AR Bans DEAD FOREVER As Liberal Justice’s Dissent Destroys Themselves… Thank You Justice Sotomayor…
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
- Tack Pack Link: www.tacpack.com
AR Bans DEAD FOREVER As Liberal Justice’s Dissent Destroys Themselves… Thank You Justice Sotomayor… In tonight's episode, we dive into the dissent in the Cargill case from Justice Sotomayor. She has singlehandedly put AR Bans on ice in her verbiage choice... Let's GO!
Articles for Reference:
www.supremecou...
They shouldn't be left or right justices. They should just be constitutional justices
Yeah...and is the Constitution really written so cryptically that interpretations CAN POSSIBLY be diametrically opposed to each other?! All the justices should agree, all the time!
I AGREE BUT MOST OF THE RIGHT JUSTICES ARE
@StoneShards
That's called esigesis interpretation, it's what a lot of people do with the Bible too.
It shouldn't be up to justices to make a judgement when it's unclear how the constitution should be interpreted. If there is an issue it should be the legislative that clarifies the law. Division of powers: Legislative makes the laws, Executive enforces the law and Judicative applies the law. Something that hasn't worked right in the US for a long time.
If they were all Constitutional judges, they would be Conservative. All the Founding Fathers were Conservatives.
We need more Clarence Thomas's on the SCOTUS.
Greatest Justice Ever! And to think Brandon tried to keep him off
more judges that understand the Constitution not communist judges wanting to destroy it
@budkingston3347 oh yeah, you should look up the hearings for Justice Thomas with beijing biden. It was disgusting what Thomas went through
Younger ones too.
@budkingston3347 he also ruined Robert Bork's chance, and he would've been awesome. Talk about an originalist. Robert Bork was the man for the task an Thomas Sowell took Joey Biden to task during a confirmation hearing, yet Democrats still got their way based on character assassination. It was then that I realized they were saboteurs.
The Supreme Court should overturn the magazine ban as they are in common use more than bump stocks.
Yet states will continue to defy their rulings as they have with Bruen and Heller
every magazine ban that went to court so far has been overturned.
Hopefully. I have a few guns i want but come with standard capacity mags and we can't get them here in WA.
Great point and thank you. Now progress in educating demoncrats.
She just did overturn magazine bans. The "commonly available" guns used in that shooting had standard capacity magazines.
I read somewhere that Justice Sotomayor has been known to sit in her chambers and cry over these types of rulings. Knowing this was probably one of those rulings warms my heart.
Supposedly, she’s in bad health.
@@archcunningham5579 Mental health, like most liberals are
😅😅😅
Cracked Me Up!! 🥳
@@archcunningham5579 Maybe she will be replaced after Trump gets in office.. 7-2 will make their heads explode..🤣
You have little faith in how Greasy Gavin can disobey the law and force us CA citizens to obey him. He needs to go!
New-Scum is termed out in 2026.
Long over due! If Hitler had a son! Gavin definitely would admire him. 😊
JOeY did the same thing with Student Loans Democrats and Rinos both need to go!
and he wants to be president, heck no
It's because our founding fathers knew people like Gavin Newsom exist that they gave us the second amendment as an absolute last resort.
This is why you don’t give a inch because they will try to take a mile
just the tip. 🤣😂🤣
Why are we allowing congress to define what a machine gun is? Shouldn’t the firearm manufacturers set that definition? Congress doesn’t know the difference between a clip and a magazine, a bullet and a cartridge?
Or Come Here from Sic Um
It has to be defined in statute, regardless of who actually wrote the definition. Otherwise, it can be stretched to mean anything
@@jeffreygunn3530, like it already is being, stretched.
@@jeffreygunn3530 but it SHOULD begin from gun manufacturers or some one who HAS A CLUE about firearms.
@@jeffreygunn3530 fine, just use the one the manufacturer uses.
she always gets upset when the courts don't legislate from the bench...
Then, she needs to vacate her position.
BE GONE !!!
SCOTUS isn't a place for cry babies or A O C would BE THERE !
I haven't read in the 2nd amendment that SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED only includes commonly used/owned weapons. Who came up with this? This shouldn't even be an issue being discussed. The RIGHT to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT be infringed. Period.
As many times as I have read the 2nd amendment I have never read the word “ except “ so every bit of weapons restriction is unconstitutional. Those who violate it are treasonous
Then WHY is it, on a daily basis?
That really is fantastic. Out of her own mouth, it is "commonly available". Priceless.
This should quote must posted on bill boards across the country.
I don't know how a "Justice" can rule on firearms when she can't define what a woman is due to not being a biologist, she is not a gunsmith either? right?
she hasn't a clue about guns, except: guns: BAD!
Crap. That is good logic. *THIS SHOULD BE LOOKED INTO*
She either defines what a woman is biologically or shows us her gunsmithing license.
How could she make a ruling on RvW or any ruling dealing with women if she can’t define a woman?
love it
I am surprised that the 3 justices do not recognize the Constitutional requirement for legislation to enact new laws. This shows the power of activist judges not recognizing constitutional limits. Very Dangerous.
they dont hate guns , they only like guns in the hands of people THEY control.
Excellent..
Excellent. The law abiding they control. The thugs don’t give a chit and are uncontrollable.
oh please. the only ones trying to control people are the ones on the regressive right. attacking reproductive rights, instituting book bans, putting xtianity in schools. all your claims about the left controlling people are nothing but facebook memes with little to no basis in reality. nobody's gonna come and confiscate your guns, nobody is coming for your gas stove, nobody is going to force you to buy an electric car or boat or fight sharks.
❇️God Bless Clarence Thomas.!❇️ 🇺🇲He's a true Patriot.!🇺🇲
Please God, PROTECT Clarence Thomas!!
Don't get carried away with Sotomayor's flub. She can say and do whatever she wants even if she contradicts herself every step of the way.
You're right, of course. This isn't nearly as wonderful as Braden is making it out to be.
Yes, the democrat way!
@@skeletonmakesgoodhe did his job and got the clicks to get the money 💰
As she has proved, every time she has opened her mouth. She's a total basket case. Personally, I think she should be drug tested.
@@Freedom76685 Do you practice cynicism, or does it just come naturally?
What about California stupid "assault rifle" ban?
Sue the state
The lawsuit was filed and went all the way to the 9th circuit Court of Appeals which does not believe in the rule of law but only in their own leftist political ideologies and biases.
@@CaneCorsoZ LOL
Nothing, As long as the people continue to not mind living with it. They say sending money to gun groups and the like might/could make you feel better.
They will ignore it..
LETS GO USA 🇺🇸
Sotomayor hasn’t followed the law in single gun related decision ever. Her goal is to eliminate the Second Amendment and disarm every single citizen. It always has been her goal and it always will never be her goal regardless or what the law says.
liberal democrats don't care about the law, their goal is to make every a citizen a slave to the federal government.
Never thought Justice Sotomayor was a good lawyer, but thanks for your decision!
We the People first then the CONSTITUTION and finally LIMITED government. WAKE up AMERICA 🇺🇸
She’s probably back in her office crying!!!
she needs to resign!
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
She hasn't destroyed anything until the SCOTUS rules on it (and uses her own argument as part if the defense for owning semiautos).
but it's OUT THERE for all to see and all to use!!!
They’re just going to find another way around it. Don’t let your guard down.
Las Vegas absolutely was NOT a bump stock.
As Napoleon once taught us, don't interrupt an opponent that is making a mistake.
She definitely had another issue in her dissent. Law enforcement never told what rifles were actually used.
Indeed they didn't- and anyone who has any specific knowledge of firearms at all could tell that the "official narrative" didn't line up with what was seen and heard.
@RighteousJ The fire rate seen and heard from live videos taken at the time absolutely do not match what is seen and heard from any rifle with a bump stock, they don't even match with an M4A1 on auto. It was a mucj faster fire rate, matching more closely an M249.
@@ChrisWilliams-lf8ex exactly.
@@ChrisWilliams-lf8ex never mind that muzzle flashes appeared in multiple windows at once.
The Constitution does not permit any subversion by the executive, legislative, or judicial branches of government at any level. None of these nonsensical laws are valid.
true but why wont scotus say this out loud?
None of them are willing to acknowledge that they don't have the authority. It's up to the people to demand the rights be upheld.
"He did so by affixing bump stocks to commonly available, semiautomatic rifles." --- Justice Sotomayor
Thank you, Justice Sotomayor is right. Admitting semiautomatic rifles as common use by way of Heller.
I really wish the Supreme court would offer up stern unappologetic straight to the point decisions instead of adding pacifying language like 'in common use' to neuter what the Constitution clearly states. Even the rarest of firearms are covered by the 2A. They DON'T have to be in common use and can also be full military grade for civilians to own. When the Constitution was written and ratified it did not say that normal civilian citizens' weapons were ever supposed to be any less capable than ANY militaries' firearms.
"Common Use," yes, but the 2nd also did NOT ban citizens from owning military-grade weapons. If the Founders had thought it should, we'd have lost the Revolutionary War.
President Trump's 2A stance was my only issue with his presidency. I'm hoping he's learned the error of his ways in his 2nd term. I am a 2A voter. It's by far our most important freedom.
EXACTLY - anyone who's against 2A shouldn't be making laws
"in common use" means it can't be banned. See the Caitano case in MASS for tasers.
The Constitution would disagree....
@@zbelair7218 Oops, you flubbed-up. No where in the constitution does it say the government can ban anything. The bill of rights are the rights the government and states cannot change without 2/3rds states, house and congress agreeing to the change. Good luck with that. Anything not mentioned in the constitution is left to the states to decide. The 2A is absolute, period, and even says so in its very text. "Shall not be infringed."
She didn't say in common use. See this video again
@@Batmann_ Did *I* say she said 'in common use'? She wrote 'commonly available, semiautomatic rifles'. This is shown at 2:13. Braden then says Heller discussed 'in common use' at 2:27, and from 2:45 to 2:54.
Maybe you should watch the video a couple of times.
@@Batmann_simple logic would suggest they wouldn't be "commonly available" if they weren't in common use
If I lived in a free state I wouldn’t own a bump stock. I don’t know if a lot of gun owners own or use bump stocks. Gun owners are elated that the Supreme Court sided with gun owners and curtailed the overreach of the ATF.
Seems like a waste of ammo to me. I'd rather be accurate and fast. I'm also behind enemy lines.
Your comment is a myriad of unrelated thoughts.....
I live in a free state. Never had any desire to own one either but just nice to know that if I change my mind…
@@sombra6153 the bumpstock itself isn't what's important. It's the massive executive branch overreach that the ban represented. I also don't care at all about bumpstocks, but if you give the government an inch they will take a mile. If the ban stood, they would see that as tacit approval of such unconstitutional behavior, and it would only be a matter of time before they dropped another executive order banning something else we DO care about.
@@JohnSmith-ly2qp
Exactly. I still don't understand why anyone would want or need one.
Just because you CAN doesn't mean you should.
And I don't compare this to a Pistol Grip, which is used to help people fire more accurately, and be safer.
A bump stock, from what I have heard, alters a semi- automatic rifle, basically, into an automatic rifle.
I have also heard that it can damage the gun, so if that is true, why use one at all?
To be fair to Trump, Chevron Defrence has been abused long before the bump stock ban, and we cannot stay home and not vote because of his ill advised ban. Reagan was against people owning AR's and AK's, but I bet most here loved him. Well same with Trump.
You do know that reagan started out as a democrat(actually demoncrat now). As republican as Reggie was as president he started politics as a Democrat. Moral here is that even a Democrat can learn better.
@@douglasbockman2772 the amusing thing is that Donald is the same on that as well... a clinton era Dem who decided to step up when "his party" decided to commit suicide. Reagan did that as well.
Yes, Donald is not great for that... but it is going to be interesting.
@@douglasbockman2772 Reagan was an old commie and never really changed. He was a new deal POS. If there was a hell I would want that leftwing POS roasting there.
Bump stocks were temporarily sacrificed in order to save actual rights. Bump stocks are free market, not constitutionally protected rights
That was before Democrats were destroying America.
Braden, I love you brother!!!!
FJB FJB
Well, I translated you comment into English but it still says the same thing.
FJB ?...
States need to abide by our constitution and scotus rulings!! No if's and's or but's!!
HOW is dissent considered precedent? It's what FAILED to pass judicial review.
And whatever case takes out, the NFA is gonna be the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow
I live in VA that has most tough 2A laws already, then a Benedict Arnold Dan helmer (a veteran) introduce a bill to ban of the AR15 that was passed, but thank god the governor Glenn Younkin veto it
VA must be getting flooded with DC and Maryland transplants
Vegas was a 240B not a AR with bumpstock.
There's no way he used a bump stock.
Damn right!
Officially forevaaah!!😊 Now repeal the NFA!
SCOTUS needs to end Chevron Deference. It's what allows the ATF, EPA and every other agency to write "rules" and enforce them as "law".
Sounds like Tradition😂😂😂😂😂
They will never stop
So much for the “Wise Latina”
get that IL ban removed!!
The whole intarwebz has been screaming "common use" for ages. It's nice to finally have it written in an official court document.
Wow, first time I've ever seen a USSC Justice self-debunk in a Dissent before 🤣Thanks Sotomayor!
❤ Thank you for breaking this down.
SCOTUS needs to get off their collective lazy asses and decide everything 2A once and for all… AWB, Mag bans, SBR’s, tax stamp etc etc
Hell yea!! Just in time for 4th of July celebration
And it was on flag day if I’m not mistaken. 😂. Oh and it was on Trumps birthday also. What are the odds? I just wonder if Trump would’ve left the bump stocks alone, if all this would’ve happened.
After Trump is reelected, this country can forget once and for all the word Democrats.
I probably despise what democrats stand for just as much as you but your comment is poorly worded at best.
@@derrickrr5516 Not all of us are Laurite Scholars, sorry bout that........
lmao, Trumps a fking rino! 🤣😂🤣
That would be a big mistake.
Because trump is going to declare that voters made him king ! I don't like trump, but four more years of biden will destroy the constitution of the United States of America, especially the 2a.
This decision also sets it up for the eventual deregulation of automatic firearms.
this throws out the poison pill on which the ATFs chevron deference overreach is based on!
That's the best news we've had in a long time Braden keep up the good work
Will the SCROTUS ever make a ruling that actually follows the Constitution? Very doubtful. As long as the SCROTUS (in)Justices are appointed, for life, by career politicians, the side of their bread that gets buttered, is not the side that we citizens are on. Another argument for term limits, not just for Congress, but for the judges of the SCROTUS, as well.
The Founding Fathers wrote things down the same way that they spoke. "Shall not be infringed" means the same thing today,as it did when the quill touched the parchment.
When I heard she had said this I wondered if anti-gun judges like Woods and Easterbrook would listen to this and remember Heller
I can tell you now. No!
I know they want her to hurry and retire so she could be replaced.
Throw the mag bans in as well.
This outa be good
It’s nice that you believe the AR ban is forever halted. By NOT ruling on 2A grounds but on the APA grounds it simply allows the ATF and other Government agencies to take another shot.
I would be willing to bet they are already writing new processes to come at us again.
TRUMP 2024
Trump 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
We don't need the Zionist, Big Pharma, controlled: Anti 2A Trump Turd. There has to be someone better. Like Chuck Norris....to come in and take care of business. LOL
Ah Trump, The originator of the bump stock ban. Why do people ignore this?
something something ''take the guns first, then due process after''. 🤣😂🤣
The sheep always forget that @@investigativeoutcomes9343
My wife said why do u need an AR15 ?
I don't,
Yet........
Cus I can, should be the only answer
Ya never know, though
You will soon.
Did you explain to her that you need several 🤷🏼
@@ew332 Locked and loaded
I live in New York state and we still have AR ban you can't buy one with a pistol grip and it will never change here.. can't wait to move out of this state
I can't wait for pro-gun rulings to reference her point there.
Now for them to pull their heads out of their butts and rule on just 1 ban case.
when the awb goes to scotus she will still vote against it with a completely irrelevant reason
"If something is like chicken, doesn't make it chicken"
Mark W. Smith
Four Boxes Diner
Manassas VA here!
That's great news finally,someone with brains and common since...
Sense!
*sense
Watch them change the definition of "common use"
End Chevron. Restore Freedom to the We the People.
I don't think it amounts to a hill of beans.
This won’t deter Dems from trampling on our rights like always. There should be consequences for any representative that introduces bills that are clearly unconstitutional, but accountability is a non existent word in this administration.
GOOOD DEAL
This isn't the 'own' that you seem to think it is, because a dissent is by definition not the opinion of the court and is usually not citable as authority by any attorney or court for any purpose whatsoever.
Correct.
click bait!
I’m hoping that SCOTUS strikes down the other laws that are being reviewed.
Thank You.
All this means nothing if there are no consequences to politicians ignoring the SC and just re-introducing slightly differently worded laws that then just have to be RE-litigated.
You can bet that when the enemy makes a mistake like this they were trying to convey a different message than the way it came out.
So any law relying on the fact that ARs are not in common use is completely illegal.
Thanks for the report.
In Oregon, they just passed 80 percent lower ban. Goes into effect next month
I wish I shared your optimistic appraisal of the situation.
Thanks my hero
Can we free Matt Hoover now?
So when will connecticut have to stop it's assault weapons ban? So sick of it
If the Congress never passed the Hughes act in 1986 all firearms would be in common use the Hughes act only increase the prices of firearms so only the wealthy people could enjoy them
Not a single inferior court will follow the dissent in Cargill as the current state of the law.
Spot on sir, game set match, 2A wins, and an extra gift from a socialist Judges dissent. -W. Liggett
Finally a smart decision.
Slamming things gets you on the rebound... thank you ma'am
I don't think bumpstocks ever left civilian hands
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Sotomayor should be removed and disbarred. It's ashame that she goes after guns instead of criminals.
The simple fact that the 2nd Amendment was originally written to recognize the right of the governed to bear EFFECTIVE arms to deny the government a 'monopoly of force', semi-automatic, as well as selective-fire firearms, with high capacity magazines, are protected, END OF DISCUSSION! It's not 'gun control' it's people control.
This should #FreeCRSFirearms