I don't know much about an art restoration, so I have a lot of respect for anyone who can do that. But what I like is that they include the sounds of the restoration process, like scratching or brush strokes, in the track instead of completely replacing them with a music, like other channels would. (Yes Julian, I'm talking to you. ☺)
@@simga5372 Hey Sim, I too appreciate anyone that can do art restoration. However, what we saw was art destruction. The painting could have been restored had a true art restoration expert done it.
I really enjoy watching these restorations. I like watching many channels and seeing the various ideas and methods used depending on the restorer and the artwork. It's nice to see watercolors too! Paper is so tricky. It always amazed me that watercolors can be bathed in order to remove stains.
@@vishtymkin1778 That’s one of many mistakes! You should not keep soaking and re-soaking watercolors! And use chalk and erasers on them. She’s a hack and you can’t see that!
The painting was torn during the restoration process, and the tear is clearly visible in the final result. It is questionable whether this can be called a proper restoration.
@@drucker03 the damage (paper split) was NOT there before. You can see it at 25:00 when you can compare clearly the before and after. This could have EASILY had been avoided (supposing there might be some starting fractures at the sides... which I can't locate at all) if she would have applied some tengu paper on the front with a non-water-soluble adhesive (which are quite to chose from) as to not activate the watercolor when removing the facing.
@@franzrogar Paper can get very brittle and then there's no way to avoid damage. If it could have easily had been avoided she had done it. This woman is an experienced professional and I think you are not. BTW: As I said you can see the damaged zone clearly at 0:12.
@@drucker03 I know paper can get very brittle and there are some way to avoid damage. First and foremost, the one I pointed which would have PREVENTED the crack to appear in the front side, thus PROTECTING the painting even if the backside was removed, allowing you to patch it without compromising the front. Even more, in the worst scenario possible, you could have added MC on the front to strengthen the surface. So, yes, there are ways to avoid damage. As I said you can see there is clearly NO damage in the side-by-side comparison of the painting center at the end of the video.
@@franzrogar There is a noticeable darkened zone where the crack appears later. The paper got amorphous there. I think she had to decide between restoring this and risk damage or to leave it as it is. Regarding this we don't know the instruction of her customer.
I can’t believe she tore that painting completely in half! If I were the client I’d really be disappointed! She should watch some Baumgartner videos before she tries to “restore” another painting again.
Hold up. Just because you watch Baumgartner, doesn't mean you're an expert. I watch him, and a range of other restoration channels and videos. How many watercolor restorations have you watched? It's a very different process to oil and canvas. If you google "watercolor restoration" and check out whether they bathe it, you'll see a range of sites that explain that paper tears, just like canvas, and that it can be bathed.
@ What video were you watching? Yeah it’s a process she hasn’t learned yet. You don’t have to be an “expert” to see that someone ruined an art piece right in front of your eyes! If that was my painting I’d be outraged that it looks worse after she botched it than when it came in. If you read more comments, you’ll see more people agree with me than you.
@@RicksterX-92fs Like I said, you're not an 'expert' just because you watch Baumgartner on TH-cam. Nor are you an 'expert' just because other people also think that. You're just rude. If you think you're so good at it, how about you show us what you've restored. What have you actually done?
@ Sorry. I didn’t realize you were a preeminent art restoration expert. I’ll I know if it smells like…. and looks like …. Then it is sheet. Didn’t need Buamgartner to tell me that. BTW I’ve never seen him rip a painting in half.
It is not allowed to overpaint places with original painting. She should only touch up places where the original painting is missing. Sorry, this is not professional.
Alot of the retouching was to remove stains as much as possible. The white pencil for example was to try and retouch as much of mildew and mold stains as possible while still keeping the original intentnof the artist. The fact that they left some stains visible shows just how careful they were being. Probably felt too much wouldnt be a good idea. Either way, art restoration is not a law, its left up to the discretion of the conservator and the owner.
This is the second watercolor I’ve watched this person “restore”. In both I’ve thought this person seems a little rough for this line of work… I’m no expert, but after being torn in half I’d say this piece is more damaged than when it went in for restoration. And like their previous watercolor video - the attempts to disguise stains and repairs with pencils rubbed in with their finger were noticeable and the colors just look amateurish. There was no attempt to replicate the subtle variations in shades of the original layers of watercolor by the use of one blue pencil right out of the box.
If you notice, the painting already had a dark stain where it will tear, then it was already damaged in that point and the humidity chamber simply revealed it
@@mauropioalcibiade385 Read the T Shirt the person is wearing in the video. The company does "Paper Restoration"... and the channel is flogging digitally enhanced prints of the painting... fine art restoration this is not.
I just came across this video after watching your Williams "Fish Tales" pinball restoration video and was wondering if you have any plans to create a tutorial on restoring old board game boxes?
Wonderful restoration. I have seen paper restorers use some pretty novel techniques. Every piece is different. So the fact it is in far better shape than before using professional archival processes will mean it will last a long long time.
@@richardbell466 Did ya happen to notice she ripped the painting in half? The repair of the ripped up picture went VERY badly. In fact nothing she did was correct nor did she make it archival. Maybe you were watching a different video?
Everyone claiming she tore the work are exaggerating. It clearly fell apart from an area that was already compromised. She obviously knew what she was doing since you couldn't tell it even happened by the time she was done.
Miss O'Reilly has some very impressive credentials in a trade where bad words about a professional run faster than Light. Yeah, other restorers and conservators on this channel have ran the gauntlet and lost. But I've never seen her botch a job. These cybermonkeys dissing her have too much free time, Baumgartner-itis and a blunt tongue, at that. Cheers.
@@The_Modeling_Underdog That painting was in her charge and all that happened to it was her responsibility. You can have all the credentials in the world and still be a hack. The painting was in better shape before she “expertly” ruined it.
2:01 "the poultice soften the adesive which is carefully lifted off without damaginf the watercolor" and than you see the little damage she make removing a bit of the painting 😂😂
Okay but the pencils were just extremely unnecessary :/ she was just adding onto the work, not covering any losses or anything. Maybe trying to cover stains? But if so they weren’t very noticeable so that was unnecessary
i hate repainting. It takes away the history and originality which what I think I the most important. it lets you forget what happened and there for you might do the same mistake again, what we don't want anywhere. just removing the stains smoke and other gunk as well as making a new mount is totally fine.
Miss O'Reilly has some very impressive credentials in a trade where bad words about a professional run faster than Light. Yeah, other restorers and conservators on this channel have ran the gauntlet and lost. But I've never seen her botch a job. These cybermonkeys dissing her have too much free time, Baumgartner-itis and a blunt tongue, at that. Cheers.
I don't know much about an art restoration, so I have a lot of respect for anyone who can do that. But what I like is that they include the sounds of the restoration process, like scratching or brush strokes, in the track instead of completely replacing them with a music, like other channels would. (Yes Julian, I'm talking to you. ☺)
@@simga5372
Hey Sim, I too appreciate anyone that can do art restoration. However, what we saw was art destruction.
The painting could have been restored had a true art restoration expert done it.
Это какая то жесть😢 Это не реставратор! Наши отчественные (лучшие в мире) реставраторы сейчас заплакали
I really enjoy watching these restorations. I like watching many channels and seeing the various ideas and methods used depending on the restorer and the artwork. It's nice to see watercolors too! Paper is so tricky. It always amazed me that watercolors can be bathed in order to remove stains.
@@vishtymkin1778
That’s one of many mistakes! You should not keep soaking and re-soaking watercolors! And use chalk and erasers on them. She’s a hack and you can’t see that!
@@vishtymkin1778
Hey vish, watercolor paintings CAN be restored. She just doesn’t know how to do it.
The painting was torn during the restoration process, and the tear is clearly visible in the final result.
It is questionable whether this can be called a proper restoration.
The damage was there before. You can see it at 0:12 when you look closely.
@@drucker03 the damage (paper split) was NOT there before. You can see it at 25:00 when you can compare clearly the before and after. This could have EASILY had been avoided (supposing there might be some starting fractures at the sides... which I can't locate at all) if she would have applied some tengu paper on the front with a non-water-soluble adhesive (which are quite to chose from) as to not activate the watercolor when removing the facing.
@@franzrogar Paper can get very brittle and then there's no way to avoid damage. If it could have easily had been avoided she had done it. This woman is an experienced professional and I think you are not. BTW: As I said you can see the damaged zone clearly at 0:12.
@@drucker03 I know paper can get very brittle and there are some way to avoid damage. First and foremost, the one I pointed which would have PREVENTED the crack to appear in the front side, thus PROTECTING the painting even if the backside was removed, allowing you to patch it without compromising the front. Even more, in the worst scenario possible, you could have added MC on the front to strengthen the surface. So, yes, there are ways to avoid damage. As I said you can see there is clearly NO damage in the side-by-side comparison of the painting center at the end of the video.
@@franzrogar There is a noticeable darkened zone where the crack appears later. The paper got amorphous there. I think she had to decide between restoring this and risk damage or to leave it as it is. Regarding this we don't know the instruction of her customer.
Fantastic fill
I can’t believe she tore that painting completely in half!
If I were the client I’d really be disappointed!
She should watch some Baumgartner videos before she tries to “restore” another painting again.
I thought the same! Diving the entire piece in water- no, no, no, this is as bad as staples!!!
Hold up. Just because you watch Baumgartner, doesn't mean you're an expert. I watch him, and a range of other restoration channels and videos. How many watercolor restorations have you watched? It's a very different process to oil and canvas. If you google "watercolor restoration" and check out whether they bathe it, you'll see a range of sites that explain that paper tears, just like canvas, and that it can be bathed.
@
What video were you watching? Yeah it’s a process she hasn’t learned yet. You don’t have to be an “expert” to see that someone ruined an art piece right in front of your eyes! If that was my painting I’d be outraged that it looks worse after she botched it than when it came in.
If you read more comments, you’ll see more people agree with me than you.
@@RicksterX-92fs Like I said, you're not an 'expert' just because you watch Baumgartner on TH-cam. Nor are you an 'expert' just because other people also think that. You're just rude. If you think you're so good at it, how about you show us what you've restored. What have you actually done?
@
Sorry. I didn’t realize you were a preeminent art restoration expert.
I’ll
I know if it smells like…. and looks like …. Then it is sheet.
Didn’t need Buamgartner to tell me that. BTW I’ve never seen him rip a painting in half.
It is not allowed to overpaint places with original painting. She should only touch up places where the original painting is missing. Sorry, this is not professional.
That might apply to oil and acrylic paintings but watercolours are a little different, everything is different when you’re dealing with paper.
Are you?
Depends on what the client wants. That’s the only thing that matters. They are paying.
I think she was pretty respectful with her retouching.
Alot of the retouching was to remove stains as much as possible. The white pencil for example was to try and retouch as much of mildew and mold stains as possible while still keeping the original intentnof the artist. The fact that they left some stains visible shows just how careful they were being. Probably felt too much wouldnt be a good idea. Either way, art restoration is not a law, its left up to the discretion of the conservator and the owner.
This is the second watercolor I’ve watched this person “restore”. In both I’ve thought this person seems a little rough for this line of work…
I’m no expert, but after being torn in half I’d say this piece is more damaged than when it went in for restoration.
And like their previous watercolor video - the attempts to disguise stains and repairs with pencils rubbed in with their finger were noticeable and the colors just look amateurish. There was no attempt to replicate the subtle variations in shades of the original layers of watercolor by the use of one blue pencil right out of the box.
If you notice, the painting already had a dark stain where it will tear, then it was already damaged in that point and the humidity chamber simply revealed it
@@mauropioalcibiade385 Read the T Shirt the person is wearing in the video.
The company does "Paper Restoration"... and the channel is flogging digitally enhanced prints of the painting... fine art restoration this is not.
You say you're not and expert but imagine to know better than an experienced professional? This is brave.
@@mauropioalcibiade385 if it was observable then it should have been treated and reinforced separately before the soakings
Haha you have a go mate. Blimey!!!!
I cringe at how rough this restorer is. Yikes.
I just came across this video after watching your Williams "Fish Tales" pinball restoration video and was wondering if you have any plans to create a tutorial on restoring old board game boxes?
I wonder if this work is completely reversible?
I don't get why she is touching up parts with pencils... Too much.
Wonderful restoration. I have seen paper restorers use some pretty novel techniques. Every piece is different. So the fact it is in far better shape than before using professional archival processes will mean it will last a long long time.
@@richardbell466
Did ya happen to notice she ripped the painting in half? The repair of the ripped up picture went VERY badly. In fact nothing she did was correct nor did she make it archival.
Maybe you were watching a different video?
@@RicksterX-92fs are you a professional archivist BTW
The painting was torn. Restoration failed.
Everyone claiming she tore the work are exaggerating. It clearly fell apart from an area that was already compromised. She obviously knew what she was doing since you couldn't tell it even happened by the time she was done.
Miss O'Reilly has some very impressive credentials in a trade where bad words about a professional run faster than Light.
Yeah, other restorers and conservators on this channel have ran the gauntlet and lost. But I've never seen her botch a job.
These cybermonkeys dissing her have too much free time, Baumgartner-itis and a blunt tongue, at that.
Cheers.
@@The_Modeling_Underdog
That painting was in her charge and all that happened to it was her responsibility. You can have all the credentials in the world and still be a hack. The painting was in better shape before she “expertly” ruined it.
tyle pracy przy takim byle jakim rysunku, do kosza
2:01 "the poultice soften the adesive which is carefully lifted off without damaginf the watercolor" and than you see the little damage she make removing a bit of the painting 😂😂
The new mat will cover all of that when’s it’s reframed anyway.
@@doc2kiwidig663not the point really 🤦🏻♀️
@@davide5420
You are correct. That was a display of incompetence. Oh yeah, oops! Sorry I ripped your painting in half!
If I've learned one thing from art restoration videos it's that you have to do an awful lot of scraping
This is too hard to watch. Brutal handling of the artwork.
Okay but the pencils were just extremely unnecessary :/ she was just adding onto the work, not covering any losses or anything. Maybe trying to cover stains? But if so they weren’t very noticeable so that was unnecessary
It was just disrespectful.
Very hard to watch as the depth of focus is so narrow and the auto focus keeps getting confused... maybe time for a better camera....
i hate repainting. It takes away the history and originality which what I think I the most important. it lets you forget what happened and there for you might do the same mistake again, what we don't want anywhere. just removing the stains smoke and other gunk as well as making a new mount is totally fine.
Miss O'Reilly has some very impressive credentials in a trade where bad words about a professional run faster than Light.
Yeah, other restorers and conservators on this channel have ran the gauntlet and lost. But I've never seen her botch a job.
These cybermonkeys dissing her have too much free time, Baumgartner-itis and a blunt tongue, at that.
Cheers.
She jsut botched one right in front of your exes....
18:20 🤔
Mdrrr
What’s with your hands on the painting, a piece of felt would help te rest your fingers on it!
If you had binned it I doubt art history would be crying.
Music makes it unwatchable. Unsubscribed.
shame about the ai voice-over nonsense. un-subbed
That ai voice made me not watch the whole video.