Haha thank you for taking the time to watch and drop a compliment! Lots more content like this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check what I’ve got in the works. Also do me a factor and share word of the channel with your buddies!
The flow of your videos are getting so good dude. You are by far my favorite gun guy on TH-cam. I hope nothing but greater success for you. Thank you for all the knowledge you share with us.
Thank you! Really appreciate the compliments and the support! I’m making a legitimate effort to grow this channel so you should start seeing lots of new content through year end…. My hope is that every video gets better than the last one and provides the viewer some kind of valuable takeaway. Hope you’ll stay tuned and don’t forget to share my channel with your buddies!
Awesome review on the Impact 4000. You are very clear and concise in your explanations of the equipment you are using and how you are using it. I’m sold! Looks like a real game changer for long range rifle shooting. You have the most incredibly beautiful “range” and scenery to exercise the 2nd amendment. Keep that content coming!
Great review! I wanted to note that holding .8 mils under your target is not correct unless you are at 100 yards. The offset will always be 3 inches, but .8 mils is not always 3 inches offset. Holding slightly low (3 inches) is not a bad thing to insure that you're ranging the correct target and not over the top, but that mechanical offset doesn't change with distance like the mil does. 10:40
just so everyone is aware, the zero point of the rangefinder is set Independently from the reticule of the scope. As stated in the video, they are not meant to converge (also meaning they are not meant to diverge). Utilizing it in the method portrayed in the video will result in inaccurate readings. This is worth adding a disclaimer in the video as the consequences could be rather drastic. For example, in the video he states that a proper zero from the reticule is .8 Mils at 100 yards, Which would equate to roughly 2.88 inches *(at 100 yards). Assuming the Height Over Bore (Rather the line of sight through the center of the scope -A.K.A crosshairs) is 2.88 Inches below the Line of sight of the IR/visible Laser that fires to take the range reading this is the proper setup and will always accurately return a reading of 100 Yards when he uses the .8 Mil mark in the scope. BUT ONLY AT 100 YARDS. At distance continuing to use the .8 mil mark in the scope will return an incorrect reading as you would ultimately be ranging in front of the target you are trying to hit. Basically Mil and MOA are both angular measurements and you can think of them as "expanding" at distance. We've established that .8 mils At 100 yards is 2.88 inches, but at 200 yards .8mils is 5.76 inches, At 500 yards .8mils is 14.4 inches, and at 1000 yards .8 mills is 28.8 inches, ETC... As the line of sight of the scope is independent of the Vis/IR laser for the rangefinder (meaning they do not converge or diverge, rather they remain in parallel), the original distance measurement would still apply, not the angular measurement taken via the reticule. The Rangefinder will always return a reading from 2.88 Inches above the centerline (crosshairs) of your scope. The correct way to range these targets at distance would be to put them in the crosshairs (as long as your scope is still zeroed at the original 100 yard mark) and take a range, rather then continue to use the .8 Mil mark as he does in the video. This worked well for him in the video, and will probably work well in most target applications as they typically have some sort of immediate backdrop to catch rouge bullets. But where this can be dicey is for anyone utilizing this tool in a hunting application, as often times deer do not have an immediate backdrop and have a significant amount of "negative space" between the portion you are trying to hit and the ground. in theory, you could ultimately range under the deer's body, and actually return a range 100 yards (or more/less) behind it from a hill, tree, or other animal resulting in a missed shot or worse, a wounded deer. All this to say, great video showcasing this piece of exciting new tech to an industry that has been rather underserved by our modern capability's in electronics and computing. Glad to see you showing it to your audience and I will be subscribing to see more videos from you in the future! (Edited for understanding)
5 หลายเดือนก่อน
One thing he adjusted his turet, did he not say that you should only use holdover
@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 if you copy the methodology in the video for set-up, just use your crosshairs to range the target PRIOR to adjusting the turrets. If you need to range again, return the scope to the original zero setting put your crosshairs on the target and take a range, then readjust the turrets to the output of the RF. The rangefinder will always return a distance measurement 2.88 inches above the center dot of your crosshair (given its set to the original hundred yard zero) regardless of how far away what your ranging is. (A laser does not follow a parabolic flight path, rather is a straight line from A-B) if your scope already has adjustment dialed in to the turret your ranging significantly higher/lower from your point of aim. Let me know if this helps.
@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 in other words, just make sure the line of sight through the scope and the visible laser are as parallel as possible. You don't want them to converge or diverge, because the vortex laser will depart from the scope reticle and measure some other distance (than what is in the scope crosshairs).
I think you may have misunderstood how the divergence of the laser from your line of sight works. If your line of sight and the laser are both a straight line and they are 3 inches apart on the gun and 3 inches apart at 100 yards then they are also 3" apart at every other distance. So at 500 yards you'd only need to aim about .2 mills under your intended ranging target to have your laser centered on the target. At 1,000 yards it would be within .1 mils of your center cross hair etc... This is why Vortex recommends to zero it this way. The farther away you range the closer the laser is to your center cross hair. This is a simple case of mixing up a fixed offset with a fixed angular subtension. In the video you were likely picking up the ground at the bottom of the 1,000 yard target and most other targets with the laser so it still gives an accurate range and holdover. Anyways, great shooting.
Man, it's hard to find videos on TH-cam that give great reviews. You're an exception! Great video. Complete, to the point, and easy to follow. I agree. As an owner of an unlocked RAPTAR, the Impact 4000 brings something to the market that most people were not aware of (or could not afford). I have since moved to the Impact 4000 as it offers me more in a better, lifetime-warranty package. First time subscriber here!
Excellent explanation of the practical use of this device. Thank you for the effort that you put into these videos, and thank you for being upfront and honest about free gear/ammo when provided.
Appreciate you taking the time to watch! I’m having a blast creating content for the channel and really enjoy all the support I’ve received lately. Part of growth is working with companies on various products… certainly I want to capitalize on these opportunities but I want the viewer to have a fair understanding of everything when using my content to make a decision. Lots of new content in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out!
Really cool to hear you enjoyed the video and my content inspired you to get into long range! Long range shooting is epic but be warned it gets addicting and expensive haha
Ha that’s always my debate… do I wait to hear the sound come back before running the bolt or do I try to get on the bolt fast before the sound comes back?? Gotta make sure the viewers can hear the dings!
For someone whose only long range experience is using a Primary Arms ACSS reticle scope, this was so very informative to me. Thank you for the information and for keeping it at an elementary level that I was able to understand. Keep it up!👍🏼
That is a goal that I’m working toward. Lots of new content in the works between now and year end so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out and don’t forget to share my content with your buddies! Thanks for watching
Well done! My personal impression is that this is the most complete and informative presentation of this thing that I have seen so far. Although... You looked a little bit weird as you flipped and spun the Impact 🤣
I appreciate how thorough you are on all your videos, I have the Impact 4000 on my MRAD in 300 NM, I have not had a chance to get out with it yet, but you answered some questions I had. Thank you
Best video That I have seen on the range finder. I will be using this for long-range precision shooting for a big bore airgun known as the Airforce Texan LSS .50 with custom-made bullets looking to break the next big airgun shot in long range. Im looking forward to receiving it in the mail. Thank you for going into detail again. This is the best video on this range finder.
Awesome review! Think it’s already been said but the reason for zeroing the laser .8 mils above the reticle at 100yds is so it maintains a consistent zero 3 inches above POA and that distance stays the same at all distances, only being .8mils at 100yds
Really awesome to hear your enjoying the content and finding value in watching! I’ve got a lot of new content coming so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out and don’t forget to share with your buddies!
Great stuff man. Really appreciate the attention to detail you bring into these videos. I can see that segment about return to zero being a very useful bit of information for serious buyers.
I got their fury binoculars with applied ballistics so i can use it with multiple rifles without buying new mounts or setting it up every time i use a different rifle. If you have one dedicated lr rifle though being able to range right off your rifle is the way to go. Ill wait for holosun to come out with their version half price and half the size lol
Relative to other options (if they're even there), the Impact 4000 is indeed bangin' for the $1,999 price tag for what it does. Also, thanks for the quality education and content. It's really helping me warm-up on my journey to longrange shooting for when I get there.
Love, your videos !!’ You keep making and I’ll keep watching. Could the difference in how much you tightened the vortex have caused the non return to zero?
You know that’s a great point and something I didn’t even think about. Yes it’s very possible inconsistent torque is what lead to the poi shift. Might have to grab a torque wrench and try the poi shift test again sometime.
Excellent video as usual great information on an item I’m interested in. Viewer made a good point on the offset 3” offset will be about .1 mill (I think) at 1000yds, but you were spot on about using your 100 yard zero to range. Good job, hope to see more from you soon.😊
Great video. On the subject on the gear review type video: Fantastic pacing. Didn’t go full reading a spec sheet and explained what bullets you were working with. Easily digestible shooting footage and my respect went up when you stated your misses. If I was in the market for a range finder, this video would have sold me on one. The vortex nation podcast gets douchey and Texas hunters podcast gets kinda rambling. Looking forward to future content.
Great job giving us an overview of the Vortex Impact 4000! For adjusting Windage, I believe the device can accept data inputs from a Kestrel via Bluetooth.
This is true but you need the app to transfer data from kestrel. Flow is like this Kestrel->App->Impact. Once data is on the Impact it will be retained and you can close the app until the next time you want to update it. I usually just read wind from the kestrel and manually input that wind on the Impact
I appreciate the approach you took to explain how you synced the range finder with mount to the optic. I also appreciate your transparency towards the end of the video where you include some of your misses. Just subbed, great work, look forward to the next vid.👍
Really cool to hear you enjoyed watching this one! Also I appreciate the sub, lots more content just like this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned. On the topic of the misses… that’s part of the game. We’re not all sub moa all day shooters and none of us have 100% hit percentages so just out here trying to create content that gives viewers a look at reality for the average shooter.
Been playing with one for the last couple weeks. Had it out to 1300 so far. Used my kestrel data to build profiles. Onboard ballistics were spot on out to about 1100. Started to see some variances between AB and Geo past 1100. My intended purpose is team match and honestly will likely only use ranging with armboard and not ballistics. My 52 year old eyes have a little issue with the display in the ballistics mode. HCD display much better for me. They could probably offer some font options in firmware. Yes it’s big but sub $2k versus the alternatives will be a winner.
Well done sir. Enjoyed the video and the content about the 4000. I’m still waiting for some of the pitfalls to show up before I actually buy one, but I’m sure interested in it. Keep up the good work sir.
Funny how well your Content matches my needs I have a open box I just received Impact 4000 I could not pair my remote control but seems like you didn’t use one or the App thank you so much for your time sharing your experience much Respect Bill W.
If the light on the remote is blinking orange, which is easy to mistake as red in sunlight, you need to press and hold up/down on the remote to make it discoverable by other devices. It will blink red when it is discoverable. The remote can be added by the Impact directly if you don't want to use the app
I’m not 100% on the .8 hold under. Makes sense using that to zero the laser, but it would be a converging angle too… like zeroing to the reticle. At 200 yards, .8 is going to be 6 inches, at 300 it’ll be 9 inches etc. so technically that 3 inch offset will get closer to zero. But it’s always going to be 3 inches… if that makes sense? Regardless of that, rad video 🔥
Yes, you are correct there. Several other commenters mentioned this early on so I adjusted how I was using the laser when series and it’s been working spot on since then. Instead of .8 under at distance I just use the center of the crosshairs
Man, I love this channel, but I'm sooo jealous of the land you have to shoot in. I'm lucky if I can get out to 300 yards in Western Wa. Keep up the good work, I've learned a lot from you.
I’ve got the 300nm barrel and actually launched a video earlier this year showing how it performed… check out the link below if you’re interested. Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel! 300 Norma Mag in action….. The military’s new sniper round! th-cam.com/video/6KnQCh4HcCU/w-d-xo.html
The Vortex Impact 4000 is one more step toward a rifle scope that includes ranging, BDC, windage allowance, and automatic reticle adjustment to target. It may even eventually include an optional AI target identification and automatic trigger actuation when all parameters align. Just send out your Tesla Optimus robot to bring in the venison, cleaned, wrapped, and cooked to perfection.
1- you're pretty good. 2- that thing's impressive. Those first shot impacts are very nice. 3- probably not too far away from an AI scope that 'moves' the reticle for you. This is halfway there it seems.
I dig it. Definitely on my wishlist. I just have a hard time justifying this over a set of good range finding binos that aren’t slaved to a specific rifle.
I live in a place where the tree line goes to the top of mountains. If I can find a place where i can see 1000yards straight, I cant see the splash. Very jealous of your landscape!
A non bias comparison between their system and Sig's BDX would be interesting. I find that Vortex's system makes it big and clunky in the field. More likely to bump it on something.
I personally believe it is worth the $2k price tag if you can shoot long-range. I unfortunately don't have anywhere easily accessible to shoot long range. It looks like a lot of fun, and I would like to be able to try it sometime
2K is very good price for that. I am using kestrel paired with sig RF and it is sick for spotter-shooter work. But handheld finders are quite hard to use and have a lot of learning curve. Being able to range precisely and have a stable position helps the rangefinder also. The wind in northern europe is rarely coming from a certain angle, the terrain and wind conditions usually create difficulties getting a good estimate for first round hits, compared to rare winter and summer days when the wind actually is predictable /steady. How did you like the ergonomics of using that thing that high up the rifle? Did you try it in gear? Because it seems like a bit cumbersome to operate with stuff on. Even kestrel is not easy to use in winter time with its screen lagging from the cold.
So I just wanted to point out that your logic of holding .8 mills under the target is flawed. A mill is an angular unit of measurement, so at 100 yards .8 mils will be 3 inches but at 2000 yards .8 mills will be 60 inches which means you ranging an object 57 inches below your target. in the example of ranging the antelope, you were actually measuring the distance to the ground in front of the antelope. Essentially, after you zero, the rangefinder to your optic, you will simply put your crosshairs on the object you are ranging and probably the 3 inches doesn’t matter. If it does then just hold 3 inches low. Otherwise, I really enjoyed the video.
Love the content. Very impressive for what looks like a one man show. One question on the laser zero, won’t the .8mil hold for ranging change as distance increases? 3 inches measured in Mils will change dramatically from 100yd to 1,000.
Great question and you would be right if you don’t get the zero process correct. What I’m showing in the video is a parallel zero. The laser sits 3” above the center of my scope and at 100yds 3” equates to .8 mils. So if I’m able to zero the laser perfectly at .8mils above my crosshair then I have a perfect parallel zero on the laser. Say you zero the laser to your crosshair at 100yds vs the .8 high…. That’s when you would have major error as you get to distance because your laser is set to converge with your crosshair at such a close distance. Hopefully I was able to explain that clearly, let me know if that didn’t make sense haha
@@MountainsMulletsMerica Also had a question along these lines because I was confused about the .8 mil hold for ranging. If the laser has a parallel zero with a 3" offset, wouldn't you just hold center reticle at sufficiently long ranges? For example, a 3" offset at 1000 yards would be 0.08 mils (3"/36"), which is effectively the center of the reticle. Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here.
Im curious what its limits are and what the beam divergence is. Im also interested to see a follow up video 5 or 6 months down the road to see what your thoughts are after time behind it.
Quality video on this awesome device. However your ranging method of holding .8 MIL is incorrect. While zeroing and confirming at 100y is fine. The zero of the WMLRF is NOT angular. It is always just 3” high (or however high it is over centerline of optic), it’s not relatable in MILS outside of your zero distance.
Thanks for another great video and showing us what looks to be a great tool. I'd love to hear your thoughts on how well the app works with the unit in practical use.
@MountainsMulletsMerica I would be interested to hear your take on this also. Generally, I like to use without the app because it is a standalone device. The app does have some added functionality and is easier to read and navigate compared to the device. Some notable functions specific to the app are: Using multi B.C bullets from the library, MV temp tables, sharing profiles and range cards via text/email, storing more than 10 profiles, pulling weather from airports or 3rd party devices, using Impact to drop pins on a map, exclude/include things like spin drift, aero jump and Coriolis in the ballistic calculation (app must be selected as the ballistic source for when connected to the Impact).
For zeroing, why not just adjust so the laser and line of site are parallel? A 3" vertical offset between the laser and the line of sight isn't going to do anything to the ballistic calculation
Guys out here casually dropping the best long distance videos on TH-cam
Haha thank you for taking the time to watch and drop a compliment! Lots more content like this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check what I’ve got in the works. Also do me a factor and share word of the channel with your buddies!
His vids are solid for sure. Have you seen Rex's sniper 101 vids?
Right! Very methodical, step by step easy to understand.
He sure is
😂
The flow of your videos are getting so good dude. You are by far my favorite gun guy on TH-cam. I hope nothing but greater success for you. Thank you for all the knowledge you share with us.
Thank you! Really appreciate the compliments and the support! I’m making a legitimate effort to grow this channel so you should start seeing lots of new content through year end…. My hope is that every video gets better than the last one and provides the viewer some kind of valuable takeaway. Hope you’ll stay tuned and don’t forget to share my channel with your buddies!
Awesome review on the Impact 4000. You are very clear and concise in your explanations of the equipment you are using and how you are using it. I’m sold! Looks like a real game changer for long range rifle shooting. You have the most incredibly beautiful “range” and scenery to exercise the 2nd amendment. Keep that content coming!
I can't get over that view
Great review!
I wanted to note that holding .8 mils under your target is not correct unless you are at 100 yards.
The offset will always be 3 inches, but .8 mils is not always 3 inches offset.
Holding slightly low (3 inches) is not a bad thing to insure that you're ranging the correct target and not over the top, but that mechanical offset doesn't change with distance like the mil does. 10:40
just so everyone is aware, the zero point of the rangefinder is set Independently from the reticule of the scope. As stated in the video, they are not meant to converge (also meaning they are not meant to diverge). Utilizing it in the method portrayed in the video will result in inaccurate readings. This is worth adding a disclaimer in the video as the consequences could be rather drastic.
For example, in the video he states that a proper zero from the reticule is .8 Mils at 100 yards, Which would equate to roughly 2.88 inches *(at 100 yards). Assuming the Height Over Bore (Rather the line of sight through the center of the scope -A.K.A crosshairs) is 2.88 Inches below the Line of sight of the IR/visible Laser that fires to take the range reading this is the proper setup and will always accurately return a reading of 100 Yards when he uses the .8 Mil mark in the scope. BUT ONLY AT 100 YARDS.
At distance continuing to use the .8 mil mark in the scope will return an incorrect reading as you would ultimately be ranging in front of the target you are trying to hit. Basically Mil and MOA are both angular measurements and you can think of them as "expanding" at distance. We've established that .8 mils At 100 yards is 2.88 inches, but at 200 yards .8mils is 5.76 inches, At 500 yards .8mils is 14.4 inches, and at 1000 yards .8 mills is 28.8 inches, ETC...
As the line of sight of the scope is independent of the Vis/IR laser for the rangefinder (meaning they do not converge or diverge, rather they remain in parallel), the original distance measurement would still apply, not the angular measurement taken via the reticule. The Rangefinder will always return a reading from 2.88 Inches above the centerline (crosshairs) of your scope. The correct way to range these targets at distance would be to put them in the crosshairs (as long as your scope is still zeroed at the original 100 yard mark) and take a range, rather then continue to use the .8 Mil mark as he does in the video.
This worked well for him in the video, and will probably work well in most target applications as they typically have some sort of immediate backdrop to catch rouge bullets. But where this can be dicey is for anyone utilizing this tool in a hunting application, as often times deer do not have an immediate backdrop and have a significant amount of "negative space" between the portion you are trying to hit and the ground. in theory, you could ultimately range under the deer's body, and actually return a range 100 yards (or more/less) behind it from a hill, tree, or other animal resulting in a missed shot or worse, a wounded deer.
All this to say, great video showcasing this piece of exciting new tech to an industry that has been rather underserved by our modern capability's in electronics and computing. Glad to see you showing it to your audience and I will be subscribing to see more videos from you in the future!
(Edited for understanding)
One thing he adjusted his turet, did he not say that you should only use holdover
Yes he did.@
Can you put this in a really simple terms? or are you a lawyer.
@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 if you copy the methodology in the video for set-up, just use your crosshairs to range the target PRIOR to adjusting the turrets.
If you need to range again, return the scope to the original zero setting put your crosshairs on the target and take a range, then readjust the turrets to the output of the RF.
The rangefinder will always return a distance measurement 2.88 inches above the center dot of your crosshair (given its set to the original hundred yard zero) regardless of how far away what your ranging is. (A laser does not follow a parabolic flight path, rather is a straight line from A-B) if your scope already has adjustment dialed in to the turret your ranging significantly higher/lower from your point of aim.
Let me know if this helps.
@@deadmenwalkingsavtheusa7594 in other words, just make sure the line of sight through the scope and the visible laser are as parallel as possible. You don't want them to converge or diverge, because the vortex laser will depart from the scope reticle and measure some other distance (than what is in the scope crosshairs).
I think you may have misunderstood how the divergence of the laser from your line of sight works. If your line of sight and the laser are both a straight line and they are 3 inches apart on the gun and 3 inches apart at 100 yards then they are also 3" apart at every other distance. So at 500 yards you'd only need to aim about .2 mills under your intended ranging target to have your laser centered on the target. At 1,000 yards it would be within .1 mils of your center cross hair etc... This is why Vortex recommends to zero it this way. The farther away you range the closer the laser is to your center cross hair.
This is a simple case of mixing up a fixed offset with a fixed angular subtension.
In the video you were likely picking up the ground at the bottom of the 1,000 yard target and most other targets with the laser so it still gives an accurate range and holdover.
Anyways, great shooting.
I could watch this channel ALL DAY
Awesome to hear you’re enjoying the content! I’ve got a lot of new videos in the works so hope you’ll stick around to check them out!
Wtf like the most epic background in the world
Man, it's hard to find videos on TH-cam that give great reviews. You're an exception! Great video. Complete, to the point, and easy to follow.
I agree. As an owner of an unlocked RAPTAR, the Impact 4000 brings something to the market that most people were not aware of (or could not afford). I have since moved to the Impact 4000 as it offers me more in a better, lifetime-warranty package.
First time subscriber here!
Iv been waiting for the people I follow to put out content on this an here you are 3 months ago educating. Thank you very much 👍
Stay tuned for my next video drop! Lots of fresh content impact 4000 footage headed your way!
Excellent explanation of the practical use of this device. Thank you for the effort that you put into these videos, and thank you for being upfront and honest about free gear/ammo when provided.
Appreciate you taking the time to watch! I’m having a blast creating content for the channel and really enjoy all the support I’ve received lately. Part of growth is working with companies on various products… certainly I want to capitalize on these opportunities but I want the viewer to have a fair understanding of everything when using my content to make a decision. Lots of new content in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out!
Yes, it will; excellent video, as always!
This is what I’ve been searching for thank you! This channel inspired me to go head first into long range!
Really cool to hear you enjoyed the video and my content inspired you to get into long range! Long range shooting is epic but be warned it gets addicting and expensive haha
@@MountainsMulletsMerica lol I went full on with my first bolt, picked up an mrad and an atacr 7-35 looking at trying this 4000 out aswell
When we can hear the plink in the distance on each shot before you run the bolt it's confidence inspiring
Ha that’s always my debate… do I wait to hear the sound come back before running the bolt or do I try to get on the bolt fast before the sound comes back?? Gotta make sure the viewers can hear the dings!
This is the direct benefit we see from a company like vortex getting a gov contract for the NGSW optic. Trickle down of awesome tech.
For someone whose only long range experience is using a Primary Arms ACSS reticle scope, this was so very informative to me. Thank you for the information and for keeping it at an elementary level that I was able to understand. Keep it up!👍🏼
Favorite channel hands down!
We need to get this guy to 50k subs by the end of the year.
That is a goal that I’m working toward. Lots of new content in the works between now and year end so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out and don’t forget to share my content with your buddies! Thanks for watching
Well done! My personal impression is that this is the most complete and informative presentation of this thing that I have seen so far. Although... You looked a little bit weird as you flipped and spun the Impact 🤣
I appreciate how thorough you are on all your videos, I have the Impact 4000 on my MRAD in 300 NM, I have not had a chance to get out with it yet, but you answered some questions I had. Thank you
Love your content, I agree the impact is awesome. Alot of them were on guns at major lands sniper cup, the winners had them.
That is some beautiful scenery in the background, great video! Had been considering this and your video was a huge help.
Great review! Thanks for all the details.
Best video
That I have seen on the range finder. I will be using this for long-range precision shooting for a big bore airgun known as the Airforce Texan LSS .50 with custom-made bullets looking to break the next big airgun shot in long range. Im looking forward to receiving it in the mail. Thank you for going into detail again. This is the best video on this range finder.
Great review and demo of this awesome tool. Thank you for educating me and all your viewers. Merica!
RLTW!
Absolutely love watching these videos! Nothing beats watching long range and cleaning the hunting rifles!
Man it’s awesome to hear you’re enjoying the content! Thanks for the support!
As usual, concise, informative commentary.
Awesome review! Think it’s already been said but the reason for zeroing the laser .8 mils above the reticle at 100yds is so it maintains a consistent zero 3 inches above POA and that distance stays the same at all distances, only being .8mils at 100yds
By far the best instructional video on this device that I’ve seen.
Really cool to hear you enjoyed watching this one!
That scenery is something for sure.
my go to channel for precision rifle gear review and content
Really awesome to hear your enjoying the content and finding value in watching! I’ve got a lot of new content coming so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out and don’t forget to share with your buddies!
Great video, appreciate your content ad usual!!
Bro is literally reading my mind and reviewing the gear I want reviewed
Love it! Glad to hear you enjoyed this one!
Would love to see you review the Burris Eliminator 5 LaserScope, for those of us that just need a solution for a single long range rifle. 😬
Best review I've seen. Vortex should pay you for your complete Instruction in the real world
I like your style of reviews/ info videos
Thank you! Really awesome to hear you’re enjoying my content! Lots of new videos in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check them out.
You're on fire!! If it had IR like the Wilcox Raptar, it'll be a home run. But I know that would just make it more expensive.
I have no mountains, I have no mullet but I have plenty of ‘Merica! 🌲🇺🇸🌲
Great stuff man. Really appreciate the attention to detail you bring into these videos. I can see that segment about return to zero being a very useful bit of information for serious buyers.
Yeah that Vortex Warranty for a piece of kit like this is unbeatable. Plus it looks mean as hell.
I got their fury binoculars with applied ballistics so i can use it with multiple rifles without buying new mounts or setting it up every time i use a different rifle. If you have one dedicated lr rifle though being able to range right off your rifle is the way to go.
Ill wait for holosun to come out with their version half price and half the size lol
You make shooting long range look so easy! Love the content!
Dude, great review.... I've watched your summary multiple times trying to decide if it should go on my MRAD .338......
Oh man that’s an easy question….. yes haha
@@MountainsMulletsMerica OK, that's kind of what I thought. Where are you filming your videos? Montana?
@@StuPierce77I’ve filmed in several places, this one specifically was in eastern Wyoming. Most of the other videos are eastern WA state
Relative to other options (if they're even there), the Impact 4000 is indeed bangin' for the $1,999 price tag for what it does.
Also, thanks for the quality education and content. It's really helping me warm-up on my journey to longrange shooting for when I get there.
Love, your videos !!’ You keep making and I’ll keep watching. Could the difference in how much you tightened the vortex have caused the non return to zero?
You know that’s a great point and something I didn’t even think about. Yes it’s very possible inconsistent torque is what lead to the poi shift. Might have to grab a torque wrench and try the poi shift test again sometime.
Excellent video as usual great information on an item I’m interested in. Viewer made a good point on the offset 3” offset will be about .1 mill (I think) at 1000yds, but you were spot on about using your 100 yard zero to range. Good job, hope to see more from you soon.😊
King review!
Thank you! Really awesome to hear you found value in watching!
Props for the MRAD making another appearance! Always cool to see it stretched out.
One of my favorite long range rifles! Always fun to find an excuse to get it to the range!
Great video.
On the subject on the gear review type video:
Fantastic pacing. Didn’t go full reading a spec sheet and explained what bullets you were working with. Easily digestible shooting footage and my respect went up when you stated your misses.
If I was in the market for a range finder, this video would have sold me on one.
The vortex nation podcast gets douchey and Texas hunters podcast gets kinda rambling.
Looking forward to future content.
Great job giving us an overview of the Vortex Impact 4000!
For adjusting Windage, I believe the device can accept data inputs from a Kestrel via Bluetooth.
This is true but you need the app to transfer data from kestrel. Flow is like this Kestrel->App->Impact. Once data is on the Impact it will be retained and you can close the app until the next time you want to update it. I usually just read wind from the kestrel and manually input that wind on the Impact
I appreciate the approach you took to explain how you synced the range finder with mount to the optic. I also appreciate your transparency towards the end of the video where you include some of your misses. Just subbed, great work, look forward to the next vid.👍
Really cool to hear you enjoyed watching this one! Also I appreciate the sub, lots more content just like this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned. On the topic of the misses… that’s part of the game. We’re not all sub moa all day shooters and none of us have 100% hit percentages so just out here trying to create content that gives viewers a look at reality for the average shooter.
Thanks for the good review.
I would love to see more verifications of ballistic solutions between 600 and 1400 yards on non-reflectivd targets.
Been playing with one for the last couple weeks. Had it out to 1300 so far. Used my kestrel data to build profiles. Onboard ballistics were spot on out to about 1100. Started to see some variances between AB and Geo past 1100. My intended purpose is team match and honestly will likely only use ranging with armboard and not ballistics. My 52 year old eyes have a little issue with the display in the ballistics mode. HCD display much better for me. They could probably offer some font options in firmware. Yes it’s big but sub $2k versus the alternatives will be a winner.
Fine I'll start watching all your suff..... you got me
Haha love it! Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel. Lots of fresh content in the works!
Just freakin awesome review!!
Well done sir. Enjoyed the video and the content about the 4000. I’m still waiting for some of the pitfalls to show up before I actually buy one, but I’m sure interested in it. Keep up the good work sir.
Funny how well your Content matches my needs I have a open box I just received Impact 4000 I could not pair my remote control but seems like you didn’t use one or the App thank you so much for your time sharing your experience much Respect Bill W.
If the light on the remote is blinking orange, which is easy to mistake as red in sunlight, you need to press and hold up/down on the remote to make it discoverable by other devices. It will blink red when it is discoverable. The remote can be added by the Impact directly if you don't want to use the app
I’m not 100% on the .8 hold under. Makes sense using that to zero the laser, but it would be a converging angle too… like zeroing to the reticle.
At 200 yards, .8 is going to be 6 inches, at 300 it’ll be 9 inches etc.
so technically that 3 inch offset will get closer to zero. But it’s always going to be 3 inches… if that makes sense?
Regardless of that, rad video 🔥
Yes, you are correct there. Several other commenters mentioned this early on so I adjusted how I was using the laser when series and it’s been working spot on since then. Instead of .8 under at distance I just use the center of the crosshairs
Man, I love this channel, but I'm sooo jealous of the land you have to shoot in. I'm lucky if I can get out to 300 yards in Western Wa. Keep up the good work, I've learned a lot from you.
Hey you did great job shooting and making the video! Thanks
Great shooting as usual. Id like to see you shoot some 300/338 norma with the mrad. I hope you got those calibers with the MRAD kit
I’ve got the 300nm barrel and actually launched a video earlier this year showing how it performed… check out the link below if you’re interested. Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel!
300 Norma Mag in action….. The military’s new sniper round!
th-cam.com/video/6KnQCh4HcCU/w-d-xo.html
Fantastic review. Great Shooting. I highly value your opinion.
The Vortex Impact 4000 is one more step toward a rifle scope that includes ranging, BDC, windage allowance, and automatic reticle adjustment to target. It may even eventually include an optional AI target identification and automatic trigger actuation when all parameters align. Just send out your Tesla Optimus robot to bring in the venison, cleaned, wrapped, and cooked to perfection.
Great video!
Thank you! Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel!
Great video. Thanks for all of the information.
Glad you enjoyed this one! Lots more content just line this in the works so hope you’ll stay tuned to check it out!
1- you're pretty good.
2- that thing's impressive. Those first shot impacts are very nice.
3- probably not too far away from an AI scope that 'moves' the reticle for you. This is halfway there it seems.
I dig it. Definitely on my wishlist. I just have a hard time justifying this over a set of good range finding binos that aren’t slaved to a specific rifle.
I live in a place where the tree line goes to the top of mountains. If I can find a place where i can see 1000yards straight, I cant see the splash. Very jealous of your landscape!
.8 mile at 100y is 3”-ish, but .8 at further distances is not. Angular measurements are going to increase at further distances.
A non bias comparison between their system and Sig's BDX would be interesting. I find that Vortex's system makes it big and clunky in the field. More likely to bump it on something.
As per normal great information thank you!
I've got mien in order. Great video as usually
Really good stuff man!
I personally believe it is worth the $2k price tag if you can shoot long-range. I unfortunately don't have anywhere easily accessible to shoot long range. It looks like a lot of fun, and I would like to be able to try it sometime
We've had an MRAD in our shop and wasn't too impressed. Now here I am looking them up again debating it 😂
Excellent job!
great video dude!
Just ordered mine today with Spuhr mounts for three rifles.
You really put me on the spot at the end...I don't have the money for one...haha
Great review... love this channel.
Appreciate you taking the time to watch and support the channel! Help me out and share with your buddies when you can.
Thank you for this. Great video. You got a new subscriber. I will be buying this.
great video brother.
Appreciate it! I had a blast putting this one together.
Ok we set up super simple.
Me: following along.🤤
2K is very good price for that.
I am using kestrel paired with sig RF and it is sick for spotter-shooter work.
But handheld finders are quite hard to use and have a lot of learning curve.
Being able to range precisely and have a stable position helps the rangefinder also.
The wind in northern europe is rarely coming from a certain angle, the terrain and wind conditions usually create difficulties getting a good estimate for first round hits, compared to rare winter and summer days when the wind actually is predictable /steady.
How did you like the ergonomics of using that thing that high up the rifle? Did you try it in gear? Because it seems like a bit cumbersome to operate with stuff on. Even kestrel is not easy to use in winter time with its screen lagging from the cold.
Love the video!
I would think it's a solid piece of kit. I hope it turns out that way.
Thanks for the information, brother
Appreciate you taking the time to watch!
So I just wanted to point out that your logic of holding .8 mills under the target is flawed. A mill is an angular unit of measurement, so at 100 yards .8 mils will be 3 inches but at 2000 yards .8 mills will be 60 inches which means you ranging an object 57 inches below your target. in the example of ranging the antelope, you were actually measuring the distance to the ground in front of the antelope.
Essentially, after you zero, the rangefinder to your optic, you will simply put your crosshairs on the object you are ranging and probably the 3 inches doesn’t matter. If it does then just hold 3 inches low.
Otherwise, I really enjoyed the video.
Very explanatory and honest
Appreciate you taking the time to watch!
Your welcome
Where are you located? Those bluffs look familiar! I'm from Montana but I'm in Wyoming a lot!!
Love the content. Very impressive for what looks like a one man show.
One question on the laser zero, won’t the .8mil hold for ranging change as distance increases? 3 inches measured in Mils will change dramatically from 100yd to 1,000.
Great question and you would be right if you don’t get the zero process correct. What I’m showing in the video is a parallel zero. The laser sits 3” above the center of my scope and at 100yds 3” equates to .8 mils. So if I’m able to zero the laser perfectly at .8mils above my crosshair then I have a perfect parallel zero on the laser. Say you zero the laser to your crosshair at 100yds vs the .8 high…. That’s when you would have major error as you get to distance because your laser is set to converge with your crosshair at such a close distance. Hopefully I was able to explain that clearly, let me know if that didn’t make sense haha
@@MountainsMulletsMerica Also had a question along these lines because I was confused about the .8 mil hold for ranging. If the laser has a parallel zero with a 3" offset, wouldn't you just hold center reticle at sufficiently long ranges? For example, a 3" offset at 1000 yards would be 0.08 mils (3"/36"), which is effectively the center of the reticle. Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here.
@@royd-l you are correct.
could never responsibly afford it but I KNOW it's sick
Im curious what its limits are and what the beam divergence is. Im also interested to see a follow up video 5 or 6 months down the road to see what your thoughts are after time behind it.
Very impressive
Quality video on this awesome device. However your ranging method of holding .8 MIL is incorrect. While zeroing and confirming at 100y is fine. The zero of the WMLRF is NOT angular. It is always just 3” high (or however high it is over centerline of optic), it’s not relatable in MILS outside of your zero distance.
User name checks out. I think people sometimes forget mils and moa marks are angle measuring tools and not height measuring tools.
Thanks for another great video and showing us what looks to be a great tool. I'd love to hear your thoughts on how well the app works with the unit in practical use.
@MountainsMulletsMerica I would be interested to hear your take on this also. Generally, I like to use without the app because it is a standalone device. The app does have some added functionality and is easier to read and navigate compared to the device. Some notable functions specific to the app are: Using multi B.C bullets from the library, MV temp tables, sharing profiles and range cards via text/email, storing more than 10 profiles, pulling weather from airports or 3rd party devices, using Impact to drop pins on a map, exclude/include things like spin drift, aero jump and Coriolis in the ballistic calculation (app must be selected as the ballistic source for when connected to the Impact).
@@langy135 Thanks for all that info regarding the app!
Very good video.
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed watching!
For zeroing, why not just adjust so the laser and line of site are parallel? A 3" vertical offset between the laser and the line of sight isn't going to do anything to the ballistic calculation
Interesting.
The new mars unit looks ridiculous, hope you get to review one eventually
Great video