video imaging. But, if you're shooting video with a 16:9 aspect ratio, you're losing 25% of the sensor area on a M4/3 camera, unless you are using an anamorphic lens. Those additional MPs are useful for recording widescreen images. The OM-1, while quite competent at shooting video, is first aimed at still photography, where there are certain advantages to lower pixel density.
I use aperture priority most of the time and "drive" the camera by changing aperture, ISO and exposure compensation. It's therefore essential for me that these three things are easy to do, which they are on my 3 Olympuses. Peter, do you use high resolution mode, which I think goes up to 80 pixels?
I know that a lot of people think this doesn't matter that much, and in many ways I agree but I would like to see a 43 megapixel om systems camera. I am very happy with my 20 megapixel E-M1 iii. If an OM-1X (E-M1X ii) came out with 40+ megapixel, I would be willing to spend $3000+ for it. That being said, I think this is where OM needs to go. If they want to become one of the most sought after nature wildlife cameras, they will do 3 things to compete with Sony/Canon/Nikon: 1) Keep the similar performance to OM-1 (maybe 24 frames per second would suffice), 2) bump the megapixels to compete with the R5, and 3) put a big emphasis on video features. Look, I am extremely happy with what I have, but I want my investment to keep winning financially, and imagine how many people would prefer the lightweight portability of micro 4/3, but the detail and flexibility of having larger files for cropping, and higher res video and/or more video fidelity: i think this is the winning formula for OM, and micro 4/3 as a whole
At the moment I think the 20Mpix + something is the maximum amount of pixels that m4/3 can handle with the existing technology. It is a good compromise. Of course,, if the demand is something more, they should consider adding more megapixels.
Hi Peter, do the right hand side dials become easier to spin over time? I just upgraded from a G85 and the new dials are a bit painful for my fingertips when I’m scrolling through the gallery. It takes a lot more force to spin the dial than my old camera. Thanks!
Hi Peter, I'm confused as on a few reviews (or comment sections), people are stating that noise levels look very similar to the E-M1 Mark III, then they add that noise is much more easily reduced in post - probably a different grain structure or pattern, I don't know, or perhaps the improved DR helps in having less noise in the shadow areas etc. Do you have any take on this? If confirmed, perhaps the noise performance at high iso has actually improved quite a lot (though not really a 2 stops improvement as claimed initially).
Peter, I basically agree with everything you said . I use the OM 1 now for approximately 40 days. I can easily compare the OM 1 to my E-M1 III which I still use when i am lazy to change lenses. The reason I bought the OM 1 are the numerous slight improvements ( new sensor, AF, noise etc. ), but most important to me was the higher speed for High res and focus stacking handheld. With the E.M1 mk 3 I could already get some very good results, but if there is some wind or insects are moving it is better when 10 to 15 images are taken as fast as possible. Here the OM1 really shines. What concerns the image quality it is very comparable to my E-M1 mark 2 and mark 3. At least I cannot see any major difference.
I just bought the OM-D E-M10 mark iv a couple of weeks ago and i must say i’m a bit disappointed about the camera. On top of that, somebody told me that micro 4/3 was dying.. 1st is that true? 2nd is it worth it for me to change and upgrade to the OM-1? I mostly do landscape photography.. Thank you!
Answer to the first question is no. OM-1 is a better camera than E-M10 Mark IV. Is it worth upgrading is hard to say for someone else. What problems do you have?
I have no real problems with the camera itself, i’m just disapponted with the performance.. i was expecting a lot more.. i know it’s an entry level camera compared to the OM-1, but still.. I mostly do landscape photography, but i’m not a professionnal like you.. i just want a camera that will last me 5-6 years and that i’ll be happy with.
Hi Peter. I have a question that I hope you, perhaps with Matt's support, can answer. I am very interested in the OM1 but I have several Lumix lenses (e.g., Leica 25, Leica 50-200, Lumic 12-35) and can't find any news about AF compatibility. Can you find any information? thanks 1000
It is usually a better thing to have the same brand lenses and camera. I have not tested any Panasonic/Leica lenses on my OM-1. I will what I can do about it.
I do not own the OM-1 (yet), but I have never had any problems using any or the Panasonic lenses with any or my OMD cameras. I currently own the E-M1x and have several Panasonic lenses that I love -- and that function fine. The big issue is that there will be some features such as Synch IS, Pro Capture HIgh CAF, and Focus Stacking that will only work with Olympus lenses.
YES, HANDLING AND USABILITY is very important - you can say this produces SYMPATHY to a camera. On the OMD 1 + 2 I've often have complications with the menue and settings. So it's good news if this is better now. Second is important the pure quality of pictures. You show us in one of your earlier videos, that in OM1 there is a leap in quality. Conclusion: if I had the money, I would buy the OM1. In future I will save money and sell my both older Olympus... so I hope to afford in 2024🐿️
Does anyone here (Peter?) know where I can get some sample OM-Log400 footage, preferably from the OM-1, straight-out-of-camera, for trying out the three different methods I know about to convert OM-Log400 to Rec.709? (I learned the three methods from Roger of Finland, Etchd Photography, and Cullen Kelly, a pro colorist who gave advice in one of his Q&A videos on how to handle log footage from cameras that the manufacturer does not supply a color profile for --- I don't mean a LUT, I mean real color management.)
I was rather shocked that the autofocus acquisition on the OM-1 in low light or low contrast (i.e. challenging) settings was much less reliable than on my OMD E5 Mark III. When using the same lens on the same scene, the OM-1 would struggle quite frustratingly to achieve focus, while the E5 would snap to focus. I'm not even talking about focus tracking or subject detection, just regular single photo mode. I would love to hear that I'm doing something wrong, but can't think what that would be.
Just a thought but have you got the AF illuminator switched off? Also it appears to be on the other side on the OM1 pretty close to where your middle finger is so it might be obstructing it.
If you think that more pixels is the answer to better images watch "New Olympus OM1 Sensor Large 540p" by Siegfried Seierlein. It's a very good explanation of the new sensor.
I have a fairly weird issue with my OM=1: every time I download photos on my PC and delete the contents of the memory card, the numbering of the photos starts from 001 again! Which of course is a serious problem! I went to my Olympus dealer and they sent an e-mail to Olympus customers service, but so far I have no answer. I could circonvent the issue by NOT deleting the pics afterI have downloaded them on my PC, but I make photos nearly every day and sooner of later my memory card will explode.. Has anyone an idea about that? It is something from the menu that I overlooked???
There are two things you can do. 1. You can set the camera so that it wont reset the counter to zero. Settings menu 1. Card/Folder/File Menu > File Name > Auto. It will start numbering where it left off. 2. Name you file in your computer and/or make a new folder for every photoshoot.
I don't have this camera (OM-1) nor any E-M1s. I think it is more logical to include human being in the Subject tracking AF menu. I also wish OMDS could develop more subjects (e.g. bee & butterfly) tracking which should appeal to many people (rather than train and airplane).
I heard that people have had great success using the bird tracking on bees and butterflies but I don’t own the om1 so I can’t give you any first hand experience.
@@Nathan-we8rz Thanks for the info. I saw a bird photographer (in youtube) using his Canon R5 to track a dragonfly in flight. I hope somebody can demonstrate the same with the OM-1.
When not a single gear reviewer .. even takes a pic of any Aircraft .....nevermind a train for that matter . I wish they would take images of high altitude aircraft when they review .. long reach lenses .. But that will sadly never happen
@@colintraveller why would you want a high altitude picture of an aircraft? Most people, like me for example, like to take pictures of military jets flying at lower altitudes for image quality and being able to see all the weaponry hanging off the bottom of the aircraft and the markings of the aircraft.
@@highwayman1224 You should know the answer before it was even asked ... If you regard yourself as an Aviation fanatic / Tog .. For the simple fact ... there is always something to CAPTURE .. IE Various Civillian Jet's/ Helo's ,,and Military .. IE C5 , C17 , RAF P8 Which i have captured flying overheard .
I’m stuck without my OM-1, it developed a fault, sis auto flashing red on lcd then the camera just shutdown. I have returned it for repair. It is now stuck in a warehouse waiting to be shipped to Portugal to be repaired. No idea how long it will take to get there, this is the response I got “Also, we would like to inform you, that the final implementation of Brexit in the UK, is leading to an extreme and unexpected situation, that we are working with our partners, but unfortunately, we are not able to impose any action from UK Government and Customs Processes/Guidelines. All imports into UK and export from the UK face severe delays due to the volumes at Customs from and into the UK. Independently of the provider being used, unfortunately, the outcome is the same. We are in close contact with the brokers working with our providers and trying to understand from the UK side if any action can be taken to expedite the solution. Unfortunately, we have to ask for your patience and understanding towards an issue we cannot control from our side. In the meantime, we have registered your serial number internally, so when it arrives at our repair center, we will inform you and prioritize its repair. “
Did you send it to OMDS or your dealer? It is usually faster if you send through OMDS service rather than through a dealer. Unfortunately,, the UK left the EU, which means custom clearance for goods between UK and the EU. Not much OMDS can do. I hope you get your camera back soon repaired.
@@ForsgardPeter I returned it to OMDS Peter, I understand it is out of there control. I still have my E-M1 Mkiii as my backup, luckily I did not sell it as planned. I’m missing the Bird detection though, now the Swifts, Swallows and Martins are back, it’s much harder to get good shots. A chance to improve my technique I suppose! Thanks for the reply and keep up the good work.
A typical cost-cutting measure, much to the consumer's chagrin. Service is being cut back and made worse. Just a few years ago, the camera manufacturers' representatives all had their own workshops in many countries. Nowadays, the defective camera is sent halfway around the world to a low-wage country for repair. Welcome to the neoliberalism of profit maximisation.
Here goes a subscribe for you, Pete. Thanks for the content! Got my OM-1 together with the 40-150 f.4 Pro today and hope it will finally be the camera to satisfy my needs for both photo and video. Looking forward to more content from you!
there is something wrong with this camera, and is that there is not stock on any place in Americas! i want the om-1 with 300mm f4, but i feel like an eternity to wait, i went to a camera store, and they almost convinced me to take a sony a7IV with the 200-600 G, is a cheaper combo! xD i will wait a little bit more tho just a little bit~
@T JB this was not on sale, the seller offer me instead Om-1 plus 300mm f4 cost 6450 CAD, the sony A7IV plus 200-600mm 5800 CAD plus a discount for that lens, i am waiting for the om-1 cuz i have some lenses m43, but my patient start to runs out xD i follow a guy that just changed his Z9 for the A1 seams better in AF
Hi Peter. I'm really enjoying the OM1. Overall it's a better Camera than the em1iii, but there are things I prefer on the old Camera. The front and rear control wheels were MUCH better and better positioned. The OM1 display has already lost the “click” when closed and opens by itself in the backpack, which can be a risk. The improvement in image quality is there, but I would have liked to have seen a better low light capability, because it's a BSI sensor and because they kept the 20mp. The battery cover seems to be of lower quality plastic (not a big problem), but over time I've had the impression that the em1iii is more robust and with a better quality feeling in the material. But that's it. Otherwise, I'm really curious if we'll have big FW Updates with improvements for both Cameras. The em1iii NEEDS to receive a major FW Update, and the OM1 has many aspects that could be improved, especially in the AF performance.
@@ForsgardPeter It's not the lack of the “click” (or safety lock) because the lock is there. But it just stopped to work properly as the plastic deteriorated in 1 month of use. It is really not a big deal, but the display opens by itself in the Bag… On the em1iii the display stays absolutely closed and there is no risk of opening while walking. I believe it is just a small defect in my Camera.
@@ForsgardPeter I found the source of the problem: the protective film I put on to protect the display is too thick. It has nothing to do with the quality of the plastic used. My mistake!
Probably some people here will hate me for pointing this out, but it is a completely new sensor and still lagging behind aps-c cameras released 8 YEARS AGO in terms of noise performance. it's not right. 20 mpix is totally fine and AF issues will get fixed in firmware updates. Most likely.
I beg to disagree. I have the EM1X, and the Nikon D500, and after all is said and done,it is very hard to tell the photos apart. If you go to my YT channel,I just uploaded a day at the lake where I used 4 different cameras, FF, APSC, and m4/3s and can you tell which is which? Cheers!
@@ridealongwithrandy Digital noise is a measurable factor and no personal preference, bias or belief can change that. This is not about pandering one brand over another, just plain facts. 8 year old Nikon D500 that you mentioned offer cleaner images than brand new OM-1. Does it matter in every situation? No. Are your pictures very nice? Yes. :) . Good luck.
I was ready to pull the trigger on an OM-1 with two lenses and had the items in my shopping basket at OM System's own online shopping site. But I have decided not to go ahead with the order. The reason is I did contact customer support with a question regarding the current promotion. This was three days ago and I still haven't heard a word back. And this is pre-sales we're talking about. If this is customer communication pre-sales how will it be post sales? Just not good enough. There is absolutely no way to contact them other than through a link on their website, but no answers.
![OM SYSTEM OM-1 - [20 NEW and EXCELLENT things I like!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jkA3gIa7Yqg/mqdefault.jpg)
3:06 I gulped when Peter put that very expensive camera on that narrow bridge rail!😱
I am a bird photographer. The two most important features are one, auto focus and two, frame rate. The OM1 is very good in the first, and outstanding in the second. The usable frame rate at 50 frames per second allows me to see things that I would otherwise miss.
Sorry, off topic, but I have to ask...is your moniker a Blues Brothers reference?
Takk!
What is the most important thing I look for in a camera (from your question at 6:00): contrast AF that works well in video without a face to track, lower / natural indoor light performance. Ergonomics cease to matter if the camera's electronics struggle to get the video and shots I'm after (struggling with focus, and noisy capture), even if the camera is comfortable to hold, and it is easy to adjust its settings. Although your point is well taken (about comfort and intuitive controls and menus), I'm willing to endure a bit of struggle if it means I end up with electronics that I can depend on to capture the shot I took at exactly the right moment, and at precisely the correct angle or panning movement. If it's noisy or out of focus, the fact it was comfortable to hold isn't worth anything.
Edit: The focus drift at 11:57 (your face is goes out of focus, and stays out of focus) is something I can't tolerate, and that's a perfect example of a hard fail for a camera for my use-case. By 12:18, the trees in the background are in perfect focus, but your face is not. Which camera was this shot with BTW? Sorry if I missed it and you mentioned that already.
This was shot with OM-1. There are some problems sometimes when a ND filter is used. There is just not enough light when the ND filter is very strong.
Most important camera attributes for me. First, is definitely how it interfaces with me. If the camera works like an extension of my hand and eye, then I will pick it up regularly, and enjoy the experience. Frankly, this is the main reason why I am so loyal to the Olympus/OMDS brand. Their cameras just seem to work naturally, and easily for me. Their light weight, ergonomic design, and intelligent interface layout don't get in the way of my usage; Second, is reliability. Actually, this is probably tied for first. It is absolutely essential that my gear work reliably every time. This is another reason why I am so loyal to Olympus. Their cameras have been consistently solid in that regard; Third, is lens selection and image quality. Honestly, these kind of go hand in hand. You can't get good images without good glass. That said, with good glass, pretty much any camera by any manufacturer can produce excellent images. The differences between brands and models when fitted with a good lens is pretty negligible in real world situations, which is why this is only number three on my list. That said, Olympus offers an excellent range of superb optics which makes their system even more compelling, especially when you compare the prices of good quality "full frame" lenses. They are so pricey as to almost rule themselves out of the contest in some cases. Well, that's about it for me.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I totally agree what you said about quality glass. It is really important.
Word! Exactly what I'm loving since 10 years when I switched to Olympus (EM-10i) It's pure joy to use this light and top quality gear
Very pleasant and very nice looking video!
Many thanks!
WOW! Peter! I finally have someone who explains why having 2 identical cameras is important. I have the EM1X and had the EM1 Mkii, so I purchased another EM1X so I could have identical cameras, and have the same setups and have no brain power working to think about the settings, and especially the buttons. I also like two cams because I go into nasty dirty dusty environments and have two lenses already mounted and no worries about changing lenses. I also setup one camera, then save the settings and write to the second camera. I also put a small yellow sticky inside the rear LCD to tell me what each C setting is, very helpful. And then the cameras are named X1, and X2, same with the SD cards in camera. That helps when downloading the photographs. I keep separate Lightroom catalogs for each X. I rekon that is my short primer for 2 identical cams:) Cheers!
It has been so much easier to work when both cameras are identical. I had the same situation when E-M1 was my main camera.
Yeah, using two bodies of the EM-1ii in wildlife photography changed all for me. However, with the new OM-1, I have just ordered the 150-400/4.5 Pro instead of a second OM-1 body.
I'll keep one of my EM-1ii as a second body
@@joerghummerjohann4854 that won’t last long. I have the the OM-1 and 150-400mm Pro and when you use subject detect with all AF points - and you see how fast the camera aquires the subject (way faster than even my R3 or my friends A1) - your EM1 Mkii will collect dust.
@@robertkeyghobad2981 You're probably right... hihi...but first I needed a good reason to invest in the 150-400...
I had purchased the Em1 Mk iii a while ago and found it fitted perfectly with what I like to shoot, when the OM-1 was announced I decided to put a deposit down ready for their arrival on the scene. It was fantastic to use, better grip, better battery life, bird detect, beautifully made etc, but three weeks ago it started playing up, wouldn't start, when did the autofocus was intermittent then the lcd screen started to play eg only showing vertical close spaced lines, ti is in the hands of Olympus Technicians here in New Zealand, at the moment I am very disappointed with the short amount of time I have been able to use it before breaking down ! I don't no as yet whether I will keep it, time will tell !
Usability and how it feels in my hand. EVF that works with my eyeglasses. Solid feel. A pleasing shutter sound. Responsive when turning on or waking up from sleep. Quick and reliable AF. Image quality is not an issue…it’s been good enough for all cameras for many years.
Magnificent camera! However, due to my finances, I am sticking with the OM-D E-M1 Mark II.
20Mp prints about 17” wide which is the width of my Epson printer. With the lens quality an upsized 24” x 20” looks perfect. I picked up my Nikon D850 with G2 Tamron 24-70 f2.8 last night after a few days with the OM. My god it is huge. I’ll be finishing my career with Olympus
Thx, good explanations.
I agree - ergonomics and usability are the most important aspects of a camera to me - given that the image quality is also okay. Bigger sensors and more pixels are always better, but not always necessary. A bigger sensor captures more light, and if you have more pixels you can crop more and there are more details in the image. Noise is not worse with more pixels, as many think, because the file doesn't need to be enlarged as much as a file with less pixels.
MfT is good enough for nearly everything, but I give it up in favour of a Nikon Z full frame system which produces cleaner files and gives me a wider latitude in post processing.
It's only a few years ago when we though a 5 or 8 megapixel image was a huge deal.
Most photojournalists made the leap to digital when 1mpg images became possible around the late '90s.
Local community colleges stopped teaching film photography when 12mpg was pretty much the standard (although that seems to be making a bit of a comeback; Not unlike vinyl recordings).
There have been so many print comparisons in onlne forums and, invariably, even the experts usually can't tell the difference without intense pixel-peeping.
20mpg is plenty unless your printing billboards and it's kind of a sweet spot.
Every camera out there today is capable of doing some pretty amazing stuff in the right hands
and, for me, the deal breaker is, simply, how does the camera feel in MY hands?
This is why I've stuck with Olympus since i jumped to digital from film almost 20 years ago and this is why I'm adding the OM-1to my collection now.
Thanks for sharing.
Lucky you, I’m still waiting for mine ordered on 22nd Feb from my local Park cameras.
I hope you get it soon!
I think you’re right about usability is the most important. It’s why I have one instead of using my phone.
Phone cameras are ok but the usability...
Thank you for sharing your experiences and impressions Peter. In regard to image quality at high ISO's, there is a definite and obvious improvement in my opinion. I recently compared the studio scene sample images from the OM-1 and the new Canon R7 over on the Imaging Resource site. At every ISO up to and including ISO 25600, the OM-1 shows clearly better results in both noise handling and image detail. The R7 is a less expensive camera, but it is also an APS-C sensor and one of Canon's latest cameras.
Also, thanks for explaining why you 'need' two OM-1's. Many people don't understand the importance of having two cameras with the same settings, controls, ergonomics, and menu system when you are shooting professionally. I shot weddings and corporate events professionally up until 2020, and always had two of the same camera bodies. As hectic and fast paced as events can be, the last thing a professional needs is to grab a second body and have to remember where controls are, or how to change an important setting.
Very interesting point about the R7 comparison, Greg. I guess this bodes well for the upcoming E-M5 camera that's supposed to be released this month! It has the same sensor at the OM-1, so you will have APSC quality images at a consumer friendly price point.
Great interesting video. I’m still waiting on my OM-1. I like a camera that is easy to operate out of the box, then I will start using the extra features.
On handling and usability: When I purchased my first Olympus camera I chose the E-M10 MKII over the E-M10 MKIII because it felt better in my hand and some of the feautures of the MKII were removed from the MKIII.
Ha! Exact same reasons here! Still love that old mark 2.
@@jooyoonchung3593 Good to hear! :-)
This camera will put OM back up with the leaders as far as video specs and sensor specs. Not that there was much wrong with its predecessor. The video specs in particular are useful for professional videographers.
As far as sensor size goes, 20 megapixels surpasses 35mm film resolution and is more than enough to fit on a 65inch UHD screen. The data and processing requirements for this size image are also manageable for my current home setup as an amateur photographer. So in that respect I do not want or require larger images.
I will probably start saving up to get an OM1.
Thanks Peter. Regarding the most important features, I’d add affordability to the list. As a bird photographer, my OM1 gives so much more for my money than alternative formats.
That is the point I keep telling people. The features are phenomenal.
I think it’s around the same price that I payed for my E-M1 mark II, when bought new. If you to take in to account inflation. This new camera is actually cheaper than the mark II.
Thank you for making this! I've gotten to finally play with the OM-1! I love a lot about it including the handling! The biggest thing for me that I was worried about was if they strayed too far from the E-m1 and I'm just glad they didn't. I do find that it's is actually a bit bigger if you're holding it for hours. I find that the slightly bigger grip adds just a slight amount more stress on my fingers. Not much but it's definitely there. I also find that I don't like the recessed dials. The slight slant and exterior dials on the E-M1.2/3 body is definitely easier for me to handle. However, this is most likely because I have used the E-M1.2 since 2016-17.
Performance wise, I do find it much much faster than the E-M1.2. I'm able to get through my jobs faster! Live Comp is something I use weekly and the OM-1 processes it SO QUICKLY! I also find that the faster processing of the HHHR makes it better with flashes as well, the sync speed is faster with High Res mode now I no longer have to carry an extra light to compensate when using High Res mode for product shots.
Thanls a lot, dear Peter! I'm very happy obout my OM-1, I still have to study some details, but the upgrade from EM1ii was a quantum step forward for me, espacially for bird photography. And the handling is better, too
Great to hear!
The ‘quantum step forward’ is full-frame. Four times more total light, two stops less noise. Better tonal transitions. Also resolutions up to 60MP. Just saying.
@@dafyddmills6659 I disagree on that. I know the pros and cons of the different formats and I shot FF during the film days.
Photography of wildlife, especially of birds in flight with the new light gear of MFT is just another type of photography, how you - as a photographer - can react quickly to the situations in nature, which is only possible with light weight gear.
In addition to excellent tech such as OM-1 combined with the 150-400/4.5 Pro.
See e.g. Mike Lanes competition of the OM-1 with Sony Alpha A1. for bird photography. A honest trial.
Finally , Mike have chosen the OM-1.
He just liked to shoot with it more and with more pleasure (besides of all the tech comparisons he made; for him both systems are in the same "league")
This might not be the case for all photographers. Everybody should choose by his/hers own preferences and type of projects.
But finally: OMDS made a fantastic job to stay in this business and not behind.
Good video quality and good sound... straight out of camera or did you color grade? What mic setup did you use? Also, not a lot of movement or difficult situations , but AF seemed spot on....
Thanks. There is slight color grading. It was shot using H.265. It is better than H.264. The sound was recorded using Ride Wireless Go. It was also slightly tweaked.
Yes the AF and face Priority works well.
Focus is my number one priority. Nothing else matters if you can’t nail the focus. I have the EM1.2, which I really like, and I shot with the EMX. The focus system for action simply does not compare with any of the recent Canon, Nikon or Sony cameras I have owned. I find it hard to judge reviewer opinions on AF, as they rarely compare to the best, like my Sony A1. This feature always seems to get over hyped on Olympus cameras. Maybe the OM1 has closed the gap. I’m interested to hear from someone that also shoots with an R5, A1 or Z9. I’m not expecting parity, given the cost difference. What I love about the Olympus cameras is the weight with lenses and the superb ergonomics for focus stacking. Cheers.
Of course AF is important like many other features. I still feel that camera that is to use and it feels good is very important.
Agree this on EM1.2. Always felt AF is randomly there when shooting fast mountainbiking in woods. No nailing and very often busted hi ISO for ETTR. Imo this AF&hiISO together is very limiting in action shooting when in the woods or dim light. So even if there is nailed shot there is hiISO to deal with. I know you can buy a one more software for noise but it is NOT my way what comes algorithms on picture and my photography. Also like ergonomics and I think it is more needed for BIF with tele.
The OM-1 AF isn’t even in the same universe as current Canon, Nikon or Sony AF.
I am actually glad that OM System stayed at 20 MP with this camera's sensor. The plain physics of digital photography dictate that as long as you are incorporating a Bayer array, increasing the pixel/area ratio also increases the low-light color noise, all other things remaining constant. That has always been my biggest challenge with m4/3 (and 4/3) photography, especially when shooting at night. Almost all of the prints that I sell are 16x20 and even with significant cropping, 20 MP has produced perfectly crisp images. Perhaps if I was going as large as 24x30 prints, those 20 MP images might become an issue, but even then the resolution of a print that large would still be far more detailed than what I ever produced back when I was printing from 35mm film.
Brilliant comment ( physics rule :) ) also the articulation is on point, thanks for contributing.
The sensor probably is the Sony IMX 472. Sony says it’s a Quad Bayer sensor.Dpreview says it’s not. If you you use terminology like some phone companies do, you could say it’s a 80 Mpixel sensor!😃
What do I want in the first firmware update? Fix the AF tracking , make me a happy Chappie. BTW Peter, I have shot over 12000 bird images with the 100-400 in the last 2 months. Ihave found that I get the best results by having a base ISO set at ISO 1000, most images shot at 400mm so f6.3 or f7.1-8 and appropriate SS.When I get it right in low light the results are impressive,not quite as good as my friend and his 150-400mm,now there is a sharp lens.Cheers for now and thanks for your views.
Thanks for the tip. I will try that once i get my 100-400mm lens.
Improved AF performance is allways the most important thing I look out for. All the time 100% sharp portraits is the only thing I would invest on.
Good to get your thoughts on this excellent looking camera Peter. It looks a good option for wildlife photographers for sure escpecially given the range of lenses available.
20mp is perfect, I prefer to have less pixels and better iso performance. Usability and versatility are my main camera choice features and Olympus cameras have check them both for quite a while now. Regarding to sensor resolution, nowadays the quality of image editing software is so good that you can boost the size of a 20mp image to very large formats for fine art prints. I'm geting an OM1 next year.
I agree that megapixels are not that important. If needed more, software like Gigapixel AI is a good solution.
Hello Peter. I worked 45 years as a professional Photographer with two systems. First 25 years Nikon. In the late nineties I had to switch to Canon because They came with digital cameras. Nikon also tried but they lost it with bad camera's and bad quality. I worked about 15 years with EOS 1D(16 MP) and Canon EOS ds(mark11 and 111) (20 mp 7900 euro. a lot of money). Now I see the discussions about sensors, dynamic range and so on. I never had clients who asked me that. . They only looked to the quality of the pictures, Since 3 month I make pictures with a DJI Mini 3 drone. The quality of such a little camera with such a little sensor is amazing. Now I am investing in a Micro Four Third system. OM-systems seems my favorite. Why, because the quality of the body and pictures, the compact lenses, the autofocus system etc. The technical revolution of electronic camera's is so fast that investing in a very expensive system(Canon, Nikon and Sony high end) is not responsible. The OM1-system is the only high end professional system on the market for a responsible price. I would like that the OM DE M1X in 2023 can get the specifications of the OM 1 because the body and weight fits more for my professional use. Nobody can give me an answer what OM-stems is going to do with that body. When not, I am going for the OM 1 with battery holder 24-40 2.8 pro for daily work , 50-150 2.8 pro for sports etc). VIVA OM Systems
Thanks for sharing.
I agree that handling and ergonomics in general are two of the most important things in a camera body for me. While I trust the Olympus ergonomics, for my first mirrorless Olympus I chose the OM-D E-M1X strictly because I knew the ergonomics would work for me. Prior to that I only used an E420 which handled like a charm for me. I know for a fact that handling is so important to me because I mostly shoot Nikon and my Olympus gear is mostly used as a means to break the routine and get a different inspiration; however, I have an exceptionally well specced body (Z7II) but the handling just doesn't work for me for some reason so the body is collecting dust. People seem to be big on AF and AF tracking these days which is something I don't even think about when I purchase a camera, and in terms of image quality, I still like the results I get from the E420 and I'm much more happy to carry it around and shoot with it all day rather than shooting with the much more advanced Z7II just for the sake of ergonomics! So, I guess we are very much alike in this respect.
Well said. I could say that we think alike in that sense that ergonomics and usability is very important.
Interesting experiences. Some comments/questions...
1. I've had the reported problems with eye/face detection, too.
2. In addition, I also had problems with the EM-1.iii in that eye/face detection "detected" faces where there were none, e.g., based on some pattern in trees.
3. My temporary solution to #2 has been to set up the AE-ON button to *not* use eye/face detection, while the shutter release button uses eye/face detection. This way, I can focus without eye/face detection when the algorithm gets into trouble.
4. Your comment kind of "ruins" my solution... if I need to set up the entire sensor as focus area in order to get eye/face detection to work, I guess the same focus area is used with AE-ON... The same problem would be there if I program another button to toggle eye/face detection, because one would also need to change the focus area (+ change to C-AF?)
5. If my understanding is correct, the best choice would probably be to use one of the Custom modes (e.g., C1) for eye detection??
6. Also, I don't quite understand why eye/face detection is not categorized as one of the Subject Detection modes. That way, we could toggle Subject Detection by a programmed button, and use hold+rotate the back wheel to choose which mode to use.
I don't know if I have properly understood this, though, but am curious about your thoughts.
Good points. I have set up C2 to use face/eye priority. C1 is for everyday photography and face/eye priority is off. I think the eye and face priority is not in Subject recognition because face and Eye priority has been in Olympus cameras for years.
@@ForsgardPeter I think you are right wrt. why eye priority has not been grouped with Subject recognition. Still, I think that *logically*, it belongs with Subject recognition -- and that would also make the OM-1 simpler to set up.
On the other hand -- perhaps it is simpler to move the new menu system to older cameras if they keep eye priority as a separate choice.
I'm using my OM-1 also for a bit more than 2 months, super happy with it. The only thing that I noticed, is that the AI Face Detection has some troubles with toddler faces. When a toddler for example stands in front of me and an adult faaaar in the background... the AI takes the adult into focus who stands meters behind the child. You can correct it quickly by moving the camera a bit. But happens rarely, very rarely.
But my R6 had also in the beginning troubles with the AI Face Detection. Nothing that can't be fixed with the Firmware in the future.
Greetings from Espoo.
That is interesting about the face detection and toddlers. Thanks for the info.
That would be a deal breaker for me. Thank you for the information.
@@matthiasbruns8570 Hmmm... I wrote an answer but it didn't appear. Or was it direct to you? Whatever will write it again.
The face detection works fine, it happens only sometimes that the AI has some troubles. But this was with my Canon R and R6 exactly the same. But after two updates of the firmware it was better/gone. I do only children's photography with the OM-1, and I'm more than happy with it. I never had a camera with perfect firmware from the beginning. Normally all "problems" are gone with one or two updates - as mentioned the Canon R and R6 were also sometimes clumsy with the detection with the first firmware.
Hi Peter, thankyou for another great video, I am in the process of selling my extensive range of Canon cameras and high end lenses to make this exciting transition to 4/3rds photography, and have really enjoyed the many informative, and honest videos you have released supporting this system and I'm convinced this new release from OM Systems will be my preferred new pathway. I am mostly a landscape and nightscape photographer, so would really value your opinion on lens for milkyway and aurora photography.
OM SYSTEM does not have fast super wide lens. The 8mm f1.8 Fish-eye is one option, but fish-eye is not for everyone. I know I should not sat this, but Laowa 10mm f2 is a great lens. It is MF. That is most likely not that big deal in astrophotography.
Nice video. The optional battery grip is quite pricey. At least they finally added the joystick for selecting the focus point. Being a hobby and retired, can't justify the costs.
Unfortunately it is a bit pricey.
Totally agree that usability is what I look for first and foremost. Can't expect much change in IQ @ 20Mpix, or even 24Mpix that would make a practical difference, so I'm happy that OMDS stucked to 20Mpix, which is more that what 99% of people's true need. What I'd like to see is a video focussed on S-AF performance, which is reported to be below expectations.
The AF settings have to be set a bit differently than before. I have not had any issues other than the ones I was talking about in the video. That was the AF area and C-AF.
5/16/22 Has the new OM-System camera added built-in GPS recording, I have this built into my older Sony Bridge camera and find it very accurate at recording the location I took the photo from. Taking several hundred photos when I am out and about makes it easy for me not to have to worry later on about my memory of the photos that were taken from, plus it provides me with the details if I am off the beaten path to go back with no issues. Having to use blue-tooth to a cell phone is unnecessary steps that were solved years back that should be part of the OS built into the camera since the newer camera has longer battery life. So Peter what are your views on this issue?
OM-1 does not have built-in GPS. You can track the locations with your mobile phone and then transfer the data into your images. There are some good things about this method, but also not so good. The only Olympus camera that has built-in GPS is E-M1X and then TG-series cameras have it too.OM-1 is built for outdoor and wildlife photographers so I would not mind if the GPS was built-in. Not sure why it has been left out. Maybe it is the size?
Thanks very useful.
Glad to hear that!
OM 1 is an excellent camera! Now put all those features on an EM5 size body and that will be a no brainer, a perfect camera for me!!
You talked about ‘when using ND filter….’ Ithought there is a possibility to activate a digital ND in this camera? I have a Panasonic G80, but use my Sony AIII for low light circumstances , concerts , events, with moving objects . Wonder if the OM1 would as usabal for low light instead as the Sony ff is ?
If you do a lot of low light photography of course bigger sensor gives advantages what it comes to IQ. On the other sometimes having a smaller system might have advantages. With the noise reduction software like DxO Pure RAW2 or Topaz DeNoise AI can help a lot.
@@ForsgardPeter Thank you Peter for your helpfull response !
Do you think the larger grip will work just as well for women and people with smaller hands? I've never thought about the size of a grip before.
I do not think it is too big unless your hand is very small. It is quite well designed grip.
I have normal size hands and I love this camera! I'm not a proffessional photographer but I have used more advanced cameras for about 10 years and I find all omd 1 cameras from omd 1 mark ll to this camera fun and easy to work with. I did not need the om-1, l just couldn't resist it and had the money to buy it and I love it. 😉
As a bird photographer for the last 10 years I never needed frame rate more than 10 frames per second. So the new 50 f/s in the OM-1 is not important for me. I don't care for the 60fr/s in 4K video as well. I thing 30f/s is enough. If I buy camera for video I would buy GH6. The AF is the only good reason to buy that camera. But Olympus firmware update adds bird detection AF to the flagship E-M1X which has a pretty decent autofocus already and a dual battery that works as one. 2500 shots without changing the battery plus the ability to use 2 fast UHS-II cards tipped the scales to cancel the order for OM-1 which I have been waiting for since March and I would wait at least until the end of June. And ordered E-M1X. I was lucky enough to buy it for only $ 1060 from Ebay on 9000 shots alone. Separately, this deal saved me $ 1,100 not to buy the $2200 OM-1. Tomorrow I will have the opportunity to test it and I hope will work well with the Olympus 300mm F4 + 1.4TC lens mainly for wildlife photography. I can also make a video here on TH-cam for comparison with my Canon 5DS and 400mm F4 DO IS II USM + 1.4 TC lens which is absolutely equal to the magnification of the M 4/3 configuration. If I have a decent result from the more compact M 4/3 configuration I can switch from Canon to it.
E-M1X is still quite capable for bird photography. It has some advantages over OM-1, like the two batteries you mentioned. By the way OM-1 has two UHS-II card slots too.
@@ForsgardPeter It's good to know. I just like the look and feel on the E-M1X. If I order battery grip for the OM-1 which is only an available backorder of course and that adds me another $ 350. Extra battery and we go to $ 2650 for the OM-1. Nearly $ 1,600 more than I currently have for the E-M1X. And by the way, today I tested it, the camera works amazingly for me. As the video by hand with amazing stabilization and for BF the AF works really well with the new bird detection mode. I know the OM-1 may be better in AF performance but the E-M1X is enough for my needs. Not to mention that after the sale of canon lenses and cameras I will get back another $ 6000- $ 7000 :). Good Luck!
fps is one of those things you don't think you need, until you try it, than it's hard to live w/o. If you shoot BIF, doubling your fps can net you many more keepers, and capture moments you didn't know you were missing.
@@taylorhickman84 And a whole day photos to inspect and delete :) . Good Luck I will stack to 10 fps. I am good even with 7 fps.
Is it someway possibility to look lenses? and what third part lenses you can use (eg with adapter) and what limitations. Also it wuold be also intresting to know other four-thirds maker lens suitability lens selection, how they fit to new OM-1. Area is large, but at least you should have proper connections?
In theory yes, but in practise it would be hard to get hold of all the different lenses. The amount of lenses is so vast that it would be impossible.
Practically all the native m4/3 lenses are compatible. There might be some restrictions with Lens IS with other brands. There is always the IBIS that can be used.
If the noise performance is not significantly better, why we should spend more money for tris one?
Well, it is better. With OM-1 I can use 25600 and with E-M1 Mark III ISO6400 is the maximum.
My big concern is usability when I take pictures for my radio club, and when doing photos with and for Sandra. If I am asked for a photo that needs changing camera settings - if that takes five minutes, it is a disaster. Same thing when I do stills of a harbor scene, and a ship starts moving. Has the ship gone by the time I have the correct settings on the OM-1? Last Sunday I got stills and video on the E-M10 IV, when the MARSDEN BAY started its departure. The video using both got me a compliment on FaceBook. My cameras have to fit in with my environment, the same as I have to.
I find that handling is unique to just about every camera Ihave used. I’ve adapted to all of them over the years, and the favorite is always the LAST one. ProCapture is a bit attraction for me, and IS is really important. Third for me is autofocus (I’m not getting any younger).
BTW, I'm more than happy with 20mpix.
Two technical questions I've been wondering about:
1. If I set the OM-1 to store *only RAW* files to the SD cards, and I use a computational mode that produces JPG files -- what will happen? Will the camera still store the JPG files, or will the results get lost?
2. Can I assign buttons to different operations/choices in different custom modes? In other words, can I use the AEL button for one purpose in mode C1, and for another in mode C2? [Not sure that it is a good idea, though...]
1. it will record a jpg to the card.
2. Yes you can.
I am not sure I agree on the AF face detect is as reliable as my old m1.2. I have tried having AF using the whole frame it helps a bit but make it totally unpredictable when no face is detected. I have two IM-1’s and the behave they both behave the same way. I have some travel coming up and I am concidering taking the m1.2 with me instead.
Is the shoulder strap always cheap and sharp or is it finally soft and comfortable?
I have not even opened the shoulder strap package. There are two reasons I do not use them. First I mostly use wrist strap and the shoulder strap screams the brand. Not that I mind, but it shines and draws attention to the camera. That is something I do not want when going out and photograph.
I use the EM1 MIII and am fine with the IQ. I sell my work at a gallery and my clients have no idea what camera I use and Mega pixel it is!
Having owned a lumix G9 for close to a year and loving pretty much every about it EXCEPT for the crappy autofocus when trying to get BIF or military jets, I'm really interested in the OM-1. From the videos I've seen on TH-cam I think the autofocus of the OM-1 looks far superior to the G9. I think even with my Leica lenses, 100-400mm and 12-60mm it should be superior to the G9. My olympus 60mm macro would probably be a little nicer on the OM-1 as well. Very good video, thank you for such an in depth review.
I'm in the same boat. I am doing more wildlife and BIF and the G9 just doesn't cut it sometimes. Lots of shots slightly out of focus if it can grab focus at all. Birds are almost impossible. Between that and that computation photography features in the OM-1, it is a really compelling offer.
I commented on you first post about this camera with my own opinion that I thought it was too expensive. The Canon APC model released today is more like the price I think the OM1 should have been but obviously I am in the minority.
I know that 2000€ is a lot of money. On the other hand the value for money is very good. The features are top class. I watched a few videos about the new Canons. Interesting choice to use a APS-C size sensor. The R7 looked were competitive. Not sure if a FF lens is optimal on a APS-C sensor. I once had an APS-C canon, Canon 7D and used only FF lenses, but the sharpness was not very good. It was ok with EF-S lenses. Not sure if that is case today.
Usability is paramount for me.
Great video Peter, but for some reason I did not see the links to videos that you mentioned during this one ? I have a special place in my heart for the Olympus!
What links did you find missing? I need to check and correct.
@@ForsgardPeter Like for instance when you point to the top right corner of the screen and say "You can find it here" there is no link there :)
Hi Peter, I am using the E-M1 Mk II and the E-M1x. I have big hands and kind of "wide" thumbs... I appreciate a generous space available to place my right hand thumb on the back of the camera. The Mk II is fine in this regard, but especially the E-M1x. I tried the Mk III in a local store but found that my thumb was also touching the joystick, which was not nice. As I do a lot of bird photography, often in cold weather, this issue becomes even more pressing. Is the OM-1possible to use conveniently using winter gloves. Is there enough space ?? What is your experience ?
I did not have problems with gloves except using the back wheel needs a slightly different position of my hand.
Check my post above, I have 2 X's Cheers!
I read in a review that the OM-1's viewfinder is worse for eyeglass wearers because of the higher magnification. The viewfinder of the E-M1lll is more comfortable and you can see the corners of the image better when shooting with glasses. Is that true?
I have not really found any problems. Maybe I am so used to it? It is always a bit harder to see the whole area with glasses on.
Superb
Hey Peter great video. I have a Panasonic g7. I was thinking about upgrade to the om-1. What is your opinion
Very hard to say. Are there features that you need? I have never tested G7 so I cannot say about that camera very much.
I use the em10 mark ii as it is the smallest camers for travel but i still havent found a reason to upgrade to the 3 or 4. Some of the features of the mark 2 are still not present in the mark 4 such as the small af point. Id love to see pdaf in a mark 5 version, better IS, the small af point and a return to metal top and bottom plates.
I have both the Markll and MarklV. AF is massively better with the MarklV and it is much lighter. Nevertheless, I will sell it again and keep my Markll. I like the flat grip of the Markll, the more personalisable magnifier function (for old MF lenses), the small AF point and the ability to see the info data in the viewfinder outside the image field. Also, the dials on the MarklV feels cheaper. I still use an E-M5lll as my main camera, which is superior in all respects to my two E-M10s and the best camera i've ever had. But for some macros i like the tilting display of the E-M10 better.
Excellent reflections as usual. for me a camera must be ergonomic and have high operating speed. (I can't wait for electronics). Excellent choice not to increase the resolution. 20 megapixels is already enough for such a small sensor. In my opinion it was also fine with 16mp. i print 30x45cm with a 12mp fullframe. By now Today all the cameras have excellent photographic quality and even exaggerated bursts. (does a sports photographer really need more than ten fps)
Hello, Peter. Could you please test if there is overheating problem. Specially in cinema 4k 60 fps. I need to record at least for 2h. Thank you.,
I have tested it and it was not a problem. If i remember correctly it was in this video: th-cam.com/video/jkA3gIa7Yqg/w-d-xo.html
@@ForsgardPeter Thank you. I ll check.
@@ForsgardPeter I see you made 1h 4k 25 fps. Could you be so kind and try 2h cinema 4k 60 fps at 22 °c or higher. If this works i would probably sell my em1x or em1iii and go to om1. Thank you very much.
It's really funny that this digital camera has the same name as the OM-1 from 1971 - which is why I clicked on this video link 🤣🤣
But now that I watched the digital OM-1 video, it seems to be a great camera for the MFT crowd, much focused on action and speed. Still I would love if they do an upgrade to the digital PEN-F from 2016!
They used Reborn as a slogan for this camera.
Hi Peter¡ I am about to purchase the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III , what lense would you recommend for portrait picture
Either M.Zuiko 45mm f1.8 or 45mm f1.2 Pro. The 75mm f1.8 is also an option. It is a bit long for portraits for my taste, but it is an excellent lens.
@@ForsgardPeter Thanks!
Does this model EVF blacked out when wearing sunglasses like E-M1X?
No idea. Never heard that before. Something I have to test.
@@ForsgardPeter It’s A problem with Polaroid sun glasses. The OM-1 doesn’t have this problem, at least that’s what I have heard.
Regarding megapixels, I think it would be nice for composition since it makes cropping more merciful but isn't entirely necessary. My interest with the OM-1 is how the new stacked sensor will develop. Its appearance is essentially a herald for some really exciting developments to be done in the next couple of years. I for one would leap at the chance to get an improved Pen camera if they released one once the sensor matures a little. Would also like to see third-party lens makers like tamron take an interest in MFT a lil more so we could have some more budget options. OM glass is amazing but can be a little prohibitive in cost at the greater zoom ranges for hobbyists.
Well, instead of cropping I prefer to to take a lens with more tele reach instead.
@@friatankar if you can do that that is great. However you have to admit that some of the longer reaching lenses for MFT are rather costly and not always reasonable for everyone to afford.
@@jessebraughler8594 the 100-400 mm with mc14 gives me enough. The 150-400, I can only wish for.
8MP was enough for me. But that doesn't mean I say no to 20. The lenses, camera, SD cards, current PCs seem to handle it w/o problems, so I don't see any downsides with it.
Another great video! Still hoping for a new OM5 with stacked sensor though :D As for 24 or 26 MP... I doubt most MFT lenses are really designed for this very dense amount of megapixels. For me it would not really worth the additional cost for lenses & camera. It sounds a lot but I usually don't see that much of a difference on other cameras. Of course the difference usually gets obvious around 30+ MP but I don't think that would be the right direction for MFT. As for H265... I've come to like this codec (so much more compact than prores and quite flexible). It's great that it's also included here, but it's definitely not the easiest format to edit even on a good PC (of course it also depends on the hardware setup)
Similar mindset like yours,… Man thats what i only wish for, if the GH6 managed to push 25.2 mp i don’t see why OM can’t?!…
just imagine that camera phones with half inch sensors are pushing 48 mp, 64 mp and even 108 mp… i don’t see why MFT technology cant push at least minimum to 33 mp… it would be great for large printing… 🤷♂️
@@matttheking1655 the thing is, megapixel on smartphones is usually just cool numbers on paper, it's great for advertising. In reality a proper professional 20MP camera will likely outperform a 40MP smartphone in terms of detail and quality. And in some cases the high MP count on smartphone is very limiting in terms of camera settings (lower aperture values and stuff like that...) Besides, I have yet to see GH6 footage where the additional MP really made a significant difference. I think the potential downsides is not worth it at this point. At least not for me.
Thanks Matthias!
@@matthiasglanznig9733 Good point of view👌
@@matttheking1655 The GH6 is marketed towards people wanting optimum video imaging. But, if you're shooting video with a 16:9 aspect ratio, you're losing 25% of the sensor area on a M4/3 camera, unless you are using an anamorphic lens. Those additional MPs are useful for recording widescreen images. The OM-1, while quite competent at shooting video, is first aimed at still photography, where there are certain advantages to lower pixel density.
I use aperture priority most of the time and "drive" the camera by changing aperture, ISO and exposure compensation. It's therefore essential for me that these three things are easy to do, which they are on my 3 Olympuses.
Peter, do you use high resolution mode, which I think goes up to 80 pixels?
Or possibly even megapixels 😃
I have not tested the 80Mpix highres shot. I have only used the 50Mpix hand held so far.
I reduce the contrast on my pen f to increase dynamic range….. any opinion on that?
It is a good idea.
I know that a lot of people think this doesn't matter that much, and in many ways I agree but I would like to see a 43 megapixel om systems camera. I am very happy with my 20 megapixel E-M1 iii. If an OM-1X (E-M1X ii) came out with 40+ megapixel, I would be willing to spend $3000+ for it. That being said, I think this is where OM needs to go. If they want to become one of the most sought after nature wildlife cameras, they will do 3 things to compete with Sony/Canon/Nikon: 1) Keep the similar performance to OM-1 (maybe 24 frames per second would suffice), 2) bump the megapixels to compete with the R5, and 3) put a big emphasis on video features. Look, I am extremely happy with what I have, but I want my investment to keep winning financially, and imagine how many people would prefer the lightweight portability of micro 4/3, but the detail and flexibility of having larger files for cropping, and higher res video and/or more video fidelity: i think this is the winning formula for OM, and micro 4/3 as a whole
At the moment I think the 20Mpix + something is the maximum amount of pixels that m4/3 can handle with the existing technology. It is a good compromise. Of course,, if the demand is something more, they should consider adding more megapixels.
Image quality is priority 1
Hi Peter, do the right hand side dials become easier to spin over time? I just upgraded from a G85 and the new dials are a bit painful for my fingertips when I’m scrolling through the gallery. It takes a lot more force to spin the dial than my old camera. Thanks!
Hard to say, it remains to be seen. In older models not that much.
Hi Peter, I'm confused as on a few reviews (or comment sections), people are stating that noise levels look very similar to the E-M1 Mark III, then they add that noise is much more easily reduced in post - probably a different grain structure or pattern, I don't know, or perhaps the improved DR helps in having less noise in the shadow areas etc. Do you have any take on this? If confirmed, perhaps the noise performance at high iso has actually improved quite a lot (though not really a 2 stops improvement as claimed initially).
I compared the quality in this video: th-cam.com/video/xWcVWNWhrE0/w-d-xo.html I found big deferences.
@@ForsgardPeter Thanks, just watched it. Finally a sensible comparison, well done Peter.
I found that the C-AF center priority doesn’t work well as the previous model…… do you?
Have not noticed, but I will check that out.
Peter, I basically agree with everything you said . I use the OM 1 now for approximately 40 days. I can easily compare the OM 1 to my E-M1 III which I still use when i am lazy to change lenses. The reason I bought the OM 1 are the numerous slight improvements ( new sensor, AF, noise etc. ), but most important to me was the higher speed for High res and focus stacking handheld. With the E.M1 mk 3 I could already get some very good results, but if there is some wind or insects are moving it is better when 10 to 15 images are taken as fast as possible. Here the OM1 really shines. What concerns the image quality it is very comparable to my E-M1 mark 2 and mark 3. At least I cannot see any major difference.
There is difference in high ISO, but really with lower ISO.
I just bought the OM-D E-M10 mark iv a couple of weeks ago and i must say i’m a bit disappointed about the camera. On top of that, somebody told me that micro 4/3 was dying..
1st is that true?
2nd is it worth it for me to change and upgrade to the OM-1? I mostly do landscape photography..
Thank you!
Answer to the first question is no. OM-1 is a better camera than E-M10 Mark IV. Is it worth upgrading is hard to say for someone else.
What problems do you have?
I have no real problems with the camera itself, i’m just disapponted with the performance.. i was expecting a lot more.. i know it’s an entry level camera compared to the OM-1, but still..
I mostly do landscape photography, but i’m not a professionnal like you..
i just want a camera that will last me 5-6 years and that i’ll be happy with.
Hi Peter. I have a question that I hope you, perhaps with Matt's support, can answer. I am very interested in the OM1 but I have several Lumix lenses (e.g., Leica 25, Leica 50-200, Lumic 12-35) and can't find any news about AF compatibility. Can you find any information? thanks 1000
It is usually a better thing to have the same brand lenses and camera. I have not tested any Panasonic/Leica lenses on my OM-1. I will what I can do about it.
I do not own the OM-1 (yet), but I have never had any problems using any or the Panasonic lenses with any or my OMD cameras. I currently own the E-M1x and have several Panasonic lenses that I love -- and that function fine. The big issue is that there will be some features such as Synch IS, Pro Capture HIgh CAF, and Focus Stacking that will only work with Olympus lenses.
Next cameras: OM-5 and OM-10?
Most likely.
YES, HANDLING AND USABILITY is very important - you can say this produces SYMPATHY to a camera.
On the OMD 1 + 2 I've often have complications with the menue and settings. So it's good news if this is better now.
Second is important the pure quality of pictures. You show us in one of your earlier videos, that in OM1 there is a leap in quality.
Conclusion: if I had the money, I would buy the OM1. In future I will save money and sell my both older Olympus... so I hope to afford in 2024🐿️
Cant get one for love or money here in the UK. What's going on? Perhaps there are only two guys working in the factory? Going from Wow to Huh.
I’m still waiting for one in the UK too, maybe if the ambassadors weren’t doubling up the everyday photographers might stand a chance 😏
@@pexeu1966 Good point Barry!
@@pexeu1966 3-4 years and there might be Peters om-1 for sale😀
Sorry to hear. I hope you all get yours soon! Ai like your idea @veiko p. :D
@@ForsgardPeter Thanks, Peter. Love the round up from your point of view.
why this OM1 is so expensive ? Some other OM1 model can find for 160 euros online, i dont understand
Those are film cameras from the 70s'. This one was launched last spring and is a digital one.
Does anyone here (Peter?) know where I can get some sample OM-Log400 footage, preferably from the OM-1, straight-out-of-camera, for trying out the three different methods I know about to convert OM-Log400 to Rec.709? (I learned the three methods from Roger of Finland, Etchd Photography, and Cullen Kelly, a pro colorist who gave advice in one of his Q&A videos on how to handle log footage from cameras that the manufacturer does not supply a color profile for --- I don't mean a LUT, I mean real color management.)
Send me an email so I can send a clip.
I was rather shocked that the autofocus acquisition on the OM-1 in low light or low contrast (i.e. challenging) settings was much less reliable than on my OMD E5 Mark III. When using the same lens on the same scene, the OM-1 would struggle quite frustratingly to achieve focus, while the E5 would snap to focus. I'm not even talking about focus tracking or subject detection, just regular single photo mode. I would love to hear that I'm doing something wrong, but can't think what that would be.
I have only had some challenges with Face Detect at first, but now it is ok when I have the right settings.
Just a thought but have you got the AF illuminator switched off? Also it appears to be on the other side on the OM1 pretty close to where your middle finger is so it might be obstructing it.
@@caw25sha Thanks for the tip, I'll check it out.
If you think that more pixels is the answer to better images watch "New Olympus OM1 Sensor Large 540p" by Siegfried Seierlein. It's a very good explanation of the new sensor.
Thanks for the tip. I will!
I have a fairly weird issue with my OM=1: every time I download photos on my PC and delete the contents of the memory card, the numbering of the photos starts from 001 again! Which of course is a serious problem! I went to my Olympus dealer and they sent an e-mail to Olympus customers service, but so far I have no answer. I could circonvent the issue by NOT deleting the pics afterI have downloaded them on my PC, but I make photos nearly every day and sooner of later my memory card will explode..
Has anyone an idea about that? It is something from the menu that I overlooked???
There are some good renaming apps (The free Ant Renamer for Windows for example).
There are two things you can do.
1. You can set the camera so that it wont reset the counter to zero. Settings menu 1. Card/Folder/File Menu > File Name > Auto. It will start numbering where it left off.
2. Name you file in your computer and/or make a new folder for every photoshoot.
@@ForsgardPeter Ok thanks, will try that!!
I am waiting, waiting,…
Sorry to hear. I hope you get yours soon!
I don't have this camera (OM-1) nor any E-M1s. I think it is more logical to include human being in the Subject tracking AF menu. I also wish OMDS could develop more subjects (e.g. bee & butterfly) tracking which should appeal to many people (rather than train and airplane).
I heard that people have had great success using the bird tracking on bees and butterflies but I don’t own the om1 so I can’t give you any first hand experience.
@@Nathan-we8rz Thanks for the info. I saw a bird photographer (in youtube) using his Canon R5 to track a dragonfly in flight. I hope somebody can demonstrate the same with the OM-1.
When not a single gear reviewer .. even takes a pic of any Aircraft .....nevermind a train for that matter . I wish they would take images of high altitude aircraft when they review .. long reach lenses ..
But that will sadly never happen
@@colintraveller why would you want a high altitude picture of an aircraft? Most people, like me for example, like to take pictures of military jets flying at lower altitudes for image quality and being able to see all the weaponry hanging off the bottom of the aircraft and the markings of the aircraft.
@@highwayman1224 You should know the answer before it was even asked ... If you regard yourself as an Aviation fanatic / Tog ..
For the simple fact ... there is always something to CAPTURE .. IE Various Civillian Jet's/ Helo's ,,and Military .. IE C5 , C17 , RAF P8 Which i have captured flying overheard .
A user-friendly menu is my top priority...if functions are buried in the menu, capturing images becomes a chore.
The OM system is awesome. Unfortunately they discontinued one of the best lenses they hat, the 300 f/4
No they did not. It is still in their line-up. Where did you get that impression?
I thought the Olympus OM-1 was an old 70's film camera.
It is, this name for this OM SYSTEM OM-1 comes from that.
I’m stuck without my OM-1, it developed a fault, sis auto flashing red on lcd then the camera just shutdown. I have returned it for repair. It is now stuck in a warehouse waiting to be shipped to Portugal to be repaired. No idea how long it will take to get there, this is the response I got “Also, we would like to inform you, that the final implementation of Brexit in the UK, is leading to an extreme and unexpected situation, that we are working with our partners,
but unfortunately, we are not able to impose any action from UK Government and Customs Processes/Guidelines.
All imports into UK and export from the UK face severe delays due to the volumes at Customs from and into the UK.
Independently of the provider being used, unfortunately, the outcome is the same.
We are in close contact with the brokers working with our providers and trying to understand from the UK side if any action can be taken to expedite the solution.
Unfortunately, we have to ask for your patience and understanding towards an issue we cannot control from our side.
In the meantime, we have registered your serial number internally, so when it arrives at our repair center, we will inform you and prioritize its repair. “
Did you send it to OMDS or your dealer? It is usually faster if you send through OMDS service rather than through a dealer. Unfortunately,, the UK left the EU, which means custom clearance for goods between UK and the EU. Not much OMDS can do. I hope you get your camera back soon repaired.
@@ForsgardPeter I returned it to OMDS Peter, I understand it is out of there control. I still have my E-M1 Mkiii as my backup, luckily I did not sell it as planned. I’m missing the Bird detection though, now the Swifts, Swallows and Martins are back, it’s much harder to get good shots. A chance to improve my technique I suppose! Thanks for the reply and keep up the good work.
A typical cost-cutting measure, much to the consumer's chagrin. Service is being cut back and made worse. Just a few years ago, the camera manufacturers' representatives all had their own workshops in many countries. Nowadays, the defective camera is sent halfway around the world to a low-wage country for repair. Welcome to the neoliberalism of profit maximisation.
Here goes a subscribe for you, Pete. Thanks for the content! Got my OM-1 together with the 40-150 f.4 Pro today and hope it will finally be the camera to satisfy my needs for both photo and video. Looking forward to more content from you!
Thanks! Welcome onboard!
there is something wrong with this camera, and is that there is not stock on any place in Americas! i want the om-1 with 300mm f4, but i feel like an eternity to wait, i went to a camera store, and they almost convinced me to take a sony a7IV with the 200-600 G, is a cheaper combo! xD i will wait a little bit more tho just a little bit~
They must have a good price for Sony.
@T JB this was not on sale, the seller offer me instead Om-1 plus 300mm f4 cost 6450 CAD, the sony A7IV plus 200-600mm 5800 CAD plus a discount for that lens, i am waiting for the om-1 cuz i have some lenses m43, but my patient start to runs out xD i follow a guy that just changed his Z9 for the A1 seams better in AF
For stills: (1) Autofocus! (2) Weight! for me.
Hi Peter. I'm really enjoying the OM1. Overall it's a better Camera than the em1iii, but there are things I prefer on the old Camera. The front and rear control wheels were MUCH better and better positioned. The OM1 display has already lost the “click” when closed and opens by itself in the backpack, which can be a risk. The improvement in image quality is there, but I would have liked to have seen a better low light capability, because it's a BSI sensor and because they kept the 20mp. The battery cover seems to be of lower quality plastic (not a big problem), but over time I've had the impression that the em1iii is more robust and with a better quality feeling in the material. But that's it. Otherwise, I'm really curious if we'll have big FW Updates with improvements for both Cameras. The em1iii NEEDS to receive a major FW Update, and the OM1 has many aspects that could be improved, especially in the AF performance.
The lack of display "click" is something I did not notice, but you have a point.
@@ForsgardPeter It's not the lack of the “click” (or safety lock) because the lock is there. But it just stopped to work properly as the plastic deteriorated in 1 month of use. It is really not a big deal, but the display opens by itself in the Bag… On the em1iii the display stays absolutely closed and there is no risk of opening while walking. I believe it is just a small defect in my Camera.
@@ForsgardPeter Does your OM1 display close with a click and stay locked?
Yes it does. I see or feel no difference between E-M1 Mark III and OM-1.
@@ForsgardPeter I found the source of the problem: the protective film I put on to protect the display is too thick. It has nothing to do with the quality of the plastic used. My mistake!
Probably some people here will hate me for pointing this out, but it is a completely new sensor and still lagging behind aps-c cameras released 8 YEARS AGO in terms of noise performance. it's not right. 20 mpix is totally fine and AF issues will get fixed in firmware updates. Most likely.
I beg to disagree. I have the EM1X, and the Nikon D500, and after all is said and done,it is very hard to tell the photos apart. If you go to my YT channel,I just uploaded a day at the lake where I used 4 different cameras, FF, APSC, and m4/3s and can you tell which is which? Cheers!
@@ridealongwithrandy Digital noise is a measurable factor and no personal preference, bias or belief can change that. This is not about pandering one brand over another, just plain facts. 8 year old Nikon D500 that you mentioned offer cleaner images than brand new OM-1. Does it matter in every situation? No. Are your pictures very nice? Yes. :) . Good luck.
Blame Sony! Sony is the fabricator of the sensor. If you use Photo Lab 5 Elite, noise isn’t a problem. That’s tru even for E-M 1 mark II and E-M 1x.
@@hemligx-sson8202 Some may say that they want to have pictures, not CGI.
I was ready to pull the trigger on an OM-1 with two lenses and had the items in my shopping basket at OM System's own online shopping site. But I have decided not to go ahead with the order. The reason is I did contact customer support with a question regarding the current promotion. This was three days ago and I still haven't heard a word back. And this is pre-sales we're talking about. If this is customer communication pre-sales how will it be post sales? Just not good enough. There is absolutely no way to contact them other than through a link on their website, but no answers.
That is a pity. The communication should be better.
👌👍👍🙏
👋🙋