I saw recently where there is a school system in New Jersey where some parents are protesting that the students are being taught the basics of Islam. They should understand that there is a difference between being taught about an ideology, as compared to being indoctrinated into that ideology. So schools should teach the basics of the world's various religions. A supplemental course might be to analyze the problems and benefits these ideologies place on the various cultures of the world.
@@mysterio22 I would suggest the word, "theology" over ideology. "Ideology" carries a normative judgment in contemporary culture. I teach religious studies/theology in a Catholic school. We have a World Religions class that is accepted by the University of California as a social science elective. However, when I teach a class in Catholic theology, it is looked upon as too partisan, or "ideological", for similar acceptance as a college prep, "A-G" requirement. My experience of approximately thirty years of teaching this course is that students are very open to it.
@Jack Hamilton have you read all of the Quran meaning and Tafsir? Have you read all the hadiths? Because you said things in your comment that are forbidden in Islam. You should respect this religion and I respect yours if you have one and if you don’t then whatever mate.
I think it is pretty weird, how people let their enraged emotions get in the way of gaining more knowledge and understanding foreign things. I am an Atheist for example, but i find this topic interesting and i'd like to understand it better (without wanting to join), but everyone is just bashing everything instead of having an intelligent discussion :
Paleoconservatives are more likely brainwashed by their churches and the fables they spread by mouth, like the 'faked moon landing' and 9/11 conspiracies. A lot of the hate I'm seeing on here looks like it comes straight off the pulpit of the reactionary Church of Christ.
+abcz98 The teachings of Muhammad and Islam are varied and contradictory, the Qu'ran even says this explicitly. To treat it like a single ideology would be simple minded. If you're an atheist you should be able to look at the Bible and Qu'ran through an impartial lens. If people didn't believe in them literally they'd be held in the same esteem as Dante's Inferno and Homer's epics. You're lucky enough to have the opportunity to appreciate them in that way.
hbk711x Ähm... on a seperate matter from your argument, but your profile picture is incorrect. The Nazi symbol is a right turning swastika, not a left turning one :?
"Sociologist and anthropologist, study religion that'll put food on the table and help communities grow." Seriously, are you Pol Pot? You're really, seriously... here... saying that education and knowledge is useless if... it doesn't put food... on the table. WOW. WOW. Just go ahead and delete your account.
5:26 Quick correction! Yes, muslims do believe in the resurrection of Prophet Isa i.e. Jesus. But, he wont return to the world as a prophet, rather he would return as a follower of Muhammad before the day of Qiyamah or the dooms day to bring the people to the right path again.
@@flm786 but I have a doubt...I apologise if I m wrong....but Jesus was before Mohammed as Jesus belongs to 1st century and Mohammed belongs to 7th century....how could Jesus come on the doomsday and wiping of all the sinners....if prophet comes after Jesus, prophet could have wiped out all sinners...or prophet can come again instead of Jesus on doomsday?
beautifully presented... some people think...Islam was born in 7th century..due to Muhammad(PBUH) ....but people don't understand we muslim believe in Jesus ,Moses and Abrahams (PBUT) who came to Earth to preach the words of The God(Allah) long before did Mohammad(PBUH) too...People who do this nonsenical comments please do your research without listening to your mainstream media....💞
Brother we are in 21st century how can you believe Mohammed can be messenger of God(Allah)? He was a warrior greedy for money, power, and sex addiction man. Common this guy so wicked man. God wouldn't send a criminal man to his people.
@@meximosteklu3797, So fighting for your survival makes you a warrior? You would also be a warrior if you were born in a nation which was being attacked by external powers. Or would you rather run away? Leaders in the old days married the daughters of chiefs and kings in order to make treaties and alliances with other nations. This doesn't make them sex addicts. Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) was born in a rich family. But after His Prophethood, he went into dire poverty. And when he died, he didn't even have money to buy oil for his lamps. His Wife mortgaged one of his swords, to get some oil. Read the correct history before you resort to allegations. If you want to study someone's history, would you rather study it from the books written by someone who claims to be his/her hater?
As a born Muslim, I literally started to learn my religion from the basic. And everytime I learn something new, my love to Islam grew. I became much calmer, happier, and more present now. May Allah ease your journey of learning this beautiful religion and be a Muslim soon.. ameen🌹
Sad that people are so closed minded they can so adamantly reject education. Regardless of your beliefs, Islam had a important role in the intellectual development of our species, if you want to understand the evolution of thought you need to have some knowledge of Islam.
+Mikesfavorite Golden age of Islam was a light in a very dark age for thought and reason. Philosophers like Avicenna and Averroes influenced post-Enlightenment European philosophers. Al-Khwarizmi played a pivotal role in the development of Algebra.
+Ravi Achan There have been Muslims throughout history who have been beneficial to mankind as far as scholarly contributions. The religion of Islam did not contribute to that. In more recent times Islam has worked as a negative to the accumulated knowledge of mankind by mandating a denial of scientific research and findings. The denial of the Theory of Evolution is an example. To a lesser degree Christianity has the same shortcoming. For a religion to actually contribute to human enlightenment, intellectual advances have to be found in the texts of the various religions.
@Mikesfavorite I agree with you except that I think a religion can promote what you refer to as scholarly contributions by the religion imploring followers to explore all fields of science without restrictions. I'll have to think if there is a religion that qualifies. None that I can think of right off.
+Mikesfavorite I'd argue that the scholarly tradition of Islam is what encouraged the intellectuals I mentioned, and that they wouldn't have existed without Islam. Though I absolutely agree that in the last centuries it's been detrimental to intellectual development in the regions that follow it.
He is not muslim , Person with such a knowledge would not be believe in god or santa claus ... He is the type of person who like to explore not like religious shit's who close their knowledge door in a single book
I'd just like to add some clarification: 1. Makkah is only viewed as a symbolic "house of god". Just as any other mosque in any other place is viewed as a "house of god". Muslims do not believe that God literally resides in these places. 2. Presence of two witnesses is not a necessary condition for a person converting to Islaam. Islaam is a covenant between a man and God, intervention of a mediator in this relationship isn't necessary at all. 3. "There is not god but god" isn't a good translation of the testimony of faith. It is better translated as "There is no deity worthy of worship except Allaah".
Great Introductory video!! Just one more thing: Muslims believe that the Torah, Psalms and Gospels were revealed as words from God but over the course of many many years there have been many changes/additions/subtractions in those texts. So we don't know what to consider an actual word of God and what not. On the other hand the Quran, we believe, is 100% word of God with no human intervention. That's why we don't follow the other books.
Well, if you compare Surah 3:146 in the Hafs and Albazzi versions, for example, you will find that they say different things, and it's not just "dialect". They actually contrast. Presumably one was original and the other is not.
@@bowrudder899 Can you provide proof to support your claim that the versions "actually contrast" and "not just dialect"? Did you even bother checking with any credible Islamic source, or was it easier to parrot some dishonest anti-Islam websites with an obvious biased narrative? Anyways, here are a couple of videos: 1- Was the Quran Ever Changed? - Dr. Shabir Ally th-cam.com/video/kSfpFia2RQc/w-d-xo.html It took five seconds to find. 2- Different qirat - Yasir Qadhi (different readings/recitations) th-cam.com/video/LDSBOMK2M2g/w-d-xo.html It took me 30 minutes to find, because I first needed to read and learn about this subject which is not commonly known to the average Muslim. I must say, thank you for bringing up this subject. Learning about the different citations gave me more reason to appreciate the linguistic novelty of the Qur'an.
@@hitman55001, You ask for proof that different Arabic Qurans actually contrast, they aren't just versions of the same thing. That is easy to show if you can get your hands on an Albazzi Quran and compare the translation of Surah 3:146 in the Albazzi with the Hafs Quran. The two differ. They do not say the same thing: In one the Hafs it says that "many a prophet fought", whereas in the Albazzi it says "many a prophet was killed". Obviously there is a difference between merely fighting and being killed; in the one case you have supper that night, in the other you don't. That is just one example. There are many more. It's open to independent verification; just get your hands on the Albazzi Quran and see for yourself.
@@bowrudder899 Thanks for your response. I looked into that verse and many others, in different Qur'anic versions. This case can definitely be confusing to anyone who does't read Arabic or is not familiar with the linguistic and cultural evolution in the Arabian area. The following is a long response, but I hope it answers any questions. There are a few errors in your analysis. 1) The supposed two different words used in the Hafs and Albazzi versions are قَاتَلَ (qaa-tala) and قُتِلَ (qu-tila). In today's standardized traditional Arabic, these two words are understood as 'fought' and 'was killed' respectively. However, both words come from the root word قَتَلَ (qatala). The word 'qatala' means 'fought', 'killed', or BOTH. This means, that even in today's standardized Arabic, both words قَاتَلَ (qaa-tala) and قُتِلَ (qu-tila) are interchangeable and can be understood in either or both ways. They are synonyms, not contrasts. And you'll usually find them alongside each other in any Arabic dictionary I took the time and investigated all the other "different" words in the different Qur'anic versions that I managed to find online, the same logic applies to all of them. No conflict in meaning was found. 2) The evolution of language and culture. It's illogical to apply the language standard of today to how the language was communicated fourteen centuries ago. Both 'qaa-tala' and 'qu-tila' may have two different uses and can be considered two different words today, but that's only because we're using today's standardized Arabic which was put together and accepted by a relatively modern official entity to make the language more user friendly. Remember, in the past, each tribe had its own dialect. Some of which were so unique and bazaar sounding to the common Arabic speaker today. Yet, all of their dialects and speech manners were equally legitimate and understood by the community then. Here are a couple of examples: Example A: Arabic from ancient times ليس من البر الصيام في السفر lai-sa me'nal bir-ri as-siyamu fil-safar ليس من امبر امصيام في امسفر lai-sam mimam bir-rim siya-mum fem-safar Both sentences literally translate "It's not of good deed to fast (worship) while traveling". They both mean the exact same thing. Notice both writings and pronunciations are strikingly different. A common Arabic speaker today wouldn't even be able to read or understand the second dialect. Yet, these two vastly different dialects were equally understood and considered equally Arabic to the common Arabian of the past. Example B: Arabic from modern day The Arabic word for 'cat' in modern day can be: قطة 'qit-tah' in one dialect بسينه 'bsai-neh' in another dialect Again, notice how differently written and pronounced each word is. Yet, these two different words have the exact same meaning (cat). 3) Different languages are not equal. It's illogical and unjust to translate an Arabic word that means and describes two things at the same time ('qatala') into two different words in another language (English 'fought' and 'killed') then claim they are two different words in Arabic. Besides, even if you apply modern Arabic language standard and argue that 'qaa-tala' and 'qu-tila' are two different words, the meaning behind those two words is still exactly the same. --- In conclusion, in the different versions of the Qur'an, some words surely differ in pronunciation and writing (by today's language standard), but the meaning and the message behind them is consistent and do not contrast or conflict. In that sense, there are no changes in the Qur'an.
The date being mentioned was the date the most popular hadith books was written, but the hadith was collected and written while Prophet Mohammed (SAW) was alive.
The Quran is now understood to have been evolving after Mohammad’s death. There are no complete Qurans inspite of the fact that Mohammad had scribes to document the supposed words of allah. And inspite of the fact that Abu Bakr after Mohammadks death destroyed all variant copies and introduced his standard. The oldest copies of the Qurans in museums today do not resemble the Qurans today. So do not believe the saying that the Qurans are preserved because they are uniform and identical. Islam is an amalgam of various religions of Mohammad’s day as he attempted to appeal to everyone to gain a following.
thanks for the videos but i think you should post more videos about islamiyat , like , four khalifa , typs of hadith in short Islamiyat cambridge Topics plz.
Simple and straight path seems to be: One and only One Creator/sustainer of the universe. He makes His business to provide guidance and values for mankind to live by. A guidance free of superstition, which provides a way to implement social welfare, equality [degree of status for humans should be based on piety and good behavior], justice, compassion, tolerance and accountability both in this and the world hereafter. It is easy to believe that guidance for mankind was provided by choosing Messengers from humans who received Revelation and passed it on by having it documented and by exemplary behavior. Instead of us defining what God Almighty is, let Him tell us.
No, he didn't. You're thinking of the Spread of Islam videos from a few weeks ago. I didn't see you claiming there was an agenda when he posted the videos on Christianity or Judaism or Zoroastrianism. Shouldn't you guys be fleeing in terror at the mere mention of an academic institution?
Well . There is too many reasons . But the most important one is because they are colonizing a sacred place for muslims which is : The mosque" Al Aqsa" in palestine . We believe that Mohammed peace be upon him had been there in :al israa and miraaj incident (im not excellent in english you can read about it to understand me i couldn t explain it) adding to the fact that in the begins of the final message islam , muslims were praying in the direction of al aqsa , not to mecca in Saudi Arabia. Then the order of god came so that it changes , also , muslims and especially some arab muslims are angry from j@@ ews because "eventhough they have arabic blood" a lot of them stood in the side of colonialism and betrayed their communities . The problem is more complicated than it seems . And thats is all what i had . Thx
Abrahams direct son from Sarah was Isaac. Ishmael was given to Abraham by Hagar, Sarahs maidservant. Plus in Genesis Abraham worshipped Yahweh. I dont see Allah in the 1st 5 books of the Bible.
There's a mosque in #KERALA_INDIA which is built during messanger of Islam come to INDIA ... Kerala's Hindu king built a mosque for them worshipping ..... That mosque is one of the oldest mosque in the world ... And one of them built during muhhamed's time...
Well according to this Wikipedia page it looks like that this mosque might have been built at the the time of Prophet but not by him. And just to be sure, I am talking about Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)
He is actually mistaken Bassam. The story is after Prophet Muhammad (SAW) split the Moon, a Hindu King all the way from India in the land of Kerala had witnessed the Moon split that day and heard a few merchants saying there was a Prophet in Arabia who had split the Moon. So he travelled to Arabia and met the Prophet and converted to Islam. He came back to Kerala and built the Oldest Mosque that is in India today.
You call this high level overview? Most of the stuff your saying aren't even correct from a high level view lol. You clearly don't understand how hadith are compiled or work.
There is no violence in Quran. Fighting verses in Quran are historical against a specific group as the Quraysh Meccans and Byzantine Romans as with 9:29 revealed on the battlefield since they waged war against the Muslims first and persecuted them kicking them out of their homes from Mecca. These fighting verses were revealed on battlefield for Muslims to fight in Self-Defense.
It's confusing to me, especially when my family has seen reams of papers and roll after roll of videotape from the ones who killed our loved ones talking about the "will of God being to kill Americans in their homeland." And all sorts of other statements that sound to me like the people in question were stark-raving crazy but they obviously believed what they were saying. Even w/out knowing Arabic you could listen to the sound of their voices (and the conviction in it) that THEY believed themSELVES. And people even called bin Laden "the Sheikh" which seems like a title of respect to me, further confusing me. Of course right after it happened an Imam said "bin Laden and his friends have gone crazy and forgotten Islam." I've never forgotten it bc it was so unusual to hear it and besides, I've never heard it from anyone else since the day I read it.
Hadith is pronounced as "Hadis", just so you know, we respect Muhammad. Incest is a sin. Having more than one wife is NOT a sin - and this polygamic relationship must have an APPROVAL by his wife. We believe that our bodies are created from god, so to alter these bodies in any way is a sin - that is why we cannot be transexual. But the thing is, not every muslim is as religious as the last, some of them become "Murtads", people who act like a muslim but does not respect the CORRECT morals and rules that it's been trying to make light to. We have an iron clad rule. That is to respect other religions.
hbk711x if you don't get proper consent, then the wife has full rights to get a divorce and compensation from the husbands (when they first get married -money is given to the newly weds- so during a divorce, you have to pay that amount)
hbk711x just like the times, the people have changed as well, muslims can voice out their rights now, so if you don't get proper approval but you still get married - the man is then judged as "Murtad", but since Islam isn't that strict in most countries and it's not like there are people who keep tabs on you 24/7 and judge you as "Murtad" right away - these people could get away with it. It's complicated
I still don't see any proof man needs a wife's persmission at all. what if he is traveling? doesn't make sense, times change but the religion is preserved. All that is required is the man be just as stated in surah 4 from what I have seen.
I saw recently where there is a school system in New Jersey where some parents are protesting that the students are being taught the basics of Islam. They should understand that there is a difference between being taught about an ideology, as compared to being indoctrinated into that ideology. So schools should teach the basics of the world's various religions. A supplemental course might be to analyze the problems and benefits these ideologies place on the various cultures of the world.
knowledge about geopolitics is also important since it will draw a connection between various incidents and their socio-economic circumstance.
I agree, I personally would like to know more about other religions. Even though I used to be a Muslim.
World can use more tim's. A canadian be like more tim hortons yes.
@@mysterio22 I would suggest the word, "theology" over ideology. "Ideology" carries a normative judgment in contemporary culture. I teach religious studies/theology in a Catholic school. We have a World Religions class that is accepted by the University of California as a social science elective. However, when I teach a class in Catholic theology, it is looked upon as too partisan, or "ideological", for similar acceptance as a college prep, "A-G" requirement. My experience of approximately thirty years of teaching this course is that students are very open to it.
@Jack Hamilton have you read all of the Quran meaning and Tafsir? Have you read all the hadiths? Because you said things in your comment that are forbidden in Islam. You should respect this religion and I respect yours if you have one and if you don’t then whatever mate.
I think it is pretty weird, how people let their enraged emotions get in the way of gaining more knowledge and understanding foreign things. I am an Atheist for example, but i find this topic interesting and i'd like to understand it better (without wanting to join), but everyone is just bashing everything instead of having an intelligent discussion :
RefiaPhenix. People are Brainwashed by media
Paleoconservatives are more likely brainwashed by their churches and the fables they spread by mouth, like the 'faked moon landing' and 9/11 conspiracies. A lot of the hate I'm seeing on here looks like it comes straight off the pulpit of the reactionary Church of Christ.
+abcz98 The teachings of Muhammad and Islam are varied and contradictory, the Qu'ran even says this explicitly. To treat it like a single ideology would be simple minded. If you're an atheist you should be able to look at the Bible and Qu'ran through an impartial lens. If people didn't believe in them literally they'd be held in the same esteem as Dante's Inferno and Homer's epics. You're lucky enough to have the opportunity to appreciate them in that way.
hbk711x Ähm... on a seperate matter from your argument, but your profile picture is incorrect. The Nazi symbol is a right turning swastika, not a left turning one :?
"Sociologist and anthropologist, study religion that'll put food on the table and help communities grow." Seriously, are you Pol Pot? You're really, seriously... here... saying that education and knowledge is useless if... it doesn't put food... on the table. WOW. WOW. Just go ahead and delete your account.
5:26 Quick correction! Yes, muslims do believe in the resurrection of Prophet Isa i.e. Jesus. But, he wont return to the world as a prophet, rather he would return as a follower of Muhammad before the day of Qiyamah or the dooms day to bring the people to the right path again.
H never died according to our religion Islam, he was raised to heaven by Allah and will return,
@@flm786 but I have a doubt...I apologise if I m wrong....but Jesus was before Mohammed as Jesus belongs to 1st century and Mohammed belongs to 7th century....how could Jesus come on the doomsday and wiping of all the sinners....if prophet comes after Jesus, prophet could have wiped out all sinners...or prophet can come again instead of Jesus on doomsday?
@@saikiraraju.m.r wdym?I can't understand Ur question
@black human Don't compare prophets they are brothers in Islam
beautifully presented... some people think...Islam was born in 7th century..due to Muhammad(PBUH) ....but people don't understand we muslim believe in Jesus ,Moses and Abrahams (PBUT) who came to Earth to preach the words of The God(Allah) long before did Mohammad(PBUH) too...People who do this nonsenical comments please do your research without listening to your mainstream media....💞
Brother we are in 21st century how can you believe Mohammed can be messenger of God(Allah)? He was a warrior greedy for money, power, and sex addiction man. Common this guy so wicked man. God wouldn't send a criminal man to his people.
@@meximosteklu3797
Who are you to compare your 21st century morality to that of the past?
@@meximosteklu3797 you moron......
@@meximosteklu3797, So fighting for your survival makes you a warrior? You would also be a warrior if you were born in a nation which was being attacked by external powers. Or would you rather run away? Leaders in the old days married the daughters of chiefs and kings in order to make treaties and alliances with other nations. This doesn't make them sex addicts. Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) was born in a rich family. But after His Prophethood, he went into dire poverty. And when he died, he didn't even have money to buy oil for his lamps. His Wife mortgaged one of his swords, to get some oil. Read the correct history before you resort to allegations. If you want to study someone's history, would you rather study it from the books written by someone who claims to be his/her hater?
we need more religion videos that goes beyond the limit know we learn in school .
The more I learn about islam the more I feel like I want to convert to it
It goes in line with a natural inclination and a sound intellect. Please learn more in baby steps.
As a born Muslim, I literally started to learn my religion from the basic. And everytime I learn something new, my love to Islam grew.
I became much calmer, happier, and more present now. May Allah ease your journey of learning this beautiful religion and be a Muslim soon.. ameen🌹
Brother who is stopping you then? Life is for once do what you want. we Muslims are here to help you to understand more and more about it.
You stupid or something?
Could you please make a playlist of this topic? Your videos are all scattered and I'd love to watch them in order. Please and thanks.
You can watch it in orderat khan academy app
Sad that people are so closed minded they can so adamantly reject education. Regardless of your beliefs, Islam had a important role in the intellectual development of our species, if you want to understand the evolution of thought you need to have some knowledge of Islam.
I'm not sure how Islam had "an important role in the intellectual development of the species".
+Mikesfavorite
Golden age of Islam was a light in a very dark age for thought and reason. Philosophers like Avicenna and Averroes influenced post-Enlightenment European philosophers. Al-Khwarizmi played a pivotal role in the development of Algebra.
+Ravi Achan There have been Muslims throughout history who have been beneficial to mankind as far as scholarly contributions. The religion of Islam did not contribute to that. In more recent times Islam has worked as a negative to the accumulated knowledge of mankind by mandating a denial of scientific research and findings. The denial of the Theory of Evolution is an example. To a lesser degree Christianity has the same shortcoming. For a religion to actually contribute to human enlightenment, intellectual advances have to be found in the texts of the various religions.
@Mikesfavorite I agree with you except that I think a religion can promote what you refer to as scholarly contributions by the religion imploring followers to explore all fields of science without restrictions. I'll have to think if there is a religion that qualifies. None that I can think of right off.
+Mikesfavorite
I'd argue that the scholarly tradition of Islam is what encouraged the intellectuals I mentioned, and that they wouldn't have existed without Islam. Though I absolutely agree that in the last centuries it's been detrimental to intellectual development in the regions that follow it.
reupload with minor correction
Khan Academy Are you a Muslim?
Sal is actually an atheist.
He is not muslim , Person with such a knowledge would not be believe in god or santa claus ... He is the type of person who like to explore not like religious shit's who close their knowledge door in a single book
dhanish Person with such knowledge would not believe in god?
mataozil where is your proof
i'm happy that you described islam as it is....
It’s amazing I wish everyone can understand that!
Ramadan is not just about eating or drinking
He forgot about killing infidels
@@hewhobringsthenight9907 Killing infidels is unislamic and Haram.
thank you for removing misconceptions
I'd just like to add some clarification:
1. Makkah is only viewed as a symbolic "house of god". Just as any other mosque in any other place is viewed as a "house of god". Muslims do not believe that God literally resides in these places.
2. Presence of two witnesses is not a necessary condition for a person converting to Islaam. Islaam is a covenant between a man and God, intervention of a mediator in this relationship isn't necessary at all.
3. "There is not god but god" isn't a good translation of the testimony of faith. It is better translated as "There is no deity worthy of worship except Allaah".
Great Introductory video!!
Just one more thing:
Muslims believe that the Torah, Psalms and Gospels were revealed as words from God but over the course of many many years there have been many changes/additions/subtractions in those texts. So we don't know what to consider an actual word of God and what not. On the other hand the Quran, we believe, is 100% word of God with no human intervention.
That's why we don't follow the other books.
What about all the changes to the Quran?
Well, if you compare Surah 3:146 in the Hafs and Albazzi versions, for example, you will find that they say different things, and it's not just "dialect". They actually contrast. Presumably one was original and the other is not.
@@bowrudder899 Can you provide proof to support your claim that the versions "actually contrast" and "not just dialect"?
Did you even bother checking with any credible Islamic source, or was it easier to parrot some dishonest anti-Islam websites with an obvious biased narrative?
Anyways, here are a couple of videos:
1- Was the Quran Ever Changed? - Dr. Shabir Ally
th-cam.com/video/kSfpFia2RQc/w-d-xo.html
It took five seconds to find.
2- Different qirat - Yasir Qadhi (different readings/recitations)
th-cam.com/video/LDSBOMK2M2g/w-d-xo.html
It took me 30 minutes to find, because I first needed to read and learn about this subject which is not commonly known to the average Muslim.
I must say, thank you for bringing up this subject. Learning about the different citations gave me more reason to appreciate the linguistic novelty of the Qur'an.
@@hitman55001, You ask for proof that different Arabic Qurans actually contrast, they aren't just versions of the same thing. That is easy to show if you can get your hands on an Albazzi Quran and compare the translation of Surah 3:146 in the Albazzi with the Hafs Quran. The two differ. They do not say the same thing: In one the Hafs it says that "many a prophet fought", whereas in the Albazzi it says "many a prophet was killed". Obviously there is a difference between merely fighting and being killed; in the one case you have supper that night, in the other you don't. That is just one example. There are many more. It's open to independent verification; just get your hands on the Albazzi Quran and see for yourself.
@@bowrudder899 Thanks for your response. I looked into that verse and many others, in different Qur'anic versions.
This case can definitely be confusing to anyone who does't read Arabic or is not familiar with the linguistic and cultural evolution in the Arabian area. The following is a long response, but I hope it answers any questions.
There are a few errors in your analysis.
1)
The supposed two different words used in the Hafs and Albazzi versions are قَاتَلَ (qaa-tala) and قُتِلَ (qu-tila). In today's standardized traditional Arabic, these two words are understood as 'fought' and 'was killed' respectively.
However, both words come from the root word قَتَلَ (qatala). The word 'qatala' means 'fought', 'killed', or BOTH.
This means, that even in today's standardized Arabic, both words قَاتَلَ (qaa-tala) and قُتِلَ (qu-tila) are interchangeable and can be understood in either or both ways. They are synonyms, not contrasts. And you'll usually find them alongside each other in any Arabic dictionary
I took the time and investigated all the other "different" words in the different Qur'anic versions that I managed to find online, the same logic applies to all of them. No conflict in meaning was found.
2)
The evolution of language and culture.
It's illogical to apply the language standard of today to how the language was communicated fourteen centuries ago.
Both 'qaa-tala' and 'qu-tila' may have two different uses and can be considered two different words today, but that's only because we're using today's standardized Arabic which was put together and accepted by a relatively modern official entity to make the language more user friendly.
Remember, in the past, each tribe had its own dialect. Some of which were so unique and bazaar sounding to the common Arabic speaker today. Yet, all of their dialects and speech manners were equally legitimate and understood by the community then. Here are a couple of examples:
Example A: Arabic from ancient times
ليس من البر الصيام في السفر
lai-sa me'nal bir-ri as-siyamu fil-safar
ليس من امبر امصيام في امسفر
lai-sam mimam bir-rim siya-mum fem-safar
Both sentences literally translate "It's not of good deed to fast (worship) while traveling". They both mean the exact same thing.
Notice both writings and pronunciations are strikingly different. A common Arabic speaker today wouldn't even be able to read or understand the second dialect. Yet, these two vastly different dialects were equally understood and considered equally Arabic to the common Arabian of the past.
Example B: Arabic from modern day
The Arabic word for 'cat' in modern day can be:
قطة 'qit-tah' in one dialect
بسينه 'bsai-neh' in another dialect
Again, notice how differently written and pronounced each word is. Yet, these two different words have the exact same meaning (cat).
3)
Different languages are not equal.
It's illogical and unjust to translate an Arabic word that means and describes two things at the same time ('qatala') into two different words in another language (English 'fought' and 'killed') then claim they are two different words in Arabic.
Besides, even if you apply modern Arabic language standard and argue that 'qaa-tala' and 'qu-tila' are two different words, the meaning behind those two words is still exactly the same.
---
In conclusion, in the different versions of the Qur'an, some words surely differ in pronunciation and writing (by today's language standard), but the meaning and the message behind them is consistent and do not contrast or conflict. In that sense, there are no changes in the Qur'an.
Hadith was not written "hundreds" of years after Muhammad (SAW). Just a slight problem I had
It was written 200 years after his death
The date being mentioned was the date the most popular hadith books was written, but the hadith was collected and written while Prophet Mohammed (SAW) was alive.
The Quran is now understood to have been evolving after Mohammad’s death. There are no complete Qurans inspite of the fact that Mohammad had scribes to document the supposed words of allah. And inspite of the fact that Abu Bakr after Mohammadks death destroyed all variant copies and introduced his standard. The oldest copies of the Qurans in museums today do not resemble the Qurans today. So do not believe the saying that the Qurans are preserved because they are uniform and identical. Islam is an amalgam of various religions of Mohammad’s day as he attempted to appeal to everyone to gain a following.
@@rleon8183 abu bakr was the first one that tried to gathered the quran into one book sice the verses were writien in leafs and rock and on trees
Hadith was in heart of his companion and most pious Muslim.then it was transferred from heart to book.
so happy you made this video..
Thank you so much for this.
Very knowledgeable video. Nice work Khan Academy.
this comment thread is gonna be worse than the last one.
okay
this was really helpful, thank you.
great video! very educational
Allah Akbar
Fantastic video, well explained.
Thank you
Excellent
Thank you so much for this video...keep going
thanks for the videos but i think you should post more videos about islamiyat , like , four khalifa , typs of hadith in short Islamiyat cambridge Topics plz.
Nice effort sal Sir😘
Simple and straight path seems to be: One and only One Creator/sustainer of the universe. He makes His business to provide guidance and values for mankind to live by. A guidance free of superstition, which provides a way to implement social welfare, equality [degree of status for humans should be based on piety and good behavior], justice, compassion, tolerance and accountability both in this and the world hereafter. It is easy to believe that guidance for mankind was provided by choosing Messengers from humans who received Revelation and passed it on by having it documented and by exemplary behavior. Instead of us defining what God Almighty is, let Him tell us.
the swallowing was getting on my nerves so much lol
Iam A muslim
Me roo
the 86 dislikers got a small loan of a million dollars from trump! gonna give them an offer they cant refuse!
I made a short video to simplify basic principles of Islam as an Arab Muslim
Well this is interesting, doing religion lessons too eh.
Awesome.
It's sooooo interesting!
This is an educational video, your feelings don't matter
6:10 The translation was wrong
*There is no god worthy of worship except Allah
Actually la elah ella Allah literally mean no god but God (Allah) , in arabic لا اله يستحق العبادة الا الله is different, it is just an interpretation
Isn't this the third time you've uploaded this same video?
What's the agenda?
No, he didn't. You're thinking of the Spread of Islam videos from a few weeks ago. I didn't see you claiming there was an agenda when he posted the videos on Christianity or Judaism or Zoroastrianism. Shouldn't you guys be fleeing in terror at the mere mention of an academic institution?
I don't think there's an "agenda." Actually I was thinking he got complaints and had to reupload for clarity.
@ he already said that it's re-upload bcz there were mistakes in last video
impressive
I will never understand why there is no love lost between Muslims and Hebrews at large, given the common roots and common core belief.
Hebrew is a language
I guess you meant jews
Well . There is too many reasons . But the most important one is because they are colonizing a sacred place for muslims which is : The mosque" Al Aqsa" in palestine . We believe that Mohammed peace be upon him had been there in :al israa and miraaj incident (im not excellent in english you can read about it to understand me i couldn t explain it) adding to the fact that in the begins of the final message islam , muslims were praying in the direction of al aqsa , not to mecca in Saudi Arabia. Then the order of god came so that it changes , also , muslims and especially some arab muslims are angry from j@@ ews because "eventhough they have arabic blood" a lot of them stood in the side of colonialism and betrayed their communities . The problem is more complicated than it seems . And thats is all what i had . Thx
Muslims: want to convert? Say these words!
Christians: *knocking on your door
Jews: *snip snip*
Abrahams direct son from Sarah was Isaac. Ishmael was given to Abraham by Hagar, Sarahs maidservant. Plus in Genesis Abraham worshipped Yahweh. I dont see Allah in the 1st 5 books of the Bible.
This is just sad that you're this ignorant. Not even worth an explanation.
There's a mosque in #KERALA_INDIA which is built during messanger of Islam come to INDIA ...
Kerala's Hindu king built a mosque for them worshipping .....
That mosque is one of the oldest mosque in the world ...
And one of them built during muhhamed's time...
ujjwal ruhela no offense but as a Muslim I haven't heard or read anywhere that the prophet ever visited to India
Bassam Siraj
But it's true....
You can visit it any time or read about it on Google
Bassam Siraj
www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheraman_Juma_Mosque&ved=0ahUKEwiIpMW-pYfaAhUHto8KHTJpCdIQFggyMAI&usg=AOvVaw2MAvTiITUastOSMs9y9DGe
Well according to this Wikipedia page it looks like that this mosque might have been built at the the time of Prophet but not by him. And just to be sure, I am talking about Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)
He is actually mistaken Bassam. The story is after Prophet Muhammad (SAW) split the Moon, a Hindu King all the way from India in the land of Kerala had witnessed the Moon split that day and heard a few merchants saying there was a Prophet in Arabia who had split the Moon. So he travelled to Arabia and met the Prophet and converted to Islam. He came back to Kerala and built the Oldest Mosque that is in India today.
What video editing software is used in this video?
Muslims know what is "Soul"!
Please say S.A.W and alaihissalam with Prophets
Great an interesting regardless of belief. Thanks!
Good stuff 👏
hello
cool
Islam is cool
You call this high level overview? Most of the stuff your saying aren't even correct from a high level view lol. You clearly don't understand how hadith are compiled or work.
When you're showing a timeline for all other religions, how come you missed Hindu?
He did videos on Hinduism
@@sazidafnan5015 Don't want your opinion i asking the publisher when he shows a timeline and included Jesus, why he didn't include hindu?
@@Joyultrapromax well jesus is a part of islam . Thats why he showed jesus
Фπ - PUBG Pro Players because I think its a timeline of abrahmaic faiths.
Hinduism has nothing to do with Abrahamic religions.
I don't see any profound philosophy coming from Islam. Just arbitrary rules and provocation of violence throughout the Quran.
There is no violence in Quran. Fighting verses in Quran are historical against a specific group as the Quraysh Meccans and Byzantine Romans as with 9:29 revealed on the battlefield since they waged war against the Muslims first and persecuted them kicking them out of their homes from Mecca. These fighting verses were revealed on battlefield for Muslims to fight in Self-Defense.
I won't get into an argument but I'll just leave this video here: th-cam.com/video/bkVsus8Ehxs/w-d-xo.html
Devansh Rathore tipical lying. Talk but nonsense
sir may I know ur name
Religion islam gameover
Is Sal Khan muslim ?
God is all pervading! 4:03 Is the Kaaba an Idol?
Kaba is a direction to pray. This is for the unity of the society
It's confusing to me, especially when my family has seen reams of papers and roll after roll of videotape from the ones who killed our loved ones talking about the "will of God being to kill Americans in their homeland." And all sorts of other statements that sound to me like the people in question were stark-raving crazy but they obviously believed what they were saying. Even w/out knowing Arabic you could listen to the sound of their voices (and the conviction in it) that THEY believed themSELVES.
And people even called bin Laden "the Sheikh" which seems like a title of respect to me, further confusing me.
Of course right after it happened an Imam said "bin Laden and his friends have gone crazy and forgotten Islam."
I've never forgotten it bc it was so unusual to hear it and besides, I've never heard it from anyone else since the day I read it.
Islam doesn't support any unnecessary violence, Islam highly respects people of other religions and never allows to force someone to accept Islam.
you're the one who killed iraqis are you dumb or something? how u gonna act like the victim
Hadith is pronounced as "Hadis", just so you know, we respect Muhammad. Incest is a sin. Having more than one wife is NOT a sin - and this polygamic relationship must have an APPROVAL by his wife. We believe that our bodies are created from god, so to alter these bodies in any way is a sin - that is why we cannot be transexual.
But the thing is, not every muslim is as religious as the last, some of them become "Murtads", people who act like a muslim but does not respect the CORRECT morals and rules that it's been trying to make light to.
We have an iron clad rule. That is to respect other religions.
hbk711x if you don't get proper consent, then the wife has full rights to get a divorce and compensation from the husbands (when they first get married -money is given to the newly weds- so during a divorce, you have to pay that amount)
hbk711x just like the times, the people have changed as well, muslims can voice out their rights now, so if you don't get proper approval but you still get married - the man is then judged as "Murtad", but since Islam isn't that strict in most countries and it's not like there are people who keep tabs on you 24/7 and judge you as "Murtad" right away - these people could get away with it.
It's complicated
I still don't see any proof man needs a wife's persmission at all. what if he is traveling? doesn't make sense, times change but the religion is preserved. All that is required is the man be just as stated in surah 4 from what I have seen.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Bro? Yes he does..
world's most peaceful relegion .. islam 😂😂😂
what is that wrong??
keep crying fool
I proud of Islam i love islam
Terrorism 101
keep crying fool Truth will always remain on Top
this is boring