As the gladiators of the Colosseum used to say with weapons upheld, "We who are about to die salute you!" We salute you gladiators, coming into (bloodless at least) battle with an unseen foe!
This is such an amazing video! I'm stuck at 1400 for a few months now because I can't seem to beat these random tricky openings that my opponents always play. I like how Eric calmly reacts to all that craziness and carefully explains all the moves in the opening, helps me understand what my thought process should be when I'm faced with something like this
I wanted to let you know how much I admire the way you handle a loss. Today I explained to my 11 year old son, who was having a hard time when playing Risk, that you just say “what to do” and move on. Thank you for setting such a good example!
Yes! Maybe it could be an idea to talk a little bit about this in a video? For example your take on game psychology, dealing with defeat and how much/if you had to work on handling all this apparently quite well. Anyways, thanks a lot for your work! :)
@@Rathbun222 I love Danya, but I find his analysis too much as he goes into all this cutting edge super-advanced theory that just isn't needed below master level. For beginner to intermediate level I think Rosen is the best.
@@Rathbun222 Irena Krush is also very good btw as she's used to teaching intermediate players (my level!) so understands what we need to learn to improve.
Yeah, I don't think he'll really get tested until he reaches 1700. Above that are players who have more or less mastered the basics and can compete at a higher level.
@@danielward7008he won’t get tested until around 2100 Lmao. Imo most 2100s can play at a low master skill on their best games. Coming from a 2100-2200 player.
This felt like a pretty substantial step up in opponent compared to a a video or 2 ago. More need for opening knowledge and such. Might just be that the level is now above mine! Thanks as always
Woah as a low ELO player it's amazing and honestly scary how much I would be out of my comfort zone if I were in your shoes in the first two games, those were such tricky positions!
one thing i didn't realise about this series, which is genial, is the fact it gives us a chance to stumble into playing Eric as he passed through our rating bands
Maybe it's going to sound weird, but - at least in my experience - it's just a decision, a choice you can make. The moment you decide you don't want to waste energy being pissed, annoyed/annoying, angry, anxious etc., everything else you need to be so calm comes from that decision. It's not necessarily easy but it is just a matter of deciding how you want to react to things.
It's interesting watching this after re-watching some old speedruns by other youtubers, people got so much stronger in last 2-3 years. Back then 1300s would blunder a piece on move on 3 and lose by move 12, had almost no opening knowledge, not it's so much different.
Hello Eric, I know you may never see this comment but I just want to thank you. I quit chess for 3 years, and I have never thought of the game until recent times when I came across your videos. You have inspired me to go back to the game and to never quit again, and I just have you to thank. Keep doing what you are doing! You are a GM in my eyes!
37:00 Fun detail: Nxb7 Kxb7 Bxg8 Rxg8 Qd5 fork wins the rook. It is not a forcing line so white does not surely win the rook, but given black's bad situation, it is easy for black to fall into that trap. At least white would win a pawn after Nxb7.
I think that in between the title to the video, and you on camera there is space to include the current last few moves. That helps those of us playing this out on our boards, for "board sight" rather than just viewing it on a 2d screen. Just a suggestion, because it's nice to see some of the current game score.
The name of the third opening is the St George defense: Woodchuck variation if he had moved his knight back to a7 when you advanced then moved b6 after. But obviously he didnt know that 😂 P.s., Magnus played it against Hikaru a few months ago.
For the 2nd game, would a desperado Qxg2 have been better than just letting White's knight take it? Seems to me like it delays white's knight advancing, and exposes white's king a ton. Though I guess you do go down a knight in that line.
39:26 when he said its mate in 3 I was like isn't Rxf6 mate in 2, and then his engine said its mate in 4 and I sat there looking at it for a while and couldn't find why Rxf6 doesn't lead to mate in 2 so I checked with engine and it said Rxf6 is mate in 2 ?? Why did his engine not show that ? Can anyone explain ?
In the analysis of the second game (30:25) ; wouldn't it be better for white to take the bishop on C5 with the pawn instead of the queen? Why didn't Eric look at that line?
Cosa ci sia di sorprendente nel gambetto Evans mi è difficile capirlo, è una apertura nota da due secoli.. vedi la partita sempreverde Anderssen Dufresne per esempio. P.s. la dicitura partita italiana dopo Ac4 è imprecisa.... Molto imprecisa e infatti gambetto Evans e partita italiana sono due aperture diverse.
In the 3rd game, after 50i5 was down to the king and a pawn, and Rosen had his knight on c4 protected by the pawn on b5, Rosen could have played his rook to e3, which would have kept the white king to the queen's side of the board. Rosen could have stormed any of his king-side pawns down in safety. I think it might have been a little bit quicker than the path he took. In the last game, when Rosen forked the rooks, I would have taken the rook on h8, despite it being further from being active, because I could follow up with taking the knight if he failed to respond. If TOTO45165 still went ahead with Bg6, trading the knight for the bishop would have been a no-brainer. If TOTO play d5 instead, Rosen could choose whether to trade bishops first or bring out the knight, leaving the decision on the trade up to TOTO. Any other move, I think, the knight just slips on out. I had to look up the opening on the last game, but after 2. .... a6, the opening is called the "Nimzowitsch Defense: Woodchuck Variation."
Love the series bro! Something you may consider doing is putting the elo of your opponent on the title of your videos so that viewers know what level your opponent is before they even click on it.
I can imagine that first opponent thinking "Yes, I've confused my opponent and forced him to spend time in the opening!" Poor fellow.
As the gladiators of the Colosseum used to say with weapons upheld, "We who are about to die salute you!"
We salute you gladiators, coming into (bloodless at least) battle with an unseen foe!
Or he might thing that the opponent is using computer for cheating 😂
First opponent is obviously agadmator on his alt. /s
That second game is the best game of the series so far
Very powerful
This is such an amazing video! I'm stuck at 1400 for a few months now because I can't seem to beat these random tricky openings that my opponents always play. I like how Eric calmly reacts to all that craziness and carefully explains all the moves in the opening, helps me understand what my thought process should be when I'm faced with something like this
I thought Eric was the tricky openings guy, now he's teaching us how to PUNISH them?! He's pulling the reverse uno card
Well he had a close call against the alien gambit not so far back...not to worry, my mans had it locked like fort knox
Whoever played the Evan's Gambit didn't know to play d4...
It's all the times he's been punished
ONU my queen…
I wanted to let you know how much I admire the way you handle a loss. Today I explained to my 11 year old son, who was having a hard time when playing Risk, that you just say “what to do” and move on. Thank you for setting such a good example!
Yes! Maybe it could be an idea to talk a little bit about this in a video? For example your take on game psychology, dealing with defeat and how much/if you had to work on handling all this apparently quite well.
Anyways, thanks a lot for your work! :)
MY FAVOURITE SERIES ON YT
Hey Eric, I've gone from 700-1200 in the past 3 months and I attribute that to this series alone! Thanks for the great analyses!
I think he's quietly the best teacher on TH-cam. No hype, no crazy variations. Just clear, concise overviews of his plans and calculations each game.
@@danielward7008Daniel nardistky or however the f it’s spelt is also good
@@Rathbun222 I love Danya, but I find his analysis too much as he goes into all this cutting edge super-advanced theory that just isn't needed below master level. For beginner to intermediate level I think Rosen is the best.
@@Rathbun222 Irena Krush is also very good btw as she's used to teaching intermediate players (my level!) so understands what we need to learn to improve.
9:58
You can hear the ambulance rushing to Eric's opponent
dam I was watching on 3.0x speed and didn't hear anything, had to replay at normal speed to hear it 🤯
Eric’s games are getting very close to my current elo and it still seems effortless even down material… you’re a magician Mr Rosen.
Yeah, I don't think he'll really get tested until he reaches 1700. Above that are players who have more or less mastered the basics and can compete at a higher level.
@@danielward7008he won’t get tested until around 2100 Lmao. Imo most 2100s can play at a low master skill on their best games. Coming from a 2100-2200 player.
And that's the mark of a strong player, or indeed a master of any skill. To make it look easy.
Even jetlagged, Eric's calculation is streets ahead.
Streets ahead! Been a while since I head that one.
@@wolfMetall "streets ahead" is verbal WILDFIRE.
man i gotta say best videos on youtube i hope when u finish on this account you start over again it is so educational and so chill
That last game was so hard to watch. Brutal af 🤣
I love that you turned on the eval bar for the analysis! Really puts the thoughts you expressed while playing into perspective! Love the series
This felt like a pretty substantial step up in opponent compared to a a video or 2 ago. More need for opening knowledge and such. Might just be that the level is now above mine! Thanks as always
Don't be intimidated. You can only learn good habits from strong players 👍
The Evan’s gambit looks so fun. I would have struggled against that pressure for sure.
Woah as a low ELO player it's amazing and honestly scary how much I would be out of my comfort zone if I were in your shoes in the first two games, those were such tricky positions!
one thing i didn't realise about this series, which is genial, is the fact it gives us a chance to stumble into playing Eric as he passed through our rating bands
Keep up the good content, Mr. Rosen. This is presently my favorite TH-cam series!
Eric always blessing my feed with content. Not the hero we deserve but the one we need
Thanks Eric! Always nice to hear your calm, soothing tones
I like how every other game in this direction Eric says: "you shouldn't move your F-pawn early, but..."
Really fun games and super pedagogical comments throghout, thank you!
How can someone be so calm.
Maybe it's going to sound weird, but - at least in my experience - it's just a decision, a choice you can make. The moment you decide you don't want to waste energy being pissed, annoyed/annoying, angry, anxious etc., everything else you need to be so calm comes from that decision. It's not necessarily easy but it is just a matter of deciding how you want to react to things.
@@999SickBoy666 It's not weird at all, you are right it is so simple - but simple doesn't mean easy.
Eric: "We see an Evans gambit. White is offering a pawn, which I will take..."
Me: "NOOOO be careful it's Antonio doing a speedrun!!"
Opponent wanted to play the Evans Gambit like Paul Morphy but some of his pieces never left their starting positions. 🤣
I didn't expect the direct look at the 4th wall at the end. 🙂 It caught me off guard.
Well done Eric. Keep it up 👍🏻
How effectively you have taught us a great lesson and simplified every move and it's logic. Love from India.
Such a great series, learnt so much already
It's interesting watching this after re-watching some old speedruns by other youtubers, people got so much stronger in last 2-3 years. Back then 1300s would blunder a piece on move on 3 and lose by move 12, had almost no opening knowledge, not it's so much different.
Hello Eric, I know you may never see this comment but I just want to thank you. I quit chess for 3 years, and I have never thought of the game until recent times when I came across your videos. You have inspired me to go back to the game and to never quit again, and I just have you to thank. Keep doing what you are doing! You are a GM in my eyes!
17:40 "I guess if I wanna play a6 then 9 moves later I'm still up a pawn"...I wish my brain worked like this
You are the best teacher ever. El mejor!
Amazing games. That 3rd game, your first loss in the series. What a chance running into that GM. Good game!
Eric we have been waiting for your videos the hole week 😢
Great series so far!
37:00 Fun detail: Nxb7 Kxb7 Bxg8 Rxg8 Qd5 fork wins the rook. It is not a forcing line so white does not surely win the rook, but given black's bad situation, it is easy for black to fall into that trap. At least white would win a pawn after Nxb7.
I think that in between the title to the video, and you on camera there is space to include the current last few moves. That helps those of us playing this out on our boards, for "board sight" rather than just viewing it on a 2d screen. Just a suggestion, because it's nice to see some of the current game score.
I see how brilliant you finish the game, despite the aggressive attack initiated from the opponent
IM Rosen drops a new Speedrun video. That's my Thursday evening sorted.
I was just recently getting seriously into chess. I had no idea how brutally you could punish the Evans gambit
Agadmator would be very interested in that first game.
The name of the third opening is the St George defense: Woodchuck variation if he had moved his knight back to a7 when you advanced then moved b6 after. But obviously he didnt know that 😂
P.s., Magnus played it against Hikaru a few months ago.
Okay literally as i finished this comment you said that but i worked too hard on it to delete it
Enjoyed the episode. Thank you.
Lovely video as always Eric. Where is that mug from? I envy it every time it appears on steam/YT!
Loved these videos, it teaches me how you think in chess😙
I miss the sub battles between both streams, and you both chatting throughout
Against the Nimzovitch Defense I play Nc3 and leave them either with the Vienna or some other non-Sicilian semi opened transposition.
You make great chess videos 👍
Poacher turned gamekeeper!
If one of my games got called “an opening disaster” by Mr Rosen 😭😂
When trading queens at 24:30 why not crash the queen into g2 with check to get a pawn out of the exchange?
I was hungry prior to watching this video, but after that all you can eat buffet, I'm good!
For the 2nd game, would a desperado Qxg2 have been better than just letting White's knight take it? Seems to me like it delays white's knight advancing, and exposes white's king a ton. Though I guess you do go down a knight in that line.
39:26 when he said its mate in 3 I was like isn't Rxf6 mate in 2, and then his engine said its mate in 4 and I sat there looking at it for a while and couldn't find why Rxf6 doesn't lead to mate in 2 so I checked with engine and it said Rxf6 is mate in 2 ?? Why did his engine not show that ? Can anyone explain ?
Spotted that too, shows on the engine on the chessvision app
Your videos help me sleep, thanks Eric
wow ur opponent in the 1st game just stumbled through top Evans gambit theory
24:10 Is Nf3 winning the rook? If pawn takes it might be mate in 3?
Your Queen was en pris to the rook near the end, although your opponent didn't see it.
Instant 800th like, just on title alone 👊🏻🔥 #nomercy
Please can you do some Sicilian and Nf3 opening games :) love the content
how do you add those attack lines? seems like a useful counting tool
In the analysis of the second game (30:25) ; wouldn't it be better for white to take the bishop on C5 with the pawn instead of the queen? Why didn't Eric look at that line?
speedrun nis back
On the last game why can’t you remove the defender (dark squared bishop) with your rook then your next move is checkmate?
Hi, could you please let me know how you have the computer showing the moves before you move ur piece? thanks
That last game looked a lot like a Kings gambit.
Oh goody, yet more great Rosen chess play!
Thank you Mr. Pleasant ;)
I'd love to see what happens had the second one actually found B4
39:30 isn't mate in 2? Rxf6, Kxf6, Qg7?
Why not bishop to D3 if pawn to D4 in your after game scenario?
Happy 666.000 subscribers!
I saw your post about content coming soon. I wasn’t expecting it today. Haha
In the last game wasn't rook takes bishop mate next move
Finally, I'm all caught up.
I think its mate in 2 in the last game with rook sacrifice f6 taking the bishop protecting the mate .
At 24:24, instead of trading queens, wasn't there a desperado sacrifice on g1 as an intermezzo? That way you get a queen and a pawn for the queen.
You mean on g2? I was thinking the same thing at the time, but no, Qxg2+ Kxg2 Nxb5 Nxb5 and Eric has dropped a Knight.
@@RGP_Maths You're right! I'm so bad at chess.
@@timg6125 Me too, don't worry!
22:14 Why did your mouse cursor enlarge like that?
Cosa ci sia di sorprendente nel gambetto Evans mi è difficile capirlo, è una apertura nota da due secoli.. vedi la partita sempreverde Anderssen Dufresne per esempio. P.s. la dicitura partita italiana dopo Ac4 è imprecisa.... Molto imprecisa e infatti gambetto Evans e partita italiana sono due aperture diverse.
The Evans Gambit is beautiful, just not how it was played here
30:43 Look at that C file
When is the Stafford gambit coming????
Instead of taking the rook for knight in game one could you have not played Bb5 and the Nd3 to save the pieces?
20:00 POLAND MOUNTAIN
In the 3rd game, after 50i5 was down to the king and a pawn, and Rosen had his knight on c4 protected by the pawn on b5, Rosen could have played his rook to e3, which would have kept the white king to the queen's side of the board. Rosen could have stormed any of his king-side pawns down in safety. I think it might have been a little bit quicker than the path he took.
In the last game, when Rosen forked the rooks, I would have taken the rook on h8, despite it being further from being active, because I could follow up with taking the knight if he failed to respond. If TOTO45165 still went ahead with Bg6, trading the knight for the bishop would have been a no-brainer. If TOTO play d5 instead, Rosen could choose whether to trade bishops first or bring out the knight, leaving the decision on the trade up to TOTO. Any other move, I think, the knight just slips on out.
I had to look up the opening on the last game, but after 2. .... a6, the opening is called the "Nimzowitsch Defense: Woodchuck Variation."
Opponent has probably watched some TH-cam lol😂
17:44 eric Nakamura
"Eric the Punisher"
I need to see twitch stream now
Watching your stream now
Hey would you mind showing what country their flag is? Sometimes I'm unable to recognize it but I'm always curious. Thank you for the content! :)
39:45 isn't rxf6 mate in 2?
It is, not sure why the engine said otherwise. So’s Qd8+ for that matter.
Thinking of offering "Beginner to Mediocre" speedrun lol
Absolutely love your content but creepy thumbnail this one man 😂
I watched Game 1 three times because I get a lot of this as Black.
Love the series bro! Something you may consider doing is putting the elo of your opponent on the title of your videos so that viewers know what level your opponent is before they even click on it.
40:50 if you are carlsen you play Nb8 and win anyway.
Let’s get Eric off the 666,666 subs
How can you find that the piece is trapped so quickly?
If u play as many games he has played u would know too😊